关于广播剧（十）
Chinese version
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站收费处之后，你要么下了楼梯就在东北大学里，要么下了楼梯你就不知该往哪走，要么你就走着走着就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。
我的电邮地址：SomebodyInMA@gmail.com
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
09-29-2018 All are rumors, but I have to let people hear to check out if impacted (都是些传言，但我应该说出来让大家查查有没有受到过影响）
中华人民共和国有已经出版的现成法律可以让政府向困扰人士解释什么法律权益及财产的法律所有权，有现成的中国公安部可以调查是否有违反法律的行为，有武装警察不怕穷凶极恶之徒，我难以明白，“活着不吃你们一粒米，死了也不用你们付丧葬费”，为什么我在美国以一个美国公民身份说我继承了我亲生爷爷在1949年中国大陆解放之前就已经信托在国外的钱居然会造成中国人民共和国的社会治安问题？
The People's Republic of China has existing in-prints laws for the Chinese government to explain to all those confused what is lawful ownership of any confused money, China has public safety department to track down those intentionally to challenge laws, and China has armed police in troops to protect Chinese people from extremes. I just can't understand, being an American citizen who "doesn't eat a piece of crops when living and bears no cost to you by death", why my freedom to state I am rich can become a disturbing factor to China's national security? All the money I stated to own has been entrusted outside China before 1949 the ruling of the current People's Republic of China.
1: I heard this morning's actress wife whose husband featured in this morning's story of "need to 30% profit need from companies in British, France, etc." is a British married since 2007. The Chinese wife is another Amercian's wife since 2006. I never met both husbands nor both wives either. (今天早上提到的“必须从法国英国的公司里拿三成利润的”那个人的妻子是个英国女演员，2007年就结婚了的。另一个中国人也是和她的美国人丈夫在2006年就已经结婚了。我从未见过这两个当丈夫的（美国人），也从未见过这两个人各自的妻子。）
2: One of the producers of this morning's broadcasting is. by rumor, the eldest child from "the Beijing ex-girlfriend's story." The updates on that story are that she was the girlfriend to my grandfather's private assistant who possibly mothers this eldest child from the private assistant Ding(丁). This private assistant Ding was rumored biologically fathered by a Mr. Yu who was in 5 cousins with the famous Beijing actor Yu, Shizhi（于是之). This private assistant Ding's biological family was rumored the group who have despised my grandmother so much to have been so reach-out to despise me in order to "disqualify" me to be the beneficiary of my own birth grandfathers' Trusts. I have contacted U.S. laws regarding all these hate-arousing efforts from the Chinese community. According to laws, I am the sole beneficiary of my own Trusts after my 2004's inheriting and entrusting.（今天早上提到的那个制作人是“北京前女友故事”的长子。最新消息是这个北京前女友其实是丁姓私人助理的一份情并一起育有这个长子。丁姓私人助理据传是有一位于先生的血脉传承，这个于先生和北京人艺的名演员于是之是五福以内的亲戚。据说这个丁姓私人助理及其血缘亲人们对我奶奶是厌恶至极，所以如此伸长了脖子对我表达如此不耻厌恶就为了让普天下的世人都明白我“如此不配”继承我自己亲生爷爷们替我设立的信托。我是就华裔社区一直有人不停的煽动针对我方敏的仇恨向美国警方报警。根据法律，在2004年我继承信托有重新办理信托之后，我是自己替我自己所设立的信托的唯一受益人。）
It is rumored private assistant Ding's biological family has been saying this in quotes: "She does not deserve you, and I would give you her money if I can have the opportunity" to everybody that in romance rumor with me. And "throw-out her children if you already have some by mistake. Just take the money," is rumored said by private assistant Ding's biological relatives in the Chinese foreign department. （据传就是丁姓私人助理的血缘家庭在到处和人说我方敏不配这个男人不配那个男人，有机会就只要把方敏的钱弄走就得。至于到处那些表态说”如果某人不幸犯错已经有了方敏的孩子也就是扔出去就得的“据说是丁姓私人助理在中国外交部的一些于姓亲朋。）
It is rumored American Albert Gore's Chinese romance Miss Yu was a former Chinese diplomat who is in 7th cousins association with private Ding's biological family, in 5-cousins relative relationship to the famous Shanghai Miss Yu who,rumored, died miserably at age 31(unmarried & unwanted, with a wounded womb incapable to carry a child) in the 1970s because her father conditioned her to have a child before inheriting the Trust in Hong Kong that her father had set up for her solely in 1946 or so. （据说美国名人阿尔贝特·高尔的中国情名嫒于姓小姐是中国外交部的前任外交官，和丁姓私人助理是7等亲，和70年代时在上海去世的那个上海名嫒于小姐是五等亲。据说上海在1970-1979年代有个于小姐，因为其父亲于先生在1946年替她在香港设立了一个信托并规定其女儿上海于小姐必须有她自己的小孩之后才可以继承（据说就是现在总值50万或者5千万美金的那个香港于家信托）。据说这个上海于小姐31岁悲凉去世时既没结过婚也交不到男朋友，她的子宫也还因为受损根本就不可能怀孕生子。）
Rumored this was the same group who may have made my father's both younger sisters had troubled marriages in Shanghai local area in the same tone as you heard from this morning's broadcasting, and possibly did give out my grandfather's money at family inheriting time as declared "get their money and move on" similarly as you heard from this morning's broadcasting.（据说就是这同一拨人可能让我父亲的两个妹妹在上海当地的婚姻都是有点故事。原因可能就是你们今天早上听到的语气表达，据说还有可能真是把我爷爷的钱在分家产时按照”就是不会要你，拿了钱就过自己日子去了”的原则送人处理了。就是你们今天早上听到的这种态度。。丁姓私人助理自己拿的是我父亲的应分的那一份。）
3: I heard so many angry voices from the People's Republic of China saying I am too much. So I am asking exactly which money, what amount, whose money, what law & law items, what incidence to make you state so? In English or in Chinese. China has the Chinese Constitution（中华人民共和国宪法）, Trusting laws（中华人民共和国信托法）, inheriting laws（中华人民共和国继承法）, and criminal laws（中华人民共和国刑法） in prints for whoever can read to find references to answer my question regarding what law & law items has regulated so clearly on what matter for so many Chinese to yell at me "too much". （我听说中华人民共和国和有很多愤怒的声音说我太过份了，我想问一下，究竟是什么钱，多少钱，谁的钱以及哪条法律的那一条条款，以及究竟什么原因让你们就是够资格如此说三道四？中华人民共和国的现行的宪法，刑法，继承法以及信托法等都是有已经正式出版过的中文版和英文版，念过书识点字的都可以查阅以回答我所提出的上述问题也就是：“究竟平哪条法律那一条款让你们可以对我吆喝实在太离谱了”。
----Sept 29th. 2018
09-27-2018 于家故事还有多少？(How many more stories related to Yu's family)
我爷爷方智仁在香港替我设立的信托，是在1948年，当时的设立资金就是一千五百万美金，方智仁爷爷在1948年设立该信托时就已经指定是为我这个（女掌）孙女所设立的该信托，方智仁爷爷的该意愿也从未更改，我方敏本人2004年是按照方智仁爷爷的遗嘱继承了该信托。丁姓私人助理及其于家亲朋和我父亲方文海以及我方敏本人都没有任何法律上的责任义务关系。
听说了上海有名的1970年代已经去世的那个于家小姐的信托，是由这个于家小姐的父亲于老先生为其女儿于小姐所设立的，设立时的金额也完全不同，和我方敏的信托根本就不是同一个信托，也不是由同一家机构进行投资管理的，我方敏和已去世的于家小姐也从无任何亲戚关系。我实在不清楚于家小姐的亲戚们究竟为什么要为我方敏的信托争执不休。
Abstract: There was a famous deceased who Miss Yu died in 1970 in Shanghai, her famous Trust was set up by her father Mr.Yu in Hong Komg. Her Trust was a complete different Trust with mine (amount, setttler, etc), and there is no association between me and deceased Miss Yu, I don't know why her relatives need to fight about my Trust.
----2018年9月27日。
据说我妈妈还在，也已经拿到了我给的退休金，据说我父亲也在，但还没有拿到我给的退休金，我自己的基本生活费也没拿到。原因就是2004年7月1日那天付款的公司就是由和每月一万美金（丁姓私人助理及于家）故事的同一个爷爷（南唐中主李璟）给我的信托所投资的。我听说目前还在撇清一些困扰，希望很快。（因为困扰，钱被困扰者给扣下了）。妈妈的那笔退休金不是这个爷爷的信托支付的，而是支付第一年生活费的那家信托，投资了一些退休基金，所以拿到了。如果爸爸的那笔和我也不是同一个爷爷，那他老人家还得再等等了。我的目前是在澄清困扰阶段（第三年的），他的那笔还没听说（如果是第二年的，就应该已经拿到了）。
(I heard my mother still alive and received retirement arrangement which was paid by the first year's providing Trust, I heard my father still alive as well but did not receive anything, similar to my situation. Mine was paid by the current still confusing one (the third year's), I don't know which one paid for my father's, he still need to wait a bit more. All paid on July 1st of 2004 but kept undistributed to us because of confusion.)
老爸爸，如果看到本博客，和我联系或者和妈妈联系，我有点现金可以支援支援你。要是你找到了妈妈，我就不用为你们两人的生活担心了。不用担心妈妈的私生活，妈妈不傻。据说有人坚持说妈妈已经又有了一个小孩，好几岁了，是不是我的亲生妈妈呀？我的亲生妈妈可是已经76岁了。那孩儿是不是她的猫孩儿狗孩儿啊？广播剧制作单位经常用电脑模拟修改真人声音也已经不是秘密。(Papa, please contact me or mama if you read this blog, I can send you some cash. If you can find out where mama is, I would feel much more comfortable about you both. Don't worry about mama's private life, she is never a stupid. The announced child may just be her cat child or dog child. It is not a secret already that radio producing often mimic voices.)
听说那几集广播剧的其中一个制作人就是那个“北京前女友”的女儿或者是其长子，据说其长子是丁姓私人助理的，据说爸爸你可是在晚餐饭桌上亲耳听到过丁姓私人助理就是当着他自己老婆的面以上海话“老二”称谓向方智仁介绍北京那女的。 据说方智仁（或丁姓私人助理自己）也在北京那女的第一个孩子出生后是用电汇送了100元人民币的礼钱。(I heard one of the producer is the Beijing ex-girlfriend's child, I heard her first born is from the private assistant Ding, I heard you heard by your own ears how she was introduced to grandpa by the private assistant in front of his wife. I heard grandpa or private assistant himself had sent her a ￥100 gift for her first child-birth.)
爸爸，估计广播剧如此制作是不希望你和妈妈联系，不是为了闹吃醋而是为了抢夺财产，理由据说是毛阿妹当年（1958年）答应过丁姓助理要和方智仁要求把方智仁想给你的那一份钱归丁姓私人助理。老爸爸，你的退休金安排是我方敏给的，香港的那个信托是方智仁自1948年设立伊始就指定我为唯一受益人的，方智仁也从未更改他是为了我在香港设立了该信托的意愿。我已经就你和妈妈的遭遇在美国报警。(I guess the radio program's producing such saying is to prevent you to reunite with mama in order to get my wealth. The reason I heard is grandma had agreed to ask grandpa give your share of inheritable to private assistant Ding. Papa, your retirement arrangement was paid by my money, I am the granddaughter grandpa specified as the sole beneficiary of the Trust he set up in Hong Kong in 1948. I have contacted laws in U.S. ever since I heard your "death".)
(4：据说我爷爷在1965年去世时，把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产（两万元人名币左右）全部给了丁姓助理，就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年，就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ￥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
----published on September 18th, 2018 )
----2018年9月27日。
很多华人都很好奇，British Convoy 究竟是什么机构？就是英国政府驻外机构的意思，据说就是英国驻美国领事馆在1776年美国独立以前的名称。当时那句话也就是在说“100%全权拥有英国驻美国领事馆”，就是一个英国在美国的移民吵架超级乐时一句笑话而已。
----2018年9月27日。
09-26-2018 The anger towards the possibility that my mother is still alive （我妈妈要是还活着妨碍谁了，哪来这么大的愤怒啊？）
The entire time I have complained this radio program is produced in order to bilk for money, please correct me on if this producing is to clarify confusions or intended to confuse the audience?
Example, who is my mother, if my mother is still alive, why my mother possibly still alive can anger so many people who never had anything to do with her entire life? All I could hear is who deserve to own her retirement arrangement and her medical expense leftovers (or the $400Million wholesome "if deceased already").
This arrangement I made for my parents is the reason I am holding the hope they may still alive even though I have an angry question regarding why it is necessary for them to be as such. I already called laws to help regarding my parents possible situation since 2015, I really have no such need nor such desire to beg some radio program producers' charity to know my parents' news, but I do appreciate any truthful reporting of my parents' whereabouts can truly ease my concern about them, as well as any respect to their privacy for preventing harassment purpose.这份退休金计划安排是我对我父母是否还活着抱有希望的原因，虽然我很气愤为什么他们需要被如此安排。2015年以后我就已经就我父母的处境而报警了，所以我不是仰赖广播剧制作人员的慈善之举才能知道我父母消息，但我很感谢对于他们生活行踪的所有如实报道让我放心他们许多，我也很感激对于他们隐私的尊重以及对于他们安全地保护。
The explanation I can give regarding the anger reflected in this morning's broadcasting:
----Sept 26th, 2018
给爸爸妈妈：
1：我是否是因为个人生活方面的困扰，为了和洛家，福家的女人比飙，才一定要说自己和这两家是一样富裕。
我的回答：从来不是我在比飙。我所宣称的信托财富也从来没有和这两家的名字连在一起过。
我是在2004年6月30日继承那天被告知我所继承的信托中的两个是和这两家的财富规模差不多。如果结婚，就是同等规模的联姻 (same size match if considering marriage)。就是现在已经澄清了的合法的两笔生活费用给付（第一年，第二年）的付款信托。
听说：福家是因为每月一万美金自1997年1月起-2004年左右都是以我的名字（Min Fang)由支付公司所投资的的福家公司的总账支票账户所支付，虽然我本人没有收到，但福家的认为这是我和某某的相识被家里长辈认可的标志而比；洛家的是因为娘家姓氏和我的生活费用给付的支付公司有关联，对我的生活费用给付标准很气愤所以才比。两家都是普遍在比飙，不是一个两个特定人士。
2：我痛骂的原因：他们是在说妈妈如果还活着，就没有其他手段可以谋生。连吃饭，飞机票等恐怕都是以享受外国恋爱换来的。
我的回答：他们就是不敢相信妈妈是嫁了一个富豪的儿子，所以气势汹汹。虽然爸爸没继承到什么钱，爷爷给女儿的生活费也没让妈妈生下女儿就可以一辈子不为柴米油盐犯愁，可是，女儿给的退休金足够妈妈自己坐飞机到处游玩了，也不需要什么谋生手段了。妈妈已经退休了，女儿给的是退休金。在一切困扰澄清之前，请保护好自己。
据说国内就是这么说89年学运时出国的那一批女生的。在海外，从来没有人这么说89年学运出国的女生。美国买一张往返中国的飞机票就只要900美金，很便宜，就算是借款，她们这些女生在中餐馆做做工，两个星期就可以还得起，不需要用自己年轻的外国恋爱来换一张飞机票钱或者路费。
----Sept 26th, 2018
09-25-2018 89年学运同学为了Viagra的智慧产权就有和我杠上了& 桥口大学的那个马一茜 （Tracy Ma ）
今天早上的广播可以听出海外一些89年学运对当年的那份怀恋，当年89年的那一代，都是自己的孩子都快要大学毕业的一代人，如今还能在广播上听见当年自己上大学时的“同学们，我们上街游行去吧”的那一份认真和执着。
我对今天早上播出的意见就是: 作为警界从业人员，他们为什么说他们自己是美国法律管辖权的解释权威而不再只是法律的执行者？在美国，法律的管辖解释权争议应该是属于美国最高法院法官来解释的。
今天早上提到的就是我在Viagra里的那一份智慧产权收入被人提走是否属于美国警方查办案件范围，89年学运同学说就只是属于民事纠纷，警方不会理睬。
我听说的是美国药业公司已经就我方敏是否有智慧产权以及如何评估的做出了解释，89年学运的同学是在质疑美国药业公司所做的评估不公吗？可是拿钱的那一方根本就也没参与Viagra的研究也没对Viagra的研究做出贡献，就只是个制药行业的从业人员，为什么这种某名奇妙直接拿钱就变成了民事纠纷，依据是什么呀？
如果我不满意药业公司对我所作贡献的评估，或者参与Viagra的研究人员不同意药业公司所作的评估结果，按照法律常识，属于民事纠纷。也就是说，这笔钱，要么是我的，要么就是参与研究的其他人员的，或者就是专利买家公司不应该支付的款项。拿钱的人所拿的应该是什么钱，必须从Viagra的专利所得中支付？89年学运的同学有什么药业方面的专业知识能力以及权威可以在Viagra的专利产权评估的权威性上发表如此言论？
据悉，有华人坚持是该药业公司的权威人士对我所发表言论极为反感，我的态度是请给我一个电邮进行符合法律的权威性的纠正。我的电邮地址：somebodyinMA@gmail.com
----2018年9月25日
还有，就是上海人马一茜，就是以前硚口大学（BridgeportUniversity）的那个Tracy Ma，据说还在四处拨打电话散步对我方敏仇恨。据说她的做法被她的中国领导人“姻亲”，开玩笑说这是在从事当年中国共产党地下组织的工作。
如果这是真的，作为马一茜可能是在违反美国法律散布仇恨这种做法的可能的受害人，我方敏想问一下，这是在鼓励马一茜破坏美国法律甚至推翻美国政府吗？当年的中国共产党的地下组织就是用这种方法宣传中国当时执政的国民党政府是个贪污腐败根本没有法律只有贪赃枉法的政府。当年的中国共产党地下组织就是用这种方式成功推翻了中国国民政府，所以我才问，中国政府高官是在鼓励用这种方法散步仇恨就是应该吗，目的究竟是什么？有否想过这种做法有可能在中国推翻中国共产党自己领导的政府吗？为什么在中国共产党已经取得中国960万平方公里土地的政治领导权的情况下，不能用中国共产党自己所制订的中华人民共和国的法律来解决各种矛盾？作为中国国家法治建设的领导人，是否认为马一茜的做法是在违反美国的法律？
----2018年9月25日
关于康州硚口大学毕业的上海人马一茜（Tracy Ma, Tiffany Ma），华人社区有很多说法。
我的回应：2004年7月以前，我经常去她家里做客不是因为恨她。而是当她是个可以一起聊聊天的，但绝不愿意让她到我家里翻箱底的这么一个人。我当时从未听说过串婚，也打心眼里不赞同她的婚姻观，她的方姓丈夫虽也是籍贯宁波镇海的上海人，但我当时从未听说有此亲戚(现在听说也确实没有血缘关系)，她丈夫也是马一茜向我介绍是她丈夫的，所以我是在2004年6月份在新洲一对夫妻都不是上海人的大学同学家里提到马一茜小孩一事，但从未向她丈夫举报，因为不是她丈夫朋友也确实不知该如何处理才合适。
2004年7月1日据说有提到马一茜，因为当时的美国移民法改革，她的方姓丈夫虽是美国公民但不能帮她解决美国居留身份问题，我当时挺乐意帮帮她解决她的身份（现在听说她的身份是别人帮忙解决的），但不乐意给她丈夫一笔钱。据说有些华人对此很愤怒，我就很奇怪，我当时是马一茜的朋友，我就只愿意帮她解决一下她的美国居留身份却会愿意给她丈夫一大笔钱，为什么呀？想让她丈夫把她当垃圾给扔出去啊？我当时并不恨马一茜，我为什么会这么处理？
很多人说，如果马一茜在2004年7月以前对我还是很友善，我为什么在2004年6月把她说成那样？因为确实就她的婚姻观对她有看法。我是听马一茜自己说她丈夫对她有多好，我是听马一茜自己说她是自己如何坚决愿意和以前的男朋友分手，就为和她的丈夫可以正正经经结婚生孩子的，我是听马一茜自己说她的丈夫如何愿意做两份餐馆工让她可以不用出去做工的 , 我从未像很多女人对马一茜不用出去做工很反感，就是因为我是亲眼看见是她丈夫自己的态度是他自己很愿意他自己多苦点可以让他自己的老婆小孩舒服点，然后我是自己发现原来她的小孩不是她丈夫亲生的。
就是因为我确实因为她的婚姻观对她本人有很多负面看法，平时很多不会说的与我无关的小细节，那天的负面态度也都体现了。但我当时很清楚，就算我对她有很多负面看法，她的婚姻问题还是不应该由我介入，2004年7月1日那天我当时还是乐意帮她解决身份问题让她不用依赖婚姻。
2004年7月底我搬到麻州波士顿后，马一茜对我当时在摩根大通银行工作的恶意仇恨宣泄似的干扰是我从那时起就不再和马一茜交往的原因，马一茜在我2007年1月离开摩根大通银行之后持续不懈的仇恨表达是我永远认为马一茜很恶劣的原因。
所谓的上海心理学界对此的一些解释，可能是基于他们都是上海人很清楚丁姓私人助理1967-1996年的家庭财务如何优越，而非对于已经远在美国多年的我方敏有多少了解。
------2018年11月2日。
09-24-2018 今天早上播出了中国出入境管理局永久禁止方敏入境 (Forbidden to enter China announced this morning on the radio program)
听说了今天早上中国出入境管理局雇佣演员宣布了永久禁止方敏入境。我是接到过中国领事馆的一个电话通知，是有这么一个文件，起因于国内执法单位发现有我的假护照。我已报告美国警方我从未认识该案的涉案人员也从未参与提供私人资料。不知今天早上的播出是否和此有关，但我也不是太在意。
I heard this morning's broadcasting about the announcement from the Chinese Bureau of Exit and Entry Administration, the announcement is to forbid me to enter China permanently. I did receive a phone call from NYC consulate about a forged passport caught by Chinese law enforcement earlier this year. I have reported to the U.S. law people that I never heard of the involved personnel and I never participated by providing my personal information. I am not certain if this morning's broadcasting is because of this but it does not bother me a lot.
旁人看我的处境就是：如果我有钱，是中国政府在海内海外号召华人对我恶意攻击；如果我没钱，我是既没钱也没有任何亲朋好友或者任何工作学习需要去中国大陆，包括旅游在内。所有国内交往过没有交往过的人士名单基本上都已经一网打尽，全部通过广播剧高调宣布和我过去没有现在没有将来也永远不会有任何关系了。
From outsiders, my situation is if I have money, it is from the Chinese government who organized all these malicious attacks me as a person. If I have no money, I have no friends, nor associated personnel, nor associated any sort of organization, nor any sort of contacts to be a reason for me to go to China, not even as a tourist. All-inclusively in an almost complete list that has announced loudly on the radio program to have no association with me, in the past, at present, and in the future.
我本人看法：全部都是经过中国政府，美国人阿尔伯特·高尔和美国洛克菲勒家一些人士进行组织安排和协调而恶意制造的舆论事件。就广播剧制作单位的所有这些做法，我都已经在美国报警。
From myself, All these conducted malicious shit-throwing on the media are organized by this administration of Chinese government, American Albert Gore and Rockefellers, I have already contacted U.S. law enforcement about all these illegal activities in radio program producing.
美国有法律，我就只要投诉向警方投诉美国的阿尔伯特·高尔及洛克菲勒家一些人士是否是在通过广播剧制作单位恶意性骚扰或者进行仇恨犯罪就可以，都是美国联邦刑事法律所规定的罪名。所以，如果确实是阿尔伯特·高尔或者洛克菲勒家一些人士有参与制造并传播仇恨，我会受到美国法律保障。美国政府是誓言捍卫法制国家的。
The United States is a lawful country so that I just need to complain to the laws if American Albert Gore or if Rockefellers have conducted malicious sexual harassment or even hate crime against me, both are federal crimes. So, I will be protected by laws if I have been the victim of the sexual harassment or the hate crime that possibly conducted by the American Albert Gore or the Rockefellers. The U.S. government has sworn to keep the U.S. a lawful country.
至于中国方面，如果确实是这一届的中国政府在通过广播剧参与针对我方敏的敲诈勒索恐吓威胁并破坏名誉的一系列中国刑法所界定的刑事犯罪活动，不准我入境中国的宣布，对我的人身安全来说，不是什么负面宣布。
About China, if it is indeed this administration of the Chinese government who conducted all these crimes as Extortion, threatening, blackmail and name harm against me, it is not a negative announcement at all to forbid me to enter China, as long as I won't be safe from being a victim defined by the Chinese criminal laws but possibly victimized by the Chinese government, this is from my personal safety point of views.
在美国，通过大众传媒制造谎言散布仇恨，已经超越了美国宪法所赋予的言论自由。
原因：不是每一个美国公民都可以任意凭一张美国公民身份证就可以走进任何一家大众传媒广播公司随便发表个人看法，所以，在大众传媒的广播上发表个人看法已经超越美国宪法所赋予每一个美国公民的的平等美国公民权力，我个人认为应该不属于是美国宪法所保障的每一个美国公民的，平等的，言论自由的权利。
In the United States, to spread maliciousness, negativeness or even hate emotions on public media is beyond the right of freedom of speech.
Reason: Not every single U.S citizen can freely walk into a public media radio broadcasting company to express the personal opinion on a public radio broadcasting media so that it is not the right of freedom granted by the U.S. Constitution that supposes to be a same equal right to all U.S. citizens. I personally think freely publish the personal opinion on a not free-accessible-to-all public media is not in the scope of freedom of speech as the right from the U.S. Constitution.
09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语）
----2018年9月24日。
09-23-2018 Why my parents haven't contacted me if they still alive? （如果爸爸妈妈还活着，他们怎么还没和我联系啊？）
A lot would ask me why my parents don't come to Boston to unite with me if they both still alive. I assume one big possibility is the financial situation. I have been pennies that is truly no cash at all until I called law's help since 2015. I am still in the situation that taking an air flight will make me ponder. （很多人可能都会问我，如果我父母还活着，为什么他们不来波士顿找我。我估计最大的可能就是他们的经济状况。我2015年前就一直是一分钱现金都没有知道报警后才逐渐好转。我现在也还是没有坐飞机去外地的经济能力。）
Another possible reason is unrecognizable. Photos I published on this web blog are both unrecognizable to my parents if they both still alive. If they met me in person, I am possibly recognizable to them because my appearance resembles my mother when she was in her 50s. My body figure is unrecognizable. I assume they are possibly the same, recognizable to the family when in person.（另一个可能的原因就是因为癌症治疗期间，长相变得认不出来了。我在这个博客上发表的两张照片我父母就不会敢相认。如果他们还在，在街上遇见我就有可能认得出来，我现在的样子很像我妈妈50多岁的时候。我的身形还是完全认不出来。我估计他们也是差不多，但家里人见了面能认得出来。）
The third possible reason is why they are in this shabby situation if the daughter should have made a lot of money from the radio program worldwide broadcasting. Well, the daughter has been in a same shabby situation because “1) so many people deserve to take the daughter's intellectual income to live a much better life", 2) a lot confused families have been concerned if my living expenses payments are actually from their family wealth, so that law people have to withhold the intellectual income discovered and payments cleared from confusions till the daughter is clarified to be safe to have the free access to the money.（第三个原因可能就是他们难以理解为什么自己女儿的广播剧全世界热播挣了好多钱，他们怎么过的这么惨？因为 1) 有太多人“就是应该拿我的钱过一份应得的好日子”，2）还有很多人很担心我的生活费用给付是不是从他们家的财产里付出来的，所以一些已明确是我的智慧产权的收入以及一些已经澄清困扰的生活费用给付都是在被警方保护着直到女儿我可以安全拿钱为止，女儿我现在经济上也是一样的惨兮兮。）
The third possible reason is why they are in this shabby situation if the daughter should have made a lot of money from the radio program worldwide broadcasting. Well, the daughter has been in a same shabby situation because “1) so many people deserve to take the daughter's intellectual income to live a much better life", 2) a lot confused families have been concerned if my living expenses payments are actually from their family wealth, so that law people have to withhold the intellectual income discovered and payments cleared from confusions (two out of four already) till the daughter is clarified to be safe to have the free access to the money.（第三个原因可能就是他们难以理解为什么自己女儿的广播剧全世界热播挣了好多钱，他们怎么过的这么惨？因为 1) 有太多人“就是应该拿我的钱过一份应得的好日子”，2）还有很多人很担心我的生活费用给付是不是从他们家的财产里付出来的，所以一些已明确是我的智慧产权的收入以及一些已经澄清困扰的生活费用给付(4个中的两个已经澄清）都是在被警方保护着直到女儿我可以安全拿钱为止，女儿我现在经济上也是一样的惨兮兮。）
If I have this much blessing already, why the younger generation grandfathers still blessing me handsomely? I have been the extra-son that nobody heard of for each of this blessing-story generation that blessed with a non-heir-son's size. It was so obvious in my great-grandmother's generation that all my great-grandfather's children were from her but she did not mind at all when there was one extra-child who was blessed with a Trust.（我都已经有好些爷爷给我钱了，为什么后面的爷爷还给我钱？我一直都是哪个多出来的一个不知哪儿冒出来的非继承人儿子。在分家产时也顺便给我设一个信托也就是给我送个礼物的意思。这在我曾祖母那一代就特别明显，我曾祖父所有的孩子都是我曾祖母生的，等到分家产时，还是又多出了一个非继承人儿子的信托，而我曾祖母还一点都没在意还一点都不生气这不知从哪儿冒出来的一个孩子分到了理应是她孩子们的财产。她其实很清楚，这多出来的一个也是她的孩子--- 她的曾孙女我。）
My grandfather put the majority of his wealth into that Trust in Hong Kong because the beneficiary girl (me) would be born as his heir-granddaughter so that he entrusted the heir's share together with the family traditional blessing in that Trust. I am the heir of my grandfather's line of this generation. （我爷爷方智仁是把他绝大部份的财产都给放在了他在香港替我设立的信托里，是因为受益人我是他孙女也是他的继承人，他给我设的这个信托既是他给我的礼物也是他给我作为继承人的继承人份额。我是方智仁这一支这一代的继承人。）
I am proud of my historical family, and I am blessed I came from a loving happy marriage. I already told everyone my family has been messy-looking since ancient times which gets messier and messier in the teleconferences in 2004, now I know it was since the Southern Tang dynasty which was about a thousand years ago, my Southern Tang Emperor grandfathers were famous in our hometown Nanjing area for their street-vendor appearances if not wearing their crowns.（我很为我的家世而骄傲，我很幸运我是出生在有爱的婚姻里。我在2004年就已经向全世界广而告之我们一家就是看着是瘪瘪遢遢的，现在我可是知道这瘪遢是从一千年前南唐时期就已经是这样了。我南唐皇帝的爷爷们在我的家乡南京是有名的不带王冠在街上晃悠的时候看着就像是街上的混混。）
I thought I already prepared the entire world about my family's messy appearance since 2004, why would I have any problem with my parents when I am the same messy? Definitely not being proud of being messy, I am a girl and I know for sure a complete change-over only takes a phone call to a good shopping specialist once I receive my living-expenses providing. （我还以为我都已经在2004年就给全世界就此打了个预防针，我哪里还会在乎我父母及我自己这瘪遢样子？这说法绝不是在为瘪遢骄傲，我是个女孩子，我很清楚一旦我的生活费用给付拿到，想要改头换面也就只需要打个电话给个好一点的购物专家就可以了。）
09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语）
----Sept 23rd, 2018
09-22-2018 中国组织的所谓演出似乎就是对着全球华人肆意当个诅咒的和哭丧的
中国自古就有家里死人的要声势浩大的哭丧表演的传统，而中国组织的这场演出号称是一切都是真实，也就是哭丧也是因为有真实丧事表演真实哭丧，针对真实人物表达真实诅咒。
从今年（2018年）的农历年三十开始，就有传言到处都是一片华人在表演嚎啕大哭的声音，这嚎啕丧哭直到农历新年结束，不知中国人民共和国如此表演哭丧，是中国政府里谁死了或者谁该死。
今天早上据说是电影演员陈坤和董洁在真实的表达诅咒，以他们自己一辈子永远不可能有个真正的家来表达对所谓如果某某有小孩是真实，这人也就一辈子只能如此地诅咒，就只是不知他们究竟是在诅咒谁。我方敏没声没音，就是因为还行。孩子今后和我一起生活也好，不和我一起生活也好，都是有人照顾也不担心孩子委屈，最多也就是担心孩子和我没感情或者被人教唆着对我狠三恨四的，我就自己想开，要是如此就再生几个和我亲的。
我现在也就是等着目前警方就我方敏是否被谋财者绑架勒索的司法调查有个眉目，我本人目前不是太清楚究竟是否是司法调查。/我所投诉的就是为什么我拿不到我所继承的信托所支付的生活费用，反正有人在处理。等目前这些事情结束，就凭我自己爷爷的祝福就是够资格找个年轻英俊的做个polygamist过我自己的甜美好日子，他们这些广而告之的诅咒也就是一场狗急跳墙的干嚎而已。
海外一直有传言，名导演张艺谋是中国这场实景演出的总导演，而我还听说我本人被广播剧公开宣布不可能是08奥运创意人就是因为张艺谋的老婆公开私下都如此表达。我对张艺谋的意见就是：瞧瞧，08奥运开幕式的特点是炫美华丽人文精粹，如今这广播剧整个就是哭穷讨饭拿钱来，摆明是在表达所谓张艺谋特色，就这，他老婆还说08奥运开幕式不是我的创意。
有人说最近这一阵子，广播剧制作都有海外89年学运的女生参与，那话就更多了。按照他们这些海外89年学运的宣布，我方敏早就已经被美国政府按照讹诈罪名起诉判罪被关在美国的联邦监狱里了。所有国内所听说的在海外华裔社区的种种说法，统统都是这些海外89年学运的宣布和分析。这些89年学运当年在国内是气势如虹轰轰烈烈，来到海外又都是特别人物特别待遇，据说女生们还都是被外族裔男士热追过，估计是实在难以平复那一腔的凭什么他们都不是些富豪名流的愤怒。
我也确实没看见过他们这些89年学运的。你们听听他们的计谋都是些什么呀，就是只要找个政府工作，以政府工作人员名义再以策略计谋的名头做这做那，只要木已成舟，就算是把个活人给上了手铐脚镣直接关在个黑屋子里，只要警察可以按照策略计谋的要求坚决就是不管，或者警察就是他们自己，老百姓就是一点办法都没有，一点办法都没有。你们说这是聪敏妙计谋还是刑事渎职罪？海外89年学运人士在海外华裔社区就是这个名声。当年二十岁的大学生，可以想象会如此幼稚，现在都快五十岁了，这是在表达他们才是真正有本事的啊？
广播剧上的海外华人所表达似乎全是如此，要是谈到我所享受的美国政府福利里的粮食卷政府楼，就只谈美国的福利相关法律说我不符合条件，却坚决不提我是美国的劳工相关法律所界定的理应从广播剧里有30亿-45亿美金收入的美国公民在法律协调期间符合享受美国政府帮助条件，他们还全都不是审批我是否够资格享受美国政府福利的美国政府工作人员，他们都是美国政府工作人员，就是都和我没什么关系，全部都是气势汹汹，必须要让我在餐馆做个洗碗的工作每个月可以挣个一千美金吃口饱饭。
我还听到，广播剧在宣传，要是我母亲还在，就必须得让外族裔人士给操了才能体现美国是个婚姻自由的国家，我本人认为我妈妈如果还在，就只能从英国王储威廉王子本人及美国的四星将军David Petraeus本人那里学学美国英国的真正婚姻自由。只有这两个人和我传过绯闻的人士是众所周知我非常非常喜欢的，一直很为其吃醋的高质量又有钱有品的高级上流社会 人物。要是他们两人在已经明确表态坚决永远不要我方敏之后，却愿意和我目前已经76岁的亲生妈妈恋爱恋爱的，这才会是被广大听众所认可的真正所有人都推崇的真正的恋爱自由，这才是由他们两个人所坚决支持的的广播剧所宣扬的真正的恋爱自由。其他任何人确实是统统都不够资格表达什么才是真正的恋爱自由。
妈妈，你要是还活着，你就只有是和英国王储威廉王子本人上床恋爱，你才可以被我理解，你就只是想要追求自由，你就只是想要证明你有恋爱的自由。全世界都知道，我很为英国王储威廉王子本人而吃醋不已。美国四星将军的年龄实在是有点不够资格体现真正的恋爱自由，就比我亲生妈妈小了十二岁而已，算什么呀。
我本人态度也就是：你们以绑架方式以表演手段污蔑造谣诽谤破化我方敏名誉，甚至以政府工作人员或者警方人员名义散布不实消息，就为毁灭我的一份感情一段婚姻并威胁我孩子的安全是我向美国警方投诉你们的原因，如果你们自己就是警方，你们自己也很清楚，美国警方也是有内部督察署的。
我方敏从来就不是嫁入豪门，我本人比我孩子爹家里富裕，我不是嫁入豪门也不担心害怕，今后我也还是那一份不愁没有英俊陪伴的浪漫婚姻家庭人生，你们的喧闹也就是一片过眼烟云，你们自己也很清楚，美国是一切法律。
----2018年9月22日。
09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments
A lot of people must have asked why I don't defend myself on the radio, I heard the explanation given is I lost my voice because of glasshouse cancer which is a true statement. I have complained about a lot of harassments to keep me in this "heavily flu-alike accented unrecognizable voice".
And, who are those attorneys on the radio? A lot are indeed sent by the female who publicly thrown a lot of shits at me to prove she is the real sexuality. Now you can imagine why it sounds some defenses are there but always effectively put me in the situation that has been "an overall disadvantaged enough" status. Some would say, but there are great points sometimes as well, well, that is my confusion as well if the intention is to keep the family name a bit decent.
Alright, but where are my attorneys if I am wealthy enough and financially independent enough as I claimed? They are obviously around because I am not crushed to pieces yet even though my financial identity is very confusing to the government sector as well. So, I am the one growing more and more comfortably quiet to wait for the things to be sorted out.
Exactly, what is the problem between me and the big family name? The maiden names.
Most involved are from maiden names that historically associated with my "financial identity". They are the Missy from the confused families who are so pissed off about my $400Million yearly living expenses providing and more. As you heard, the education from this radio program is the family name is the protection even if you performed a bank robbery as long as you make it clear in front the objective is the Chinese woman Min Fang's money only. And it seems the family names have dedicated promoting themselves as the role models for conducting real robberies to prove "nothing could be wrong even if it is truly a bank robbery (or murder for money) as long as Min Fang is the target." So, as I announced on this blog, I send the family names to the U.S. law enforcement already because I am so confused by this so impressive motive. But I did not call U.S. law enforcement's help on why every pissed off maiden name has been announced the true sexuality to the one & only family name I ever met, because I am indeed "not interested in a leftover sexuality."
So, what kind of confusion can be so impressively strong? I am not the person aware of a lot as well except the confusion is all about one company that has the $10,000 dollars per month story.
These maiden names anger has been:
They are the true owners of the paying company.
My anger has been:
I did not pick up any payment-checks in person from the paying company. All those payments were according to instructions from the paying companies' lawfully registered investor-owners. All by my entrusting groups' arrangement.
The result:
I have been shitted all over worldwide, and intended service providers have been harassed If dare to give out the payment money or provide any paid already service.
My hypothesis question:
Is the paying company the same company they truly own?
Evidential question: Why not confronting the paying company they truly own?
The action I have taken:
1: I asked U.S. laws protection on possible severe harassments and more.
2: I ask all confused families to do me a big favor to direct all their confusion to the paying company instead of me nor intended service providers.
By the way, why there is such an impressive expectation for me to pay to be disgusted as the never wanted who deserved to bow to the true sexuality?
Well, Rumored it was from the private assistant's family this was how my grandmother was requested by the private assistant's wife in exchange for my grandmother to be acknowledged as the private assistant's woman.
I have to say my grandmother was truly not pretty at all and truly fat enough after four children. Ever since marriage, she was the one under enormous pressure to be replaced instead of being wanted even by outsiders for most of her prime years, or more accurately, the entire marriage years. After all these years under my grandfather's "charitable touches out of the duty as the husband betrothed-before-birth" to share four children between them, she must have been desperate enough and proud enough when my grandfather finally made her the housewife with the family savings account.
These are truly a granddaughter's comments from the story I heard that she actually accepted my grandfather's private assistant who she was so despised as "smelly stunk". I am definitely not after her in every bit and my grandfather had paid it ￥20，000 RMB very clear in 1965.
*My grandmother died in 1958 or so. She was betrothed to my grandfather before both were born. My grandfather was a famous playboy refused to divorce his ugly wife for his love to his firstborn ( my father ).
(4：据说我爷爷在1965年去世时，把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产（两万元人名币左右）全部给了丁姓助理，就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年，就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ￥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
----published on September 18th, 2018 )
The Explanation to the Chinese community why I am the sole beneficiary? （对华裔社区所好奇的：为什么我是唯一的受益人？）
The answer: Inheriting according to the will (wills). （答案：是按遗嘱继承）。
爸爸妈妈：你们要是活得还挺好，我的门牌号（apartment#）是2494.
----Sept 21st, 2018
09-21-2018 Trust-Inheriting and Trust-Investing (信托继承和信托投资)
今天听懂了一些2004年7月1日参与会议者的那一份激和急“我坐在那里为什么没有继承到东西？” (Finally I understand why there are people so angry about how come sitting there as well on July 1st of 2004 but haven't inherited anything yet?)
他们不是在和我抢东西，他们以为那是一个集体继承仪式，所继承的不是他们家里老人留下的钱，而是他们自己过去交往过的社交朋友或者恋爱经历在那人自己去世时以继承的方式送给了他们什么礼物。虽然他们在2004年以前从未想过，但如果这个朋友有送礼物，他们怎么就是不可以或者就是不准拿这份礼物。(They are not trying to get what is mine. They thought it was a group inheriting that day, the inheritable was not from their family-seniors but from their own deceased social friends or romances as a gift. Even though they never expected such gifting before 2004, but why they are not allowed to inherit if there is such a gift and where are their inheritable now? )
我本人是在2004年6月30日继承了我的父系爷爷们替我所办理的信托，是按照遗嘱继承的。我当时虽然是在一个大的电话会议上，但不在同一个电话线上(類似一线, 二线这种), 而是另外一个电话会议。所以虽然当时有中国代表在场(在大的电话会议上)，但没有人知道我是否继承。我本人没有听说2004年7月1日时候有人是否继承。我确实不清楚. (I inherited some Trusts set up for me by my father-side grandfathers, it was according to each of my grandfather's will. Even though I was in a big teleconference but I was on a different line (such as line1. line 2, etc) with my grandfathers' entrusting groups so that nobody knew if I did inherit anything even though there were representatives from Chinese government presented in the big teleconference at the same time. I did not hear if there was such inheriting that day so I really don't know. )
Regarding this morning's some companies' ownership argument which is if the companies are investments of a Trust (Trusts) I inherited, I am not the person knows what might be the confusion. I am the acknowledged beneficiary person of the Trust (Trusts), but I am absolutely oblivious about its business entity's investing. Please direct all your confusion to the company. (至于今天早上有关公司所有权的争议, 即一些公司是否是由我所继承的一些信托所投资的, 我本人确实不清楚所争议的是什么. 我本人是法律所认可的这些信托的唯一受益人, 但我本人对于这些信托的投资运作完全不清楚. 请向引发争议的公司提出所有的困惑疑問.)
** 妈妈：要是你还在，以你自身经历 就不用太担心爸爸, 我听说他只有基本生活费，但有吃有住。我给的退休金还没有收到。我也在找爸爸的消息。听说爸爸也是因自身经历一直在找你的消息, 我也因为自身经历担心你和爸爸的生活, 已经向警方求助。
还有，听说有人一定要邀请老二的老婆或他们两人到美国，估计会有一些踩死你们的一些活动，请保护好自己。我已经就邀请方（据传是一个洛克菲勒夫人）如此执意介入我的私人生活及私人财物问题是否已是骚扰犯罪行为而报警处理。
另外，据说有人说爸爸是吃一口多一口，那可能和丁姓私人助理一家有关。听说爷爷就是因为答应了把你的那份两万左右的钱给他之后，才被救护车送进医院的，不是同一天。爷爷估计清楚才会说在医院说都怪他自己花钱太多了。
都是不知是否真实，但请保护好自己。我自己也已经向警方投诉华裔社区不知为什么就是不准我花我自己的钱，老逼着我去做低工资的工作挣口饭吃。
----Sept 20th, 2018
09-19-2018 My living-enough mother and Trust-Inheriting
If alive, my mother should be over 76 years old and my father would be over 86 years old, why I need to scream about my mother's sexuality? That is for the leftover portion from the $400Million per year medical expense. So, I make my announcement here: All the accumulated leftover from the $400Million per year medical expenses of my both parents should be transferred back to my name.
----Min Fang 09/19/2018
Without this $400Million per year medical expenses arrangement, my mother's sexuality advantage in legal immigration status and retirement arrangement would be only attractive to "shabby looking man" or the truly homeless, this is indeed true from my own personal experiences. This is because every man else would be wanted by a so much better female that even touching or talking would arouse serious jealous reaction (from my real-life experience), but money hand-over would be tolerable and expected (from rumor-stories style education I have received).
So, I say to my obviously living-enough mother: Don't worry about your sexuality, whoever has an eye for you normally would be persuaded away before a Mister can have an opportunity to see you close enough or before you have ever heard of the Mister. This comforting message is from my own real rich experiences.
Also, the confusion between family-inheriting and Trust-inheriting. The questions are:
1: How can I choose Trust-Inheriting when I have relatives.
I did not choose. It was chosen by the deceased, never by the living. Inheriting is the process of the wealth's ownership change. Family-inheriting means the ownership immediate change from the deceased to the living upon death, by will or no will from the deceased.
Trust-Inheriting means the deceased had intentionally transferred the ownership to the intermedium party to look after the wealth before ownership to be transferred to the intended beneficiary by the will (the Settler's letter). The Trust-inheriting normally happen years after the death.
2: Why I did not inform relatives.
I did forget my inheriting in 2004 so I did not inform anyone. Also, I have no contact information to contact nor inheriting related information in 2015. So I informed everyone on this blog since 2017.
3: Why my brother's wife is not my in-law.
My brother stays in his marriage as his free will even though I heard it is public already that she mothers another man's child. I doubted if this freedom of marriage was the excuse that caused my parents' death-certificates ousted from my parents' own apartment. I am not willing to risk my own living nor my own life as long as I have this doubts. And I already wrote letters to the related places to announce myself have nothing to do with my brother's marriage and his in-laws. So, my brother's wife is not my in-law is factually effective.
4: What will happen if my brother's wife is invited to insult me as you heard on the radio wherever I need to present by those so publicly well-known enemies of mine?
As you heard on the radio, she has been obviously strongly supported by her child's birth father to insult his wife publicly. She may also have been supported by the similar party from the Rockefeller name for possibly similar reasons to insult their own.
I have nothing to do with all parties above and I don't care, but I have "entitled" my brother's wife an "outer public-bathroom" from her mating-pregnancy rumor, and I don't like to be insulted as you have heard on the radio as well for whatever true reasons.
So, I would understand the invitation to her is the public eviction message to me from the host for a lady-inappropriate reason if I am a visitor to a non-public-mating related event.
If the event is hosted in my own place, I would have to ask the inviting patron to publicly expose the personal private area to be convinceable of the true needs for the invitation to the entitled "outer public-bathroom" to a non-public-mating related event to be evicted for mating with her.at some other places.
----September 19th, 2018
09-18-2018 有关私人助理的传言以及月经血计谋 (Rumors about the private assistant and the strategy of period blood)
听说了今天早上的播出是中国政府代表所强调的：如果我妈妈还活着，就没可能没有她自己的男人。据说这是中国政府所推广的“这才叫婚姻自由”。
I heard of this morning's broadcasting that Chinese government's representatives emphasized: If my mother indeed still alive, it is impossible that she still does not have a man of her own. It is rumored this is the theme of this propaganda from the Chinese government "Freedom of marriage."
据说特意会以这种中国聪明中国策略让我父母必须以已经死亡身份离开中国，就可以让我父母永远不再是夫妻而让他们自己这群靠着舔女人月经血才能有口饭吃的可以有机会吃口饱饭。所以我说中国政府的这一政治局根本就是特别选拔的全世界都知道的典型传统的妓院婊子才养得出来杂种组成的公共厕所政治局。
It is rumored that it was from the Chinese strategy and the Chinese smartness that my parents left China with real death certificates. It was intended to break their marriage in order to fill-in replacements from their own who are willing to suck money out from the period blood. This is precisely the reason I say this administration is the specially selected group, according to worldwide standard of traditions, the public bathroom of whore-born mother-fuckers.
所以我说这届中国政府根本是篡党夺权，就因我从自己的亲身经历，我很相信海外传言他们就是靠着共舔一泉月经血才被特意提拔成为这一届中国政府中共中央政治局的，他们的才华就是共舔一腔月经血，哪里会听得懂党纪国法或者科学技术都是什么意思，你就听见他们在使劲用中国外交部中国人民解放军的实力帮着卖髀抢鲷了。那才叫只要广播一响，全世界都知道那是中国那一群口舔月经血的外交解放大军都是在帮着脱衣卖髀呐。
This is exactly the reason I say this administration of the Chinese government is the result of usurping, it is from my own personal experiences, I truly believe it is possible as rumored that this administration (Central Political Committee) is specially grouped from one-woman's period-blood enjoyers. If their talents recognized are enjoying one-woman's period as a group, why should anyone expect them to understand laws or regulations, or anything else? All one could hear is the joint-power from the Chinese Military and Chinese Liberation Army and how hard it is to liberate the breasts and butts for everyone to enjoy the joy of sucking some period-blood. It has been such a phenomenon for the world to listen what a joy it would be to be liberated for period-blood sucking.
所以，我只好郑重声明：我替我母亲我父亲所安排的一切都是不可以由其婚姻另一方或其他子女所继承福利，包括目前及未来的医疗保险及退休金房子等所有安排。我希望我自己的父母如果还活着，看到这个博客可以保护好他们自己。
So, I make my announcement here: All the arrangements I made for my birth parents (including medical insurance, retirement financial arrangement, housing, etc) cannot be inherited by their marriage partners if they have, nor their other child, nor step-children if they have. I wish they could read this blog to protect themselves if they are still alive.
全是这种妓院狗屎公共马桶货言论居然被公然叫做新文化运动。完全违反本人意愿，被政府及文化部门公然绑架强迫逼迫所谓名人必须做这种娼妓文化运动的表率，就因为他们自己是一群真真实实婊子养的妓女妓男。
All these low cast shits are now be called new culture movement. Completely ignore one's own willingness, but purely abusive abducting efforts from the government to force so-called Famous people to be the Role Models of the True Shits, just because themselves are the true whore-born toilets' shits.
我是不会愿意看见我爷爷对我的祝福被靠舔月经血的给坑蒙拐骗了。我妈要是还在，还真是已经够老了，76岁了，没那月经血可以被人舔，我也绝不会用我爷爷给我的钱给那恶心讨饭的一口舔了月经的饱饭钱。
I am not willing to watch my grandfathers' blessing to me to be abused by those period-suckers. If my mother still alive, she is really old enough (76 years old now) to have any period blood. I refuse to pay any of my grandfathers' entrusted money I inherited to such disgusting period-sucker beggars.
----方敏于2018年9月18日。
据说，这些都是因为我爷爷的那个私人助理和我奶奶有性交关系。1949年时,已育有四名子女的我奶奶都已经37岁了又黑又丑又胖，但就是嘴馋爱偷吃。我听说的：
It is rumored, all these was because that my grandmother had sexually involved with the private assistant. Being a mother of four, my not-pretty at all grandmother was already 37 years old and fat enough, but it seems she just had this lust-appetite. What I have heard are the following:
1： 据说我奶奶和那个私人助理的偷情关系是我父亲1956年在上海长居期间，就是不够资格参加我爷爷付款的每日家庭晚餐的原因，而由我奶奶自愿自己留在家里做点给我父亲吃吃，然后我奶奶再自己一个人加入由我爷爷付款的家庭晚餐。
!: It is rumored this sexual involvement was the reason that my father was not allowed to attend daily family dinner function which had been financed entirely by my grandfather. It is said that my grandmother would voluntarily prepare something for my father to eat at home but herself would join the family dinner function later.
2：我知道的，我奶奶共育有四名子女，我父亲和我父亲的小妹妹随我爷爷长相，我父亲的大妹妹和弟弟随我奶奶长相。我听说的：据说是我奶奶自己对我父亲的弟弟说丁姓私人助理就和父亲一样。但丁姓私人助理是在我父亲的弟弟已经8岁以后才被我爷爷雇佣的。
2: What I know: My grandmother gave birth to total four children, my father and my father's younger sister were obviously resemble my grandfather, the other two obviously resemble my grandmother herself. What I heard: It was my grandmother herself told her younger son that the private assistant was the father equivalent. But the private assistant was hired when my father's younger brother was already about 8 years old.
3：我爷爷据说是在1948年替我在香港设立了五百万大洋（一千五百万美金）的信托后，就把家里剩余财产（20万左右的大洋）全部放在了我奶奶的名下，但在我奶奶1957年左右因病住院期间，又紧急转回我爷爷自己名下。
3: It is said that my grandfather had put all that was had left (200,000 Dayang) to my grandmother's name after he set up the Trust for me in Hong Kong (500Million Dayang, $15 Million U.S.dollar). But he had to transferred all back to his own name when my grandmother was hospitalized in 1957.
4：据说我爷爷在1965年去世时，把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产（两万元人名币左右）全部给了丁姓助理，就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年，就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ￥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
5：我还想补充说一下，据我所听说的，如果我父亲不是我奶奶的头胎子，就算我奶奶很漂亮，我爷爷都一定会被张爱玲的父亲逼着离婚的。众所周知，张爱玲自传就提到当年19岁20岁的张爱玲为情自杀，她父亲是千里迢迢到上海找那富家子算账未果。我奶奶娘家可是没有一点家世背景的，而我爷爷家自古就有继承人的母亲是母后娘娘的传统，否则，世家子弟的张爱玲父亲是绝不会善罢甘休的。据说我爷爷当时是愿娶，但张爱玲绝不肯做小。
5: I want to add a bit more here: From the rumors I heard, if my father was not my grandmother's first born, my grandfather would be forced to have a divorce even if my grandmother was a rare beauty. From the famous Chinese writer's autography, Miss Zhang committed suicide when she was 19 or 20 years old, her father went to Shanghai to take care of the matter but got no results. My grandmother was not from a huge name nor a big house, but my grandfather's family has this tradition historically that the mother of the heir has a King Mother's privilege. Otherwise, Zhang's father, who was from a historic house as well, wouldn't swallow her daughter's miserable experience. It is rumored that my grandfather was willing to wed her but she was not willing without his divorce.
6：至于为什么私人助理家里及我父亲的弟妹们都认为我奶奶是会为了丁姓私人助理而放弃她自己所育所养亲生子女利益的，我还没听说这情有多深，但似乎这是目前上海普遍共识，也就是我爷爷的一切是我奶奶会愿意统统都给丁姓私人助理的。
6: Regarding why the private assistant's family or my father's siblings have assumed my granmother would choose the private assistant over her own borns, I have not heard their romance story yet to know how deeply they were involved. But it seems it is widely understood in Shanghai that my grandmother would willing to give everything that my grandfather had owned to the private assistant instead of her own borns,
7：我本人郑重声明我爷爷方智仁1948年替我在香港设立的信托从未被我奶奶向其他人提及，我爷爷方智仁也从未更改过该信托。我本人已经在2004年6月30日继承该信托。我爷爷奶奶的婚姻是他们自己的问题。----方敏
7: So, I make my announcement here: The Trust my grandfather Fang, Zhiren set up for me was never bleached by my grandmother, my grandfather never changed his settler's will as well. I inherited this Trust on June 30th of 2004. My grandparents' marriage is their own story.
---- 2018年9月18日。
If I see my mother alive on Boston's streets, what will be the scene? I guess she will be the crying one, I would be the hugging one. We have been like this since I was several years old. If that is my father, it would be we are both crying ones.
09-16-2018 如果自己家里有曾经在国外办理过信托之类的故事，应该如何查询。（How to inquire if you have a family story of entrusting)
09-15-2018 If my mother has been well (如果我妈妈一直都生活的挺好的）
About this morning's broadcasting of why a lot of Chinese are so angry with me. （有关今天早上所播出的为何华人很讨厌我）
1: Chinese dislike radio broadcasting of those fake romances, （1：华人不喜欢广播上的假恋爱故事）
My saying: I have complained to laws about possible sexual harassment.（我已经向法律投诉是否这是性骚扰。）
2: Chinese dislike I say I have achievements.（2： 华人不喜欢我说我有成就）
My saying: I have complained to the laws about if broadcasting those blackmails to denial my achievement is to take over my intellectual income. （我已经向法律投诉广播所播出一些内容是否是在造谣诽谤对我的成就加以否定以掠夺我的智慧产权收入。）
3: Chinese dislike I say I am wealthy. （3： 华人不喜欢我说我很有钱)
My saying: My Trust-inheriting is a real true statement. I have complained to the laws about all the negative impacts on my life that are caused by this money's lawful ownership confusion. (我的信托继承是真实的事实，我已经向法律投诉所有这些针对财产的法律所有权的困扰对我生活所造成的负面影响。）
----Sept 15th, 2018
09-14-2018 The Cousins （五福内的亲戚)
Among all my cousins from my grandfather, cousin Zhang is the eldest grandchild of my grandfather from my father's eldest younger sister. He has been who we have been looking up to since we were in elementary school and he is the most handsome one. He has been blessed with everything that is good from his both parents, which makes me so envious because I am the joined-dissatisfactions of my both parents. We grew up in different cities and I was a what-happened beauty to him when I started college in Shanghai, but we stayed aloof during my entire college years in Shanghai. 在我爷爷所有的孙子女中，我父亲的大妹妹所育的张家表兄是我爷爷最大的孙子。从小学起，他就是我们这些一等亲的小家伙们都应该学习的榜样，他也是我们当中长得最英俊的一个。他实在是太幸运了，他是他父母双亲所有优点的完美结合；我实在是太嫉妒了，我是我父母双亲所有自认缺点的综合体。我们从小就在不不同的城市长大，我到上海上大学的时候，我是他“哪有可能”的难以置信美女。整个大学五年期间，虽然都在上海，但我们之间完全没有任何联络。
Now, his blessed all-goodness has been such a wonderful joint with a real-beauty wife and a lovely child, while I am still struggling with the worldwide public doubts of "do you ever have a loving romance at all?" So, I will follow his advise of "don't say a lot", and I will "leave him alone" to his wonderful marriage. 这么多年之后，他的一切美好又添了一个很美好的“共同体”---- 一个确实很美丽的妻子和一个可爱的孩子， 而我，却是在面对着全世界对我"是否曾有任何男人爱过“的公众舆论质疑。所以，我会听从他”不要多言“的建议，我也会“别烦他”，让他可以安静的在他自己的美丽婚姻中流连。
Inside five cousins that traditionally called relatives, I am the only girl among my first cousins*, the only girl among my same family name second cousins, and possibly also the only girl among my same family name third cousins because I heard this morning's girl-cousins are my same family-name fourth cousins. 在传统的五等亲里面，我是一等亲里唯一的女孩，二等堂亲里唯一的女孩，从今天早上所播出的那几个女孩是四等堂亲这点来推测，我估计我也是三等堂亲里唯一的女孩，
They are obviously angry at our shared grandfathers because they don't feel being the spoiled girls as their loving parents have let them feel. Well, the youngest generation grandfather we share was the first-generation big donor of the Chinese college education in Republic of China time and died as a citizen of the Republic of China around the year of 1910, which was before their fathers were born if their fathers are much younger than 100 years old. So, I can imagine our shared grandfathers would just say this to them: "Hey, why are you so jealous? My child has been spoiling you ever since you were born, why you say he is not the representative of my love?" 今天早上这几个女孩很明显是极其的愤怒，对我们共同的爷爷们没像他们自己父母那样宠爱她们很是气愤。可是，我们最年轻的一代共同的爷爷，就是中国大学教育的第一代大捐款人的那个爷爷，是在1910年左右就去世了，如果这几个女孩的父亲还没到100岁的年纪，那1910年可是这几个女孩的父亲还没出生的年份。所以，我想象我们共同的爷爷们会对这几个女孩说：“嗨，你干嘛这么嫉妒啊？我们的孩子可是从你一出生就那么宠你爱你，你为什么说他不是在代我们表达对你的爱？”
But, how come I can be so lucky to be spoiled directly from my grandfathers? That is not only because I am their girl-grandchild but also because I am the rare species of a girl who carries their birthmark. I am the nicknamed their ”palms(birthmark) girl" who they had been expecting since the realization of "It has been all boys for so long already" which was about 2500 years long at the year when I was born. All these Trust-gifts to me are the recognition of "welcome a girl join this all-boys team". That is all. 可是，那我为什么这么幸运可以被我的爷爷们直接宠着？这不只是因为我是他们的孙女，更因为我是很罕见的一个长着他们共同的胎记的孙女。自从我爷爷们意识到“怎么这么多年来有胎记的都是男孩”之后，我爷爷们就是用“掌纹（胎记）孙女”来称谓我这个他们一直都在期待着的孙女，在我出生的那年，”这么多年来“指的是2500年来。所有我收到的这些信托礼物，都是在表达认可”欢迎加入这个全部男孩的团队“。就这些了。
*I had a girl first cousin died at several years old age.我曾有过一个一等亲的表妹，她在几岁时夭折了。
----Sept 14th, 2018
09-13-2018 什么是世态炎凉？
现在据说在华人社区传开了我当年托付对我父母的照顾时，除了安排他们有和我一样的医疗保险照顾之外，还给他们安排了一份零花钱。我母亲的零花钱应该是她所居住地区的初级中级会计师的退休工资，我父亲是所居住地区的国家科学院高级退休科学家的退休工资。我当时做这样的安排就是因为我母亲从八十年代失去工资退休金后最大的抱怨就是没有了她自己的一份独立收入，想买点什么都得和我父亲要钱，所以我做女儿的收到我父系爷爷的礼物后的就从那里面给了我爷爷们的好媳妇这么一份退休工资。我母亲结婚以后真是除了照顾我父亲，就是干家务养大我和我弟弟，完全就没有她自己，有好吃的就是我们爷仨的，有好穿的也是我们爷仨优先，她要是用自家的缝纫机给她自己做了一件衣服也是在我身上穿着。所以，我给她一份从照顾我的生活这个工作上退休的退休金，由我爷爷给我的礼物里出钱就是天经地义。我母亲要是还在，就已经收到了我的四个爷爷出钱由我给付的的退休金了。我父亲估计是绝对不会给我妈退休金啦，铁了心要让我妈照顾他一辈子啦。我也给了我父亲同样的一份退休金礼物，今后我花钱还是存钱，他就不用絮絮叨叨了，他退休了。这退休金的起始日期，我母亲是2004年7月1日起，我父亲是在他离开中国后（因为他在国内已有退休金了，不需要重叠）。这退休金礼物是一笔付清，支付给代办机构后每月独立给付，不是每月由我的会计师转账。
据说有些漫天遍地要找我父母信息的就是因为要么想要通过广播剧宣布的方式想让他们这些人自己领取我给我父母的这一份退休金，要么就是想找到他们必须让他们继续承担“抚养义务”。我希望我的父母还活的好好的，过的好好的，可以看的这个博文，保护好他们自己。
我的愤怒是，不管一些人相不相信这些从2004年就有的传言，都是我父亲以他自己中国科学院的高工资高退休金及福利待遇在满足我母亲作为他的妻子和他自己亲生孩子的母亲对生活的美好向往。我母亲虽然在八十年代失去了工作和退休金，但她从来不是在讨口饭吃。为何现在的国内外华人的舆论宣传就是我母亲我父亲不应该有一份他们自给自足的美好生活？为什么中国政府所做的舆论宣传就是我不应该也不会准许我自己照顾抚养我长大的我自己的亲生父母，而是应该把我的合法钱财归为公共厕所功能所有以作为厕所马桶的粪坑屎臭奖金？中国政府及海外华裔社区如此宣传的目的除了敲诈勒索，讹诈钱财，还有什么？我父母在“去世”之前都是中国公民，理应受中国国家法律保护，却是只有中国政府出面组织的一片谩骂质问“凭什么有钱？”
亲兄弟明算账，究竟是谁认为我合法钱财在法律的财产拥有权上有争议？为何就是不通过法律寻求答案？我本人就是在完全没有任何财产信息的请况下，完全是按照法律继承了我早已去世的爷爷们所信托给我的财产，按照同样的法律，我就没有任何可能继承到任何其他人的一分钱财。
如果任何人对我的法律信托继承有任何质疑，都是应该咨询法律，而不是漫街吆喝只要你们这些人自己没拿到钱，就是这世上根本就没有法律，甚至不准我拥有我自己的合法财产使用我自己的合法钱财，不准我作为美国公民享受由美国宪法所保障的言论自由说我自己有钱。你对我叫嚣吆喝，我就是向法律举报你敲诈勒索，讹诈钱财。我确实是就此已经全部向美国的警方投诉了。
09-11-2018 Who has been paying for my expenses?
04-18-2018 都是有关我的方家亲戚以及方家后人的
06-16-2018 就我的信托继承，我给方家后人和方家亲戚的一份说明
----2018年9月13日。
09-12-2018 89年学运这一群人和我之间的矛盾究竟是什么？
听说了今天早上的女军官故事。她是89年学运成员来了美国，嫁了一个美国人丈夫又有一些很名人的美国军方同事。
我和89年学运这群人的根本矛盾从来就不是什么政治上的对立，因为对当年学运的认知就是他们是一群爱国的学生，所以我和89年学运这群人的根本矛盾其实在于：
就这些啦。
----2018年9月12日。·
09-11-2018 Who has been paying for my expenses?
From all the angry voices, it is obvious that the anger is from the confusion regarding the money ownership, it is definitely not any romance confusion.
*Reason: All of them are not from the three big U.S. rich names. The anger is about my very expensive invisible high-tech security and very expensive remote medical expenses. Plus, my daily living expenses such as housing and food, have been covered by the U.S. government's welfare system's Section 8 housing project and Food Stamps (SNAP), obviously never any rich man's any money (updated on 09-12-2018)*.
Very simple way to ease the anger: Money's ownership by LAW.
So,
If there is anyone confused because of romance, please contact your own male or your attorney for your confusion. I will sue you or you both for sexual harassment if you insist on harassing me.
All my father-side grandparents died before I was born, and my parents were both well in 2004. So, it was not a family-inheriting but Trust-inheriting in 2004. 我父系的爷爷奶奶都是在我出生前就已经去世了，我父母2004年也活得很好， 所以我在2004年的继承不是分家产继承（家里刚刚死了人的继承，family inheriting）， 而是信托继承。
I only inherited Trusts that I was specified as the sole beneficiary person by the deceased Settler's letter. 我所继承的信托都是由已去世的信托设定人的信托委托书制定我是唯一受益人。
So, if there is any confusion regarding Trust-inheriting from my father-side associated, please consult your attorney. I will report extortion to the law enforcement if you insist on harassing me for "your share of the money" that I did not take and never have. 所以，亲兄弟明算账，如果我父系一方的相关人士，有任何关于我2004信托继承的疑问，请向你们自己的律师咨询，如果你坚持向我索要我从未拥有也从未拿过的所谓“你的那份钱”，我会向警方举报你敲诈勒索。
----Sept 11th, 2018
09-10-2018 Rumored broadcasting of "Never heard of this Min Fang" from the JPM Chase management
I heard there are a lot of people want to confront my saying about JPM Chase on the public channels.
I stand by the truthfulness and authentication of my account on the changing process that I published on my web blog.
09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
Some Clarifications:
1: The table "Force analysis table" illustrated my contributions.
The table is my MBA 503 Leading Organizational Change's homework "Force analysis table" in July of 2018, not any table of the technology projections from before mid of 2005-time from JPM Chase's management,
The table of this "Force analysis" illustrates my contributions of "What needs to change" was done before July of 2005, because the massive "how to change" already started at the online application level to serve the JPM Chase clients around July of 2005.
2: JPM Chase management.
JPM Chase (New York Headquartered) was having a merger with Bank One (Chicago Headquartered) since July of 2004. The CEO retired in Dec. of 2005. Mr. Chief Technology Officer retired in Dec. of 2006, but there was no successor after his retirement, each business line's CTO reports to the Chief Administrative officer.
Its Treasure Lowell technology center I worked at was rumored to be shut down and had a massive layoff since 2006.
I was a contractor and new to JPM Chase, and I only stayed there till January of 2007, so I did not pay attention to any other human resource changes. The change process in JPM Chase, by end of 2006, was already at the GUI (Graphic User interface) level to ensure looks-and-feels of the software( applications) also exactly as Business-requested.
3: How would I know if I was ever heard of?
The change conducted in JPM Chase was never a non-sense. I am proud of my lifetime achievement to promote Computer technology conversion from innovative invention only to crafted-arts creative technology. Nobody ever has done this before me for me to copy from.
Without my promotion of the QA importance, not a change that computer technology can change from "Never heard of the super cool thing invented to explore the unknown area", to "practical customer-order to serve the daily business-conducting usage". The difference in-between is as big as the "water-painting portrait" so pretty to have but not really useful, to a "crafted artistic design of home electronic appliances".
WIthout the deep understanding of how quality assurance safeguards pharmaceutical products in every step of its manufacturing, it was impossible a computer programmer could understand that upgrading the academic-expectation for Quality Assurance personnel was so critical in conducting this sweeping change in JPM Chase.
Not only I was a complete-project independent research programmer who did research on the client/server module (for authentication), the data transmission module and the database module independently for a never-done-before computer security project, but I was also a Quality Assurance personnel with the Inspector working experience from the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA equivalent in China. This was one of knowledge that I had contributed to JPM Chase management team.
Also, on July 1st of 2004, there was a brief conversation when I said I want to work in the financial industry to learn some economic & business, I was welcomed to take a look at its computer technology system since I was a top-notch computer security specialist, but I was not certain if I was welcome to JPM Chase. I was contracted to JPM Chase through a consulting firm from Florida.
----Sept 10, 2018
09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
09-09-2018 The Story of a Property in Shanghai
It is indeed very funny to hear the yell: "this is already a lawsuit if the husband insists on demanding that money back."
The story is started with a rumor: There is a property owned by me, which is actually owned by the American "Pejoves" Fund company in Shanghai, so, a lot of Shanghai's females who had some sexual intercourse experiences with He, Guoqiang （贺国强）deserved to take it over and actually occupied it to make the company-owned property such a Vagina-closet to serve those who are all obviously not active in-use but for private storage purpose.
My reaction: High pitched voice screaming "Why they occupy my property? Why my house is a Vagina storage? I need to burn this property".
The property's story: So, there went a Hispanic actress lady set the fire on a Shanghai property, I was very happy but she was not. She got a lawsuit in Shanghai because someone tried to pay her to buy that property she never owned, and this morning as you heard, her husband was demanded to pay for the damage to that property.
The confusion:
A note:
A lot of people, who include myself, have been concerned about what will be the relationship between me and my biological children if I can't be with them?
Well, I have asked laws help on possible intentional hate-education from those who want or have wanted their father, and I am possibly in the situation of being intentionally abducted a-like by those people as well, but if with all the help I have called, they have still being educated to hate me, I have to say I am a polygamist-male through and through and I am not willing to let myself be around by anyone who hates me. So, I decided it very simply as a biological mother: They are either my children who return my love caring as my own children, or they are never my anyone.
Min Fang
09-09-2018
09-08-2018 The M family and the Lehman Brother's French Investor
Heard about the M family has been associated with Lehman Brother's French Investor.
My response:
Ya, but I am just a typical beneficiary person of some Trusts who knows nothing. I claimed the Fund company is because I heard my 2018's expenses have been provided for by this American Fund company according to its French investor's instruction which was an after its company-tax payment, and possibly after its French investor's company-tax payment as well, so I say a Trust I inherited has been its upstream investor, but I don't know anything other than this.
----Sept 8th, 2018
09-07-2018 The Sweeping Chane of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
I was surprised when I heard the saying has been that nobody knows what I did in JPMChase. I never explained myself to anyone because I thought everyone already knows. The change already happened successfully and my role in this successful change was never denied by anyone from Lowell technology center of JPM Chase, and it is unimaginable that any organizational change can be made so successfully without the entire management knew what needed to change and how to change cascadingly, and change has been replicated throughout the entire U.S. banking industry. Of course, can you imagine any technology executives in the banking industry to have a good night sleep when I was screaming with anxiety "the internet banking-access is a green passage."
The day I stepped into JPM Chase Lowell technology center was July 1st of 2004, the massive firm-wide technology upgrading started only a year later in Mid of 2005, it had been every weekend that there was some major upgrade went online and at the backend offices, how could all these be achieved without the massive managerial efforts?
Following is updated from my school blackboard post of the MBA503 Leading organizational change:
Exactly, what had I contributed to this change as a computer QA contractor in JPM Chase?
I alerted the management my concern about banking technology and illustrated my vision of the banking industry in the digital era.
To lead the change, I addressed all these status quo-es I listed in the table to specify what content needed to be included in the standard business requirement for technology people to understand the business objectives for technology projects, and promoted the tech-spec standard should be a shared standard between QA and development as the one and only tech-standard, etc. I had been guided by the management to input my knowledge into JPM Chase's existing best practices, through a series of conflicts between QAs, business interpreters, and developers' group in projects which made me known for confrontational and stubborn.
How was I technically capable to lead this change?
My personal experience from the change: "QAs and programmers with years' practicing experiences in the technology department were all supportive of changes. They were the group understood what I was changing before the changes in the requirements were clear. It was a sweeping change everywhere in JPM Chase with their enormous support, great changing experience."
How did the change happen in JPM Chase?
The planned change proposed in mid of 2004 was to change the existing situation of " Business units take-in whatever technology support unit can give", to upgrade the technology to make the software or applications to be designed & developed exactly as requested by the business units.
09-06-2018 Being the Missy from generationally famous playboys' family in Shanghai（老上海赫赫有名的花花公子世家的当家大小姐）
I heard there has been saying, since the revelation of my grandfather's famous playful side, that I am paying my grandfathers' debt for him being the famous playboy in the 1930s-1948 Shanghai before he set up the Trust for me, my great-grandfather in 1910s-1930s Shanghai, my great-great-grandfather in Shanghai, etc. My father left Shanghai when he was 18 to join the Army and re-allocated to Nanjing where I was born.（我听说自从我爷爷是个有名的花花公子的真相披露以后，就听说1有这种“感觉这次是在让孙女还爷爷欠的风流债”的说法。我爷爷是从1930起直到1948年他替我设了信托之间一直都在玩花花，我曾祖父是1910-1930上海有名的花花公子，还有我曽曾祖父也是在上海玩花花。我父亲是1949年18岁离开上海当兵，然后被分配在南京也就是我出生的地方工作。）
Well, if assume each generation at age 50 to have the heir-son born, I should have over 50 rich-experienced playboy grandfathers-angels looking after me in heaven, considering my family has been over 2500 years rich polygamist family even though I don't know how may exceptionals like my father who knows nothing about playing.（我还算幸运啦，想想我们家可是有着2500年历史的一夫多妻的富裕家庭，如果算50岁才生下下一代继承人，我就有至少超过50代的玩花花经验及其丰富的爷爷们在天上当神仙看护着我。不过我不知道我爷爷里有多少代是像我父亲一样对玩花花一窍不通的。）
Why I say this? I am interested in who is demanding the price from me? This demanding is obviously from Shanghai, not the Zhejiang province where my family had resided before moved Shanghai.（我为什么这么说，我很想知道是谁在向我开这个价码？这个开价的努力很明显是和上海有关，而不是我家搬去上海之前的浙江省。）
----Sept 6th, 2018
09-05-2018 亲兄弟明算账，是否法律权益是否合法拥有应该是寻求法律所给予的答案及解释
听说了有些人对继承究竟是怎么回事，还是很愤怒很弄不明白。我本人的亲身体会，原因在于司法部门的法务工作人员可能高估了我们这些不是学法律的人对于他们就法律事务的专业解释的理解能力。
从2015年起，我是整天怒气冲天到处找我的钱在哪，海外华裔社区就到处传言说我根本是想要讹诈美国政府机关，要不是我当年确实有继承经历，还真有可能造成美国政府机关对我采取行动。其中关键就在于我不是学法律的，我的继承故事从未更改，就是关键线索统统没有。法律界不知情的人士听不懂我的故事，被我烦到不行，我听来听去法律界人士的回复都是敌意重重。·好在两者之间的法律调查人员只听线索是什么，那我可是提供了一堆也从没变过，而他们的专长就是他们自己找关键线索及法律依据，所以我熬过来了。
比如说吧，我就一直说我是在帮我申请绿卡的律师那里开的电话会议，司法界的人士一听就已经把耳朵给关了。我给换成：我是由这个律师通知，在这几天去了这家律师楼，地址电话是什么，并在这个律师的全程陪同下参与了这几个继承相关会议。。。，法律界的人士就开始问。。。
再比如，我一直说我是在6月30日继承了信托，7月1日又办理了信托，法律界人士就问信托的名称及登记记录是什么，还态度明确就是没这个信息就什么查询都不现实也不可能，我一听这根本就是在问我的银行存款账户信息，我就赶紧解释我很相信我的信托律师，我就只想知道生活费用给付在哪，法律界人士的耳朵就又给关上了。因为我既然说我有办理了信托，他们其实是在问这一份新的信托，也就是我继承以后自己办理的这一份信托的登记记录是什么，虽然我也还是相信我的信托律师，但我已经知道如何恰当表达我只是查询生活费用给付情形的目的而不是想要假借查询实施讹诈。
我听说上海有些人去了法院要告我，法院就给个单子就不再予以理睬，说是给气到不行。我就一直在美国说整个事件就感觉中国好像根本就没有法律。现在回头看，我本人认为可能是他们看不懂那个单子是什么意思。法院从来不是什么“有理没钱莫进门”，但也不是只要乐意就可以告东告西的，举个例子，就像一个东北的单纯务农人员，在没有从上海购买任何家电产品的情况下，就没有任何法律依据可以上法院控告上海某家用电器商店的商业运作是否规范，这个东北的单纯务农人员是可以因为自己是中国公民而走进中国的法院，但中国法院不会受理而是会给一个单子说明拒绝承办其投诉的理由，这其实是根据中国的法律予以拒绝的。
就我的继承而言，是依据中国法律，英国法律及美国法律，上海的方家亲戚没有可能上法庭告我。这就是因为根据法律，按照我爷爷方智仁的遗嘱，他们不是我所继承的香港这个信托的受益人，所以在既不是由他们的钱设立的信托，他们也不是信托设立人方智仁所指定的信托受益人的情况下，他们就没有任何法律资格上中国法庭英国法庭美国法庭就我的信托继承而控告我。我爷爷方智仁的信托委托书是给我的私人信件，我有法律权力不予公开，但这并不会妨碍中国司法部门就上海的方家亲戚是否也是该信托受益人的法律调查，我在此博客也已经提供了充足的调查线索。我听说方家亲戚也已经听到中国司法机关调查后的解释，可能就是听不懂，所以很愤怒。
至于这个香港的信托其实是于家的什么人的说法是谬传。我听说的是上海有个于家也在香港办理过信托，但设立人，设立金额，目前的信托规模，及信托受益人等等，都和我爷爷方智仁替我所设立的信托完全不同，根本不是一个信托，2004年的五亿美金是由我所继承的由方智仁1948年所设立的那个信托给付，这个2004年五亿美金也远远超越了传言中的于家在香港所设立的信托在2004年及目前（2018年）的全部资金规模。
以上这些是有关方家亲眷是否也是信托受益人的。还有一些华裔社区的疑问就是究竟这家那家公司是谁拥有？这也是应该寻求法律答案和解释的，但这和方家亲眷一点关系都没有。方家亲眷和我继承之间需要法律解释的是究竟他们自己是否是受益人，属于信托法和继承法所涵盖内容。
至于这家那家美国公司在法律上究竟是归谁拥有，也就是说这家那家美国公司是否是我的另一个信托作为法人机构在美国所投资的企业公司，这是由英国法国美国的公司法投资法所涵盖的内容，全部应该是由这些公司的法务部们和该信托法人机构的法务部门所处理，这和谁应该是该信托的受益人完全无关。这是为什么我在弄清我所继承的是该信托而不是该信托在美国所投资的这家那家公司后我就对这家那家公司的法律所有权困扰完全不再发声的原因，这一切都是该信托作为法人机构的公司投资业务经营，我是该信托的唯一受益人。
在方家亲眷根本就不是该信托的受益人也不是该信托的设立人的情况下，方家亲眷（包括中国政府）都和这些美国公司的法律所有权完全没有任何关系。
----2018年9月5日。
09-04-2018 What to respect when the public channel's continuing promotion is "A sarbage woman is not good to be a proud public toilet"?
Happy celebration of the clarification that I never took over anyone's wealth by flirting remotely.
I heard my claim of the following four American Fund companies have survived weekends. Other than the four well-known confused families you have heard of, other than their lawfully registered owner-investor company, no one else can claim their ownership but I am privileged to claim the four Trusts I inherited in the year of 2004 have been these companies upstream-investors.
This has been my frustration facing the anger of "you can't own anyone's wealth by saying so" and the panic of "Whose money you spend? Where did you get the money?" Exactly right, how could any well-managed wealth possibly have no-known lawful owner? How could I possibly spend whoever's money without contacting anybody to get the money physically into my hands or my wallet?
It has been so ridiculous to say that I could spend whoever's $4-6 Billion U.S. dollars on July 1st of 2004 by just saying "I want so" in a small law firm in Stamford of Connecticut. The truthful facts actually have been:
To avoid confusion if what I have claimed is inherited money or flirting-taking-over-fees, this is to clarify all four American Fund companies, each has $200Billion-size in 2004, which I have claimed on my web blog that,
I don't know what the confusions are but I am not bad shaped for this morning's broadcasting of the continuing education which is themed of "the garbage woman has no value as public bathroom toilet seat", what I have learned of so far is that some people seem just don't know what else can possibly be the reason to look up to whom else when these people are not in-use body-positioned. What else these Amercan real riches and the almighty Chinese government are trying to educate the united nation on a public channel?
I myself have been brought up totally different value so I don't promote this "woman is a toilet" even I myself is an American rich as well who is also a traditional polygamist but a female having a male's privilege expected in my marriage. I don't know if this "proud to be the toilet valuable" educational theme is my wrongful impression but I expect myself won't be so shabby in the town of traditional college education of traditional concept of culture.
My current headache is not the ambition to occupy a high-level executive position, but how to fund my next English literature education if I am ready for it before I receive my allowance.
----Sept 4th, 2018
08-31-2018 Anger of "You can't state you own this money if you don't own the paying company."(updated)
----August 31st, 2018
08-30-2018 I refuse to adopt any child who does not carry my blood biologically.
I refuse to adopt any child who does not carry my blood biologically. I have no problem to have nothing to do with this morning's each announced child's entire father-side relatives at all.
I heard both mothered by a Chinese or an Asian, both born in 2010 but not in June of 2010. I heard this entire "plot" is called "the smartest strategy" to take over my own handsome wealth.
It is so disgusting when the entire broadcasting of this morning, as if, is to present how the possible British Nobility or an American Rich both have nothing for each's own biological daughter to call her inheritable.
----August 30th, 2018
Reference about my own handsome wealth:
I never stated I heard I inherited money. I have been stating I experienced inheriting by going to a law firm to participate teleconferences with identifications and an attorney's accompanying. My statement has been that I participated in the teleconferences at my green card application attorney's office on these three days (which can be verified by the satellite records).
On July 1st of 2004, I entrusted what I have inherited on June 30th of 2004.
----August 28th, 2018
My inheriting day big $4Billion - $6Billion shopping spray of "what I want" was on July 1st of 2004. *I had a huge panic attack in 2017 on 96.9 FM Boston, when I heard for the first time that Rockefellers accused me spent their $4-6 Billion money on July 1st of 2004 because I never contacted anyone of them to ask their money or their permission to spend their money all my life.
----August 30th, 2018
08-28-2018 Exactly, what are the confusions related to my inheriting on June 30th of 2004?
1: The confusion of how can I expect to own any wealth by announcing so on a public channel or by bilking government? My Answer: This is totally a misunderstanding.
A lot of public anger associated with how I could possibly fancy I could own O'Connors family-wealth by announcing so on the radio? This is totally a misunderstanding. Let me illustrate it a bit.
There is a property or a company which has been lawfully owned, and there is a manager who has been looking after this property or this company. O'Connors' confusion was that they have been the boss of this manager over almost two centuries, of course, it is because they own this property or this company. My confusion was "but this is the same property or the same company I was told I inherited from my birth Chinese grandfather on my inheriting day".
It turned out that the company has been owned by its British Investor company which has been on its ownership registration-license record since it was established over 400 years ago. The Trust I inherited has been its British investor company's upstream investor.
----August 28th, 2018
2: The confusion that I can't say I have inherited money by stating "I heard of".
My Answer: This is a misunderstanding.
I never stated I heard I inherited money. I have been stating I experienced inheriting by going to a law firm to participate teleconferences with identifications and an attorney's accompanying. My statement has been that I participated in the teleconferences at my green card application attorney's office on these three days (which can be verified by the satellite records). I need to reference what I possibly inherited, which are the companies I have stated provided for me since 2015, is because I was inquiring where the paid-out money could possibly be. I stated I heard what I had possibly inherited but not inheriting itself.
----August 28th, 2018
3: The confusion of who knows who was inheriting on June 30th of 2004 when it was so crowded. My answer: This is a misunderstanding.
Inheriting only relates to what a deceased person's left behind which means the wealth should be lawfully owned by the deceased before the death, lawfully owned after the inheriting, and also cared for during the in-between time by the will-executing attorneys according to the Laws. My Trust-inheriting is much easier because there is no confusion of the legitimate-ownership in-between period.
So, it doesn't matter how many unintended people were presented in a place when someone is inheriting, the deceased person's wealth should be under will-executing attorneys responsibilities to ensure lawful distribution which leads to who lawfully owns what after the inheriting. Will-executing attorneys are the group oversee the wealth-ownership-transition from the deceased to the living according to the Laws during an inheriting, it is impossible to confuse who can inherit what no matter how crowded the inheriting place might be nor how many inheriting happening at the same geographic location at the same time.
All inheriting must associate with a death, a Family-inheriting is always sad because it associates with an inheriting-day-recent death.
Trusting-inheriting is always independent of the time of the deceased settlor's death. All my grandfathers passed away before I was born, so, my inheriting was a happy event.
On July 1st of 2004, I entrusted what I have inherited on June 30th of 2004.
----August 28th, 2018
My inheriting day big $4Billion - $6Billion shopping spray of "what I want" was on July 1st of 2004. *I had a huge panic in 2017 on 96.9 FM Boston when I heard Rockefellers accused me spent their $4-6 Billion money on July 1st of 2004 because I never contacted anyone of them to ask their money or their permission to spend their money all my life.
----updated on August 30th, 2018
My anger of who is the person confused the sucking-fee with the inherited money?
My anger has been
1: When I was claiming I inherited since June 30th of 2004, it is obviously stating I have money but definitely not a living person's romance-fee, and even if there was someone else inheriting on that same day, the wealth should be under will-executing attorneys managing for lawful ownership transitioning purpose, how could anyone confuse my claim of inherited money with some living persons' family-wealth while knowing their entire family have been healthy living all this time?
2: With the will-executing attorneys overseeing the ownership-transition according to the Laws, how could possibly any lawful ownership be transferred to me if that was not my inheriting or not my inheritable? All those Trusts I have inherited have never been owned by anyone else other than myself since their establishments. What else is the confusion about the ownership of what I have inherited, other than the confusion similar to the confusion item 1?
3: I have been stating I inherited my birth Chinese grandfathers' money and all these companies I referenced have never been owned by those confused males, why all those who got joysticks-sucking-fees deserve to shit me all over? Who is the person doesn't know the difference between the inherited-money and the joystick-sucking-fee?
Why wouldn't I fight back by telling everybody that must be a public men's-toilet if the confidence is " being the most eligible one for the joyStick-sucking-fee as long as there is a joystick."
08-25-2010 My inheriting is never a joke
Heard about the talk of "scheduled to start at 10:30 AM EST on June 30th on 2004"?
My response:
I was called to have a meeting with my green card application attorney in his law firm located on Broad Street in Stamford, CT on June 30th of 2004 at about 9:30AM-10AM. It took me a bit time to take off because I did not remember this appointment at all. That was the meeting started off with "You are not allowed to contact a married U.S. Military officer until his retirement time." I did not remember how long it was but I did remember there was some friendly chat after this "opening note" before I was asked: "Do you wish (want) to be a rich person?" So, I was asked this question definitely after 10:30-11: 00 AM EST on June 30th, 2004.
I took this "Do you want to be a rich person?" as a social conversation, so I answered, "of course". I heard I was asked by a Federal Judge from New York State.
Sometime later, I was asked if I was willing to pay willingness-based voluntary inheriting related taxes which are a federal estate tax and state inheriting tax, I heard recently this was asked by an IRS tax officer and a Connecticut tax officer. I took this so not seriously and answered: "If I don't need to pay a tax, why would I ever pay any tax". I was asked again but I was still not getting the seriousness of taxing, so I said the capital and highlighted "NO" which I knew made the air still at the moment, I changed my mind about paying to inherit related taxes already and I expressed this to my entrusting attorneys already.
----August 25th, 2018
I heard there was a lot of confusion why a Federal Judge presented? and from New York State when I was a Connecticut State resident?
My response:
First of all, a Federal Judge was presented may be because some Trusts I inherited are from my ancient grandfathers which are so ancient that the Trusts were set up by their wills but after their deaths when a Trust became a lawful item. These Trusts are testamentary trusts which need a probation Judge for inheriting. What I have announced on this blog are all from very ancient birth grandfathers of mine.
Second, Connecticut state, New York state and New Jersey State are a common tripod-states that attorneys often hold multi-states licenses in this area, but I don't know about Federal Judges.
----August 25th, 2018
08-19-2018 The confusion about who owns what money or who can spend what money.
Heard about the confusion of "donation" and "dividend".
My response:
On July 1st of 2004, I said donation plan of "200Million" each to Olympic Game related, the confusion has been why it became the invested company's donation instead of the investor's personal donation.
Any company's donation is the expenses before the company-tax which means any company's donation is:
The difference between a company's donation and an investor's private use of money lies on where this money paid from. If there is a spending paid by a company's check, it could be the company's donation if the expense is before the company-tax payment, and it would be definitely the investor's private expense if the spending with the investor's instruction is after the company's tax payment.
听说了今天早上的广播让很多人感觉到一丝悲一丝凉，我就觉得还好啦。你想啊，那几个说这些话的人，如果他们自己要是有个三长两短的，虽说是他们有小孩会在乎他们，那他们的小孩子除了替他们报警之外，还能为他们做什么特别的吗？我的孩子还小还是我的责任义务要保护他们，所以我就自己替自己报警啦。
听说了有一堆以前和我在一个学校上过学的，一个单位上过班的，都纷纷上广播表态他们是打心眼里认为他们自己才是最优秀的，认为我方敏就是不知道自己姓什么而已，我方敏对他们这些人的态度也是一样：”你自己又算老几？你自己也不过就是个什么都不是的狗屎而已，政府雇员也就是个中国的公务员而已，吓死谁啦？我方敏什么情况都从未需要过你的任何狗屁，狗叼和狗髀，也永远没有需要认识你。”
----August 20th, 2018
Heard currently there is a lot of confusion about who owns what money or who can spend what money.
My response:
Money's ownership is by law.
The lawful owner of the money is the only authority to spend the money or deny the wrongful use of the money.
It is never whoever's privilege to deny the money's lawful owner's lawful right on how to spend the money.
If anyone wants to open a coffee shop, this person would be advised to apply for a commercial license (registration title or license title), a Tax license (tax id), and a food administrative license. Among this three, only food administrative license is specialized to a coffee shop or a restaurant, the commercial license and tax license are needed by all organizations.
It is by its commercial license and tax license, the paying company is 100% fully owned by its upper investor company such as a British company, and this British company is 100% fully owned by its upper investor company such as a French company.
It is by the paying American company's commercial license (registration title or license title), and by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying American company has never been directly owned by any individual in the U.S, nor in U.K.
It is by the paying American company's commercial license (registration title or license title), by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying company has never been owned by any Rockefeller Houses, nor any Ford Houses, nor any Walton houses.
I have been provided for by several American companies' paying checks, these paying checks have been confronted by individual Americans if these paying checks can be the lawful spending of the paying American companies.
The evidence if all these paying checks are lawful are the facts that all these paying-checks were instructed by these paying American companies' lawfully registered lawful owners.
All these paying checks lawfulness should not be the subject for any individual American to deny.
08-16-2018 THE DTA money-taken story was in 2007
Heard this morning's broadcasting that the same glamor European Spanish took money from DTA.
My response:
I heard it yesterday.
If anyone wants to open a coffee shop, this person would be advised to apply for a commercial license (registration title or license title), a Tax license (tax id), and a food administrative license. Among this three, only food administrative license is specialized to a coffee shop or a restaurant, the commercial license and tax license are needed by all organizations.
It is by its commercial license and tax license, the paying company is 100% fully owned by its British investor company, and the British company is 100% fully owned by its French investor company.
It is by the paying company's commercial license (registration title or license title), by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying company has never been owned by any individual in the U.S, nor in U.K.
It is by the paying company's commercial license (registration title or license title), by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying company has never been owned by any Rockefeller House, nor any Ford Houses, nor any Walton houses.
I have been angry that when the husband's family never owns the paying company, and when the glamor wife took the money paid by the paying company's company-check, but the husband keeps telling everyone he is such a family man. What this suppose to mean when my providing money from the company-check been taken by the couple who I never had any romance association with?
Let me illustrate what I mean. There is a restaurant and its lawful owner is a couple by the restaurant's license registration & tax id. The owner-wife paid to a hospital her maiden parents' medical care by a restaurant's check. Well, there is a glamor wife went to the hospital and tells the hospital she is a wife and she dislikes her husband's family's money to pay for the owner-wife's maiden parents, so she took the money from the hospital. And the glamor husband went on telling everybody he is such a family man.
But the glamor couple is not the co-owners of the restaurant, the glamor husband's family does not have the restaurant's ownership either. And the glamor husband is never the lover of the owner-wife. The two couples know each other but never co-own the restaurant nor romantically ever associated.
I am the maiden parents equivalent as the restaurant's upstream investor. The BTD and DTA are the hospital equivalent. The seriousness is the money was paid in 2004 but taken from BTD and DTA in 2007.
----August 16th, 2018
08-15-2018 My current lodging situation (我现在的居屋）
I remembered my current residence was reserved on July 1st of 2004, and I am 80% certain the unit I am currently living in is the unit reserved because it fits the discussion that I had participated. I heard the rent was paid on the same day of July 1st of 2004 to HUD and locked in BHA by HUD. I moved-in in February of 2013.（我记得我现在所住的房子是2004年7月1日就预定的，我有八成的把握我现在住的这个套房就是所预定的那套，因为周围环境符合我当时所参与的讨论。我听说这房租在2004年7月1日那天就已经付掉了，并由HUD锁定在其BHA的账户里。我是2013年2月搬入。）
I heard the glamor European Spanish who took the money from BHA in 2007 is the wife of the featured person in the Virginia-Washington Regional Hyatt's bar story in 2003, who was also the 30-years old featured person in the Tokyo Airport's romance story in 1980.（我听说从BHA把钱给拿走的那个漂亮的欧洲西班牙人是做老婆的，丈夫就是2003年维吉尼亚州--华盛顿州交界处的凯悦酒店酒吧故事的那个男主角，和八十年代的东京机场罗曼故事的那个30多岁的男主角是同一个人。）
I heard the female featured in the Tokyo airport romance story currently works for the Chinese Foreign department is possibly the reason the Chinese government is so angry regarding the benefits I received as if all these benefits have ever been from the Chinese government.（我听说东京机场罗曼故事的那个女主角目前是中国政府外交部的工作人员，有可能是中国政府对我享受美国政府福利愤怒至极的原因，我感觉这愤怒的程度就好像我拿到的每一分钱的美国政府福利都是由中国政府在付钱似的。）
I heard that in Boston city, the driving force to evict me from all these government agency's help is the Boston Chinese community, it is rumored all these "I don't give shits to" is organized by the C-Mart supermarkets' owners who are affiliated with the $10,000 per month since 1967 story.（我听说，在波士顿本地闹得天翻地覆，就是要把我从美国政府的福利系统赶出去的组织者就是波士顿的中国城超市的股东们，就是他们是和那个自1967年起每月一万美金寄中国的故事有密切关系的。）
I heard the $10,000 per month story shares the same Spanish investor company with the glamor European Spanish's husband's family story（我听说每月一万元的故事和那个漂亮的欧洲西班牙人的丈夫家里的故事是由同一家西班牙投资公司所投资的。）.
I don't know if my food and cash expenses had been paid on July 1st of 2004 as well, and I don't know if all these what I heard could be real, so I have contacted the Authority agencies about my current situation and the pressure I am facing. Yeah, exactly, have I been someone who intends to live on other people's money that deserved to be evicted, or I am just someone who got stuck in a legal situation that needs government agencies' reaching-out help?（我不知道我的食品现金给付是否也在2004年7月1日那天就已经支付，我也不知道我所听到的这些是否都是真实，所以我已经联络相应的美国政府机关提及我现在的情况以及我所面临的压力。是啊，我究竟是一个想赖着花别人的钱，就是应该被从福利机构给赶走的人？还是一个莫名其妙被困在法律事物当中需要美国政府援助的一个人？）
----August 15th, 2018
08-14-2018 I never bilked into my success in 2004.
Heard this still has been an issue regarding how I could be the major featured person of the radio program.
My response:
I heard how I was invited into the meeting has been the serious issue for the reasons that I don't deserve the major featured person fee because I "bilked" this opportunity to make $3.5 Billion + more from a radio program without a bit of appreciation showed towards the group I "bilked".
I thought this has been cleared but I realized it probably has not because yesterday I received a letter obviously don't take me as the person in need of financial help because of some legal situation but have the credential to pay off any debt easily with this $3.5Billion income. I still don't know what has been the confusion because my side story has been a very simple inheriting case that expanded to chatroom talks which sparked the creation of this radio program.
I worked for Janus Associated since September of 1999 and I had finished the Window login replacement project sometime before August of 2003. This is the project I expected to pay me off handsomely because of its no-password login module and secure encrypted data-transmitting module. I requested to move up to Boston of Massachusetts for the reason I could work with the Boston team on this project if they had any issues with the prototype I handed in.
It was after this relocation to Boston of Massachusetts, I attended a seminar n the Biometric industry with Janus Associates colleagues in Washington area where I met David Petraeus in a Hyatt hotel's lobby area which was in September or October of 2003. I relocated back to Stamford of Connecticut in November of 2003.
I was called into a conference meeting in January of 2004 by my green card application representing attorney. I heard earlier that this was organized by a lady attorney who I had received a phone call from in the year 2000 which was about if I need immigration sponsorship. I heard recently the attorney stated that he was asked by an investor to David Petraeus' family business to schedule this meeting. This investor of David Petraeus' family business has been a French company's American investment. This is the same company I claimed has [aid for my this year's living expenses currently.
This French company's American investment has been an investor to Lehman Brothers was the reason that my outrageous "ideas" about "a Lehman brothers investor" on July 1st of 2004 was not a criminal activity after Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008. I have explained on this blog publicly to Lehman Brothers management as well as its staff after I heard I myself have been its investor that it was never because I had any issue against its management nor its board of directors, nor I insisted on to make troubles. It is true that CDC or subprime mortgages related issues had been the real reason. Now I am apologizing to all the impacts because of confusions related to this.
I was called by this same attorney to his office on June 30th of 2004. The meeting started off with forbidding to contact David Petraeus" because he was a married U.S. military officer then. I was told it was the official order from the U.S. Military.
I was called by this same attorney to his office on the next day which was July 1st of 2004. This meeting was based on my request of entrusting my inherited wealth. I inherited on the same day on June 30th of 2004, but it was sometime after that U.S. Military's order I mentioned above.
This radio program was created on July 1st of 2004, in the same meeting I entrusted my inherited wealth.
I was never invited into any of all these 2004's telemeetings by David Petraeus or his Rockefeller relatives. I never bilked myself as a Rockefeller associated to be in any of 2004's teleconferences. I was invited by my own name Min Fang because of my own matters. The only reason that associated with David Petraeus and how I was invited into all 2004's meetings was the U.S. Military order which forbade me to contact David Petraeus before his retirement from the U.S. Military.
----August 14th, 2018
08-13-2018 Any thought or research can be expressed in a couple of lines if thoughtfully refined,
听说了今天早上提到的“为什么一个中国公民身份的演员在广播上对美国的智慧产权疑问做权威发言？”
我的回应：
我也是和这一拨人有很大的矛盾。据说他们就是1967年开始非法扣留了我每月的一万美金生活费的于家。据说是北京人民艺术剧院的老演员于是之，或者艺术界的于曙光的一，二等亲之类的。所以全是一些中国的演员在吵啊闹啊，他们就是什么都够资格。什么都是这一群中国公民（演员）在广播剧上指手画脚，对所有一切事物当权威。
谁给他们的广播公司话筒？据说是：中国政府的外交部，阿尔伯特·高尔及其曾任中国外交部工作人员的于姓女友，以及那六个"自己乐意就算是美国的广播公司董事会”的美国人。广播公司的地址就在纽约洛克菲勒中心的其中一栋楼里。
----2018年8月13日。
Heard this morning's Viagra argument.
My response:
I heard the first one of my intellectual income checks from the Viagra patent was taken by a couple of court police officers after that morning's "I rule" broadcasting. I heard no 911 call was made because another phone number was given as a 911 substitute which was understood as a precinct's direct line, I heard this was the reason why no 911 police officer responded the call.
I was asked what would happen if a 911 call was made? I heard the 911 police officials would ask the court police officials to present the court ruling in-prints. A U.S. judicial court ruling in-prints have the ruling district court and this Viagra check's legal case references for the 911 police officers to verify the lawful validation of the court police officers' check-collecting.
As I said some time ago, the Viagra's company acknowledged my contribution to the Viagra, and I never complained about the reward size and I am very happy with the reward size I have been granted by the Viagra company. So, there has been no such legal case in any district court ever that's regarding the reward of my intellectual contribution to the Viagra. So, if a 911 call was made on the day when the first check was issued, this confusion, if radio program's performing "Judge ruling" broadcasting could possibly be a valid Judge's ruling, would have been clarified already.
I was asked if the reward of my contribution was fairly evaluated because it was only "one line speech". This confusion is definitely ridiculous enough. Any thought or research can be concluded and expressed in a couple of lines of speech or a couple of pages of papers if thoughtfully refined to put into a speech or on papers. A politician's campaign speech possibly have one theme to be expressed clearly in just one word such as "change" in 2008, but it definitely never worth only 6-alphabets as its value.
I was asked how about those who had worked in the lab research or clinical research but did not receive any recognition in the reward format of patent-income reward. Well, all Viagra-research participants have received recognization of their contribution in the reward format of their researchers' salaries, all their hard-working research hours, their efforts and their successes, together with their salary-recognitions they already have received would all have been part of the evaluation for the recognition in the format of the patent-income, theoretically. But I was never part of the Viagra's lab or clinic research efforts, so I don't know anything more than what I had joked about which was I had contributed an increased-portion of reward size to the clinical research team as a team member.
As I joked almost a year ago, if my contribution was evaluated individually, the financial number will be much greater than any researchers who have worked for years because Viagra was just on-market when the contribution-evaluation was conducted. I have helped the company to save a lot of money on research and to make the sales early than expected which would definitely put into an advantageous position in the evaluation. The Viagra's company's research team rejected me to be their evaluation-team member was the reason the Viagra's company decided to put me into the team-evaluation with the Viagra's clinical research team. That was what I joked about. I have been very happy I had caught the opportunity to contribute to the Viagra. My contribution was made on a June's Sunday in 2004 which was received by the Viagra's company on the same day.
----August 13th, 2018
About the confusion of the board of directors room.
My response:
First of all, only a stock-company has a board of directors. Board of directors' room is a room-space which is dedicated to hosting the board of directors' meetings. Board of directors is a group of investors' representatives which should not be grouped on the voluntary basis because the room-space is limited to host a certain amount of people only while a public trading company may have over 5 digits of public investors.
It needs the qualified investor's lawful valid authorization to eligible a person to be a member of the board of directors.
----August 13th, 2018
08-11-2018 I refuse to provide for whoever's ex-marriage partner（我拒绝向别人的前妻前夫支付离婚生活费）
Heard this morning's talk sparked confusion about my advice on July 1st of 2004.（听说今天早上的播出内容触发了对我2004年7月1日所建议内容的一些困扰。）
My response:（我的回应：）
On July 1st of 2004, I was making the financial arrangement about my possible biological children from pregnant mothers. I was asked by someone who was having a headache if considering some more children from his current marriage a good idea when he already has some adult children. I was asked what my advice would be as a female polygamist having a male's privilege.
（2004年7月1日那天，我是安排我自己可能会由代理孕母生出的亲生小孩的财务相关事宜。有人说他现在为了是不是在有了成年子女后应该再有几个小孩很头疼。这人就问我这样一个一妻多夫者是如何看待这个问题的，会如何建议？）
I spoke out of my understanding from a polygamist marriage as a traditional polygamist: "A marriage partner is for life and there should be no legal reason for a divorce". I also understand that biological children from any non-polygamist marriage are all life-long relationships as well, but the marriage partner is purely from the willingness. *An unfaithful marriage female partner in a traditional multi-wives polygamist marriage would face a denounce never a divorce.
(我作为传统观念的一妻多夫者，我对传统一夫多妻婚姻的理解是：“婚姻是终身的，没有什么离婚的”。我也理解对一个一夫一妻的婚姻来说，婚姻所出的亲生孩子们统统是终身的血脉相连，而婚姻伴侣则是谁则是完全个人的自由意愿。*传统的一夫多妻婚姻中出轨的女方只会面对废除从来不是什么离婚。）
Based on my own understanding of the non-polygamist marriage, I said if the future family inheriting is the only concern about more children, why not make the financial arrangement for the younger children at the time when each would be born?
(处于我自己对于一夫一妻婚姻的理解，我对那人说如果担心家里如何分家产是造成头疼是否该多要几个孩子的原因，那为什么不在每一个新的孩子将出生的时候就为这个孩子做好财务安排？）
There was someone else asked at this time that he was having the headache of a possible financial settlement for a divorce but he did not do the financial arrangement when his not-same-mother children were born, I said he could just separate children's settlement with the mother's if he would be in the situation to consider such financial arrangement, he would feel much comfortable this way to take very good care of his children who are his blood no matter what his marriage situation would be.
（
I was not taught but this separating the mother's financial arrangement with the child(ren) has been my family's tradition. My family has been a long history polygamist family that till my grandfather's generation had first-ever one mother's children's family inheriting in 1907 or so. My great-grandmother was the first ever dowager of my family who got a very good financial arrangement from my great-grandfather that was the best ever.
In my family, the tradition has been the wives got lifetime financial arrangements from the dying husband but family inheriting belongs to his children only. The wives could have lifetime financial arrangements was because there was no such imagination before 1907 that a wife would be expected to re-marry. And I can totally imagine that possibly there is no divorcee would love to see the divorced partner to move on to a new romance happily by the divorce settlement.
I heard there are a lot of in-marriage partners have been participating in this fight of having a better financial settlement. I don't know if those who talked them into participating in this fight are actually cursing their own marriages because a divorce settlement only exists for a divorced marriage. Their own wealthy marriage partners won't understand their participation in any other way.
I myself is wondering who need to fight this "better divorce settlement" against me or my money? I have been living alone all this time to eligible nobody. Is this fight actually to ask me to pay for whoever's ex-marriage partners? Is it the similar scheme as the intellectual income should be re-assigned to some sexual partners?
I refuse to provide for whoever's ex-marriage partner.
----August 11th, 2018
08-09-2018 Why this radio program is all about the Public Armed Robbery or the Public Armed Abducting?（为什么这个广播剧的制作宗旨好像不是抢劫就是绑架？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting about inheriting related tax（听说了今天早上所播出的继承税）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I am very happy I am the person eligible to donate Estate tax to the Federal and inheriting tax to Connecticut. According to the United States tax laws, it is absolutely my freedom to decide how much I feel comfortable to donate or when to donate. Currently, I feel comfortable to donate according to my intellectual tax contribution. The taxes would not be paid by my living expenses budgeted nor those paid-outs of my living expenses.
(我很开心我是够资格捐联邦继承税及捐康州继承税的一个人。按照美国的税法，什么时候捐税及捐多少税就是完全按照我自己的意愿了。目前我是愿意参照我应缴纳的智慧产权税来捐遗产税。这些税收既不会从我的生活费用预算里支付，也不会从那些已经支付给我的（但还未收到的）我的生活费用里扣除。）
In early 2015, I was in the situation that I could not receive scheduled living expenses providing had prompted me to call law enforcement's help to check out if I did inherit anything. Later I heard the living expenses were all paid out as scheduled, but there have been soo many doubts if I inherited was because the attorney who informed me to the teleconference meetings don't remember anything other than he did schedule both meetings on June 30th of 2004 and July 1st of 2004.
（2015年1月，我当时就是因为受不到预期的生活费用给付而报警处理希望警方调查一下我的继承究竟是真是假。后来听说我的生活费用给付都已经按时付出，但因为通知我参加2004年6月30日及7月1日电讯会议的律师除了记得有安排我开会之外就什么都不记得，所以有很多人不相信我的继承是真实的而造成我收不到生活费用给付。）
I heard there were some people attained the meeting also had the same frustration that the person who informed them to attain the meeting did not know anything about inheriting related. Other than I can clarify my inheriting is the sole beneficiary Trust-inheriting, I really don't know anything about their possible stories at all. So, I advise them from my own experience: Contact the law enforcement with all the references you can provide, either your local law enforcement agency or also the informer's resident's local law enforcement agency. It is unlikely anyone without any lawful authorization could help you to do the necessary search on any financial matter or if you had inherited anything.
（我听说还有一些人也有类似遭遇，就是通知他们参加某个讨论过什么继承话题的会议的人完全不知道他们有没有什么可以继承的。我除了强调我自己的继承是唯一受益人的信托继承之外，我就完全不知道他们这些人的故事可能会是什么了。所以，从我自己的经历，我建议他们报警处理，提供他们所知道的一切信息给他们自己所居住国家的当地警方以及通知他们参加什么继承会议的那个人所居住国家的当地警方。在没有正当法律授权的情况下，没有人可以帮助他们进行必要的财务调查或者是否有继承财产的调查。）
I can totally imagine what is like when all you know is you were informed to be in a meeting that inheriting was discussed while you have your own family stories about wealth as well. Please contact your local government agency with all the references you can provide. My inheriting is totally nothing to do with your possible inheritable.
（我很能想象那些家里有财产故事的人被通知参加什么谈论过继承话题的会议会是什么样一份焦虑心情。请通知你们当地的政府机关并提供你们所知道的一切信息。你们是否有什么财产可以继承和我信托继承完全没有任何关系。）
I figured that this morning's intention is to "donate" the paid-out $400Million a year living expenses without my own willingness in order to continue the abducting me in financial poverty efforts. I refuse to donate any taxes from the already paid-out $400Million a year living expense. I refuse to let my tax-donation willingness to become the excuses to make myself a victim of possible armed public abducting nor possible armed public robbery.
（我估计今天早上这集的目的就是要违背我本人的意愿“捐税了”我的每年4亿的生活费用给付，继续把我绑架在贫穷里。我拒绝从我每年的4亿的生活费用里捐税。我拒绝将我自己的捐税意愿变成让我成为武装绑架武装抢劫的受害者的借口。）
----August 9th, 2018
Regarding the confusion over why China's government representatives not presented in my inheriting meeting on June 30th of 2004.（有关为什么没有中国政府官员出席2004年6月30日我的继承会议的疑问）
My response: （我的回应：）
My Trust-inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was by Laws that neither the entrusting groups nor myself would need any authorization from the Chinese government even though I was a Chinese citizen, and I spoke fluent English myself which means I didn't need Chinese representatives to do any language translations. So, not a single Chinese government's representative attended to my inheriting meeting.
（我在2004年6月30日的信托继承是根据法律继承，所以虽然我当时是中国公民，但代表那些信托的律师团及我本人都不需要中国政府的任何授权，而且我本人可以用流利英语表达，也不需要中国政府代表作为语言交流的翻译。所以没有任何一个中国政府官员出席我的信托继承会议。）
----August 9th, 2018
08-08-2018 Exactly, what are the confusions about Shanghai Investments (究竟有关上海的投资有些什么困扰啊？）
Heard there are rumors in Shanghai that if I receive my living expenses providing, somebody dares to forcefully replace a CEO from a Shanghai investment（听说了上海在传说是只要我能拿到生活费用给付，就会有某人敢把某家上海外资企业的总经理给武力置换了）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard this somebody is not my blood associated and the investment is not from the Hong Kong Trust. I heard my father's sister's marriage issue is one of the confusion（我听说这某人和我没什么血缘关系，这个投资企业也和香港信托没有关系.我听说是我父亲妹妹的婚姻问题造成了这份困扰。）
1: Since 1989, it is well-known that one of my father's sister's children is not from her marriage. And I am ok with that.（从1989年起，很多人就听说了我父亲妹妹的一个小孩可能不是婚生子，而我好像不是很在意。）
Why shouldn't I? I am her maiden brother's child, why shouldn't say such things as "why not try to move on when the child was already 14 years old in 1989?” I heard the couples fought often on the child's possible birth-origin, and I heard my father's sister always emphasized she raised this child by her own money from her maiden father or her own (much higher) salary. Also, it is true that divorce was not an option in China for a marriage in their generation. She got married in her 30s after my grandfather's death, and her husband was not a college-graduated as herself. Why should I take her marriage issue beyond her private matter?
（1：从1989年起，很多人就听说了我父亲妹妹的一个小孩可能不是婚生子，而我好像不是很在意。）
我为什么会在意啊，我是女方娘家哥哥的小孩，我为什么不应该劝劝说些”你现在说这些，那你是想继续过日子还是想怎样啊？这孩子都已经14岁了”。我是有听说夫妻俩吵架时女方始终强调女方自己是用自己娘家给的钱或者自己的高工资自己养的这个小孩。更何况在中国，离婚在他们那一辈根本就是没有可能。她是我爷爷去世以后结的婚，结婚时都已经三十多岁了，她本人大学毕业，丈夫不是大学毕业生。哪里轮得到我把她的婚姻问题超越她自己的私事范畴？）
2: I don't have any bias against the children from or not from the marriage.
Why would I? I am their birth mother's maiden brother's child, as long as they both from her belly, why would I have any bias on who is from the marriage?
（2：我对是否婚生好像没有态度上的区别？
我为什么要有态度上的区别？我是女方娘家哥哥的小孩，只要两个孩子都是女方自己肚皮生下来的，我作为女方娘家亲眷，哪里会在乎是否婚生啊？）
3: I still missed a link here: I can definitely get my living expenses provided lawfully in the U.S. via the American companies, but how this becomes the eligibility to forcefully replace a CEO in Shanghai investments? These investments are obviously not from the Hong Kong Trust that was set up by my father's father.
(3： 我还是不明白：我是肯定可以在美国合法拿到我自己所继承的信托通过美国公司给付的生活费用的，可是这怎么就成了某人可以把一个外企的总经理给武力置换了的资格啦？这些外企都是很明确肯定不是我父亲的父亲所设立的香港信托所投资的。）
In my family's generational inheriting history, under-age children would each receive a Trust, which was the size of his inheritable share, from the dying father as a family tradition in family-inheriting. It is not unimaginable that some of my grandfathers from different generations would set up an additional Trust as a gift to the unborn-yet-me.（在我们家的继承分家产的家史上，每一代分家产时，未成年的儿子们每人都会收到一个由病危老父亲所设立的信托，所受到信托的大小规模也就是这个儿子所分到的家产份额。所以我有几代的爷爷们再额外设立一个信托作为礼物给还未出生的我并不是什么难以想象的事情。）
Hong Kong Trust as an example, it is obviously well-understood as being part of what my grandfather had been willing to give to my father, because the Hong Kong Trust was set up for me, and I was expected as a girl who would be from my father's line, which means the Hong Kong Trust I received was understood as the part of the heir son's share that my grandfather willing to give to my father. The Hong Kong Trust was set up in 1948, it was 17 years before my grandfather's death in 1965 so that my Trust-inheriting should not be understood as if taking advantage of my father's siblings. It should be the same for all other Trusts I inherited so that my Trust-inheriting should not be understood as if my inheriting means taking advantage of each settler's other offspring's inheritable share.（就以香港信托作为例子，就因为这个信托是为我设立的，而我应该是我父亲的小孩，所以很明显这个信托是我父亲的父亲愿意分给我父亲的财产的一部分。香港信托是1948年设立的，而我父亲的父亲是香港信托设立17年之后的1965年才去世的，所以我继承香港信托不应该被认为是我抢了我父亲弟妹所应该分到的我爷爷的财产。对于我所继承的其他信托来说也是一样，我继承了这个那个信托不应该被理解成我抢了信托设立人的其他子女的可继承份额。）
The generational family inheriting at my father's father's generation was in 1930 which was the first time ever same mother's children family inheriting, this certainly means my Trust-Inheriting in 2004 should not have any confusion at all with all other lines' offspring generationally. The closest generational family inheriting was in 1965, my father's father had his own written letters which were his last wills handed in-person to each of his children who were my father and his siblings. So, my Trust inheriting in 2004 should have no confusion with my father's sibling as well.（我爷爷即我父亲的父亲那一代分家产是在1930年，这是我家有史以来第一次是由同一个妈妈生的孩子们在分家产，这当然是很清楚地表明我2004年继承信托是和我家历史上各房各代的其他所有子女都没有任何关系。我家历史上最近的一次分家产是1965年我爷爷去世时，我父亲的父亲是亲自给了他的每一个子女一份亲笔信也就是我爷爷给了我父亲及我父亲的弟妹每人一份他的亲笔遗嘱。所以，我2004年继承信托也不应该会让我父亲的弟妹们很困绕。）
I had expressed myself the reason why I was willing to gift to my grandfather's siblings was that if my father was not being "skipped" but inherited Hong Kong Trust, he would willing to gift to his uncle and his aunt, the same to his siblings. So, I do the gifting for my father. (我从2004年就一直有说，我愿意送礼物给我爷爷的弟妹是因为如果是我父亲继承了香港信托，而不是被“绕过去了”，我父亲是会愿意送给他的叔叔娘娘一份和他自己弟妹一样大小规模的礼物的。所以，我就替我父亲送了这个礼物了。）
----August 8th, 2018
08-07-2018 就是和你没有关系就得 （"We Don't like this person very much")
听说了今天早上提到的“希望还能有个自己亲生的小孩”(Heard this morning's talk about "Just hope to have a biological child.")
08-06-2018 What is this morning's broadcasting? Oh, a comedy of black jokes (今天早上所播出的都是些什么呀？奥， 也就是一堆的黑色幽默相声啦）
In China, a standup comedy show type that can have one performer's which is called the Single Xiangsheng（单口相声), or more than one performers, called the Crosstalk Xiangsheng（多口相声). The crosstalk Xiangsheng（多口相声）normally grouped by one front talker plus the commenting or contradicting voices to make a show. I assume this crosstalk Xiangsheng（多口相声）is this morning's broadcasting artistic structure. (在中国，相声有两种，单口相声或者多口相声。多口相声一般是有一个讲故事的主寅演员再加几个对故事内容表达不同意见或者进行评论的配寅演员来进行演出。我估计多口相声是今天早上所播出内容的艺术表达形式。）
The U.S citizenship talks: Loud announcing voices and low mild contradicting voices are cousins, the technique is to let the "You won't be a citizen" impression to stay.
（有关美国公民的片段：响亮宣布的声音和那些很轻很柔的不同意见的声音是三四个堂兄妹一家子。技巧就在于让听众就只记得”你不会是个美国公民啦”）
Who are they, why legitimate process?
Oh, they are O'Connors.
(说话的那几个都是谁啊？为什么说是通过立法程序后？
奥，他们几个都是欧家的少爷和小姐啦。）
Why they are so emotional about your immigration status?
Oh, my entry visa to the U.S. was a visitor's B1 visa. I was invited to the U.S. by an investment of the "O's confusion" fund company, the same "O's confusion" fund which has been the American investment from the French company which provides the lawful eligibility for me to claim: "I am the French Financier".
（为什么他们对你的移民身份这么在意啊？
奥，我当初进入美国是持B1（短期访问参观）签证。我是被美国的“欧家困扰”基金公司所投资的一个美国企业所邀请来美国的，还记得我宣称我自己是“英国东印度公司的法国投资人”吗，我这么自我宣称自己投资了一家法国公司不是莫名其妙的而是有法律基础的，而这家美国的“欧家困扰”基金公司就是这一家法国公司所投资的。）
The Pardon announced in 2007 on the radio was addressed to the inappropriateness of how I was invited, not that I had a legal immigration case.
(那个2007年所播出的赦免令是针对我受邀来美国过程中的一些不恰当的地方，并不是因为我有一个移民官司需要赦免令才能结案。）
So, I am a U.S. citizen has been a True Statement.
（所以，我是美国公民一直是真实陈述。)
----August 6th, 2018
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony's creator talks: The "she is so annoying" announcement is the purpose of this talk, which is to express how awful I am to alert everyone who doesn't even have any kind of association with me. I don't need to say a lot to fight against this saying on this blog because this saying is a serious criminal law matter in the United States that may take a trial to clear the public impression, the same seriousness as who is the authentic 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony's creator.
（2008年北京奥运会开幕式创意的那一段：宣称“她得罪了太多人了”是这一段所想要表达的，目的就是想要提醒所有还不认识方敏本人并且和方敏本人没有任何交往关系的人知道方敏其实是个什么样的人。就像谁才是2008北京奥运会的创意人一样，这在美国都是非常严肃的可能牵涉到美国刑事法律范畴的事情，可能会需要有刑事诉讼官司来彻底澄清事件真相的，所以我不需要在这博客上多费唇舌来反击来辩解这些故意恶意的行为所制造的恶劣影响。）
So,（所以,)
I am the 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony's authentic Creator has been a True Statement. （我是2008北京奥运会开幕式闭幕式的创意人一直都是真实陈述。）
I was not "so annoying" to everyone before my Trust-inheriting in 2004 is a True Statement as well. （我在2004年继承信托之前从来没有如此招人讨厌也真实陈述。）
----August 6th, 2018
08-04-2018 My lawfully valid Trust-inheriting eligible me to claim I am the British East India Company's French Financier
I am the sole beneficiary of the Trust that has been the upstream investor to the famous British East India Company's French Financer company. My lawfully valid Trust-Inheriting was on June 30th of 2004.
The same as the Hong Kong Trust which was also set up before I was born, I am the sole beneficiary of this several hundred years ancient Trust because I am the "female family birthmark" clearly specified in the settler's letter with an illustration of the birthmark. The Hong Kong Trust entity's management has already explained on the radio program that the settler's letter has a birthmark illustration attached.
The accurate definitions of the word "Trust", the word "Inheriting", and the word "beneficiary" are according to the Merriam-Webster English Dictionary, the accurate definition of the word "sole "is according to the Merriam-Webster English Thesaurus.
Definition of Inherit
2. a: to receive from an ancestor as a right or title descendible by law at the ancestor's death.
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inheriting)
Definition of Trust
3. b: a combination of firms or corporations formed by a legal agreement; especially: one that reduces or threatens to reduce competition
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trust )
Definition of Beneficiary
2 a law: the person designated to receive the income of an estate that is subject to a trust.
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/beneficiary )
Synonyms and Antonyms of Sole
1: belonging only to the one person, unit, or group named.
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/sole )
----August 4th, 2018
08-03-2018 我选择捍卫我自己及我父母的人身财产安全
听说了今天早上所播出的我父母的亲生儿子坚持婚姻自由坚决要求财务给付的立场。
我是方敏，我本人是亲身经历了我父母亲生的儿子为了他自己的婚姻自由，嫌我父母在我父母用我父母自己工资购买的房子里非常多余碍事，我认为我父母的亲生儿子是自己愿意为了他自己的婚姻自由让我父母“双亡”也没有任何悲伤，我甚至怀疑他本人是否参与谋杀我父亲。我方敏拒绝我亲生父母的亲生儿子所提出的任何财务要求，我方敏已经表达和我亲生父母的亲生儿子的婚姻家庭既没有任何法律上的责任义务关系，也没有任何意愿上的任何关联。
我本人也亲身了中国政府为了捍卫我父母亲生儿子的这一份婚姻自由，完全无视我父亲2013年时是中国公民的事实，中国政府在国际舆论上的立场表达就是中国政府为了捍卫婚姻自由就不会在乎所牵涉到的其他中国公民的人生财产安全。中国政府所持有的立场就是完全不会在乎中国是否还是法制国家，中国政府的一切立场言论就只有中国政府非常在乎性交女人奶子屁股利益的国际舆论表达，这一切都是我方敏亲身经历。
所以，我方敏不应该是愿意看着我亲生父母的亲生儿子为了他自己的婚姻自由而死绝拉到，但我方敏选择不过问我亲生父母的亲生儿子为了他自己的婚姻自由而如何生活。
我方敏选择捍卫我自己及我父母的人身财产安全，我方敏选择捍卫我自己的合法权益，我方敏选择协助我的父母捍卫他们的合法权益。
----2018年8月3日。
-----------------------------------------
听到了所谓“只要她的丈夫是我同父同母的弟弟，
我的回应：
在我得知我弟弟支持我的父母年迈后是不需要有人在乎是否冷了饿了
我不会要求他们以及他们背后那些人的改变，
我相信我的父亲很好，我也在找我母亲的故事。
----2018年3月16日。
08-02-2018 This morning's broadcasting of the anger related to the wealth I announced.
1: "Announce to own".
My response: This anger is ridiculous and untrue.
I announced them in 2017-2018 after they had provided for me according to their lawfully registered lawful owners' clear instructions. All four companies have acknowledged four Trust entities I inherited are their upstream investors. Two of these four companies' paying checks to my living expenses already have been verified as upon lawful instructions as well. The other two companies are in process of clarifying. All these four Trust entities I inherited are over 500 years ancient.
----August 2nd, 2018
2: "No such big sized company in New York city without a grand building"
My response: This anger is ridiculous and untrue.
These companies are all Fund companies which means they are all financial institutes but not banks which further means no crowded customers to need huge spaces for.
----August 2nd, 2018
3:"Why it has to be your money?"
My response: This anger is ridiculous, dangerous and unlawful.
In the United States, this anger means the intention of illegally taking over the lawful ownership of lawfully owned money, this is the anger may trigger the crime of larceny or the crime of robbery.
In the United States, any money's legal ownership is decided by U.S. laws, not by deservedness nor wishes.
In the United States, the legal ownership is what law enforcement protecting.
In the United States, if there are lawful doubts over money's ownership, a civil lawsuit or a criminal investigation are the lawful means to clarify money's ownership.
----August 2nd, 2018
4: "Why you refuse to bow to my wife?"
My response: This anger is ridiculous, pathetic, sick and psycho.
I am a female who never fancy your wife's sexuality nor your wife's reproductive function. When I don't eat on you, don't sleep on you, and don't intend to be around your sickness, I certainly have no obligation nor need to privilege your marriage.
----August 2nd, 2018
08-01-2018 This morning's theme is obviously to contradict who I am
Heard this morning's talk about Roche Brothers' ownership.
My response:
Roche Brothers is a supermarket chain that has been very popular in Boston Massachusetts area, I assumed I may have "my enveloped money" provided by this Roche Brothers was what I had stated on this blog July 30th of 2018. My assumption does not involve any ownership confusion because I have the same question of "Do you have my money reserved at your place" for the Boston government agencies as well, and my assumption may only mean Roche Brothers' supermarket's store gift cards
I heard Roche Brothers chain is 100% privately owned. I heard this morning's anger was caused by the confusion who owns this Roche Brothers chain. I heard this confusion was sparked by a company which was registered in March of 2017 which has nothing to do with Roche Brothers at all, but the words of mouths caused severe confusion who owns the Roche Brothers.
----August 1st, 2018
Exactly, what was the theme of this morning broadcasting?
My response:
The theme of this morning's broadcasting was to contradict everything about who I am.
Example: I am a female resident who has well known lived alone for over 14 years without any social, but this doesn't evidently enough compares to the broadcasted comments from those males' authoritative saying on the matter of who I am. I accused this is an organized sexual harassment.
"Everyone in Boston, Massachusetts already know you don't have any money" because it was broadcasted on the radio program and on local radio to contradict everything of who I am. And this does not include all these authoritative figures' public or private opinions on the matter or about who I am. Now, you can imagine what my situation has been. It has been all over the Boston area since 2016, even in a coffee shop of Dunkin Donuts.
Also, I heard there was some radio broadcasted announcement equivalent or promotion similar in Boston area about who owns the American "Pejoves" Fund company as well. Those broadcasting were jokingly mentioning the owner of a 2007-registered 10 years old company is the real person who owns the American "Pejoves" Fund's most upstream investor which wrongfully impressed the audiences as if this only 10 years old, 2007-registered company owns the 400 years old American "Pejoves" Fund company as well as its entire ancient investor chain.
I heard there is another announcement similar to this, by a different person on a national TV in Spain and by a different reason as well. The given-reason for the ownership in Spain was not because of a company registration but because she has commercially married to a huge Mr. American whose family name never associated with the American "Pejoves" Fund company nor its investor chain.
----August 1st, 2018
07-31-2018 Why Mr. David R's clan kept on picking up on me?
I don't know what is the matter with this David R's clan. I never met anyone of them in person, but I had lived in New York City between 1996-2003 so I might have shared New York City's streets with them.
This clan had invested movies such as Avatar, 007 Quantum and 007 Millenium, etc. but my intellectual income from these movies were pre-company taxes' business expenses which should have nothing to do with them being investors.
I have claimed 4 American Funds companies as the following list, all of which have been operating on the American soil since 1600 or so. All of these have never owned nor operated by any R's name historically. I have claimed each having $200Billion size on this blog since the year of 2017 according to the "200" I was told about Portugal's American Fund Company in the year of 2004 and facts that it could easily donate sports-related event for "$200Million each" as I had wished in 2004 as well. Later, I reannounced each of these American companies having $600Billion size to wish good lucks to all :
1: Janus Mutual Fund's American Fund Investor company who has a Portagul investor company. (The first year's providing paying company)
2: Amtrak company's American Fund Investor company whose French investor is the famous French Financier company of the British East India company. (The second year's providing paying company)
3: American "Pejoves" Fund who share's the same Spanish Investor company with New York City's Jacob K. Javits Convention Center. (The third year's providing paying company)
4: Lehman Brother's American Fund Investor company who has a French Investor. (The fourth year's providing paying company)
I heard all of these have been my Trust entities' investments since established. All these Trusts I inherited in 2004 were set up by my birth Chinese grandfathers from different generations. The earliest of the above four Trusts I mentioned was set up around the year of 700AD.
I heard most of these "$200Million each" was donated by the investments of those Trust entities I inherited. I heard Mr. David R's clan's investments had donated about $600Million total.
I heard this morning that "600Million already" was expressed annoyingly by Mr. David R's clan in the year of 2004 when I requested it, but I never directed my "$200Million each" request to them nor their relatives nor other rich names, I did not know them nor was told who they are, nor if they would willing to spend on me. Why this clan took my request their expenses?
I heard yesterday's broadcasting that "the Ford Businesses don't have such a monthly $10,000 wired to China story" was said by a Mrs. Jessica R from this clan who is never a Miss Ford. But this "monthly $10,000 wired to China" story was either told or explained on the radio by one of the Ford Businesses' Investor company that Mrs. Jessica R is very certain of. Exactly, what is Mrs. Jessica R implying? By the way, I heard she is the wife of the Mister who had the 1980's Tokyo airport romance with a Chinese.
So, I still don't know what has been the issue impressive as this morning's broadcasting. And, what it implies in the saying of "Why it has to be your money" has alerted me so I have tipped the law people about it.
----July 31st of 2018
07-30-2018 Hong Kong Trust & Where is my money? （香港信托及我的钱在哪？）
Heard this morning's talk about Hong Kong Trust.（听说了今天早上有谈到了香港信托）
07-29-2018 The cold emotion && 什么是公厕门外一元？
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the emotions.
My response:
Janus mutual fund has been an investment from the four American companies I have claimed that had provided for me. Because the first year's and second year's companies' related confusion have been clarified. So, this possibly is some joint confused area of the third and fourth year's Amercian companies.
I had this cold feeling when I was still in Janus Associates in 2003-2004. Before that, I was just someone would come at 8:30 and leave at 5PM or so who could sit in front a computer alone all day long, an absolute outsider in any social chat among staffs. And this spinning up and spinning out feeling, I was only an element in the center, not any kind of power source, that I need to keep some balance in the entire process. The research director was ousted in October of 2003 when I was in Boston, MA, so I don't know what had happened. I relocated back to Connecticut, after only two months moving up to Boston of Massachusetts that I had insisted on. I had complained about my exhausted health situation in January of 2004's inheriting related birth-identification verification meeting, I was asked to leave a month later. I survived.
----July 29th, 2018
About Hong Kong Trust.（关于香港信托）
My response: （我的回应：）
1: If not intentional, the best way to explain so many confusion is to simulate setting up a Trust with an attorney to know how I can the sole beneficiary person specified by the settler's letter before I was born. A Trust is a legal instrument registered to specify who is the beneficiary of this much money given by the Settler.（如果不是故意骚扰，对这个疑问最好的解释方式就是去找个律师模拟一下办理信托的过程，来了解为什么我还没出生就可以成为信托的唯一受益人。信托是一种委托第三方来管理某一笔钱并可以指定谁才是此一笔钱的受益人的法律手段。）
2: Trust entity is an organization that registered in a local government agency, such as the Department of State of NYC. This Trust entity is an organization set up for the purpose of using the money in the Trust to invest.（信托机构是一个向地方政府如纽约市政府等注册成立的机构。成立一个信托机构的目的就是为了用我爷爷所信托的钱来投资。）
3-1: Hong Kong Trust as an example: My grandfather set up a Hong Kong Trust worth $15Million U.S. dollar (5Million DaYang 大洋) with an attorney in1948 and specified who should be the beneficiary person of in his handwriting settler's letter.（香港信托作为例子：我爷爷委托律师用一千五百万美金也就是5百万大洋在1948年时设立了一个信托并在亲笔书写的委托信里制定了谁才是受益人。）
3-2: In order to invest this entrusted $15Million U.S. dollar(5Million DaYang大洋), I heard this attorney later registered a Trust entity with the British Hong Kong government. In 1971, I heard it was this Trust entity had updated its registration record of legal representatives. Cheung Kong Holdings (长江实业), the attorney firm and the accounting firm are the business associations of this Trust entity. This Trust entity has been 100% privately owned by the Hong Kong Trust which was set up in 1948 by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren(方智仁). I am the settler and sole beneficiary person of the Hong Kong Trust since 2004.（为了用这笔一千五百万美金即五百万的大洋来投资，我听说这个律师就向当时的英国香港政府注册了一家金融机构。我听说就是这家金融机构在1971年更改了登记记录增加了一个法人代表。长江实业，律师公司及会计师公司都是这家金融机构的业务往来。这家金融机构是100%由我爷爷1948年设立的香港信托拥有，自2004年7月起，我是这个香港信托的委托人及唯一的受益人。）
----July 29th, 2018
据说是华国锋的长子在南京的鼓楼广场那儿的公共厕所外面在陈x肚子里下的种。
我的回应：
我是听说了，不止一次地下种努力，一块钱一次的下种机会，估计就是要趁着还是独生子女政策，就是要让陈x的丈夫断子绝孙的努力。
如果是真的，那是婚姻自由，只要陈x的丈夫自己乐意断子绝孙就得。我说华国锋这个婊子养的狗杂种生的是个狗屎没人要的烂货儿子，理由如下：
我就只认得我自己的亲爹亲妈。
----2018年7月29日。
听说了今天早上又来愤怒质问为什么是我的钱。
我的回应：
这已经是有意识地在骚扰了。谁是幕后人物？明明是中国司法部，美国司法部都已经澄清了没有任何会让中国公民可以号称很困扰的钱。我是我爷爷方智仁1948年所设立的香港信托的唯一受益人，我所宣称的其他信托也都是只有一个受益人的信托。没有任何理会需要由中国政府来撑腰让任何中国为我宣称有钱如此莫名其妙的愤怒。我既不吃中国国库的钱，也没逼着任何一个中国公民给我寄钱买饭吃，哪来的这份需要煽动这份莫名其妙的仇恨？我说我有钱让谁的日子过不下去了？
能够想象，我说以下的话会引发一些愤怒：比如说：我说这中国现任国家领导人习近平李克强不过是个婊子养的吃剩饭的货才会需要以性交成果性交能力为骄傲，才会认为他们肯吃的奶子就是可以领导中国13亿人民的实力，也就是说，别说是中国的13亿人民，就是全世界的44亿人民，都不可能不馋那国髀奶子的滋味而俯首帖耳的啊，就不可能不知道有生育能力就够资格违反国家计划生意政策，要是再多生了几个孩子让民政局养着，那才是真真实实明明确确对中国13亿人民最大的贡献了。听说都已经是雄心壮志绝对乐意靠国髀一个人的子宫就可以让中国人口力争上看14亿了，再多花点国库的钱，再让13亿普通老百姓的孩子没饭吃没衣穿饿死饿绝了拉到，那对中国人民的贡献得有多大啊，等等。据说国髀大家庭威胁恐吓的希望我可以尊重国髀，可我身上又没长个吊，有什么需要来尊重这些国家领导人也就只有性交能力可以骄傲展示的事实，或者也就只有够资格舔舔剩饭否则就得断子绝孙的成果可以满世界宣布招摇的本事?
中国13亿人民会说这种说法就算中肯善意，确实是全心全意为了中国13亿人民的福祉，那也实在是难听，能不能换个方式说，对吧？换个方式来说？方家大小姐我目前可没这打算。我现在是在说我自己有钱，又不是在说就只有猪狗才会去操你们的国髀屁股之类的，需要中国的国家领导人带领13亿人民都为你们的国髀没钱而愤怒吗？那就把中国人民的国库送给你们的国髀以表达你们13亿中国人民对你们国髀的热爱吗？有需要飞跃重洋跑来美国来表达你们中国人民对你们中国的国髀没有中国国库的钱可以自由随便花的那份愤怒吗？中国国库就在中国，不过中国人民可是自1949年就已经站起来了，到了1990年代就已经全国万众一心组成新的长城了，怪道不远万里对我吼个不停。我在美国二十年日子过的好好，冷不丁一片混乱，却原来是天上掉下来了一个来自中华人民共和国的抢钱一族。
----2018年7月29日。
07-28-2018 This morning's broadcasting of a public robbery scene in reality.
I heard it was another extortion radio show full of threats and bilking for Mr. Albert Gore's beloved this or that person's deservedness to have some money. I heard the money was given as demanded as you heard on the radio, so I contacted law people through a law website.
I refuse to be a victim of a public robbery as such, it is astonishing how they dare to conduct such public extortion, not to mention using public media to perform such public microphone armed robbery.
I don't understand why Albert Gore can have such power after all these years to be so superior above U.S laws without a public office's privilege?
I often joked why would any accountant willing to steal money for someone else in order to keep only a fraction? All the criminal charges will be this accountant's alone, for only a fraction?
Why would all these producers willing to let the possible criminal investigation open for themselves but watching other people getting cash by just speaking to the microphone they are employed to operate? All possible charges against abusive use of the public media will be against these producers as well as the radio company, while they are concerned about their own income and watch those speakers spending the cash, that is if the prominent American riches are willing to pay for all the financial losses to the victims of this radio program's such scheme. Who are these so smart producers?
Also, why this radio company rather file bankruptcy but refuses to fire those who are the reasons for this public scheme?
The public audiences don't need to be taught such a lesson that anyone's money can be taken against their own wishes publicly in the United States with all the U.S. law people watching.
Those businesses don't need this public exposure as if they can steal investors' money so publicly and so easily.
I don't need them to reveal how much money I am supposed to be provided for, it is none of the public audiences' business.
I refuse to be the excuse for this kind of public robbery scene in reality.
I was asked if I am "a farm animal raised to be slaughtered for meat" by the Chinese government, I say I am lucky I am a U.S. citizen now. But I don't know how many former Chinese citizens are also "raised to be slaughtered for meat" worldwide, and I don't know if this is a popular trend in the United States somewhere, but seems not a trend popular in the U.S. government sector.
----July 28th, 2018
07-27-2018 Wealth under entrusting means hellish anxiety（一旦财产信托，真是苦不堪言）
Now it's imaginable what makes me scream in my apartment that I need $6Million cash in my backpack daily so I can be anxiety-free for 50 years. I was comforted it is expected as such for any wealth under-entrusting case.
I am already so much better, my entrusting attorneys possibly not only spread money all over places as a routine practice but also put me into the welfare system. I haven't received any money other than the welfare help in my daily living.
Then, why entrust? The wealth itself can be under great protection if the owner can't take care of the wealth for some reason.
I heard it is obvious that Yu's offspring in Hong Kong and Boston haven't followed their family teaching yet. After yesterday, I would assume it is the Hong Kong Trust possibly under pressure. It seems like Yu’s has been a historically well-known family in China.
（现在可以想象我为什么扯着嗓门的要求，我收到钱就要放六百万美金随身带，足够50年不用担心下个月有没有生活费了。据说一旦办理财产信托，就得准备过这种日子。
我的情况真是已经很好了，我的信托律师估计除了照信托行业的常规到处放点钱看我能不能收到之外，还把我给放进了社服救济综援系统。生活费用给付？我至今除了综援就什么钱都没有收到。
那为什么还要办理信托啊？如果因为什么原因造成自己不能照看财富，办理信托可以让财富得到最大程度的保护和保障。
老爸爸：现在已经已经越来越好了，还是要把现金扣紧。
妈妈：希望你还在，希望你很好，也是要把钱扣紧，身边稍微放点现金。只要你照顾好自己，老爸爸和我能够照顾好自己。
听说今天早上很明显，香港和波士顿的于家后裔还不需要追随于家家训。在昨天的澄清之后，我估计是我爷爷替我设立的香港信托压力很大。看样子，于家在中国估计是有点历史名气的。）
----July 27th, 2018
07-26-2018 Are Yu-s actually Li, Zicheng's offspring? (于家是不是闯王李自成的后裔啊？）
Heard this frustration of "why Min Fang can have morning by post ownership on the web"（听说了有关”为什么方敏就可以在网上宣布宣布就可以有这钱那钱“的气愤.
My response:（我的回应：）
If I respond harshly, I would ask do you ever have an IQ evaluated? The explanation: why don't you repeat your supporting analysis why you say so?（粗鲁版本的回应：你有没有一丁点的智商啊？解释：你自己重复一下你自己刚才说的愤怒理由及你自己的分析？）
The politer way to respond: I posted on the internet web in 2017-2018 stating I received this much money paid in October of 2014, October of 2015, October 2016, and October 2017 from these companies, you also have heard all have been confirmed as the true and lawfully instructed payment by the paying companies. What is wrong with your logic to say I claim to own knowing the truth is I
just announced what I have received or I am expecting to receive?（客气一点的版本：我是在2017年-2018年期间在网上公布我是在2014年10月，2015年10月，2016年10月，2017年10月分别受到了这些公司所支付的这些款项，你们也都听到这些公司出面证实我所言属实且这些支付都是按上级公司指示合法支付。你们逻辑有问题才会如此颠倒。明明是我在网上宣布我已经收到钱，你们就给颠倒成我是在宣布我想要这些钱？）
The correct statement is "Min Fang announced what she has received or been expecting to receive on the web."（正确的说法应该是“方敏在网上宣布了所收到的钱以及还在等着收的钱。”）
----July 26th, 2018
Heard this morning's Yu's tough attitude of "give us the money" and declaring of relative- relationship.（听说了今天早上于家的强硬立场“给偶们拿钱来”以及所宣布的“统统都是亲戚”)。
My response:（我的回应：）
This reminds me of one historic name in China: "Li, Zicheng (闯王李自成)", a historically famous gang people. （这倒是让我想起了中国的一个历史人物的名字”闯王李自成，中国历史上很有名的一个占山为王的帮派头子。）
In English tales, Robin Hood enjoyed rob rich person to help poor and in-need, this infamous Li, Zicheng (李自成)'s name in Chinese tales were different, this Li, Zicheng (李自成)'s name never means helps in-needs but deserve to own by themselves in Chinese tales.（在英语故事里，罗宾汉是打家劫舍乐于助人救难的豪侠，这个闯王李自成的名字在中国的传说里不是这样的，闯王李自成的名子不是打劫为了救难而是就是应该全归他们自己所有。）
What makes this name famous in Chinese tales was how they grouped as a gang, the talent told in all Chinese tales has been "how to create relatives without blood association", now, what you heard this morning may be the presentation from the offspring.（这个名字在中国民间故事里很出名的是他们是如何结帮成伙的。所有的中国民间故事都是在讲闯王李自成是如何的有了”一百零八将”的结拜兄弟姊妹. 你们今天早上听到的可能就是这个闯王李自成的后裔所做的李自成后裔家族的“才华展示会”。)
All these Yu-s may be the offspring of this famous Li, Zicheng (闯王李自成) is definitely my speculation at this minute of today. I am positive it can be confirmed.（我猜测所有这些于姓人士可能都是闯王李自成的后裔，但我还真是很自信这猜测估计是可以被证实的。）
WIkipedia----Li_Zicheng
维基----闯王李自成
----July 26th, 2018
Heard this morning's saying of "thousands" and "give up".（听说了今天早上的“加个千”以及“放弃了”）
My response: Yes, I heard. (我的回应：是啊，我听说了)。
----July 26th, 2018
07-25-2018 Why a radio program can be so all mighty powerful beyond entertainment
Heard this morning's talk of the "since 2007 marriage".
My response:
I heard this has been no secret in the U.S. entertainment industry since 2007. I heard it was late Mr. David Rockefeller took Mister out of his personal life situation which I 100% have no problem at all, but I don't know if against his wish or as he wishes. I do think late Mr. David Rockefeller would be very great on this matter if it was as that Mister had wished.
I have nothing to do with this Mister has been a true statement.
----July 25th, 2018
Regarding why a radio program can be so all mighty powerful beyond entertainment?
My response:
I heard a majority of China's Central Political Committee's members married to a Chinese entertainment personnel. Tons of practicing power in this radio program producing and promoting that anyone can imagine.
I heard the Rockefeller's name has been the "Rock and Roll" powerhouse in the U.S. business world through this radio program's producing and promoting, and it is all about my matters should be their deservedness to meddle. It has been all about "I said so, Don't I deserve so, What do you mean it is not my privilege..." on the radio about matters that one would not consider their matters or not their privileges or not their deservedness in the United States or by the United States laws.
In Boston of Massachusetts, Boston Mayor Marty Walsh has been rumored the reason of all these on-street and in-reality promoting whatever was announced on the radio except for such "unpleasant" announcements as "Min Fang's inheriting in 2004 was legally valid" by the U.S. Justice Department, or "Min Fang has money" from the U.S. business, etc., all from the same radio program which he has been supporting.
I have sent two emails to Boston Mayor's office already, one is about my possible intellectual income which had already paid handsome Massachusetts Income tax, taxes were not paid in my name because of some of this radio program's announcements but definitely my earning's taxes. The other one is about my Hong Kong trust entity I inherited which has been announced on the same radio program. I don't know why Boston city has such huge problems to help me with food and cash via its welfare system. In the United States, I don't pay any income tax to a city by the U.S. laws.
Other than myself, who else would be impacted because of all these orchestrated efforts of producing & promoting this radio program as such? Well, there was some rumor that can ask this question the most illustrative.
If a government official in-office who has a personal interest in my inheriting story is willing to give an "administrative order from this person's office" if an administrative order can be given by any public office, and the order is to order police officer to open fire at me on the street to "prevent disappointment from those who want some money".
By the U.S. Constitution, by the U.S. government administrative related laws and by all U.S. federal or state laws, U.S. government official can't give such administrative order as "open fire to a civilian who does not carry firearms". So, what will happen if some police officers willing to carry out such administrative order from a valid public office, and some police officers disagree that can be a valid administrative order at all from any valid public office?
In case not everybody knows how the police system works in the United States, it means the possible complete shootout among police officers which may lead to a nationwide shootout. No police officer can be excluded. On this matter, there is no conflict at all among any Federal laws, state laws or city laws in the entire United States.
If one police officer willing to execute the administrative order to kill a no-firearm-civilian on a U.S. street, another police officer who is enforcing U.S. laws has to open fire at the killer-police, both will call out to their supporting police officers for help, the situation will be, I use Boston as a local street's city to demonstrate here: if all Boston police officers have called in but can't make the situation clear, nearby cities police officers will be called together with Massachusetts state-police officers, further will be Connecticut's and New Hampshire's, etc, till the situation is clear.
As a lot would assume, I will be the one killed anyway in this process but it won't stop the shoot-out till the killer-police willing to be arrested. And I am comfortable I possibly will be able to escape the shooting 100% by my own help miraculously once the shooting started.
So, exactly, what I am trying to illustrate here?
----July 25th, 2018
07-24-2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the NO FOOD threatening situation.
My response: I also heard the argument about how government agencies coordinate their jobs together. As I said, I am quiet because it is obvious that I am already protected by laws.
----July 24th, 2018
07-23-2018 How many more confusions are still out there? （现在还有多少困扰没弄清啊？）
Heard a lot of people saying I am quiet now means I am done which is an untrue statement.（有人说我现在没声是不是差不多了, 我说当然不是了）
My response:（我的回应：）
I refuse all these demands for my money. （我拒绝所有这些向我索要钱财的要求。）
My gifting is voluntary to who I call relatives, never debt owed to Fang's any offspring. If the six relatives families, which are families of my father's two sisters and one brother, my grandfather one sister and one brother, dislike the gifting size, I am willing to cancel the gifting entirely to convince everyone that I never owe. I withhold the gift to my younger brother because he seems never a relative to me nor my parents. I refuse to gift anyone else. I consider futher request on this matter as extortion.（送礼物是自愿给被我称为亲戚的几个，从来不是因为欠了方家后人的钱债.。2004年我愿意送礼的六家+1家被我称为亲戚的人家，也就是我父亲的一弟两妹家里，我爷爷的一弟一妹家里，以及我奶奶的娘家兄弟家里，如果这些人认为我送的礼物规模不满意，我愿意将送礼物计划全部取消以平息所有人的不平衡并证明我方敏确实从来没有欠债必须要还的情况。所有就此的动作多多我都认为是在试图敲诈勒索。我暂时不会送给我弟弟任何礼物就因为他好像从来就不是我或者我父母的一个亲戚，我也拒绝送礼物给任何其他人。）
Not really I am done but it is obvious that I have been protected by laws is the reason I am quiet now.（不是因为我差不多了而是已经很明显我是被法律保护着，所以我没声了。）
I have announced four big company that two of which have been clarified that their paid-out money is lawfully for my exclusive usage. The current one is in the processing of clarifying what the confusions are that having doubts if the paid-out from this company should be for my exclusive usage. I haven't received the providing-payment from the clarified two companies is because the huge radio campaign of "taking the money out of Min Fang's possession to the truly deserved even if it means illegally" since 2013 has been the co-efforts from this currently in-clarification-confusions' group who may have also impacted my life severely. The other efforts are from the "what intellectual income should be" confusion.（我宣布过有4个公司为我支付生活费用，其中两个公司的支付款项已经得到澄清确实是合法提供给我方敏一个人使用的，现在进行的是有关第三家公司支付款项困扰的澄清。我现在还未收到前面两家公司的支付款项就是因为从2013年起的广播剧“就算手段非法也要把钱从方敏那儿拿走交给够资格有钱的人”这么一个宣传就是很多围绕这家公司的困扰造成也造成了我日常生活的不安全感以及很多真实的不便。广播剧这个宣传制作努力的其他努力方则是因为“什么是智慧产权”的困扰。）
I heard this current confusion from Yu's families （于家）has been historical since my great-great-grandfather's family inheriting in 1910 or so. I heard Yu's family had a bank that denied a banknote of 70,000 Silver dollars deposit which was $70,000 U.S. dollar in 1910 when the exchange rate was 1Silver Dollar = $ 1 U.S. dollar. The reason for the denial given was it might be a forged banknote which was unlikely because this deposit banknote was given to the banker Yu's own close in-law as part of the son's share from my great-great-grandfather's family-wealth inheriting, all other bank deposit notes from my deceased great-great-grandfather to all his adult sons and all his wives were good, all his junior sons' trusts were all good as well. This son's share and the average family inheriting size were both 100,000 Silver Dollars each and this son's blood was never doubted. Each son's share was decided by the father. I heard this was not the only story rumored about this bank operated by Yu's family since 1910. This story does remind me of what was announced on this radio program about an NYC bank branch's functions. This son's son burned my grandfather's house once because of the confusion if it was my great-grandfather forged his father's banknote which was untrue. The Trust my grandfather set up in 1948 was $500 Silver Dollars.（我听说现在这个于家的困扰好像有历史了，从我曽曾祖父那代分家产就有。我听说1910年左右有个开银行的于家拒绝兑现我曽曾祖父一个儿子的一张七万大洋的银票，这张1910年7万大洋的银票就是美国1910年时期的七万美元， 据说给的理由是银票可能是假的，我估计不太可能因为这张是这个儿子所分家产的一部分，这张于家银行的银票就是给这个于家银行老板的姻亲的，关系很近，我曽曾祖父给他所有成年儿子及所有老婆的其他银票都是好的，给所有年幼儿子们办的信托也都没问题。那一代每一个儿子的平均份额是十万大洋，这个儿子分到的就是十万大洋而且这个儿子的血脉也从未被做父亲的怀疑过。每个儿子的份额多少都是由做父亲的决定。我听说从这1910年起这于家银行还有一些类似的故事。这还真让我想起了广播剧上所宣布的纽约城里的一个银行分行的职责应该是什么。就是这家的儿子还是孙子把我爷爷的房子给烧过一次，就是因为他们家怀疑是我曾祖父篡改了那张银票。 我曾祖父从未碰过那张银票。我爷爷1948年设立的信托是500万大洋的信托。）
The confusion from this Yu's family with my inherited seems because of my great-grandmother's last name had the same pronunciation Chinese character of Yu as well. We are definitely not related.（据说现在于家对我继承的困扰就是因为我曾祖母娘家姓氏也是于姓的同音字，但我们之间肯定没有亲戚关系。）
----July 23rd, 2018
The expansion of the new system did not lead to the extinction of the old: the growth of deposit-taking, combined with less stringent capital requirements, convinced many state bankers that they could do without either the ability to issue banknotes or a federal charter, and led to a resurgence of state banking in the 1880s and 1890s. Under the original acts, the minimum capital requirement for national banks was $50,000 for banks in towns with a population of 6000 or less, $100,000 for banks in cities with a population ranging from 6000 to 50,000, and $200,000 for banks in cities with populations exceeding 50,000. By contrast, the minimum capital requirement for a state bank was often as low as $10,000. The difference in capital requirements may have been an important difference in the resurgence of state banking: in 1877 only about one-fifth of state banks had a capital of less than $50,000; by 1899 the proportion was over three-fifths. Recognizing this competition, the Gold Standard Act of 1900 reduced the minimum capital necessary for national banks.
(这一段是说1900年左右在人口6000以下的城市开一家银行只需要5万美金的现金储备，如果是6000到5万人口的城市就需要10万美金的储备金）
(US Banking History, Civil War to World War II. Source: https://eh.net/encyclopedia/us-banking-history-civil-war-to-world-war-ii/)
还有， 一些华裔认为就是不明白为什么那是我的钱，我只能说我没有任何责任义务解释也没有需要必须让谁谁明白，我的钱财只要合法就不关任何人的事。(Also, some Chinese kept on saying they do not understand why that is my money. I have to say it is not my obligation nor my responsibility to do the explanation. I don't have such need that I have to let be understood. As long as my money is lawfully my money, it is none of anyone else's business.)
方家后人可以考虑查询司法界人士及律师究竟什么才是方家后人他们自己的合法权益，甚至可以考虑设立或者模拟设立一份信托来了解什么是信托继承。如果是方家后人的法律权益，就应该可以查询到究竟是什么法律权益以及究竟由哪条法律条款所赋予或者所保障，所以请方家亲戚自己查询自己的合法权益究竟是什么之后，以及方家亲眷的合法权益究竟有没有被方敏所侵占之后，方家亲眷自然可以决定如何处理。我方敏确实不愿意被骚扰，我方敏确实没有拿方家亲眷的钱财，我方敏确实没有欠方家亲眷钱财，我方敏希望方家亲眷可以在确定我方敏没有侵占方家亲眷法律权益之后， 在方家亲眷情绪平静愿意尊重我方敏的合法权益之后，如有需要再联络我方敏。（Fang's offspring can consider consulting legal or justice professionals about exactly what their lawful rights & interests are, or to consider to set up a Trust entity or simulate to set up one to know exactly what Trust-Inheriting is. If there are indeed some Fang's offspring's lawful right & interest, then exactly by which law item granted or to protect should be able to be confirmed by legal professional's help, I ask Fang's relatives to please consult all these out themselves and to make their own decisions accordingly afterward. I never took any Fang's offspring's any money, nor owe them any money. I am not comfortable to be harassed. I wish Fang's relatives to decide if they want to contact me after they have confirmed their own lawful right& interests have not been impacted by my inheriting, and comfortable enough as well to respect my lawful rights & interests.)
方家每代都是在父辈去世时分家产，由继承人继承门户，其他后人则自立门户。只要你家是方家血脉，你家前辈就应该在其父辈去世分家自立门户时分到过方家的家产。如果你家从没分过方家的家产，你家从来就不是方家血脉。我爷爷兄妹是在1930年我曾祖父去世时分的家，我父亲兄妹是在1965年我爷爷去世时分的家，我相信我父亲目前是失踪。我于2004年继承我爷爷所设立信托继承我爷爷这支的方家。（Family inheriting in Fang's house happened when each generation's father passed away. If your family are Fang's offspring, your family should already have experienced the family inheriting when your family became an independent house while my grandfather inherited the deceased father's house as the heir. if your family never inherited anything from Fang's house, that is because you are never the Fang's offspring. My grandfather's siblings had family inheriting in 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away, my father's siblings had family inheriting in 1965 when my grandfather passed away. I believe my father currently is missing. I inherited my grandfather's house in 2004 after my Trust-Inheriting.)
----published on 2018年7月20日
07-22-2018 Missy O, you are a cheap-born yourself to watch your husband to father other woman's children.
Heard this morning's talk about so not allowed.
My response:
Pretty much everything is not allowed. "Not allowed to have food", "Not allowed to have a roof", "Not allowed to talk", "not allowed to have children", "Not allowed to have parents still alive" from different over-outreaching groups but well-organized care-free insisted on. Over-outreaching groups mean none of these groups would be the group should have expected any impacted interests if allowed. I accused this is the murder-attempted by all the participants.
I had met some big names interesting but only one from each name. Why this can be so confusing after all these years, 14 years later to be exactly? Are they psychos?
Two example: One is Miss Jessica O's husband who might be a cousin of the person I met but both have the anxiety as if I am the one so confused, or he is the same person but he had already moved on before my birth children were conceived which means he never donated his bio to have my biological children to be born.
The entire time, I have been trying to tell this Miss O if her child was born in the same 2010 as my children, my children won't be the children sharing the blood because O's name is never cheap, she just insisted on she is a cheap-born enough to be so confused. So I used her insisted-on as today's title.
I have made it very clear my daughter presented in a video in 2012 resembles me. If Miss O has been a wife to her husband this entire time, how come she never knew she is this cheap to watch her husband kept having children with others? I was never this cheap to need his money to raise none of his bio children.
So, I really want to ask this Miss O, have you participated in some too wild parties to be confused this much to mistake every JoyStick a husband to yourself? If you are this cheap as yourself demonstrated so publicly, why you fancy you can forbid me to acknowledge my biological children are so realistic children to deserve to live their life proudly? I am so proud to tell you I am much wealthy than your husband to provide for my biological children.
07-22-2018 Missy O, you are a cheap-born yourself to watch your husband to father other woman's children. Otherwise, you should realize you only have one husband instead of claiming every boy who has a joyful stick a husband.
I am so proud to tell Miss O that I am so much wealthier than your husband to provide much handsomely for my biological children.
The other one is a Mister D. R. who I never met but somehow so confused why I so stuck with him.
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with them?
I heard D.R's family had invested some movies and shows I wanted to invest in 2004, but the intellectual income I earned in front of so many people was the expense before the company tax which was nothing to do with him. I heard he is the person kept telling everybody I have no money, why it is him if he was there heard everything I wanted was answered by the none Rockefellers, nor Fords, and nor Waltons, except those investment opportunities his family so willing to grab the chance to invest? Is the Missy O couple the same story?
The intellectual Income has nothing to do with the investment profit that they have already received. The intellectual income is paid as the administrative expenses but calculated as the percentage of the sales which is similar to the salesperson's incentive.
* I can sense there are some Chinese female psychos competing who kept claiming every JoyStick from the F house is the JoyStick for them to handle. I don't know if they are from the prostituting pimping efforts.
----July 22nd, 2018
07-21-2018 Why Chinese Communities have this Anger Outburst?（华裔社区爆发的愤怒究竟是什么？）
Heard this morning's talk of Chinese communities outburst yesterday.（听说了今天早上华裔社区对我昨天博文的愤怒）
My response:（我的回应：）
Why? Who deserves what saying? Laws printed in Chinese, in English, in French, In Spanish for them to check out, why they only demand mouth-privilege for the saying? Who expects what saying from what opening located at where on a human body if laws-in-prints are not what expected to provide the saying? (为什么？谁应该有个什么说法？可查询的已经发表的已实施法律，既有用中文发表的，也有用英文法文西班牙文发表的，为什么不查询这些已发表已实施法律而强调这张嘴那张嘴才能给个说法？如果已发表法律的说法不是所期望的，那人体哪个部分的什么开口部位才是所应该期望的给个说法的权威？）
Use this "Not allowed to talk, not allowed to have a roof, not allowed to have food" tone to disagree with my accusation against the Chinese government is never the privilege granted by the Constitution to any government officials not to mention these government employees who possibly intentionally seeking jobs in Boston after my inheriting in 2004. (用这种”不准说话，不准有屋住，不准有饭吃“的口气来表达对我指责中国政府的态度，从来就不是美国宪法赋予美国政府官员的特权，更不用说他们就只是在政府机关找了份工作的替政府做工的雇员而已，我还怀疑他们是不是在我2004年继承之后特意在麻州波士顿政府部门找这份工来伺机做他们现在表态铁了心就是要做的事？他们都是姓于的，这是偶然吗？）
As you heard so loudly, the Intellectual incomes should be recognized as the reward to those what located between human legs is the reason there is actually so many confusion how could an intellectual-maker deserve the intellectual-making while so many paired-openings so want it?（就像你所听到的响亮宣言，智慧产权应该被认为是奖励人体两腿中间部位的功能的，所以才会有这么多的奇怪声音来强调明明有这么多已经对接在一起的人体想要钱，凭什么让智慧产权的创造者拿智慧收入？
Are all these outbursts the same?（这些华裔社区的愤怒也是一类吗？）
My anger regarding Chinese communities, especially Boston Chinese community, is that they are so certain that I never get a penny from this or that prominent JoyStick because I was homeless and am currently on welfare. All you could hear from the Chinese communities is the anger from the pride as if themselves are the authentic sucker expected to have money instead of being the none of their business group. Otherwise, why Chinese attitudes or Chinese determinations are needed when there are existing government's regulations or the U.S. laws to handle my welfare case? Especially when none of these state-government employees from the Boston Chinese community is my welfare caseworker.（我对于华裔社区特别是波士顿华裔社区的愤怒就是：他们很清楚我曾经是流落街头现在靠政府综援生活，从没从这条那条男人乐呵棍拿一分钱。而你们可以听到的华裔社区那份因骄傲而产生的愤怒就好像他们才是真正舔到了这条那条男人乐呵棍的够资格拿钱的人物，而不是这和他们有什么关系这么一族。否则的话，明明美国政府机关已经有完善法规条例管理综援的情况下，哪里会需要这份华裔态度，华裔决心？何况，这些波士顿华裔人士根本就不是我的什么综援申请审批相关人士。）
I am already in communication with the Massachusetts and Boston government agencies about my welfare case as what I suppose to do according to the U.S. laws. According to I hear, everyone whose wealth under-entrust is expected the same as I am experiencing: I am constantly facing the eviction anxiety, monthly providing-check recipients have the anxiety of what if no check comes-in next month? So, I screamed at my apartment I need $6Million cash in my backpack to be anxiety free for 50 years.（我已经根据美国法律做了我应该做的，也就是和麻州及波士顿的政府相关机构就我的综援进行沟通查询。我听说啊，每一个办了财产信托的人都会有我这份体会：我是天天担心被赶出综援系统，每月拿生活费支票的那种就天天担心下个月支票没来怎么办？所以，我是急得在我家里乱吼：我要六百万美元现金放在随身包里，这样我就可以50年不用担惊受怕。）
Why in my backpack? That is because I have another anxiety of "Heavens above, Hells underneath, The proud Chinese communities are in-between." The explanation: If I dare to have a house or a bank account, air strikes should be expected from above, landmines and tunnels underneath, the proud Chinese communities are all around to break-in. So, I analyzed to conclude my high-tech security should be what I rely on to protect my life and my $6Million cash.（为什么放在随身包里？那是因为我还有另外一个担惊处：“上有天堂，下有地狱，中间有个到处遍地都是的华裔社区”。解读：要是我敢有个房子或者银行存款，那是上有飞机和飞箭，下有地雷和地道，中间还有个华裔社区随时破门而入。所以我分析了一下，我依赖高科技保安能保障我的人生安全，也就同时顺带保障了我的六百万美金现款了。）
I heard there is a child mothered by a Vietnamese is announced this morning which is certainly none of my business. My biological children, definitely not fathered by the same person, are already in elementary school. I have missed their lovely toddler years is true.（我听说今天早上又宣布一个越南人所生的孩儿，又是个很肯定和我的亲生孩子们不是一个爹的宣布，所以又是个与我无关人的无关事。我自己亲生的孩子们都已经“七岁八岁狗都嫌”的上小学了。我错过了他们可爱的幼稚园时期是真的很遗憾。）
----July 21st of 2018
还有， 一些华裔认为就是不明白为什么那是我的钱，我只能说我没有任何责任义务解释也没有需要必须让谁谁明白，我的钱财只要合法就不关任何人的事。(Also, some Chinese kept on saying they do not understand why that is my money. I have to say it is not my obligation nor my responsibility to do the explanation. I don't have such need that I have to let be understood. As long as my money is lawfully my money, it is none of anyone else's business.)
方家后人可以考虑查询司法界人士及律师究竟什么才是方家后人他们自己的合法权益，甚至可以考虑设立或者模拟设立一份信托来了解什么是信托继承。如果是方家后人的法律权益，就应该可以查询到究竟是什么法律权益以及究竟由哪条法律条款所赋予或者所保障，所以请方家亲戚自己查询自己的合法权益究竟是什么之后，以及方家亲眷的合法权益究竟有没有被方敏所侵占之后，方家亲眷自然可以决定如何处理。我方敏确实不愿意被骚扰，我方敏确实没有拿方家亲眷的钱财，我方敏确实没有欠方家亲眷钱财，我方敏希望方家亲眷可以在确定我方敏没有侵占方家亲眷法律权益之后， 在方家亲眷情绪平静愿意尊重我方敏的合法权益之后，如有需要再联络我方敏。（Fang's offspring can consider consulting legal or justice professionals about exactly what their lawful rights & interests are, or to consider to set up a Trust entity or simulate to set up one to know exactly what Trust-Inheriting is. If there are indeed some Fang's offspring's lawful right & interest, then exactly by which law item granted or to protect should be able to be confirmed by legal professional's help, I ask Fang's relatives to please consult all these out themselves and to make their own decisions accordingly afterward. I never took any Fang's offspring's any money, nor owe them any money. I am not comfortable to be harassed. I wish Fang's relatives to decide if they want to contact me after they have confirmed their own lawful right& interests have not been impacted by my inheriting, and comfortable enough as well to respect my lawful rights & interests.)
方家每代都是在父辈去世时分家产，由继承人继承门户，其他后人则自立门户。只要你家是方家血脉，你家前辈就应该在其父辈去世分家自立门户时分到过方家的家产。如果你家从没分过方家的家产，你家从来就不是方家血脉。我爷爷兄妹是在1930年我曾祖父去世时分的家，我父亲兄妹是在1965年我爷爷去世时分的家，我相信我父亲目前是失踪。我于2004年继承我爷爷所设立信托继承我爷爷这支的方家。（Family inheriting in Fang's house happened when each generation's father passed away. If your family are Fang's offspring, your family should already have experienced the family inheriting when your family became an independent house while my grandfather inherited the deceased father's house as the heir. if your family never inherited anything from Fang's house, that is because you are never the Fang's offspring. My grandfather's siblings had family inheriting in 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away, my father's siblings had family inheriting in 1965 when my grandfather passed away. I believe my father currently is missing. I inherited my grandfather's house in 2004 after my Trust-Inheriting.)
----published on 2018年7月20日
07-20-2018 方家亲眷的愤怒 “究竟是想送礼还是在演戏？”( The anger of "This is gifting or
performing?")
听说了今天早上方家亲眷的愤怒。(Heard about this morning's anger expressed)
我的回应：(My response:)
我不是拖延送礼，拖延是因为我就是拿不到信托已支付的生活费用给付及我全部的智慧产权收入，身无分文无法送礼。香港信托的五亿美金投资本应在2014年底到期，也因2015年我的生活费用给付拿不到及美国纷传的“洗钱传闻”而由香港信托进行了投资延期的处理，听说目前这笔钱已被交给美国司法部。(I did not intend to delay the gifting, the delay was because I can't receive my living expense providing and all my intellectual income, I have been penniless. I heard the $500Million investment from Hong Kong was due by end of 2014, its investment was extended by the Hong Kong Trust entity because of the circled "money laundry" rumor and I can't receive my living expense provided. I heard it is currently in withheld by the U.S. Justice Department.)
目前我已经向美国警方投诉中国政府，洛家和高尔家通过广播剧及其相关活动进行公然讹诈，敲诈，抢劫和绑架活动。我不清楚事件真相如何。(I have filed the complaint to the U.S. law enforcement my accusation that Chinese government, R's families, and Gore's families have used radio program producing and promotion activities to conduct bilking, extortion, robbery, and kidnapping, etc. I do not the truth of what happened.)
我目前听说的是中国政府为了协助一些人的要钱要求，2015年起由中国政府外交部协助组织参与并由中国文化部宣传部及华裔社区进行“方敏不答应给钱就通过广播剧组织活动进行谩骂羞辱并不准方敏花钱”的所谓真人实景的演出活动。(What I heard was in order to assist demanding money, the Chinese government's foreign department facilitated, organized and participated in the performing show activities from the Chinese Culture Department and Propaganda Department and the Chinese communities abroad, the theme of this reality people in reality set performing show has been "Min Fang is not allowed not to hand in the money. Min Fang is not allowed to spend a penny and deserved to be abused is she dare not to hand in the money".)
波士顿华裔在确定知道按照美国法律我会有丰厚广播剧收入的情况下，坚决以他们就是在乎麻州政府现在付出的是麻州纳税人的钱为名吵闹骂砸就是"不准"麻州政府机构向我财务施援也已经被我向麻州政府投诉其可能的非法企图。(Knowing for certain I should have very handsome income from the radio program broadcasting according to the U.S. laws, some Boston Chinese insisted on to watch taxpayer's money on their same equal government employee-colleagues' behave to ensure I am not allowed to be helped by the reaching-out from the government agencies as the determination you heard the day before on the radio. I have filed my complaint to the Massachusetts State government regarding this.)
广播剧收入是在2016年由广播公司支付后被洛克菲勒家的女眷亲友非法提领。目前听说其中大部分的钱也已经在美国司法部。(My income from the radio program broadcasting was paid in 2016 but illegally deposited by several females from the R's family or related. I heard most of the amount has been overseeing by the U.S. Justice Department.)
美国的O家和其他一些人士就我的信托在美国所投资公司的所有权有些困绕是造成由这些公司所支付的我的生活费用给付被拖延的原因。听说我2015年2016年的生活费用给付是否合法已经澄清，其中通过联邦政府支付的部分也已经转入我的私人账户但还没有转入我自己在商业银行的账户，我也已向麻州政府查询我的信托通过麻州及波士顿向我支付的生活费用给付。(American O' families and others have been confused about the ownership of some American companies that my Trust entities have been investing. This delayed the pay-out of my living expenses because of the concern if the paid-out money is legal. I heard both 2015 and 2016 paid-out have been clarified as legal, those transmitted via Federal agency has been transferred to my name but not a commercial bank I have access to yet. I also started my inquiry to Massachusetts and Boston about the paid-out to local government agencies.)
我很理解方家亲眷的愤怒，我也只能说我收到钱就会尽快处理礼物事宜，我相信会很快。我本人目前的处境还是在被由中国政府组织进行的严密跟梢之中。 传言是中国政府坚持那些想要钱的人就必须做我的邻居甚至要求由我付费以免费居住以方便监视我的一言一行，我也已经表态坚决拒绝此类无理要求。估计由美国波士顿房管局华裔协助安排，不清楚这些华裔认识是否有听说美国由民事法庭可以进行财产继承权官司，不知这些所谓华裔优秀人才是否听说过没有法庭申诉依据又无要求司法调查的理由已经说明要钱从来不是这些人的合法权利？我甚至不清楚这些所谓的优秀华裔是否因为看不懂英文版本的美国法律是让他们如此困扰什么才是美国法律所赋予所保障的合法权益的原因。(I can imagine the anger but all I can say is I will take care of the gifting ASAP once I can receive the money. My current situation is I am still being stalked closely by those money-wanters possibly organized by the Chinese government. The rumor is the Chinese government insist on to let those who want some money to be my neighbor to live free and to "provide closed Residential surveillance" over me, I have refused this demand. I assume it is helped by some Chinese employed by the housing authority/ I don't know if these excellent government employees from Boston Chinese community have ever heard of demanding money is never lawful if there is no legal ground to file a civil lawsuit for the ownership of the money nor legal ground to request a criminal investigation if I steal money? I don't know if these so excellent government employees from the Boston Chinese community can read U.S. laws printed in English to know what are the lawful rights granted and protected by the U.S. laws? How can they be so confused what means lawful in the United States just because they were from China?)
还有啊，我听说广播剧已经造成一百多人的智慧产权在当事人不知情的情况下被非法提领是今天早上广播剧播出希望知情者向美国警方投诉的原因。(Also, I heard radio program has made over 100 in the dark victims of illegal transmitting the intellectual incomes. This is possibly the reason of this morning's broadcasting of "please tip the law enforcement.")
如果你本人或者你的朋友在参加了一个成功的研究项目之后，却没有任何智慧产权收入，也没人知道是什么原因造成。你可以自己或者替你的朋友向美国警方（应该是联邦调查局）陈述你所知道的，只要你说明白你不清楚你所投诉的是否是智慧产权最后评估的结果还是因为非法活动造成，你就不用担心是否会说错话。(If you or your friend had participated a successful project but did not receive any paying-out already intellectual incomes, you can tip the law enforcement about what you. I don't think if this will be an issue as long as you make it clear that you are not certain if the situation is the result of the final evaluation or illegal activities.)
还有， 一些华裔认为就是不明白为什么那是我的钱，我只能说我没有任何责任义务解释也没有需要必须让谁谁明白，我的钱财只要合法就不关任何人的事。(Also, some Chinese kept on saying they do not understand why that is my money. I have to say it is not my obligation nor my responsibility to do the explanation. I don't have such need that I have to let be understood. As long as my money is lawfully my money, it is none of anyone else's business.)
方家后人可以考虑查询司法界人士及律师究竟什么才是方家后人他们自己的合法权益，甚至可以考虑设立或者模拟设立一份信托来了解什么是信托继承。如果是方家后人的法律权益，就应该可以查询到究竟是什么法律权益以及究竟由哪条法律条款所赋予或者所保障，所以请方家亲戚自己查询自己的合法权益究竟是什么之后，以及方家亲眷的合法权益究竟有没有被方敏所侵占之后，方家亲眷自然可以决定如何处理。我方敏确实不愿意被骚扰，我方敏确实没有拿方家亲眷的钱财，我方敏确实没有欠方家亲眷钱财，我方敏希望方家亲眷可以在确定我方敏没有侵占方家亲眷法律权益之后， 在方家亲眷情绪平静愿意尊重我方敏的合法权益之后，如有需要再联络我方敏。（Fang's offspring can consider to consult legal or justice professionals about exactly what their lawful rights & interests are, or to consider to set up a Trust entity or simulate to set up one to know exactly what Trust-Inheriting is. If there are indeed some Fang's offspring's lawful right & interest, then exactly by which law item granted or to protect should be able to be confirmed by legal professional's help, I ask Fang's relatives to please consult all these out themselves and to make their own decisions accordingly afterward. I never took any Fang's offspring's any money, nor owe them any money. I am not comfortable to be harassed. I wish Fang's relatives to decide if they want to contact me after they have confirmed their own lawful right& interests have not been impacted by my inheriting, and comfortable enough as well to respect my lawful rights & interests.)
方家每代都是在父辈去世时分家产，由继承人继承门户，其他后人则自立门户。只要你家是方家血脉，你家前辈就应该在其父辈去世分家自立门户时分到过方家的家产。如果你家从没分过方家的家产，你家从来就不是方家血脉。我爷爷兄妹是在1930年我曾祖父去世时分的家，我父亲兄妹是在1965年我爷爷去世时分的家，我相信我父亲目前是失踪。我于2004年继承我爷爷所设立信托继承我爷爷这支的方家。（Family inheriting in Fang's house happened when each generation's father passed away. If your family are Fang's offspring, your family should already have experienced the family inheriting when your family became an independent house while my grandfather inherited the deceased father's house as the heir. if your family never inherited anything from Fang's house, that is because you are never the Fang's offspring. My grandfather's siblings had family inheriting in 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away, my father's siblings had family inheriting in 1965 when my grandfather passed away. I believe my father currently is missing. I inherited my grandfather's house in 2004 after my Trust-Inheriting.)
----2018年7月20日
07-19-2018 What are these females squeaking about?（今天早上这些女人都在叽叽哇哇些什么？）
Family inheriting (分家产）:
After family inheriting, the brothers and sisters are no longer in the same house. The heir owns the father's house.
（分过家产后，兄弟姊妹就不再是一家了，做父亲这支的家由继承人所拥有，这就是继承人的定义。）
In my family, each generation had family inheriting. My father's generation's family inheriting was in 1965 after my grandfather passed away. My father didn't inherit anything from my grandfather, I am the person who heads my grandfather's house after my 2004's inheriting of the Trust entity my grandfather set up for me.
（我们家每代都有分家产。我父亲这一代分家产是在1965年我爷爷去世时。我父亲没有继承到我爷爷的任何东西，我2004年继承了我爷爷替我设立的信托后就继承了我爷爷这支的方家。）
----July 19th, 2018
Heard about this morning's loud squeaking from so many agitated females.（听说了今天早上的一边女人吱哇嘈杂声）
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard Shanghai females are the group squeaking their butts and breasts truly know it is impossible that I have any inheriting.
I have to say I myself have womanly butts and breasts, and I am really rich enough to be disgusted by even envision their husbands' leftover-butts, so it is permanently that I won't give a penny to any female's breasts nor any female's butts.
（我听说那些说她们自己的奶子屁股最清楚我就没可能有钱的是一群上海女人。我只好说我自己是个女人，也有女人的奶子屁股呀，我有钱当然就认为他们那些丈夫的剩饭似的屁股真是想想都噁心啦。所以我是永远都不会付一分钱给女人屁股或是女人奶子。）
I heard Beijing females are the group insist on their males' Joy-Sticks truly know the Chinese history and global culture vertically across the time-space of the history and horizontally across the geographic space of the globe earth, and that's how their males became the Chinese national leaders' union.
I have to say this is the embarrassment to the Chinese college education that my three generations grandfathers had supported to establish.
（我听说是一群北京女人在坚持说他们男人的乐呵棍子才是真实的纵贯了然了中国的历史和横跨熟悉了全球的文化，他们的男人都已经乐呵成了中国国家领导人联合体啦。我只好说这是我三代爷爷们曾经捐款支持建立的中国高等教育的失败。）
I heard American females are the group very confident that the U.S. law enforcement won't do anything beyond bow to their middle achievement.
I have to say this is not what I can say anything about other than I am definitely protected by the U.S. law enforcement who are beyond the middle.
(我听说美国女人很自信的是她们的中段成就是可以让美国的执法人员见了就只会鞠躬的。我只好说除了我相信自己确实是被一些没为她们的中段成就鞠躬的美国执法人员保护着之外，这还真不是我可以评论的一份自信。）
----July 19th, 2018
Heard my great-grandmother's maiden name was not Yu（于）（听说了我曾祖母娘家不姓于）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I don't my great-grandmother's name is true, but I won't acknowledge that her last name is the one broadcasted this morning, because the substituting game is still on this radio program producing efforts. I am not willing to acknowledge whoever should be called my great-grandmother.
（我不清楚我曾祖母娘家姓氏是真的，但我不会认今天播出的就是我曾祖母娘家姓氏。广播剧上的的替换游戏还在进行，我不会随便就认谁是我的曾祖母。）
The normal substituting routine has been: Change the great-grandmother's maiden name first, then broadcasting the couple's grandchild who is fathered by a person whose name has the same Chinese characters of my father's name, to serve the purpose to broadcast this grandchild should be the real owner of the money I inherited.
（替换游戏通常的做法是：再换了曾祖母的姓氏，在广而告之这一对夫妻有个由和我父亲同名的儿子所生的孙子，这孙子才应该是我所继承财产的真正主人。）
----July 19th, 2018
07-18-2018 My father and I never heard of the $10,000 per month providing before this April of 2018.（我和我父亲在2018年4月前就从未听说过这每月一万美金的给付。）
Heard there is confusion about how would I don't care $10,000 per month for 29 years as I expressed on this blog if that is my living expenses paid-out.(t听说了疑问：“如果是我的钱，我怎么会不在乎每月1万美金被人给拿走了29年？”）
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard this was based on the impressed assumption that my parents and I all were willing let others take the money totaled about $3.5Million for over 29 years time when I was in China.
This assumption is an untrue statement.
（我听说有着疑问的原因是大众似乎认为我和我父母是自愿让别人把总共大约350万美金的钱就这么拿走29年的。大众的这种印象是错误的。）
The real reason was I never heard of this $10,000 until a couple of weeks before the public audience since April of 2018. I heard recently that my father was asked if he needed some money but he understood that was the charity help to the Private Assistant's own money. My parents and I had lived in Nanjing which was 4-6 hours train time from Shanghai where the money was sent and went disappeared, so we never heard of this monthly living expenses providing.
（真实的原因是我从未听说过有这么一笔每月1万美元的生活费用给付，我是在广播剧2018年4月开始播出1万美金故事的前一两个星期才听说的。我最近听说我父亲曾经被我爷爷的私人助理问过需不需要一点钱，我父亲当时以为我爷爷的私人助理是想用他自己的钱接济接济我父亲。我和我的父母是在南京生活，这每月的1万美金当时是被送到上海后就彻底在上海失踪了，所以我们一家在南京就从来没听说过有这么一个每月生活费给付。）
Remembered the fight for a dress between my father and mother of the "firstborn daughter", and the "Beijing ex-romance", I heard the "Beijing ex-romance" had received 100 per month possibly was the reason of the dress-fight which pissed-off my father who had no clue why he was not allowed to use his own salary money to buy a dress for his own daughter.
（还记得那个为一条女孩裙子吵了一架多出了一个“真正头胎女儿”，还有那个”北京前女友“吗？我听说那个“北京前女友”每个月有收到100美金是引发吵架的原因，这架吵得我父亲当时是某明奇妙还气到半死，就是不明白他为什么就不可以用他自己的工资钱替他自己的女儿买条裙子。）
The piss me off talks about the "real true love" about how my mother and I were never loved by my father was because of the understanding that my father seems "refused" to let his marriage family have any money other than his shabby salary.
（还有那个把我气得半死的“真正最爱”说法，也就是我妈和我从来就不是我父亲所爱，就是因为“出于很理解”我父亲一定是宁愿把钱送人，也绝不肯让我和我妈可以过上比他自己微薄的工资所可以提供的好一点的生活。）
My blog truthfully reflects how I feel when I heard of this $10,000 per month almost at the same time with the public audience since April of 2018. I heard this is the American company invested by an 1100 years old Trust entity that I inherited without any clue in 2004, this is the American company paid-out $400Million medical and $400Million living expenses in October of 2016 according to the instruction. This American Fund company is a Ford Holding's investor.
（我的博文所写是我2018年4月左右听说这每月1万美元故事后的真实想法。我听说这家美国公司是由1100年前的一个爷爷所设立的信托所投资的，我是在从未听说过这个信托的情况下在2004年继承了这个信托。就是这家美国公司2016年为我的4亿美金医疗4亿美金和4亿美金生活费用按上级公司指示开具支票的。这家美国公司是福特控股的一家投资基金公司。）
None of my father's sibling was born before 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away so that none of them had a name given by my grandfather yet. The Trust entity set up by my grandfather was in 1948 and he passed away in 1965. My grandfather never updated his settler's letter.
(我的曾祖父是在1930年去世的，我父亲及他的弟妹还没有出生也都还没被我爷爷起个名字。我爷爷设立信托是在1948年，我爷爷是在1965年去世的。我爷爷至死都从未更改过他的信托委托书。）
I refuse my money to be paid out against my with from this company, and I refuse to give out any of my shares of investment in this company.
（我拒绝这家公司违反我的意愿给出我的钱，我也拒绝让出我在这家公司的任何投资份额。)
I refuse any Extortion-alike "you just have to give the money" demand to be forwarded by any company or any individual.
（我拒绝任何个人或者任何公司向我转达类似敲诈的不给就是不行的要钱要求。）
This American Fund company is 100% privately legally owned by its British Investor Fund company.
（这家美国基金公司是100%由其上级英国投资基金公司全额合法拥有。）
I heard "We don‘t have to be your money" was said by some investments of this American fund company, so I am asking is this saying means the person's own intention to illegally own this money this person self if this person implying don't have to charity this money to me?
(我听说”我们又不需要非把这钱归你所有“是由这家美国公司所投资的一些企业的某些人说的。那我就问说这话的这些人是在说你们从来就不需要把这钱扔给我来施舍施舍我，那你们是在暗示你们自己是想非法把这钱归你们这些人自己所有吗？）
----July 18th, 2018
07-17-2018 Loud Victory announced by the Chinese:" No Russian ever has anything to with you is a certainty !!!"(t听说了今天早上华人向量的胜利之声：“俄国人和你一点关系都没有。”）
Heard this morning's so loud victory in this morning's broadcasting（听说了今天早上播出的胜利之音）.
My response: （我的回应：）
If you wonder what this morning's broadcasting is about that you can't pinpoint, and if you hear the replay you have recorded somehow, you probably can hear the emotion so loud and clear from the victory of the certainty: " No Russian ever has anything to with you is a real TRUTH !!!"（如果你在奇怪今天早上的播出究竟主题是什么好像很清晰但不确定是什么，如果你有早上播出内容的录音可以回放，你可能就能够挺高一份情绪是响亮又高昂：胜利是如此的确定：“俄国人和你从来就没有任何关系是一个真实是一个事实。”
What special industry considers this is an important victory? a new one called Politicians? for Diplomating aspects?（究竟会是什么特种行业认为这是如此重大的胜利？一种新兴的企业叫做政治j家？为了特别大写的“外交关心”？）
Some of this morning's announcements are from the People's Republic of China's Central Political Committee who certainly has the power to ensure it is broadcasted as they intended, U.S. police officers help is just a phone call away for any Chinese so privileged national leaders. Others a Chinese communities U.S. government officials. （今天早上有些宣布的内容就是中国中央政治局几个常委的原音宣布，他们可是有权有势就只要一个电话就可以要求美国的警察协助保障广播剧所播出的就是他们本人想公开宣布的。其他做宣布的还有一些是华裔美国政府官员。）
I personally take all these announcements are expressing "murder for money determined".(我个人认为今天早上所播出的根本就是”谋财害命宣言”。）
Why I say so? Well, if you live abroad, it is never a surprise, if not daily, to watch how Chinese consulates can be surrounded and yelled at: "You are the Mother-Fuckers, You are the whore-borns, and that is all who the fuck you are." And no one would hear any sound from the People's Republic of China's consulates no matter how huge the crowds might be and how loud is the yelling towards the People's Republic of China's Consulates. (我为什么这么认为？哎呦，你要是生活在国外，就知道有种现象就算不是每天看见，但也绝对不是什么稀罕事。 那就是中华人民共和国各大领事馆的外面有好大一堆人对着中华人民共和国的领事馆嘶吼：”你们就是一群会操亲妈的畜生杂种，你们就是一群婊子养的狗屎，你们就是他妈的这么一群东西。”不管这外面的人群有多么人山人海，或者骂声有多么响彻云霄，就从来没听过见过哪个中华人民共和国的领事馆会开门出来发点声。）
I just called them whores and prostitutes plus mother-fuckers as well as whore-borns. How huge can this be? Why the People's Republic of China's government needs to be so high profile to respond with such a loud determination of victory so confirmed? So I say, this is the broadcasting of murder for money intended.（我也就是痛骂他们是一群婊子一群妓院娼妓外加一群婊子养的畜生杂种及会操亲妈的狗屎而已。有什么了不起的？就这点痛骂哪里会需要中国政府如此高规格来做出胜利就是如此确定的响亮回应？所以我说这广播的播出其实是在宣布想要谋财害命而已。)
Regarding the Chinese community "representatives" of this morning's broadcasting, well, you would know what they are after you verified the broadcasted story of "Yesterday stole a mug in Walmart" story was a complete made up because that was the mug I took from my apartment when I left for Walmart. And I did not linger near the mug section at all when I was at Walmart. Everyone you heard who has the power to evict me from the "welfare system" for the caring of tax-payers' money should be powerful enough to ask to verify the story by watching the city-watch surveillance video owned by the government. (至于今天早上所播出的华裔代表，这么说吧，你核实过所播出的那个“昨天在沃尔玛偷杯子”的故事纯是人为编造，你就很清楚他们都是些什么东西了。昨天那个杯子就是我从自己家里带着出门去沃尔玛的，我在沃尔玛逗留时也根本就没在卖杯子的自助柜台逗留过。那些号称有本事也铁了心的可以把我从美国福利系统里给赶出去不准我占用纳税人的福利钱的，可都应该是有权有势可以要求查看市区警民联防的警方录影资料以核实昨天沃尔玛故事是否真实的。）
All the above is either what I heard or what I think. （以上所发布的要么是我听说的要么是我认为的。）
----July 17th, 2018
07-16-2018 My great-grandmother Yu was from a traditional polygamist family's sixth wife may be the reason of these Yu-s' ridiculousness (我的于姓曾祖母是第六房妻子所出可能是这些于姓人士如此岂有此理的原因）
Heard this morning's talk about my housing.（听说了今天早上所谈的我的房子事宜）
My response:（我的回应：）
I truly appreciate this is addressed. I am not certain if this is from the Boston Housing Authority or the law enforcement yet, but I did ask both to help on this matter is a true statement.（我很谢谢终于来处理这个问题了，但我还不太清楚这是波士顿廉租屋管理局还是警方所谈，我是向这两个地方寻求过帮助。）
----July 16th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my great-grandmother who was a Miss Yu(于) as well. (听说了今天早上谈到我的曾祖母也姓于。)
My response: (我的回应：）
I know my great-grandmother was the second wife to my polygamist great-grandfather and mother of all my great-grandfather's children. My great-grandfather's barren first wife was a fourth cousin to my great-grandmother by rumor. My family has always privileged the mother of the heir as the King Mother because of my family's Imperial family history and birthmark inheriting rule. (我知道我的曾祖母是我一妻多夫曾祖父的第二个妻子，也是我曾祖父所有孩子的母亲。我曾祖父的第一个妻子不生，好像也姓于，是我曾祖母的一个四等亲。因为我们家里的帝王家世背景以及胎记继承规则，我们家里继承人的生母一直都有着母后娘娘的待遇。）
My great-grandmother's father obviously raised her well because she was one of the rare females in her time who received the education. Her biggest proud might be it was her father-in-law, her husband and her first-born son who were acknowledged, by the Republic of China's government, as the three generations' biggest donors from the Fang's house who had supported the majority of the College education fund that Republic of China's Education Department needed to establish colleges to promote college education in China.（很显然我曾祖母的父亲对我曾祖母很好，让我曾祖母念过书成为她那个时代少有的受过教育的女性。我曾祖母最大的骄傲可能就是她的公公，她自己的丈夫，她自己的头胎儿子是中华民国政府所认可的方家三代捐款大户，三代所捐款项是当时中华民国教育部兴办大学推动中国大学教育所需款项的绝大部分。）
I heard my great-grandmother was from the sixth wife of her traditional polygamist father who did not have a birthmark inheriting rule though. When my great-grandmother's marriage was negotiated, her father-side relatives wanted to replace her with some Miss Yu-s from her father's this or that cousin's first wife, but my great-grandfather and her own father both insisted on she would be the bride. This issue had been Yu's families' shared issue after my great-grandparents' marriage when another Miss Yu married my great-grandfather's cousin. As you may be so impressed from what you heard on the radio and what rumored in reality, this is still a huge issue today that my great-grandmother was not born by a first wife from the Yu's family even after every wife in China is a first wife now.（我听说我的曾祖母是她传统一夫多妻父亲的第六房妻子所生，不过他们家可没有什么胎记继承规则。听说当年我的曾祖父母谈婚论嫁时，于家就一直想把我曾祖母给换成她父亲这个那个亲戚的大房老婆所生的孩子，是我的曾祖父及我曾祖母自己的父亲坚持我的曾祖母才是新娘。在我曾祖父母结婚后又有了一个于家的小姐嫁给我曾祖父的堂兄弟，这个陈年老纠结好像就成了于家共同的耿耿于怀。就像你现在在广播剧里以及在现实生活中的传言里所听到的一样，在如今中国所有的老婆都是大房老婆之后，我曾祖母不是于家的大房老婆所生还是所谓于家人最大的鄙视。）
A tip information: I heard it was after 1920 China's polygamist marriage became prostitutes and beggars' marriages only except the first wife's marriage, I heard it was the efforts from the Republic of China's government's media promotion to eliminate polygamist marriages. After 1949, I heard, the People's Republic of China's government had forcefully separated existing polygamist families and encouraged the mothers to have a job for the same purpose. My great-grandmother was born before 1900, my grandfather was born in 1912.（一个小小的信息：我听说是在1920年以后，中国的一夫多妻婚姻的小妾成了娼妓和讨饭的代名词，我听说这是因为中华民国政府利用宣传媒体取缔一夫多妻婚姻的努力。1949年解放以后，我听说中华人民共和国政府是强制分开当时的一妻多夫家庭，并鼓励已经做了母亲的小妾做工就业以实现同样的目的。我的曾祖母是1900年以前出生的，结婚后是在1912年生下我的爷爷。）
So, I announce here: (我在这里宣布：）
All my grandmothers were the King Mothers,（我所有的奶奶都是母后娘娘。）
My father was mothered by his father's only wife.（我的父亲是由他父亲即我爷爷的唯一妻子所生。）
I myself is mothered by my father's only wife.（我自己是由我父亲的唯一妻子所生。)
I am the heir to the long-history Fang's house.（我是有着悠久历史的方家的继承人小姐。）
I refuse to privilege any of my great-grandmother's cousins' children.（我拒绝把我曾祖母的娘家于姓亲戚的小孩当成是方家的后人。）
----July 16th, 2018
07-15-2018 my searching diary "what did I inherit if I did inherit"(我的找寻日记 --“如果我真的有继承财产，我继承的究竟是什么呀”）
Heard this morning's talk about the American "Pejoves" Fund company.（听说了今天早上提到了美国“Pejoves”基金公司）
My response: （我的回应:)
I already expressed myself refuse to give up any share that my Trust entity has invested, and I really don't need to say anything else beyond this. (我已经表达了我本人拒绝放弃我所继承的信托对这家公司的任何投资份额。除此之外，我也确实不需要再说什么了。）
I have published a lot on this blog in hope my missing father can read me if he does a search of his own name together with my name in Chinese, I hope the same for my mother as well if she is still alive. I don't know where they are but I am confident about their well-being because I have entrusted my care for them since 2004. I hope they know my experience to better take care of themselves while I can't take care of them myself. This is also the blog of my searching diary "what did I inherit if I did inherit". I share an essay here that I wrote about how my life changed because of this search.（我在这个博客上发表了很多博文，我希望我失踪的父亲用中文将他自己的名字和我的名字一起做个搜寻就可以看到，我也是这么希望我的母亲还在也可以用这方法看到我的博文。我不知道他们在哪里，但我相信他们很好就因为我在2004年办理信托时也托付了我对他们的照顾。我希望他们能知道我的经历，能在我还不能亲自照顾他们时可以照顾好他们自己。这博客也是我的找寻日记 --“如果我真的有继承财产，我继承的究竟是什么呀“。我在这里分享我所写的一篇有关我的生活变更的散文。）
Essay of "what did I inherit if I did inherit"（散文“如果我真的有继承财产，我继承的究竟是什么”）
I quitted my computer professional job in 2007 with the anticipation of having an early retirement life when the radio program majorly featured my life experiences had already had a successful run for two years in the United States. My life change had been so unbelievable to a lot of people who had known me, but so comfortably settled-in by myself: I became the homeless in 2009.（我是在2007年广播剧已经在美国热播我的人生经历故事两年后辞去了我的电脑上班族的工作，准备享受一份可以提早退休的悠闲生活。让很多认识我的人很吃惊但我自己却怡然自得的一个生活改变是在2009年，我成了一个街上的流浪汉。）
I was advised to have some homeless experiences by a Chinese “guest” to my meeting on July 1st of 2004. I was not the person invited him. I heard recently that he shared the same last name but not having blood association with me – it has been rumored that his family has been a result of a relative's marriage issue several generations ago. Ever since that generation, I heard his family has been following around my great several grandfather's line (a junior half-brother to that relative), the saying was "they are following the money". I heard himself was mothered by a Miss Yu (于). I wish I knew who he is and why he was invited into my meeting to know this advice was possibly never good intentioned.（在2004年7月1日，我在我的电讯会议上被一个华裔“客人”建议去做个流浪汉。他不是由我邀请参加这个会议的客人。我听说他和我同姓但没有任何血缘关系 --据说他们家是我们家几代以前的一个亲戚婚姻困扰的结果。好像我们家这支那一代的曾祖父是那个亲戚的同父异母幼弟，我听说他们家被我们家的那个亲戚发现后，从那一代开始，我们家就一直被他们家跟着，据说他们家是在跟着钱走。我听说他本人的妈妈姓于，我真是希望我当时知道他是谁可能就会猜到这建议也许是一点善意都没有的。）
I came from a family with a lot of family stories of “what happened to the family wealth”, such as my grandmother married into the house full of gold-bricks, my great-grandfather could afford to buy a car in 1920’s China, but wealth went disappeared in my grandfather’s generation, etc. I was not surprised at all when I was told I inherited some handsome wealth invested abroad according to my grandfather’s will. I did not even ask which generation grandfather had blessed me. When I was all happy about my life could be easier after I take care of my anxiety health situation that I had developed around 2004, this "be homeless" was the advice that I was not afraid of adventuring. （我们家里一直有很多“家里以前的钱究竟怎么回事”的故事，比如我奶奶进门的时候家里到处都是一堆堆的金砖，我曾祖父在20年代的中国是可以买得起小轿车的，但是到了我爷爷那一代，家里的钱就不见了，等等。所以当我被告知按照我爷爷的遗嘱，我继承了我爷爷投资海外的财产时，我是一点都没奇怪。我甚至都没问究竟是那一代的爷爷对我这么好。当我很开心我可以在照顾好我自己当时因为生活各方面压力过大而产生的恐惧症状后就可以过个快乐人生，所以我对这个探险建议是一点都没担心过。）
In January of 2015, I had this nightmare experience of realizing that my financial situation wouldn’t change even I already fed up with my homeless game. I was yelled at why I would fancy I could stuck-on some rich men I met a long time ago, I was told I never had any professional achievements no matter how popular smartphones have been, and I was told my father "died" when I was unreachable, and my own last will was already prepared so I could just die alone in poverty in my current residence.（2015年1月，我就像噩梦惊醒一般意识到就算我已经玩腻了流浪者游戏，我的经济状况好像是不会改变的。我被人当街吼着我怎么会认为可以缠着一个多年以前就只见过一面的有钱男人, 我到哪儿面对的都是众人“就算智能手机普及，可你就是从来就没有过任何职业上的成就”这么一种态度，我被告知当我无法联络时，我的父亲“也已经去世了”，甚至说是遗嘱都已经替我准备好了让我可以安心在我现在住的这个一室套房里穷困潦倒等死就得，等等。）
I have been expecting my own birth Chinese grandfather’s blessing to provide for me financially, never any rich man’s never-romance money, but where is the money? The few references I remembered have been controversial. The American companies I thought I inherited have been registered to British companies in the entire companies’ history, the grandfather who blessed me was not my same last name, etc. The journey started off to find where is my money became the journey of finding my family ancestry, what happened to my computer professional achievements, and most importantly, a historical review of what I have inherited, etc., as you heard on the radio.（我其实一直是在等我自己亲生爷爷给我的钱来提供我的生活费用，从来不是什么有钱人的“从没发生过的裤裆钱”，但究竟钱在哪里? 我所记得的仅有的一些线索有很奇怪。我以为是我继承的美国公司其实都是法律上注册为英国公司的子公司的，听说这些公司的投资人不是姓方的，等等。就这样，我这一路“钱在哪里”的过程同时就又成了我的家世历史的探寻之旅，“我的电脑专业的成就怎么没了”的问询之路，以及最重要的，这是”我究竟继承了什么的”漫长历史回顾，就如你在广播剧里所听到的。)
The change started when I face the reality-real question if I have ever inherited. I started my confronting efforts in January of 2015 by walking into a police station in Boston of Massachusetts and asked where I should find any help if I am certain I have "inherited something" experience but I don’t know where to send out inquiries. Ever since then, I started my journey of finding out what my inheriting experience means.（改变是从我买你对这个现实又实际的问题，就是如果我真的有继承财产，那我究竟继承了成了什么？我选择了面对，我是在2015年1月走进了波士顿的一家警察局，探寻如果我确实有继承财产的经历又不知该如何查询的情况下，我应该如何寻求帮助？从那时到现在，我就是这么一路颠簸走来。）
07-14-2018 The chart is in simple English and Shanghainese are shrewd enough (表格是简单英语，上海人又是很精明的）
Heard this morning's big argument why can't have the money from the company.（听说了今天早上所争议的的为什么不可以从公司拿钱？）
My response:（我的回应：）
In the entire People's Republic of China, I only recommend Shanghainese, not even from neighboring area, should be invited to take a look at the following table to bring out their comments of the argument on where anyone can expect money to be spent from?（整个中华人民共和国，我就推荐应该让上海人民来看看下面这张表（上海周边地区人民都不行），然后来谈谈他们认为公司什么地方有可能为这些就是该有钱拿的人从公司开支？）
I am presenting my points:（我提出我的观点：）
Before the company paying the taxes, all the law people are staring at each expense for tax purpose;
（在公司缴纳公司税之前，执法人员全盯着公司的开支是否有偷漏税行为。）
After company-taxes paid, every penny of the Net Income is owned by the British investor company.
(公司缴纳了公司税之后，盈利的每一分钱都是归英国投资公司所有。）
A private company's auditing rules are defined by the investor which is the British investor company.
（审计法所依据的审计规则， 私营公司的由其投资机构所指定，也就是由英国公司制定。）
So, let's look at the ridiculousness here: (来看看这些某明奇妙：）
1: Where this deserved money can be spent by this American company? (这“就是应该拿的钱”有可能从美国公司的什么地方开支啊？）
2: If this person can have the opportunities to argue, to self-announce, and to self-promote on the radio to be the real best and the most deserved person, how could this person possibly become the real owner of the American company in the reality of a lawful country to take over the Net Income?（如果这个人可以在广播上连吵闹加自我宣布再加自我深情表白自己才是最好最配拿钱的一个，有什么可能这个人就可以将自己因此而变成一个在法治国家这个现实中的美国公司真正主人而把美国公司的盈利（从英国公司手里）给那走啊？)
Why Shanghainese? Well, Shanghainese are famous for their shrewdness of only participating in any activity for benefits but never for any trouble. （为什么上海人？上海人在中国是有名的精明：有好处才参与，只有麻烦没有好处就躲得远远。）
----July 14th, 2018
Heard the possible "negotiation of possible shares“. (听说了可能”谈判一下可能的份额“）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I refuse this possibility. I already made myself very clearly: I am the sole beneficiary person clearly specified by the Settler grandfather's will, and my inheriting was the Trust-inheriting are the reasons I did not take anyone's possible inheritable share in any Trust-entity I inherited. (我拒绝这样的可能。我已经讲得很清楚了，我是委托人爷爷在委托信遗嘱里指明的唯一受益人，我的继承的是信托继承，这是我说我所继承的任何一个信托里都没有任何其他人份额的原因。）
So, I refuse any kind "negotiation" possibility. (所以我拒绝任何这样的”谈判“可能。）
I consider "just can't understand" as harassment if anyone refuses to consult the law professionals regarding any concern or any possible accusation if I steal others' possible inheritable, etc. related to the matter but insist on negotiating with me. （对我的继承有些疑问甚至有一些“方敏是否偷了方家其他人的钱”的指责，却坚决不去咨询法律界或向警界求助，只是不停对我表达“就是不理解”等种种做法，我认为是纯属骚扰行为。）
I refuse to be harassed in the name of "negotiating".（我拒绝被以谈判为名而骚扰。）
----July 14th, 2018
Regarding $10,000 monthly providing confusions. (有关每月一万美金生活费的疑问）
My response: （我的回应：）
I heard one confusion was why not call for help to get the money.（我听说一个疑问就是为什么不呼救？）
I was born in 1967 when China was in culture revolution time.（我是于1967年在中国的文化大革命期间出生的。）
Chinese culture revolution time was 1966-1976. It was the time when government officials could be grabbed by a Red Guard teenage on a street to be permanently locked up in a dark room till the death.（中国的文化大革命是从1966到1976年。当时的国家干部是可以在街上被一个十几岁的红卫兵直接抓走，再被永远的关在一个黑屋子里直到死亡。）
----July 14th, 2018
07-13-2018 I am quiet because I got the meaning of the 2016 information
Heard "the voice" getting stronger because I have been no sound.
My response:
I heard this morning's talk is all about I am not good enough for any decent name for any reason. Is it because I have no sound lately? Exactly, whose voice is getting so loud and strong?
It is "the voice" of who owns the American "Pejoves" Fund company. I heard O's family has been blamed for not standing strong on the similar matter, and the proud expressed this morning was "This same person now obviously have no sound at all, only the company is still squeaking. Just need to be tough enough."
When I was told about the British East India company's financier, the intention was to tell me that the American company has been registered privately to a British company, not to any American. Well, I got it means I own the British Investor company as well, I assume Os were busy confirming about the American company's "Independent Talk", I assume that's all we got from this 2016's information.
Actually, for everyone else, it means who owns the net income money after the American Fund company paid its U.S. Company Tax which is its British investor company.
Now, I got this correctly is the reason I have been so quiet about any confusion regarding the American "Pejoves" Fund company. The Trust entity I inherited has been this American "Pejoves" Fund company's upstream investor which is several investor-companies away, and I already expressed myself not willing to give up any share that my Trust entity has invested, so I should not have any sound at all regarding anything else.
----July 13th, 2018
I heard this morning's talk of tax donation to China.（听说了今天早上所谈的向中国捐税之说)
My response:（我的回应：）
I refuse. I refuse to pay to be a victim, I refuse to be a paid victim, I refuse to be a victim. (我拒绝。我拒绝付钱成为受害者，我拒绝收钱成为受害者，我拒绝做一个受害者·。）
I have been the victim of this administration of the Chinese government's abusive usage of its government resources and the government's staff. （我是这一届中国政府滥用公款滥用公务员公权力的受害者。）
This entire radio program since 2015 has been an entertainment “performing arts' show” organized by the Chinese Culture Department, Chinese Foreign Department, Chinese Communication (Propaganda) Department, Chinese Military Entertainment group, and Chinese Central government Political Committee.（从2015年起的广播剧有关活动，都是由中国文化部，中国外交部，中国宣传部，中国军方文艺部门及中国中央政治局所组织的一场大规模的“文艺演出活动”。）
I have been the victim of this Chinese administration's organized blackmails scheme, cheating scheme, and extorting scheme. My life has been threatened by this forceful demanding for money without any legal ground.（我是中国这一届政府所组织的讹诈伎俩，欺诈伎俩及敲诈伎俩的受害者。我自己的人身财产安全都被这种没有任何法律依据的就是要钱的要求而威胁着。）
My inheriting has been birthmark sole-beneficiary person Trust-Inheriting by clearly written wills. There is no legal confusion about the Trust-wealth nor who is the sole beneficiary person. There is no legal ground for anyone to file a civil lawsuit regarding my inheriting nor any privilege to commit any crime.（我的继承是由遗嘱明确指定胎记掌纹唯一受益人的信托继承。既没有关所于信托财产的任何法律上的困扰，也没有关于我是唯一受益人的法律上的困扰。没有任何人可以就我的继承相关的法律困扰而向民事法庭起诉，更没有任何可以因此犯法的特权。）
I refuse to fund or refund these kind activities via its Central Reserve's tax collecting.（我拒绝以向中国政府缴税方式出资资助或者报销这一类活动。）
I refuse. I refuse to pay to be a victim, I refuse to be a paid victim, I refuse to be a victim.(我拒绝。我拒绝付钱成为受害者，我拒绝收钱成为受害者，我拒绝做一个受害者·。）
----July 12th, 2018
About what I heard of this organized performing arts presentations.（我所听说的一些有关这次演出活动的）
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard Chinese actresses and actors groups have been performing worldwide,（我听说中国的男女演员们是在世界各地开展这种演出活动：）
The theme in Italy was: "Fight against illegal organization format, the Family."（在意大利演出的主题是：坚决反对违法组织结构：黑手党家族。）
The theme in the U.K. has been: "Show you the difference between the Continentals and the Islanders".（在英国演出的主题：“让你们见识一下泱泱大国气势和小小岛国娟秀之间的区别”。）
The theme in the U.S. has been: "If you know any English, you know the U.S. has really awful laws."（在美国演出的主题：“你要是会英语，你就知道美国法律根本就是拿你一点办法都没有。”）
----July 12th, 2018
Heard this morning's attorney（有关今天早上的律师）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I don't know if he wants to be my attorney or he has been hired by my entrusting attorneys.（我不知道他是想做我的律师，还是已经被我的信托律师所雇佣的。）
In another word, I am currently not his client yet, and I don't know if my entrusting attorneys are his client, so I don't know who is his client.（换句话说就是，我目前肯定没有雇佣他，我不知道我的信托律师有没有雇佣他，所以我不知道是谁雇佣他的。）
----July 12th, 2018
07-11-2018 Happy I am not expected to be a leftover's partner.
Heard this morning' teary story telling.
My response:
I heard the one choking handsome 40-ish already married to his wife in 2007, a never secret in the U.S. entertainment industry.
Others, well...
All are none of my business other than I need to make the statement that I am happy to be the refused potential client to this type of matching with a permanently-leftover-for-life dating service.
Another note to the statement: A male in his 60s promised his life-long willingness this morning to have sex with anyone who is(was, has been, will be) my enemy,
I say I wish I can be near to a farm place to piss off a well good numbered biologically authentic and convincing enough female pig-s to make his life busy with promising-fulfilling-s from his promised willingness.
I refuse all these persons to spend any of my money.
----July 11th, 2018
07-10-2018 Now searching is narrowed to if and where is the paid-out from the Trust entity I am the sole beneficiary of. (现在"寻宝"就是在寻我是唯一受益人的信托是否已支付以及钱在哪里。）
Heard this morning's talk about Boston government agencies' explanation and frustration （听说了今天早上波士顿政府机关的解释及气愤）.
My response:（我的回应：）
Well, I am the British East India Company Financier is never a joke but a statement, I can lawfully state so because a Trust entity I inherited has been its upstream investor. This historic "title" was the reason for "romantic rumors" associated with the British Royals.（我是英国东印度公司的投资人，这话从来不是一句玩笑而是一份声明。我可以合法这么自称就是因为我所继承的一家信托机构是其上游的一个投资机构。这个已经有点历史的“头衔”是坊间曾有一些英国王室恋爱奇闻的原因。）
I know the frustration is because I complained my civil right got impacted that they were making the quiet presentation of "No such American male's rich heart, no such money." when I inquired about my providing from my own inherited Trust entity that set up for me by my own birth Chinese grandfathers.（我知道了气愤的原因，就是因为我曾向麻州总检察长办公室投诉波士顿的政府机关歧视我目前没有性生活的状态是在侵犯我的基本人权，我投诉我问他们我自己亲生华人爷爷替我设的信托机构所付给我的钱在哪，他们就沉默以对一副“没有了男人的富裕心，就没有了这钱"。）
I am glad to hear that Boston government agencies did not discriminate against my current sexual status as an inactive female. They truly don't know what I was saying because they have not been the office to know the financial arrangement details. I believe this explanation because I had been telling them where to find my big inherited money which has never been their job when my debt size is so no comparison small.（我很高兴听到波士顿政府机关确实没歧视我现在独自一人生活的状态。他们不是专门负责这项委托业务的办公室，不知道有关这份委托的具体情况，所以确实不知道我在说什么。我相信这份解释，我确实是一直在向他们指明去哪找我所继承的大笔钱财来还我所欠的小小债务，替我找钱确实还真不是他们的工作。）
Now, I learned that my inquiries, with some references, should be all about if there are paid-out funds for my living expenses provided in these departments.（现在我学会了，我的询问应该是提供一些线索来查询我的信托机构是否已经支付给他们的部门一些我的生活费用了。）
----July 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about the sole beneficiary（听说了今天早上有关唯一受益人的谈论）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I am the sole beneficiary specified in the Settler's Letter that is several hundred years old is because I am the expected girl who carries a family birthmark. My family had waited for 2500 years to have such a girl who has the family birthmark finally born. It has been a long waiting for my family to finally have me to be their little girl heir. I am specified as the Birthmark-Palm girl-heir from the Birthmark-Palm boy-heirs' line in the Settler's Letter.（我是唯一受益人是在信托设立人所立的信托委托书里清楚写明的，这份几百年前的委托书里可以在我还未生出就已经明确指定我是唯一受益人就因为我是我们家在等着的有继承胎记的女孩。我们家可是经过了2500年才很不容易的将这个女孩给生出来了。我们家真是等我这个胎记女孩等了很久诶。我在信托设立人的委托书里是被指定为胎记掌纹儿子这支所生的胎记掌纹女儿。）
Regarding some confusion how other offspring know they are not the specified beneficiary person of the Trust entity I inherited. Well, by the factor the Trust entity are several hundred years old, and those offspring are not even over 100 years old yet so that they don't even have a name to be specified in the Settler's letter.（至于有些方家其他后人如何确定他们不是我所继承的信托机构的指定受益人，这么说吧，就只要依据事实，也就是我所继承的信托机构已经有好几百年的存在历史，而他们都还不足百岁的事实，也就是在信托设立时他们都还没生出来这个事实就应该可以确定信托设立人当年所写的委托书里不可能会有他们的名字。）
Since ancient time, each generation all had family-wealth inheriting till my father's generation when my grandfather passed away in 1965. I do not know if any of them also has any Trust entity set up somewhere by their own seniors.（自古开始一直到我爷爷1965年去世时的我父亲这代，我们家每一代都有分家分财产。我完全不知道这些方家后人当中是否还有其他人也有家中老人替谁在什么地方设立过什么信托。）
My inheriting in 2004 was the Trust-Entities Inheriting, Not the family-wealth inheriting. （我在2004年的继承是继承信托机构，不是继承家族因老人去世分家产所分财产。）
I am the sole beneficiary person is what clearly specified in each Settler's letter of the Trust entities I inherited.（我是唯一受益人是我所继承的所有这些信托机构的信托设立人在委托书里所明确指定的。）
*An Entity is an organization that is equivalent to a company which means a format of a legally valid organization.（一个Entity 就是一个类似于”公司”的机构组织，是一种法律上的有效机构又称法人机构。）
----July 10th, 2018
07-09-2018 Politely and publicly is my proud to be who I am.
Heard this morning's shouting of "nothing to do with you".
My response:
This is obviously organized to block me from any human social activities, the participants are either obviously so despised or from the personal preferences, the organizers' intention is so obviously to exclude with the proud God tone of "You are Not Allowed".
This trend has been since 2015 from the British Royals and carried on by American rich to educate the world audience, I assume.
So, To all my readers, I write interweb-ly:
To the assumption, I reply politely:
Well, I am an American wealthy rich with my Chinese grandfather-Emperors' handsome blessing, so I am good with my own inherited.
Well, I am a Catholic who seldom practices my Catholicism, but I refuse to take any human as a living God to rule my life.
Well, I am willing to be with those who know who I am, I am willing to have nothing to do with those who never know a bit of who I am, and I am willing to respect those personal preferences.
To the intention, I express publicly:
I refuse to be thrown shit at to promote any pair of breasts that I have no desire to enjoy,
I refuse to be the victim of any breasts-appreciation presentation to belittle my own pair,
I refuse those who worship human original reproduction activities to take away my proud of my intelligence developed from the modern education.
To the expectation, I address proudly
All these matters, I take as my social expedition to be recognized for who I truly am.
All these matters, I take as my social preparation to be introduced for who I inherited am.
All these matters, I take as my social endeavor to be acknowledged for who I preference am.
I take all these matters are the law matters.
----July 9th, 2018
07-08-2018 It seems all about rational expression of cold maliciousness that anyone can hear from this morning's broadcasting.（今天早上播出的好像充斥的全是冷静理性表达的恶意敌意）
Heard this morning's "administrative order" to the social security（听说了今天早上的“管理令”）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I do not qualify for the social security help if I am not in the situation of being provided by my own wealth under entrusting via the social security. (如果不是因为我的信托是通过社会福利系统支付我生活费用的，我确实是不符合需要社会福利系统来帮助支付生活费用的标准。）
This is a true statement and this is the reason I have been constantly contacting the government's agencies regarding where is the paid-out providing from my own wealth.（这是事实，这也是我一直在联络各政府机关我的信托已支付款项在哪里的原因。）
Also, I am well-known to all government agencies, worldwide to be accurate, that I am the worldwide famous for being the major featured person of a worldwide popular radio program for over 10 years time. This certain means I am world famously can afford my borrowing of the U.S. social security's paying for my living expenses coverage once the legal situation of the radio program's payment cleared.（再说了，对于全世界的政府机构来说，我可能都是一个非常有名的热播超过10年的广播剧女主角。这当然也让我确定是个世界上都共知的还得起这些钱的人物，即一旦广播剧收入有关的法律状态结束，凭广播剧收入就肯定能还的起我向社会福利系统借用的救济贫穷标准的生活费用给付。）
I just don't know why this Mrs. Jessica R, the giver of this morning's "administrative order", is so agitated about my life? Exactly, what this Mrs. Jessica R could possibly compete about to have this constant agitation against me? To have a bigger name than Mrs. R?（我就是不明白今天早上这个“管理令”的发令人Jessica R夫人，她为什么就是对于我的生活如此激愤？究竟这个Jessica R夫人比着飙着的是什么，就是如此不停的对我找茬？是想要个比R夫人还响亮的名字？
Rumored this is the same Mrs. R who I have been complained about, the one who has been so impressive about her value of being a woman that the motherhood should mean "mothering anyone's sermons from the street" so that any matured woman deserves to do a DNA test with any adult whoever fancying to be mothered.（听说这就是同一个我一直在抱怨其对于女人价值是什么的观点很离谱的R夫人。似乎这个R夫人就是坚定认为一个成年女人要是当了妈就意味着她很有可能是被街上的任何一个给下的种，所以这个R夫人就是坚持强硬要求，只要是一个成年女人，就是应该满足任何一个想要有个妈的成年人做个DNA亲母子亲母女鉴定的要求。）
I refuse to be targeted as a victim of her constant harassment, so this is my response to this Mrs. Jessica R: A much bigger name than Mrs. R? Who might that be? The rumored infamous A.G. who has the "fame" of matching every prominent male to a leftover female from him? Well, I did hear some rumors about her as broadcasted this morning, a ridiculous rumor indeed, but a perfect match to the ridiculous herself is so true.（我拒绝成为被这个R夫人无休止骚扰的受害者，所以我对这个R夫人说：比R夫人还要响亮的名字？谁啊？那个传说中的臭名昭著的AG，就是那个让名门小子个个都娶个他自己啃过的剩饭菜的那个？确实，我也听说过今天早上播出的那个无稽传言，但这个传言的无稽程度和这个R夫人自己行为的无稽程度倒是挺般配的。）
But I have nothing to do with this A.G. other than being a victim of this A.G.'s possible criminal activities.（但我除了有可能是这个A.G.的一些有可能牵涉到是否已经刑事犯罪的一些行为的受害者之外，真是一点关系都没有啊。）
Oh, I got it, is it because I suppose to be the victim of "the pair" from her fantasy? Is it because I am already the victim of the possible attempted murder by A.G., this Jessica R is attempting to murder to make me the victim of hers as well to pair herself as "the pair of the attempted murders" with a much bigger name than Mrs. R, is that so? I refuse to be a victim of "the pair of the attempted murders".（我明白了，我应该是她幻想中“一对”的受害者？就因为我现在已经是A.G 试图谋杀的受害者，就应该也成为这个R夫人试图谋杀的受害者好让R夫人可以在“一对试图谋杀者”的称呼里可以和比R名字更响亮地A.G.成为一对，是这样么？我拒绝成为这“一对试图谋杀者”的任何意义上的受害人。
----July 8th, 2018
Heard the new definition of a relative from China（听说了今天早上来自中国的亲戚新定义）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I am traditional on the definition of what is a relative.（我对于亲戚的理解是遵循传统。）
I heard this morning's new definition is "Give me money to phone me a relative". So, I take it as the advice to save my phone bill.（我听说今天早上对亲戚的新定义是：“拿钱来再打电话给我说是个亲戚”，那我就当这是在让我省点电话费了。）
Also, this morning's saying of "tell me you have money when you have a stack on the table". But that will be the time when I mostly use credit cards or checks instead of cash in order not to hire a cash-footman. I only requested to have some cash to carry around. So, I say to you on this blog that I am lawfully a rich person who is not interested to show you a cash stack in the near or far future.（还有，今天早上所言，“等你能在桌上放上一叠钱之后，再和我说你有钱”。 但那个时候，我是依赖信用卡和支票来减少随身现金，否则就得找个跑腿的天天帮着我拎钱。我就只要求了准备一点现金让我可以随身携带。所以，我就在这个博客上和你说，我的钱都是符合法律的，我现在和今后都不会向你展示一叠叠的现金。）
Another one, A relative deserve to be cashed for the DNA resemblance. My answer is: I refuse to pay for the useless. （再来一个：做亲戚就应该按DNA鉴定结果付现金，我的回答就是：我拒绝花钱买无用。）
To the person who announced the intention to kill: You must be on law enforcement's close watch now. I refuse to be contacted by your any effort, I refuse my entire romantic family as well as my parents to be contacted by your any effort. You are not an in-law to me according to the People's Republic of China's marriage laws. You are never a biological relative to my biological children.（给那个宣布说杀我是不会犹豫的：你一定已经被执法机关给盯上了。我拒绝你任何企图与我取得联系的努力。我拒绝你任何企图和我的婚恋家庭的任何成员取得任何联系的任何努力。按照中国的婚姻法，你从来就不是我的任何亲戚， 你也从来就不是我亲生孩子的任何血缘亲戚。）
----July 8th, 2018
07-07-2018 I have inherited Trust entities, and I have intellectual Income （我有继承信托，我也有智慧产权收入）
Heard this morning's talk about diplomats' argument（听说了今天早上的外交官争论）.
My response:
Well, as long as my claim that I am the British East Company's Financier is according to laws which are beyond the Constitution itself, the Justice Department will serve the Foreign Department on the argument as the law matter authority.（我的回应：只要我宣称我是英国东印度公司的财经人是根据法律而且是超越了宪法所赋予的言论自由的范围，司法部就会作为法律事物的权威机构而向外交部提供与争论相关的法务服务。）
It is lawful for me to claim I am truly the British East India company's Financier because the Trust entity I inherited has been its up-stream investor. （我宣称我真真实实是英国东印度公司的财经人是合法的，就因为我所继承的信托一直是其上游投资机构。）
----July 6th, 2018
----July 7th, 2018
Heard this morning's agitation from Boston Chinese community（听说了今天早上所提的波士顿中国城的激愤）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I heard the agitated is an in-law to the investors of the Boston C-Mart Chinese Supermarket chain (波士顿中国超市连锁). I heard the husband is mothered by a Miss Yu （于）from Shanghai area.（我听说今天早上特别激愤的那个是波士顿中国超市连锁的一个姻亲，听说当丈夫的是由上海地区来的一个于家小姐所生的。）
I take the intention is obviously to cut off my possible financial help from the U.S. Government based on the effort to completely ignore the known fact in Boston Chinese community that this is the same radio program which I world-known for being the major featured person for its over 10 years worldwide broadcasting, also the effort is to completely ignore the fact that the United States is a lawful country which equipped with labor laws as well as intellectual laws that my contributions to this radio program's success as the major featured person should have been protected by the U.S. laws.（我认为这激愤的目的就是要掐断由美国政府提供给我的财务帮助，这是基于完全无视我本人就是这同一部广播剧超过0年全世界热播的女主角的一份尝试，这是基于完全无视美国是个有劳工法和智慧产权法的法治国家会提供保护我对广播剧贡献的一份尝试。）
I take all these Boston Chinese community's ridiculous agitations regarding my welfare level benefits, which are based on this intentionally to be ignorant efforts, are purposed to trash me to promote themselves which I call it a legal situation that may be a hate crime severe.（我认为波士顿华裔社区就我能拿到由美国政府提供的低水平救济福利的这份莫名其妙的激愤，也就是基于有意装无知来愤怒的这份努力，目的就是来踩跺我方敏以拔高他们自己，我是将此归类为有可能是严重到类似仇恨犯罪的法律问题。）
Exactly when I will have my income from the radio company to be realized in my named-ID accessible bank account, I say I am not the authority to have the answer but I know I am helped. My complaint has been under investigation. I won't be concerned to shop in C-Mart as well.（究竟什么时候我才能在我自己能拿到的钱的银行账户里看到我的广播剧收入，我还真不是可以给答案的权威，但我已经被法律所保护，我的投诉也已经被调查。我也不会担心我该如何去波士顿的中国超市买菜。）
----July 7th, 2018
Heard the confusion why I deserve this radio program's major featured person fee （听说了凭什么我拿主要角色费的疑问）.
My response: （我的回应：）
This radio program's commercial broadcasting my life experiences stories from myself's own creation is the reason I deserve the major featured person fee.（这个广播剧的商业播出我自己创作的我的人生经历故事是我凭什么该拿广播剧主要角色费的原因。)
The major-featured-person fee and producing fee are both intellectual income. I did not participate in any producing efforts is the reason I share half-half with the producing team. The major featured person's share can be over 75% if participating in producing efforts while the producing team gets 25%.（主要角色费和制作费都是智慧产权收入。我没有参与任何制作努力是我和制作团队对半分的原因。如果参与制作，主要角色费所占比例可高达75%左右而制作团队只拿25%。）
The difference between the radio program's producing team and a fiction writer is the producing team reports my life stories as reality shows while a fiction writer writes own made-up stories based on original using made-up names but not reporting, the original personnel is unidentifiable and fiction stories are commonly understood as not real.（这个广播剧的制作团队和文学小说作家的区别就是，广播剧制作组是报道我的人生真实故事来制作真实剧，而一部小说的作家根据人物事件原型来编造小说人物名字从而进行创作来编造小说故事情节，原型人物在小说中已不可识别，小说故事情节被公众认可为既不是真实人物也不是真实事件报道而是虚拟文学创作。）
The difference between business idea's creator and the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising creative team and the advertising producing team. The creative business idea needs to be approved by the in-interest company, similar to advertising creative team's idea need to be approved by the advertising client, the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising producing team.（生意创意和公司生意执行团队的区别就像是广告创意团队和广告制作团队的区别。生意创意是需要对创意有兴趣企业的批准，就像是广告创意团队的创意是需要广告客户批准的一样，而公司生意执行团队就像广告制作团队一样。）
Be the identifiable truthful person, I have never been willing to be made-up upon or patch up upon fake or unreal stories of my life is the reason I have been constantly calling law enforcement's help on this radio program's sexual harassment efforts and public-harming my name efforts.（作为在现实生活中可辩别可识的真实人物，我从不愿意被人编造及编辑虚假不真实的所谓人生故事是我不停的就广播剧对我实施严重性骚扰并恶意故意破坏我方敏名誉而报警的原因。）
So far, I have been the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's illegal transferring out of my intellectual income, the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's organized severe sexual harassment since 2015, etc.（到目前为止，按照美国刑法，我是被广播剧非法转出我的智慧产权收入的受害人，从2015年起被广播剧重度性骚扰的受害人，等等。）
---- original published on July 1st of 2018
----July 7th, 2018
07-06-2018 It is lawful for me to claim I am truly the British East India company's Financier（我宣称我真真实实是英国东印度公司的财经人是合法的）
Heard this morning's anger from the China and Chinese communities abroad（听说了今天早上中国和海外华裔社区的愤怒表达）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard this morning's anger outburst is triggered by the verification that I am truly the British East India company's financier, but the anger is not actually about why I am the sole beneficiary person or why me, the anger may be is about the frustration related to a Mr. D. R.（我听说今天早上的愤怒爆发是因为确认了我确实是英国东印度公司的财经人，但这愤怒并不是针对为什么是我或者为什么我是唯一受益人，今天早上的愤怒好像是和一个D.R.先生有关。）
If the frustration is related to a Mr. D. R, well, I have nothing to do with any Mr. D. R is all I can clarify.（如果今天早上的那份倍受挫折的感觉是因一个D.R.先生而起，我就只需要澄清我从未和任何一个D.R.先生有关任何关系。）
If the frustration is about why me, I have to say I have explained all this time that I am the birthmark heir of my upstream line-of-grandfathers is the reason for why me. I am the sole beneficiary person is specified by the Trust entity's settler grandfather in his entrusting letter.（如果这份挫折感是出自为什么是我，我只能说我已经解释到现在了我是我这一支爷爷们的胎记继承人所以是我继承，我是唯一受益人是由信托的委托人爷爷在其设立信托的委托书里指定的。）
It is lawful for me to claim I am truly the British East India company's Financier because the Trust entity I inherited has been its up-stream investor. （我宣称我真真实实是英国东印度公司的财经人是合法的，就因为我所继承的信托一直是其上游投资机构。）
----July 6th, 2018
Heard there is at least one girl in Britain（听说今天早上提到有这么一个女孩）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I heard that girl mentioned in this morning's broadcasting is the announced daughter of the current Chinese Premier from a Chinese female diplomat broadcasted in the radio program. I have nothing to do with this girl's both announced parents, I have nothing to do with this girl's biological origin.（我听说今天早上提到的女孩其实是广播剧里所宣布的中国现任总理和一个中国女外交官所育的女儿。我和这个女孩的双亲没有任何关系，我和这个女孩没有任何血缘关系。）
Also, there is saying the girl mentioned this morning resembles me very much, I say this may be the same girl whose video was published in 2012, I have acknowledged the 2012-published girl and her rumored brother as the most likely my biological daughter & son. I am waiting for the private confirmation from my own entrusting attorneys to be a confirmed happy mother.（还有说今天早上提到的其实是一个和我长得很像的女孩，我说那这个女孩可能就是2012年有发布过录影资料的那一个。我是已经公开认可2012年所公布的女孩及她的兄弟很有可能是我的亲生子女。等到我的信托律师可以有条件就此私下向我确认之后，我就可以做一个经过证实的快乐妈妈了。）
I refuse this girl to be harassed by anyone for any reason. (我拒绝这个女孩被任何人以任何理由而骚扰。)
It is understood only psycho who refuses to acknowledge being a mother does not mean the ownership of all human sperms, nor means the only recipient of all sperms from the same family name.（只要花痴才会拒绝承认一个女人当了妈之后既不意味着这女人就此占尽了天下所有男人的精子，也不意味着这女人是同一个大家族所有精子的唯一受体。）
----July 6th, 2018
07-05-2018 I am truly really the British East India Company's Financier.（我确实是真真实实的英国东印度公司财经人）
Heard this morning's clarification on the British East India Company Financer（听说了今天早上澄清了谁是英国东印度公司财经人.）
My response:（我的回应：）
I am proud to be the requestor of a French Name which means "Min is so Pretty" for me to be introduced as the French named authentic British East India Company Financier according to the French customary saying. （我要求给我取个法国名字，字面意思就是“方敏真是漂亮啊”，我很骄傲我有需要用这名字来按照法国说法来介绍我自己是个正正宗宗的有着法国名字的英国东印度公司财经人。）
I acknowledge the British Crown Prince's saying "Not pretty at all" is commonly respected by my frankly realistically honest fellow American citizens as "Just not pretty yet".（我承认英国王储所言“一点都不漂亮”确实是广泛的被我坦率实际又诚实的美国同胞们所尊敬为“也就是还没漂亮而已啦”。）
I am willing to be in my most pretty British dresses, carrying my slightly Chinese accented American English, to express my doubts on what is worldwide acknowledged as "Young and Handsome", with the hard evidence from my private collection of the all possible great moments that never-wanted-me the British Crown Prince has not been known to all my social dealings.（我愿意穿着我最美的英国服饰，用我轻微中国口音的美式英语，来表达我是如何的怀疑那全世界都认可的”年轻英俊”，我会向我的社交好友呈现我的私有收藏作为我所表达观点的事实依据，也就是我所能收集到的那个"从来就没要过我的”英国王储那些不为众所周知的所有美妙瞬间留影。）
I promise I will never be a friend to whoever has ever romantically involved with the world-known my heart-theft British.（我保证我永远不和那些曾经被我那举世闻名的偷心英国人爱恋过的人做什么朋友。）
This British East India Company's Financier company ( a French company) has been the investor to the American "O' Confusion Fund" company(英国东印度公司财经人公司（一家法国公司）一直都是美国"O家困扰”基金公司的投资公司)
I am truly really the British East India Company's Financier.（我确实是真真实实的英国东印度公司财经人）
----July 5th, 2018
04-22-2018 没有了你们永远都不意味着失去。
06-26-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设
07-04-2018 Why China and Chinese community are so angry regarding the ownership of a 400 years old British investment in America?（为什么是中国及华裔社区对一家美国营运400年的英国投资所有权争议如此愤怒？）
Heard this morning's anger of "How dare She is talking about the O's confusion company again."(听说今天早上所谈“她居然又在说那O家的困扰公司啦？”）
My response:（我的回应：）
Of course, I would if I see I need to. I am proud the Trust entity I inherited in 2004 has been this great American company's upstream investor. （我当然会阿，只要我觉得需要只要我想谈。我很骄傲我所继承的信托是这家公司的上游投资机构啊。）
O'Connor's families have been associated with the American Fund company since the first Attorney O'Connor migrated to America from Britain and took the counselor's position offered by this American Fund company over 200 years ago. Ever since then, this first immigrant Attorney O'Connor's offspring have been greatly associated with this American Fund company's business operation for over 200 years which was the reason for O's family confusion regarding the company's ownership.（自从O家的第一代美国移民O‘Connor律师从英国来美国后接受了这家英国在美国的投资公司所提供的公司法律顾问的职务后，这个第一代移民O‘Connor律师的后人从那时起就和这家美国公司的业务经营活动有了超过200年的紧密联系，这是造成O家后人对公司所有权困扰的原因。）
I was confused because I did not know what I inherited is a Trust entity that has been invested in this American Fund company, the O'Connor's confusion about the company's ownership triggered my anxiety which was the reason of my public emotional argument on this American Fund company's ownership. I have never associated with this American Fund company's business operation. （我的困扰是源自我不清楚我所继承的其实是个信托公司，是我所继承的信托公司投资了这个美国基金公司。O家对公司所有权的困扰引发我的惊愕造成了我就这个美国基金公司所有权的所发表的公开及非常情绪化的陈述。我从未参与这家美国基金公司的任何业务活动。）
This American Fund company's upstream investor entity, the Trust entity I inherited in 2004, was set up by an ancient grandfather of mine between 1200AD to 1400AD. I am the sole beneficiary person specified in the settler's letter.（这家美国基金公司的上游投资机构，是我一个公元1200-1400年间的祖爷爷为我所设立的信托。我是作为这个信托的设立人在其委托书里指定的唯一受益人在2004年继承了这个信托。）
I heard this morning another Shanghai investment associated with this American Fund company expressed the Shanghai investment could provide for me as well but only upon its investor company's instruction. This American Fund company would instruct Shanghai investment if it receives its Brtish investor company's instruction to provide for me from Shanghai. I appreciate this understanding. Thanks.（我听说今天早上又有一家上海投资企业表态只要接到其上级投资公司的指示，上海投资企业也会按照其投资公司的要求支付我私人使用所需费用。这家美国基金公司如果接到其上级英国投资公司的指示由上海支付我的私人使用费用，这家美国基金公司是会通知其上海所投资的企业的。非常感谢上海方面对此的理解。）
I have been asking this question since my public emotional argument time in 2015-2016 on Boston's 96.9FM, why Chinese community abroad and the Chinese government are so angry about me stating this American Fund company is an investment.（自2015-2016年我在波士顿的96.9FM广播电台上就这家公司的所有权做公开及非常情绪化的陈述时，我就一直在问这个问题，为什么是华裔社区及中国政府对我方敏就这家美国基金公司所有权所做的陈述如此愤怒？）
This is an over 400 years old American company that has been registered to its British investor company the entire 400 years time include 200 years in the United States' government record, not register under my name nor O'Connor's.（这是一家已经营运400多年的美国公司，在过去400多年里，其工商局的法人登记就一直是其英国投资公司在美国的分公司，其中有两百来年这个公司法人登记的记录是在美国政府的档案库里，既没登记在我名下，也没登记在O'Connor名下。）
I have become a U.S citizen since June of 2015, why it is Chinese community and the Chinese government don't allow me to state my argument? This morning's anger is also from the Chinese community abroad and from the People's Republic of China, what legal grounds do they have to be this angry? Or what their confusion could possibly be on this ownership matter which should be law matter that they got nothing to do with?（我是自2015年6月成为美国公民的，为什么是华裔社区及中国政府不准我就公司的所有权发表我自己的陈述？今天早上的这个愤怒也是来自华裔社区及中华人民共和国的，他们凭什么法律依据可以如此愤怒？这个公司的所有权困扰是个美国的法律问题，又是和他们这些华裔华人一丁点关系都没有的一家公司的所有权问题，他们能有什么困扰让他们如此愤怒？）
This Chinese community's anger only towards this O's confusion American company's ownership, not towards the American "Pejoves" fund, nor other published American Funds as well.（这份来自华裔社区的愤怒就只针对这O家困扰美国基金公司，没有针对美国“Pejoves”基金公司，也不针对其他几个已经公开的美国基金公司。）
Without this Chinese community's ridiculous anger, I wouldn't be so emotional to express the arguments of my confusion publicly on the Boston radio in 2015-2016 time.（没有这份来自华裔社区的愤怒，我2015-2016年在波士顿广播上的陈述也不会情绪那么激动。）
Regarding the rumor of $5Billion rewarding commission of this American Fund company's "ownership successfully transferred", I have to be very honest say this so-called "ownership successfully transferred because of the radio program broadcasting" never happened, as the final clarification you already heard from the British investor company on the same radio program. This American O'Confusion Fund company is still registered as its British Investor's American Investment, as it has been in the past 400 years time. There's no such $5 Billion such commission.（至于那个“酬谢广播剧的播出成功的让公司换了主人的50亿美金的酬谢奖金"传言，我必须非常诚实的说这个所谓的”通过广播剧的一顿故事编造及一番广而告之的播出，就可以轻轻松松不花一分钱就让一家千亿美金的美国大基金公司随便换了个主人"的说法其实是从来就没有发生过的事情，这是听众已经听到的由这家美国基金公司的英国投资公司在同一个广播剧上已经澄清的事实。这家美国基金公司现在也还是合法登记为其英国投资公司的美国分公司，就象过去400年来一样。就不可能会有这么一份50亿美金的所谓奖金。）
----July 4th, 2018
07-03-2018 I am the one Born With the $10,000 and I am the one Inherited (我才是生下来就有了一万美金的，我才是已经继承了的。）
Somehow, Yu's families consider themselves the similar as O'Connors or "Amusing Incident" stories. (于家好像认为他们是和O家及”乌龙事件”家里是一样的）
According to the United States tax laws, the American companies don't have the freedom to use any company's resources to pay for private usage unless paid from the owner's account. Britain and France, etc. all have similar tax laws. American confused families and clarification of their historic confusion are the reasons for the delayed stop-providing. (按照美国税法，美国的公司没有支付私用开支的自由，除非开支是由股东账户（东家账户）支付。英国法国等等都有类似税法。美国困扰的家庭以及澄清他们因为历史而造成的困扰是公司按照法律必须停止供给被延迟的原因。）
Heard this morning's talk about "born with $9,000"（听说了今天早上提到了“生下来就有的9000美金）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I am the one Born With $9000 minus the delivery service charge from Shanghai to Nanjing, never any Yu's offspring. Yu's offspring born with detention crime.（我才是生下来就有9000美金的那一个，不过总额得减去上海到南京运费。于家后人从来就不是生下来就有钱的，于家后人是生下来就有非法扣押款项的刑事罪名才是真实。）
Yu's family's role in this $9000 story was a DHL or FedEx (UPS) office in China which had shared the residential property (private assistant Yu's apartment) as the package receiving and pick-up office. Yu's family just never delivered the package of $9000 nor informed the recipient who should be me nor my legal guardian( my parents). （于家在这个9000美金的事件中就像是敦豪航空货运公司DHL， 联邦快递FedEx，联合包裹服务公司UPS 在中国的设立的办事处，（也就是国内的网购快递之类的），用的是于姓私人助理的住家作为包裹收发办事处。于家从未送出这9000美金的包裹，也从未通知我方敏或者我的法律扶养人（我的父母）。）
As you heard it was clarified this $10,000 was first-time wired from the American company to Hongkong on July 22nd of 1967 (I was born on July 20th, 1967), wait for a week in Hong Kong for Chinese government's approval to be sent in. The approval was on July 31st of 1967 in the meeting, as you heard the clarification broadcasted on June 25th of 2018, that Chinese Premier Zhou did not against the delivery of this $10,000 at all. I heard the first-ever wire of this $10,000 had my name in Chinese（方敏) on the American wire request form, and the Chinese central government's approval-discussion also mentioned me as Little Min who is Fang-Wenhai's daughter. （就像你所听到的，第一笔美国公司汇出的1万美金是1967年7月22日已经电汇到达香港（我是1967年7月20日出生），在香港等了一个星期左右，等待中国政府的批准进入中国境内。中国政府是1967年7月31日开会讨论批准进入，就是周恩来总理没有对一万元表达反对意见的那次会议，这是2018年6月25日的广播剧所播出内容。我听说美国公司这第一笔电汇所填写的电汇表格上，我方敏的名字是中文书写。中国政府在一万美金批准进入的讨论中也是以方文海的女儿小敏称呼我。)
Hong Kong wire-recipient bank charged $1000 service fee to deliver it to Shanghai. Private assistant Yu's family suppose to continue the delivery to Nanjing to my parents or inform my parent to pick it up, Yu's family did neither. I have not heard the story of delivering from Hong Kong to Shanghai yet, other than the delivery person, a Hong Kong-born from the marriage, was mothered by one of my grandfather's 1930 romances. The mother's brief youth time romance with my grandfather was featured in the broadcasting episode on January 28th of 2018, her maiden family is an in-law to private assistant Yu.（香港电汇收件银行收了$1000美金“送钱费”将钱送往上海。上海于姓私人助理应该继续将钱送往南京或者通知我的父母去上海取款，于家是既没送钱到南京也没通知我的父母去上海拿钱。我还没听说有关前从香港到上海的故事，就只知道送钱的人是于家亲戚，是我爷爷30年代谈过恋爱的一个文艺女孩在结婚后和他丈夫在香港生下的儿子。我爷爷和这个母亲的短暂恋情就是2018年1月28日广播剧所播出的内容。）
I believe the American company did not stop the wire was for the best interest of mine. （我相信美国公司未停止汇款是出于对我最大利益的考量。）
----July 3rd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about enrolling to a college in Boston（听说了今天早上提到转入波士顿一家大学）.
My response: I need to respond to this none of my business matter is because of the confusion if this featured female was introduced to me. I am a woman, I refuse this kind effort of introducing a woman to me.（我的回应：我需要回应这和我毫不相干的事情，就是因为这女性是不是已经介绍给了我。我是个女的，我拒绝这种向我介绍女人的尝试和努力。）
I have been tolerating these Senior-youth's not-behaving activities from the Rockefeller house as much as I could all this time. It has been impressive that David Petraeus kept-on high-pitched voice yelling as if something so huge had ever happened, I have been kept on "what is wrong with you, can you sit quietly for a minute" toned.（我是一直都在包容洛克菲勒家的这一群老少年疯狂族。你就看那David Petraeus, 天天就尖着个嗓门的干嚎好像发生了什么天大的事，我一直的口气就是：“你发的这是什么神经，能不能就安静坐个一分钟？”)
This has puzzled so many people what is going on, Well, this is the difference between the inherited and the inheritable group. I am the head of my house ever since the inheriting, all these noisy Rockefellers are the allowance-taker inheritable group, the kinder garden group. So, other than asking my attorneys to go to their Seniors to demand my money back, or shitting back when I am girly, well, I am a youth in age and soon will be much more pretty than .., So, I have been tolerating as much as I could. （这让人多人都很奇怪这是怎么回事啊。唉，这就是继承了当一家之主了的一群和还在大树底下乘凉的一群之间的区别。我是自继承那天起就成了我这一支的一家之主了，而所有这些又吵又闹的洛克菲勒都是一群还在拿零花钱用用的幼儿园一族。所以，除了让我的律师找他们家当家的把我的钱给拿回来，小姐脾气来了就一顿痛骂之外，和他们比起来，我毕竟年纪上还是很轻是事实，我又很快又会变得漂亮很多也是真实，所以啊，我是尽量容让了。）
They are just so annoying. By the way, I did call law enforcement's help as well.（他们真是很烦人。顺便提一句，我还报警求助了。）
*I just started inquiring if my entrusting attorneys have also paid-out my education expenses according to July 1st of 2004's decision. This pay-in-full won't be in any scholarship but I am not certain if it is paid to any college because I don't remember if I mentioned any school in particular. It is just pay-in-full to cover my advance education expense. My parents may have possible fund allocated as well. (我刚开始寻找是否我的信托律师已经按照2004年7于1日的决定支付我的教育费用。这笔全部付清教育费不可能以奖学金形式给我，但我记不清我当时有没有对某一特定学校感兴趣，所以我不知这笔”全部付清“是付给了学校还是其他地方，就只是一笔付清而已，我父母可能也是类似）。
----July 3rd, 2018
07-02-2018 Some clarification on rIdiculous confusions from Mr. D Rockefeller Sr's family
Heard this morning's talk about a Mr. D Rockefeller Sr.
My response: I heard Mr. D Rockefeller Sr. passed away in recent years so I will do my best to be respectful in explaining myself.
I:) I inherited my own deceased birth Chinese grandfathers' Trusts on June 30th of 2004.
II:) The only person I met and had the romantic flirting conversations from the Rockefeller house is David Petraeus.
VI:) I never asked Mr. D Rockefeller Sr. nor his family to invest in anything I desire because I intended to invest my own inherited money in them all, as I said on July 1st of 2004: "All projects based on my ideas would be my own investments." In all 2004's meetings, I never asked for the favor to invest and I never asked for incentive referral fees for investment opportunities I created.
----July 2nd, 2018
07-01-2018 According to the United States Criminal Laws, using radio program to conduct sexual harassment is criminal activities. (按照美国刑事法律，通过广播剧实施性骚扰是美国的刑事犯罪行为）
Heard this morning's talk about the Chinese culture of "don't let go".（听说了今天早上提到中国的”不让走文化”。）
Myt response: The culture of "Don't let go" basically means stuck-on sexual harassment which never has been a part of the Chinese culture I was brought up with. In Chinese, we call the breed of this so-called culture "花痴"(pron: hua-chi, self-imagined-sexual-attraction-maniac).（我的回应：这种“不让走文化”就是性骚扰加跟踪“， 这种所谓的文化从来不是我所熟悉的中国文化的一部分。在中国，这种所谓文化的传承者是被称为“花痴精神病”的。）
This entire time, I have been complaining this radio program's producing team has at least one such "花痴(hua-chi)" staff because of the efforts to push the concept of "No a chance you don't want this or that butts desperately".（我就一直在说这个广播剧的制作团队里至少有一个这种花痴制作人员，因为这个广播剧的制作主题一直以来就是“只要是个屁股，全世界的听众就没可能不馋的口水嗒嗒的". ）
你不用天天以组织演出或制作广播剧编造情节来替真正有钱有势人痛骂方敏为借口，来找机会让你自己有机会可以舔真正有钱有势人的屌，可以有机会讨一份你自己想要的舔真正有钱有势的屌钱，吃真正有钱有势人的肛门屎钱。(You don't need to organize this show or that promotion to patch up stories to shit me to please the rich in order to advantage yourself for your own purpose to get the opportunity to suck the rich to beg your own so desired penis-sucking & asshole-licking money.)
----originally published on June 26th, 2018
----July 1st of 2018
Heard the confusion why I deserve this radio program's major featured person fee （听说了凭什么我拿主要角色费的疑问）.
My response: （我的回应：）
This radio program's commercial broadcasting my life experiences stories from myself's own creation is the reason I deserve the major featured person fee.（这个广播剧的商业播出我自己创作的我的人生经历故事是我凭什么该拿广播剧主要角色费的原因。)（updated on July 7th, /2018)
The major-featured-person fee and producing fee are both intellectual income. I did not participate in any producing efforts is the reason I share half-half with the producing team. The major featured person's share can be over 75% if participating in producing efforts while the producing team gets 25%.（主要角色费和制作费都是智慧产权收入。我没有参与任何制作努力是我和制作团队对半分的原因。如果参与制作，主要角色费所占比例可高达75%左右而制作团队只拿25%。）
The difference between the radio program's producing team and a fiction writer is the producing team reports my life stories as reality shows while a fiction writer writes own made-up stories based on original using made-up names but not reporting, the original personnel is unidentifiable and fiction stories are commonly understood as not real.（这个广播剧的制作团队和文学小说作家的区别就是，广播剧制作组是报道我的人生真实故事来制作真实剧，而一部小说的作家根据人物事件原型来编造小说人物名字从而进行创作来编造小说故事情节，原型人物在小说中已不可识别，小说故事情节被公众认可为既不是真实人物也不是真实事件报道而是虚拟文学创作。）
The difference between business idea's creator and the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising creative team and the advertising producing team. The creative business idea needs to be approved by the in-interest company, similar to advertising creative team's idea need to be approved by the advertising client, the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising producing team.（生意创意和公司生意执行团队的区别就像是广告创意团队和广告制作团队的区别。生意创意是需要对创意有兴趣企业的批准，就像是广告创意团队的创意是需要广告客户批准的一样，而公司生意执行团队就像广告制作团队一样。）
Be the identifiable truthful person, I have never been willing to be made-up upon or patch up upon fake or unreal stories of my life is the reason I have been constantly calling law enforcement's help on this radio program's sexual harassment efforts and public-harming my name efforts.（作为在现实生活中可辩别可识的真实人物，我从不愿意被人编造及编辑虚假不真实的所谓人生故事是我不停的就广播剧对我实施严重性骚扰并恶意故意破坏我方敏名誉而报警的原因。）
So far, I have been the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's illegal transferring out of my intellectual income, the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's organized severe sexual harassment since 2015, etc.（到目前为止，按照美国刑法，我是被广播剧非法转出我的智慧产权收入的受害人，从2015年起被广播剧重度性骚扰的受害人，等等。）
----July 1st of 2018
06-30-2018 我对于家一些故事的不理解 （What I don't understand about Yu's families)
听说了今天早上所谈的于家。（Heard this morning's talk about Yu's families)
我的回应：我听说的是于家1964年已经开始查询我爷爷在香港的钱财藏在哪里，1965年已在想办法将我爷爷的上海财产转入于家自己名下，我爷爷在1965年时在上海报警是我父亲的弟妹们可以顺利拿到我爷爷的遗嘱所分配家产的原因。(My response: I heard Yu's family had been sniffing around where Hong Kong money had been in 1964 and intended to transfer my grandfather's Shanghai money into Yu's family's bank account. My grandfather called Shanghai law enforcement was the reason my father's siblings inherited their inheritable according to my grandfather's wills.)
我听说的是我爷爷1965年向上海警方报警时不承认这位于姓私人助理的妻子是我爷爷自己的骨肉血脉小孩。我听说我爷爷1965年在向上海警方报警时一字未提香港信托。我听说于姓私人助理是从我父亲弟妹处得知我爷爷有钱放在了香港。(I heard my grandfather denied his fatherhood to the wife of his private assistant Yu in his account to the Shanghai law enforcement and he did not mention Hong Kong money at all. I heard the private assistant Yu heard about Hong Kong money from my father's siblings.)
我最近听说，根据DNA鉴定，我爷爷的于姓私人助理和我曾祖父的于姓保镖是亲生父子关系（听说两人不是户籍父子关系）。(I heard recently that my grandfather's private assistant was the biological son of my great grandfather's security Yu by DNA test result. I heard they were not legally registered as the father and son.)
这些都是可以通过当年警方的档案及DNA鉴定予以核实的，所有材料的真伪也都是可以做司法鉴定的。(All these should be able to be verified by the police records as well as the DNA test results, and the authentication of the documents can certainly be verified by forensics.)
我就是不太明白这个于姓私人助理为什么会和我爷爷要钱，为什么会将我爷爷的钱全算成他自己的，闹到我爷爷要报警的地步，于姓私人助理是个拿工资受雇佣的私人助理，怎么会去想我爷爷的钱？就像现在这个美国公司的事情，于家不屑解释他们当年凭什么扣留了我的生活费用却一再高调强调他们就是应该继续拿钱，凭什么呀？(I just don't understand this: Being an employed private assistant, a work relationship person to my grandfather, why private assistant Yu would demand my grandfather's wealth? why this private assistant would consider my grandfather's wealth to be his own so seriously enough that prompted my grandfather called Shanghai law enforcement's help? Why would he feel so comfortable he should want my grandfather's wealth? Just like current American Fund company's story, Yu's families have no need at all to explain why they detained my providing but strongly argue with emphasis that they should continually receive good money to be provided by the American company, why is this?)
但我也听说了我母亲的结婚礼物就是在1966年时由这个于姓私人助理送到了南京，只是我母亲没有拿到而已。(But I also heard my mother's wedding gift was sent to Nanjing to my mother by this same private assistant Yu in 1966, my mother did not receive it because of other reasons.)
我听说的是：我奶奶因为食物造成不适是被于姓私人助理发现后送进医院的，据说于家认为我们一家应该就此永远感恩不尽，可我奶奶进了医院就再没回家而是在医院去世了，没因为被于姓私人助理发现就捡了一条命活着回家，我奶奶没有因为于姓私人助理而活着回家，我们家凭什么就因为于姓私人助理拿着工资做了他该做的一份工作就应该对于家永远感恩不尽啊？(What I heard is: My grandmother was discovered and sent to the hospital by this private assistant Yu when my grandmother got food related discomforts. I heard Yu's families think my grandmother's family should appreciate this permanently forever, but my grandmother did not survive the discomforts but died in the hospital. It was not like my grandmother survived because this private assistant found her on time, the truth was my grandmother never left the hospital but died there. Why my grandmother's family should appreciate private assistant Yu so greatly and so forever because he was the one found her and did his paid-job to send her to the hospital during his paid working-time?)
我听说的是：我曾祖父的故事也是这个情况，因食物造成不适，由当时拿着保镖工资的于姓保镖发现而送医或者是叫了医生，隔夜就去世了。凭什么说我们就欠了于家的？(What I heard is: My great-grandfather was a similar story that he got food related discomforts, and he was discovered by the security Yu, and either sent to the hospital or called in a doctor by security Yu during security Yu's paid shift. My great-grandfather died overnight or so. Why my family owes this Yu's family because of this?)
我听说的是：我爷爷在1948年在香港办理信托后，就把上海大部分的财产放在了我奶奶的名字下面，我奶奶一住院，我爷爷就赶紧把钱转回他自己名下结果我奶奶还是去世了。(What I heard is: After my grandfather set up the Hong Kong Trust, my grandfather transferred the majority of his wealth to my grandmother's name. When my grandmother was hospitalized, my grandfather hurried to transfer the wealth back to his own name but seems did not save my grandmother.)
我就是不明白啊。就像昨天在广播剧里，于家就是一副已经很不耐烦的口气，好像是我在无理取闹才硬要说钱是我的，是美国公司在蛮不讲理才坚持不给他们于家想要的美国钱，可他们于家和美国公司一点关联都没有的，于家从来就不是什么投资人也不是什么生意往来户，于家就是个什么都不是。怎么就这么凶啊？(I just don't understand any of this. Just like yesterday's broadcasting, Yu's families sound like they are so fed up with all these already. as if I am being so annoying to insist on stating that is my money, the American company has been so ridiculous insist on not to continue providing them the money, but Yu's families got nothing to do with the American company, not investing associated nor business associated, basically is not associated at all. Why this tone?)
我爷爷在香港所设立信托的委托书里所指定的唯一受益人是我父亲的胎记掌纹支所生的胎记掌纹女，我是1967年出生有着和我父亲一摸一样的双掌胎记掌纹的他的掌纹女，是我父亲所生所育的他的骨肉女，是我父亲靠他自己的工资收入辛苦养大的他的亲生女，我方敏是我父亲唯一的女儿，我爷爷的掌纹儿子所生所育的唯一掌纹女。(My grandfather's settler's letter of the Hong Kong Trust entity stated that the sole beneficiary person should be the female-palm from his eldest son Fang, Wenhai‘s (方文海） palm-line. I was born in 1967 with birthmarks on my both palms exactly the same after my father, I am my father's own blood, I am my father's own girl he had raised by his hard-earned own making, I am my father's only biological daughter, my grandfather's birthmark son's only female birthmark-palms.)
06-06-2018 Rumors I heard about my family
----2018年6月30日。
06-29-2018 My inherited is part of my wallet that is never subject to spy (我的钱包包括我所继承的，从来都是不容盯梢）
Heard this morning's talk about one Rockefeller family's money confusion.（听说了今天早上谈到有关一个洛克菲勒家庭的钱困扰）
My response: I have no idea how come it became confusion after I left the meeting of July 1st, 2004. （我的回应：我就是不明白怎么2004年7月1日会议后这花钱的事怎么就变成了R家困扰。）
I only authorized David Petraeus' wife Holly on July 1st of 2004 to keep an eye on if her husband would pay for my glass house cancer treatment because the decision was I would pay it myself and she was employed by the medical treatment provider system in 2004. The fact that I could self-pay for my medical expense which was "well-known very expensive in 2004" should mean she would have no need to keep an eye on my daily living expenses and I was either a homeless or living on welfare before my medical expenses were paid since October(or November) of 2014. She was never authorized to spy on my wallet and she is no longer authorized to keep an eye on my medical spending on glasshouse cancer treatment as David Petraeus announced.（我在2004年7月1日那天只授权了David Petraeus的老婆Holly看着我的脑控癌治疗费用账户以确定是不是她自己的丈夫在替我付钱，这是因为在这授权之前就已经决定了这治疗费用会由我自己支付而她本人2004年当时又在提供治疗的医疗系统上班。只要我有能力自己支付在2004年当时公认很昂贵的脑控癌治疗费用是事实，就意味着她就应该没有任何需要盯着我的生活费用给付，而且在2014年10月或者11月我的脑控癌治疗开始付费前，我要么是没钱的流浪汉要么靠美国政府的救济综援生活。她从来未被我授权盯着我的钱包，她现在也没有我的授权也不再可以盯着我的医疗给付了，就如今天早上David Petraeus所说明的一样。）
A Chinese female's self-claim to voluntary spying on my wallet on July 1st of 2004 was understood by me as prostituting effort which I never had (and never will have) a penis to be responsive. My irresponsiveness never meant authorization but meant I am a female who doesn't have a penis to respond. I have and I will continuingly report any effort on spying my wallet to the law enforcement. My Trust entities I lawfully inherited are part of my wallet that is not subject for anyone to spy. （还有一个华人女子在2004年7月日当天声称自愿盯着我的钱包，我的理解是这个女人是在卖淫而我根本就没有男睾具可以回应。我当时的没有任何回应从来不是默许授权而是因为我是个女人根本就没有男睾具可以竖起来回应回应。我已经就我的钱包被莫名其妙的盯梢而报警处理，我今后就此报警也永远不会犹豫。我所合法继承的这些信托从来都是我私人钱包的一部分也从来不容盯梢。）
The rumors that the Senior couples would pay for my financial demands are ridiculous. David Petraeus' family has no reason to pay for any of my financial demands. I have requested tons such demands to my own entrusting attorneys & accountants, but never to the Senior couples of the Petraeus' family. （有关长者夫妻应该会为我的财务要求付费的传言真是莫名其妙。David Petraeus的家里没有任何理由为我的任何财务要求付费。我确实是提出了一堆的财务要求，但都是向我自己的信托律师及会计师提出，从来不是向David Petraeus家里的长者夫妻提出。）
----June 29th, 2018
听说了于家强烈表达他们没有责任义务向我谈他们当年如何使用所扣押款项。（Heard Yu's families expressed their annoyedness strongly that they are not responsible to explain anything to me.)
我的回应：(My response:)
于家有责任义务向美国或者中国执法相关机构谈他们当年为何非法扣押我的生活费用给付及如何使用该款项， 我作为于家当年非法扣押生活费款项事件的受害人会实事求是的向美国执法机关说明 1：特殊年代， 2：时间久远。(Yu's families are responsible to explain to the law enforcement from the United States' or the People's Republic of China on why they illegally detained my living expenses providing and how they spent the detained money. Being the victim of their illegal detention of my living expense providing, I will truthfully explain to the law enforcement of the United States that 1: 1967 was the year of Chinese Red Guards culture revolution time, 2: It has been a long time and my growing up has been smooth.)
我需要强调于家扣押我的生活费用海外汇款从来不是于家的什么合法权利，也从来不是因为我爷爷方智仁或者我的曾祖父母（方智仁的父亲母亲）欠了他们于家什么。(I need to emphasize the detention of my living expenses providing has never been Yu's families' lawful rights nor their privileges, and it was never because of any debts owed by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren nor my from my great-grandparents (Fang, Zhiren's parents.)
我所听说的是：于姓私人助理的丈母娘和我爷爷方智仁从未有过任何恋爱关系，于姓私人助理的妻子也从来不是我爷爷的血脉骨肉。于姓私人助理是在我父亲方文海1949年当兵之后才成为我爷爷的私人助理的。 1961年时我爷爷支付于姓私人助理每月的工资是￥196.00元人民币。(What I have heard are: Private assistant' Yu's mother-in-law never had any romance with my grandfather Fang, Zhiren, private assistant Yu's wife was never my grandfather's own blood. Mr. Yu became my grandfather's private assistant was after my father joined the Chinese Army in 1949. The wage my grandfather paid to this private assistant Mr. Yu in 1961 was￥196.00 per month which was $196.00 because the exchange rate was $1 U.S.dollar = ￥1 RMB in 1961.)
我个人认为于家今天的表态是因为我昨天的博文强调了于家和该汇款美国公司没有任何关联后，这表态其实是于家想和该美国公司搭上关系的努力。当年的每笔汇款，从1967年7月第一笔汇款开始，都是通过香港中介银行转送往上海，直到1996年我离开中国后停止汇款，于家从不清楚汇款美国公司的任何情况,于家就只知道在1996年10月以后就再没收到过汇款。(My personal opinion, Yu's families expression today was because my blog article stated that they never had any association with the American company who wired the money, this expression was out of the efforts that intended to create a communication channel with the American company to have some association. All these wires had been through a Hong Kong media bank to redirect to Shanghai since the first wire in July of 1967 till the wire stopped immediately after I left China in October of 1996. Yu's families never knew anything about the wiring American company this entire time, Yu's families just knew there had been no wire after October of 1996.)
----2018年6月29日。
06-28-2018 Those no-money Fang's offspring should accuse their own grandfathers instead of swearing about me (那些没钱的方家后人应该去指责他们自己的爷爷而不是对我谩骂)
听说了今天早上方家后人对我的中文谩骂。(Heard this morning's swearing from Fang's offspring)
06-27-2018 Laws are at work already, Just listen to the radio program (法律已经在工作，你就听广播剧吧）
Laws are at work already to ensure the freedom of speech does not mean confusing
(法律已经在工作：言论自由创作自由都不容混淆法律上的是非真相）
Heard this morning's talk of the confusion about tax laws. (听说了几天早上提到有关税法的困扰)
My response: I heard which certainly means may not be accurate, that according to the United States tax laws, the investor tax is paid when the money is transferring out of the investment for personal usage. So, it is lawful for a U.S. citizen investor not to reveal the total size or detailed size of any combination of investments as an investor. But by law, an investor needs to report the actual amount of the money being transferred out of the investment purpose at the same time of the transferring. (我的回应：我听说也就是说不一定准确啊，按照美国法律，投资人税是在投资款项被转出投资目的用于非投资目的时支付。所以，投资人是美国公民的话，是可以合法不公开投资综合及项目细节。但是按照法律，一个投资人必须在款项转出投资目的时如实汇报转出投资用途的款项数额。）
If so, what will happen if there is any unlawful investment activity? The law enforcement enforcing laws by tracking down who is the investor of the discovered unlawful activity. (那如果有非法投资活动哪？一旦发现非法活动，警方执法是倒追谁是该非法活动的投资人。）
My Trust entity has been registered as an entity for investment and I am a U.S. citizen, so it is lawful to refuse to reveal any investment activities of my Trust entity. （我的信托是注册为投资目的法人机构, 我又是美国公民，所以拒绝公开我的信托的投资活动是合法权利。）
I heard this morning's anger was because the insist-on request for a Spanish company's accounting information was from an American who is never associated to the Spanish company in any way.（我听说今天早上的愤怒是因为坚持要求西班牙的一家公司的提交该公司业务账目信息的这个美国人和西班牙的这家公司是一点关联都没有。）
----June 27th, 2018
Heard about this morning's confusion from the Mr. "Amusing Incident".（听说了今天早上还在困扰中的“乌龙事件”主角）
My response: It sounds like the Mister is still confused. It is not a surprise if you heard how confused some Miss Os and some Mister Os are, I heard they are still really confused.
（我的回应：听起来这先生还困扰着那。不过你要是听说了有几个O家先生O家小姐还在怎么样的多么的困扰着，你就一点都不觉得奇怪了。）
I heard the family confusion of Mr. "Amusing Incident" was clarified according to laws in the radio program for a four-days-time between June 7th of 2018 -June 10th of 2018, and June 11th-14th of 2018 broadcasting was the "freedom of speech" of what else has been confusing to them after the 4-days major clarification according to the laws. What you heard today is the impact of what else has been so confusing. It won't be surprising if there is something else still very confusing. Just listen to the radio program.
（我听说“乌龙”先生家的困扰在法律上的澄清是广播剧2018年6月7日-10日的四天的播出内容，2018年6月11日-14日是“乌龙先生”家里还在为什么而困扰的"言论自由的表达”，你今天听到的就是在那四天依据法律进行的大体上的事件澄清之后，这个"乌龙“先生还在困扰什么所造成的后果/。这当然是一点都不奇怪啊，听众就继续听广播剧的”下回分解”吧。）
I believe laws are already at work on the radio program's producing. Being the majorly impacted major-featured-person of this radio program, I did keep on calling law enforcement's help as well to make sure the radio program is reporting these types of important matters, not scripting nor patching-up and nor over-writing after the lawful clarification.
（我相信法律已经在进行广播剧制作相关的执法工作。作为受广播剧影响最大的广播剧主要人物，我也一直在报警求助警方保障广播剧是在就这些重要内容进行报道而非编纂编辑内容，或者试图事后改写依据法律所做的真相澄清。）
Freedom of speech, granted by the United States' Constitution, is the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint. Freedom of speech is the right to verbally express, never the right to verbally take over any format of any physically existing entity nor any financial valuables.（美国人的言论自由是由美国宪法赋予美国公民的权利。言论自由的权利是可以不受压制不受限制的用语言来表达的权力， 从来不是用语言来夺取合法被其他人所拥有的任何物质存在及任何财产财务的权利。）
06-07-2018 Amusing incident （乌龙事件）
----June 27th, 2018
听说了于家就是没法明白。（Heard Yu's families are so confused)
我的回应：我现在还在听究竟于家是个什么故事。(My response: I am still listening exactly what has been the story.)
于家认为他们当年可以把钱留下，该美国公司既没有追究也没停止付款，就已经表明了于家就是应该继续拿钱。Yu's families think the American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop wiring the money the entire time fully aware of Yu's families had kept all the wired money to themselves should mean granting Yu's families to own the money.
该美国公司其实对此已经说的很清楚. (The American company already clarified this clearly:)
----2018年6月27日。
06-26-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
I, Min Fang, never demand any living male's penis money, and I never receive any penis money nor voluntary compensation for any sort of abusiveness. It is well-known no-secret to the entertainment industry since July of 2004 that "there was never any prominent penis associate to this radio program" to confuse anyone as if I have been the major featured person from any penis business.
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
7： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
----最早发布于2018年5月23日。
06-25-2018 Chinese Premier Zhou and my $10, 000 monthly providing (中国的周恩来总理和我每月一万元的生活费用给付）
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese Premier Zhou.
My response: The reason why only one line of harsh saying "Premier Zhou is childless" was broadcasted is possibly to imply I am the similarly, but I do have my biological children.
I heard the producer of this line was Jessica O'Connor who mothers a Miss Ford, the 2013 presented girl who tends to fall into sleep holding her father's sleeve. The problem this Jessica O'Connor with me is the same problem a "Matilda Shimmel" has with me, but surely none of my business problem.
Jessica O'Connor has a daughter identically resembles another Miss Ford who is one of the four children broadcasted as all mothered by a British but a pair resembles the birth father's cousin. The confusion is the cousin don't resemble each other, the trick is they both partially resemble their great-great-great-great-great grandfather to the extreme.
So, whatever the birthfather's family have explained about the birth mother, this Jessica O'Connor just won't listen. I have screamed in my apartment a lot to say that my daughter, published in 2012, resembles me to the obvious, not her farther-side anyone nor O'Connor anyone. I hope someone can help her to get this.
----June 25th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到中国的周恩来总理和毛泽东主席开会的会议记录。
我的回应：
首先，
我实在是太荣幸了，周恩来总理和毛泽东主席他们两个是我最推崇的中国共产党人。我对他们的军事才华，文学功底甚至他们的书法都实在是太崇拜了。不过我不认同他们对1949年前还只是初级资本主义时期生产力还不发达的中国只需要大众一心就已经可以实现天下大同没有财富差别的这种理念，我认为“打土豪分田地”只是无为拆塔并不能促进创造与建设，聚沙成塔以拥有足够财力为人民为大众谋福利只需通过促进生产力以实现在税务法律法规管理下的应缴税基数提高就可以实现。
我自己的财产我自己管理就很好，永远不需要中国政府干涉我作为美国公民的合法私有财富。
其次，
我今天早上的原话是“周恩来是断子绝孙的，（他的观点再吓人都不会被认为是为了谋私利），你们现在是把中国的十三亿人民都当成是断子绝孙的”，你们才会认为别人都应该顶礼膜拜你们可以性交生孩子的能力，否则怎么才十三，十四岁的女孩不学好不务正业，满大街的可以到处屁股被人摸，又违反国家计划生育政策，才十几岁的初高中生在中学读书期间就未婚生了一个孩子，大学就读期间又生了两个让别人养着还没被按照中国国家政策退学，这些怎么成了你们中华人民共和国这一届政府所宣传的对中华人民共和国以及对13亿中国人民最大的贡献了？***现任国务院总理的老婆在读书期间生三个孩子，婚后三次足月怀孕只在医院产一女是海外传言。
我拒绝相信你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员。我拒绝你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员对我的敲诈勒索要求。我自己的财产我自己管理就很好。
我认为你们这些所谓的中国国家政府工作人员要是能把中国国库的钱也就是13亿中国人民的国库款项管理成为不是一个男女性交成果奖励金的金库，你们就已经是很好很有才华很清楚什么是人民的利益这么一群政府工作人员了。我确实是从心眼里认为你们根本就是一群娼妓院的娼妓加婊子养的才会认为中国十三亿人民的国库甚至我作为美国公民的合法私有财产是会为你们的性交乱操付费的。
第三：
至于为什么只播出那一句“断子绝孙”，那是为了影射我， 是因为一个Jessica O’Connor小姐（一个福特孩子妈）认定我女儿和她的女儿共一个爹，就因为她孩子爹有个堂兄弟的女儿和她的小孩长得像亲姊妹。2012年发表的我的女儿影视录像已经很明显呈现了她长得像我不像爹。那个女孩的亲爹也已经在广播剧上说明了那个女孩的亲妈是个英国女人。这个O家小姐似乎就是不准我有自己亲生小孩的意思，根本就是一个变态精神病类似。
第四，
就今天早上的毛周两个人的谈话内容是否和我有关，得看这是什么时候的谈话。那一万美金的生活费用是在中国政府同意后才由香港汇入中国， 中国政府知情是确定的。但我是这家公司的投资机构（信托）的唯一受益人这个事实只有在我出生后才能确定，所以这一万美金的生活费用汇入是在我1967年7月20日出生后才向中国政府提出的申请。
今天早上的广播剧据说是由周恩来的“私生子”在畅谈，说其实是周恩来不准这汇入的一万元钱归我方敏所拥有，说其实是因为周恩来想把这钱给他自己的“亲生孩子”，也就是说这是在由周恩来总理自己的“亲生孩子”通过广播剧来向全国世界人民公开说明周恩来总理从来就不是什么全心全意为人民的好总理而是个专谋私利的乌龟王八蛋。
我会认为周恩来确实会认为我一个小孩在他们心目中的理想国度里出生怎么还需要私人拥有财产而非公共拥有，这对于共产主义理想的不同理解也是美国和中国当时没有外交关系的原因，所以不足为奇。但我相信周恩来是不会认为别人把这一万元钱拿走作为私人使用就是应该的。
----2018年6月25日。
06-24-2018 Inheriting Tax && 究竟是文艺演出还是严重违法违宪活动？
Heard this morning's talk of my inheriting tax.
My response: Yes, my Trusts were not eligible for the estate tax (I was a foreigner inheriting foreign settlers' trusts), and Connecticut state I was a resident of was having tax free for AA type (grandparents-grandchild) inheriting on June 30th of 2004, so, this inheriting tax would be willingness-based inheriting tax paying.
I was told I could do this willingness-based tax paying on the inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004, but I was too excited that I could save inheriting tax so I answered happily: "why would I ever pay tax when I don't have to."
So, it is now.
----June 24th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到了就是要我付钱。
我的回应：我拒绝今天早上向我提出的要钱要求。我就是要提醒这个女的，我没有男睾具，不会觉得你说这些话很讨喜，就只觉得你很烦人很讨厌。
我现在真是很烦，整个所谓中国演出，根本就是编造故事以讹诈，欺诈和敲诈，并借此制造中国13亿人民对我方敏个人的误解不满以煽动针对我方敏个人的仇恨和敌视。
最著名的例子就是所谓的我欠了中国人民解放军军费一亿多人民币或者美金。最早这是一个文艺演出编纂的故事，说的是中国人民解放军的一个军人因工伤被送往美国军队予以治疗，然后就说要我付钱，但因是因公负伤，我又是美军退役军官（真实）在美国生活了已经20年，美军很清楚我和中国军方没有任何私人往来且没有任何法律依据应该由我付帐，所以在这个故事里，美军就把账单给了中国人民解放军，中国人民解放军也把帐给付了。结果，后续的所谓演出就变成了凭什么中国军费这么花费，就应该算成是我欠了中国人民解放军军费，并因此煽动了13亿中国人民就是要我还钱的呼声，你说这是文艺演出，还是制造仇恨事端以实施讹诈欺诈和敲诈勒索？
我破口痛骂中国政府从2015年开始有组织进行的文艺演出的原因就是因为所有这些文艺演出都是至少是涉嫌严重违法违宪侵犯我的法律权益及基本人权的行为。
这场所谓文艺演出的主题就是"你他妈的你以为你自己是谁?", 基本大纲就是只准痛骂我方敏是个单身女人独自生活就是个已经被事实证明了的没人要的东西，只准我方敏去捡垃圾否则不准有口饭吃，不准我方敏花我自己的钱，不准我方敏有我自己的生活，不准我方敏说话，就是不准，就是不准，就是不准。
这还是文艺演出啊？美国方面参与支持这个演出的的一些人也是被我向美国警方指控严重性骚扰及敲诈勒索谋财害命。
有人说我应该向中国政府解释就不会这样了。解释什么? 我是因为脑控癌没有隐私所以一个人在美国麻州波士顿生活，中国政府应该很清楚我是一个人生活且已经居住美国20年了，什么时候开始单身华裔女人就成了中国政府应该组织人力物力进行谩骂羞辱的？这届中国北京中央政府究竟是一个犯罪团伙的组织机构还是一个法制国家的政府啊？
我就是说这根本是一群北京老娼妓的做法，只要是条男睾具他们就是够资格闹吃醋，这不是一群街上的骚母狗根本实在弄不清这条那条男睾具根本就不是捅过了他们的那条，还能是什么呀？也可能他们是男睾具共用也就是共妻共睾主义，或者这条那条男睾具是个公用睾具，反正结果就是只要一个给捅过那是一群都够资格闹吃醋。我的结论就是这一群一伙的不是一群老娼妓就是一伙老黄脸老骚母狗给骚成了精神病黄脸老骚母狗。
至于说我花了R家很多钱就是该被他们家的女人痛骂并把我的钱拿光的说法，我的解释是我是2017上半年在波士顿96.9FM广播电台上时才听说R家认为我2004年7月1日花的是R家的钱且是未经许可并利用公共场合进行勒索，我对此的公开回应当时就已经是我方敏从来没有花过R家的钱，我方敏2004年7月1日花钱当时就没开口跟R家要过或者问一声R家愿不愿意为我花钱，我在花我自己刚继承的钱，我问R家干嘛？我事后就没打过一个电话给R家要求R家任何人支付我的生活费用，我方敏也从来就不知道R家的银行账号信息，怎么花R家的钱？ 更何况R家开的支票都是一些对娱乐业的投资项目像是百老汇歌舞剧以及街道医院等等，都是目前已知已经赚钱的投资。2004年7月1日那天非投资性的开销也就是我以及我的父母子女的医疗保安给付及我现在一直在找的我的生活费给付，都是我自己所继承的信托予以支付的开销。所谓我花了R家很多钱的误会目前都已经一切由我的律师予以处理了。可这和中国政府有什么关系啊？
还有一个误会，我是今年才听说，就是在2004年7月1日我快乐告知众人我继承了大笔财产时，有人好奇问我究竟是谁给我的钱，我回答说是我爷爷的，但我没被告知是那一代的爷爷，所以我当时就开始扳手指头数一数究竟可能是哪个爷爷，才数了5代爷爷，就被“勒令”停止，说我贪得无厌五个（男人）还不够，我当时就没闹明白，还傻傻回答“好像不太够”。那是，这些公司在美国就已经400年了，至少是十代以前的爷爷给我的。我就是因此被海外华裔社区骂了十几年的婊子破鞋，今年（2018年）才听说就因为我当时是在数手指头。我能解释什么？
----2018年6月24日。
06-23-2018 Boston's Park Street Church and 1989's Chinese students' movement
Heard about this morning's Boston's Park Street Church and 1989.
My response: Boston's Park Street Church is not a Catholic church, and I was never a patron visitor of the Boston's Park Street Church but a "homeless of its street-level open balcony" who never in any situation having an opportunity to introduce myself or to mention any name from the New York City, I was just the anonymous Chinese homeless who has a show on the radio with a name of Min Fang.
I have no idea why of this morning's anxiety and whom it regards, but I have been complaining of this organized "paid to shit" scheme since November of 2015 when the famous British Crown Prince and his famous wife started to patch up stories how I had intruded their private life in London of United Kindom of Britain when I was a "homeless" or a resident of the public housing in Boston, Massachusetts of the United States. I have accused the organizer of this "paid to shit" scheme Albert Gore has been intended to Murder for Money, I am wondering other than the intellectual income this Albert Gore had stolen from me and others with invalid "Judge's ruling", where this payment to "shit me all over" should be expected from?
I heard 1989's students' movement was supported by this big group of participants of this "paid to shit" scheme, was I blamed for being the person who advised not to put tons of Chinese people into financial desperation in that special economic transition time of the 1980s? Why is this?
Does this group ever think from their own election system that free election does not mean the blindfold election that well-informed voters are absolutely necessary to have the fair election to choose a candidate from the expectation out of knowing who the candidate is and what the candidate can do for the voters? Does this group know these well-informed voters need to be informed by a system which can't be achieved overnight by the college students marching on the streets?
Does this group know when streets were blocked, there were tons of business in this situation may go bankrupt and 1989's China did not have the social welfare system to support the jobless, nor an open labor market to find a job? A bankrupt business in 1989 means the entire staff of the business would not have a single penny income for the rest of their lives to buy any food nor to support their families? China had started some policies to allow private small business in the 1980s was to ease this financial desperation situation that caused by the China's economic system transmitting fron the planned economy to the market economy, why this group still think as such today that this big population (6%) of Chinese people's potential financial desperation meant nothing at all to them to wish to severe it?
I was wondering why this group want the People's Republic of China to have such a government as the current administration who are famous now for their "Don't serve the People but get paid to enjoy the excessive powers & special privileges that never granted by the People's Republic of China's Constitution", why this group enjoy to see so much anger from the 1.3Billion Chinese People instead of their happy spirits?
I heard this group may say their understanding of letting Chinese people happy is to make my life bankrupt as they have participated, I say how do they know it is the Chinese 1.3 Billion People who want to kill me in order to have some money only worth their several months' salary each? Why this group would fancy that the Chinese people are not the hard working people willing to make their own money as they always have been?
Like I have pointed out, a creator of a movie is different with a producer, a director, or a scriptwriter, it is the same in a country's governing. The public posts are policymakers, the Congress is lawmakers, and the government employees are administrative & executive groups of the laws and policies.
Why I have been denied for who I am when my contributions to China such as Megacity subways, covered Green Farms, desert developing, etc are all originally my creative thoughts to benefit Chinese people which inspired these regional economic projects that have been administered by the local, provincial and central government of the People's Republic of China?
Exactly who is fighting this title of thought-creator of these economic projects from the People's Republic of China government?
----June 23rd, 2018
06-22-2018 我和华裔社区的矛盾究竟是什么（1）
听说很多听众认为我和波士顿的中国城超市一定矛盾很大。
我的回应：我也很奇怪他们怎们那么愤怒。
我就从来没去找过他们讨价还价，更不用说找经理人员聊天要折扣，也就是去买买菜，也就是柜台上放什么买什么。我现在还很少买菜，有将近1-2年很少买菜了，我这一两年不是外食就是买一次混几个星期这种。除了他们说的"非的拿光”是指我会买光摆放在货架上待卖的我喜欢的蔬果外，也就是“好东西都给我买走了”之外，实在不知道他们愤怒的是什么。以前在平价超市我是经常和一些站在旁边看我会不会“偷东西”的所谓华人顾客发生冲突，也因此和其经理部门关系紧张，但这种情形很少发生在这个中国城超市连锁。不过，平价超市现在已经是这个中国城超市连锁店的一部分了。
至于说到我自称是其投资人，他们是可以通过内部财会系统核实的。我所继承的信托在美国的基金公司(就是美国“Pejoves”基金公司）是一家专门投资的基金公司，对福特汽车的投资就已经至少是”爷爷级”啦，对中国的福特汽车更是至少是个“曾祖父级”，因为中间可能有个公司叫福特国际公司甚至还有一个福特亚洲公司。对波士顿中国城超市连锁可能是通过其他贸易公司的超市投资之类的且很有可能是至少4-5代的“曾祖父”级投资，能有什么矛盾？我那有可能没有任何凭据就到他们柜台上去要求现金给付？我还没经常去买菜他们就已经如此公开表达愤怒，还会因为莫名的害怕而不敢报警啊？
我就是奇怪他们哪来的那么多看不惯，我有钱还是没钱能有他们什么事啊？是谁就是这么看不惯，就是能有怎么大的愤怒这么响亮的声音啊？何况他们表达愤怒的广播剧就是以我为主要人物播出我的故事都已经有十几年了，按照美国的劳工法都没有可能没有一个子儿，哪里会需要他们看不惯我不肯打餐馆工挣口便宜饭吃啊？他们的超市是应该有律师懂法律的。他们也在麻州波士顿，他们是可以查询我作为麻州居民是否已经就我的广播剧收入向麻州总检察长办公室报警的。我2007年一月从电脑咨询员工作岗位辞职，当时的摩根大通银行同事就没人认为奇怪，就是因为广播剧是从2005年1月起就已经开播当时已经两年了，我那里还会需要做工拿一份工资吃饭啊。
我是自个瞎猜啊，凭我自己的亲身经历，一定是有人在他们的超市里搅混水想闷钱。借口这个借口那个，愤怒这个愤怒那个，这个就是不行那个就是不行，其实都是在忙着想收银箱里的钱。否则哪有那么大的需要对一个难的去买菜的我表达如此强烈如此被众所认可的“极大愤怒”啊？
我昨天去买菜，也是一路被人觉得滑稽，我估计是所谓的“最穷的富豪来了”特别滑稽。我当时已经是筋疲力尽了，所以只想买东西走人。美国麻州波士顿大学真的很多，生物工程研究的很多，所以知道我的脑控癌治疗情形的人也很多。我还真是没吹牛，广播上讲的我每天的治疗费用预算可能也不是瞎编，我自己确实不知道数额多少，但我确定是我自己在付钱治疗。我现在很少买菜也很少外食也是因为治疗，现在所谓的自动感染已经不是问题，就是累得不得了。
----2018年6月22日。
昨天在广播里表达愤怒不满的是我刚来美国时的纽约曼哈顿Jennifer的女儿。
我的回应：我就是在这个Jennifer夫妻俩的公寓房里于1996年认识了Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford). Jennifer 的这个女儿已婚不和父母同住是Jennifer当年可以收留我入住的原因。我是最近才听说了她母亲Jennifer的离世，希望他们一家一切都好。
认识Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford) 当时只有我和Jennifer在场，但我认识的这个人是个福特就是这个女儿发现的，所以昨天是由这个女儿在广播剧上说明我没有可能会和福特家的任何人有任何关系。我本人不清楚真相但也不是太在乎我自己的亲生孩子是否和福特这个名字有血缘上的关系。Like I said, I understood "the same size as Rockefellers" I was told on June 30th of 2004 as "With that s appended (not certain if appended or 's), I am a Rockefeller richer who is much wealthier than a Ford", why would I care?
至于她的愤怒可能和她被广播剧于2011年前后宣布而无奈离开她所喜欢的银行工作可能有关， 但我不是太清楚广播剧如此宣布的原因是什么。
至于这个女儿提到她很难理解我完全不珍惜她母亲Jennifer当年对我的收留，我的解释是我自1997年搬离他父母在曼哈顿的公寓以后就因为我自己工作学习忙碌，很难有完整的时间可以去经常探视她父母，从未单独和她父亲联络过，从来都是如有联络，都是只拨打电话给Jennifer本人就可以。但她母亲Jennifer于2004年6月中旬我探视她父母的时侯，在她父母与我聚餐的饭桌上当着她父亲的面莫名其妙的表达她母亲Jennifer自己很担心我会勾引她父亲，这是我从那天起就不可能和她父母再有任何联络的原因。
我是1999年9月起就已经是4-5万年薪的电脑程序员工作，H1签证，2004年绿卡申请的劳工卡就已经批准了，2005年4月就已经取得正式绿卡。我自2015年起就已经是美国公民了，通过工作移民取得，所以不会需要通过婚姻而拥有美国居民的合法身份，也不会需要和她及她的父亲取得联系。
我不是太清楚这是她本人表达还是广播剧制作效果，但我确实不会出于任何需要而和他们一家取得任何联系，他们一家帮不了我什么。
----2018年6月22日。
06-21-2018 那一片960万平方公里土地是一个共和国还是已经私家实质拥有？
听说了今天早上提到的有关“私人认可却拥有实质上事实上的公权力”。
我的回应：我也持同样的观点。我在这个博客上痛骂的就是我一直以来的观点。
你自己没有能力，你就说你自己没有能力领导中国，你别说13亿人民里面就没有任何人有能力可以领导中国了，非得由你来当国家领导人，非得由你的男睾具来任命你唯一认可的女人性器官作为才是可以够资格有能力凭着你的睾具特别欣赏这么一个现实状况就必须让这个女性因为她自己的性器官就可以拥有实质上甚至事实上的只有13亿人民才能赋予的国家领导人公权力。
“没有办法”，“你说能怎么办”从来不是什么有领导能力者的语言和无奈表达，何况中国共产党始终强调的都是中国共产党对中国的集体领导，而非一些男女共产党员通过男女性交来实现对中国的集体领导。
我认为只要那960万平方公里土地还是或者说至少还是在号称是中华人民共和国的领土领海和领空，并不是私人可以传承的，就不应该由利益紧密相连的以一女对多男类别的性交关系组合来实现实质上事实上的性交集体来领导统治管理13亿人民的现实状态。
*共和国的定义：
共和政治的基本含义就是，国家和政府是公共的，而不是私人的，国家和政府应当为公共利益而努力，而不应当为私人利益而奋斗。共和政治的另一个基本含义是，国家各级政权机关的领导人不是继承的，不是世袭的，也不是命定的，而是由自由公正的选举产生的。因而，公正而自由的选举，是判断一个国家是否真正实行共和政治的又一基本准则。
（定义来源：https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD/579415 ）
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
----2018年6月21日。
听说了有关“为什么方敏对于昨天美国军方的正式宣布不是特别敏感？”
我的回应：我和美国军方所宣布的R家当事人没有任何职业上工作上及金钱上的任何依附关系，双方私人财产从来都是独立，昨天美国军方的正式宣布是强调双方没有任何私人交往关系。
R家的财产是在1900年前后在美国开始发展兴旺，我所继承的信托是在1600年前后开始在美国投资茁壮成长并见证了美国这边土地由移民（殖民*）垦荒变成了美利坚合众国的历史。 双方财产没有重叠但有由专业经理人员进行的公司合作投资关系，我本人没有也不会直接参与公司的投资业务及经营管理。
*殖民和移民的区别：移民的国籍及人口管理随移居而改变。1776年独立以前的美国只是一片土地可以移居，但没有国家政府及人口管理，所以移居人口没有国籍的改变被称为殖民。
----2018年6月21日。
06-20-2018 Why radio program has been so destructive? (为什么这个广播剧就是要砸，要毁坏？）
Heard this morning's U.S. military's announcement.
My response: I heard it is requested and it is official.
----June 20th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why this radio program is so destructive.
My response: I don't know what really happened but I have understood the destructiveness regarding who I am has been intentional and led by the central government of the People's Republic of China.
The Chinese community abroad, especially the Chinese mainland, join this destructive effort to self-promote own local advantages is my assumption.
I have already denounced myself from the Chinese community abroad.
I have announced I already I have no association with the People's Republic of China.
----June 20th, 2018
听说了今天早上美国军方的宣布。
我的回应：我听说这是应当事人要求宣布的，是正式宣布。
----2018年6月20日。
听说了今天早上提到广播剧为何就是要砸了要毁了我的一切。
我的回应：我不清楚事实真相是什么，对于通过广播剧及其推广活动，对我个人所进行的打砸毁灭等一切努力，我一直都理解为这一切都是故意有意所为，都是在中华人民共和国北京中央政府的领导下进行。
海外华裔社区，特别是海外大陆移民社区广泛参与这些针对我个人的打砸毁灭活动，我推测是为了拔高他们自己在海外当地的地位。
我已经宣布我不属于海外华裔社区。
我已经宣布我和中华人民共和国没有任何关系。
----2018年6月20日。
从2015年中国北京政府的态度公开化开始，就一点都不奇怪当初我爷爷决定留在中华人民共和国是否有可能让我爷爷，我父亲和我成为了中国北京政府的监视对象，很明显我们家从来不受中国北京政府欢迎。如果这是事实，我也不需要躲躲闪闪的而是直接公开指出这一点事实。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府告知方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人是真实，我方敏是1996年离开中国的，我现在已经是美国公民了。我方敏是否有政治立场已经和中华人民共和国及海外华裔社区没有任何关系， 请不要以任何借口认为我方敏没有中华人民共和国或者海外华裔社区就难以生存以避免不必要的误会。我方敏会捍卫我方敏自己作为美国公民的合法权利和利益，我方敏也绝不会就此犹豫妥协。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府或海外华裔社区广为告知我方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设
----2018年6月20日。
06-19-2018 华人世界的困扰 （The anger of "Why Americans only willing to give me money, not other former or current citizens from the same People's Republic of China")
My explanation: This or that money is from this Trust or that Trust that I inherited, never from the American people, nor the American companies, nor the U.S. government.
06-18-2018 Why the lawful ownership means nothing just because "the deserved money-wanter is announced on the radio"?
Heard this morning's cry and child talk.
My response: I heard this "Jessica O'Connor" is one of the mothers of "the British-broadcasting announced six children", a "Matilda Shimmel" is another one.
Nothing new of this morning's intensified clarification from the agitated leftover-sucker of the crying one.
I have absolutely nothing to do with all above patrons at all. The only reason for this group to have this broadcasting is to deny the fact I do have my biological children who got nothing to do with this group biologically.
I heard this Jessica O'Connor's child is a girl who was born in mid-2010 as well. I don't know how cheap this Jessica O'Connor can be that she needed to compete with a surrogate mother, but I don't need a child to get my living expenses provided. So, I have no such children nor such child biologically associated with this morning's featured any patron.
Basically, this morning's broadcasting is to say I am not allowed to have any biological children or child because this Jessica O'Connor said so. But she may be just a woman who needs a child to get some money, why I need her permission when I am a financially independent wealthy female who should be disgusted by leftovers?
This malicious intention to deny my life to potentially abusively harmful to my biological children through this effort of building up this public denial from the biologically irrelevant group, this maliciousness intention is the reason I called law enforcement's help on this morning's broadcasting.
I already noticed, the technique-in-use is to untie my biological children with me through this public media propaganda and possibly intended to tie their own biological child or children with my inherited wealth through this building up the public impression efforts, to achieve the purpose to abuse me together with my biological children in order to take over my wealth through the public confusion.
This technique-in-use is the reason I accused the organizer intends to murder for money because I would be the one in the way for them to get my money once the public gets so confused who owns what money.
The entire efforts of this broadcasting are to impress the public that lawful ownership of the money means nothing at all, the deserved money-wanters who have the control of this public media are the patrons who should have the money because "it is announced so loudly on the radio".
So, some said, "but you don't look like you have any money in Boston of Massachusetts, and you don't sound like you have any money on the radio as well, why you keep saying you have money and wealth?"
For one, why you think there are so many efforts and necessities are needed to tell the public I have no money when it is obvious that I have no illegal means to access any money? Why it is so impressive that I have been obviously hunted on the radio and in my daily residential living in Boston of Massachusetts?
I say I am wealthy is because I lawfully own what I have announced on this web blog. My announcements about my wealth are not accurate but all lawful according to laws of the United States, the United Kingdom of Britain, the People's Republic of China and etc.
02-01-2018 Happy to be the person that not Stuck-in there
----June 18th, 2018
Regarding the proud "as long as you are fuching, A woman deserves to come to your house to fuch the penis to get your money."
My response: This proud has been since 2004, supported by the People's Republic of China's prostituting gang grouped government and some prominent American rich or associated powerful home-pussy. I was so shocked to learn the rich of being so proud to be able to afford to have some home-pussy.
I say as long as that penis is my leftover and it is from the penis' own willingness, why would I ever care? But I won't hesitate to call 911 to drag both of you out of my any private place or to prevent the penis been rapped, and to send you to the criminal court if you dare to touch my money or to fancy you can get my money via the penis.
I was even asked, "would you invite the women to your house, or introduce any woman to the penis you are fuching for that matter?"
I say being a traditional polygamist, I can certainly introduce if that penis is a leftover to me already and it is from the penis' own willingness to be introduced, but it won't be my trick to throw out a faithful life partner. I am telling you that no woman can be invited to my house for that matter but I will call the house-staff to help out the packing at the first second when the penis is introduced. No compensation would ever be arranged.
----June 18th, 2018
06-17-2018 King Lee is the ancient pronunciation-translation of my ancient grandfather's name Jing Li (南唐中主李璟, 916-961AD）
Heard this morning's talk about "Pejoves" Fund（中文）.
My response: "The investor is not allowed to own" is voiced by the People's Republic of China.
The anger is not related to the modern Business Administration's understanding which recommends investors to be separated with the managerial & administrative power of an investment to enhance the professionalism on business investment's management.
The anger is similar to "you pay for the house, but you are not allowed to own the house nor to occupy the house." (correct me if I am wrong)
The producing team is grouped by the private assistant's related and the "ex-girlfriend" family, which is the hijacker-group of my $9000 (￥9000) living expense providing paid-out from this American "Pejoves" Fund company since I was born in 1967 till I left China in 1996. Those threatening voices are from some actresses and their friend's Middle East romance, etc.
It seems this group doesn't think anything can be wrongful at all for what they did to me and my parents but still trying to get more as if the hijacking is this group's privilege. The reason they were used as the transmitting channel was because the People's Republic of China had severed diplomatic relations since 1949 until 1972 when President Nixon did the State visit to China, there was no money transfering service between the United States and the People's Republic of China. This group of people was not selected by any American nor any American company's employee.
矛盾问题就是，这一群人是我爷爷方智仁当年的于姓私人助理及兄弟姊妹的子女后裔，中国是从1949年开始和美国断交，1972年尼克松访华才恢复外交关系,1967年时没有美国向中国的银行汇款服务。这群人既不是由任何美国人挑选的，也不是由美国公司的任何雇员挑选的。 当年于姓私人助理是这家美国公司支付我的生活费的类似包裹快递的上海中转站，就像现在海外中国城都有的“中国包裹快递”这种，他们就是其中一站，但他们把包裹也就是生活费全部给扣下了，没给我父母，这包裹就是从1967年到1996年的每月9000人民币生活费。现在我成年了，人也在美国了，他们就在中国政府支持下跑美国来，必须要把这家美国公司在美国通过美国“快递公司”（美国财政部）交给我的生活费归他们所有，这不是像拦路抢劫还能是什么呀？
I heard the "thought" is this American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop the pay-out even after the fact that my parents and I did not receive a penny was known should mean "the granting". This "continuing pay-out" has been the issue between my Trust and the American "Pejoves" Fund company. I can understand the American "Pejoves" Fund company's consideration for my best interest, at least some level if not all, and this is what I express to my entrusting group. For one, I got affluent providing on my food as a child growing-up which wouldn't be easy on my parents' joint-income of￥40-￥50 per month if the paid-out completely stop.
Regarding exactly who I am to this American "Pejoves" Fund company, well, I am the beneficiary-owner of my Trust, my Trust, which was set up for me by Jing Li( or King Lee, 南唐中主李璟) in 961AD or so, has been the up-stream investor-owner of this American "Pejoves" Fund company, as this American "Pejoves" Fund company has already clarified.
King Lee is the ancient spelling translation of 李璟, this ancient spelling translation has been used in Hong Kong as well until 1990. Jing Li is the current standard English spelling translation of the People's Republic of China for 李璟. His son (my grandfather) is the famous Chinese poet "King of the Ci Poem" Yu Li（or Yuk Lee, "词帝” 南唐后主李煜, 937-978AD).
Example: 李锦记公司英文名：Lee Kum Kee Food company, the standard spelling translation for 李锦 would be: Jin Li.
References for Hong Kong common pronunciations:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4b0bb6850101avar.html
https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ccaf99b269dc5022aaea0052.html
----June 17th, 2018
Some ask exactly what has been the issue between me and Chinese National Leaders' true & lifelong love stories.
My response: The same issue as the one I am having with some American big names.
"Why their love affair is my money to pay?" has been my scream this entire time. Why they got a true love who they owe their life-long devotions is the reason that my money should be transferred to their bank accounts without my own willingness.
----June 17th, 2018
06-16-2018 就我的信托继承，我给方家后人和方家亲戚的一份说明
Heard this morning's talk about sexual intercourse money.
My response: Well, this morning's "objecting" group are, not were but have been, helping hands of what they are objecting, so, the "objecting" tones are very amicable.
----June 16th, 2018
听说了方家后人对于我没有通知他们我继承了信托很是愤怒。
我的回应：因为我当时有脑伤失意症状，在2004年6月30日及7月1日会议上也都有谈到，所以我会议结束后完全没有任何会议记忆，这也是我2015年开始查寻“我2004年究竟继承的是什么”查寻的很苦的原因。我在2015年我有现金拨打国际长途电话后就已经通知了南京方面。
按照法律，我是信托的唯一受益人而非信托的受委托人，作为信托唯一受益人的我没有任何法律上的责任义务通知其他任何人。我通知南京方面我在查询只是出于亲情，而非亏欠。我当时如果有上海亲戚的通联方式，我也会出于亲情通知他们。
我的信托律师从来不是方家共用的律师，我没有任何法律上的责任义务也没有任何意愿将我的律师包括信托律师作为方家的公用律师。
我已经将我所知道的我如何继承信托的一些信息公布在此博客，也很早就已经将此博客地址通知南京方面，我能通知上海亲戚的也就只有这个博客地址。我目前没有任何比此播客已经公布的内容更具体的信息，我今后也没有任何意愿谈论我的私人财务，所以我也不会有比这博客已经公布的内容更多的信息通知上海亲戚。如果我能有上海亲戚的通联，我愿意告知他们此博客地址。我的这个博客其实就是我的查询日记。
若有任何怀疑我的律师将方家任何人的可继承财产非法归我所有，这其实是在指控这些律师以我名义偷窃方家其他人的钱财只是没有转入这些律师他们自己的银行而已。如果这是真实怀疑及指控，这就已经是针对这些律师的刑事指控，应该向司法公安机关举报刑事贪污偷窃案件，而非认为我是在授权只愿意通过司法公安机关给钱。司法公安机关是捍卫法治社会司法公平正义的政府机构，不是文娱演出单位，更非私人律师或者财经服务公司。
民事法庭是针对财产所有权解决纠纷的地方，按照法律要求就财产的拥有权必须给个符合法律的说法的地方，报警是就财产被非法抢夺而寻求执法人员协助的方式。
我方敏所继承钱财被一些人在没有任何法律依据可以上民事法庭打财产纠纷官司的情况下， 莫名其妙就被要求我方敏必须就我所继承钱财给这些人一个非法律的说法，而且不用给钱方式解决这个矛盾就是不行，是我方敏就此报警的原因。我方敏报警就是在寻求执法人员协助保护我方敏的合法财产。
至于上海亲戚投诉他们的父亲方智仁的信托遗嘱看不到，我本人认为上海亲戚没有任何需要看方智仁的这份遗嘱。方智仁替我设立的信托是在1948年设立时就是设立成为法人机构，所以有当时的法人机构登记记录在香港政府。方智仁设立该信托时，方智仁的所有子女都已经出生，方智仁设立该信托时所立下的委托书在他去世后以后就成为方智仁就这份信托所立下的遗嘱。方智仁是1965年去世，方智仁去世前也已经对他的所有子女做了1965年的亲笔临终交代及财产安排。方智仁从1948年该信托设立后到他1965年去世就从未更改他本人的信托意愿。我方敏认为在方智仁所有子女都已经有了方智仁1965年所立下的遗嘱的情况下，方智仁1948年就信托所立下的遗嘱是方智仁给我方敏的私人信件，我方敏不愿意此信件被任何人查询。
至于有人质疑方智仁哪里来的这么多钱，这是合法私人钱财，多少都不管任何人的事。方智仁，方智仁的父亲和爷爷三代都是当时的中华民国政府教育部的捐款大户，三代所捐款项总额是当时的中华民国政府设立中央大学系统全部所需金额的90%左右。当时因为有很多方姓人士捐款，所以有很多说法。方智仁的父亲是方智仁爷爷的胎记掌纹及财产继承人，方智仁父子就捐款金额也非常低调，但台湾的中华民国政府教育部档案里应该有正确的信息。
方智仁父亲的所有子女都是我曾祖母所出，方智仁的所有子女都是我祖母所出是方智仁的父亲这支从方智仁这一代才开始有亲戚走动的原因，我方敏从未听说方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女， 我方敏也从未和方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女有过任何往来。
----2018年6月16日。
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站收费处之后，你要么下了楼梯就在东北大学里，要么下了楼梯你就不知该往哪走，要么你就走着走着就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。
我的电邮地址：SomebodyInMA@gmail.com
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
09-29-2018 All are rumors, but I have to let people hear to check out if impacted (都是些传言，但我应该说出来让大家查查有没有受到过影响）
中华人民共和国有已经出版的现成法律可以让政府向困扰人士解释什么法律权益及财产的法律所有权，有现成的中国公安部可以调查是否有违反法律的行为，有武装警察不怕穷凶极恶之徒，我难以明白，“活着不吃你们一粒米，死了也不用你们付丧葬费”，为什么我在美国以一个美国公民身份说我继承了我亲生爷爷在1949年中国大陆解放之前就已经信托在国外的钱居然会造成中国人民共和国的社会治安问题？
The People's Republic of China has existing in-prints laws for the Chinese government to explain to all those confused what is lawful ownership of any confused money, China has public safety department to track down those intentionally to challenge laws, and China has armed police in troops to protect Chinese people from extremes. I just can't understand, being an American citizen who "doesn't eat a piece of crops when living and bears no cost to you by death", why my freedom to state I am rich can become a disturbing factor to China's national security? All the money I stated to own has been entrusted outside China before 1949 the ruling of the current People's Republic of China.
1: I heard this morning's actress wife whose husband featured in this morning's story of "need to 30% profit need from companies in British, France, etc." is a British married since 2007. The Chinese wife is another Amercian's wife since 2006. I never met both husbands nor both wives either. (今天早上提到的“必须从法国英国的公司里拿三成利润的”那个人的妻子是个英国女演员，2007年就结婚了的。另一个中国人也是和她的美国人丈夫在2006年就已经结婚了。我从未见过这两个当丈夫的（美国人），也从未见过这两个人各自的妻子。）
2: One of the producers of this morning's broadcasting is. by rumor, the eldest child from "the Beijing ex-girlfriend's story." The updates on that story are that she was the girlfriend to my grandfather's private assistant who possibly mothers this eldest child from the private assistant Ding(丁). This private assistant Ding was rumored biologically fathered by a Mr. Yu who was in 5 cousins with the famous Beijing actor Yu, Shizhi（于是之). This private assistant Ding's biological family was rumored the group who have despised my grandmother so much to have been so reach-out to despise me in order to "disqualify" me to be the beneficiary of my own birth grandfathers' Trusts. I have contacted U.S. laws regarding all these hate-arousing efforts from the Chinese community. According to laws, I am the sole beneficiary of my own Trusts after my 2004's inheriting and entrusting.（今天早上提到的那个制作人是“北京前女友故事”的长子。最新消息是这个北京前女友其实是丁姓私人助理的一份情并一起育有这个长子。丁姓私人助理据传是有一位于先生的血脉传承，这个于先生和北京人艺的名演员于是之是五福以内的亲戚。据说这个丁姓私人助理及其血缘亲人们对我奶奶是厌恶至极，所以如此伸长了脖子对我表达如此不耻厌恶就为了让普天下的世人都明白我“如此不配”继承我自己亲生爷爷们替我设立的信托。我是就华裔社区一直有人不停的煽动针对我方敏的仇恨向美国警方报警。根据法律，在2004年我继承信托有重新办理信托之后，我是自己替我自己所设立的信托的唯一受益人。）
It is rumored private assistant Ding's biological family has been saying this in quotes: "She does not deserve you, and I would give you her money if I can have the opportunity" to everybody that in romance rumor with me. And "throw-out her children if you already have some by mistake. Just take the money," is rumored said by private assistant Ding's biological relatives in the Chinese foreign department. （据传就是丁姓私人助理的血缘家庭在到处和人说我方敏不配这个男人不配那个男人，有机会就只要把方敏的钱弄走就得。至于到处那些表态说”如果某人不幸犯错已经有了方敏的孩子也就是扔出去就得的“据说是丁姓私人助理在中国外交部的一些于姓亲朋。）
It is rumored American Albert Gore's Chinese romance Miss Yu was a former Chinese diplomat who is in 7th cousins association with private Ding's biological family, in 5-cousins relative relationship to the famous Shanghai Miss Yu who,rumored, died miserably at age 31(unmarried & unwanted, with a wounded womb incapable to carry a child) in the 1970s because her father conditioned her to have a child before inheriting the Trust in Hong Kong that her father had set up for her solely in 1946 or so. （据说美国名人阿尔贝特·高尔的中国情名嫒于姓小姐是中国外交部的前任外交官，和丁姓私人助理是7等亲，和70年代时在上海去世的那个上海名嫒于小姐是五等亲。据说上海在1970-1979年代有个于小姐，因为其父亲于先生在1946年替她在香港设立了一个信托并规定其女儿上海于小姐必须有她自己的小孩之后才可以继承（据说就是现在总值50万或者5千万美金的那个香港于家信托）。据说这个上海于小姐31岁悲凉去世时既没结过婚也交不到男朋友，她的子宫也还因为受损根本就不可能怀孕生子。）
Rumored this was the same group who may have made my father's both younger sisters had troubled marriages in Shanghai local area in the same tone as you heard from this morning's broadcasting, and possibly did give out my grandfather's money at family inheriting time as declared "get their money and move on" similarly as you heard from this morning's broadcasting.（据说就是这同一拨人可能让我父亲的两个妹妹在上海当地的婚姻都是有点故事。原因可能就是你们今天早上听到的语气表达，据说还有可能真是把我爷爷的钱在分家产时按照”就是不会要你，拿了钱就过自己日子去了”的原则送人处理了。就是你们今天早上听到的这种态度。。丁姓私人助理自己拿的是我父亲的应分的那一份。）
3: I heard so many angry voices from the People's Republic of China saying I am too much. So I am asking exactly which money, what amount, whose money, what law & law items, what incidence to make you state so? In English or in Chinese. China has the Chinese Constitution（中华人民共和国宪法）, Trusting laws（中华人民共和国信托法）, inheriting laws（中华人民共和国继承法）, and criminal laws（中华人民共和国刑法） in prints for whoever can read to find references to answer my question regarding what law & law items has regulated so clearly on what matter for so many Chinese to yell at me "too much". （我听说中华人民共和国和有很多愤怒的声音说我太过份了，我想问一下，究竟是什么钱，多少钱，谁的钱以及哪条法律的那一条条款，以及究竟什么原因让你们就是够资格如此说三道四？中华人民共和国的现行的宪法，刑法，继承法以及信托法等都是有已经正式出版过的中文版和英文版，念过书识点字的都可以查阅以回答我所提出的上述问题也就是：“究竟平哪条法律那一条款让你们可以对我吆喝实在太离谱了”。
----Sept 29th. 2018
09-27-2018 于家故事还有多少？(How many more stories related to Yu's family)
我爷爷方智仁在香港替我设立的信托，是在1948年，当时的设立资金就是一千五百万美金，方智仁爷爷在1948年设立该信托时就已经指定是为我这个（女掌）孙女所设立的该信托，方智仁爷爷的该意愿也从未更改，我方敏本人2004年是按照方智仁爷爷的遗嘱继承了该信托。丁姓私人助理及其于家亲朋和我父亲方文海以及我方敏本人都没有任何法律上的责任义务关系。
听说了上海有名的1970年代已经去世的那个于家小姐的信托，是由这个于家小姐的父亲于老先生为其女儿于小姐所设立的，设立时的金额也完全不同，和我方敏的信托根本就不是同一个信托，也不是由同一家机构进行投资管理的，我方敏和已去世的于家小姐也从无任何亲戚关系。我实在不清楚于家小姐的亲戚们究竟为什么要为我方敏的信托争执不休。
Abstract: There was a famous deceased who Miss Yu died in 1970 in Shanghai, her famous Trust was set up by her father Mr.Yu in Hong Komg. Her Trust was a complete different Trust with mine (amount, setttler, etc), and there is no association between me and deceased Miss Yu, I don't know why her relatives need to fight about my Trust.
----2018年9月27日。
据说我妈妈还在，也已经拿到了我给的退休金，据说我父亲也在，但还没有拿到我给的退休金，我自己的基本生活费也没拿到。原因就是2004年7月1日那天付款的公司就是由和每月一万美金（丁姓私人助理及于家）故事的同一个爷爷（南唐中主李璟）给我的信托所投资的。我听说目前还在撇清一些困扰，希望很快。（因为困扰，钱被困扰者给扣下了）。妈妈的那笔退休金不是这个爷爷的信托支付的，而是支付第一年生活费的那家信托，投资了一些退休基金，所以拿到了。如果爸爸的那笔和我也不是同一个爷爷，那他老人家还得再等等了。我的目前是在澄清困扰阶段（第三年的），他的那笔还没听说（如果是第二年的，就应该已经拿到了）。
(I heard my mother still alive and received retirement arrangement which was paid by the first year's providing Trust, I heard my father still alive as well but did not receive anything, similar to my situation. Mine was paid by the current still confusing one (the third year's), I don't know which one paid for my father's, he still need to wait a bit more. All paid on July 1st of 2004 but kept undistributed to us because of confusion.)
听说那几集广播剧的其中一个制作人就是那个“北京前女友”的女儿或者是其长子，据说其长子是丁姓私人助理的，据说爸爸你可是在晚餐饭桌上亲耳听到过丁姓私人助理就是当着他自己老婆的面以上海话“老二”称谓向方智仁介绍北京那女的。 据说方智仁（或丁姓私人助理自己）也在北京那女的第一个孩子出生后是用电汇送了100元人民币的礼钱。(I heard one of the producer is the Beijing ex-girlfriend's child, I heard her first born is from the private assistant Ding, I heard you heard by your own ears how she was introduced to grandpa by the private assistant in front of his wife. I heard grandpa or private assistant himself had sent her a ￥100 gift for her first child-birth.)
爸爸，估计广播剧如此制作是不希望你和妈妈联系，不是为了闹吃醋而是为了抢夺财产，理由据说是毛阿妹当年（1958年）答应过丁姓助理要和方智仁要求把方智仁想给你的那一份钱归丁姓私人助理。老爸爸，你的退休金安排是我方敏给的，香港的那个信托是方智仁自1948年设立伊始就指定我为唯一受益人的，方智仁也从未更改他是为了我在香港设立了该信托的意愿。我已经就你和妈妈的遭遇在美国报警。(I guess the radio program's producing such saying is to prevent you to reunite with mama in order to get my wealth. The reason I heard is grandma had agreed to ask grandpa give your share of inheritable to private assistant Ding. Papa, your retirement arrangement was paid by my money, I am the granddaughter grandpa specified as the sole beneficiary of the Trust he set up in Hong Kong in 1948. I have contacted laws in U.S. ever since I heard your "death".)
(4：据说我爷爷在1965年去世时，把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产（两万元人名币左右）全部给了丁姓助理，就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年，就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ￥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
----published on September 18th, 2018 )
----2018年9月27日。
很多华人都很好奇，British Convoy 究竟是什么机构？就是英国政府驻外机构的意思，据说就是英国驻美国领事馆在1776年美国独立以前的名称。当时那句话也就是在说“100%全权拥有英国驻美国领事馆”，就是一个英国在美国的移民吵架超级乐时一句笑话而已。
----2018年9月27日。
09-26-2018 The anger towards the possibility that my mother is still alive （我妈妈要是还活着妨碍谁了，哪来这么大的愤怒啊？）
The entire time I have complained this radio program is produced in order to bilk for money, please correct me on if this producing is to clarify confusions or intended to confuse the audience?
Example, who is my mother, if my mother is still alive, why my mother possibly still alive can anger so many people who never had anything to do with her entire life? All I could hear is who deserve to own her retirement arrangement and her medical expense leftovers (or the $400Million wholesome "if deceased already").
This arrangement I made for my parents is the reason I am holding the hope they may still alive even though I have an angry question regarding why it is necessary for them to be as such. I already called laws to help regarding my parents possible situation since 2015, I really have no such need nor such desire to beg some radio program producers' charity to know my parents' news, but I do appreciate any truthful reporting of my parents' whereabouts can truly ease my concern about them, as well as any respect to their privacy for preventing harassment purpose.这份退休金计划安排是我对我父母是否还活着抱有希望的原因，虽然我很气愤为什么他们需要被如此安排。2015年以后我就已经就我父母的处境而报警了，所以我不是仰赖广播剧制作人员的慈善之举才能知道我父母消息，但我很感谢对于他们生活行踪的所有如实报道让我放心他们许多，我也很感激对于他们隐私的尊重以及对于他们安全地保护。
The explanation I can give regarding the anger reflected in this morning's broadcasting:
- 1: Regarding the retirement arrangement: I made such an arrangement for my birth mother exclusively and paid entirely by a Trust I inherited. This arrangement's related service fees were paid at the same time. It was decided on July 1st of 2004 already that any leftover in the $400Million medical expenses yearly prepayment will be taking back to the paying account. 退休金计划是我为我母亲她自己所作的安排，·100%由我所继承的一个信托已经支付了的，相关的手续费用也是同时一并支付了的。2004年7月1日那天就已经决定了医疗费用里剩余的部分会退回给付款账户。
- 1-1: I have no idea why and how some other people can receive what money, nor from where.我完全不清楚其他人都是会从哪里拿些什么钱。
- 2: A Trust can only be inherited by a will defined by the settler has been the major difference between a Trust-inheriting and family-inheritance. 信托是必须按遗嘱继承的，这是信托继承和一般继承的重要区别。
- 2-1: I was never raised by my younger brother, and I never owe his wife a man's genitals I never had on my biological body. My younger brother's own willingness to have his marriage such way is none of my matter, but I have to make my statement that I do not owe my younger brother a penny nor his wife a man's genitals no matter how much I inherited, and I do not owe a penny to his wife's possible out-of-marriage child's possible birthfather's marriage family nor any of their marriages associated relatives.我不是由我的弟弟养大的，我也不欠他的妻子一条我自己身上从来没有长过的阳具。我弟弟自己愿意他自己的婚姻就是现在这种状态，这是和我完全无关的事情。但是我必须做出我自己的如下声明：不管我继承了多少钱，我都没有欠我的弟弟一分钱，我也没有欠了他的妻子一条阳具，我更没有亏欠了他的妻子可能是婚外所出小孩的可能孩子亲爹以及他们婚姻所涉及的亲朋。
- 3: The paying American company is fully solely owned and lawfully registered by a British company which has been verified by the confusing family together with their explanations for their confusion in this same radio program's broadcasting earlier, please direct any confusion regarding this to this paying American company.
- 3-1: It has been explained by the paying American company that this paying together with the paying amount to cover my both parents' retirement arrangements and medical expenses are all lawfully instructed by this paying American company's lawfully registered owner-company. The ownership confusion regarding this particular American paying company's this particular payment is ridiculous enough to be a reason to insult my birth mother.
----Sept 26th, 2018
1：我是否是因为个人生活方面的困扰，为了和洛家，福家的女人比飙，才一定要说自己和这两家是一样富裕。
我的回答：从来不是我在比飙。我所宣称的信托财富也从来没有和这两家的名字连在一起过。
我是在2004年6月30日继承那天被告知我所继承的信托中的两个是和这两家的财富规模差不多。如果结婚，就是同等规模的联姻 (same size match if considering marriage)。就是现在已经澄清了的合法的两笔生活费用给付（第一年，第二年）的付款信托。
听说：福家是因为每月一万美金自1997年1月起-2004年左右都是以我的名字（Min Fang)由支付公司所投资的的福家公司的总账支票账户所支付，虽然我本人没有收到，但福家的认为这是我和某某的相识被家里长辈认可的标志而比；洛家的是因为娘家姓氏和我的生活费用给付的支付公司有关联，对我的生活费用给付标准很气愤所以才比。两家都是普遍在比飙，不是一个两个特定人士。
2：我痛骂的原因：他们是在说妈妈如果还活着，就没有其他手段可以谋生。连吃饭，飞机票等恐怕都是以享受外国恋爱换来的。
我的回答：他们就是不敢相信妈妈是嫁了一个富豪的儿子，所以气势汹汹。虽然爸爸没继承到什么钱，爷爷给女儿的生活费也没让妈妈生下女儿就可以一辈子不为柴米油盐犯愁，可是，女儿给的退休金足够妈妈自己坐飞机到处游玩了，也不需要什么谋生手段了。妈妈已经退休了，女儿给的是退休金。在一切困扰澄清之前，请保护好自己。
据说国内就是这么说89年学运时出国的那一批女生的。在海外，从来没有人这么说89年学运出国的女生。美国买一张往返中国的飞机票就只要900美金，很便宜，就算是借款，她们这些女生在中餐馆做做工，两个星期就可以还得起，不需要用自己年轻的外国恋爱来换一张飞机票钱或者路费。
----Sept 26th, 2018
09-25-2018 89年学运同学为了Viagra的智慧产权就有和我杠上了& 桥口大学的那个马一茜 （Tracy Ma ）
今天早上的广播可以听出海外一些89年学运对当年的那份怀恋，当年89年的那一代，都是自己的孩子都快要大学毕业的一代人，如今还能在广播上听见当年自己上大学时的“同学们，我们上街游行去吧”的那一份认真和执着。
我对今天早上播出的意见就是: 作为警界从业人员，他们为什么说他们自己是美国法律管辖权的解释权威而不再只是法律的执行者？在美国，法律的管辖解释权争议应该是属于美国最高法院法官来解释的。
今天早上提到的就是我在Viagra里的那一份智慧产权收入被人提走是否属于美国警方查办案件范围，89年学运同学说就只是属于民事纠纷，警方不会理睬。
我听说的是美国药业公司已经就我方敏是否有智慧产权以及如何评估的做出了解释，89年学运的同学是在质疑美国药业公司所做的评估不公吗？可是拿钱的那一方根本就也没参与Viagra的研究也没对Viagra的研究做出贡献，就只是个制药行业的从业人员，为什么这种某名奇妙直接拿钱就变成了民事纠纷，依据是什么呀？
如果我不满意药业公司对我所作贡献的评估，或者参与Viagra的研究人员不同意药业公司所作的评估结果，按照法律常识，属于民事纠纷。也就是说，这笔钱，要么是我的，要么就是参与研究的其他人员的，或者就是专利买家公司不应该支付的款项。拿钱的人所拿的应该是什么钱，必须从Viagra的专利所得中支付？89年学运的同学有什么药业方面的专业知识能力以及权威可以在Viagra的专利产权评估的权威性上发表如此言论？
据悉，有华人坚持是该药业公司的权威人士对我所发表言论极为反感，我的态度是请给我一个电邮进行符合法律的权威性的纠正。我的电邮地址：somebodyinMA@gmail.com
----2018年9月25日
还有，就是上海人马一茜，就是以前硚口大学（BridgeportUniversity）的那个Tracy Ma，据说还在四处拨打电话散步对我方敏仇恨。据说她的做法被她的中国领导人“姻亲”，开玩笑说这是在从事当年中国共产党地下组织的工作。
如果这是真的，作为马一茜可能是在违反美国法律散布仇恨这种做法的可能的受害人，我方敏想问一下，这是在鼓励马一茜破坏美国法律甚至推翻美国政府吗？当年的中国共产党的地下组织就是用这种方法宣传中国当时执政的国民党政府是个贪污腐败根本没有法律只有贪赃枉法的政府。当年的中国共产党地下组织就是用这种方式成功推翻了中国国民政府，所以我才问，中国政府高官是在鼓励用这种方法散步仇恨就是应该吗，目的究竟是什么？有否想过这种做法有可能在中国推翻中国共产党自己领导的政府吗？为什么在中国共产党已经取得中国960万平方公里土地的政治领导权的情况下，不能用中国共产党自己所制订的中华人民共和国的法律来解决各种矛盾？作为中国国家法治建设的领导人，是否认为马一茜的做法是在违反美国的法律？
----2018年9月25日
我的回应：2004年7月以前，我经常去她家里做客不是因为恨她。而是当她是个可以一起聊聊天的，但绝不愿意让她到我家里翻箱底的这么一个人。我当时从未听说过串婚，也打心眼里不赞同她的婚姻观，她的方姓丈夫虽也是籍贯宁波镇海的上海人，但我当时从未听说有此亲戚(现在听说也确实没有血缘关系)，她丈夫也是马一茜向我介绍是她丈夫的，所以我是在2004年6月份在新洲一对夫妻都不是上海人的大学同学家里提到马一茜小孩一事，但从未向她丈夫举报，因为不是她丈夫朋友也确实不知该如何处理才合适。
2004年7月1日据说有提到马一茜，因为当时的美国移民法改革，她的方姓丈夫虽是美国公民但不能帮她解决美国居留身份问题，我当时挺乐意帮帮她解决她的身份（现在听说她的身份是别人帮忙解决的），但不乐意给她丈夫一笔钱。据说有些华人对此很愤怒，我就很奇怪，我当时是马一茜的朋友，我就只愿意帮她解决一下她的美国居留身份却会愿意给她丈夫一大笔钱，为什么呀？想让她丈夫把她当垃圾给扔出去啊？我当时并不恨马一茜，我为什么会这么处理？
很多人说，如果马一茜在2004年7月以前对我还是很友善，我为什么在2004年6月把她说成那样？因为确实就她的婚姻观对她有看法。我是听马一茜自己说她丈夫对她有多好，我是听马一茜自己说她是自己如何坚决愿意和以前的男朋友分手，就为和她的丈夫可以正正经经结婚生孩子的，我是听马一茜自己说她的丈夫如何愿意做两份餐馆工让她可以不用出去做工的 , 我从未像很多女人对马一茜不用出去做工很反感，就是因为我是亲眼看见是她丈夫自己的态度是他自己很愿意他自己多苦点可以让他自己的老婆小孩舒服点，然后我是自己发现原来她的小孩不是她丈夫亲生的。
就是因为我确实因为她的婚姻观对她本人有很多负面看法，平时很多不会说的与我无关的小细节，那天的负面态度也都体现了。但我当时很清楚，就算我对她有很多负面看法，她的婚姻问题还是不应该由我介入，2004年7月1日那天我当时还是乐意帮她解决身份问题让她不用依赖婚姻。
2004年7月底我搬到麻州波士顿后，马一茜对我当时在摩根大通银行工作的恶意仇恨宣泄似的干扰是我从那时起就不再和马一茜交往的原因，马一茜在我2007年1月离开摩根大通银行之后持续不懈的仇恨表达是我永远认为马一茜很恶劣的原因。
所谓的上海心理学界对此的一些解释，可能是基于他们都是上海人很清楚丁姓私人助理1967-1996年的家庭财务如何优越，而非对于已经远在美国多年的我方敏有多少了解。
09-24-2018 今天早上播出了中国出入境管理局永久禁止方敏入境 (Forbidden to enter China announced this morning on the radio program)
听说了今天早上中国出入境管理局雇佣演员宣布了永久禁止方敏入境。我是接到过中国领事馆的一个电话通知，是有这么一个文件，起因于国内执法单位发现有我的假护照。我已报告美国警方我从未认识该案的涉案人员也从未参与提供私人资料。不知今天早上的播出是否和此有关，但我也不是太在意。
I heard this morning's broadcasting about the announcement from the Chinese Bureau of Exit and Entry Administration, the announcement is to forbid me to enter China permanently. I did receive a phone call from NYC consulate about a forged passport caught by Chinese law enforcement earlier this year. I have reported to the U.S. law people that I never heard of the involved personnel and I never participated by providing my personal information. I am not certain if this morning's broadcasting is because of this but it does not bother me a lot.
旁人看我的处境就是：如果我有钱，是中国政府在海内海外号召华人对我恶意攻击；如果我没钱，我是既没钱也没有任何亲朋好友或者任何工作学习需要去中国大陆，包括旅游在内。所有国内交往过没有交往过的人士名单基本上都已经一网打尽，全部通过广播剧高调宣布和我过去没有现在没有将来也永远不会有任何关系了。
From outsiders, my situation is if I have money, it is from the Chinese government who organized all these malicious attacks me as a person. If I have no money, I have no friends, nor associated personnel, nor associated any sort of organization, nor any sort of contacts to be a reason for me to go to China, not even as a tourist. All-inclusively in an almost complete list that has announced loudly on the radio program to have no association with me, in the past, at present, and in the future.
我本人看法：全部都是经过中国政府，美国人阿尔伯特·高尔和美国洛克菲勒家一些人士进行组织安排和协调而恶意制造的舆论事件。就广播剧制作单位的所有这些做法，我都已经在美国报警。
From myself, All these conducted malicious shit-throwing on the media are organized by this administration of Chinese government, American Albert Gore and Rockefellers, I have already contacted U.S. law enforcement about all these illegal activities in radio program producing.
美国有法律，我就只要投诉向警方投诉美国的阿尔伯特·高尔及洛克菲勒家一些人士是否是在通过广播剧制作单位恶意性骚扰或者进行仇恨犯罪就可以，都是美国联邦刑事法律所规定的罪名。所以，如果确实是阿尔伯特·高尔或者洛克菲勒家一些人士有参与制造并传播仇恨，我会受到美国法律保障。美国政府是誓言捍卫法制国家的。
The United States is a lawful country so that I just need to complain to the laws if American Albert Gore or if Rockefellers have conducted malicious sexual harassment or even hate crime against me, both are federal crimes. So, I will be protected by laws if I have been the victim of the sexual harassment or the hate crime that possibly conducted by the American Albert Gore or the Rockefellers. The U.S. government has sworn to keep the U.S. a lawful country.
至于中国方面，如果确实是这一届的中国政府在通过广播剧参与针对我方敏的敲诈勒索恐吓威胁并破坏名誉的一系列中国刑法所界定的刑事犯罪活动，不准我入境中国的宣布，对我的人身安全来说，不是什么负面宣布。
About China, if it is indeed this administration of the Chinese government who conducted all these crimes as Extortion, threatening, blackmail and name harm against me, it is not a negative announcement at all to forbid me to enter China, as long as I won't be safe from being a victim defined by the Chinese criminal laws but possibly victimized by the Chinese government, this is from my personal safety point of views.
在美国，通过大众传媒制造谎言散布仇恨，已经超越了美国宪法所赋予的言论自由。
原因：不是每一个美国公民都可以任意凭一张美国公民身份证就可以走进任何一家大众传媒广播公司随便发表个人看法，所以，在大众传媒的广播上发表个人看法已经超越美国宪法所赋予每一个美国公民的的平等美国公民权力，我个人认为应该不属于是美国宪法所保障的每一个美国公民的，平等的，言论自由的权利。
In the United States, to spread maliciousness, negativeness or even hate emotions on public media is beyond the right of freedom of speech.
Reason: Not every single U.S citizen can freely walk into a public media radio broadcasting company to express the personal opinion on a public radio broadcasting media so that it is not the right of freedom granted by the U.S. Constitution that supposes to be a same equal right to all U.S. citizens. I personally think freely publish the personal opinion on a not free-accessible-to-all public media is not in the scope of freedom of speech as the right from the U.S. Constitution.
09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语）
----2018年9月24日。
09-23-2018 Why my parents haven't contacted me if they still alive? （如果爸爸妈妈还活着，他们怎么还没和我联系啊？）
A lot would ask me why my parents don't come to Boston to unite with me if they both still alive. I assume one big possibility is the financial situation. I have been pennies that is truly no cash at all until I called law's help since 2015. I am still in the situation that taking an air flight will make me ponder. （很多人可能都会问我，如果我父母还活着，为什么他们不来波士顿找我。我估计最大的可能就是他们的经济状况。我2015年前就一直是一分钱现金都没有知道报警后才逐渐好转。我现在也还是没有坐飞机去外地的经济能力。）
Another possible reason is unrecognizable. Photos I published on this web blog are both unrecognizable to my parents if they both still alive. If they met me in person, I am possibly recognizable to them because my appearance resembles my mother when she was in her 50s. My body figure is unrecognizable. I assume they are possibly the same, recognizable to the family when in person.（另一个可能的原因就是因为癌症治疗期间，长相变得认不出来了。我在这个博客上发表的两张照片我父母就不会敢相认。如果他们还在，在街上遇见我就有可能认得出来，我现在的样子很像我妈妈50多岁的时候。我的身形还是完全认不出来。我估计他们也是差不多，但家里人见了面能认得出来。）
The third possible reason is why they are in this shabby situation if the daughter should have made a lot of money from the radio program worldwide broadcasting. Well, the daughter has been in a same shabby situation because “1) so many people deserve to take the daughter's intellectual income to live a much better life", 2) a lot confused families have been concerned if my living expenses payments are actually from their family wealth, so that law people have to withhold the intellectual income discovered and payments cleared from confusions till the daughter is clarified to be safe to have the free access to the money.（第三个原因可能就是他们难以理解为什么自己女儿的广播剧全世界热播挣了好多钱，他们怎么过的这么惨？因为 1) 有太多人“就是应该拿我的钱过一份应得的好日子”，2）还有很多人很担心我的生活费用给付是不是从他们家的财产里付出来的，所以一些已明确是我的智慧产权的收入以及一些已经澄清困扰的生活费用给付都是在被警方保护着直到女儿我可以安全拿钱为止，女儿我现在经济上也是一样的惨兮兮。）
The third possible reason is why they are in this shabby situation if the daughter should have made a lot of money from the radio program worldwide broadcasting. Well, the daughter has been in a same shabby situation because “1) so many people deserve to take the daughter's intellectual income to live a much better life", 2) a lot confused families have been concerned if my living expenses payments are actually from their family wealth, so that law people have to withhold the intellectual income discovered and payments cleared from confusions (two out of four already) till the daughter is clarified to be safe to have the free access to the money.（第三个原因可能就是他们难以理解为什么自己女儿的广播剧全世界热播挣了好多钱，他们怎么过的这么惨？因为 1) 有太多人“就是应该拿我的钱过一份应得的好日子”，2）还有很多人很担心我的生活费用给付是不是从他们家的财产里付出来的，所以一些已明确是我的智慧产权的收入以及一些已经澄清困扰的生活费用给付(4个中的两个已经澄清）都是在被警方保护着直到女儿我可以安全拿钱为止，女儿我现在经济上也是一样的惨兮兮。）
If I have this much blessing already, why the younger generation grandfathers still blessing me handsomely? I have been the extra-son that nobody heard of for each of this blessing-story generation that blessed with a non-heir-son's size. It was so obvious in my great-grandmother's generation that all my great-grandfather's children were from her but she did not mind at all when there was one extra-child who was blessed with a Trust.（我都已经有好些爷爷给我钱了，为什么后面的爷爷还给我钱？我一直都是哪个多出来的一个不知哪儿冒出来的非继承人儿子。在分家产时也顺便给我设一个信托也就是给我送个礼物的意思。这在我曾祖母那一代就特别明显，我曾祖父所有的孩子都是我曾祖母生的，等到分家产时，还是又多出了一个非继承人儿子的信托，而我曾祖母还一点都没在意还一点都不生气这不知从哪儿冒出来的一个孩子分到了理应是她孩子们的财产。她其实很清楚，这多出来的一个也是她的孩子--- 她的曾孙女我。）
My grandfather put the majority of his wealth into that Trust in Hong Kong because the beneficiary girl (me) would be born as his heir-granddaughter so that he entrusted the heir's share together with the family traditional blessing in that Trust. I am the heir of my grandfather's line of this generation. （我爷爷方智仁是把他绝大部份的财产都给放在了他在香港替我设立的信托里，是因为受益人我是他孙女也是他的继承人，他给我设的这个信托既是他给我的礼物也是他给我作为继承人的继承人份额。我是方智仁这一支这一代的继承人。）
I am proud of my historical family, and I am blessed I came from a loving happy marriage. I already told everyone my family has been messy-looking since ancient times which gets messier and messier in the teleconferences in 2004, now I know it was since the Southern Tang dynasty which was about a thousand years ago, my Southern Tang Emperor grandfathers were famous in our hometown Nanjing area for their street-vendor appearances if not wearing their crowns.（我很为我的家世而骄傲，我很幸运我是出生在有爱的婚姻里。我在2004年就已经向全世界广而告之我们一家就是看着是瘪瘪遢遢的，现在我可是知道这瘪遢是从一千年前南唐时期就已经是这样了。我南唐皇帝的爷爷们在我的家乡南京是有名的不带王冠在街上晃悠的时候看着就像是街上的混混。）
I thought I already prepared the entire world about my family's messy appearance since 2004, why would I have any problem with my parents when I am the same messy? Definitely not being proud of being messy, I am a girl and I know for sure a complete change-over only takes a phone call to a good shopping specialist once I receive my living-expenses providing. （我还以为我都已经在2004年就给全世界就此打了个预防针，我哪里还会在乎我父母及我自己这瘪遢样子？这说法绝不是在为瘪遢骄傲，我是个女孩子，我很清楚一旦我的生活费用给付拿到，想要改头换面也就只需要打个电话给个好一点的购物专家就可以了。）
09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语）
----Sept 23rd, 2018
09-22-2018 中国组织的所谓演出似乎就是对着全球华人肆意当个诅咒的和哭丧的
中国自古就有家里死人的要声势浩大的哭丧表演的传统，而中国组织的这场演出号称是一切都是真实，也就是哭丧也是因为有真实丧事表演真实哭丧，针对真实人物表达真实诅咒。
从今年（2018年）的农历年三十开始，就有传言到处都是一片华人在表演嚎啕大哭的声音，这嚎啕丧哭直到农历新年结束，不知中国人民共和国如此表演哭丧，是中国政府里谁死了或者谁该死。
今天早上据说是电影演员陈坤和董洁在真实的表达诅咒，以他们自己一辈子永远不可能有个真正的家来表达对所谓如果某某有小孩是真实，这人也就一辈子只能如此地诅咒，就只是不知他们究竟是在诅咒谁。我方敏没声没音，就是因为还行。孩子今后和我一起生活也好，不和我一起生活也好，都是有人照顾也不担心孩子委屈，最多也就是担心孩子和我没感情或者被人教唆着对我狠三恨四的，我就自己想开，要是如此就再生几个和我亲的。
我现在也就是等着目前警方就我方敏是否被谋财者绑架勒索的司法调查有个眉目，我本人目前不是太清楚究竟是否是司法调查。/我所投诉的就是为什么我拿不到我所继承的信托所支付的生活费用，反正有人在处理。等目前这些事情结束，就凭我自己爷爷的祝福就是够资格找个年轻英俊的做个polygamist过我自己的甜美好日子，他们这些广而告之的诅咒也就是一场狗急跳墙的干嚎而已。
海外一直有传言，名导演张艺谋是中国这场实景演出的总导演，而我还听说我本人被广播剧公开宣布不可能是08奥运创意人就是因为张艺谋的老婆公开私下都如此表达。我对张艺谋的意见就是：瞧瞧，08奥运开幕式的特点是炫美华丽人文精粹，如今这广播剧整个就是哭穷讨饭拿钱来，摆明是在表达所谓张艺谋特色，就这，他老婆还说08奥运开幕式不是我的创意。
有人说最近这一阵子，广播剧制作都有海外89年学运的女生参与，那话就更多了。按照他们这些海外89年学运的宣布，我方敏早就已经被美国政府按照讹诈罪名起诉判罪被关在美国的联邦监狱里了。所有国内所听说的在海外华裔社区的种种说法，统统都是这些海外89年学运的宣布和分析。这些89年学运当年在国内是气势如虹轰轰烈烈，来到海外又都是特别人物特别待遇，据说女生们还都是被外族裔男士热追过，估计是实在难以平复那一腔的凭什么他们都不是些富豪名流的愤怒。
我也确实没看见过他们这些89年学运的。你们听听他们的计谋都是些什么呀，就是只要找个政府工作，以政府工作人员名义再以策略计谋的名头做这做那，只要木已成舟，就算是把个活人给上了手铐脚镣直接关在个黑屋子里，只要警察可以按照策略计谋的要求坚决就是不管，或者警察就是他们自己，老百姓就是一点办法都没有，一点办法都没有。你们说这是聪敏妙计谋还是刑事渎职罪？海外89年学运人士在海外华裔社区就是这个名声。当年二十岁的大学生，可以想象会如此幼稚，现在都快五十岁了，这是在表达他们才是真正有本事的啊？
广播剧上的海外华人所表达似乎全是如此，要是谈到我所享受的美国政府福利里的粮食卷政府楼，就只谈美国的福利相关法律说我不符合条件，却坚决不提我是美国的劳工相关法律所界定的理应从广播剧里有30亿-45亿美金收入的美国公民在法律协调期间符合享受美国政府帮助条件，他们还全都不是审批我是否够资格享受美国政府福利的美国政府工作人员，他们都是美国政府工作人员，就是都和我没什么关系，全部都是气势汹汹，必须要让我在餐馆做个洗碗的工作每个月可以挣个一千美金吃口饱饭。
我还听到，广播剧在宣传，要是我母亲还在，就必须得让外族裔人士给操了才能体现美国是个婚姻自由的国家，我本人认为我妈妈如果还在，就只能从英国王储威廉王子本人及美国的四星将军David Petraeus本人那里学学美国英国的真正婚姻自由。只有这两个人和我传过绯闻的人士是众所周知我非常非常喜欢的，一直很为其吃醋的高质量又有钱有品的高级上流社会 人物。要是他们两人在已经明确表态坚决永远不要我方敏之后，却愿意和我目前已经76岁的亲生妈妈恋爱恋爱的，这才会是被广大听众所认可的真正所有人都推崇的真正的恋爱自由，这才是由他们两个人所坚决支持的的广播剧所宣扬的真正的恋爱自由。其他任何人确实是统统都不够资格表达什么才是真正的恋爱自由。
妈妈，你要是还活着，你就只有是和英国王储威廉王子本人上床恋爱，你才可以被我理解，你就只是想要追求自由，你就只是想要证明你有恋爱的自由。全世界都知道，我很为英国王储威廉王子本人而吃醋不已。美国四星将军的年龄实在是有点不够资格体现真正的恋爱自由，就比我亲生妈妈小了十二岁而已，算什么呀。
我本人态度也就是：你们以绑架方式以表演手段污蔑造谣诽谤破化我方敏名誉，甚至以政府工作人员或者警方人员名义散布不实消息，就为毁灭我的一份感情一段婚姻并威胁我孩子的安全是我向美国警方投诉你们的原因，如果你们自己就是警方，你们自己也很清楚，美国警方也是有内部督察署的。
我方敏从来就不是嫁入豪门，我本人比我孩子爹家里富裕，我不是嫁入豪门也不担心害怕，今后我也还是那一份不愁没有英俊陪伴的浪漫婚姻家庭人生，你们的喧闹也就是一片过眼烟云，你们自己也很清楚，美国是一切法律。
----2018年9月22日。
09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments
A lot of people must have asked why I don't defend myself on the radio, I heard the explanation given is I lost my voice because of glasshouse cancer which is a true statement. I have complained about a lot of harassments to keep me in this "heavily flu-alike accented unrecognizable voice".
And, who are those attorneys on the radio? A lot are indeed sent by the female who publicly thrown a lot of shits at me to prove she is the real sexuality. Now you can imagine why it sounds some defenses are there but always effectively put me in the situation that has been "an overall disadvantaged enough" status. Some would say, but there are great points sometimes as well, well, that is my confusion as well if the intention is to keep the family name a bit decent.
Alright, but where are my attorneys if I am wealthy enough and financially independent enough as I claimed? They are obviously around because I am not crushed to pieces yet even though my financial identity is very confusing to the government sector as well. So, I am the one growing more and more comfortably quiet to wait for the things to be sorted out.
Exactly, what is the problem between me and the big family name? The maiden names.
Most involved are from maiden names that historically associated with my "financial identity". They are the Missy from the confused families who are so pissed off about my $400Million yearly living expenses providing and more. As you heard, the education from this radio program is the family name is the protection even if you performed a bank robbery as long as you make it clear in front the objective is the Chinese woman Min Fang's money only. And it seems the family names have dedicated promoting themselves as the role models for conducting real robberies to prove "nothing could be wrong even if it is truly a bank robbery (or murder for money) as long as Min Fang is the target." So, as I announced on this blog, I send the family names to the U.S. law enforcement already because I am so confused by this so impressive motive. But I did not call U.S. law enforcement's help on why every pissed off maiden name has been announced the true sexuality to the one & only family name I ever met, because I am indeed "not interested in a leftover sexuality."
So, what kind of confusion can be so impressively strong? I am not the person aware of a lot as well except the confusion is all about one company that has the $10,000 dollars per month story.
These maiden names anger has been:
They are the true owners of the paying company.
My anger has been:
I did not pick up any payment-checks in person from the paying company. All those payments were according to instructions from the paying companies' lawfully registered investor-owners. All by my entrusting groups' arrangement.
The result:
I have been shitted all over worldwide, and intended service providers have been harassed If dare to give out the payment money or provide any paid already service.
My hypothesis question:
Is the paying company the same company they truly own?
Evidential question: Why not confronting the paying company they truly own?
The action I have taken:
1: I asked U.S. laws protection on possible severe harassments and more.
2: I ask all confused families to do me a big favor to direct all their confusion to the paying company instead of me nor intended service providers.
By the way, why there is such an impressive expectation for me to pay to be disgusted as the never wanted who deserved to bow to the true sexuality?
Well, Rumored it was from the private assistant's family this was how my grandmother was requested by the private assistant's wife in exchange for my grandmother to be acknowledged as the private assistant's woman.
I have to say my grandmother was truly not pretty at all and truly fat enough after four children. Ever since marriage, she was the one under enormous pressure to be replaced instead of being wanted even by outsiders for most of her prime years, or more accurately, the entire marriage years. After all these years under my grandfather's "charitable touches out of the duty as the husband betrothed-before-birth" to share four children between them, she must have been desperate enough and proud enough when my grandfather finally made her the housewife with the family savings account.
These are truly a granddaughter's comments from the story I heard that she actually accepted my grandfather's private assistant who she was so despised as "smelly stunk". I am definitely not after her in every bit and my grandfather had paid it ￥20，000 RMB very clear in 1965.
*My grandmother died in 1958 or so. She was betrothed to my grandfather before both were born. My grandfather was a famous playboy refused to divorce his ugly wife for his love to his firstborn ( my father ).
(4：据说我爷爷在1965年去世时，把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产（两万元人名币左右）全部给了丁姓助理，就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年，就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ￥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
----published on September 18th, 2018 )
The Explanation to the Chinese community why I am the sole beneficiary? （对华裔社区所好奇的：为什么我是唯一的受益人？）
The answer: Inheriting according to the will (wills). （答案：是按遗嘱继承）。
爸爸妈妈：你们要是活得还挺好，我的门牌号（apartment#）是2494.
----Sept 21st, 2018
09-21-2018 Trust-Inheriting and Trust-Investing (信托继承和信托投资)
今天听懂了一些2004年7月1日参与会议者的那一份激和急“我坐在那里为什么没有继承到东西？” (Finally I understand why there are people so angry about how come sitting there as well on July 1st of 2004 but haven't inherited anything yet?)
他们不是在和我抢东西，他们以为那是一个集体继承仪式，所继承的不是他们家里老人留下的钱，而是他们自己过去交往过的社交朋友或者恋爱经历在那人自己去世时以继承的方式送给了他们什么礼物。虽然他们在2004年以前从未想过，但如果这个朋友有送礼物，他们怎么就是不可以或者就是不准拿这份礼物。(They are not trying to get what is mine. They thought it was a group inheriting that day, the inheritable was not from their family-seniors but from their own deceased social friends or romances as a gift. Even though they never expected such gifting before 2004, but why they are not allowed to inherit if there is such a gift and where are their inheritable now? )
我本人是在2004年6月30日继承了我的父系爷爷们替我所办理的信托，是按照遗嘱继承的。我当时虽然是在一个大的电话会议上，但不在同一个电话线上(類似一线, 二线这种), 而是另外一个电话会议。所以虽然当时有中国代表在场(在大的电话会议上)，但没有人知道我是否继承。我本人没有听说2004年7月1日时候有人是否继承。我确实不清楚. (I inherited some Trusts set up for me by my father-side grandfathers, it was according to each of my grandfather's will. Even though I was in a big teleconference but I was on a different line (such as line1. line 2, etc) with my grandfathers' entrusting groups so that nobody knew if I did inherit anything even though there were representatives from Chinese government presented in the big teleconference at the same time. I did not hear if there was such inheriting that day so I really don't know. )
Regarding this morning's some companies' ownership argument which is if the companies are investments of a Trust (Trusts) I inherited, I am not the person knows what might be the confusion. I am the acknowledged beneficiary person of the Trust (Trusts), but I am absolutely oblivious about its business entity's investing. Please direct all your confusion to the company. (至于今天早上有关公司所有权的争议, 即一些公司是否是由我所继承的一些信托所投资的, 我本人确实不清楚所争议的是什么. 我本人是法律所认可的这些信托的唯一受益人, 但我本人对于这些信托的投资运作完全不清楚. 请向引发争议的公司提出所有的困惑疑問.)
** 妈妈：要是你还在，以你自身经历 就不用太担心爸爸, 我听说他只有基本生活费，但有吃有住。我给的退休金还没有收到。我也在找爸爸的消息。听说爸爸也是因自身经历一直在找你的消息, 我也因为自身经历担心你和爸爸的生活, 已经向警方求助。
还有，听说有人一定要邀请老二的老婆或他们两人到美国，估计会有一些踩死你们的一些活动，请保护好自己。我已经就邀请方（据传是一个洛克菲勒夫人）如此执意介入我的私人生活及私人财物问题是否已是骚扰犯罪行为而报警处理。
另外，据说有人说爸爸是吃一口多一口，那可能和丁姓私人助理一家有关。听说爷爷就是因为答应了把你的那份两万左右的钱给他之后，才被救护车送进医院的，不是同一天。爷爷估计清楚才会说在医院说都怪他自己花钱太多了。
都是不知是否真实，但请保护好自己。我自己也已经向警方投诉华裔社区不知为什么就是不准我花我自己的钱，老逼着我去做低工资的工作挣口饭吃。
----Sept 20th, 2018
09-19-2018 My living-enough mother and Trust-Inheriting
If alive, my mother should be over 76 years old and my father would be over 86 years old, why I need to scream about my mother's sexuality? That is for the leftover portion from the $400Million per year medical expense. So, I make my announcement here: All the accumulated leftover from the $400Million per year medical expenses of my both parents should be transferred back to my name.
----Min Fang 09/19/2018
Without this $400Million per year medical expenses arrangement, my mother's sexuality advantage in legal immigration status and retirement arrangement would be only attractive to "shabby looking man" or the truly homeless, this is indeed true from my own personal experiences. This is because every man else would be wanted by a so much better female that even touching or talking would arouse serious jealous reaction (from my real-life experience), but money hand-over would be tolerable and expected (from rumor-stories style education I have received).
So, I say to my obviously living-enough mother: Don't worry about your sexuality, whoever has an eye for you normally would be persuaded away before a Mister can have an opportunity to see you close enough or before you have ever heard of the Mister. This comforting message is from my own real rich experiences.
Also, the confusion between family-inheriting and Trust-inheriting. The questions are:
1: How can I choose Trust-Inheriting when I have relatives.
I did not choose. It was chosen by the deceased, never by the living. Inheriting is the process of the wealth's ownership change. Family-inheriting means the ownership immediate change from the deceased to the living upon death, by will or no will from the deceased.
Trust-Inheriting means the deceased had intentionally transferred the ownership to the intermedium party to look after the wealth before ownership to be transferred to the intended beneficiary by the will (the Settler's letter). The Trust-inheriting normally happen years after the death.
2: Why I did not inform relatives.
I did forget my inheriting in 2004 so I did not inform anyone. Also, I have no contact information to contact nor inheriting related information in 2015. So I informed everyone on this blog since 2017.
3: Why my brother's wife is not my in-law.
My brother stays in his marriage as his free will even though I heard it is public already that she mothers another man's child. I doubted if this freedom of marriage was the excuse that caused my parents' death-certificates ousted from my parents' own apartment. I am not willing to risk my own living nor my own life as long as I have this doubts. And I already wrote letters to the related places to announce myself have nothing to do with my brother's marriage and his in-laws. So, my brother's wife is not my in-law is factually effective.
4: What will happen if my brother's wife is invited to insult me as you heard on the radio wherever I need to present by those so publicly well-known enemies of mine?
As you heard on the radio, she has been obviously strongly supported by her child's birth father to insult his wife publicly. She may also have been supported by the similar party from the Rockefeller name for possibly similar reasons to insult their own.
I have nothing to do with all parties above and I don't care, but I have "entitled" my brother's wife an "outer public-bathroom" from her mating-pregnancy rumor, and I don't like to be insulted as you have heard on the radio as well for whatever true reasons.
So, I would understand the invitation to her is the public eviction message to me from the host for a lady-inappropriate reason if I am a visitor to a non-public-mating related event.
If the event is hosted in my own place, I would have to ask the inviting patron to publicly expose the personal private area to be convinceable of the true needs for the invitation to the entitled "outer public-bathroom" to a non-public-mating related event to be evicted for mating with her.at some other places.
----September 19th, 2018
09-18-2018 有关私人助理的传言以及月经血计谋 (Rumors about the private assistant and the strategy of period blood)
听说了今天早上的播出是中国政府代表所强调的：如果我妈妈还活着，就没可能没有她自己的男人。据说这是中国政府所推广的“这才叫婚姻自由”。
I heard of this morning's broadcasting that Chinese government's representatives emphasized: If my mother indeed still alive, it is impossible that she still does not have a man of her own. It is rumored this is the theme of this propaganda from the Chinese government "Freedom of marriage."
据说特意会以这种中国聪明中国策略让我父母必须以已经死亡身份离开中国，就可以让我父母永远不再是夫妻而让他们自己这群靠着舔女人月经血才能有口饭吃的可以有机会吃口饱饭。所以我说中国政府的这一政治局根本就是特别选拔的全世界都知道的典型传统的妓院婊子才养得出来杂种组成的公共厕所政治局。
It is rumored that it was from the Chinese strategy and the Chinese smartness that my parents left China with real death certificates. It was intended to break their marriage in order to fill-in replacements from their own who are willing to suck money out from the period blood. This is precisely the reason I say this administration is the specially selected group, according to worldwide standard of traditions, the public bathroom of whore-born mother-fuckers.
所以我说这届中国政府根本是篡党夺权，就因我从自己的亲身经历，我很相信海外传言他们就是靠着共舔一泉月经血才被特意提拔成为这一届中国政府中共中央政治局的，他们的才华就是共舔一腔月经血，哪里会听得懂党纪国法或者科学技术都是什么意思，你就听见他们在使劲用中国外交部中国人民解放军的实力帮着卖髀抢鲷了。那才叫只要广播一响，全世界都知道那是中国那一群口舔月经血的外交解放大军都是在帮着脱衣卖髀呐。
This is exactly the reason I say this administration of the Chinese government is the result of usurping, it is from my own personal experiences, I truly believe it is possible as rumored that this administration (Central Political Committee) is specially grouped from one-woman's period-blood enjoyers. If their talents recognized are enjoying one-woman's period as a group, why should anyone expect them to understand laws or regulations, or anything else? All one could hear is the joint-power from the Chinese Military and Chinese Liberation Army and how hard it is to liberate the breasts and butts for everyone to enjoy the joy of sucking some period-blood. It has been such a phenomenon for the world to listen what a joy it would be to be liberated for period-blood sucking.
所以，我只好郑重声明：我替我母亲我父亲所安排的一切都是不可以由其婚姻另一方或其他子女所继承福利，包括目前及未来的医疗保险及退休金房子等所有安排。我希望我自己的父母如果还活着，看到这个博客可以保护好他们自己。
So, I make my announcement here: All the arrangements I made for my birth parents (including medical insurance, retirement financial arrangement, housing, etc) cannot be inherited by their marriage partners if they have, nor their other child, nor step-children if they have. I wish they could read this blog to protect themselves if they are still alive.
全是这种妓院狗屎公共马桶货言论居然被公然叫做新文化运动。完全违反本人意愿，被政府及文化部门公然绑架强迫逼迫所谓名人必须做这种娼妓文化运动的表率，就因为他们自己是一群真真实实婊子养的妓女妓男。
All these low cast shits are now be called new culture movement. Completely ignore one's own willingness, but purely abusive abducting efforts from the government to force so-called Famous people to be the Role Models of the True Shits, just because themselves are the true whore-born toilets' shits.
我是不会愿意看见我爷爷对我的祝福被靠舔月经血的给坑蒙拐骗了。我妈要是还在，还真是已经够老了，76岁了，没那月经血可以被人舔，我也绝不会用我爷爷给我的钱给那恶心讨饭的一口舔了月经的饱饭钱。
I am not willing to watch my grandfathers' blessing to me to be abused by those period-suckers. If my mother still alive, she is really old enough (76 years old now) to have any period blood. I refuse to pay any of my grandfathers' entrusted money I inherited to such disgusting period-sucker beggars.
----方敏于2018年9月18日。
据说，这些都是因为我爷爷的那个私人助理和我奶奶有性交关系。1949年时,已育有四名子女的我奶奶都已经37岁了又黑又丑又胖，但就是嘴馋爱偷吃。我听说的：
It is rumored, all these was because that my grandmother had sexually involved with the private assistant. Being a mother of four, my not-pretty at all grandmother was already 37 years old and fat enough, but it seems she just had this lust-appetite. What I have heard are the following:
1： 据说我奶奶和那个私人助理的偷情关系是我父亲1956年在上海长居期间，就是不够资格参加我爷爷付款的每日家庭晚餐的原因，而由我奶奶自愿自己留在家里做点给我父亲吃吃，然后我奶奶再自己一个人加入由我爷爷付款的家庭晚餐。
!: It is rumored this sexual involvement was the reason that my father was not allowed to attend daily family dinner function which had been financed entirely by my grandfather. It is said that my grandmother would voluntarily prepare something for my father to eat at home but herself would join the family dinner function later.
2：我知道的，我奶奶共育有四名子女，我父亲和我父亲的小妹妹随我爷爷长相，我父亲的大妹妹和弟弟随我奶奶长相。我听说的：据说是我奶奶自己对我父亲的弟弟说丁姓私人助理就和父亲一样。但丁姓私人助理是在我父亲的弟弟已经8岁以后才被我爷爷雇佣的。
2: What I know: My grandmother gave birth to total four children, my father and my father's younger sister were obviously resemble my grandfather, the other two obviously resemble my grandmother herself. What I heard: It was my grandmother herself told her younger son that the private assistant was the father equivalent. But the private assistant was hired when my father's younger brother was already about 8 years old.
3：我爷爷据说是在1948年替我在香港设立了五百万大洋（一千五百万美金）的信托后，就把家里剩余财产（20万左右的大洋）全部放在了我奶奶的名下，但在我奶奶1957年左右因病住院期间，又紧急转回我爷爷自己名下。
3: It is said that my grandfather had put all that was had left (200,000 Dayang) to my grandmother's name after he set up the Trust for me in Hong Kong (500Million Dayang, $15 Million U.S.dollar). But he had to transferred all back to his own name when my grandmother was hospitalized in 1957.
4：据说我爷爷在1965年去世时，把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产（两万元人名币左右）全部给了丁姓助理，就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年，就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ￥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
5：我还想补充说一下，据我所听说的，如果我父亲不是我奶奶的头胎子，就算我奶奶很漂亮，我爷爷都一定会被张爱玲的父亲逼着离婚的。众所周知，张爱玲自传就提到当年19岁20岁的张爱玲为情自杀，她父亲是千里迢迢到上海找那富家子算账未果。我奶奶娘家可是没有一点家世背景的，而我爷爷家自古就有继承人的母亲是母后娘娘的传统，否则，世家子弟的张爱玲父亲是绝不会善罢甘休的。据说我爷爷当时是愿娶，但张爱玲绝不肯做小。
5: I want to add a bit more here: From the rumors I heard, if my father was not my grandmother's first born, my grandfather would be forced to have a divorce even if my grandmother was a rare beauty. From the famous Chinese writer's autography, Miss Zhang committed suicide when she was 19 or 20 years old, her father went to Shanghai to take care of the matter but got no results. My grandmother was not from a huge name nor a big house, but my grandfather's family has this tradition historically that the mother of the heir has a King Mother's privilege. Otherwise, Zhang's father, who was from a historic house as well, wouldn't swallow her daughter's miserable experience. It is rumored that my grandfather was willing to wed her but she was not willing without his divorce.
6：至于为什么私人助理家里及我父亲的弟妹们都认为我奶奶是会为了丁姓私人助理而放弃她自己所育所养亲生子女利益的，我还没听说这情有多深，但似乎这是目前上海普遍共识，也就是我爷爷的一切是我奶奶会愿意统统都给丁姓私人助理的。
6: Regarding why the private assistant's family or my father's siblings have assumed my granmother would choose the private assistant over her own borns, I have not heard their romance story yet to know how deeply they were involved. But it seems it is widely understood in Shanghai that my grandmother would willing to give everything that my grandfather had owned to the private assistant instead of her own borns,
7：我本人郑重声明我爷爷方智仁1948年替我在香港设立的信托从未被我奶奶向其他人提及，我爷爷方智仁也从未更改过该信托。我本人已经在2004年6月30日继承该信托。我爷爷奶奶的婚姻是他们自己的问题。----方敏
7: So, I make my announcement here: The Trust my grandfather Fang, Zhiren set up for me was never bleached by my grandmother, my grandfather never changed his settler's will as well. I inherited this Trust on June 30th of 2004. My grandparents' marriage is their own story.
---- 2018年9月18日。
09-17-2018 The Ownership Confusion and the Infamous Private Assistant
There are some questions if my parents need to pay income taxes if they still alive and have received the "retirement plan" payment. They don't need to. It is the same if one support one's parents or child on a monthly basis while living separately, it is still one's taxed-income that used to support the family. It is a retirement plan that I bought to support their living expenses which are paid by my Trusts. The payment is a portion of my income that is after investor-tax already.
I Also heard about this morning's broadcasting of the argument about R Fund. I have no idea what the argument is about. My inheriting is Trust-Inheriting which means I inherited some Trusts. The Trust is similar to a 401K retirement plan in a lot of ways. It is a monthly deposit from an employed to a 401K plan in order to have good future monthly income, my Trust is a onetime deposit done by my grandfather so that I can have handsome yearly income; The retired wish good monthly payment can be received from the 401K plan but don't really know how it can be achieved or what might have happened during the investment, I am the same. I have great entrusting & business groups to take care of investments, I am good without knowing details. It is true I have announced some investments related to 4 Trusts I inherited because I need to complain about the rumors I heard which is I am provided via them, but how come I have not received any money to cover my living expenses yet.
This is precisely the reason why I am asking every confused family to keep an eye on their younger ones. All these providing via those paying companies are done through my entrusting groups' arrangements in order to provide for my living expenses, I am currently living on welfare because of some confusions from the business investment I have no idea of. I am asking these confused families to do me a favor to direct all your confusion about the lawful ownership of paying companies to your attorneys or to the paying companies. Please tell your younger generation don't take my money unless they have the lawful evidence to prove the payment amount is not from my entrusted-money.
About the private assistant family, this is the family I never heard of even I spent five years in their home-city Shanghai, I need to save my food expenses from my ￥50 monthly living expense while they could have about $8000 per month (in U.S. dollar, the exchange rate was $1 > ￥6 ) was possibly the reason I was never introduced. I never heard of this private assistant's family before my mother's wedding gift story is a True statement. I never had anything to do with this private assistant family is a Trust statement as well.
All I heard about this private assistant have been the following:
1: He started to work for my grandfather as a private assistant after my father joined the Chinese Army in 1949. His family name was different from his birth father's,
2: He started to join my grandparents' family breakfast & dinner daily in a year or so and how, one by one, he brought in his wife and his children daily until my grandfather passed away in 1965.
3: In 1965, He insisted on being a member in family-inheriting which was my father's share. My father has been famous for did not get a penny at all from my rich grandfather.
4: In 1966, He sent my mother's wedding gift from my grandfather's friends to Nanjing city which was taken later, which was every piece, by his girlfriend from my mother's maiden sister's house. It is rumored that is a mother of one of his illegitimate children.
5: In 1967, he detained my $10,000 living-expense providing which had been paid by a Ford's holding investor since July 31st of 1967 till October of 1996. This was the period of the entire time since I was born until I left China came to the United States. The amount this private assistant detained was $9000 in U.S. dollar per month between 1967 to mid-70s, and $8000 in U.S. dollar per month from mid-70s till October of 1996.
6: In March to September of 2018, I heard his children and his relatives have been fighting for their "deservedness to own at least some shares" of the $10,000 story's paying company which has been Ford's Holding investor-company.
7: Today, September 17th of 2018, I heard his children are fighting currently to have the "deserved ownership power" over a Rockefeller Holding's investor-company.
8: Plus, how despised this private assistant's family has been towards my grandmother, my father and I.
----September 17, 2018
About the private assistant family, this is the family I never heard of even I spent five years in their home-city Shanghai, I need to save my food expenses from my ￥50 monthly living expense while they could have about $8000 per month (in U.S. dollar, the exchange rate was $1 > ￥6 ) was possibly the reason I was never introduced. I never heard of this private assistant's family before my mother's wedding gift story is a True statement. I never had anything to do with this private assistant family is a Trust statement as well.
All I heard about this private assistant have been the following:
1: He started to work for my grandfather as a private assistant after my father joined the Chinese Army in 1949. His family name was different from his birth father's,
2: He started to join my grandparents' family breakfast & dinner daily in a year or so and how, one by one, he brought in his wife and his children daily until my grandfather passed away in 1965.
3: In 1965, He insisted on being a member in family-inheriting which was my father's share. My father has been famous for did not get a penny at all from my rich grandfather.
4: In 1966, He sent my mother's wedding gift from my grandfather's friends to Nanjing city which was taken later, which was every piece, by his girlfriend from my mother's maiden sister's house. It is rumored that is a mother of one of his illegitimate children.
5: In 1967, he detained my $10,000 living-expense providing which had been paid by a Ford's holding investor since July 31st of 1967 till October of 1996. This was the period of the entire time since I was born until I left China came to the United States. The amount this private assistant detained was $9000 in U.S. dollar per month between 1967 to mid-70s, and $8000 in U.S. dollar per month from mid-70s till October of 1996.
6: In March to September of 2018, I heard his children and his relatives have been fighting for their "deservedness to own at least some shares" of the $10,000 story's paying company which has been Ford's Holding investor-company.
7: Today, September 17th of 2018, I heard his children are fighting currently to have the "deserved ownership power" over a Rockefeller Holding's investor-company.
8: Plus, how despised this private assistant's family has been towards my grandmother, my father and I.
----September 17, 2018
09-16-2018 如果自己家里有曾经在国外办理过信托之类的故事，应该如何查询。（How to inquire if you have a family story of entrusting)
就我知道的，信托是有专门的法律登记处的，但零零总总到处都是，所以最好是通过当地警方查询。举例：如果家里的故事是家里的老人是在香港办理的信托，这个信托里的钱如果是在香港进行投资的话，应该会有在香港的工商登记，但信托登记本身却有可能是在香港，大英帝国的英国本土，加拿大，澳大利亚等等的各个城市以及各个州郡政府，所以通过英国警方查询比较现实。(From what I learned so far, there is also a government registry for Trust all over the places. Example, If your family story is a Trust set up in Hong Kong, there would be a commercial registry if the money has been investing in Hong Kong, but the Trust registry itself can be in Hong Kong, cities or counties in the UK, Canada or Australia, etc.) It is obviously more practical to inquiry through the government's law system.
我自己的查询是通过写信给美国的FBI，我的信托管理人没有问题，因为我所求助的其实是为什么在我2004继承之后没有按时收到生活费用给付，但生活费用给付钱款其实已经按时按决定汇出，所以不是信托管理人的问题，至于究竟什么原因造成， 除了我前几天博文所谈到的钱财的法律拥有权困扰之外还有什么原因，也还在处理当中。如果有意向警方写信求助的，我估计警方的调查就是如此进行，牵涉法律的问题警方按照法律进行处理，其他民事管理问题就是通知信托管理人处理（比如通知受益人继承信托，等等）。我是2015年1月开始向FBI写信谈我的信托继承经历并尽可能地提供我所知道的线索。(I started my own inquiry since January of 2015 by writing letters to FBI referenced with everything I remembered about my inheriting experience. My entrusting-groups are good because my exact inquiry was why I have not received the expected living-providing after my 2004 inheriting. Currently, what I heard is all the living-providing has been provided by the Trusts on-time and as decided on July 1st of 2004. So, my inquiry has nothing to do with my entrusting groups, but it seems what might be the reasons, other than investing-ownership confusion, that caused the delay of my receipt of the money is still under investigation. I assume this is how the investigation is conducted if one send such inquiry to laws: Investigators take care of those matters that are beyond civil disputes but leave everything else to the entrusting-group (such matter as it would be the entrusting-group to inform the inquirer to inherit. etc.).
我和华裔社区及中国政府的矛盾就在于自2004年起，他们就全跑到工商登记那里”查证“2004年的会议内容，然后对着信托所投资的企业嚎叫不停。如果对于我是否应该是唯一受益人持异议，也应通过警方查询，而不是他们自己凭着资讯公开的工商登记资料在没有任何法律依据的情况下要求必须以投资人身份拥有并管理信托所投资的企业。就我所听说的，更大的问题是，当地警方进行查询的结果已经向他们解释，按照法律以及信托设立人的遗嘱，他们确实不是信托的受益人，他们的反应似乎是咬牙切齿“就是不信”，我听到的是一片“就是没法理解，就是 必须解决”。(My issue with Chinese communities abroad and the Chinese government is: Since 2004, they all went to the commercial registry to validate what they heard from 2004's meetings and yell at Trusts-investments ever since. If the dispute is if I am the sole beneficiary, the inquiry should be conducted through law enforcement instead of checking the public records of the commercial registry and insisted on to own and to manage the investment company as an investor but without any legal validating documents of their ownerships nor any valid authorization. According to what I heard, the bigger issue is: After the local law enforcement has answered their inquiry and has told them they are not the beneficiary person according to the Trust's Settler's will and local Trust & Inheriting laws, it seems their reactions were only grudging teeth and refusal to acknowledge, all I heard are all about "it is hard to understand that inheriting can be like this, this dispute has to be resolved." )
有什么需要他们理解的？有什么必须要解决的？作为钱财的主人，信托设立人爷爷当年没打算把钱给他们，信托唯一受益人的我如今也没打算把钱给他们，就凭着法律，就凭财产所有权的法律归属就已经很明确了，哪里还需要向他们特别解释？凭什么必须要我拿钱出来必须解决他们的要求？(Who and what needs their understanding? What needs to be resolved? Being the lawful owner of the money, my grandfather was the Seller of the Trust who had no intention to give them that money, I am the beneficiary person who has no intention to give them that money. This is very clear already by law and by lawful ownership, why I owe them a special explanation? Why I have to give out my money as they demanded to resolve their own dispute?)
他们那支的家里老人作为设立人的儿子在设立人爷爷去世的当年就有分到过家产，他们自己当时也还没生出来，设立人爷爷哪里会需要他们理解？我本人根本不认识他们也没听说过他们，我哪里会需要他们理解？凭什么就是需要我给个解释，解释什么？他们拿不到他们想要的钱，就是坚决没法理解还事不罢休，这不是敲诈勒索是什么？结果是中国政府出面撑腰助阵的漫天痛骂，“凭什么就你有钱？” 就这，我和中国政府能没矛盾吗？(Being a son to the Settler, their branch's senior had the family inheriting at the year when the Settler passed away, and themselves were not born yet, why would the Settler need their understanding? I never even heard of their existence, why I need their understanding? Why I have to give them an explanation? what I need to explain to them? And the attitude is all won't stop till I resolve this dispute by backing off from claiming sole beneficiary and give them the money. Is this an effort of extortion or what? And as you heard, all these shits of anger flying all-over by the strong support from the Chinese government. "How dare you say it is all your money?" Now you can imagine how huge the issue has been.)
他们当中，很多人和我还没血缘关系，他们就是抱怨对钱的法律上的归属弄不清，究竟是那笔钱他们弄不清？什么原因弄不清？钱财的拥有权是有明确法律所严格规范的，为什么不上民事法庭打诉讼官司，或要求刑事调查？( A lot of them don't even have any blood association with me. They are just so confused about who owns the money. Exactly, what money? for what reason? Money's ownership is strictly regulated by laws, why not files a civil lawsuit or request a criminal investigation?)
按照各国法律，所有从事商业经营的机构及个人必须进行工商登记。所有办理过工商注册登记的合法公司的利润都是按照当地法律必须交给其在工商注册上有效登记的合法投资人的。在中国也是如此。就没有任何一家合法有效注册的公司是没有法律上的合法拥有者的。(According to laws of most of the countries, all commercial activities need to be registered lawfully through the commercial registry. All lawfully registered organizations have each's lawfully registered investor-owner. This is the same in China as well. There is no such lawfully registered organization that does not have a lawful registered investor-owner. )
这些人一口一声说那些公司包括那些公司的利润所得就根本没有任何投资人在合法拥有着，也就是说那些公司的员工全是痴呆，一年到头上班就只拿工资奖金, 他们作为一个就只是想要钱的外国人而已，就可以对着公司员工吆喝必须必须拿钱来，公司员工就必须必须把利润所得给他们，还不给就是不行，因为公司员工就是必须解决他们这个”就是不明白就是不理解“的问题？这还就只是因为他们是中国公民而已，这世上有个中国政府还有个中国外交部而已？他们这些人还很奇怪为什么会有几十个国家都是由各个政府在大声强调都是有法律有政府的国家？美国英国法国西班牙当时都已经大声强调不光都有政府，还都有军队啦。(Their saying is all those companies don't even have a lawful owner to take in profits or to own the companies' assets. So it is equally saying those who work for those companies are all so stupid to work full time all year-round to take in only salaries & bonus. And them, being complete foreigners who just want some money, of course, should yell at those stupid people to demand some money, and to expect the demand to be fulfilled as a mandatory order, because it is those stupid people's obligation to resolve the dispute of "hard to understand why it can't be so". And, it seems this is all because they came from China, and China has a government equipped with a Foreign department. So, as you heard, the U.S. the U.K, France and Spain, all have to use high-pitched voices to emphasize each have a government as well and each equipped with the military.)
还有，我是在2004年美国东部时间的6月30日继承，不是2004年的7月1日，我本人对于2004年7月1日当天是否有人继承财产也完全不清楚。如果有人在2004年7月1日参加了电讯会议认为是在继承钱财，请向其他人士查询。2004年的6月30日及7月1日的会议类似于政府机关或者公司的大会议室办公，你办你的，我版我的，参加会议的来访人都是由各自的接待人员处理各自的问题的，清清楚楚。如果你在那天的会议上应该有财产可以继承，那天的会议上就会有知道你所继承的的应该是些什么财产的接待人员。(Also, my inheriting was on June 30th of 2004 (U.S. Eastern time), not July 1st of 2004. I did not hear if there is anyone inheriting on July 1st of 2004 as well, please inquire someone if there is any question regarding a possible July 1st of 2004 inheriting. The June 30th and July 1st meetings were similar to the one-hall office that each visitor had own recipient to take care each's matter. If you were there to inherit, somebody there should know what your inheritable were.)
我本人不是在2004年的7月1日继承的（美国时间），也没听说过那天是否有人在会议上继承财产，所以请不要因为你们自己的钱财继承困扰对我本人及向我提供服务的机构实施骚扰。如果对我方敏有钱感到困扰，请向美国警方提供线索法律依据为何我有钱会让你困扰。(My own inheriting was not on July 1st of 2004 and I did not hear any inheriting rumor from that day, so please do not harass me nor my service providers if you have your own inheriting-confusion about July 1st of 2004. If why I have money is what confuse you, please tip the U.S. law enforcement about reasons)
----2018年9月16日。
我自己的查询是通过写信给美国的FBI，我的信托管理人没有问题，因为我所求助的其实是为什么在我2004继承之后没有按时收到生活费用给付，但生活费用给付钱款其实已经按时按决定汇出，所以不是信托管理人的问题，至于究竟什么原因造成， 除了我前几天博文所谈到的钱财的法律拥有权困扰之外还有什么原因，也还在处理当中。如果有意向警方写信求助的，我估计警方的调查就是如此进行，牵涉法律的问题警方按照法律进行处理，其他民事管理问题就是通知信托管理人处理（比如通知受益人继承信托，等等）。我是2015年1月开始向FBI写信谈我的信托继承经历并尽可能地提供我所知道的线索。(I started my own inquiry since January of 2015 by writing letters to FBI referenced with everything I remembered about my inheriting experience. My entrusting-groups are good because my exact inquiry was why I have not received the expected living-providing after my 2004 inheriting. Currently, what I heard is all the living-providing has been provided by the Trusts on-time and as decided on July 1st of 2004. So, my inquiry has nothing to do with my entrusting groups, but it seems what might be the reasons, other than investing-ownership confusion, that caused the delay of my receipt of the money is still under investigation. I assume this is how the investigation is conducted if one send such inquiry to laws: Investigators take care of those matters that are beyond civil disputes but leave everything else to the entrusting-group (such matter as it would be the entrusting-group to inform the inquirer to inherit. etc.).
我和华裔社区及中国政府的矛盾就在于自2004年起，他们就全跑到工商登记那里”查证“2004年的会议内容，然后对着信托所投资的企业嚎叫不停。如果对于我是否应该是唯一受益人持异议，也应通过警方查询，而不是他们自己凭着资讯公开的工商登记资料在没有任何法律依据的情况下要求必须以投资人身份拥有并管理信托所投资的企业。就我所听说的，更大的问题是，当地警方进行查询的结果已经向他们解释，按照法律以及信托设立人的遗嘱，他们确实不是信托的受益人，他们的反应似乎是咬牙切齿“就是不信”，我听到的是一片“就是没法理解，就是 必须解决”。(My issue with Chinese communities abroad and the Chinese government is: Since 2004, they all went to the commercial registry to validate what they heard from 2004's meetings and yell at Trusts-investments ever since. If the dispute is if I am the sole beneficiary, the inquiry should be conducted through law enforcement instead of checking the public records of the commercial registry and insisted on to own and to manage the investment company as an investor but without any legal validating documents of their ownerships nor any valid authorization. According to what I heard, the bigger issue is: After the local law enforcement has answered their inquiry and has told them they are not the beneficiary person according to the Trust's Settler's will and local Trust & Inheriting laws, it seems their reactions were only grudging teeth and refusal to acknowledge, all I heard are all about "it is hard to understand that inheriting can be like this, this dispute has to be resolved." )
有什么需要他们理解的？有什么必须要解决的？作为钱财的主人，信托设立人爷爷当年没打算把钱给他们，信托唯一受益人的我如今也没打算把钱给他们，就凭着法律，就凭财产所有权的法律归属就已经很明确了，哪里还需要向他们特别解释？凭什么必须要我拿钱出来必须解决他们的要求？(Who and what needs their understanding? What needs to be resolved? Being the lawful owner of the money, my grandfather was the Seller of the Trust who had no intention to give them that money, I am the beneficiary person who has no intention to give them that money. This is very clear already by law and by lawful ownership, why I owe them a special explanation? Why I have to give out my money as they demanded to resolve their own dispute?)
他们那支的家里老人作为设立人的儿子在设立人爷爷去世的当年就有分到过家产，他们自己当时也还没生出来，设立人爷爷哪里会需要他们理解？我本人根本不认识他们也没听说过他们，我哪里会需要他们理解？凭什么就是需要我给个解释，解释什么？他们拿不到他们想要的钱，就是坚决没法理解还事不罢休，这不是敲诈勒索是什么？结果是中国政府出面撑腰助阵的漫天痛骂，“凭什么就你有钱？” 就这，我和中国政府能没矛盾吗？(Being a son to the Settler, their branch's senior had the family inheriting at the year when the Settler passed away, and themselves were not born yet, why would the Settler need their understanding? I never even heard of their existence, why I need their understanding? Why I have to give them an explanation? what I need to explain to them? And the attitude is all won't stop till I resolve this dispute by backing off from claiming sole beneficiary and give them the money. Is this an effort of extortion or what? And as you heard, all these shits of anger flying all-over by the strong support from the Chinese government. "How dare you say it is all your money?" Now you can imagine how huge the issue has been.)
他们当中，很多人和我还没血缘关系，他们就是抱怨对钱的法律上的归属弄不清，究竟是那笔钱他们弄不清？什么原因弄不清？钱财的拥有权是有明确法律所严格规范的，为什么不上民事法庭打诉讼官司，或要求刑事调查？( A lot of them don't even have any blood association with me. They are just so confused about who owns the money. Exactly, what money? for what reason? Money's ownership is strictly regulated by laws, why not files a civil lawsuit or request a criminal investigation?)
按照各国法律，所有从事商业经营的机构及个人必须进行工商登记。所有办理过工商注册登记的合法公司的利润都是按照当地法律必须交给其在工商注册上有效登记的合法投资人的。在中国也是如此。就没有任何一家合法有效注册的公司是没有法律上的合法拥有者的。(According to laws of most of the countries, all commercial activities need to be registered lawfully through the commercial registry. All lawfully registered organizations have each's lawfully registered investor-owner. This is the same in China as well. There is no such lawfully registered organization that does not have a lawful registered investor-owner. )
这些人一口一声说那些公司包括那些公司的利润所得就根本没有任何投资人在合法拥有着，也就是说那些公司的员工全是痴呆，一年到头上班就只拿工资奖金, 他们作为一个就只是想要钱的外国人而已，就可以对着公司员工吆喝必须必须拿钱来，公司员工就必须必须把利润所得给他们，还不给就是不行，因为公司员工就是必须解决他们这个”就是不明白就是不理解“的问题？这还就只是因为他们是中国公民而已，这世上有个中国政府还有个中国外交部而已？他们这些人还很奇怪为什么会有几十个国家都是由各个政府在大声强调都是有法律有政府的国家？美国英国法国西班牙当时都已经大声强调不光都有政府，还都有军队啦。(Their saying is all those companies don't even have a lawful owner to take in profits or to own the companies' assets. So it is equally saying those who work for those companies are all so stupid to work full time all year-round to take in only salaries & bonus. And them, being complete foreigners who just want some money, of course, should yell at those stupid people to demand some money, and to expect the demand to be fulfilled as a mandatory order, because it is those stupid people's obligation to resolve the dispute of "hard to understand why it can't be so". And, it seems this is all because they came from China, and China has a government equipped with a Foreign department. So, as you heard, the U.S. the U.K, France and Spain, all have to use high-pitched voices to emphasize each have a government as well and each equipped with the military.)
还有，我是在2004年美国东部时间的6月30日继承，不是2004年的7月1日，我本人对于2004年7月1日当天是否有人继承财产也完全不清楚。如果有人在2004年7月1日参加了电讯会议认为是在继承钱财，请向其他人士查询。2004年的6月30日及7月1日的会议类似于政府机关或者公司的大会议室办公，你办你的，我版我的，参加会议的来访人都是由各自的接待人员处理各自的问题的，清清楚楚。如果你在那天的会议上应该有财产可以继承，那天的会议上就会有知道你所继承的的应该是些什么财产的接待人员。(Also, my inheriting was on June 30th of 2004 (U.S. Eastern time), not July 1st of 2004. I did not hear if there is anyone inheriting on July 1st of 2004 as well, please inquire someone if there is any question regarding a possible July 1st of 2004 inheriting. The June 30th and July 1st meetings were similar to the one-hall office that each visitor had own recipient to take care each's matter. If you were there to inherit, somebody there should know what your inheritable were.)
我本人不是在2004年的7月1日继承的（美国时间），也没听说过那天是否有人在会议上继承财产，所以请不要因为你们自己的钱财继承困扰对我本人及向我提供服务的机构实施骚扰。如果对我方敏有钱感到困扰，请向美国警方提供线索法律依据为何我有钱会让你困扰。(My own inheriting was not on July 1st of 2004 and I did not hear any inheriting rumor from that day, so please do not harass me nor my service providers if you have your own inheriting-confusion about July 1st of 2004. If why I have money is what confuse you, please tip the U.S. law enforcement about reasons)
----2018年9月16日。
09-15-2018 If my mother has been well (如果我妈妈一直都生活的挺好的）
I agree she just needs to take good care of herself; 我同意她就只要照顾好她自己就可以了，
I agree she just needs to find my father to take good care of my father;我同意她就只要找到我爸爸照顾好我爸爸就可以了；
I wish her to be happy as she has been for the years to come; 我希望她就这样快快乐乐的直到永远，
I wish her to be healthier and healthier in the years to come; 我希望她在未来的日子里健健康康的直到永远；
I say, Papa and Mama:
your permanent financial independence from pension-providing are ensured already;
我会说：
爸爸妈妈，让你们经济可以永远独立的退休金供给已经保障了。
your permanent financial independence from pension-providing are ensured already;
我会说：
爸爸妈妈，让你们经济可以永远独立的退休金供给已经保障了。
Mama, enjoy your affluence as you wish and forever;妈妈，请按你心愿好好享受你所满意的富足生活，会永远如此，
Papa, enjoy your independence with Mama before I reach out to dictate you both. 爸爸，在我对你们指手画脚之前，请和妈妈一起好好享受你们的这份独立生活。
----Sept 15th, 2018
About this morning's broadcasting of why a lot of Chinese are so angry with me. （有关今天早上所播出的为何华人很讨厌我）
1: Chinese dislike radio broadcasting of those fake romances, （1：华人不喜欢广播上的假恋爱故事）
My saying: I have complained to laws about possible sexual harassment.（我已经向法律投诉是否这是性骚扰。）
2: Chinese dislike I say I have achievements.（2： 华人不喜欢我说我有成就）
My saying: I have complained to the laws about if broadcasting those blackmails to denial my achievement is to take over my intellectual income. （我已经向法律投诉广播所播出一些内容是否是在造谣诽谤对我的成就加以否定以掠夺我的智慧产权收入。）
3: Chinese dislike I say I am wealthy. （3： 华人不喜欢我说我很有钱)
My saying: My Trust-inheriting is a real true statement. I have complained to the laws about all the negative impacts on my life that are caused by this money's lawful ownership confusion. (我的信托继承是真实的事实，我已经向法律投诉所有这些针对财产的法律所有权的困扰对我生活所造成的负面影响。）
----Sept 15th, 2018
09-14-2018 The Cousins （五福内的亲戚)
Among all my cousins from my grandfather, cousin Zhang is the eldest grandchild of my grandfather from my father's eldest younger sister. He has been who we have been looking up to since we were in elementary school and he is the most handsome one. He has been blessed with everything that is good from his both parents, which makes me so envious because I am the joined-dissatisfactions of my both parents. We grew up in different cities and I was a what-happened beauty to him when I started college in Shanghai, but we stayed aloof during my entire college years in Shanghai. 在我爷爷所有的孙子女中，我父亲的大妹妹所育的张家表兄是我爷爷最大的孙子。从小学起，他就是我们这些一等亲的小家伙们都应该学习的榜样，他也是我们当中长得最英俊的一个。他实在是太幸运了，他是他父母双亲所有优点的完美结合；我实在是太嫉妒了，我是我父母双亲所有自认缺点的综合体。我们从小就在不不同的城市长大，我到上海上大学的时候，我是他“哪有可能”的难以置信美女。整个大学五年期间，虽然都在上海，但我们之间完全没有任何联络。
Now, his blessed all-goodness has been such a wonderful joint with a real-beauty wife and a lovely child, while I am still struggling with the worldwide public doubts of "do you ever have a loving romance at all?" So, I will follow his advise of "don't say a lot", and I will "leave him alone" to his wonderful marriage. 这么多年之后，他的一切美好又添了一个很美好的“共同体”---- 一个确实很美丽的妻子和一个可爱的孩子， 而我，却是在面对着全世界对我"是否曾有任何男人爱过“的公众舆论质疑。所以，我会听从他”不要多言“的建议，我也会“别烦他”，让他可以安静的在他自己的美丽婚姻中流连。
Inside five cousins that traditionally called relatives, I am the only girl among my first cousins*, the only girl among my same family name second cousins, and possibly also the only girl among my same family name third cousins because I heard this morning's girl-cousins are my same family-name fourth cousins. 在传统的五等亲里面，我是一等亲里唯一的女孩，二等堂亲里唯一的女孩，从今天早上所播出的那几个女孩是四等堂亲这点来推测，我估计我也是三等堂亲里唯一的女孩，
They are obviously angry at our shared grandfathers because they don't feel being the spoiled girls as their loving parents have let them feel. Well, the youngest generation grandfather we share was the first-generation big donor of the Chinese college education in Republic of China time and died as a citizen of the Republic of China around the year of 1910, which was before their fathers were born if their fathers are much younger than 100 years old. So, I can imagine our shared grandfathers would just say this to them: "Hey, why are you so jealous? My child has been spoiling you ever since you were born, why you say he is not the representative of my love?" 今天早上这几个女孩很明显是极其的愤怒，对我们共同的爷爷们没像他们自己父母那样宠爱她们很是气愤。可是，我们最年轻的一代共同的爷爷，就是中国大学教育的第一代大捐款人的那个爷爷，是在1910年左右就去世了，如果这几个女孩的父亲还没到100岁的年纪，那1910年可是这几个女孩的父亲还没出生的年份。所以，我想象我们共同的爷爷们会对这几个女孩说：“嗨，你干嘛这么嫉妒啊？我们的孩子可是从你一出生就那么宠你爱你，你为什么说他不是在代我们表达对你的爱？”
But, how come I can be so lucky to be spoiled directly from my grandfathers? That is not only because I am their girl-grandchild but also because I am the rare species of a girl who carries their birthmark. I am the nicknamed their ”palms(birthmark) girl" who they had been expecting since the realization of "It has been all boys for so long already" which was about 2500 years long at the year when I was born. All these Trust-gifts to me are the recognition of "welcome a girl join this all-boys team". That is all. 可是，那我为什么这么幸运可以被我的爷爷们直接宠着？这不只是因为我是他们的孙女，更因为我是很罕见的一个长着他们共同的胎记的孙女。自从我爷爷们意识到“怎么这么多年来有胎记的都是男孩”之后，我爷爷们就是用“掌纹（胎记）孙女”来称谓我这个他们一直都在期待着的孙女，在我出生的那年，”这么多年来“指的是2500年来。所有我收到的这些信托礼物，都是在表达认可”欢迎加入这个全部男孩的团队“。就这些了。
*I had a girl first cousin died at several years old age.我曾有过一个一等亲的表妹，她在几岁时夭折了。
----Sept 14th, 2018
09-13-2018 什么是世态炎凉？
现在据说在华人社区传开了我当年托付对我父母的照顾时，除了安排他们有和我一样的医疗保险照顾之外，还给他们安排了一份零花钱。我母亲的零花钱应该是她所居住地区的初级中级会计师的退休工资，我父亲是所居住地区的国家科学院高级退休科学家的退休工资。我当时做这样的安排就是因为我母亲从八十年代失去工资退休金后最大的抱怨就是没有了她自己的一份独立收入，想买点什么都得和我父亲要钱，所以我做女儿的收到我父系爷爷的礼物后的就从那里面给了我爷爷们的好媳妇这么一份退休工资。我母亲结婚以后真是除了照顾我父亲，就是干家务养大我和我弟弟，完全就没有她自己，有好吃的就是我们爷仨的，有好穿的也是我们爷仨优先，她要是用自家的缝纫机给她自己做了一件衣服也是在我身上穿着。所以，我给她一份从照顾我的生活这个工作上退休的退休金，由我爷爷给我的礼物里出钱就是天经地义。我母亲要是还在，就已经收到了我的四个爷爷出钱由我给付的的退休金了。我父亲估计是绝对不会给我妈退休金啦，铁了心要让我妈照顾他一辈子啦。我也给了我父亲同样的一份退休金礼物，今后我花钱还是存钱，他就不用絮絮叨叨了，他退休了。这退休金的起始日期，我母亲是2004年7月1日起，我父亲是在他离开中国后（因为他在国内已有退休金了，不需要重叠）。这退休金礼物是一笔付清，支付给代办机构后每月独立给付，不是每月由我的会计师转账。
据说有些漫天遍地要找我父母信息的就是因为要么想要通过广播剧宣布的方式想让他们这些人自己领取我给我父母的这一份退休金，要么就是想找到他们必须让他们继续承担“抚养义务”。我希望我的父母还活的好好的，过的好好的，可以看的这个博文，保护好他们自己。
我的愤怒是，不管一些人相不相信这些从2004年就有的传言，都是我父亲以他自己中国科学院的高工资高退休金及福利待遇在满足我母亲作为他的妻子和他自己亲生孩子的母亲对生活的美好向往。我母亲虽然在八十年代失去了工作和退休金，但她从来不是在讨口饭吃。为何现在的国内外华人的舆论宣传就是我母亲我父亲不应该有一份他们自给自足的美好生活？为什么中国政府所做的舆论宣传就是我不应该也不会准许我自己照顾抚养我长大的我自己的亲生父母，而是应该把我的合法钱财归为公共厕所功能所有以作为厕所马桶的粪坑屎臭奖金？中国政府及海外华裔社区如此宣传的目的除了敲诈勒索，讹诈钱财，还有什么？我父母在“去世”之前都是中国公民，理应受中国国家法律保护，却是只有中国政府出面组织的一片谩骂质问“凭什么有钱？”
亲兄弟明算账，究竟是谁认为我合法钱财在法律的财产拥有权上有争议？为何就是不通过法律寻求答案？我本人就是在完全没有任何财产信息的请况下，完全是按照法律继承了我早已去世的爷爷们所信托给我的财产，按照同样的法律，我就没有任何可能继承到任何其他人的一分钱财。
如果任何人对我的法律信托继承有任何质疑，都是应该咨询法律，而不是漫街吆喝只要你们这些人自己没拿到钱，就是这世上根本就没有法律，甚至不准我拥有我自己的合法财产使用我自己的合法钱财，不准我作为美国公民享受由美国宪法所保障的言论自由说我自己有钱。你对我叫嚣吆喝，我就是向法律举报你敲诈勒索，讹诈钱财。我确实是就此已经全部向美国的警方投诉了。
09-11-2018 Who has been paying for my expenses?
04-18-2018 都是有关我的方家亲戚以及方家后人的
06-16-2018 就我的信托继承，我给方家后人和方家亲戚的一份说明
----2018年9月13日。
09-12-2018 89年学运这一群人和我之间的矛盾究竟是什么？
听说了今天早上的女军官故事。她是89年学运成员来了美国，嫁了一个美国人丈夫又有一些很名人的美国军方同事。
我和89年学运这群人的根本矛盾从来就不是什么政治上的对立，因为对当年学运的认知就是他们是一群爱国的学生，所以我和89年学运这群人的根本矛盾其实在于：
- 因为当年的轰轰烈烈，他们是打心眼里瞧不起我一点声音都没有的风格；
- 我是从1989年起就认为他们很幼稚园，所以很成年人的我从来就没看见过他们。
就这些啦。
----2018年9月12日。·
09-11-2018 Who has been paying for my expenses?
From all the angry voices, it is obvious that the anger is from the confusion regarding the money ownership, it is definitely not any romance confusion.
*Reason: All of them are not from the three big U.S. rich names. The anger is about my very expensive invisible high-tech security and very expensive remote medical expenses. Plus, my daily living expenses such as housing and food, have been covered by the U.S. government's welfare system's Section 8 housing project and Food Stamps (SNAP), obviously never any rich man's any money (updated on 09-12-2018)*.
Very simple way to ease the anger: Money's ownership by LAW.
So,
Please do not request to stop any payment of my expenses, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;
Please do not take away any money payment of my expenses, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;
Please do not harass or interrupt any paid-already service providers of mine, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;
Please do not take away any money payment of my expenses, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;
Please do not harass or interrupt any paid-already service providers of mine, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;
Please do not harass anyone for any money payment of my expenses, and
Please consult the paying company or your own attorneys regarding your confusion.
Please consult the paying company or your own attorneys regarding your confusion.
If there is anyone confused because of romance, please contact your own male or your attorney for your confusion. I will sue you or you both for sexual harassment if you insist on harassing me.
All my father-side grandparents died before I was born, and my parents were both well in 2004. So, it was not a family-inheriting but Trust-inheriting in 2004. 我父系的爷爷奶奶都是在我出生前就已经去世了，我父母2004年也活得很好， 所以我在2004年的继承不是分家产继承（家里刚刚死了人的继承，family inheriting）， 而是信托继承。
I only inherited Trusts that I was specified as the sole beneficiary person by the deceased Settler's letter. 我所继承的信托都是由已去世的信托设定人的信托委托书制定我是唯一受益人。
So, if there is any confusion regarding Trust-inheriting from my father-side associated, please consult your attorney. I will report extortion to the law enforcement if you insist on harassing me for "your share of the money" that I did not take and never have. 所以，亲兄弟明算账，如果我父系一方的相关人士，有任何关于我2004信托继承的疑问，请向你们自己的律师咨询，如果你坚持向我索要我从未拥有也从未拿过的所谓“你的那份钱”，我会向警方举报你敲诈勒索。
----Sept 11th, 2018
09-10-2018 Rumored broadcasting of "Never heard of this Min Fang" from the JPM Chase management
I heard there are a lot of people want to confront my saying about JPM Chase on the public channels.
I have no problem to be confronted, but I do request the challenger to declare the knowledge possessed for the privilege to challenge on a public channel as such a privileged knowledgeable voice. It takes much more than "freedom of speech" to be on a public channel is the reason I request so. (09/11/2018)
I stand by the truthfulness and authentication of my account on the changing process that I published on my web blog.
09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
Some Clarifications:
1: The table "Force analysis table" illustrated my contributions.
The table is my MBA 503 Leading Organizational Change's homework "Force analysis table" in July of 2018, not any table of the technology projections from before mid of 2005-time from JPM Chase's management,
The table of this "Force analysis" illustrates my contributions of "What needs to change" was done before July of 2005, because the massive "how to change" already started at the online application level to serve the JPM Chase clients around July of 2005.
2: JPM Chase management.
JPM Chase (New York Headquartered) was having a merger with Bank One (Chicago Headquartered) since July of 2004. The CEO retired in Dec. of 2005. Mr. Chief Technology Officer retired in Dec. of 2006, but there was no successor after his retirement, each business line's CTO reports to the Chief Administrative officer.
Its Treasure Lowell technology center I worked at was rumored to be shut down and had a massive layoff since 2006.
I was a contractor and new to JPM Chase, and I only stayed there till January of 2007, so I did not pay attention to any other human resource changes. The change process in JPM Chase, by end of 2006, was already at the GUI (Graphic User interface) level to ensure looks-and-feels of the software( applications) also exactly as Business-requested.
3: How would I know if I was ever heard of?
The change conducted in JPM Chase was never a non-sense. I am proud of my lifetime achievement to promote Computer technology conversion from innovative invention only to crafted-arts creative technology. Nobody ever has done this before me for me to copy from.
Without my promotion of the QA importance, not a change that computer technology can change from "Never heard of the super cool thing invented to explore the unknown area", to "practical customer-order to serve the daily business-conducting usage". The difference in-between is as big as the "water-painting portrait" so pretty to have but not really useful, to a "crafted artistic design of home electronic appliances".
WIthout the deep understanding of how quality assurance safeguards pharmaceutical products in every step of its manufacturing, it was impossible a computer programmer could understand that upgrading the academic-expectation for Quality Assurance personnel was so critical in conducting this sweeping change in JPM Chase.
Not only I was a complete-project independent research programmer who did research on the client/server module (for authentication), the data transmission module and the database module independently for a never-done-before computer security project, but I was also a Quality Assurance personnel with the Inspector working experience from the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA equivalent in China. This was one of knowledge that I had contributed to JPM Chase management team.
Also, on July 1st of 2004, there was a brief conversation when I said I want to work in the financial industry to learn some economic & business, I was welcomed to take a look at its computer technology system since I was a top-notch computer security specialist, but I was not certain if I was welcome to JPM Chase. I was contracted to JPM Chase through a consulting firm from Florida.
----Sept 10, 2018
09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
 |
| Force Analysis Table for Kotter's Change Model's Force Fields Analysis |
09-09-2018 The Story of a Property in Shanghai
It is indeed very funny to hear the yell: "this is already a lawsuit if the husband insists on demanding that money back."
The story is started with a rumor: There is a property owned by me, which is actually owned by the American "Pejoves" Fund company in Shanghai, so, a lot of Shanghai's females who had some sexual intercourse experiences with He, Guoqiang （贺国强）deserved to take it over and actually occupied it to make the company-owned property such a Vagina-closet to serve those who are all obviously not active in-use but for private storage purpose.
My reaction: High pitched voice screaming "Why they occupy my property? Why my house is a Vagina storage? I need to burn this property".
The property's story: So, there went a Hispanic actress lady set the fire on a Shanghai property, I was very happy but she was not. She got a lawsuit in Shanghai because someone tried to pay her to buy that property she never owned, and this morning as you heard, her husband was demanded to pay for the damage to that property.
The confusion:
- The damage to the property has been the expense already on the American "Pejoves" fund company who never asked her newly-wed husband to pay.
- The demander is from a French family who are confused about the ownership of the property, also a very good friend to the husband and knows his dating history.
- I never had any association with the husband, never even met.
----Sept 9th, 2018
A note:
A lot of people, who include myself, have been concerned about what will be the relationship between me and my biological children if I can't be with them?
Well, I have asked laws help on possible intentional hate-education from those who want or have wanted their father, and I am possibly in the situation of being intentionally abducted a-like by those people as well, but if with all the help I have called, they have still being educated to hate me, I have to say I am a polygamist-male through and through and I am not willing to let myself be around by anyone who hates me. So, I decided it very simply as a biological mother: They are either my children who return my love caring as my own children, or they are never my anyone.
Min Fang
09-09-2018
09-08-2018 The M family and the Lehman Brother's French Investor
Heard about the M family has been associated with Lehman Brother's French Investor.
My response:
Ya, but I am just a typical beneficiary person of some Trusts who knows nothing. I claimed the Fund company is because I heard my 2018's expenses have been provided for by this American Fund company according to its French investor's instruction which was an after its company-tax payment, and possibly after its French investor's company-tax payment as well, so I say a Trust I inherited has been its upstream investor, but I don't know anything other than this.
----Sept 8th, 2018
09-07-2018 The Sweeping Chane of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
I was surprised when I heard the saying has been that nobody knows what I did in JPMChase. I never explained myself to anyone because I thought everyone already knows. The change already happened successfully and my role in this successful change was never denied by anyone from Lowell technology center of JPM Chase, and it is unimaginable that any organizational change can be made so successfully without the entire management knew what needed to change and how to change cascadingly, and change has been replicated throughout the entire U.S. banking industry. Of course, can you imagine any technology executives in the banking industry to have a good night sleep when I was screaming with anxiety "the internet banking-access is a green passage."
The day I stepped into JPM Chase Lowell technology center was July 1st of 2004, the massive firm-wide technology upgrading started only a year later in Mid of 2005, it had been every weekend that there was some major upgrade went online and at the backend offices, how could all these be achieved without the massive managerial efforts?
Following is updated from my school blackboard post of the MBA503 Leading organizational change:
Exactly, what had I contributed to this change as a computer QA contractor in JPM Chase?
I alerted the management my concern about banking technology and illustrated my vision of the banking industry in the digital era.
To lead the change, I addressed all these status quo-es I listed in the table to specify what content needed to be included in the standard business requirement for technology people to understand the business objectives for technology projects, and promoted the tech-spec standard should be a shared standard between QA and development as the one and only tech-standard, etc. I had been guided by the management to input my knowledge into JPM Chase's existing best practices, through a series of conflicts between QAs, business interpreters, and developers' group in projects which made me known for confrontational and stubborn.
How was I technically capable to lead this change?
The Window login replacement project made me a top-notch security personnel in the computer technology system as well as a full-project independent research programmer. I independently achieved prototypes of window login replacement Gina(client)/LSA(server) module, secure data transmission module, LDAP database module as well as helping functions such as admin tool and installer, etc. We only had a total of seven computer-major personnel in that company which included a research director, three programmers in this project, another three full-time in consulting (one had been in San Francisco who only visited the office during yearly holiday seasons).
Also, it is from my work experience in the pharmaceutical industry, I had learned the QA's great importance in every step of the production which even includes the facilities' designing to hosting the manufacturing.
Also, it is from my work experience in the pharmaceutical industry, I had learned the QA's great importance in every step of the production which even includes the facilities' designing to hosting the manufacturing.
My personal experience from the change: "QAs and programmers with years' practicing experiences in the technology department were all supportive of changes. They were the group understood what I was changing before the changes in the requirements were clear. It was a sweeping change everywhere in JPM Chase with their enormous support, great changing experience."
How did the change happen in JPM Chase?
The planned change proposed in mid of 2004 was to change the existing situation of " Business units take-in whatever technology support unit can give", to upgrade the technology to make the software or applications to be designed & developed exactly as requested by the business units.
This change plan was overwhelmingly supported by all JPM Chase's business units who had been so fed up with "technology person tells us what we should do about our business through computers". I remembered how technology units across all JPM Chase business lines got affluent funding to upgrade the human resources as well as the computers and related, and how it had been like when there was at least one application successfully upgraded to best serve the business needs each weekend since 2006 (should be mid of 2005).
The resisting forces were the status quo that technology developing group so got used to telling the business as well as the technical quality assurance group "we already gave the best we can do, what else do you want from us?" or technology groups were complaining "we are the computer person, not a financier, what exactly the business is requesting?", etc. Also, the realistic limits that certain business great requests just can't be achieved by existing known technology as I listed in the above table.
The shift of the equilibrium started after the Business Request was standardized by the Business-technology interpreters, which was followed by the standardizing of the technical specification shared between software(application) developing group and software(application) quality assurance group. With this two major upgrades, the human resource upgrading to enhance the quality assurance team achieved equilibrium change of "What Business requested can be achieved and should be developed exactly as requested." It had been my great experience to be the technological-leader to promote and to watch all these amazing changes.
Another Note:
I was labeled "never a research type person". It is true that I am not the person enjoy endless devoted hours in a laboratory or in office for the passion of discovery, I am the person just do my job finishing assignment. When I started my research job, my research director was about to retire, I was a commuter planned to get my green card at suburb and to find a better-paid job in New York City, all of our research team was punctual-minute in at 8:30AM or equivalent and right-out at 5 PM sharp. If any guys stayed-in, that was only because they have nothing else to do that day. This was our group and our project-ing style was "tell me what you want, I take a look and do it".
I was labeled "never a research type person". It is true that I am not the person enjoy endless devoted hours in a laboratory or in office for the passion of discovery, I am the person just do my job finishing assignment. When I started my research job, my research director was about to retire, I was a commuter planned to get my green card at suburb and to find a better-paid job in New York City, all of our research team was punctual-minute in at 8:30AM or equivalent and right-out at 5 PM sharp. If any guys stayed-in, that was only because they have nothing else to do that day. This was our group and our project-ing style was "tell me what you want, I take a look and do it".
The boss wanted us to have a project to elevate our computer & security software consulting company, so the IBM well-experienced research director gave us this "impossible project" to expect 3 full-time programmers and 2 full-time helping consulting person to replace Microsoft Window password login, this was a project achievable to his understanding and really suited our boss' ambition. I was the person asking "what do you want from me? I can devote my 8-hours on it here", the guys were all saying "we want the best, super cool technology, I do what I can but I don't have a lot of time for it". So, we achieved this window logon project in 3 years time with 40-hours per week work-on-assignment style.
This was the technology-change I led in JPM Chase's technology upgrading. It was not about how innovative the computer technology can be, it was about how creative the computer technology can be when doing a project on-assignment: "tell us what your business unit need from us technology unit, we will achieve it in our 40-hours per week working time here as in-house project".
----Sept 7th, 2018
09-06-2018 Being the Missy from generationally famous playboys' family in Shanghai（老上海赫赫有名的花花公子世家的当家大小姐）
I heard there has been saying, since the revelation of my grandfather's famous playful side, that I am paying my grandfathers' debt for him being the famous playboy in the 1930s-1948 Shanghai before he set up the Trust for me, my great-grandfather in 1910s-1930s Shanghai, my great-great-grandfather in Shanghai, etc. My father left Shanghai when he was 18 to join the Army and re-allocated to Nanjing where I was born.（我听说自从我爷爷是个有名的花花公子的真相披露以后，就听说1有这种“感觉这次是在让孙女还爷爷欠的风流债”的说法。我爷爷是从1930起直到1948年他替我设了信托之间一直都在玩花花，我曾祖父是1910-1930上海有名的花花公子，还有我曽曾祖父也是在上海玩花花。我父亲是1949年18岁离开上海当兵，然后被分配在南京也就是我出生的地方工作。）
Well, if assume each generation at age 50 to have the heir-son born, I should have over 50 rich-experienced playboy grandfathers-angels looking after me in heaven, considering my family has been over 2500 years rich polygamist family even though I don't know how may exceptionals like my father who knows nothing about playing.（我还算幸运啦，想想我们家可是有着2500年历史的一夫多妻的富裕家庭，如果算50岁才生下下一代继承人，我就有至少超过50代的玩花花经验及其丰富的爷爷们在天上当神仙看护着我。不过我不知道我爷爷里有多少代是像我父亲一样对玩花花一窍不通的。）
Why I say this? I am interested in who is demanding the price from me? This demanding is obviously from Shanghai, not the Zhejiang province where my family had resided before moved Shanghai.（我为什么这么说，我很想知道是谁在向我开这个价码？这个开价的努力很明显是和上海有关，而不是我家搬去上海之前的浙江省。）
09-05-2018 亲兄弟明算账，是否法律权益是否合法拥有应该是寻求法律所给予的答案及解释
听说了有些人对继承究竟是怎么回事，还是很愤怒很弄不明白。我本人的亲身体会，原因在于司法部门的法务工作人员可能高估了我们这些不是学法律的人对于他们就法律事务的专业解释的理解能力。
从2015年起，我是整天怒气冲天到处找我的钱在哪，海外华裔社区就到处传言说我根本是想要讹诈美国政府机关，要不是我当年确实有继承经历，还真有可能造成美国政府机关对我采取行动。其中关键就在于我不是学法律的，我的继承故事从未更改，就是关键线索统统没有。法律界不知情的人士听不懂我的故事，被我烦到不行，我听来听去法律界人士的回复都是敌意重重。·好在两者之间的法律调查人员只听线索是什么，那我可是提供了一堆也从没变过，而他们的专长就是他们自己找关键线索及法律依据，所以我熬过来了。
比如说吧，我就一直说我是在帮我申请绿卡的律师那里开的电话会议，司法界的人士一听就已经把耳朵给关了。我给换成：我是由这个律师通知，在这几天去了这家律师楼，地址电话是什么，并在这个律师的全程陪同下参与了这几个继承相关会议。。。，法律界的人士就开始问。。。
再比如，我一直说我是在6月30日继承了信托，7月1日又办理了信托，法律界人士就问信托的名称及登记记录是什么，还态度明确就是没这个信息就什么查询都不现实也不可能，我一听这根本就是在问我的银行存款账户信息，我就赶紧解释我很相信我的信托律师，我就只想知道生活费用给付在哪，法律界人士的耳朵就又给关上了。因为我既然说我有办理了信托，他们其实是在问这一份新的信托，也就是我继承以后自己办理的这一份信托的登记记录是什么，虽然我也还是相信我的信托律师，但我已经知道如何恰当表达我只是查询生活费用给付情形的目的而不是想要假借查询实施讹诈。
我听说上海有些人去了法院要告我，法院就给个单子就不再予以理睬，说是给气到不行。我就一直在美国说整个事件就感觉中国好像根本就没有法律。现在回头看，我本人认为可能是他们看不懂那个单子是什么意思。法院从来不是什么“有理没钱莫进门”，但也不是只要乐意就可以告东告西的，举个例子，就像一个东北的单纯务农人员，在没有从上海购买任何家电产品的情况下，就没有任何法律依据可以上法院控告上海某家用电器商店的商业运作是否规范，这个东北的单纯务农人员是可以因为自己是中国公民而走进中国的法院，但中国法院不会受理而是会给一个单子说明拒绝承办其投诉的理由，这其实是根据中国的法律予以拒绝的。
就我的继承而言，是依据中国法律，英国法律及美国法律，上海的方家亲戚没有可能上法庭告我。这就是因为根据法律，按照我爷爷方智仁的遗嘱，他们不是我所继承的香港这个信托的受益人，所以在既不是由他们的钱设立的信托，他们也不是信托设立人方智仁所指定的信托受益人的情况下，他们就没有任何法律资格上中国法庭英国法庭美国法庭就我的信托继承而控告我。我爷爷方智仁的信托委托书是给我的私人信件，我有法律权力不予公开，但这并不会妨碍中国司法部门就上海的方家亲戚是否也是该信托受益人的法律调查，我在此博客也已经提供了充足的调查线索。我听说方家亲戚也已经听到中国司法机关调查后的解释，可能就是听不懂，所以很愤怒。
至于这个香港的信托其实是于家的什么人的说法是谬传。我听说的是上海有个于家也在香港办理过信托，但设立人，设立金额，目前的信托规模，及信托受益人等等，都和我爷爷方智仁替我所设立的信托完全不同，根本不是一个信托，2004年的五亿美金是由我所继承的由方智仁1948年所设立的那个信托给付，这个2004年五亿美金也远远超越了传言中的于家在香港所设立的信托在2004年及目前（2018年）的全部资金规模。
以上这些是有关方家亲眷是否也是信托受益人的。还有一些华裔社区的疑问就是究竟这家那家公司是谁拥有？这也是应该寻求法律答案和解释的，但这和方家亲眷一点关系都没有。方家亲眷和我继承之间需要法律解释的是究竟他们自己是否是受益人，属于信托法和继承法所涵盖内容。
至于这家那家美国公司在法律上究竟是归谁拥有，也就是说这家那家美国公司是否是我的另一个信托作为法人机构在美国所投资的企业公司，这是由英国法国美国的公司法投资法所涵盖的内容，全部应该是由这些公司的法务部们和该信托法人机构的法务部门所处理，这和谁应该是该信托的受益人完全无关。这是为什么我在弄清我所继承的是该信托而不是该信托在美国所投资的这家那家公司后我就对这家那家公司的法律所有权困扰完全不再发声的原因，这一切都是该信托作为法人机构的公司投资业务经营，我是该信托的唯一受益人。
在方家亲眷根本就不是该信托的受益人也不是该信托的设立人的情况下，方家亲眷（包括中国政府）都和这些美国公司的法律所有权完全没有任何关系。
----2018年9月5日。
09-04-2018 What to respect when the public channel's continuing promotion is "A sarbage woman is not good to be a proud public toilet"?
Happy celebration of the clarification that I never took over anyone's wealth by flirting remotely.
I heard my claim of the following four American Fund companies have survived weekends. Other than the four well-known confused families you have heard of, other than their lawfully registered owner-investor company, no one else can claim their ownership but I am privileged to claim the four Trusts I inherited in the year of 2004 have been these companies upstream-investors.
This has been my frustration facing the anger of "you can't own anyone's wealth by saying so" and the panic of "Whose money you spend? Where did you get the money?" Exactly right, how could any well-managed wealth possibly have no-known lawful owner? How could I possibly spend whoever's money without contacting anybody to get the money physically into my hands or my wallet?
It has been so ridiculous to say that I could spend whoever's $4-6 Billion U.S. dollars on July 1st of 2004 by just saying "I want so" in a small law firm in Stamford of Connecticut. The truthful facts actually have been:
- I can only lawfully spend my own lawful money by just saying "I want to". I spent only my own lawful money on July 1st of 2004.
- I can only effectively spend money only when I say "I want to" to my own entrusting groups. I spent only my own lawful money on July 1st of 2004.
To avoid confusion if what I have claimed is inherited money or flirting-taking-over-fees, this is to clarify all four American Fund companies, each has $200Billion-size in 2004, which I have claimed on my web blog that,
- Each of these four $200Billion-size(2004) American Fund companies have never carried Rockefeller families Holding, nor Ford families Holding, nor Walton families holding as its official name nor its nickname
- Each of these four $200Billion-size(2004) American Fund companies have never been considered officially or customarily as part of the Rockefeller Families Holding, nor Fold Families Holding, nor Walton Families Holding.
----Sept 4th, 2018
Whom else should be respected when the public channel's continuing education is "A sarbage (garbage) woman is not good to be a proud public toilet"?
I don't know what the confusions are but I am not bad shaped for this morning's broadcasting of the continuing education which is themed of "the garbage woman has no value as public bathroom toilet seat", what I have learned of so far is that some people seem just don't know what else can possibly be the reason to look up to whom else when these people are not in-use body-positioned. What else these Amercan real riches and the almighty Chinese government are trying to educate the united nation on a public channel?
I myself have been brought up totally different value so I don't promote this "woman is a toilet" even I myself is an American rich as well who is also a traditional polygamist but a female having a male's privilege expected in my marriage. I don't know if this "proud to be the toilet valuable" educational theme is my wrongful impression but I expect myself won't be so shabby in the town of traditional college education of traditional concept of culture.
My current headache is not the ambition to occupy a high-level executive position, but how to fund my next English literature education if I am ready for it before I receive my allowance.
----Sept 4th, 2018
08-31-2018 Anger of "You can't state you own this money if you don't own the paying company."(updated)
I have been claiming my Trust owns the company as an upstream investor, this either has been acknowledged by the company's lawfully ownership-registered owner or nor contradicted by the company.
To avoid confusion if what I have claimed is inherited money or flirting-taking-over-fees, this is to clarify all four American Fund companies, each has $200Billion-size in 2004, which I have claimed on my web blog that,
To avoid confusion if what I have claimed is inherited money or flirting-taking-over-fees, this is to clarify all four American Fund companies, each has $200Billion-size in 2004, which I have claimed on my web blog that,
- Each of these four $200Billion-size(2004) American Fund companies have never carried Rockefeller families Holding, nor Ford families Holding, nor Walton families holding as its official name nor its nickname
- Each of these four $200Billion-size(2004) American Fund companies have never been considered officially or customarily as part of the Rockefeller Families Holding, nor Fold Families Holding, nor Walton Families Holding.
----updated on Sept 2nd, 2018
If you can't validate if I inherited any Trust or if it has been the lawful upstream investor of this company, well, I have to say it is never your privilege to insist on me to prove myself to you or probe into the matter.
I am comfortable that you can't validate my claim, please respect my claim as long as the company I claimed does not contradict my saying as well as not owned by you.
If you are concerned about what you would do as a complete outsider of the matter, I would say as long as you keep in mind you have not been able to validate the claim yet.
If you are concerned about what you would do as a complete outsider of the matter, I would say as long as you keep in mind you have not been able to validate the claim yet.
If you are concerned about what you need to react if you are associated with the company that I claimed, I would say you should be able to validate my claim if necessary.
If you are concerned about what should be the expectation if I inquiry you for possible financial arrangement has made for me by the company I claimed, I say I am the person respect your honest reply.
I have stated I changed the strategy of my inquiry to ask if there has been any pre-paid arrangement that is lawfully for my exclusive usage, and this change was because of the above argument. The reasons for this change are the following:
- I am a private person who is not forbidden by law to accept any payment from any company,
- The paying company is a privately owned company and paying is for my exclusive usage with proper lawful instructions,
- Then, as long as the company is not avoiding the company-tax and I am properly taxed, the payment arrangement from the company should be understood as lawfully for my exclusive usage.
My experience of inheriting some Trusts from my own Chinese birth grandfathers' has been real but I am not the person knows a lot as well, so, I am comfortable to wait for the help currently.
----August 31st, 2018
Inheriting references and explanations:
1: I never stated I heard I inherited money. I have been stating I experienced inheriting by going to a law firm to participate teleconferences with identifications and an attorney's accompanying.
Note: My original statement has been that I participated in the teleconferences at my green card application attorney's office on these three days (which can be verified by the U.S. satellite records).
2: On July 1st of 2004, I entrusted what I have inherited on June 30th of 2004. Ever since this day, I have been kept saying it is my own money I am spending.
Note: Well, if you inherited a saving account from your great-grandfather, which was finalized after you received the will-executing attorney's formal informing letter or signed some legal documentation, you would call it your own money instead of "your deceased great-grandfather's money you are expecting", right? My Trust-inheriting was finalized when I was asked on June 30th of 2004 if I was willing to pay willingness-based inheriting related voluntary taxes. After my Trust-inheriting finalized, the lawful owner of the money is lawfully transferred to me. Of course, I lawfully own the money is the reason for me to lawfully claim "my own money".
3: My inheriting day big $4Billion - $6Billion shopping spray of "what I want" was on July 1st of 2004.
Note: It is very common for any newly inherited to spend a big chunk of money who normally leave the inheriting will-executing law firm with a check that can be cashed immediately.
There has been a huge problem regarding whose money I was spending on July 1st of 2004, from some confused American rich. And I have been angry that these American rich took advantage of my shopping spray's investment opportunities to make money but shit me all over.
If I knew my claim of "my own money" on July 1st of 2004 was misunderstood as taking over their family wealth, I would explain my own money is from my deceased Chinese birth-grandfathers' blessing as every newly inherited would enjoy doing. It was only the next day and if I knew "I am not paying for it" was from real frustration instead of joking for the facts they were(are) still enjoying the limited allowances while watching me having their family seniors' size of spending budget.
I heard this only last year (2017) that youngsters who don't know their family seniors' wealth details confused so severely. None of my claimed companies have ever been owned by any major rich houses which can be validated easily because the size of the companies I claimed was $200Billion each in 2004, all have been on America's soil over 400 years, and could afford to donate "$200Million each" to Olympic related events between 2004-2008.
4: Somebody was sitting there the entire time on June 30th or July 1st of 2004 but did not hear me inheriting.
Note: It was teleconference and inheriting event has always been exclusive which means no irrelated person should be in my inheriting teleconference which was easily achievable by:
Inheriting references and explanations:
1: I never stated I heard I inherited money. I have been stating I experienced inheriting by going to a law firm to participate teleconferences with identifications and an attorney's accompanying.
Note: My original statement has been that I participated in the teleconferences at my green card application attorney's office on these three days (which can be verified by the U.S. satellite records).
2: On July 1st of 2004, I entrusted what I have inherited on June 30th of 2004. Ever since this day, I have been kept saying it is my own money I am spending.
Note: Well, if you inherited a saving account from your great-grandfather, which was finalized after you received the will-executing attorney's formal informing letter or signed some legal documentation, you would call it your own money instead of "your deceased great-grandfather's money you are expecting", right? My Trust-inheriting was finalized when I was asked on June 30th of 2004 if I was willing to pay willingness-based inheriting related voluntary taxes. After my Trust-inheriting finalized, the lawful owner of the money is lawfully transferred to me. Of course, I lawfully own the money is the reason for me to lawfully claim "my own money".
3: My inheriting day big $4Billion - $6Billion shopping spray of "what I want" was on July 1st of 2004.
Note: It is very common for any newly inherited to spend a big chunk of money who normally leave the inheriting will-executing law firm with a check that can be cashed immediately.
There has been a huge problem regarding whose money I was spending on July 1st of 2004, from some confused American rich. And I have been angry that these American rich took advantage of my shopping spray's investment opportunities to make money but shit me all over.
If I knew my claim of "my own money" on July 1st of 2004 was misunderstood as taking over their family wealth, I would explain my own money is from my deceased Chinese birth-grandfathers' blessing as every newly inherited would enjoy doing. It was only the next day and if I knew "I am not paying for it" was from real frustration instead of joking for the facts they were(are) still enjoying the limited allowances while watching me having their family seniors' size of spending budget.
I heard this only last year (2017) that youngsters who don't know their family seniors' wealth details confused so severely. None of my claimed companies have ever been owned by any major rich houses which can be validated easily because the size of the companies I claimed was $200Billion each in 2004, all have been on America's soil over 400 years, and could afford to donate "$200Million each" to Olympic related events between 2004-2008.
4: Somebody was sitting there the entire time on June 30th or July 1st of 2004 but did not hear me inheriting.
Note: It was teleconference and inheriting event has always been exclusive which means no irrelated person should be in my inheriting teleconference which was easily achievable by:
- Telephone's multiple channels technology for the privacy purpose. (Telephones has Line 1, Line 2.. features for different groups of people).
- Internet meeting software, such as Skype, has different chatrooms available for different groups of patrons as well, for the same privacy purpose.
----August 31st, 2018
08-30-2018 I refuse to adopt any child who does not carry my blood biologically.
I refuse to adopt any child who does not carry my blood biologically. I have no problem to have nothing to do with this morning's each announced child's entire father-side relatives at all.
I heard both mothered by a Chinese or an Asian, both born in 2010 but not in June of 2010. I heard this entire "plot" is called "the smartest strategy" to take over my own handsome wealth.
It is so disgusting when the entire broadcasting of this morning, as if, is to present how the possible British Nobility or an American Rich both have nothing for each's own biological daughter to call her inheritable.
----August 30th, 2018
Reference about my own handsome wealth:
I never stated I heard I inherited money. I have been stating I experienced inheriting by going to a law firm to participate teleconferences with identifications and an attorney's accompanying. My statement has been that I participated in the teleconferences at my green card application attorney's office on these three days (which can be verified by the satellite records).
On July 1st of 2004, I entrusted what I have inherited on June 30th of 2004.
----August 28th, 2018
My inheriting day big $4Billion - $6Billion shopping spray of "what I want" was on July 1st of 2004. *I had a huge panic attack in 2017 on 96.9 FM Boston, when I heard for the first time that Rockefellers accused me spent their $4-6 Billion money on July 1st of 2004 because I never contacted anyone of them to ask their money or their permission to spend their money all my life.
----August 30th, 2018
08-28-2018 Exactly, what are the confusions related to my inheriting on June 30th of 2004?
1: The confusion of how can I expect to own any wealth by announcing so on a public channel or by bilking government? My Answer: This is totally a misunderstanding.
A lot of public anger associated with how I could possibly fancy I could own O'Connors family-wealth by announcing so on the radio? This is totally a misunderstanding. Let me illustrate it a bit.
There is a property or a company which has been lawfully owned, and there is a manager who has been looking after this property or this company. O'Connors' confusion was that they have been the boss of this manager over almost two centuries, of course, it is because they own this property or this company. My confusion was "but this is the same property or the same company I was told I inherited from my birth Chinese grandfather on my inheriting day".
It turned out that the company has been owned by its British Investor company which has been on its ownership registration-license record since it was established over 400 years ago. The Trust I inherited has been its British investor company's upstream investor.
----August 28th, 2018
2: The confusion that I can't say I have inherited money by stating "I heard of".
My Answer: This is a misunderstanding.
I never stated I heard I inherited money. I have been stating I experienced inheriting by going to a law firm to participate teleconferences with identifications and an attorney's accompanying. My statement has been that I participated in the teleconferences at my green card application attorney's office on these three days (which can be verified by the satellite records). I need to reference what I possibly inherited, which are the companies I have stated provided for me since 2015, is because I was inquiring where the paid-out money could possibly be. I stated I heard what I had possibly inherited but not inheriting itself.
----August 28th, 2018
3: The confusion of who knows who was inheriting on June 30th of 2004 when it was so crowded. My answer: This is a misunderstanding.
Inheriting only relates to what a deceased person's left behind which means the wealth should be lawfully owned by the deceased before the death, lawfully owned after the inheriting, and also cared for during the in-between time by the will-executing attorneys according to the Laws. My Trust-inheriting is much easier because there is no confusion of the legitimate-ownership in-between period.
So, it doesn't matter how many unintended people were presented in a place when someone is inheriting, the deceased person's wealth should be under will-executing attorneys responsibilities to ensure lawful distribution which leads to who lawfully owns what after the inheriting. Will-executing attorneys are the group oversee the wealth-ownership-transition from the deceased to the living according to the Laws during an inheriting, it is impossible to confuse who can inherit what no matter how crowded the inheriting place might be nor how many inheriting happening at the same geographic location at the same time.
All inheriting must associate with a death, a Family-inheriting is always sad because it associates with an inheriting-day-recent death.
Trusting-inheriting is always independent of the time of the deceased settlor's death. All my grandfathers passed away before I was born, so, my inheriting was a happy event.
On July 1st of 2004, I entrusted what I have inherited on June 30th of 2004.
----August 28th, 2018
My inheriting day big $4Billion - $6Billion shopping spray of "what I want" was on July 1st of 2004. *I had a huge panic in 2017 on 96.9 FM Boston when I heard Rockefellers accused me spent their $4-6 Billion money on July 1st of 2004 because I never contacted anyone of them to ask their money or their permission to spend their money all my life.
----updated on August 30th, 2018
My anger of who is the person confused the sucking-fee with the inherited money?
My anger has been
1: When I was claiming I inherited since June 30th of 2004, it is obviously stating I have money but definitely not a living person's romance-fee, and even if there was someone else inheriting on that same day, the wealth should be under will-executing attorneys managing for lawful ownership transitioning purpose, how could anyone confuse my claim of inherited money with some living persons' family-wealth while knowing their entire family have been healthy living all this time?
2: With the will-executing attorneys overseeing the ownership-transition according to the Laws, how could possibly any lawful ownership be transferred to me if that was not my inheriting or not my inheritable? All those Trusts I have inherited have never been owned by anyone else other than myself since their establishments. What else is the confusion about the ownership of what I have inherited, other than the confusion similar to the confusion item 1?
3: I have been stating I inherited my birth Chinese grandfathers' money and all these companies I referenced have never been owned by those confused males, why all those who got joysticks-sucking-fees deserve to shit me all over? Who is the person doesn't know the difference between the inherited-money and the joystick-sucking-fee?
Why wouldn't I fight back by telling everybody that must be a public men's-toilet if the confidence is " being the most eligible one for the joyStick-sucking-fee as long as there is a joystick."
----August 28th, 2018
08-25-2010 My inheriting is never a joke
Heard about the talk of "scheduled to start at 10:30 AM EST on June 30th on 2004"?
My response:
I was called to have a meeting with my green card application attorney in his law firm located on Broad Street in Stamford, CT on June 30th of 2004 at about 9:30AM-10AM. It took me a bit time to take off because I did not remember this appointment at all. That was the meeting started off with "You are not allowed to contact a married U.S. Military officer until his retirement time." I did not remember how long it was but I did remember there was some friendly chat after this "opening note" before I was asked: "Do you wish (want) to be a rich person?" So, I was asked this question definitely after 10:30-11: 00 AM EST on June 30th, 2004.
I took this "Do you want to be a rich person?" as a social conversation, so I answered, "of course". I heard I was asked by a Federal Judge from New York State.
Sometime later, I was asked if I was willing to pay willingness-based voluntary inheriting related taxes which are a federal estate tax and state inheriting tax, I heard recently this was asked by an IRS tax officer and a Connecticut tax officer. I took this so not seriously and answered: "If I don't need to pay a tax, why would I ever pay any tax". I was asked again but I was still not getting the seriousness of taxing, so I said the capital and highlighted "NO" which I knew made the air still at the moment, I changed my mind about paying to inherit related taxes already and I expressed this to my entrusting attorneys already.
----August 25th, 2018
I heard there was a lot of confusion why a Federal Judge presented? and from New York State when I was a Connecticut State resident?
My response:
First of all, a Federal Judge was presented may be because some Trusts I inherited are from my ancient grandfathers which are so ancient that the Trusts were set up by their wills but after their deaths when a Trust became a lawful item. These Trusts are testamentary trusts which need a probation Judge for inheriting. What I have announced on this blog are all from very ancient birth grandfathers of mine.
Second, Connecticut state, New York state and New Jersey State are a common tripod-states that attorneys often hold multi-states licenses in this area, but I don't know about Federal Judges.
----August 25th, 2018
08-19-2018 The confusion about who owns what money or who can spend what money.
Heard about the confusion of "donation" and "dividend".
My response:
On July 1st of 2004, I said donation plan of "200Million" each to Olympic Game related, the confusion has been why it became the invested company's donation instead of the investor's personal donation.
Any company's donation is the expenses before the company-tax which means any company's donation is:
- the donation of hard working time from the company's staff who made the money,
- the donation of waived taxes from the government, state and federal.
- the donation of dividend share from the company's investor.
The difference between a company's donation and an investor's private use of money lies on where this money paid from. If there is a spending paid by a company's check, it could be the company's donation if the expense is before the company-tax payment, and it would be definitely the investor's private expense if the spending with the investor's instruction is after the company's tax payment.
听说了今天早上的广播让很多人感觉到一丝悲一丝凉，我就觉得还好啦。你想啊，那几个说这些话的人，如果他们自己要是有个三长两短的，虽说是他们有小孩会在乎他们，那他们的小孩子除了替他们报警之外，还能为他们做什么特别的吗？我的孩子还小还是我的责任义务要保护他们，所以我就自己替自己报警啦。
听说了有一堆以前和我在一个学校上过学的，一个单位上过班的，都纷纷上广播表态他们是打心眼里认为他们自己才是最优秀的，认为我方敏就是不知道自己姓什么而已，我方敏对他们这些人的态度也是一样：”你自己又算老几？你自己也不过就是个什么都不是的狗屎而已，政府雇员也就是个中国的公务员而已，吓死谁啦？我方敏什么情况都从未需要过你的任何狗屁，狗叼和狗髀，也永远没有需要认识你。”
Heard currently there is a lot of confusion about who owns what money or who can spend what money.
My response:
Money's ownership is by law.
The lawful owner of the money is the only authority to spend the money or deny the wrongful use of the money.
It is never whoever's privilege to deny the money's lawful owner's lawful right on how to spend the money.
If anyone wants to open a coffee shop, this person would be advised to apply for a commercial license (registration title or license title), a Tax license (tax id), and a food administrative license. Among this three, only food administrative license is specialized to a coffee shop or a restaurant, the commercial license and tax license are needed by all organizations.
It is by its commercial license and tax license, the paying company is 100% fully owned by its upper investor company such as a British company, and this British company is 100% fully owned by its upper investor company such as a French company.
It is by the paying American company's commercial license (registration title or license title), and by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying American company has never been directly owned by any individual in the U.S, nor in U.K.
It is by the paying American company's commercial license (registration title or license title), by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying company has never been owned by any Rockefeller Houses, nor any Ford Houses, nor any Walton houses.
I have been provided for by several American companies' paying checks, these paying checks have been confronted by individual Americans if these paying checks can be the lawful spending of the paying American companies.
The evidence if all these paying checks are lawful are the facts that all these paying-checks were instructed by these paying American companies' lawfully registered lawful owners.
All these paying checks lawfulness should not be the subject for any individual American to deny.
----August 19th, 2018
Heard the confusion in China is if all these "taking over the money" is lawful in the United States, the same taking over should be lawful in China as well.
My response:
My personal experiences are: I am eligible to call U.S. laws to help and I am protected by laws in the United States.
Regarding the saying that my money is already well-known can be taken by whoever: This is untrue saying.
1: Intellectual Incomes: Rumored it has been taking over by denying my lawfulness of ownership, but I heard it has been officially under law-investigation now.
2: My inherited Trusts: It has been obviously ownership by Laws and valid inheriting by Laws.
3: The money from the American companies paying-checks: Rumored it has been taking over by doubting my lawfulness of using the money. But it is obviously in process of clarifying confusion of who owns what money by Laws, and who can spend what money by Laws.
My personal experiences are: All these taking over the money is never lawful in the United States.
----August 19th, 2018
Heard the confusion in China is if all these "taking over the money" is lawful in the United States, the same taking over should be lawful in China as well.
My response:
My personal experiences are: I am eligible to call U.S. laws to help and I am protected by laws in the United States.
Regarding the saying that my money is already well-known can be taken by whoever: This is untrue saying.
1: Intellectual Incomes: Rumored it has been taking over by denying my lawfulness of ownership, but I heard it has been officially under law-investigation now.
2: My inherited Trusts: It has been obviously ownership by Laws and valid inheriting by Laws.
3: The money from the American companies paying-checks: Rumored it has been taking over by doubting my lawfulness of using the money. But it is obviously in process of clarifying confusion of who owns what money by Laws, and who can spend what money by Laws.
My personal experiences are: All these taking over the money is never lawful in the United States.
----August 19th, 2018
08-16-2018 THE DTA money-taken story was in 2007
Heard this morning's broadcasting that the same glamor European Spanish took money from DTA.
My response:
I heard it yesterday.
If anyone wants to open a coffee shop, this person would be advised to apply for a commercial license (registration title or license title), a Tax license (tax id), and a food administrative license. Among this three, only food administrative license is specialized to a coffee shop or a restaurant, the commercial license and tax license are needed by all organizations.
It is by its commercial license and tax license, the paying company is 100% fully owned by its British investor company, and the British company is 100% fully owned by its French investor company.
It is by the paying company's commercial license (registration title or license title), by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying company has never been owned by any individual in the U.S, nor in U.K.
It is by the paying company's commercial license (registration title or license title), by the paying company's IRS tax-id, the paying company has never been owned by any Rockefeller House, nor any Ford Houses, nor any Walton houses.
I have been angry that when the husband's family never owns the paying company, and when the glamor wife took the money paid by the paying company's company-check, but the husband keeps telling everyone he is such a family man. What this suppose to mean when my providing money from the company-check been taken by the couple who I never had any romance association with?
Let me illustrate what I mean. There is a restaurant and its lawful owner is a couple by the restaurant's license registration & tax id. The owner-wife paid to a hospital her maiden parents' medical care by a restaurant's check. Well, there is a glamor wife went to the hospital and tells the hospital she is a wife and she dislikes her husband's family's money to pay for the owner-wife's maiden parents, so she took the money from the hospital. And the glamor husband went on telling everybody he is such a family man.
But the glamor couple is not the co-owners of the restaurant, the glamor husband's family does not have the restaurant's ownership either. And the glamor husband is never the lover of the owner-wife. The two couples know each other but never co-own the restaurant nor romantically ever associated.
I am the maiden parents equivalent as the restaurant's upstream investor. The BTD and DTA are the hospital equivalent. The seriousness is the money was paid in 2004 but taken from BTD and DTA in 2007.
----August 16th, 2018
08-15-2018 My current lodging situation (我现在的居屋）
I remembered my current residence was reserved on July 1st of 2004, and I am 80% certain the unit I am currently living in is the unit reserved because it fits the discussion that I had participated. I heard the rent was paid on the same day of July 1st of 2004 to HUD and locked in BHA by HUD. I moved-in in February of 2013.（我记得我现在所住的房子是2004年7月1日就预定的，我有八成的把握我现在住的这个套房就是所预定的那套，因为周围环境符合我当时所参与的讨论。我听说这房租在2004年7月1日那天就已经付掉了，并由HUD锁定在其BHA的账户里。我是2013年2月搬入。）
I heard the glamor European Spanish who took the money from BHA in 2007 is the wife of the featured person in the Virginia-Washington Regional Hyatt's bar story in 2003, who was also the 30-years old featured person in the Tokyo Airport's romance story in 1980.（我听说从BHA把钱给拿走的那个漂亮的欧洲西班牙人是做老婆的，丈夫就是2003年维吉尼亚州--华盛顿州交界处的凯悦酒店酒吧故事的那个男主角，和八十年代的东京机场罗曼故事的那个30多岁的男主角是同一个人。）
I heard the female featured in the Tokyo airport romance story currently works for the Chinese Foreign department is possibly the reason the Chinese government is so angry regarding the benefits I received as if all these benefits have ever been from the Chinese government.（我听说东京机场罗曼故事的那个女主角目前是中国政府外交部的工作人员，有可能是中国政府对我享受美国政府福利愤怒至极的原因，我感觉这愤怒的程度就好像我拿到的每一分钱的美国政府福利都是由中国政府在付钱似的。）
I heard that in Boston city, the driving force to evict me from all these government agency's help is the Boston Chinese community, it is rumored all these "I don't give shits to" is organized by the C-Mart supermarkets' owners who are affiliated with the $10,000 per month since 1967 story.（我听说，在波士顿本地闹得天翻地覆，就是要把我从美国政府的福利系统赶出去的组织者就是波士顿的中国城超市的股东们，就是他们是和那个自1967年起每月一万美金寄中国的故事有密切关系的。）
I heard the $10,000 per month story shares the same Spanish investor company with the glamor European Spanish's husband's family story（我听说每月一万元的故事和那个漂亮的欧洲西班牙人的丈夫家里的故事是由同一家西班牙投资公司所投资的。）.
I don't know if my food and cash expenses had been paid on July 1st of 2004 as well, and I don't know if all these what I heard could be real, so I have contacted the Authority agencies about my current situation and the pressure I am facing. Yeah, exactly, have I been someone who intends to live on other people's money that deserved to be evicted, or I am just someone who got stuck in a legal situation that needs government agencies' reaching-out help?（我不知道我的食品现金给付是否也在2004年7月1日那天就已经支付，我也不知道我所听到的这些是否都是真实，所以我已经联络相应的美国政府机关提及我现在的情况以及我所面临的压力。是啊，我究竟是一个想赖着花别人的钱，就是应该被从福利机构给赶走的人？还是一个莫名其妙被困在法律事物当中需要美国政府援助的一个人？）
----August 15th, 2018
08-14-2018 I never bilked into my success in 2004.
Heard this still has been an issue regarding how I could be the major featured person of the radio program.
My response:
I heard how I was invited into the meeting has been the serious issue for the reasons that I don't deserve the major featured person fee because I "bilked" this opportunity to make $3.5 Billion + more from a radio program without a bit of appreciation showed towards the group I "bilked".
I thought this has been cleared but I realized it probably has not because yesterday I received a letter obviously don't take me as the person in need of financial help because of some legal situation but have the credential to pay off any debt easily with this $3.5Billion income. I still don't know what has been the confusion because my side story has been a very simple inheriting case that expanded to chatroom talks which sparked the creation of this radio program.
I worked for Janus Associated since September of 1999 and I had finished the Window login replacement project sometime before August of 2003. This is the project I expected to pay me off handsomely because of its no-password login module and secure encrypted data-transmitting module. I requested to move up to Boston of Massachusetts for the reason I could work with the Boston team on this project if they had any issues with the prototype I handed in.
It was after this relocation to Boston of Massachusetts, I attended a seminar n the Biometric industry with Janus Associates colleagues in Washington area where I met David Petraeus in a Hyatt hotel's lobby area which was in September or October of 2003. I relocated back to Stamford of Connecticut in November of 2003.
I was called into a conference meeting in January of 2004 by my green card application representing attorney. I heard earlier that this was organized by a lady attorney who I had received a phone call from in the year 2000 which was about if I need immigration sponsorship. I heard recently the attorney stated that he was asked by an investor to David Petraeus' family business to schedule this meeting. This investor of David Petraeus' family business has been a French company's American investment. This is the same company I claimed has [aid for my this year's living expenses currently.
This French company's American investment has been an investor to Lehman Brothers was the reason that my outrageous "ideas" about "a Lehman brothers investor" on July 1st of 2004 was not a criminal activity after Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008. I have explained on this blog publicly to Lehman Brothers management as well as its staff after I heard I myself have been its investor that it was never because I had any issue against its management nor its board of directors, nor I insisted on to make troubles. It is true that CDC or subprime mortgages related issues had been the real reason. Now I am apologizing to all the impacts because of confusions related to this.
I was called by this same attorney to his office on June 30th of 2004. The meeting started off with forbidding to contact David Petraeus" because he was a married U.S. military officer then. I was told it was the official order from the U.S. Military.
I was called by this same attorney to his office on the next day which was July 1st of 2004. This meeting was based on my request of entrusting my inherited wealth. I inherited on the same day on June 30th of 2004, but it was sometime after that U.S. Military's order I mentioned above.
This radio program was created on July 1st of 2004, in the same meeting I entrusted my inherited wealth.
I was never invited into any of all these 2004's telemeetings by David Petraeus or his Rockefeller relatives. I never bilked myself as a Rockefeller associated to be in any of 2004's teleconferences. I was invited by my own name Min Fang because of my own matters. The only reason that associated with David Petraeus and how I was invited into all 2004's meetings was the U.S. Military order which forbade me to contact David Petraeus before his retirement from the U.S. Military.
----August 14th, 2018
08-13-2018 Any thought or research can be expressed in a couple of lines if thoughtfully refined,
听说了今天早上提到的“为什么一个中国公民身份的演员在广播上对美国的智慧产权疑问做权威发言？”
我的回应：
我也是和这一拨人有很大的矛盾。据说他们就是1967年开始非法扣留了我每月的一万美金生活费的于家。据说是北京人民艺术剧院的老演员于是之，或者艺术界的于曙光的一，二等亲之类的。所以全是一些中国的演员在吵啊闹啊，他们就是什么都够资格。什么都是这一群中国公民（演员）在广播剧上指手画脚，对所有一切事物当权威。
谁给他们的广播公司话筒？据说是：中国政府的外交部，阿尔伯特·高尔及其曾任中国外交部工作人员的于姓女友，以及那六个"自己乐意就算是美国的广播公司董事会”的美国人。广播公司的地址就在纽约洛克菲勒中心的其中一栋楼里。
----2018年8月13日。
Heard this morning's Viagra argument.
My response:
I heard the first one of my intellectual income checks from the Viagra patent was taken by a couple of court police officers after that morning's "I rule" broadcasting. I heard no 911 call was made because another phone number was given as a 911 substitute which was understood as a precinct's direct line, I heard this was the reason why no 911 police officer responded the call.
I was asked what would happen if a 911 call was made? I heard the 911 police officials would ask the court police officials to present the court ruling in-prints. A U.S. judicial court ruling in-prints have the ruling district court and this Viagra check's legal case references for the 911 police officers to verify the lawful validation of the court police officers' check-collecting.
As I said some time ago, the Viagra's company acknowledged my contribution to the Viagra, and I never complained about the reward size and I am very happy with the reward size I have been granted by the Viagra company. So, there has been no such legal case in any district court ever that's regarding the reward of my intellectual contribution to the Viagra. So, if a 911 call was made on the day when the first check was issued, this confusion, if radio program's performing "Judge ruling" broadcasting could possibly be a valid Judge's ruling, would have been clarified already.
I was asked if the reward of my contribution was fairly evaluated because it was only "one line speech". This confusion is definitely ridiculous enough. Any thought or research can be concluded and expressed in a couple of lines of speech or a couple of pages of papers if thoughtfully refined to put into a speech or on papers. A politician's campaign speech possibly have one theme to be expressed clearly in just one word such as "change" in 2008, but it definitely never worth only 6-alphabets as its value.
I was asked how about those who had worked in the lab research or clinical research but did not receive any recognition in the reward format of patent-income reward. Well, all Viagra-research participants have received recognization of their contribution in the reward format of their researchers' salaries, all their hard-working research hours, their efforts and their successes, together with their salary-recognitions they already have received would all have been part of the evaluation for the recognition in the format of the patent-income, theoretically. But I was never part of the Viagra's lab or clinic research efforts, so I don't know anything more than what I had joked about which was I had contributed an increased-portion of reward size to the clinical research team as a team member.
As I joked almost a year ago, if my contribution was evaluated individually, the financial number will be much greater than any researchers who have worked for years because Viagra was just on-market when the contribution-evaluation was conducted. I have helped the company to save a lot of money on research and to make the sales early than expected which would definitely put into an advantageous position in the evaluation. The Viagra's company's research team rejected me to be their evaluation-team member was the reason the Viagra's company decided to put me into the team-evaluation with the Viagra's clinical research team. That was what I joked about. I have been very happy I had caught the opportunity to contribute to the Viagra. My contribution was made on a June's Sunday in 2004 which was received by the Viagra's company on the same day.
----August 13th, 2018
About the confusion of the board of directors room.
My response:
First of all, only a stock-company has a board of directors. Board of directors' room is a room-space which is dedicated to hosting the board of directors' meetings. Board of directors is a group of investors' representatives which should not be grouped on the voluntary basis because the room-space is limited to host a certain amount of people only while a public trading company may have over 5 digits of public investors.
It needs the qualified investor's lawful valid authorization to eligible a person to be a member of the board of directors.
----August 13th, 2018
08-11-2018 I refuse to provide for whoever's ex-marriage partner（我拒绝向别人的前妻前夫支付离婚生活费）
Heard this morning's talk sparked confusion about my advice on July 1st of 2004.（听说今天早上的播出内容触发了对我2004年7月1日所建议内容的一些困扰。）
My response:（我的回应：）
On July 1st of 2004, I was making the financial arrangement about my possible biological children from pregnant mothers. I was asked by someone who was having a headache if considering some more children from his current marriage a good idea when he already has some adult children. I was asked what my advice would be as a female polygamist having a male's privilege.
（2004年7月1日那天，我是安排我自己可能会由代理孕母生出的亲生小孩的财务相关事宜。有人说他现在为了是不是在有了成年子女后应该再有几个小孩很头疼。这人就问我这样一个一妻多夫者是如何看待这个问题的，会如何建议？）
I spoke out of my understanding from a polygamist marriage as a traditional polygamist: "A marriage partner is for life and there should be no legal reason for a divorce". I also understand that biological children from any non-polygamist marriage are all life-long relationships as well, but the marriage partner is purely from the willingness. *An unfaithful marriage female partner in a traditional multi-wives polygamist marriage would face a denounce never a divorce.
(我作为传统观念的一妻多夫者，我对传统一夫多妻婚姻的理解是：“婚姻是终身的，没有什么离婚的”。我也理解对一个一夫一妻的婚姻来说，婚姻所出的亲生孩子们统统是终身的血脉相连，而婚姻伴侣则是谁则是完全个人的自由意愿。*传统的一夫多妻婚姻中出轨的女方只会面对废除从来不是什么离婚。）
Based on my own understanding of the non-polygamist marriage, I said if the future family inheriting is the only concern about more children, why not make the financial arrangement for the younger children at the time when each would be born?
(处于我自己对于一夫一妻婚姻的理解，我对那人说如果担心家里如何分家产是造成头疼是否该多要几个孩子的原因，那为什么不在每一个新的孩子将出生的时候就为这个孩子做好财务安排？）
There was someone else asked at this time that he was having the headache of a possible financial settlement for a divorce but he did not do the financial arrangement when his not-same-mother children were born, I said he could just separate children's settlement with the mother's if he would be in the situation to consider such financial arrangement, he would feel much comfortable this way to take very good care of his children who are his blood no matter what his marriage situation would be.
（
I was not taught but this separating the mother's financial arrangement with the child(ren) has been my family's tradition. My family has been a long history polygamist family that till my grandfather's generation had first-ever one mother's children's family inheriting in 1907 or so. My great-grandmother was the first ever dowager of my family who got a very good financial arrangement from my great-grandfather that was the best ever.
In my family, the tradition has been the wives got lifetime financial arrangements from the dying husband but family inheriting belongs to his children only. The wives could have lifetime financial arrangements was because there was no such imagination before 1907 that a wife would be expected to re-marry. And I can totally imagine that possibly there is no divorcee would love to see the divorced partner to move on to a new romance happily by the divorce settlement.
I heard there are a lot of in-marriage partners have been participating in this fight of having a better financial settlement. I don't know if those who talked them into participating in this fight are actually cursing their own marriages because a divorce settlement only exists for a divorced marriage. Their own wealthy marriage partners won't understand their participation in any other way.
I myself is wondering who need to fight this "better divorce settlement" against me or my money? I have been living alone all this time to eligible nobody. Is this fight actually to ask me to pay for whoever's ex-marriage partners? Is it the similar scheme as the intellectual income should be re-assigned to some sexual partners?
I refuse to provide for whoever's ex-marriage partner.
----August 11th, 2018
08-09-2018 Why this radio program is all about the Public Armed Robbery or the Public Armed Abducting?（为什么这个广播剧的制作宗旨好像不是抢劫就是绑架？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting about inheriting related tax（听说了今天早上所播出的继承税）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I am very happy I am the person eligible to donate Estate tax to the Federal and inheriting tax to Connecticut. According to the United States tax laws, it is absolutely my freedom to decide how much I feel comfortable to donate or when to donate. Currently, I feel comfortable to donate according to my intellectual tax contribution. The taxes would not be paid by my living expenses budgeted nor those paid-outs of my living expenses.
(我很开心我是够资格捐联邦继承税及捐康州继承税的一个人。按照美国的税法，什么时候捐税及捐多少税就是完全按照我自己的意愿了。目前我是愿意参照我应缴纳的智慧产权税来捐遗产税。这些税收既不会从我的生活费用预算里支付，也不会从那些已经支付给我的（但还未收到的）我的生活费用里扣除。）
In early 2015, I was in the situation that I could not receive scheduled living expenses providing had prompted me to call law enforcement's help to check out if I did inherit anything. Later I heard the living expenses were all paid out as scheduled, but there have been soo many doubts if I inherited was because the attorney who informed me to the teleconference meetings don't remember anything other than he did schedule both meetings on June 30th of 2004 and July 1st of 2004.
（2015年1月，我当时就是因为受不到预期的生活费用给付而报警处理希望警方调查一下我的继承究竟是真是假。后来听说我的生活费用给付都已经按时付出，但因为通知我参加2004年6月30日及7月1日电讯会议的律师除了记得有安排我开会之外就什么都不记得，所以有很多人不相信我的继承是真实的而造成我收不到生活费用给付。）
I heard there were some people attained the meeting also had the same frustration that the person who informed them to attain the meeting did not know anything about inheriting related. Other than I can clarify my inheriting is the sole beneficiary Trust-inheriting, I really don't know anything about their possible stories at all. So, I advise them from my own experience: Contact the law enforcement with all the references you can provide, either your local law enforcement agency or also the informer's resident's local law enforcement agency. It is unlikely anyone without any lawful authorization could help you to do the necessary search on any financial matter or if you had inherited anything.
（我听说还有一些人也有类似遭遇，就是通知他们参加某个讨论过什么继承话题的会议的人完全不知道他们有没有什么可以继承的。我除了强调我自己的继承是唯一受益人的信托继承之外，我就完全不知道他们这些人的故事可能会是什么了。所以，从我自己的经历，我建议他们报警处理，提供他们所知道的一切信息给他们自己所居住国家的当地警方以及通知他们参加什么继承会议的那个人所居住国家的当地警方。在没有正当法律授权的情况下，没有人可以帮助他们进行必要的财务调查或者是否有继承财产的调查。）
I can totally imagine what is like when all you know is you were informed to be in a meeting that inheriting was discussed while you have your own family stories about wealth as well. Please contact your local government agency with all the references you can provide. My inheriting is totally nothing to do with your possible inheritable.
（我很能想象那些家里有财产故事的人被通知参加什么谈论过继承话题的会议会是什么样一份焦虑心情。请通知你们当地的政府机关并提供你们所知道的一切信息。你们是否有什么财产可以继承和我信托继承完全没有任何关系。）
I figured that this morning's intention is to "donate" the paid-out $400Million a year living expenses without my own willingness in order to continue the abducting me in financial poverty efforts. I refuse to donate any taxes from the already paid-out $400Million a year living expense. I refuse to let my tax-donation willingness to become the excuses to make myself a victim of possible armed public abducting nor possible armed public robbery.
（我估计今天早上这集的目的就是要违背我本人的意愿“捐税了”我的每年4亿的生活费用给付，继续把我绑架在贫穷里。我拒绝从我每年的4亿的生活费用里捐税。我拒绝将我自己的捐税意愿变成让我成为武装绑架武装抢劫的受害者的借口。）
----August 9th, 2018
Regarding the confusion over why China's government representatives not presented in my inheriting meeting on June 30th of 2004.（有关为什么没有中国政府官员出席2004年6月30日我的继承会议的疑问）
My response: （我的回应：）
My Trust-inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was by Laws that neither the entrusting groups nor myself would need any authorization from the Chinese government even though I was a Chinese citizen, and I spoke fluent English myself which means I didn't need Chinese representatives to do any language translations. So, not a single Chinese government's representative attended to my inheriting meeting.
（我在2004年6月30日的信托继承是根据法律继承，所以虽然我当时是中国公民，但代表那些信托的律师团及我本人都不需要中国政府的任何授权，而且我本人可以用流利英语表达，也不需要中国政府代表作为语言交流的翻译。所以没有任何一个中国政府官员出席我的信托继承会议。）
----August 9th, 2018
08-08-2018 Exactly, what are the confusions about Shanghai Investments (究竟有关上海的投资有些什么困扰啊？）
Heard there are rumors in Shanghai that if I receive my living expenses providing, somebody dares to forcefully replace a CEO from a Shanghai investment（听说了上海在传说是只要我能拿到生活费用给付，就会有某人敢把某家上海外资企业的总经理给武力置换了）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard this somebody is not my blood associated and the investment is not from the Hong Kong Trust. I heard my father's sister's marriage issue is one of the confusion（我听说这某人和我没什么血缘关系，这个投资企业也和香港信托没有关系.我听说是我父亲妹妹的婚姻问题造成了这份困扰。）
1: Since 1989, it is well-known that one of my father's sister's children is not from her marriage. And I am ok with that.（从1989年起，很多人就听说了我父亲妹妹的一个小孩可能不是婚生子，而我好像不是很在意。）
Why shouldn't I? I am her maiden brother's child, why shouldn't say such things as "why not try to move on when the child was already 14 years old in 1989?” I heard the couples fought often on the child's possible birth-origin, and I heard my father's sister always emphasized she raised this child by her own money from her maiden father or her own (much higher) salary. Also, it is true that divorce was not an option in China for a marriage in their generation. She got married in her 30s after my grandfather's death, and her husband was not a college-graduated as herself. Why should I take her marriage issue beyond her private matter?
（1：从1989年起，很多人就听说了我父亲妹妹的一个小孩可能不是婚生子，而我好像不是很在意。）
我为什么会在意啊，我是女方娘家哥哥的小孩，我为什么不应该劝劝说些”你现在说这些，那你是想继续过日子还是想怎样啊？这孩子都已经14岁了”。我是有听说夫妻俩吵架时女方始终强调女方自己是用自己娘家给的钱或者自己的高工资自己养的这个小孩。更何况在中国，离婚在他们那一辈根本就是没有可能。她是我爷爷去世以后结的婚，结婚时都已经三十多岁了，她本人大学毕业，丈夫不是大学毕业生。哪里轮得到我把她的婚姻问题超越她自己的私事范畴？）
2: I don't have any bias against the children from or not from the marriage.
Why would I? I am their birth mother's maiden brother's child, as long as they both from her belly, why would I have any bias on who is from the marriage?
（2：我对是否婚生好像没有态度上的区别？
我为什么要有态度上的区别？我是女方娘家哥哥的小孩，只要两个孩子都是女方自己肚皮生下来的，我作为女方娘家亲眷，哪里会在乎是否婚生啊？）
3: I still missed a link here: I can definitely get my living expenses provided lawfully in the U.S. via the American companies, but how this becomes the eligibility to forcefully replace a CEO in Shanghai investments? These investments are obviously not from the Hong Kong Trust that was set up by my father's father.
(3： 我还是不明白：我是肯定可以在美国合法拿到我自己所继承的信托通过美国公司给付的生活费用的，可是这怎么就成了某人可以把一个外企的总经理给武力置换了的资格啦？这些外企都是很明确肯定不是我父亲的父亲所设立的香港信托所投资的。）
In my family's generational inheriting history, under-age children would each receive a Trust, which was the size of his inheritable share, from the dying father as a family tradition in family-inheriting. It is not unimaginable that some of my grandfathers from different generations would set up an additional Trust as a gift to the unborn-yet-me.（在我们家的继承分家产的家史上，每一代分家产时，未成年的儿子们每人都会收到一个由病危老父亲所设立的信托，所受到信托的大小规模也就是这个儿子所分到的家产份额。所以我有几代的爷爷们再额外设立一个信托作为礼物给还未出生的我并不是什么难以想象的事情。）
Hong Kong Trust as an example, it is obviously well-understood as being part of what my grandfather had been willing to give to my father, because the Hong Kong Trust was set up for me, and I was expected as a girl who would be from my father's line, which means the Hong Kong Trust I received was understood as the part of the heir son's share that my grandfather willing to give to my father. The Hong Kong Trust was set up in 1948, it was 17 years before my grandfather's death in 1965 so that my Trust-inheriting should not be understood as if taking advantage of my father's siblings. It should be the same for all other Trusts I inherited so that my Trust-inheriting should not be understood as if my inheriting means taking advantage of each settler's other offspring's inheritable share.（就以香港信托作为例子，就因为这个信托是为我设立的，而我应该是我父亲的小孩，所以很明显这个信托是我父亲的父亲愿意分给我父亲的财产的一部分。香港信托是1948年设立的，而我父亲的父亲是香港信托设立17年之后的1965年才去世的，所以我继承香港信托不应该被认为是我抢了我父亲弟妹所应该分到的我爷爷的财产。对于我所继承的其他信托来说也是一样，我继承了这个那个信托不应该被理解成我抢了信托设立人的其他子女的可继承份额。）
The generational family inheriting at my father's father's generation was in 1930 which was the first time ever same mother's children family inheriting, this certainly means my Trust-Inheriting in 2004 should not have any confusion at all with all other lines' offspring generationally. The closest generational family inheriting was in 1965, my father's father had his own written letters which were his last wills handed in-person to each of his children who were my father and his siblings. So, my Trust inheriting in 2004 should have no confusion with my father's sibling as well.（我爷爷即我父亲的父亲那一代分家产是在1930年，这是我家有史以来第一次是由同一个妈妈生的孩子们在分家产，这当然是很清楚地表明我2004年继承信托是和我家历史上各房各代的其他所有子女都没有任何关系。我家历史上最近的一次分家产是1965年我爷爷去世时，我父亲的父亲是亲自给了他的每一个子女一份亲笔信也就是我爷爷给了我父亲及我父亲的弟妹每人一份他的亲笔遗嘱。所以，我2004年继承信托也不应该会让我父亲的弟妹们很困绕。）
I had expressed myself the reason why I was willing to gift to my grandfather's siblings was that if my father was not being "skipped" but inherited Hong Kong Trust, he would willing to gift to his uncle and his aunt, the same to his siblings. So, I do the gifting for my father. (我从2004年就一直有说，我愿意送礼物给我爷爷的弟妹是因为如果是我父亲继承了香港信托，而不是被“绕过去了”，我父亲是会愿意送给他的叔叔娘娘一份和他自己弟妹一样大小规模的礼物的。所以，我就替我父亲送了这个礼物了。）
----August 8th, 2018
08-07-2018 就是和你没有关系就得 （"We Don't like this person very much")
听说了今天早上提到的“希望还能有个自己亲生的小孩”(Heard this morning's talk about "Just hope to have a biological child.")
我的回应：(My response:)
谁家碰到这种事，都是挺烦心，要是再碰上个坚持就是乐意说这是自由意志所宣言的婚姻自由，那也就只能和我的态度差不多了，也就是"选择不闻不问了，就是和你没有关系就得”。(Whoever in this situation would make the entire family in turmoils, well, one can certainly imagine what it will be like if the one in this situation insisted on this is the free-willed marriage-freedom. Being a family to someone in this situation, what else can I do but state "I choose to have no contacts, I got nothing to do with this person.")
我也听说了今天早上的“We don't like this person very much."所表达“很不喜欢（方敏）这个人”的立场。（I also heard "We don't like this person very much" from this morning's broadcasting which means "We don't like this person (Min Fang) very much".）
----2018年8月7日。
08-06-2018 What is this morning's broadcasting? Oh, a comedy of black jokes (今天早上所播出的都是些什么呀？奥， 也就是一堆的黑色幽默相声啦）
In China, a standup comedy show type that can have one performer's which is called the Single Xiangsheng（单口相声), or more than one performers, called the Crosstalk Xiangsheng（多口相声). The crosstalk Xiangsheng（多口相声）normally grouped by one front talker plus the commenting or contradicting voices to make a show. I assume this crosstalk Xiangsheng（多口相声）is this morning's broadcasting artistic structure. (在中国，相声有两种，单口相声或者多口相声。多口相声一般是有一个讲故事的主寅演员再加几个对故事内容表达不同意见或者进行评论的配寅演员来进行演出。我估计多口相声是今天早上所播出内容的艺术表达形式。）
The U.S citizenship talks: Loud announcing voices and low mild contradicting voices are cousins, the technique is to let the "You won't be a citizen" impression to stay.
（有关美国公民的片段：响亮宣布的声音和那些很轻很柔的不同意见的声音是三四个堂兄妹一家子。技巧就在于让听众就只记得”你不会是个美国公民啦”）
Who are they, why legitimate process?
Oh, they are O'Connors.
(说话的那几个都是谁啊？为什么说是通过立法程序后？
奥，他们几个都是欧家的少爷和小姐啦。）
Why they are so emotional about your immigration status?
Oh, my entry visa to the U.S. was a visitor's B1 visa. I was invited to the U.S. by an investment of the "O's confusion" fund company, the same "O's confusion" fund which has been the American investment from the French company which provides the lawful eligibility for me to claim: "I am the French Financier".
（为什么他们对你的移民身份这么在意啊？
奥，我当初进入美国是持B1（短期访问参观）签证。我是被美国的“欧家困扰”基金公司所投资的一个美国企业所邀请来美国的，还记得我宣称我自己是“英国东印度公司的法国投资人”吗，我这么自我宣称自己投资了一家法国公司不是莫名其妙的而是有法律基础的，而这家美国的“欧家困扰”基金公司就是这一家法国公司所投资的。）
The Pardon announced in 2007 on the radio was addressed to the inappropriateness of how I was invited, not that I had a legal immigration case.
(那个2007年所播出的赦免令是针对我受邀来美国过程中的一些不恰当的地方，并不是因为我有一个移民官司需要赦免令才能结案。）
So, I am a U.S. citizen has been a True Statement.
（所以，我是美国公民一直是真实陈述。)
----August 6th, 2018
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony's creator talks: The "she is so annoying" announcement is the purpose of this talk, which is to express how awful I am to alert everyone who doesn't even have any kind of association with me. I don't need to say a lot to fight against this saying on this blog because this saying is a serious criminal law matter in the United States that may take a trial to clear the public impression, the same seriousness as who is the authentic 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony's creator.
（2008年北京奥运会开幕式创意的那一段：宣称“她得罪了太多人了”是这一段所想要表达的，目的就是想要提醒所有还不认识方敏本人并且和方敏本人没有任何交往关系的人知道方敏其实是个什么样的人。就像谁才是2008北京奥运会的创意人一样，这在美国都是非常严肃的可能牵涉到美国刑事法律范畴的事情，可能会需要有刑事诉讼官司来彻底澄清事件真相的，所以我不需要在这博客上多费唇舌来反击来辩解这些故意恶意的行为所制造的恶劣影响。）
So,（所以,)
I am the 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony's authentic Creator has been a True Statement. （我是2008北京奥运会开幕式闭幕式的创意人一直都是真实陈述。）
I was not "so annoying" to everyone before my Trust-inheriting in 2004 is a True Statement as well. （我在2004年继承信托之前从来没有如此招人讨厌也真实陈述。）
----August 6th, 2018
08-04-2018 My lawfully valid Trust-inheriting eligible me to claim I am the British East India Company's French Financier
I am the sole beneficiary of the Trust that has been the upstream investor to the famous British East India Company's French Financer company. My lawfully valid Trust-Inheriting was on June 30th of 2004.
The same as the Hong Kong Trust which was also set up before I was born, I am the sole beneficiary of this several hundred years ancient Trust because I am the "female family birthmark" clearly specified in the settler's letter with an illustration of the birthmark. The Hong Kong Trust entity's management has already explained on the radio program that the settler's letter has a birthmark illustration attached.
The accurate definitions of the word "Trust", the word "Inheriting", and the word "beneficiary" are according to the Merriam-Webster English Dictionary, the accurate definition of the word "sole "is according to the Merriam-Webster English Thesaurus.
Definition of Inherit
2. a: to receive from an ancestor as a right or title descendible by law at the ancestor's death.
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inheriting)
Definition of Trust
3. b: a combination of firms or corporations formed by a legal agreement; especially: one that reduces or threatens to reduce competition
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trust )
Definition of Beneficiary
2 a law: the person designated to receive the income of an estate that is subject to a trust.
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/beneficiary )
Synonyms and Antonyms of Sole
1: belonging only to the one person, unit, or group named.
(source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/sole )
----August 4th, 2018
08-03-2018 我选择捍卫我自己及我父母的人身财产安全
听说了今天早上所播出的我父母的亲生儿子坚持婚姻自由坚决要求财务给付的立场。
我是方敏，我本人是亲身经历了我父母亲生的儿子为了他自己的婚姻自由，嫌我父母在我父母用我父母自己工资购买的房子里非常多余碍事，我认为我父母的亲生儿子是自己愿意为了他自己的婚姻自由让我父母“双亡”也没有任何悲伤，我甚至怀疑他本人是否参与谋杀我父亲。我方敏拒绝我亲生父母的亲生儿子所提出的任何财务要求，我方敏已经表达和我亲生父母的亲生儿子的婚姻家庭既没有任何法律上的责任义务关系，也没有任何意愿上的任何关联。
我本人也亲身了中国政府为了捍卫我父母亲生儿子的这一份婚姻自由，完全无视我父亲2013年时是中国公民的事实，中国政府在国际舆论上的立场表达就是中国政府为了捍卫婚姻自由就不会在乎所牵涉到的其他中国公民的人生财产安全。中国政府所持有的立场就是完全不会在乎中国是否还是法制国家，中国政府的一切立场言论就只有中国政府非常在乎性交女人奶子屁股利益的国际舆论表达，这一切都是我方敏亲身经历。
所以，我方敏不应该是愿意看着我亲生父母的亲生儿子为了他自己的婚姻自由而死绝拉到，但我方敏选择不过问我亲生父母的亲生儿子为了他自己的婚姻自由而如何生活。
我方敏选择捍卫我自己及我父母的人身财产安全，我方敏选择捍卫我自己的合法权益，我方敏选择协助我的父母捍卫他们的合法权益。
----2018年8月3日。
-----------------------------------------
| Mar 16  | | ||
中国纽约领事馆，南京紫金山天文台, 方xx，你们好：
以下的博克文章可能是口气有点重，
方敏
2018年3月16日。
我的回应：
在我得知我弟弟支持我的父母年迈后是不需要有人在乎是否冷了饿了
我不会要求他们以及他们背后那些人的改变，
我相信我的父亲很好，我也在找我母亲的故事。
----2018年3月16日。
| Apr 22 | | ||
你好：
听说了和我同父同母的方xx以及他的婚姻家庭陈家相关人士担心我
我的立场回应：请将你们的想法向特别在乎你们的立场，
我方敏拒绝方xx的婚姻家庭以及他妻子娘家的陈家人士支付我的任
此致，
谢谢。
方敏
2018年4月22日在美国波士顿。
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
08-02-2018 This morning's broadcasting of the anger related to the wealth I announced.
1: "Announce to own".
My response: This anger is ridiculous and untrue.
I announced them in 2017-2018 after they had provided for me according to their lawfully registered lawful owners' clear instructions. All four companies have acknowledged four Trust entities I inherited are their upstream investors. Two of these four companies' paying checks to my living expenses already have been verified as upon lawful instructions as well. The other two companies are in process of clarifying. All these four Trust entities I inherited are over 500 years ancient.
----August 2nd, 2018
2: "No such big sized company in New York city without a grand building"
My response: This anger is ridiculous and untrue.
These companies are all Fund companies which means they are all financial institutes but not banks which further means no crowded customers to need huge spaces for.
----August 2nd, 2018
3:"Why it has to be your money?"
My response: This anger is ridiculous, dangerous and unlawful.
In the United States, this anger means the intention of illegally taking over the lawful ownership of lawfully owned money, this is the anger may trigger the crime of larceny or the crime of robbery.
In the United States, any money's legal ownership is decided by U.S. laws, not by deservedness nor wishes.
In the United States, the legal ownership is what law enforcement protecting.
In the United States, if there are lawful doubts over money's ownership, a civil lawsuit or a criminal investigation are the lawful means to clarify money's ownership.
----August 2nd, 2018
4: "Why you refuse to bow to my wife?"
My response: This anger is ridiculous, pathetic, sick and psycho.
I am a female who never fancy your wife's sexuality nor your wife's reproductive function. When I don't eat on you, don't sleep on you, and don't intend to be around your sickness, I certainly have no obligation nor need to privilege your marriage.
----August 2nd, 2018
08-01-2018 This morning's theme is obviously to contradict who I am
Heard this morning's talk about Roche Brothers' ownership.
My response:
Roche Brothers is a supermarket chain that has been very popular in Boston Massachusetts area, I assumed I may have "my enveloped money" provided by this Roche Brothers was what I had stated on this blog July 30th of 2018. My assumption does not involve any ownership confusion because I have the same question of "Do you have my money reserved at your place" for the Boston government agencies as well, and my assumption may only mean Roche Brothers' supermarket's store gift cards
I heard Roche Brothers chain is 100% privately owned. I heard this morning's anger was caused by the confusion who owns this Roche Brothers chain. I heard this confusion was sparked by a company which was registered in March of 2017 which has nothing to do with Roche Brothers at all, but the words of mouths caused severe confusion who owns the Roche Brothers.
----August 1st, 2018
Exactly, what was the theme of this morning broadcasting?
My response:
The theme of this morning's broadcasting was to contradict everything about who I am.
Example: I am a female resident who has well known lived alone for over 14 years without any social, but this doesn't evidently enough compares to the broadcasted comments from those males' authoritative saying on the matter of who I am. I accused this is an organized sexual harassment.
"Everyone in Boston, Massachusetts already know you don't have any money" because it was broadcasted on the radio program and on local radio to contradict everything of who I am. And this does not include all these authoritative figures' public or private opinions on the matter or about who I am. Now, you can imagine what my situation has been. It has been all over the Boston area since 2016, even in a coffee shop of Dunkin Donuts.
Also, I heard there was some radio broadcasted announcement equivalent or promotion similar in Boston area about who owns the American "Pejoves" Fund company as well. Those broadcasting were jokingly mentioning the owner of a 2007-registered 10 years old company is the real person who owns the American "Pejoves" Fund's most upstream investor which wrongfully impressed the audiences as if this only 10 years old, 2007-registered company owns the 400 years old American "Pejoves" Fund company as well as its entire ancient investor chain.
I heard there is another announcement similar to this, by a different person on a national TV in Spain and by a different reason as well. The given-reason for the ownership in Spain was not because of a company registration but because she has commercially married to a huge Mr. American whose family name never associated with the American "Pejoves" Fund company nor its investor chain.
----August 1st, 2018
07-31-2018 Why Mr. David R's clan kept on picking up on me?
I don't know what is the matter with this David R's clan. I never met anyone of them in person, but I had lived in New York City between 1996-2003 so I might have shared New York City's streets with them.
This clan had invested movies such as Avatar, 007 Quantum and 007 Millenium, etc. but my intellectual income from these movies were pre-company taxes' business expenses which should have nothing to do with them being investors.
I have claimed 4 American Funds companies as the following list, all of which have been operating on the American soil since 1600 or so. All of these have never owned nor operated by any R's name historically. I have claimed each having $200Billion size on this blog since the year of 2017 according to the "200" I was told about Portugal's American Fund Company in the year of 2004 and facts that it could easily donate sports-related event for "$200Million each" as I had wished in 2004 as well. Later, I reannounced each of these American companies having $600Billion size to wish good lucks to all :
1: Janus Mutual Fund's American Fund Investor company who has a Portagul investor company. (The first year's providing paying company)
2: Amtrak company's American Fund Investor company whose French investor is the famous French Financier company of the British East India company. (The second year's providing paying company)
3: American "Pejoves" Fund who share's the same Spanish Investor company with New York City's Jacob K. Javits Convention Center. (The third year's providing paying company)
4: Lehman Brother's American Fund Investor company who has a French Investor. (The fourth year's providing paying company)
I heard all of these have been my Trust entities' investments since established. All these Trusts I inherited in 2004 were set up by my birth Chinese grandfathers from different generations. The earliest of the above four Trusts I mentioned was set up around the year of 700AD.
I heard most of these "$200Million each" was donated by the investments of those Trust entities I inherited. I heard Mr. David R's clan's investments had donated about $600Million total.
I heard this morning that "600Million already" was expressed annoyingly by Mr. David R's clan in the year of 2004 when I requested it, but I never directed my "$200Million each" request to them nor their relatives nor other rich names, I did not know them nor was told who they are, nor if they would willing to spend on me. Why this clan took my request their expenses?
I heard yesterday's broadcasting that "the Ford Businesses don't have such a monthly $10,000 wired to China story" was said by a Mrs. Jessica R from this clan who is never a Miss Ford. But this "monthly $10,000 wired to China" story was either told or explained on the radio by one of the Ford Businesses' Investor company that Mrs. Jessica R is very certain of. Exactly, what is Mrs. Jessica R implying? By the way, I heard she is the wife of the Mister who had the 1980's Tokyo airport romance with a Chinese.
So, I still don't know what has been the issue impressive as this morning's broadcasting. And, what it implies in the saying of "Why it has to be your money" has alerted me so I have tipped the law people about it.
----July 31st of 2018
07-30-2018 Hong Kong Trust & Where is my money? （香港信托及我的钱在哪？）
Heard this morning's talk about Hong Kong Trust.（听说了今天早上有谈到了香港信托）
My response: (我的回应：）
I haven't been to Hong Kong yet, so I don't know what is the confusion. I just know I inherited my grandfather (my father's father) set up a Trust in Hong Kong that I could request $500Million U.S. dollar to be transferred to the U.S. in 2004. I already published what I heard of after 2004 on this blog already. I have no obligation to explain to whoever is still confused.（我还未去过香港，所以我不清楚究竟是什么就是弄不清还非得弄清楚不可。我就知道2004年时我继承了我爷爷方智仁也就是我父亲方文海的父亲方智仁在香港替我设立的一个信托，我是当时就可以要求这个信托转账5亿美金到美国的。我也已经发表了2004年以后我所听说的一些其他信息。我没有责任义务再多做解释了。）
I haven't been to Hong Kong yet, so I don't know what is the confusion. I just know I inherited my grandfather (my father's father) set up a Trust in Hong Kong that I could request $500Million U.S. dollar to be transferred to the U.S. in 2004. I already published what I heard of after 2004 on this blog already. I have no obligation to explain to whoever is still confused.（我还未去过香港，所以我不清楚究竟是什么就是弄不清还非得弄清楚不可。我就知道2004年时我继承了我爷爷方智仁也就是我父亲方文海的父亲方智仁在香港替我设立的一个信托，我是当时就可以要求这个信托转账5亿美金到美国的。我也已经发表了2004年以后我所听说的一些其他信息。我没有责任义务再多做解释了。）
Regarding why I have no money to spend. Well, I am supposed to be provided for with my envelope girl fantasy which is I will use this envelope's money to spend in this store and that envelope's money in another store, etc. My request in 2004 to use envelopes to manage my monthly providing has become applicable by using a credit card to store "the money in an envelope" as you heard on the radio. Should I contact the legal department of these businesses to inquire? Or wait for the attorneys or law peoples to work their way through?（至于我为什么没钱花的问题。这么说吧，我是应该按照我的小女孩扮家家信封理财的想法领取零花钱的，就是我要从这个信封里拿钱在这家店里花，从那个信封里拿钱在那家店里花。就i象你们那天在广播里所听到的，我在2004年所提的这个要求被我的律师们将“信封里的钱”给放在了信用卡里。我是否应该和这些企业的法务部门联系一下问一问，还是等我的律师或者执法人员处理清楚？）
I have this frustration that I am probably acknowledged as an investor if I go into these businesses, and I know where these businesses are, but nobody in those local locations knows who I should contact to inquire "where is my money?" I heard my entrusting attorneys had spread money all over the places, pharmacies such as Rite Aid, Walgreen, CVS, or possibly supermarket such as Stop and Shop, Roche Brothers, Whole Food, etc. As you have heard my food stamps were announced as should stop on the radio, I have contacted for a $500 monthly food money supposed to be on the food stamps card. So, what am I supposed to do for "enveloped money"? Wait or contact?（我现在有这么一个头疼事：我要是走进一些我的信托所投资的企业，可能有很多人也会相信我有可能是投资人但完全不清楚我应该和谁联系问一下：”我应该从哪儿拿钱？”我听说我的律师真是到处都放了些钱，药店啦(Rite Aid, Walgreen, CVS），可能还有些超市啦(Stop and Shop, Roche Brothers, Whole Food)。据说几个在波城市政府上班的于家人还在广播上强烈宣布就是铁了心的要停了我的政府综援粮食卷。我是已经在联系查询我记忆中应该有放在综援卡里的每月500元的食品钱。所以啊，我就在想啊，我是现在就问一问信封里的钱还是等一等？）
Also, the "enveloped money" arrangement should come with clear instructions from those businesses' lawfully registered investors. But I heard rumors that some businesses already received some messages from this or that person which advised them not to give me "enveloped money" but give to someone else. Should I contact the legal department of these businesses to inquire? Or wait for the attorneys or law peoples to work their way through? （还有，就是“装在信封里的钱”这种安排一定是由这些企业的法律登记上的投资人所明确指示的，但我听说已经有些企业收到了这人那人建议不要把这“装在信封里的钱”给我而是给别人算了。我是否应该和这些企业的法务部门联系一下问一问，还是等我的律师或者执法人员处理清楚？）
Where is my money?（”我的钱在那里？“）
----July 30th, 2018
About Hong Kong Trust.（关于香港信托）
My response: （我的回应：）
1: If not intentional, the best way to explain so many confusion is to simulate setting up a Trust with an attorney to know how I can the be sole beneficiary person specified by the settler's letter before I was born. A Trust is a legal instrument registered to specify who is the beneficiary of this much money given by the Settler.（如果不是故意骚扰，对这个疑问最好的解释方式就是去找个律师模拟一下办理信托的过程，来了解为什么我还没出生就可以成为信托的唯一受益人。信托是一种委托第三方来管理某一笔钱并可以指定谁才是此一笔钱的受益人的法律手段。）
2: Trust entity is an organization that registered in a local government agency, such as the Department of State of NYC. This Trust entity is an organization set up for the purpose of using the money in the Trust to invest.（信托机构是一个向地方政府如纽约市政府等注册成立的机构。成立一个信托机构的目的就是为了用我爷爷所信托的钱来投资。）
3-1: Hong Kong Trust as an example: My grandfather set up a Hong Kong Trust worth $15Million U.S. dollar (5Million DaYang 大洋) with an attorney in1948 and specified who should be the beneficiary person of in his handwriting settler's letter.（香港信托作为例子：我爷爷委托律师用一千五百万美金也就是5百万大洋在1948年时设立了一个信托并在亲笔书写的委托信里制定了谁才是受益人。）
3-2: In order to invest this entrusted $15Million U.S. dollar(5Million DaYang大洋), I heard this attorney later registered a Trust entity with the British Hong Kong government. In 1971, I heard it was this Trust entity had updated its registration record of legal representatives. Cheung Kong Holdings (长江实业), the attorney firm and the accounting firm are the business associations of this Trust entity. This Trust entity has been 100% privately owned by the Hong Kong Trust which was set up in 1948 by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren(方智仁). I am the settler and sole beneficiary person of the Hong Kong Trust since 2004.（为了用这笔一千五百万美金即五百万的大洋来投资，我听说这个律师就向当时的英国香港政府注册了一家金融机构。我听说就是这家金融机构在1971年更改了登记记录增加了一个法人代表。长江实业，律师公司及会计师公司都是这家金融机构的业务往来。这家金融机构是100%由我爷爷1948年设立的香港信托拥有，自2004年7月起，我是这个香港信托的委托人及唯一的受益人。）
----published on July 29th, 2018
这已经是有意识地在骚扰了。谁是幕后人物？明明是中国司法部，美国司法部都已经澄清了没有任何会让中国公民可以号称很困扰的钱。我是我爷爷方智仁1948年所设立的香港信托的唯一受益人，我所宣称的其他信托也都是只有一个受益人的信托。没有任何理会需要由中国政府来撑腰让任何中国人为我宣称有钱如此莫名其妙的愤怒。我既不吃中国国库的钱，也没逼着任何一个中国公民给我寄钱买饭吃，哪来的这份需要煽动这份莫名其妙的仇恨？我说我有钱让谁的日子过不下去了？
----published on July 29th, 2018
Also, the "enveloped money" arrangement should come with clear instructions from those businesses' lawfully registered investors. But I heard rumors that some businesses already received some messages from this or that person which advised them not to give me "enveloped money" but give to someone else. Should I contact the legal department of these businesses to inquire? Or wait for the attorneys or law peoples to work their way through? （还有，就是“装在信封里的钱”这种安排一定是由这些企业的法律登记上的投资人所明确指示的，但我听说已经有些企业收到了这人那人建议不要把这“装在信封里的钱”给我而是给别人算了。我是否应该和这些企业的法务部门联系一下问一问，还是等我的律师或者执法人员处理清楚？）
Where is my money?（”我的钱在那里？“）
----July 30th, 2018
About Hong Kong Trust.（关于香港信托）
My response: （我的回应：）
1: If not intentional, the best way to explain so many confusion is to simulate setting up a Trust with an attorney to know how I can the be sole beneficiary person specified by the settler's letter before I was born. A Trust is a legal instrument registered to specify who is the beneficiary of this much money given by the Settler.（如果不是故意骚扰，对这个疑问最好的解释方式就是去找个律师模拟一下办理信托的过程，来了解为什么我还没出生就可以成为信托的唯一受益人。信托是一种委托第三方来管理某一笔钱并可以指定谁才是此一笔钱的受益人的法律手段。）
2: Trust entity is an organization that registered in a local government agency, such as the Department of State of NYC. This Trust entity is an organization set up for the purpose of using the money in the Trust to invest.（信托机构是一个向地方政府如纽约市政府等注册成立的机构。成立一个信托机构的目的就是为了用我爷爷所信托的钱来投资。）
3-1: Hong Kong Trust as an example: My grandfather set up a Hong Kong Trust worth $15Million U.S. dollar (5Million DaYang 大洋) with an attorney in1948 and specified who should be the beneficiary person of in his handwriting settler's letter.（香港信托作为例子：我爷爷委托律师用一千五百万美金也就是5百万大洋在1948年时设立了一个信托并在亲笔书写的委托信里制定了谁才是受益人。）
3-2: In order to invest this entrusted $15Million U.S. dollar(5Million DaYang大洋), I heard this attorney later registered a Trust entity with the British Hong Kong government. In 1971, I heard it was this Trust entity had updated its registration record of legal representatives. Cheung Kong Holdings (长江实业), the attorney firm and the accounting firm are the business associations of this Trust entity. This Trust entity has been 100% privately owned by the Hong Kong Trust which was set up in 1948 by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren(方智仁). I am the settler and sole beneficiary person of the Hong Kong Trust since 2004.（为了用这笔一千五百万美金即五百万的大洋来投资，我听说这个律师就向当时的英国香港政府注册了一家金融机构。我听说就是这家金融机构在1971年更改了登记记录增加了一个法人代表。长江实业，律师公司及会计师公司都是这家金融机构的业务往来。这家金融机构是100%由我爷爷1948年设立的香港信托拥有，自2004年7月起，我是这个香港信托的委托人及唯一的受益人。）
----published on July 29th, 2018
这已经是有意识地在骚扰了。谁是幕后人物？明明是中国司法部，美国司法部都已经澄清了没有任何会让中国公民可以号称很困扰的钱。我是我爷爷方智仁1948年所设立的香港信托的唯一受益人，我所宣称的其他信托也都是只有一个受益人的信托。没有任何理会需要由中国政府来撑腰让任何中国人为我宣称有钱如此莫名其妙的愤怒。我既不吃中国国库的钱，也没逼着任何一个中国公民给我寄钱买饭吃，哪来的这份需要煽动这份莫名其妙的仇恨？我说我有钱让谁的日子过不下去了？
----published on July 29th, 2018
07-29-2018 The cold emotion && 什么是公厕门外一元？
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the emotions.
My response:
Janus mutual fund has been an investment from the four American companies I have claimed that had provided for me. Because the first year's and second year's companies' related confusion have been clarified. So, this possibly is some joint confused area of the third and fourth year's Amercian companies.
I had this cold feeling when I was still in Janus Associates in 2003-2004. Before that, I was just someone would come at 8:30 and leave at 5PM or so who could sit in front a computer alone all day long, an absolute outsider in any social chat among staffs. And this spinning up and spinning out feeling, I was only an element in the center, not any kind of power source, that I need to keep some balance in the entire process. The research director was ousted in October of 2003 when I was in Boston, MA, so I don't know what had happened. I relocated back to Connecticut, after only two months moving up to Boston of Massachusetts that I had insisted on. I had complained about my exhausted health situation in January of 2004's inheriting related birth-identification verification meeting, I was asked to leave a month later. I survived.
----July 29th, 2018
About Hong Kong Trust.（关于香港信托）
My response: （我的回应：）
1: If not intentional, the best way to explain so many confusion is to simulate setting up a Trust with an attorney to know how I can the sole beneficiary person specified by the settler's letter before I was born. A Trust is a legal instrument registered to specify who is the beneficiary of this much money given by the Settler.（如果不是故意骚扰，对这个疑问最好的解释方式就是去找个律师模拟一下办理信托的过程，来了解为什么我还没出生就可以成为信托的唯一受益人。信托是一种委托第三方来管理某一笔钱并可以指定谁才是此一笔钱的受益人的法律手段。）
2: Trust entity is an organization that registered in a local government agency, such as the Department of State of NYC. This Trust entity is an organization set up for the purpose of using the money in the Trust to invest.（信托机构是一个向地方政府如纽约市政府等注册成立的机构。成立一个信托机构的目的就是为了用我爷爷所信托的钱来投资。）
3-1: Hong Kong Trust as an example: My grandfather set up a Hong Kong Trust worth $15Million U.S. dollar (5Million DaYang 大洋) with an attorney in1948 and specified who should be the beneficiary person of in his handwriting settler's letter.（香港信托作为例子：我爷爷委托律师用一千五百万美金也就是5百万大洋在1948年时设立了一个信托并在亲笔书写的委托信里制定了谁才是受益人。）
3-2: In order to invest this entrusted $15Million U.S. dollar(5Million DaYang大洋), I heard this attorney later registered a Trust entity with the British Hong Kong government. In 1971, I heard it was this Trust entity had updated its registration record of legal representatives. Cheung Kong Holdings (长江实业), the attorney firm and the accounting firm are the business associations of this Trust entity. This Trust entity has been 100% privately owned by the Hong Kong Trust which was set up in 1948 by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren(方智仁). I am the settler and sole beneficiary person of the Hong Kong Trust since 2004.（为了用这笔一千五百万美金即五百万的大洋来投资，我听说这个律师就向当时的英国香港政府注册了一家金融机构。我听说就是这家金融机构在1971年更改了登记记录增加了一个法人代表。长江实业，律师公司及会计师公司都是这家金融机构的业务往来。这家金融机构是100%由我爷爷1948年设立的香港信托拥有，自2004年7月起，我是这个香港信托的委托人及唯一的受益人。）
----July 29th, 2018
据说是华国锋的长子在南京的鼓楼广场那儿的公共厕所外面在陈x肚子里下的种。
我的回应：
我是听说了，不止一次地下种努力，一块钱一次的下种机会，估计就是要趁着还是独生子女政策，就是要让陈x的丈夫断子绝孙的努力。
如果是真的，那是婚姻自由，只要陈x的丈夫自己乐意断子绝孙就得。我说华国锋这个婊子养的狗杂种生的是个狗屎没人要的烂货儿子，理由如下：
- 据说他是军人，虽然没有计划生育，但老婆生的四个都不是他下的种。
- 据说中国的价值观就是女人屁股才是天王老子，讲究的就是一分价钱一分货，他下的着种的女人屁股原来是个公共厕所门外的屁股，就只值人民币一元一次。
- 别人的女儿都叫千金，他那个女儿抱在怀里是个公厕门外一元。
我就只认得我自己的亲爹亲妈。
----2018年7月29日。
听说了今天早上又来愤怒质问为什么是我的钱。
我的回应：
这已经是有意识地在骚扰了。谁是幕后人物？明明是中国司法部，美国司法部都已经澄清了没有任何会让中国公民可以号称很困扰的钱。我是我爷爷方智仁1948年所设立的香港信托的唯一受益人，我所宣称的其他信托也都是只有一个受益人的信托。没有任何理会需要由中国政府来撑腰让任何中国为我宣称有钱如此莫名其妙的愤怒。我既不吃中国国库的钱，也没逼着任何一个中国公民给我寄钱买饭吃，哪来的这份需要煽动这份莫名其妙的仇恨？我说我有钱让谁的日子过不下去了？
能够想象，我说以下的话会引发一些愤怒：比如说：我说这中国现任国家领导人习近平李克强不过是个婊子养的吃剩饭的货才会需要以性交成果性交能力为骄傲，才会认为他们肯吃的奶子就是可以领导中国13亿人民的实力，也就是说，别说是中国的13亿人民，就是全世界的44亿人民，都不可能不馋那国髀奶子的滋味而俯首帖耳的啊，就不可能不知道有生育能力就够资格违反国家计划生意政策，要是再多生了几个孩子让民政局养着，那才是真真实实明明确确对中国13亿人民最大的贡献了。听说都已经是雄心壮志绝对乐意靠国髀一个人的子宫就可以让中国人口力争上看14亿了，再多花点国库的钱，再让13亿普通老百姓的孩子没饭吃没衣穿饿死饿绝了拉到，那对中国人民的贡献得有多大啊，等等。据说国髀大家庭威胁恐吓的希望我可以尊重国髀，可我身上又没长个吊，有什么需要来尊重这些国家领导人也就只有性交能力可以骄傲展示的事实，或者也就只有够资格舔舔剩饭否则就得断子绝孙的成果可以满世界宣布招摇的本事?
中国13亿人民会说这种说法就算中肯善意，确实是全心全意为了中国13亿人民的福祉，那也实在是难听，能不能换个方式说，对吧？换个方式来说？方家大小姐我目前可没这打算。我现在是在说我自己有钱，又不是在说就只有猪狗才会去操你们的国髀屁股之类的，需要中国的国家领导人带领13亿人民都为你们的国髀没钱而愤怒吗？那就把中国人民的国库送给你们的国髀以表达你们13亿中国人民对你们国髀的热爱吗？有需要飞跃重洋跑来美国来表达你们中国人民对你们中国的国髀没有中国国库的钱可以自由随便花的那份愤怒吗？中国国库就在中国，不过中国人民可是自1949年就已经站起来了，到了1990年代就已经全国万众一心组成新的长城了，怪道不远万里对我吼个不停。我在美国二十年日子过的好好，冷不丁一片混乱，却原来是天上掉下来了一个来自中华人民共和国的抢钱一族。
----2018年7月29日。
07-28-2018 This morning's broadcasting of a public robbery scene in reality.
I heard it was another extortion radio show full of threats and bilking for Mr. Albert Gore's beloved this or that person's deservedness to have some money. I heard the money was given as demanded as you heard on the radio, so I contacted law people through a law website.
I refuse to be a victim of a public robbery as such, it is astonishing how they dare to conduct such public extortion, not to mention using public media to perform such public microphone armed robbery.
I don't understand why Albert Gore can have such power after all these years to be so superior above U.S laws without a public office's privilege?
I often joked why would any accountant willing to steal money for someone else in order to keep only a fraction? All the criminal charges will be this accountant's alone, for only a fraction?
Why would all these producers willing to let the possible criminal investigation open for themselves but watching other people getting cash by just speaking to the microphone they are employed to operate? All possible charges against abusive use of the public media will be against these producers as well as the radio company, while they are concerned about their own income and watch those speakers spending the cash, that is if the prominent American riches are willing to pay for all the financial losses to the victims of this radio program's such scheme. Who are these so smart producers?
Also, why this radio company rather file bankruptcy but refuses to fire those who are the reasons for this public scheme?
The public audiences don't need to be taught such a lesson that anyone's money can be taken against their own wishes publicly in the United States with all the U.S. law people watching.
Those businesses don't need this public exposure as if they can steal investors' money so publicly and so easily.
I don't need them to reveal how much money I am supposed to be provided for, it is none of the public audiences' business.
I refuse to be the excuse for this kind of public robbery scene in reality.
I was asked if I am "a farm animal raised to be slaughtered for meat" by the Chinese government, I say I am lucky I am a U.S. citizen now. But I don't know how many former Chinese citizens are also "raised to be slaughtered for meat" worldwide, and I don't know if this is a popular trend in the United States somewhere, but seems not a trend popular in the U.S. government sector.
----July 28th, 2018
07-27-2018 Wealth under entrusting means hellish anxiety（一旦财产信托，真是苦不堪言）
Now it's imaginable what makes me scream in my apartment that I need $6Million cash in my backpack daily so I can be anxiety-free for 50 years. I was comforted it is expected as such for any wealth under-entrusting case.
I am already so much better, my entrusting attorneys possibly not only spread money all over places as a routine practice but also put me into the welfare system. I haven't received any money other than the welfare help in my daily living.
Then, why entrust? The wealth itself can be under great protection if the owner can't take care of the wealth for some reason.
I heard it is obvious that Yu's offspring in Hong Kong and Boston haven't followed their family teaching yet. After yesterday, I would assume it is the Hong Kong Trust possibly under pressure. It seems like Yu’s has been a historically well-known family in China.
（现在可以想象我为什么扯着嗓门的要求，我收到钱就要放六百万美金随身带，足够50年不用担心下个月有没有生活费了。据说一旦办理财产信托，就得准备过这种日子。
我的情况真是已经很好了，我的信托律师估计除了照信托行业的常规到处放点钱看我能不能收到之外，还把我给放进了社服救济综援系统。生活费用给付？我至今除了综援就什么钱都没有收到。
那为什么还要办理信托啊？如果因为什么原因造成自己不能照看财富，办理信托可以让财富得到最大程度的保护和保障。
老爸爸：现在已经已经越来越好了，还是要把现金扣紧。
妈妈：希望你还在，希望你很好，也是要把钱扣紧，身边稍微放点现金。只要你照顾好自己，老爸爸和我能够照顾好自己。
听说今天早上很明显，香港和波士顿的于家后裔还不需要追随于家家训。在昨天的澄清之后，我估计是我爷爷替我设立的香港信托压力很大。看样子，于家在中国估计是有点历史名气的。）
----July 27th, 2018
07-26-2018 Are Yu-s actually Li, Zicheng's offspring? (于家是不是闯王李自成的后裔啊？）
Heard this frustration of "why Min Fang can have morning by post ownership on the web"（听说了有关”为什么方敏就可以在网上宣布宣布就可以有这钱那钱“的气愤.
My response:（我的回应：）
If I respond harshly, I would ask do you ever have an IQ evaluated? The explanation: why don't you repeat your supporting analysis why you say so?（粗鲁版本的回应：你有没有一丁点的智商啊？解释：你自己重复一下你自己刚才说的愤怒理由及你自己的分析？）
The politer way to respond: I posted on the internet web in 2017-2018 stating I received this much money paid in October of 2014, October of 2015, October 2016, and October 2017 from these companies, you also have heard all have been confirmed as the true and lawfully instructed payment by the paying companies. What is wrong with your logic to say I claim to own knowing the truth is I
just announced what I have received or I am expecting to receive?（客气一点的版本：我是在2017年-2018年期间在网上公布我是在2014年10月，2015年10月，2016年10月，2017年10月分别受到了这些公司所支付的这些款项，你们也都听到这些公司出面证实我所言属实且这些支付都是按上级公司指示合法支付。你们逻辑有问题才会如此颠倒。明明是我在网上宣布我已经收到钱，你们就给颠倒成我是在宣布我想要这些钱？）
The correct statement is "Min Fang announced what she has received or been expecting to receive on the web."（正确的说法应该是“方敏在网上宣布了所收到的钱以及还在等着收的钱。”）
----July 26th, 2018
Heard this morning's Yu's tough attitude of "give us the money" and declaring of relative- relationship.（听说了今天早上于家的强硬立场“给偶们拿钱来”以及所宣布的“统统都是亲戚”)。
My response:（我的回应：）
This reminds me of one historic name in China: "Li, Zicheng (闯王李自成)", a historically famous gang people. （这倒是让我想起了中国的一个历史人物的名字”闯王李自成，中国历史上很有名的一个占山为王的帮派头子。）
In English tales, Robin Hood enjoyed rob rich person to help poor and in-need, this infamous Li, Zicheng (李自成)'s name in Chinese tales were different, this Li, Zicheng (李自成)'s name never means helps in-needs but deserve to own by themselves in Chinese tales.（在英语故事里，罗宾汉是打家劫舍乐于助人救难的豪侠，这个闯王李自成的名字在中国的传说里不是这样的，闯王李自成的名子不是打劫为了救难而是就是应该全归他们自己所有。）
What makes this name famous in Chinese tales was how they grouped as a gang, the talent told in all Chinese tales has been "how to create relatives without blood association", now, what you heard this morning may be the presentation from the offspring.（这个名字在中国民间故事里很出名的是他们是如何结帮成伙的。所有的中国民间故事都是在讲闯王李自成是如何的有了”一百零八将”的结拜兄弟姊妹. 你们今天早上听到的可能就是这个闯王李自成的后裔所做的李自成后裔家族的“才华展示会”。)
All these Yu-s may be the offspring of this famous Li, Zicheng (闯王李自成) is definitely my speculation at this minute of today. I am positive it can be confirmed.（我猜测所有这些于姓人士可能都是闯王李自成的后裔，但我还真是很自信这猜测估计是可以被证实的。）
WIkipedia----Li_Zicheng
维基----闯王李自成
----July 26th, 2018
Heard this morning's saying of "thousands" and "give up".（听说了今天早上的“加个千”以及“放弃了”）
My response: Yes, I heard. (我的回应：是啊，我听说了)。
----July 26th, 2018
07-25-2018 Why a radio program can be so all mighty powerful beyond entertainment
Heard this morning's talk of the "since 2007 marriage".
My response:
I heard this has been no secret in the U.S. entertainment industry since 2007. I heard it was late Mr. David Rockefeller took Mister out of his personal life situation which I 100% have no problem at all, but I don't know if against his wish or as he wishes. I do think late Mr. David Rockefeller would be very great on this matter if it was as that Mister had wished.
I have nothing to do with this Mister has been a true statement.
----July 25th, 2018
Regarding why a radio program can be so all mighty powerful beyond entertainment?
My response:
I heard a majority of China's Central Political Committee's members married to a Chinese entertainment personnel. Tons of practicing power in this radio program producing and promoting that anyone can imagine.
I heard the Rockefeller's name has been the "Rock and Roll" powerhouse in the U.S. business world through this radio program's producing and promoting, and it is all about my matters should be their deservedness to meddle. It has been all about "I said so, Don't I deserve so, What do you mean it is not my privilege..." on the radio about matters that one would not consider their matters or not their privileges or not their deservedness in the United States or by the United States laws.
In Boston of Massachusetts, Boston Mayor Marty Walsh has been rumored the reason of all these on-street and in-reality promoting whatever was announced on the radio except for such "unpleasant" announcements as "Min Fang's inheriting in 2004 was legally valid" by the U.S. Justice Department, or "Min Fang has money" from the U.S. business, etc., all from the same radio program which he has been supporting.
I have sent two emails to Boston Mayor's office already, one is about my possible intellectual income which had already paid handsome Massachusetts Income tax, taxes were not paid in my name because of some of this radio program's announcements but definitely my earning's taxes. The other one is about my Hong Kong trust entity I inherited which has been announced on the same radio program. I don't know why Boston city has such huge problems to help me with food and cash via its welfare system. In the United States, I don't pay any income tax to a city by the U.S. laws.
Other than myself, who else would be impacted because of all these orchestrated efforts of producing & promoting this radio program as such? Well, there was some rumor that can ask this question the most illustrative.
If a government official in-office who has a personal interest in my inheriting story is willing to give an "administrative order from this person's office" if an administrative order can be given by any public office, and the order is to order police officer to open fire at me on the street to "prevent disappointment from those who want some money".
By the U.S. Constitution, by the U.S. government administrative related laws and by all U.S. federal or state laws, U.S. government official can't give such administrative order as "open fire to a civilian who does not carry firearms". So, what will happen if some police officers willing to carry out such administrative order from a valid public office, and some police officers disagree that can be a valid administrative order at all from any valid public office?
In case not everybody knows how the police system works in the United States, it means the possible complete shootout among police officers which may lead to a nationwide shootout. No police officer can be excluded. On this matter, there is no conflict at all among any Federal laws, state laws or city laws in the entire United States.
If one police officer willing to execute the administrative order to kill a no-firearm-civilian on a U.S. street, another police officer who is enforcing U.S. laws has to open fire at the killer-police, both will call out to their supporting police officers for help, the situation will be, I use Boston as a local street's city to demonstrate here: if all Boston police officers have called in but can't make the situation clear, nearby cities police officers will be called together with Massachusetts state-police officers, further will be Connecticut's and New Hampshire's, etc, till the situation is clear.
As a lot would assume, I will be the one killed anyway in this process but it won't stop the shoot-out till the killer-police willing to be arrested. And I am comfortable I possibly will be able to escape the shooting 100% by my own help miraculously once the shooting started.
So, exactly, what I am trying to illustrate here?
----July 25th, 2018
07-24-2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the NO FOOD threatening situation.
My response: I also heard the argument about how government agencies coordinate their jobs together. As I said, I am quiet because it is obvious that I am already protected by laws.
----July 24th, 2018
07-23-2018 How many more confusions are still out there? （现在还有多少困扰没弄清啊？）
Heard a lot of people saying I am quiet now means I am done which is an untrue statement.（有人说我现在没声是不是差不多了, 我说当然不是了）
My response:（我的回应：）
I refuse all these demands for my money. （我拒绝所有这些向我索要钱财的要求。）
My gifting is voluntary to who I call relatives, never debt owed to Fang's any offspring. If the six relatives families, which are families of my father's two sisters and one brother, my grandfather one sister and one brother, dislike the gifting size, I am willing to cancel the gifting entirely to convince everyone that I never owe. I withhold the gift to my younger brother because he seems never a relative to me nor my parents. I refuse to gift anyone else. I consider futher request on this matter as extortion.（送礼物是自愿给被我称为亲戚的几个，从来不是因为欠了方家后人的钱债.。2004年我愿意送礼的六家+1家被我称为亲戚的人家，也就是我父亲的一弟两妹家里，我爷爷的一弟一妹家里，以及我奶奶的娘家兄弟家里，如果这些人认为我送的礼物规模不满意，我愿意将送礼物计划全部取消以平息所有人的不平衡并证明我方敏确实从来没有欠债必须要还的情况。所有就此的动作多多我都认为是在试图敲诈勒索。我暂时不会送给我弟弟任何礼物就因为他好像从来就不是我或者我父母的一个亲戚，我也拒绝送礼物给任何其他人。）
Not really I am done but it is obvious that I have been protected by laws is the reason I am quiet now.（不是因为我差不多了而是已经很明显我是被法律保护着，所以我没声了。）
I have announced four big company that two of which have been clarified that their paid-out money is lawfully for my exclusive usage. The current one is in the processing of clarifying what the confusions are that having doubts if the paid-out from this company should be for my exclusive usage. I haven't received the providing-payment from the clarified two companies is because the huge radio campaign of "taking the money out of Min Fang's possession to the truly deserved even if it means illegally" since 2013 has been the co-efforts from this currently in-clarification-confusions' group who may have also impacted my life severely. The other efforts are from the "what intellectual income should be" confusion.（我宣布过有4个公司为我支付生活费用，其中两个公司的支付款项已经得到澄清确实是合法提供给我方敏一个人使用的，现在进行的是有关第三家公司支付款项困扰的澄清。我现在还未收到前面两家公司的支付款项就是因为从2013年起的广播剧“就算手段非法也要把钱从方敏那儿拿走交给够资格有钱的人”这么一个宣传就是很多围绕这家公司的困扰造成也造成了我日常生活的不安全感以及很多真实的不便。广播剧这个宣传制作努力的其他努力方则是因为“什么是智慧产权”的困扰。）
I heard this current confusion from Yu's families （于家）has been historical since my great-great-grandfather's family inheriting in 1910 or so. I heard Yu's family had a bank that denied a banknote of 70,000 Silver dollars deposit which was $70,000 U.S. dollar in 1910 when the exchange rate was 1Silver Dollar = $ 1 U.S. dollar. The reason for the denial given was it might be a forged banknote which was unlikely because this deposit banknote was given to the banker Yu's own close in-law as part of the son's share from my great-great-grandfather's family-wealth inheriting, all other bank deposit notes from my deceased great-great-grandfather to all his adult sons and all his wives were good, all his junior sons' trusts were all good as well. This son's share and the average family inheriting size were both 100,000 Silver Dollars each and this son's blood was never doubted. Each son's share was decided by the father. I heard this was not the only story rumored about this bank operated by Yu's family since 1910. This story does remind me of what was announced on this radio program about an NYC bank branch's functions. This son's son burned my grandfather's house once because of the confusion if it was my great-grandfather forged his father's banknote which was untrue. The Trust my grandfather set up in 1948 was $500 Silver Dollars.（我听说现在这个于家的困扰好像有历史了，从我曽曾祖父那代分家产就有。我听说1910年左右有个开银行的于家拒绝兑现我曽曾祖父一个儿子的一张七万大洋的银票，这张1910年7万大洋的银票就是美国1910年时期的七万美元， 据说给的理由是银票可能是假的，我估计不太可能因为这张是这个儿子所分家产的一部分，这张于家银行的银票就是给这个于家银行老板的姻亲的，关系很近，我曽曾祖父给他所有成年儿子及所有老婆的其他银票都是好的，给所有年幼儿子们办的信托也都没问题。那一代每一个儿子的平均份额是十万大洋，这个儿子分到的就是十万大洋而且这个儿子的血脉也从未被做父亲的怀疑过。每个儿子的份额多少都是由做父亲的决定。我听说从这1910年起这于家银行还有一些类似的故事。这还真让我想起了广播剧上所宣布的纽约城里的一个银行分行的职责应该是什么。就是这家的儿子还是孙子把我爷爷的房子给烧过一次，就是因为他们家怀疑是我曾祖父篡改了那张银票。 我曾祖父从未碰过那张银票。我爷爷1948年设立的信托是500万大洋的信托。）
The confusion from this Yu's family with my inherited seems because of my great-grandmother's last name had the same pronunciation Chinese character of Yu as well. We are definitely not related.（据说现在于家对我继承的困扰就是因为我曾祖母娘家姓氏也是于姓的同音字，但我们之间肯定没有亲戚关系。）
----July 23rd, 2018
The expansion of the new system did not lead to the extinction of the old: the growth of deposit-taking, combined with less stringent capital requirements, convinced many state bankers that they could do without either the ability to issue banknotes or a federal charter, and led to a resurgence of state banking in the 1880s and 1890s. Under the original acts, the minimum capital requirement for national banks was $50,000 for banks in towns with a population of 6000 or less, $100,000 for banks in cities with a population ranging from 6000 to 50,000, and $200,000 for banks in cities with populations exceeding 50,000. By contrast, the minimum capital requirement for a state bank was often as low as $10,000. The difference in capital requirements may have been an important difference in the resurgence of state banking: in 1877 only about one-fifth of state banks had a capital of less than $50,000; by 1899 the proportion was over three-fifths. Recognizing this competition, the Gold Standard Act of 1900 reduced the minimum capital necessary for national banks.
(这一段是说1900年左右在人口6000以下的城市开一家银行只需要5万美金的现金储备，如果是6000到5万人口的城市就需要10万美金的储备金）
(US Banking History, Civil War to World War II. Source: https://eh.net/encyclopedia/us-banking-history-civil-war-to-world-war-ii/)
方家后人可以考虑查询司法界人士及律师究竟什么才是方家后人他们自己的合法权益，甚至可以考虑设立或者模拟设立一份信托来了解什么是信托继承。如果是方家后人的法律权益，就应该可以查询到究竟是什么法律权益以及究竟由哪条法律条款所赋予或者所保障，所以请方家亲戚自己查询自己的合法权益究竟是什么之后，以及方家亲眷的合法权益究竟有没有被方敏所侵占之后，方家亲眷自然可以决定如何处理。我方敏确实不愿意被骚扰，我方敏确实没有拿方家亲眷的钱财，我方敏确实没有欠方家亲眷钱财，我方敏希望方家亲眷可以在确定我方敏没有侵占方家亲眷法律权益之后， 在方家亲眷情绪平静愿意尊重我方敏的合法权益之后，如有需要再联络我方敏。（Fang's offspring can consider consulting legal or justice professionals about exactly what their lawful rights & interests are, or to consider to set up a Trust entity or simulate to set up one to know exactly what Trust-Inheriting is. If there are indeed some Fang's offspring's lawful right & interest, then exactly by which law item granted or to protect should be able to be confirmed by legal professional's help, I ask Fang's relatives to please consult all these out themselves and to make their own decisions accordingly afterward. I never took any Fang's offspring's any money, nor owe them any money. I am not comfortable to be harassed. I wish Fang's relatives to decide if they want to contact me after they have confirmed their own lawful right& interests have not been impacted by my inheriting, and comfortable enough as well to respect my lawful rights & interests.)
方家每代都是在父辈去世时分家产，由继承人继承门户，其他后人则自立门户。只要你家是方家血脉，你家前辈就应该在其父辈去世分家自立门户时分到过方家的家产。如果你家从没分过方家的家产，你家从来就不是方家血脉。我爷爷兄妹是在1930年我曾祖父去世时分的家，我父亲兄妹是在1965年我爷爷去世时分的家，我相信我父亲目前是失踪。我于2004年继承我爷爷所设立信托继承我爷爷这支的方家。（Family inheriting in Fang's house happened when each generation's father passed away. If your family are Fang's offspring, your family should already have experienced the family inheriting when your family became an independent house while my grandfather inherited the deceased father's house as the heir. if your family never inherited anything from Fang's house, that is because you are never the Fang's offspring. My grandfather's siblings had family inheriting in 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away, my father's siblings had family inheriting in 1965 when my grandfather passed away. I believe my father currently is missing. I inherited my grandfather's house in 2004 after my Trust-Inheriting.)
07-22-2018 Missy O, you are a cheap-born yourself to watch your husband to father other woman's children.
Heard this morning's talk about so not allowed.
My response:
Pretty much everything is not allowed. "Not allowed to have food", "Not allowed to have a roof", "Not allowed to talk", "not allowed to have children", "Not allowed to have parents still alive" from different over-outreaching groups but well-organized care-free insisted on. Over-outreaching groups mean none of these groups would be the group should have expected any impacted interests if allowed. I accused this is the murder-attempted by all the participants.
I had met some big names interesting but only one from each name. Why this can be so confusing after all these years, 14 years later to be exactly? Are they psychos?
Two example: One is Miss Jessica O's husband who might be a cousin of the person I met but both have the anxiety as if I am the one so confused, or he is the same person but he had already moved on before my birth children were conceived which means he never donated his bio to have my biological children to be born.
The entire time, I have been trying to tell this Miss O if her child was born in the same 2010 as my children, my children won't be the children sharing the blood because O's name is never cheap, she just insisted on she is a cheap-born enough to be so confused. So I used her insisted-on as today's title.
I have made it very clear my daughter presented in a video in 2012 resembles me. If Miss O has been a wife to her husband this entire time, how come she never knew she is this cheap to watch her husband kept having children with others? I was never this cheap to need his money to raise none of his bio children.
So, I really want to ask this Miss O, have you participated in some too wild parties to be confused this much to mistake every JoyStick a husband to yourself? If you are this cheap as yourself demonstrated so publicly, why you fancy you can forbid me to acknowledge my biological children are so realistic children to deserve to live their life proudly? I am so proud to tell you I am much wealthy than your husband to provide for my biological children.
07-22-2018 Missy O, you are a cheap-born yourself to watch your husband to father other woman's children. Otherwise, you should realize you only have one husband instead of claiming every boy who has a joyful stick a husband.
I am so proud to tell Miss O that I am so much wealthier than your husband to provide much handsomely for my biological children.
The other one is a Mister D. R. who I never met but somehow so confused why I so stuck with him.
Can anyone tell me what is wrong with them?
I heard D.R's family had invested some movies and shows I wanted to invest in 2004, but the intellectual income I earned in front of so many people was the expense before the company tax which was nothing to do with him. I heard he is the person kept telling everybody I have no money, why it is him if he was there heard everything I wanted was answered by the none Rockefellers, nor Fords, and nor Waltons, except those investment opportunities his family so willing to grab the chance to invest? Is the Missy O couple the same story?
The intellectual Income has nothing to do with the investment profit that they have already received. The intellectual income is paid as the administrative expenses but calculated as the percentage of the sales which is similar to the salesperson's incentive.
* I can sense there are some Chinese female psychos competing who kept claiming every JoyStick from the F house is the JoyStick for them to handle. I don't know if they are from the prostituting pimping efforts.
----July 22nd, 2018
07-21-2018 Why Chinese Communities have this Anger Outburst?（华裔社区爆发的愤怒究竟是什么？）
Heard this morning's talk of Chinese communities outburst yesterday.（听说了今天早上华裔社区对我昨天博文的愤怒）
My response:（我的回应：）
Why? Who deserves what saying? Laws printed in Chinese, in English, in French, In Spanish for them to check out, why they only demand mouth-privilege for the saying? Who expects what saying from what opening located at where on a human body if laws-in-prints are not what expected to provide the saying? (为什么？谁应该有个什么说法？可查询的已经发表的已实施法律，既有用中文发表的，也有用英文法文西班牙文发表的，为什么不查询这些已发表已实施法律而强调这张嘴那张嘴才能给个说法？如果已发表法律的说法不是所期望的，那人体哪个部分的什么开口部位才是所应该期望的给个说法的权威？）
Use this "Not allowed to talk, not allowed to have a roof, not allowed to have food" tone to disagree with my accusation against the Chinese government is never the privilege granted by the Constitution to any government officials not to mention these government employees who possibly intentionally seeking jobs in Boston after my inheriting in 2004. (用这种”不准说话，不准有屋住，不准有饭吃“的口气来表达对我指责中国政府的态度，从来就不是美国宪法赋予美国政府官员的特权，更不用说他们就只是在政府机关找了份工作的替政府做工的雇员而已，我还怀疑他们是不是在我2004年继承之后特意在麻州波士顿政府部门找这份工来伺机做他们现在表态铁了心就是要做的事？他们都是姓于的，这是偶然吗？）
As you heard so loudly, the Intellectual incomes should be recognized as the reward to those what located between human legs is the reason there is actually so many confusion how could an intellectual-maker deserve the intellectual-making while so many paired-openings so want it?（就像你所听到的响亮宣言，智慧产权应该被认为是奖励人体两腿中间部位的功能的，所以才会有这么多的奇怪声音来强调明明有这么多已经对接在一起的人体想要钱，凭什么让智慧产权的创造者拿智慧收入？
Are all these outbursts the same?（这些华裔社区的愤怒也是一类吗？）
My anger regarding Chinese communities, especially Boston Chinese community, is that they are so certain that I never get a penny from this or that prominent JoyStick because I was homeless and am currently on welfare. All you could hear from the Chinese communities is the anger from the pride as if themselves are the authentic sucker expected to have money instead of being the none of their business group. Otherwise, why Chinese attitudes or Chinese determinations are needed when there are existing government's regulations or the U.S. laws to handle my welfare case? Especially when none of these state-government employees from the Boston Chinese community is my welfare caseworker.（我对于华裔社区特别是波士顿华裔社区的愤怒就是：他们很清楚我曾经是流落街头现在靠政府综援生活，从没从这条那条男人乐呵棍拿一分钱。而你们可以听到的华裔社区那份因骄傲而产生的愤怒就好像他们才是真正舔到了这条那条男人乐呵棍的够资格拿钱的人物，而不是这和他们有什么关系这么一族。否则的话，明明美国政府机关已经有完善法规条例管理综援的情况下，哪里会需要这份华裔态度，华裔决心？何况，这些波士顿华裔人士根本就不是我的什么综援申请审批相关人士。）
I am already in communication with the Massachusetts and Boston government agencies about my welfare case as what I suppose to do according to the U.S. laws. According to I hear, everyone whose wealth under-entrust is expected the same as I am experiencing: I am constantly facing the eviction anxiety, monthly providing-check recipients have the anxiety of what if no check comes-in next month? So, I screamed at my apartment I need $6Million cash in my backpack to be anxiety free for 50 years.（我已经根据美国法律做了我应该做的，也就是和麻州及波士顿的政府相关机构就我的综援进行沟通查询。我听说啊，每一个办了财产信托的人都会有我这份体会：我是天天担心被赶出综援系统，每月拿生活费支票的那种就天天担心下个月支票没来怎么办？所以，我是急得在我家里乱吼：我要六百万美元现金放在随身包里，这样我就可以50年不用担惊受怕。）
Why in my backpack? That is because I have another anxiety of "Heavens above, Hells underneath, The proud Chinese communities are in-between." The explanation: If I dare to have a house or a bank account, air strikes should be expected from above, landmines and tunnels underneath, the proud Chinese communities are all around to break-in. So, I analyzed to conclude my high-tech security should be what I rely on to protect my life and my $6Million cash.（为什么放在随身包里？那是因为我还有另外一个担惊处：“上有天堂，下有地狱，中间有个到处遍地都是的华裔社区”。解读：要是我敢有个房子或者银行存款，那是上有飞机和飞箭，下有地雷和地道，中间还有个华裔社区随时破门而入。所以我分析了一下，我依赖高科技保安能保障我的人生安全，也就同时顺带保障了我的六百万美金现款了。）
I heard there is a child mothered by a Vietnamese is announced this morning which is certainly none of my business. My biological children, definitely not fathered by the same person, are already in elementary school. I have missed their lovely toddler years is true.（我听说今天早上又宣布一个越南人所生的孩儿，又是个很肯定和我的亲生孩子们不是一个爹的宣布，所以又是个与我无关人的无关事。我自己亲生的孩子们都已经“七岁八岁狗都嫌”的上小学了。我错过了他们可爱的幼稚园时期是真的很遗憾。）
----July 21st of 2018
还有， 一些华裔认为就是不明白为什么那是我的钱，我只能说我没有任何责任义务解释也没有需要必须让谁谁明白，我的钱财只要合法就不关任何人的事。(Also, some Chinese kept on saying they do not understand why that is my money. I have to say it is not my obligation nor my responsibility to do the explanation. I don't have such need that I have to let be understood. As long as my money is lawfully my money, it is none of anyone else's business.)
方家后人可以考虑查询司法界人士及律师究竟什么才是方家后人他们自己的合法权益，甚至可以考虑设立或者模拟设立一份信托来了解什么是信托继承。如果是方家后人的法律权益，就应该可以查询到究竟是什么法律权益以及究竟由哪条法律条款所赋予或者所保障，所以请方家亲戚自己查询自己的合法权益究竟是什么之后，以及方家亲眷的合法权益究竟有没有被方敏所侵占之后，方家亲眷自然可以决定如何处理。我方敏确实不愿意被骚扰，我方敏确实没有拿方家亲眷的钱财，我方敏确实没有欠方家亲眷钱财，我方敏希望方家亲眷可以在确定我方敏没有侵占方家亲眷法律权益之后， 在方家亲眷情绪平静愿意尊重我方敏的合法权益之后，如有需要再联络我方敏。（Fang's offspring can consider consulting legal or justice professionals about exactly what their lawful rights & interests are, or to consider to set up a Trust entity or simulate to set up one to know exactly what Trust-Inheriting is. If there are indeed some Fang's offspring's lawful right & interest, then exactly by which law item granted or to protect should be able to be confirmed by legal professional's help, I ask Fang's relatives to please consult all these out themselves and to make their own decisions accordingly afterward. I never took any Fang's offspring's any money, nor owe them any money. I am not comfortable to be harassed. I wish Fang's relatives to decide if they want to contact me after they have confirmed their own lawful right& interests have not been impacted by my inheriting, and comfortable enough as well to respect my lawful rights & interests.)
方家每代都是在父辈去世时分家产，由继承人继承门户，其他后人则自立门户。只要你家是方家血脉，你家前辈就应该在其父辈去世分家自立门户时分到过方家的家产。如果你家从没分过方家的家产，你家从来就不是方家血脉。我爷爷兄妹是在1930年我曾祖父去世时分的家，我父亲兄妹是在1965年我爷爷去世时分的家，我相信我父亲目前是失踪。我于2004年继承我爷爷所设立信托继承我爷爷这支的方家。（Family inheriting in Fang's house happened when each generation's father passed away. If your family are Fang's offspring, your family should already have experienced the family inheriting when your family became an independent house while my grandfather inherited the deceased father's house as the heir. if your family never inherited anything from Fang's house, that is because you are never the Fang's offspring. My grandfather's siblings had family inheriting in 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away, my father's siblings had family inheriting in 1965 when my grandfather passed away. I believe my father currently is missing. I inherited my grandfather's house in 2004 after my Trust-Inheriting.)
07-20-2018 方家亲眷的愤怒 “究竟是想送礼还是在演戏？”( The anger of "This is gifting or
performing?")
听说了今天早上方家亲眷的愤怒。(Heard about this morning's anger expressed)
我的回应：(My response:)
我不是拖延送礼，拖延是因为我就是拿不到信托已支付的生活费用给付及我全部的智慧产权收入，身无分文无法送礼。香港信托的五亿美金投资本应在2014年底到期，也因2015年我的生活费用给付拿不到及美国纷传的“洗钱传闻”而由香港信托进行了投资延期的处理，听说目前这笔钱已被交给美国司法部。(I did not intend to delay the gifting, the delay was because I can't receive my living expense providing and all my intellectual income, I have been penniless. I heard the $500Million investment from Hong Kong was due by end of 2014, its investment was extended by the Hong Kong Trust entity because of the circled "money laundry" rumor and I can't receive my living expense provided. I heard it is currently in withheld by the U.S. Justice Department.)
目前我已经向美国警方投诉中国政府，洛家和高尔家通过广播剧及其相关活动进行公然讹诈，敲诈，抢劫和绑架活动。我不清楚事件真相如何。(I have filed the complaint to the U.S. law enforcement my accusation that Chinese government, R's families, and Gore's families have used radio program producing and promotion activities to conduct bilking, extortion, robbery, and kidnapping, etc. I do not the truth of what happened.)
我目前听说的是中国政府为了协助一些人的要钱要求，2015年起由中国政府外交部协助组织参与并由中国文化部宣传部及华裔社区进行“方敏不答应给钱就通过广播剧组织活动进行谩骂羞辱并不准方敏花钱”的所谓真人实景的演出活动。(What I heard was in order to assist demanding money, the Chinese government's foreign department facilitated, organized and participated in the performing show activities from the Chinese Culture Department and Propaganda Department and the Chinese communities abroad, the theme of this reality people in reality set performing show has been "Min Fang is not allowed not to hand in the money. Min Fang is not allowed to spend a penny and deserved to be abused is she dare not to hand in the money".)
波士顿华裔在确定知道按照美国法律我会有丰厚广播剧收入的情况下，坚决以他们就是在乎麻州政府现在付出的是麻州纳税人的钱为名吵闹骂砸就是"不准"麻州政府机构向我财务施援也已经被我向麻州政府投诉其可能的非法企图。(Knowing for certain I should have very handsome income from the radio program broadcasting according to the U.S. laws, some Boston Chinese insisted on to watch taxpayer's money on their same equal government employee-colleagues' behave to ensure I am not allowed to be helped by the reaching-out from the government agencies as the determination you heard the day before on the radio. I have filed my complaint to the Massachusetts State government regarding this.)
广播剧收入是在2016年由广播公司支付后被洛克菲勒家的女眷亲友非法提领。目前听说其中大部分的钱也已经在美国司法部。(My income from the radio program broadcasting was paid in 2016 but illegally deposited by several females from the R's family or related. I heard most of the amount has been overseeing by the U.S. Justice Department.)
美国的O家和其他一些人士就我的信托在美国所投资公司的所有权有些困绕是造成由这些公司所支付的我的生活费用给付被拖延的原因。听说我2015年2016年的生活费用给付是否合法已经澄清，其中通过联邦政府支付的部分也已经转入我的私人账户但还没有转入我自己在商业银行的账户，我也已向麻州政府查询我的信托通过麻州及波士顿向我支付的生活费用给付。(American O' families and others have been confused about the ownership of some American companies that my Trust entities have been investing. This delayed the pay-out of my living expenses because of the concern if the paid-out money is legal. I heard both 2015 and 2016 paid-out have been clarified as legal, those transmitted via Federal agency has been transferred to my name but not a commercial bank I have access to yet. I also started my inquiry to Massachusetts and Boston about the paid-out to local government agencies.)
我很理解方家亲眷的愤怒，我也只能说我收到钱就会尽快处理礼物事宜，我相信会很快。我本人目前的处境还是在被由中国政府组织进行的严密跟梢之中。 传言是中国政府坚持那些想要钱的人就必须做我的邻居甚至要求由我付费以免费居住以方便监视我的一言一行，我也已经表态坚决拒绝此类无理要求。估计由美国波士顿房管局华裔协助安排，不清楚这些华裔认识是否有听说美国由民事法庭可以进行财产继承权官司，不知这些所谓华裔优秀人才是否听说过没有法庭申诉依据又无要求司法调查的理由已经说明要钱从来不是这些人的合法权利？我甚至不清楚这些所谓的优秀华裔是否因为看不懂英文版本的美国法律是让他们如此困扰什么才是美国法律所赋予所保障的合法权益的原因。(I can imagine the anger but all I can say is I will take care of the gifting ASAP once I can receive the money. My current situation is I am still being stalked closely by those money-wanters possibly organized by the Chinese government. The rumor is the Chinese government insist on to let those who want some money to be my neighbor to live free and to "provide closed Residential surveillance" over me, I have refused this demand. I assume it is helped by some Chinese employed by the housing authority/ I don't know if these excellent government employees from Boston Chinese community have ever heard of demanding money is never lawful if there is no legal ground to file a civil lawsuit for the ownership of the money nor legal ground to request a criminal investigation if I steal money? I don't know if these so excellent government employees from the Boston Chinese community can read U.S. laws printed in English to know what are the lawful rights granted and protected by the U.S. laws? How can they be so confused what means lawful in the United States just because they were from China?)
还有啊，我听说广播剧已经造成一百多人的智慧产权在当事人不知情的情况下被非法提领是今天早上广播剧播出希望知情者向美国警方投诉的原因。(Also, I heard radio program has made over 100 in the dark victims of illegal transmitting the intellectual incomes. This is possibly the reason of this morning's broadcasting of "please tip the law enforcement.")
如果你本人或者你的朋友在参加了一个成功的研究项目之后，却没有任何智慧产权收入，也没人知道是什么原因造成。你可以自己或者替你的朋友向美国警方（应该是联邦调查局）陈述你所知道的，只要你说明白你不清楚你所投诉的是否是智慧产权最后评估的结果还是因为非法活动造成，你就不用担心是否会说错话。(If you or your friend had participated a successful project but did not receive any paying-out already intellectual incomes, you can tip the law enforcement about what you. I don't think if this will be an issue as long as you make it clear that you are not certain if the situation is the result of the final evaluation or illegal activities.)
还有， 一些华裔认为就是不明白为什么那是我的钱，我只能说我没有任何责任义务解释也没有需要必须让谁谁明白，我的钱财只要合法就不关任何人的事。(Also, some Chinese kept on saying they do not understand why that is my money. I have to say it is not my obligation nor my responsibility to do the explanation. I don't have such need that I have to let be understood. As long as my money is lawfully my money, it is none of anyone else's business.)
方家后人可以考虑查询司法界人士及律师究竟什么才是方家后人他们自己的合法权益，甚至可以考虑设立或者模拟设立一份信托来了解什么是信托继承。如果是方家后人的法律权益，就应该可以查询到究竟是什么法律权益以及究竟由哪条法律条款所赋予或者所保障，所以请方家亲戚自己查询自己的合法权益究竟是什么之后，以及方家亲眷的合法权益究竟有没有被方敏所侵占之后，方家亲眷自然可以决定如何处理。我方敏确实不愿意被骚扰，我方敏确实没有拿方家亲眷的钱财，我方敏确实没有欠方家亲眷钱财，我方敏希望方家亲眷可以在确定我方敏没有侵占方家亲眷法律权益之后， 在方家亲眷情绪平静愿意尊重我方敏的合法权益之后，如有需要再联络我方敏。（Fang's offspring can consider to consult legal or justice professionals about exactly what their lawful rights & interests are, or to consider to set up a Trust entity or simulate to set up one to know exactly what Trust-Inheriting is. If there are indeed some Fang's offspring's lawful right & interest, then exactly by which law item granted or to protect should be able to be confirmed by legal professional's help, I ask Fang's relatives to please consult all these out themselves and to make their own decisions accordingly afterward. I never took any Fang's offspring's any money, nor owe them any money. I am not comfortable to be harassed. I wish Fang's relatives to decide if they want to contact me after they have confirmed their own lawful right& interests have not been impacted by my inheriting, and comfortable enough as well to respect my lawful rights & interests.)
方家每代都是在父辈去世时分家产，由继承人继承门户，其他后人则自立门户。只要你家是方家血脉，你家前辈就应该在其父辈去世分家自立门户时分到过方家的家产。如果你家从没分过方家的家产，你家从来就不是方家血脉。我爷爷兄妹是在1930年我曾祖父去世时分的家，我父亲兄妹是在1965年我爷爷去世时分的家，我相信我父亲目前是失踪。我于2004年继承我爷爷所设立信托继承我爷爷这支的方家。（Family inheriting in Fang's house happened when each generation's father passed away. If your family are Fang's offspring, your family should already have experienced the family inheriting when your family became an independent house while my grandfather inherited the deceased father's house as the heir. if your family never inherited anything from Fang's house, that is because you are never the Fang's offspring. My grandfather's siblings had family inheriting in 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away, my father's siblings had family inheriting in 1965 when my grandfather passed away. I believe my father currently is missing. I inherited my grandfather's house in 2004 after my Trust-Inheriting.)
----2018年7月20日
07-19-2018 What are these females squeaking about?（今天早上这些女人都在叽叽哇哇些什么？）
Family inheriting (分家产）:
After family inheriting, the brothers and sisters are no longer in the same house. The heir owns the father's house.
（分过家产后，兄弟姊妹就不再是一家了，做父亲这支的家由继承人所拥有，这就是继承人的定义。）
In my family, each generation had family inheriting. My father's generation's family inheriting was in 1965 after my grandfather passed away. My father didn't inherit anything from my grandfather, I am the person who heads my grandfather's house after my 2004's inheriting of the Trust entity my grandfather set up for me.
（我们家每代都有分家产。我父亲这一代分家产是在1965年我爷爷去世时。我父亲没有继承到我爷爷的任何东西，我2004年继承了我爷爷替我设立的信托后就继承了我爷爷这支的方家。）
----July 19th, 2018
Heard about this morning's loud squeaking from so many agitated females.（听说了今天早上的一边女人吱哇嘈杂声）
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard Shanghai females are the group squeaking their butts and breasts truly know it is impossible that I have any inheriting.
I have to say I myself have womanly butts and breasts, and I am really rich enough to be disgusted by even envision their husbands' leftover-butts, so it is permanently that I won't give a penny to any female's breasts nor any female's butts.
（我听说那些说她们自己的奶子屁股最清楚我就没可能有钱的是一群上海女人。我只好说我自己是个女人，也有女人的奶子屁股呀，我有钱当然就认为他们那些丈夫的剩饭似的屁股真是想想都噁心啦。所以我是永远都不会付一分钱给女人屁股或是女人奶子。）
I heard Beijing females are the group insist on their males' Joy-Sticks truly know the Chinese history and global culture vertically across the time-space of the history and horizontally across the geographic space of the globe earth, and that's how their males became the Chinese national leaders' union.
I have to say this is the embarrassment to the Chinese college education that my three generations grandfathers had supported to establish.
（我听说是一群北京女人在坚持说他们男人的乐呵棍子才是真实的纵贯了然了中国的历史和横跨熟悉了全球的文化，他们的男人都已经乐呵成了中国国家领导人联合体啦。我只好说这是我三代爷爷们曾经捐款支持建立的中国高等教育的失败。）
I heard American females are the group very confident that the U.S. law enforcement won't do anything beyond bow to their middle achievement.
I have to say this is not what I can say anything about other than I am definitely protected by the U.S. law enforcement who are beyond the middle.
(我听说美国女人很自信的是她们的中段成就是可以让美国的执法人员见了就只会鞠躬的。我只好说除了我相信自己确实是被一些没为她们的中段成就鞠躬的美国执法人员保护着之外，这还真不是我可以评论的一份自信。）
----July 19th, 2018
Heard my great-grandmother's maiden name was not Yu（于）（听说了我曾祖母娘家不姓于）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I don't my great-grandmother's name is true, but I won't acknowledge that her last name is the one broadcasted this morning, because the substituting game is still on this radio program producing efforts. I am not willing to acknowledge whoever should be called my great-grandmother.
（我不清楚我曾祖母娘家姓氏是真的，但我不会认今天播出的就是我曾祖母娘家姓氏。广播剧上的的替换游戏还在进行，我不会随便就认谁是我的曾祖母。）
The normal substituting routine has been: Change the great-grandmother's maiden name first, then broadcasting the couple's grandchild who is fathered by a person whose name has the same Chinese characters of my father's name, to serve the purpose to broadcast this grandchild should be the real owner of the money I inherited.
（替换游戏通常的做法是：再换了曾祖母的姓氏，在广而告之这一对夫妻有个由和我父亲同名的儿子所生的孙子，这孙子才应该是我所继承财产的真正主人。）
----July 19th, 2018
07-18-2018 My father and I never heard of the $10,000 per month providing before this April of 2018.（我和我父亲在2018年4月前就从未听说过这每月一万美金的给付。）
Heard there is confusion about how would I don't care $10,000 per month for 29 years as I expressed on this blog if that is my living expenses paid-out.(t听说了疑问：“如果是我的钱，我怎么会不在乎每月1万美金被人给拿走了29年？”）
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard this was based on the impressed assumption that my parents and I all were willing let others take the money totaled about $3.5Million for over 29 years time when I was in China.
This assumption is an untrue statement.
（我听说有着疑问的原因是大众似乎认为我和我父母是自愿让别人把总共大约350万美金的钱就这么拿走29年的。大众的这种印象是错误的。）
The real reason was I never heard of this $10,000 until a couple of weeks before the public audience since April of 2018. I heard recently that my father was asked if he needed some money but he understood that was the charity help to the Private Assistant's own money. My parents and I had lived in Nanjing which was 4-6 hours train time from Shanghai where the money was sent and went disappeared, so we never heard of this monthly living expenses providing.
（真实的原因是我从未听说过有这么一笔每月1万美元的生活费用给付，我是在广播剧2018年4月开始播出1万美金故事的前一两个星期才听说的。我最近听说我父亲曾经被我爷爷的私人助理问过需不需要一点钱，我父亲当时以为我爷爷的私人助理是想用他自己的钱接济接济我父亲。我和我的父母是在南京生活，这每月的1万美金当时是被送到上海后就彻底在上海失踪了，所以我们一家在南京就从来没听说过有这么一个每月生活费给付。）
Remembered the fight for a dress between my father and mother of the "firstborn daughter", and the "Beijing ex-romance", I heard the "Beijing ex-romance" had received 100 per month possibly was the reason of the dress-fight which pissed-off my father who had no clue why he was not allowed to use his own salary money to buy a dress for his own daughter.
（还记得那个为一条女孩裙子吵了一架多出了一个“真正头胎女儿”，还有那个”北京前女友“吗？我听说那个“北京前女友”每个月有收到100美金是引发吵架的原因，这架吵得我父亲当时是某明奇妙还气到半死，就是不明白他为什么就不可以用他自己的工资钱替他自己的女儿买条裙子。）
The piss me off talks about the "real true love" about how my mother and I were never loved by my father was because of the understanding that my father seems "refused" to let his marriage family have any money other than his shabby salary.
（还有那个把我气得半死的“真正最爱”说法，也就是我妈和我从来就不是我父亲所爱，就是因为“出于很理解”我父亲一定是宁愿把钱送人，也绝不肯让我和我妈可以过上比他自己微薄的工资所可以提供的好一点的生活。）
My blog truthfully reflects how I feel when I heard of this $10,000 per month almost at the same time with the public audience since April of 2018. I heard this is the American company invested by an 1100 years old Trust entity that I inherited without any clue in 2004, this is the American company paid-out $400Million medical and $400Million living expenses in October of 2016 according to the instruction. This American Fund company is a Ford Holding's investor.
（我的博文所写是我2018年4月左右听说这每月1万美元故事后的真实想法。我听说这家美国公司是由1100年前的一个爷爷所设立的信托所投资的，我是在从未听说过这个信托的情况下在2004年继承了这个信托。就是这家美国公司2016年为我的4亿美金医疗4亿美金和4亿美金生活费用按上级公司指示开具支票的。这家美国公司是福特控股的一家投资基金公司。）
None of my father's sibling was born before 1930 when my great-grandfather passed away so that none of them had a name given by my grandfather yet. The Trust entity set up by my grandfather was in 1948 and he passed away in 1965. My grandfather never updated his settler's letter.
(我的曾祖父是在1930年去世的，我父亲及他的弟妹还没有出生也都还没被我爷爷起个名字。我爷爷设立信托是在1948年，我爷爷是在1965年去世的。我爷爷至死都从未更改过他的信托委托书。）
I refuse my money to be paid out against my with from this company, and I refuse to give out any of my shares of investment in this company.
（我拒绝这家公司违反我的意愿给出我的钱，我也拒绝让出我在这家公司的任何投资份额。)
I refuse any Extortion-alike "you just have to give the money" demand to be forwarded by any company or any individual.
（我拒绝任何个人或者任何公司向我转达类似敲诈的不给就是不行的要钱要求。）
This American Fund company is 100% privately legally owned by its British Investor Fund company.
（这家美国基金公司是100%由其上级英国投资基金公司全额合法拥有。）
I heard "We don‘t have to be your money" was said by some investments of this American fund company, so I am asking is this saying means the person's own intention to illegally own this money this person self if this person implying don't have to charity this money to me?
(我听说”我们又不需要非把这钱归你所有“是由这家美国公司所投资的一些企业的某些人说的。那我就问说这话的这些人是在说你们从来就不需要把这钱扔给我来施舍施舍我，那你们是在暗示你们自己是想非法把这钱归你们这些人自己所有吗？）
----July 18th, 2018
07-17-2018 Loud Victory announced by the Chinese:" No Russian ever has anything to with you is a certainty !!!"(t听说了今天早上华人向量的胜利之声：“俄国人和你一点关系都没有。”）
Heard this morning's so loud victory in this morning's broadcasting（听说了今天早上播出的胜利之音）.
My response: （我的回应：）
If you wonder what this morning's broadcasting is about that you can't pinpoint, and if you hear the replay you have recorded somehow, you probably can hear the emotion so loud and clear from the victory of the certainty: " No Russian ever has anything to with you is a real TRUTH !!!"（如果你在奇怪今天早上的播出究竟主题是什么好像很清晰但不确定是什么，如果你有早上播出内容的录音可以回放，你可能就能够挺高一份情绪是响亮又高昂：胜利是如此的确定：“俄国人和你从来就没有任何关系是一个真实是一个事实。”
What special industry considers this is an important victory? a new one called Politicians? for Diplomating aspects?（究竟会是什么特种行业认为这是如此重大的胜利？一种新兴的企业叫做政治j家？为了特别大写的“外交关心”？）
Some of this morning's announcements are from the People's Republic of China's Central Political Committee who certainly has the power to ensure it is broadcasted as they intended, U.S. police officers help is just a phone call away for any Chinese so privileged national leaders. Others a Chinese communities U.S. government officials. （今天早上有些宣布的内容就是中国中央政治局几个常委的原音宣布，他们可是有权有势就只要一个电话就可以要求美国的警察协助保障广播剧所播出的就是他们本人想公开宣布的。其他做宣布的还有一些是华裔美国政府官员。）
I personally take all these announcements are expressing "murder for money determined".(我个人认为今天早上所播出的根本就是”谋财害命宣言”。）
Why I say so? Well, if you live abroad, it is never a surprise, if not daily, to watch how Chinese consulates can be surrounded and yelled at: "You are the Mother-Fuckers, You are the whore-borns, and that is all who the fuck you are." And no one would hear any sound from the People's Republic of China's consulates no matter how huge the crowds might be and how loud is the yelling towards the People's Republic of China's Consulates. (我为什么这么认为？哎呦，你要是生活在国外，就知道有种现象就算不是每天看见，但也绝对不是什么稀罕事。 那就是中华人民共和国各大领事馆的外面有好大一堆人对着中华人民共和国的领事馆嘶吼：”你们就是一群会操亲妈的畜生杂种，你们就是一群婊子养的狗屎，你们就是他妈的这么一群东西。”不管这外面的人群有多么人山人海，或者骂声有多么响彻云霄，就从来没听过见过哪个中华人民共和国的领事馆会开门出来发点声。）
I just called them whores and prostitutes plus mother-fuckers as well as whore-borns. How huge can this be? Why the People's Republic of China's government needs to be so high profile to respond with such a loud determination of victory so confirmed? So I say, this is the broadcasting of murder for money intended.（我也就是痛骂他们是一群婊子一群妓院娼妓外加一群婊子养的畜生杂种及会操亲妈的狗屎而已。有什么了不起的？就这点痛骂哪里会需要中国政府如此高规格来做出胜利就是如此确定的响亮回应？所以我说这广播的播出其实是在宣布想要谋财害命而已。)
Regarding the Chinese community "representatives" of this morning's broadcasting, well, you would know what they are after you verified the broadcasted story of "Yesterday stole a mug in Walmart" story was a complete made up because that was the mug I took from my apartment when I left for Walmart. And I did not linger near the mug section at all when I was at Walmart. Everyone you heard who has the power to evict me from the "welfare system" for the caring of tax-payers' money should be powerful enough to ask to verify the story by watching the city-watch surveillance video owned by the government. (至于今天早上所播出的华裔代表，这么说吧，你核实过所播出的那个“昨天在沃尔玛偷杯子”的故事纯是人为编造，你就很清楚他们都是些什么东西了。昨天那个杯子就是我从自己家里带着出门去沃尔玛的，我在沃尔玛逗留时也根本就没在卖杯子的自助柜台逗留过。那些号称有本事也铁了心的可以把我从美国福利系统里给赶出去不准我占用纳税人的福利钱的，可都应该是有权有势可以要求查看市区警民联防的警方录影资料以核实昨天沃尔玛故事是否真实的。）
All the above is either what I heard or what I think. （以上所发布的要么是我听说的要么是我认为的。）
----July 17th, 2018
07-16-2018 My great-grandmother Yu was from a traditional polygamist family's sixth wife may be the reason of these Yu-s' ridiculousness (我的于姓曾祖母是第六房妻子所出可能是这些于姓人士如此岂有此理的原因）
Heard this morning's talk about my housing.（听说了今天早上所谈的我的房子事宜）
My response:（我的回应：）
I truly appreciate this is addressed. I am not certain if this is from the Boston Housing Authority or the law enforcement yet, but I did ask both to help on this matter is a true statement.（我很谢谢终于来处理这个问题了，但我还不太清楚这是波士顿廉租屋管理局还是警方所谈，我是向这两个地方寻求过帮助。）
----July 16th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my great-grandmother who was a Miss Yu(于) as well. (听说了今天早上谈到我的曾祖母也姓于。)
My response: (我的回应：）
I know my great-grandmother was the second wife to my polygamist great-grandfather and mother of all my great-grandfather's children. My great-grandfather's barren first wife was a fourth cousin to my great-grandmother by rumor. My family has always privileged the mother of the heir as the King Mother because of my family's Imperial family history and birthmark inheriting rule. (我知道我的曾祖母是我一妻多夫曾祖父的第二个妻子，也是我曾祖父所有孩子的母亲。我曾祖父的第一个妻子不生，好像也姓于，是我曾祖母的一个四等亲。因为我们家里的帝王家世背景以及胎记继承规则，我们家里继承人的生母一直都有着母后娘娘的待遇。）
My great-grandmother's father obviously raised her well because she was one of the rare females in her time who received the education. Her biggest proud might be it was her father-in-law, her husband and her first-born son who were acknowledged, by the Republic of China's government, as the three generations' biggest donors from the Fang's house who had supported the majority of the College education fund that Republic of China's Education Department needed to establish colleges to promote college education in China.（很显然我曾祖母的父亲对我曾祖母很好，让我曾祖母念过书成为她那个时代少有的受过教育的女性。我曾祖母最大的骄傲可能就是她的公公，她自己的丈夫，她自己的头胎儿子是中华民国政府所认可的方家三代捐款大户，三代所捐款项是当时中华民国教育部兴办大学推动中国大学教育所需款项的绝大部分。）
I heard my great-grandmother was from the sixth wife of her traditional polygamist father who did not have a birthmark inheriting rule though. When my great-grandmother's marriage was negotiated, her father-side relatives wanted to replace her with some Miss Yu-s from her father's this or that cousin's first wife, but my great-grandfather and her own father both insisted on she would be the bride. This issue had been Yu's families' shared issue after my great-grandparents' marriage when another Miss Yu married my great-grandfather's cousin. As you may be so impressed from what you heard on the radio and what rumored in reality, this is still a huge issue today that my great-grandmother was not born by a first wife from the Yu's family even after every wife in China is a first wife now.（我听说我的曾祖母是她传统一夫多妻父亲的第六房妻子所生，不过他们家可没有什么胎记继承规则。听说当年我的曾祖父母谈婚论嫁时，于家就一直想把我曾祖母给换成她父亲这个那个亲戚的大房老婆所生的孩子，是我的曾祖父及我曾祖母自己的父亲坚持我的曾祖母才是新娘。在我曾祖父母结婚后又有了一个于家的小姐嫁给我曾祖父的堂兄弟，这个陈年老纠结好像就成了于家共同的耿耿于怀。就像你现在在广播剧里以及在现实生活中的传言里所听到的一样，在如今中国所有的老婆都是大房老婆之后，我曾祖母不是于家的大房老婆所生还是所谓于家人最大的鄙视。）
A tip information: I heard it was after 1920 China's polygamist marriage became prostitutes and beggars' marriages only except the first wife's marriage, I heard it was the efforts from the Republic of China's government's media promotion to eliminate polygamist marriages. After 1949, I heard, the People's Republic of China's government had forcefully separated existing polygamist families and encouraged the mothers to have a job for the same purpose. My great-grandmother was born before 1900, my grandfather was born in 1912.（一个小小的信息：我听说是在1920年以后，中国的一夫多妻婚姻的小妾成了娼妓和讨饭的代名词，我听说这是因为中华民国政府利用宣传媒体取缔一夫多妻婚姻的努力。1949年解放以后，我听说中华人民共和国政府是强制分开当时的一妻多夫家庭，并鼓励已经做了母亲的小妾做工就业以实现同样的目的。我的曾祖母是1900年以前出生的，结婚后是在1912年生下我的爷爷。）
So, I announce here: (我在这里宣布：）
All my grandmothers were the King Mothers,（我所有的奶奶都是母后娘娘。）
My father was mothered by his father's only wife.（我的父亲是由他父亲即我爷爷的唯一妻子所生。）
I myself is mothered by my father's only wife.（我自己是由我父亲的唯一妻子所生。)
I am the heir to the long-history Fang's house.（我是有着悠久历史的方家的继承人小姐。）
I refuse to privilege any of my great-grandmother's cousins' children.（我拒绝把我曾祖母的娘家于姓亲戚的小孩当成是方家的后人。）
I refuse anyone from last name Yu( 于) to take Fang's house as their own.（我拒绝任何于姓人士把方家的一切当成是他们于家自己的。）
----July 16th, 2018
07-15-2018 my searching diary "what did I inherit if I did inherit"(我的找寻日记 --“如果我真的有继承财产，我继承的究竟是什么呀”）
Heard this morning's talk about the American "Pejoves" Fund company.（听说了今天早上提到了美国“Pejoves”基金公司）
My response: （我的回应:)
I already expressed myself refuse to give up any share that my Trust entity has invested, and I really don't need to say anything else beyond this. (我已经表达了我本人拒绝放弃我所继承的信托对这家公司的任何投资份额。除此之外，我也确实不需要再说什么了。）
I have published a lot on this blog in hope my missing father can read me if he does a search of his own name together with my name in Chinese, I hope the same for my mother as well if she is still alive. I don't know where they are but I am confident about their well-being because I have entrusted my care for them since 2004. I hope they know my experience to better take care of themselves while I can't take care of them myself. This is also the blog of my searching diary "what did I inherit if I did inherit". I share an essay here that I wrote about how my life changed because of this search.（我在这个博客上发表了很多博文，我希望我失踪的父亲用中文将他自己的名字和我的名字一起做个搜寻就可以看到，我也是这么希望我的母亲还在也可以用这方法看到我的博文。我不知道他们在哪里，但我相信他们很好就因为我在2004年办理信托时也托付了我对他们的照顾。我希望他们能知道我的经历，能在我还不能亲自照顾他们时可以照顾好他们自己。这博客也是我的找寻日记 --“如果我真的有继承财产，我继承的究竟是什么呀“。我在这里分享我所写的一篇有关我的生活变更的散文。）
Essay of "what did I inherit if I did inherit"（散文“如果我真的有继承财产，我继承的究竟是什么”）
I quitted my computer professional job in 2007 with the anticipation of having an early retirement life when the radio program majorly featured my life experiences had already had a successful run for two years in the United States. My life change had been so unbelievable to a lot of people who had known me, but so comfortably settled-in by myself: I became the homeless in 2009.（我是在2007年广播剧已经在美国热播我的人生经历故事两年后辞去了我的电脑上班族的工作，准备享受一份可以提早退休的悠闲生活。让很多认识我的人很吃惊但我自己却怡然自得的一个生活改变是在2009年，我成了一个街上的流浪汉。）
I was advised to have some homeless experiences by a Chinese “guest” to my meeting on July 1st of 2004. I was not the person invited him. I heard recently that he shared the same last name but not having blood association with me – it has been rumored that his family has been a result of a relative's marriage issue several generations ago. Ever since that generation, I heard his family has been following around my great several grandfather's line (a junior half-brother to that relative), the saying was "they are following the money". I heard himself was mothered by a Miss Yu (于). I wish I knew who he is and why he was invited into my meeting to know this advice was possibly never good intentioned.（在2004年7月1日，我在我的电讯会议上被一个华裔“客人”建议去做个流浪汉。他不是由我邀请参加这个会议的客人。我听说他和我同姓但没有任何血缘关系 --据说他们家是我们家几代以前的一个亲戚婚姻困扰的结果。好像我们家这支那一代的曾祖父是那个亲戚的同父异母幼弟，我听说他们家被我们家的那个亲戚发现后，从那一代开始，我们家就一直被他们家跟着，据说他们家是在跟着钱走。我听说他本人的妈妈姓于，我真是希望我当时知道他是谁可能就会猜到这建议也许是一点善意都没有的。）
I came from a family with a lot of family stories of “what happened to the family wealth”, such as my grandmother married into the house full of gold-bricks, my great-grandfather could afford to buy a car in 1920’s China, but wealth went disappeared in my grandfather’s generation, etc. I was not surprised at all when I was told I inherited some handsome wealth invested abroad according to my grandfather’s will. I did not even ask which generation grandfather had blessed me. When I was all happy about my life could be easier after I take care of my anxiety health situation that I had developed around 2004, this "be homeless" was the advice that I was not afraid of adventuring. （我们家里一直有很多“家里以前的钱究竟怎么回事”的故事，比如我奶奶进门的时候家里到处都是一堆堆的金砖，我曾祖父在20年代的中国是可以买得起小轿车的，但是到了我爷爷那一代，家里的钱就不见了，等等。所以当我被告知按照我爷爷的遗嘱，我继承了我爷爷投资海外的财产时，我是一点都没奇怪。我甚至都没问究竟是那一代的爷爷对我这么好。当我很开心我可以在照顾好我自己当时因为生活各方面压力过大而产生的恐惧症状后就可以过个快乐人生，所以我对这个探险建议是一点都没担心过。）
In January of 2015, I had this nightmare experience of realizing that my financial situation wouldn’t change even I already fed up with my homeless game. I was yelled at why I would fancy I could stuck-on some rich men I met a long time ago, I was told I never had any professional achievements no matter how popular smartphones have been, and I was told my father "died" when I was unreachable, and my own last will was already prepared so I could just die alone in poverty in my current residence.（2015年1月，我就像噩梦惊醒一般意识到就算我已经玩腻了流浪者游戏，我的经济状况好像是不会改变的。我被人当街吼着我怎么会认为可以缠着一个多年以前就只见过一面的有钱男人, 我到哪儿面对的都是众人“就算智能手机普及，可你就是从来就没有过任何职业上的成就”这么一种态度，我被告知当我无法联络时，我的父亲“也已经去世了”，甚至说是遗嘱都已经替我准备好了让我可以安心在我现在住的这个一室套房里穷困潦倒等死就得，等等。）
I have been expecting my own birth Chinese grandfather’s blessing to provide for me financially, never any rich man’s never-romance money, but where is the money? The few references I remembered have been controversial. The American companies I thought I inherited have been registered to British companies in the entire companies’ history, the grandfather who blessed me was not my same last name, etc. The journey started off to find where is my money became the journey of finding my family ancestry, what happened to my computer professional achievements, and most importantly, a historical review of what I have inherited, etc., as you heard on the radio.（我其实一直是在等我自己亲生爷爷给我的钱来提供我的生活费用，从来不是什么有钱人的“从没发生过的裤裆钱”，但究竟钱在哪里? 我所记得的仅有的一些线索有很奇怪。我以为是我继承的美国公司其实都是法律上注册为英国公司的子公司的，听说这些公司的投资人不是姓方的，等等。就这样，我这一路“钱在哪里”的过程同时就又成了我的家世历史的探寻之旅，“我的电脑专业的成就怎么没了”的问询之路，以及最重要的，这是”我究竟继承了什么的”漫长历史回顾，就如你在广播剧里所听到的。)
The change started when I face the reality-real question if I have ever inherited. I started my confronting efforts in January of 2015 by walking into a police station in Boston of Massachusetts and asked where I should find any help if I am certain I have "inherited something" experience but I don’t know where to send out inquiries. Ever since then, I started my journey of finding out what my inheriting experience means.（改变是从我买你对这个现实又实际的问题，就是如果我真的有继承财产，那我究竟继承了成了什么？我选择了面对，我是在2015年1月走进了波士顿的一家警察局，探寻如果我确实有继承财产的经历又不知该如何查询的情况下，我应该如何寻求帮助？从那时到现在，我就是这么一路颠簸走来。）
Currently, what I found out have been: I came from a long history Chinese Tang dynasty Emperors’ line as their birthmark heir girl. This was probably related to the reason I was not surprised at all why I am the person inherited: I knew I have been The Very Important Girl to my family ever since I was little; My family's last name has changed because of some dangerous situation happened; The references are controversial because what I inherited are the Trust entities which have been the investor entities to some American Fund companies. And most luckily, I have entrusted my caring to my parents in 2004 as well, it includes the “emergency safety caring” that made me hold my hope that my parents may have been “rescued”.（如今我所找的的一些信息是：我是中国唐朝皇帝的女性掌纹继承人。这可能和我继承当时一点没奇怪为什么是我继承有点关系：我从小就知道我是我们家里非常重要的一个女孩。我们家改姓是因为家里遇到过一些危险；继承的参考信息很奇怪是因为我所继承的其实是信托，是我所继承的信托一直有投资一些美国的公司。最幸运的是，我托付了我对我父母的照顾包括紧急照顾，让我一直期望我的父母双亲被“援救了”。）
I am still searing for the answer “where is my money”, but my searching narrowed to where is the paid-out living expenses from the Trust entities I inherited. The searching journey if I inherited has been 3 and ½ years already, I still need to emphasize the inheriting means I got the money from an already deceased person, never a living person. I am surprised how this confusion "if I expect any money from a couple of negative never-romances" can deny my professional female-being together with the never-romances. (我还在找寻“我的钱在哪里”，但我现在找的是我所继承的信托已经支付的生活费用在哪里。这份寻寻找找已经有3年半的时间了，我还的时不时地强调继承是指收到了去世的人留下的钱，从来不是什么活人给的钱。让我惊讶的是这份“我是否在等有钱男人不想给的裤裆钱“困扰居然可以在彻底否定恋爱经历的同时，居然就此彻底否定了我作为职业女性的职业成就。)
----July 15th, 2018
07-14-2018 The chart is in simple English and Shanghainese are shrewd enough (表格是简单英语，上海人又是很精明的）
Heard this morning's big argument why can't have the money from the company.（听说了今天早上所争议的的为什么不可以从公司拿钱？）
My response:（我的回应：）
In the entire People's Republic of China, I only recommend Shanghainese, not even from neighboring area, should be invited to take a look at the following table to bring out their comments of the argument on where anyone can expect money to be spent from?（整个中华人民共和国，我就推荐应该让上海人民来看看下面这张表（上海周边地区人民都不行），然后来谈谈他们认为公司什么地方有可能为这些就是该有钱拿的人从公司开支？）
I am presenting my points:（我提出我的观点：）
Before the company paying the taxes, all the law people are staring at each expense for tax purpose;
（在公司缴纳公司税之前，执法人员全盯着公司的开支是否有偷漏税行为。）
After company-taxes paid, every penny of the Net Income is owned by the British investor company.
(公司缴纳了公司税之后，盈利的每一分钱都是归英国投资公司所有。）
A private company's auditing rules are defined by the investor which is the British investor company.
（审计法所依据的审计规则， 私营公司的由其投资机构所指定，也就是由英国公司制定。）
So, let's look at the ridiculousness here: (来看看这些某明奇妙：）
1: Where this deserved money can be spent by this American company? (这“就是应该拿的钱”有可能从美国公司的什么地方开支啊？）
2: If this person can have the opportunities to argue, to self-announce, and to self-promote on the radio to be the real best and the most deserved person, how could this person possibly become the real owner of the American company in the reality of a lawful country to take over the Net Income?（如果这个人可以在广播上连吵闹加自我宣布再加自我深情表白自己才是最好最配拿钱的一个，有什么可能这个人就可以将自己因此而变成一个在法治国家这个现实中的美国公司真正主人而把美国公司的盈利（从英国公司手里）给那走啊？)
Why Shanghainese? Well, Shanghainese are famous for their shrewdness of only participating in any activity for benefits but never for any trouble. （为什么上海人？上海人在中国是有名的精明：有好处才参与，只有麻烦没有好处就躲得远远。）
----July 14th, 2018
Heard the possible "negotiation of possible shares“. (听说了可能”谈判一下可能的份额“）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I refuse this possibility. I already made myself very clearly: I am the sole beneficiary person clearly specified by the Settler grandfather's will, and my inheriting was the Trust-inheriting are the reasons I did not take anyone's possible inheritable share in any Trust-entity I inherited. (我拒绝这样的可能。我已经讲得很清楚了，我是委托人爷爷在委托信遗嘱里指明的唯一受益人，我的继承的是信托继承，这是我说我所继承的任何一个信托里都没有任何其他人份额的原因。）
So, I refuse any kind "negotiation" possibility. (所以我拒绝任何这样的”谈判“可能。）
I consider "just can't understand" as harassment if anyone refuses to consult the law professionals regarding any concern or any possible accusation if I steal others' possible inheritable, etc. related to the matter but insist on negotiating with me. （对我的继承有些疑问甚至有一些“方敏是否偷了方家其他人的钱”的指责，却坚决不去咨询法律界或向警界求助，只是不停对我表达“就是不理解”等种种做法，我认为是纯属骚扰行为。）
I refuse to be harassed in the name of "negotiating".（我拒绝被以谈判为名而骚扰。）
----July 14th, 2018
Regarding $10,000 monthly providing confusions. (有关每月一万美金生活费的疑问）
My response: （我的回应：）
I heard one confusion was why not call for help to get the money.（我听说一个疑问就是为什么不呼救？）
I was born in 1967 when China was in culture revolution time.（我是于1967年在中国的文化大革命期间出生的。）
Chinese culture revolution time was 1966-1976. It was the time when government officials could be grabbed by a Red Guard teenage on a street to be permanently locked up in a dark room till the death.（中国的文化大革命是从1966到1976年。当时的国家干部是可以在街上被一个十几岁的红卫兵直接抓走，再被永远的关在一个黑屋子里直到死亡。）
----July 14th, 2018
07-13-2018 I am quiet because I got the meaning of the 2016 information
Heard "the voice" getting stronger because I have been no sound.
My response:
I heard this morning's talk is all about I am not good enough for any decent name for any reason. Is it because I have no sound lately? Exactly, whose voice is getting so loud and strong?
It is "the voice" of who owns the American "Pejoves" Fund company. I heard O's family has been blamed for not standing strong on the similar matter, and the proud expressed this morning was "This same person now obviously have no sound at all, only the company is still squeaking. Just need to be tough enough."
When I was told about the British East India company's financier, the intention was to tell me that the American company has been registered privately to a British company, not to any American. Well, I got it means I own the British Investor company as well, I assume Os were busy confirming about the American company's "Independent Talk", I assume that's all we got from this 2016's information.
Actually, for everyone else, it means who owns the net income money after the American Fund company paid its U.S. Company Tax which is its British investor company.
Now, I got this correctly is the reason I have been so quiet about any confusion regarding the American "Pejoves" Fund company. The Trust entity I inherited has been this American "Pejoves" Fund company's upstream investor which is several investor-companies away, and I already expressed myself not willing to give up any share that my Trust entity has invested, so I should not have any sound at all regarding anything else.
I heard this morning's talk of tax donation to China.（听说了今天早上所谈的向中国捐税之说)
My response:（我的回应：）
I refuse. I refuse to pay to be a victim, I refuse to be a paid victim, I refuse to be a victim. (我拒绝。我拒绝付钱成为受害者，我拒绝收钱成为受害者，我拒绝做一个受害者·。）
I have been the victim of this administration of the Chinese government's abusive usage of its government resources and the government's staff. （我是这一届中国政府滥用公款滥用公务员公权力的受害者。）
This entire radio program since 2015 has been an entertainment “performing arts' show” organized by the Chinese Culture Department, Chinese Foreign Department, Chinese Communication (Propaganda) Department, Chinese Military Entertainment group, and Chinese Central government Political Committee.（从2015年起的广播剧有关活动，都是由中国文化部，中国外交部，中国宣传部，中国军方文艺部门及中国中央政治局所组织的一场大规模的“文艺演出活动”。）
I have been the victim of this Chinese administration's organized blackmails scheme, cheating scheme, and extorting scheme. My life has been threatened by this forceful demanding for money without any legal ground.（我是中国这一届政府所组织的讹诈伎俩，欺诈伎俩及敲诈伎俩的受害者。我自己的人身财产安全都被这种没有任何法律依据的就是要钱的要求而威胁着。）
My inheriting has been birthmark sole-beneficiary person Trust-Inheriting by clearly written wills. There is no legal confusion about the Trust-wealth nor who is the sole beneficiary person. There is no legal ground for anyone to file a civil lawsuit regarding my inheriting nor any privilege to commit any crime.（我的继承是由遗嘱明确指定胎记掌纹唯一受益人的信托继承。既没有关所于信托财产的任何法律上的困扰，也没有关于我是唯一受益人的法律上的困扰。没有任何人可以就我的继承相关的法律困扰而向民事法庭起诉，更没有任何可以因此犯法的特权。）
I refuse to fund or refund these kind activities via its Central Reserve's tax collecting.（我拒绝以向中国政府缴税方式出资资助或者报销这一类活动。）
I refuse. I refuse to pay to be a victim, I refuse to be a paid victim, I refuse to be a victim.(我拒绝。我拒绝付钱成为受害者，我拒绝收钱成为受害者，我拒绝做一个受害者·。）
----July 12th, 2018
About what I heard of this organized performing arts presentations.（我所听说的一些有关这次演出活动的）
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard Chinese actresses and actors groups have been performing worldwide,（我听说中国的男女演员们是在世界各地开展这种演出活动：）
The theme in Italy was: "Fight against illegal organization format, the Family."（在意大利演出的主题是：坚决反对违法组织结构：黑手党家族。）
The theme in the U.K. has been: "Show you the difference between the Continentals and the Islanders".（在英国演出的主题：“让你们见识一下泱泱大国气势和小小岛国娟秀之间的区别”。）
The theme in the U.S. has been: "If you know any English, you know the U.S. has really awful laws."（在美国演出的主题：“你要是会英语，你就知道美国法律根本就是拿你一点办法都没有。”）
----July 12th, 2018
Heard this morning's attorney（有关今天早上的律师）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I don't know if he wants to be my attorney or he has been hired by my entrusting attorneys.（我不知道他是想做我的律师，还是已经被我的信托律师所雇佣的。）
In another word, I am currently not his client yet, and I don't know if my entrusting attorneys are his client, so I don't know who is his client.（换句话说就是，我目前肯定没有雇佣他，我不知道我的信托律师有没有雇佣他，所以我不知道是谁雇佣他的。）
----July 12th, 2018
07-11-2018 Happy I am not expected to be a leftover's partner.
Heard this morning' teary story telling.
My response:
I heard the one choking handsome 40-ish already married to his wife in 2007, a never secret in the U.S. entertainment industry.
Others, well...
All are none of my business other than I need to make the statement that I am happy to be the refused potential client to this type of matching with a permanently-leftover-for-life dating service.
Another note to the statement: A male in his 60s promised his life-long willingness this morning to have sex with anyone who is(was, has been, will be) my enemy,
I say I wish I can be near to a farm place to piss off a well good numbered biologically authentic and convincing enough female pig-s to make his life busy with promising-fulfilling-s from his promised willingness.
I refuse all these persons to spend any of my money.
----July 11th, 2018
07-10-2018 Now searching is narrowed to if and where is the paid-out from the Trust entity I am the sole beneficiary of. (现在"寻宝"就是在寻我是唯一受益人的信托是否已支付以及钱在哪里。）
Heard this morning's talk about Boston government agencies' explanation and frustration （听说了今天早上波士顿政府机关的解释及气愤）.
My response:（我的回应：）
Well, I am the British East India Company Financier is never a joke but a statement, I can lawfully state so because a Trust entity I inherited has been its upstream investor. This historic "title" was the reason for "romantic rumors" associated with the British Royals.（我是英国东印度公司的投资人，这话从来不是一句玩笑而是一份声明。我可以合法这么自称就是因为我所继承的一家信托机构是其上游的一个投资机构。这个已经有点历史的“头衔”是坊间曾有一些英国王室恋爱奇闻的原因。）
I know the frustration is because I complained my civil right got impacted that they were making the quiet presentation of "No such American male's rich heart, no such money." when I inquired about my providing from my own inherited Trust entity that set up for me by my own birth Chinese grandfathers.（我知道了气愤的原因，就是因为我曾向麻州总检察长办公室投诉波士顿的政府机关歧视我目前没有性生活的状态是在侵犯我的基本人权，我投诉我问他们我自己亲生华人爷爷替我设的信托机构所付给我的钱在哪，他们就沉默以对一副“没有了男人的富裕心，就没有了这钱"。）
I am glad to hear that Boston government agencies did not discriminate against my current sexual status as an inactive female. They truly don't know what I was saying because they have not been the office to know the financial arrangement details. I believe this explanation because I had been telling them where to find my big inherited money which has never been their job when my debt size is so no comparison small.（我很高兴听到波士顿政府机关确实没歧视我现在独自一人生活的状态。他们不是专门负责这项委托业务的办公室，不知道有关这份委托的具体情况，所以确实不知道我在说什么。我相信这份解释，我确实是一直在向他们指明去哪找我所继承的大笔钱财来还我所欠的小小债务，替我找钱确实还真不是他们的工作。）
Now, I learned that my inquiries, with some references, should be all about if there are paid-out funds for my living expenses provided in these departments.（现在我学会了，我的询问应该是提供一些线索来查询我的信托机构是否已经支付给他们的部门一些我的生活费用了。）
----July 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about the sole beneficiary（听说了今天早上有关唯一受益人的谈论）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I am the sole beneficiary specified in the Settler's Letter that is several hundred years old is because I am the expected girl who carries a family birthmark. My family had waited for 2500 years to have such a girl who has the family birthmark finally born. It has been a long waiting for my family to finally have me to be their little girl heir. I am specified as the Birthmark-Palm girl-heir from the Birthmark-Palm boy-heirs' line in the Settler's Letter.（我是唯一受益人是在信托设立人所立的信托委托书里清楚写明的，这份几百年前的委托书里可以在我还未生出就已经明确指定我是唯一受益人就因为我是我们家在等着的有继承胎记的女孩。我们家可是经过了2500年才很不容易的将这个女孩给生出来了。我们家真是等我这个胎记女孩等了很久诶。我在信托设立人的委托书里是被指定为胎记掌纹儿子这支所生的胎记掌纹女儿。）
Regarding some confusion how other offspring know they are not the specified beneficiary person of the Trust entity I inherited. Well, by the factor the Trust entity are several hundred years old, and those offspring are not even over 100 years old yet so that they don't even have a name to be specified in the Settler's letter.（至于有些方家其他后人如何确定他们不是我所继承的信托机构的指定受益人，这么说吧，就只要依据事实，也就是我所继承的信托机构已经有好几百年的存在历史，而他们都还不足百岁的事实，也就是在信托设立时他们都还没生出来这个事实就应该可以确定信托设立人当年所写的委托书里不可能会有他们的名字。）
Since ancient time, each generation all had family-wealth inheriting till my father's generation when my grandfather passed away in 1965. I do not know if any of them also has any Trust entity set up somewhere by their own seniors.（自古开始一直到我爷爷1965年去世时的我父亲这代，我们家每一代都有分家分财产。我完全不知道这些方家后人当中是否还有其他人也有家中老人替谁在什么地方设立过什么信托。）
My inheriting in 2004 was the Trust-Entities Inheriting, Not the family-wealth inheriting. （我在2004年的继承是继承信托机构，不是继承家族因老人去世分家产所分财产。）
I am the sole beneficiary person is what clearly specified in each Settler's letter of the Trust entities I inherited.（我是唯一受益人是我所继承的所有这些信托机构的信托设立人在委托书里所明确指定的。）
*An Entity is an organization that is equivalent to a company which means a format of a legally valid organization.（一个Entity 就是一个类似于”公司”的机构组织，是一种法律上的有效机构又称法人机构。）
----July 10th, 2018
07-09-2018 Politely and publicly is my proud to be who I am.
Heard this morning's shouting of "nothing to do with you".
My response:
This is obviously organized to block me from any human social activities, the participants are either obviously so despised or from the personal preferences, the organizers' intention is so obviously to exclude with the proud God tone of "You are Not Allowed".
This trend has been since 2015 from the British Royals and carried on by American rich to educate the world audience, I assume.
So, To all my readers, I write interweb-ly:
To the assumption, I reply politely:
Well, I am an American wealthy rich with my Chinese grandfather-Emperors' handsome blessing, so I am good with my own inherited.
Well, I am a Catholic who seldom practices my Catholicism, but I refuse to take any human as a living God to rule my life.
Well, I am willing to be with those who know who I am, I am willing to have nothing to do with those who never know a bit of who I am, and I am willing to respect those personal preferences.
To the intention, I express publicly:
I refuse to be thrown shit at to promote any pair of breasts that I have no desire to enjoy,
I refuse to be the victim of any breasts-appreciation presentation to belittle my own pair,
I refuse those who worship human original reproduction activities to take away my proud of my intelligence developed from the modern education.
To the expectation, I address proudly
All these matters, I take as my social expedition to be recognized for who I truly am.
All these matters, I take as my social preparation to be introduced for who I inherited am.
All these matters, I take as my social endeavor to be acknowledged for who I preference am.
I take all these matters are the law matters.
----July 9th, 2018
07-08-2018 It seems all about rational expression of cold maliciousness that anyone can hear from this morning's broadcasting.（今天早上播出的好像充斥的全是冷静理性表达的恶意敌意）
Heard this morning's "administrative order" to the social security（听说了今天早上的“管理令”）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I do not qualify for the social security help if I am not in the situation of being provided by my own wealth under entrusting via the social security. (如果不是因为我的信托是通过社会福利系统支付我生活费用的，我确实是不符合需要社会福利系统来帮助支付生活费用的标准。）
This is a true statement and this is the reason I have been constantly contacting the government's agencies regarding where is the paid-out providing from my own wealth.（这是事实，这也是我一直在联络各政府机关我的信托已支付款项在哪里的原因。）
Also, I am well-known to all government agencies, worldwide to be accurate, that I am the worldwide famous for being the major featured person of a worldwide popular radio program for over 10 years time. This certain means I am world famously can afford my borrowing of the U.S. social security's paying for my living expenses coverage once the legal situation of the radio program's payment cleared.（再说了，对于全世界的政府机构来说，我可能都是一个非常有名的热播超过10年的广播剧女主角。这当然也让我确定是个世界上都共知的还得起这些钱的人物，即一旦广播剧收入有关的法律状态结束，凭广播剧收入就肯定能还的起我向社会福利系统借用的救济贫穷标准的生活费用给付。）
I just don't know why this Mrs. Jessica R, the giver of this morning's "administrative order", is so agitated about my life? Exactly, what this Mrs. Jessica R could possibly compete about to have this constant agitation against me? To have a bigger name than Mrs. R?（我就是不明白今天早上这个“管理令”的发令人Jessica R夫人，她为什么就是对于我的生活如此激愤？究竟这个Jessica R夫人比着飙着的是什么，就是如此不停的对我找茬？是想要个比R夫人还响亮的名字？
Rumored this is the same Mrs. R who I have been complained about, the one who has been so impressive about her value of being a woman that the motherhood should mean "mothering anyone's sermons from the street" so that any matured woman deserves to do a DNA test with any adult whoever fancying to be mothered.（听说这就是同一个我一直在抱怨其对于女人价值是什么的观点很离谱的R夫人。似乎这个R夫人就是坚定认为一个成年女人要是当了妈就意味着她很有可能是被街上的任何一个给下的种，所以这个R夫人就是坚持强硬要求，只要是一个成年女人，就是应该满足任何一个想要有个妈的成年人做个DNA亲母子亲母女鉴定的要求。）
I refuse to be targeted as a victim of her constant harassment, so this is my response to this Mrs. Jessica R: A much bigger name than Mrs. R? Who might that be? The rumored infamous A.G. who has the "fame" of matching every prominent male to a leftover female from him? Well, I did hear some rumors about her as broadcasted this morning, a ridiculous rumor indeed, but a perfect match to the ridiculous herself is so true.（我拒绝成为被这个R夫人无休止骚扰的受害者，所以我对这个R夫人说：比R夫人还要响亮的名字？谁啊？那个传说中的臭名昭著的AG，就是那个让名门小子个个都娶个他自己啃过的剩饭菜的那个？确实，我也听说过今天早上播出的那个无稽传言，但这个传言的无稽程度和这个R夫人自己行为的无稽程度倒是挺般配的。）
But I have nothing to do with this A.G. other than being a victim of this A.G.'s possible criminal activities.（但我除了有可能是这个A.G.的一些有可能牵涉到是否已经刑事犯罪的一些行为的受害者之外，真是一点关系都没有啊。）
Oh, I got it, is it because I suppose to be the victim of "the pair" from her fantasy? Is it because I am already the victim of the possible attempted murder by A.G., this Jessica R is attempting to murder to make me the victim of hers as well to pair herself as "the pair of the attempted murders" with a much bigger name than Mrs. R, is that so? I refuse to be a victim of "the pair of the attempted murders".（我明白了，我应该是她幻想中“一对”的受害者？就因为我现在已经是A.G 试图谋杀的受害者，就应该也成为这个R夫人试图谋杀的受害者好让R夫人可以在“一对试图谋杀者”的称呼里可以和比R名字更响亮地A.G.成为一对，是这样么？我拒绝成为这“一对试图谋杀者”的任何意义上的受害人。
----July 8th, 2018
Heard the new definition of a relative from China（听说了今天早上来自中国的亲戚新定义）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I am traditional on the definition of what is a relative.（我对于亲戚的理解是遵循传统。）
I heard this morning's new definition is "Give me money to phone me a relative". So, I take it as the advice to save my phone bill.（我听说今天早上对亲戚的新定义是：“拿钱来再打电话给我说是个亲戚”，那我就当这是在让我省点电话费了。）
Also, this morning's saying of "tell me you have money when you have a stack on the table". But that will be the time when I mostly use credit cards or checks instead of cash in order not to hire a cash-footman. I only requested to have some cash to carry around. So, I say to you on this blog that I am lawfully a rich person who is not interested to show you a cash stack in the near or far future.（还有，今天早上所言，“等你能在桌上放上一叠钱之后，再和我说你有钱”。 但那个时候，我是依赖信用卡和支票来减少随身现金，否则就得找个跑腿的天天帮着我拎钱。我就只要求了准备一点现金让我可以随身携带。所以，我就在这个博客上和你说，我的钱都是符合法律的，我现在和今后都不会向你展示一叠叠的现金。）
Another one, A relative deserve to be cashed for the DNA resemblance. My answer is: I refuse to pay for the useless. （再来一个：做亲戚就应该按DNA鉴定结果付现金，我的回答就是：我拒绝花钱买无用。）
To the person who announced the intention to kill: You must be on law enforcement's close watch now. I refuse to be contacted by your any effort, I refuse my entire romantic family as well as my parents to be contacted by your any effort. You are not an in-law to me according to the People's Republic of China's marriage laws. You are never a biological relative to my biological children.（给那个宣布说杀我是不会犹豫的：你一定已经被执法机关给盯上了。我拒绝你任何企图与我取得联系的努力。我拒绝你任何企图和我的婚恋家庭的任何成员取得任何联系的任何努力。按照中国的婚姻法，你从来就不是我的任何亲戚， 你也从来就不是我亲生孩子的任何血缘亲戚。）
----July 8th, 2018
07-07-2018 I have inherited Trust entities, and I have intellectual Income （我有继承信托，我也有智慧产权收入）
Heard this morning's talk about diplomats' argument（听说了今天早上的外交官争论）.
My response:
Well, as long as my claim that I am the British East Company's Financier is according to laws which are beyond the Constitution itself, the Justice Department will serve the Foreign Department on the argument as the law matter authority.（我的回应：只要我宣称我是英国东印度公司的财经人是根据法律而且是超越了宪法所赋予的言论自由的范围，司法部就会作为法律事物的权威机构而向外交部提供与争论相关的法务服务。）
It is lawful for me to claim I am truly the British East India company's Financier because the Trust entity I inherited has been its up-stream investor. （我宣称我真真实实是英国东印度公司的财经人是合法的，就因为我所继承的信托一直是其上游投资机构。）
----July 6th, 2018
----July 7th, 2018
Heard this morning's agitation from Boston Chinese community（听说了今天早上所提的波士顿中国城的激愤）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I heard the agitated is an in-law to the investors of the Boston C-Mart Chinese Supermarket chain (波士顿中国超市连锁). I heard the husband is mothered by a Miss Yu （于）from Shanghai area.（我听说今天早上特别激愤的那个是波士顿中国超市连锁的一个姻亲，听说当丈夫的是由上海地区来的一个于家小姐所生的。）
I take the intention is obviously to cut off my possible financial help from the U.S. Government based on the effort to completely ignore the known fact in Boston Chinese community that this is the same radio program which I world-known for being the major featured person for its over 10 years worldwide broadcasting, also the effort is to completely ignore the fact that the United States is a lawful country which equipped with labor laws as well as intellectual laws that my contributions to this radio program's success as the major featured person should have been protected by the U.S. laws.（我认为这激愤的目的就是要掐断由美国政府提供给我的财务帮助，这是基于完全无视我本人就是这同一部广播剧超过0年全世界热播的女主角的一份尝试，这是基于完全无视美国是个有劳工法和智慧产权法的法治国家会提供保护我对广播剧贡献的一份尝试。）
I take all these Boston Chinese community's ridiculous agitations regarding my welfare level benefits, which are based on this intentionally to be ignorant efforts, are purposed to trash me to promote themselves which I call it a legal situation that may be a hate crime severe.（我认为波士顿华裔社区就我能拿到由美国政府提供的低水平救济福利的这份莫名其妙的激愤，也就是基于有意装无知来愤怒的这份努力，目的就是来踩跺我方敏以拔高他们自己，我是将此归类为有可能是严重到类似仇恨犯罪的法律问题。）
Exactly when I will have my income from the radio company to be realized in my named-ID accessible bank account, I say I am not the authority to have the answer but I know I am helped. My complaint has been under investigation. I won't be concerned to shop in C-Mart as well.（究竟什么时候我才能在我自己能拿到的钱的银行账户里看到我的广播剧收入，我还真不是可以给答案的权威，但我已经被法律所保护，我的投诉也已经被调查。我也不会担心我该如何去波士顿的中国超市买菜。）
----July 7th, 2018
Heard the confusion why I deserve this radio program's major featured person fee （听说了凭什么我拿主要角色费的疑问）.
My response: （我的回应：）
This radio program's commercial broadcasting my life experiences stories from myself's own creation is the reason I deserve the major featured person fee.（这个广播剧的商业播出我自己创作的我的人生经历故事是我凭什么该拿广播剧主要角色费的原因。)
The major-featured-person fee and producing fee are both intellectual income. I did not participate in any producing efforts is the reason I share half-half with the producing team. The major featured person's share can be over 75% if participating in producing efforts while the producing team gets 25%.（主要角色费和制作费都是智慧产权收入。我没有参与任何制作努力是我和制作团队对半分的原因。如果参与制作，主要角色费所占比例可高达75%左右而制作团队只拿25%。）
The difference between the radio program's producing team and a fiction writer is the producing team reports my life stories as reality shows while a fiction writer writes own made-up stories based on original using made-up names but not reporting, the original personnel is unidentifiable and fiction stories are commonly understood as not real.（这个广播剧的制作团队和文学小说作家的区别就是，广播剧制作组是报道我的人生真实故事来制作真实剧，而一部小说的作家根据人物事件原型来编造小说人物名字从而进行创作来编造小说故事情节，原型人物在小说中已不可识别，小说故事情节被公众认可为既不是真实人物也不是真实事件报道而是虚拟文学创作。）
The difference between business idea's creator and the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising creative team and the advertising producing team. The creative business idea needs to be approved by the in-interest company, similar to advertising creative team's idea need to be approved by the advertising client, the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising producing team.（生意创意和公司生意执行团队的区别就像是广告创意团队和广告制作团队的区别。生意创意是需要对创意有兴趣企业的批准，就像是广告创意团队的创意是需要广告客户批准的一样，而公司生意执行团队就像广告制作团队一样。）
Be the identifiable truthful person, I have never been willing to be made-up upon or patch up upon fake or unreal stories of my life is the reason I have been constantly calling law enforcement's help on this radio program's sexual harassment efforts and public-harming my name efforts.（作为在现实生活中可辩别可识的真实人物，我从不愿意被人编造及编辑虚假不真实的所谓人生故事是我不停的就广播剧对我实施严重性骚扰并恶意故意破坏我方敏名誉而报警的原因。）
So far, I have been the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's illegal transferring out of my intellectual income, the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's organized severe sexual harassment since 2015, etc.（到目前为止，按照美国刑法，我是被广播剧非法转出我的智慧产权收入的受害人，从2015年起被广播剧重度性骚扰的受害人，等等。）
---- original published on July 1st of 2018
----July 7th, 2018
07-06-2018 It is lawful for me to claim I am truly the British East India company's Financier（我宣称我真真实实是英国东印度公司的财经人是合法的）
Heard this morning's anger from the China and Chinese communities abroad（听说了今天早上中国和海外华裔社区的愤怒表达）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I heard this morning's anger outburst is triggered by the verification that I am truly the British East India company's financier, but the anger is not actually about why I am the sole beneficiary person or why me, the anger may be is about the frustration related to a Mr. D. R.（我听说今天早上的愤怒爆发是因为确认了我确实是英国东印度公司的财经人，但这愤怒并不是针对为什么是我或者为什么我是唯一受益人，今天早上的愤怒好像是和一个D.R.先生有关。）
If the frustration is related to a Mr. D. R, well, I have nothing to do with any Mr. D. R is all I can clarify.（如果今天早上的那份倍受挫折的感觉是因一个D.R.先生而起，我就只需要澄清我从未和任何一个D.R.先生有关任何关系。）
If the frustration is about why me, I have to say I have explained all this time that I am the birthmark heir of my upstream line-of-grandfathers is the reason for why me. I am the sole beneficiary person is specified by the Trust entity's settler grandfather in his entrusting letter.（如果这份挫折感是出自为什么是我，我只能说我已经解释到现在了我是我这一支爷爷们的胎记继承人所以是我继承，我是唯一受益人是由信托的委托人爷爷在其设立信托的委托书里指定的。）
It is lawful for me to claim I am truly the British East India company's Financier because the Trust entity I inherited has been its up-stream investor. （我宣称我真真实实是英国东印度公司的财经人是合法的，就因为我所继承的信托一直是其上游投资机构。）
----July 6th, 2018
Heard there is at least one girl in Britain（听说今天早上提到有这么一个女孩）.
My response: （我的回应：）
I heard that girl mentioned in this morning's broadcasting is the announced daughter of the current Chinese Premier from a Chinese female diplomat broadcasted in the radio program. I have nothing to do with this girl's both announced parents, I have nothing to do with this girl's biological origin.（我听说今天早上提到的女孩其实是广播剧里所宣布的中国现任总理和一个中国女外交官所育的女儿。我和这个女孩的双亲没有任何关系，我和这个女孩没有任何血缘关系。）
Also, there is saying the girl mentioned this morning resembles me very much, I say this may be the same girl whose video was published in 2012, I have acknowledged the 2012-published girl and her rumored brother as the most likely my biological daughter & son. I am waiting for the private confirmation from my own entrusting attorneys to be a confirmed happy mother.（还有说今天早上提到的其实是一个和我长得很像的女孩，我说那这个女孩可能就是2012年有发布过录影资料的那一个。我是已经公开认可2012年所公布的女孩及她的兄弟很有可能是我的亲生子女。等到我的信托律师可以有条件就此私下向我确认之后，我就可以做一个经过证实的快乐妈妈了。）
I refuse this girl to be harassed by anyone for any reason. (我拒绝这个女孩被任何人以任何理由而骚扰。)
It is understood only psycho who refuses to acknowledge being a mother does not mean the ownership of all human sperms, nor means the only recipient of all sperms from the same family name.（只要花痴才会拒绝承认一个女人当了妈之后既不意味着这女人就此占尽了天下所有男人的精子，也不意味着这女人是同一个大家族所有精子的唯一受体。）
----July 6th, 2018
07-05-2018 I am truly really the British East India Company's Financier.（我确实是真真实实的英国东印度公司财经人）
Heard this morning's clarification on the British East India Company Financer（听说了今天早上澄清了谁是英国东印度公司财经人.）
My response:（我的回应：）
I am proud to be the requestor of a French Name which means "Min is so Pretty" for me to be introduced as the French named authentic British East India Company Financier according to the French customary saying. （我要求给我取个法国名字，字面意思就是“方敏真是漂亮啊”，我很骄傲我有需要用这名字来按照法国说法来介绍我自己是个正正宗宗的有着法国名字的英国东印度公司财经人。）
I acknowledge the British Crown Prince's saying "Not pretty at all" is commonly respected by my frankly realistically honest fellow American citizens as "Just not pretty yet".（我承认英国王储所言“一点都不漂亮”确实是广泛的被我坦率实际又诚实的美国同胞们所尊敬为“也就是还没漂亮而已啦”。）
I am willing to be in my most pretty British dresses, carrying my slightly Chinese accented American English, to express my doubts on what is worldwide acknowledged as "Young and Handsome", with the hard evidence from my private collection of the all possible great moments that never-wanted-me the British Crown Prince has not been known to all my social dealings.（我愿意穿着我最美的英国服饰，用我轻微中国口音的美式英语，来表达我是如何的怀疑那全世界都认可的”年轻英俊”，我会向我的社交好友呈现我的私有收藏作为我所表达观点的事实依据，也就是我所能收集到的那个"从来就没要过我的”英国王储那些不为众所周知的所有美妙瞬间留影。）
I promise I will never be a friend to whoever has ever romantically involved with the world-known my heart-theft British.（我保证我永远不和那些曾经被我那举世闻名的偷心英国人爱恋过的人做什么朋友。）
This British East India Company's Financier company ( a French company) has been the investor to the American "O' Confusion Fund" company(英国东印度公司财经人公司（一家法国公司）一直都是美国"O家困扰”基金公司的投资公司)
I am truly really the British East India Company's Financier.（我确实是真真实实的英国东印度公司财经人）
----July 5th, 2018
04-22-2018 没有了你们永远都不意味着失去。
06-26-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设
给任何够资格在大众广播频道上扯着嗓门向我要钱的人：
1：
2：
3：
4： 请出示我方敏必须按照中国法律和美国法律必须归还本应由你及你的
5：请注意，按照中国法律和美国法律对财产继承的定义，继承从被
6：我是从2004年6月30日开始宣称继承了钱财，
7： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
请参阅：
给所有整天就忙着抢屌抢钱的：
你们不用天天以组织演出漫骂方敏为借口来找机会舔有钱人的屌讨你自己的舔屌钱。继承从来都是收到了死人留下来的钱，
07-04-2018 Why China and Chinese community are so angry regarding the ownership of a 400 years old British investment in America?（为什么是中国及华裔社区对一家美国营运400年的英国投资所有权争议如此愤怒？）
Heard this morning's anger of "How dare She is talking about the O's confusion company again."(听说今天早上所谈“她居然又在说那O家的困扰公司啦？”）
My response:（我的回应：）
Of course, I would if I see I need to. I am proud the Trust entity I inherited in 2004 has been this great American company's upstream investor. （我当然会阿，只要我觉得需要只要我想谈。我很骄傲我所继承的信托是这家公司的上游投资机构啊。）
O'Connor's families have been associated with the American Fund company since the first Attorney O'Connor migrated to America from Britain and took the counselor's position offered by this American Fund company over 200 years ago. Ever since then, this first immigrant Attorney O'Connor's offspring have been greatly associated with this American Fund company's business operation for over 200 years which was the reason for O's family confusion regarding the company's ownership.（自从O家的第一代美国移民O‘Connor律师从英国来美国后接受了这家英国在美国的投资公司所提供的公司法律顾问的职务后，这个第一代移民O‘Connor律师的后人从那时起就和这家美国公司的业务经营活动有了超过200年的紧密联系，这是造成O家后人对公司所有权困扰的原因。）
I was confused because I did not know what I inherited is a Trust entity that has been invested in this American Fund company, the O'Connor's confusion about the company's ownership triggered my anxiety which was the reason of my public emotional argument on this American Fund company's ownership. I have never associated with this American Fund company's business operation. （我的困扰是源自我不清楚我所继承的其实是个信托公司，是我所继承的信托公司投资了这个美国基金公司。O家对公司所有权的困扰引发我的惊愕造成了我就这个美国基金公司所有权的所发表的公开及非常情绪化的陈述。我从未参与这家美国基金公司的任何业务活动。）
This American Fund company's upstream investor entity, the Trust entity I inherited in 2004, was set up by an ancient grandfather of mine between 1200AD to 1400AD. I am the sole beneficiary person specified in the settler's letter.（这家美国基金公司的上游投资机构，是我一个公元1200-1400年间的祖爷爷为我所设立的信托。我是作为这个信托的设立人在其委托书里指定的唯一受益人在2004年继承了这个信托。）
I heard this morning another Shanghai investment associated with this American Fund company expressed the Shanghai investment could provide for me as well but only upon its investor company's instruction. This American Fund company would instruct Shanghai investment if it receives its Brtish investor company's instruction to provide for me from Shanghai. I appreciate this understanding. Thanks.（我听说今天早上又有一家上海投资企业表态只要接到其上级投资公司的指示，上海投资企业也会按照其投资公司的要求支付我私人使用所需费用。这家美国基金公司如果接到其上级英国投资公司的指示由上海支付我的私人使用费用，这家美国基金公司是会通知其上海所投资的企业的。非常感谢上海方面对此的理解。）
I have been asking this question since my public emotional argument time in 2015-2016 on Boston's 96.9FM, why Chinese community abroad and the Chinese government are so angry about me stating this American Fund company is an investment.（自2015-2016年我在波士顿的96.9FM广播电台上就这家公司的所有权做公开及非常情绪化的陈述时，我就一直在问这个问题，为什么是华裔社区及中国政府对我方敏就这家美国基金公司所有权所做的陈述如此愤怒？）
This is an over 400 years old American company that has been registered to its British investor company the entire 400 years time include 200 years in the United States' government record, not register under my name nor O'Connor's.（这是一家已经营运400多年的美国公司，在过去400多年里，其工商局的法人登记就一直是其英国投资公司在美国的分公司，其中有两百来年这个公司法人登记的记录是在美国政府的档案库里，既没登记在我名下，也没登记在O'Connor名下。）
I have become a U.S citizen since June of 2015, why it is Chinese community and the Chinese government don't allow me to state my argument? This morning's anger is also from the Chinese community abroad and from the People's Republic of China, what legal grounds do they have to be this angry? Or what their confusion could possibly be on this ownership matter which should be law matter that they got nothing to do with?（我是自2015年6月成为美国公民的，为什么是华裔社区及中国政府不准我就公司的所有权发表我自己的陈述？今天早上的这个愤怒也是来自华裔社区及中华人民共和国的，他们凭什么法律依据可以如此愤怒？这个公司的所有权困扰是个美国的法律问题，又是和他们这些华裔华人一丁点关系都没有的一家公司的所有权问题，他们能有什么困扰让他们如此愤怒？）
This Chinese community's anger only towards this O's confusion American company's ownership, not towards the American "Pejoves" fund, nor other published American Funds as well.（这份来自华裔社区的愤怒就只针对这O家困扰美国基金公司，没有针对美国“Pejoves”基金公司，也不针对其他几个已经公开的美国基金公司。）
Without this Chinese community's ridiculous anger, I wouldn't be so emotional to express the arguments of my confusion publicly on the Boston radio in 2015-2016 time.（没有这份来自华裔社区的愤怒，我2015-2016年在波士顿广播上的陈述也不会情绪那么激动。）
Regarding the rumor of $5Billion rewarding commission of this American Fund company's "ownership successfully transferred", I have to be very honest say this so-called "ownership successfully transferred because of the radio program broadcasting" never happened, as the final clarification you already heard from the British investor company on the same radio program. This American O'Confusion Fund company is still registered as its British Investor's American Investment, as it has been in the past 400 years time. There's no such $5 Billion such commission.（至于那个“酬谢广播剧的播出成功的让公司换了主人的50亿美金的酬谢奖金"传言，我必须非常诚实的说这个所谓的”通过广播剧的一顿故事编造及一番广而告之的播出，就可以轻轻松松不花一分钱就让一家千亿美金的美国大基金公司随便换了个主人"的说法其实是从来就没有发生过的事情，这是听众已经听到的由这家美国基金公司的英国投资公司在同一个广播剧上已经澄清的事实。这家美国基金公司现在也还是合法登记为其英国投资公司的美国分公司，就象过去400年来一样。就不可能会有这么一份50亿美金的所谓奖金。）
----July 4th, 2018
07-03-2018 I am the one Born With the $10,000 and I am the one Inherited (我才是生下来就有了一万美金的，我才是已经继承了的。）
Somehow, Yu's families consider themselves the similar as O'Connors or "Amusing Incident" stories. (于家好像认为他们是和O家及”乌龙事件”家里是一样的）
My response: This is an untrue statement. （我的回应：这是错误认知。）
For example, the O'Connor's confusion that made me screamed. There were two consecutive generation Mr. O'Connors worked for that Amercian "O's confusion" company as General Counselor, the second generation quit the job to became Senator of the United States to run a no-pay public office was the reason the American "O's confusion" company agreed to provide to support to contribute to the United States public services. The O'Connor family later greatly contributed to the American "O's confusion" company to win the railroad deal from other foreign companies was the reason for O' confusion when the company has to stop this agreed-upon-providing according to the United States laws. What O'Connor families had received was agreed-upon-providing from the American "O's confusion" company, O'Connor families contributions have been acknowledged and reflected in the increased amount of the agreed-upon-providing. （举个例子，就是让我曾经吼个不停的O家困扰。O家有两代连着做那"O家困扰"公司的总律师，第二代辞职去做了没有工资可以拿的美国参议员，因为公司愿意支持O家效力美国为大众服务，所以O家才有了每年由公司支付的“同意给付”费用支付。后来O家为这美国“O家困扰”公司打败其他外国公司赢得美国兴建铁路的合同作出了贡献，造成了现在O家对于公司按照美国法律必须停止“同意给付”而困扰不已。O家对美国“O家困扰”公司的贡献是被公司所认可的也已经体现在“同意给付”的增值里的。）
According to the United States tax laws, the American companies don't have the freedom to use any company's resources to pay for private usage unless paid from the owner's account. Britain and France, etc. all have similar tax laws. American confused families and clarification of their historic confusion are the reasons for the delayed stop-providing. (按照美国税法，美国的公司没有支付私用开支的自由，除非开支是由股东账户（东家账户）支付。英国法国等等都有类似税法。美国困扰的家庭以及澄清他们因为历史而造成的困扰是公司按照法律必须停止供给被延迟的原因。）
----July 3rd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about "born with $9,000"（听说了今天早上提到了“生下来就有的9000美金）.
My response:（我的回应：）
I am the one Born With $9000 minus the delivery service charge from Shanghai to Nanjing, never any Yu's offspring. Yu's offspring born with detention crime.（我才是生下来就有9000美金的那一个，不过总额得减去上海到南京运费。于家后人从来就不是生下来就有钱的，于家后人是生下来就有非法扣押款项的刑事罪名才是真实。）
Yu's family's role in this $9000 story was a DHL or FedEx (UPS) office in China which had shared the residential property (private assistant Yu's apartment) as the package receiving and pick-up office. Yu's family just never delivered the package of $9000 nor informed the recipient who should be me nor my legal guardian( my parents). （于家在这个9000美金的事件中就像是敦豪航空货运公司DHL， 联邦快递FedEx，联合包裹服务公司UPS 在中国的设立的办事处，（也就是国内的网购快递之类的），用的是于姓私人助理的住家作为包裹收发办事处。于家从未送出这9000美金的包裹，也从未通知我方敏或者我的法律扶养人（我的父母）。）
As you heard it was clarified this $10,000 was first-time wired from the American company to Hongkong on July 22nd of 1967 (I was born on July 20th, 1967), wait for a week in Hong Kong for Chinese government's approval to be sent in. The approval was on July 31st of 1967 in the meeting, as you heard the clarification broadcasted on June 25th of 2018, that Chinese Premier Zhou did not against the delivery of this $10,000 at all. I heard the first-ever wire of this $10,000 had my name in Chinese（方敏) on the American wire request form, and the Chinese central government's approval-discussion also mentioned me as Little Min who is Fang-Wenhai's daughter. （就像你所听到的，第一笔美国公司汇出的1万美金是1967年7月22日已经电汇到达香港（我是1967年7月20日出生），在香港等了一个星期左右，等待中国政府的批准进入中国境内。中国政府是1967年7月31日开会讨论批准进入，就是周恩来总理没有对一万元表达反对意见的那次会议，这是2018年6月25日的广播剧所播出内容。我听说美国公司这第一笔电汇所填写的电汇表格上，我方敏的名字是中文书写。中国政府在一万美金批准进入的讨论中也是以方文海的女儿小敏称呼我。)
Hong Kong wire-recipient bank charged $1000 service fee to deliver it to Shanghai. Private assistant Yu's family suppose to continue the delivery to Nanjing to my parents or inform my parent to pick it up, Yu's family did neither. I have not heard the story of delivering from Hong Kong to Shanghai yet, other than the delivery person, a Hong Kong-born from the marriage, was mothered by one of my grandfather's 1930 romances. The mother's brief youth time romance with my grandfather was featured in the broadcasting episode on January 28th of 2018, her maiden family is an in-law to private assistant Yu.（香港电汇收件银行收了$1000美金“送钱费”将钱送往上海。上海于姓私人助理应该继续将钱送往南京或者通知我的父母去上海取款，于家是既没送钱到南京也没通知我的父母去上海拿钱。我还没听说有关前从香港到上海的故事，就只知道送钱的人是于家亲戚，是我爷爷30年代谈过恋爱的一个文艺女孩在结婚后和他丈夫在香港生下的儿子。我爷爷和这个母亲的短暂恋情就是2018年1月28日广播剧所播出的内容。）
I believe the American company did not stop the wire was for the best interest of mine. （我相信美国公司未停止汇款是出于对我最大利益的考量。）
----July 3rd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about enrolling to a college in Boston（听说了今天早上提到转入波士顿一家大学）.
My response: I need to respond to this none of my business matter is because of the confusion if this featured female was introduced to me. I am a woman, I refuse this kind effort of introducing a woman to me.（我的回应：我需要回应这和我毫不相干的事情，就是因为这女性是不是已经介绍给了我。我是个女的，我拒绝这种向我介绍女人的尝试和努力。）
I have been tolerating these Senior-youth's not-behaving activities from the Rockefeller house as much as I could all this time. It has been impressive that David Petraeus kept-on high-pitched voice yelling as if something so huge had ever happened, I have been kept on "what is wrong with you, can you sit quietly for a minute" toned.（我是一直都在包容洛克菲勒家的这一群老少年疯狂族。你就看那David Petraeus, 天天就尖着个嗓门的干嚎好像发生了什么天大的事，我一直的口气就是：“你发的这是什么神经，能不能就安静坐个一分钟？”)
This has puzzled so many people what is going on, Well, this is the difference between the inherited and the inheritable group. I am the head of my house ever since the inheriting, all these noisy Rockefellers are the allowance-taker inheritable group, the kinder garden group. So, other than asking my attorneys to go to their Seniors to demand my money back, or shitting back when I am girly, well, I am a youth in age and soon will be much more pretty than .., So, I have been tolerating as much as I could. （这让人多人都很奇怪这是怎么回事啊。唉，这就是继承了当一家之主了的一群和还在大树底下乘凉的一群之间的区别。我是自继承那天起就成了我这一支的一家之主了，而所有这些又吵又闹的洛克菲勒都是一群还在拿零花钱用用的幼儿园一族。所以，除了让我的律师找他们家当家的把我的钱给拿回来，小姐脾气来了就一顿痛骂之外，和他们比起来，我毕竟年纪上还是很轻是事实，我又很快又会变得漂亮很多也是真实，所以啊，我是尽量容让了。）
They are just so annoying. By the way, I did call law enforcement's help as well.（他们真是很烦人。顺便提一句，我还报警求助了。）
*I just started inquiring if my entrusting attorneys have also paid-out my education expenses according to July 1st of 2004's decision. This pay-in-full won't be in any scholarship but I am not certain if it is paid to any college because I don't remember if I mentioned any school in particular. It is just pay-in-full to cover my advance education expense. My parents may have possible fund allocated as well. (我刚开始寻找是否我的信托律师已经按照2004年7于1日的决定支付我的教育费用。这笔全部付清教育费不可能以奖学金形式给我，但我记不清我当时有没有对某一特定学校感兴趣，所以我不知这笔”全部付清“是付给了学校还是其他地方，就只是一笔付清而已，我父母可能也是类似）。
----July 3rd, 2018
07-02-2018 Some clarification on rIdiculous confusions from Mr. D Rockefeller Sr's family
Heard this morning's talk about a Mr. D Rockefeller Sr.
My response: I heard Mr. D Rockefeller Sr. passed away in recent years so I will do my best to be respectful in explaining myself.
I:) I inherited my own deceased birth Chinese grandfathers' Trusts on June 30th of 2004.
- I inherited on June 30th of 2004 which was not the date when this Mr. D Rockefeller Sr, deceased. This Caucasian Mr. D Rockefeller Sr. was obviously never my own birth grandfather.
- What Mrs. Jessica Rockefeller inherited in 2007 did not include nor overlapping with what I inherited in 2004. This Scandinavian Jessica Rockefeller is obviously not fathered by any of my birth Chinese grandfathers nor my Chinese father.
- What I inherited were all clearly willed by settlers' letters written by my own birth Chinese grandfathers in Chinese, what I inherited were never unowned Trusts nor unknown about the sole beneficiary person.
II:) The only person I met and had the romantic flirting conversations from the Rockefeller house is David Petraeus.
- I never met this Mr. D Rockefeller Sr in person, so I don't know why whose romances are so agitated and confused.
- I never expect any money from this Mr. D Rockefeller Sr nor his family.
- No one from welfare departments in Boston or Massachusetts that I owe money to would have any expectation that Mr. D Rockefeller Sr would cover any of my living expenses in Boston of Massachusetts that I "owe" since 2013.
- Only payments made to the discussions about my living expenses on July 1st of 2004 would be understood as spending on me.
- Hot and popular Broadway shows such as orchestrated Company, and Tennesse, etc.,
- Popular movies such as "007 Quandrum", "007 Millenium", 3D movie Avatar, etc.
IV:) Mr. D Rockefeller Sr did not invest in this radio program because it started off as a very small project worth only $7Million U.S Dollar in investment that this $7Million has been the total investment amount since January 2005 till today, July 2nd, 2018.
V:) Unlike entertainment industry professional taking the willingness to invest as the opportunity to shine, I came from the technology background that investment only needed for manufacturing or service providing purpose, so I do not take business spending on profitable investment opportunities as a personal favor to me when I am not the person getting the profits nor the investment yields.
I do not appreciate Mr. D Rockefeller Sr. took my own investment opportunities of making my own money, I have been very polite not to complain and I despise the current efforts of this shitting me as if I owe.
V:) Unlike entertainment industry professional taking the willingness to invest as the opportunity to shine, I came from the technology background that investment only needed for manufacturing or service providing purpose, so I do not take business spending on profitable investment opportunities as a personal favor to me when I am not the person getting the profits nor the investment yields.
I do not appreciate Mr. D Rockefeller Sr. took my own investment opportunities of making my own money, I have been very polite not to complain and I despise the current efforts of this shitting me as if I owe.
VI:) I never asked Mr. D Rockefeller Sr. nor his family to invest in anything I desire because I intended to invest my own inherited money in them all, as I said on July 1st of 2004: "All projects based on my ideas would be my own investments." In all 2004's meetings, I never asked for the favor to invest and I never asked for incentive referral fees for investment opportunities I created.
----July 2nd, 2018
07-01-2018 According to the United States Criminal Laws, using radio program to conduct sexual harassment is criminal activities. (按照美国刑事法律，通过广播剧实施性骚扰是美国的刑事犯罪行为）
Heard this morning's talk about the Chinese culture of "don't let go".（听说了今天早上提到中国的”不让走文化”。）
Myt response: The culture of "Don't let go" basically means stuck-on sexual harassment which never has been a part of the Chinese culture I was brought up with. In Chinese, we call the breed of this so-called culture "花痴"(pron: hua-chi, self-imagined-sexual-attraction-maniac).（我的回应：这种“不让走文化”就是性骚扰加跟踪“， 这种所谓的文化从来不是我所熟悉的中国文化的一部分。在中国，这种所谓文化的传承者是被称为“花痴精神病”的。）
This entire time, I have been complaining this radio program's producing team has at least one such "花痴(hua-chi)" staff because of the efforts to push the concept of "No a chance you don't want this or that butts desperately".（我就一直在说这个广播剧的制作团队里至少有一个这种花痴制作人员，因为这个广播剧的制作主题一直以来就是“只要是个屁股，全世界的听众就没可能不馋的口水嗒嗒的". ）
你不用天天以组织演出或制作广播剧编造情节来替真正有钱有势人痛骂方敏为借口，来找机会让你自己有机会可以舔真正有钱有势人的屌，可以有机会讨一份你自己想要的舔真正有钱有势的屌钱，吃真正有钱有势人的肛门屎钱。(You don't need to organize this show or that promotion to patch up stories to shit me to please the rich in order to advantage yourself for your own purpose to get the opportunity to suck the rich to beg your own so desired penis-sucking & asshole-licking money.)
----originally published on June 26th, 2018
----July 1st of 2018
Heard the confusion why I deserve this radio program's major featured person fee （听说了凭什么我拿主要角色费的疑问）.
My response: （我的回应：）
This radio program's commercial broadcasting my life experiences stories from myself's own creation is the reason I deserve the major featured person fee.（这个广播剧的商业播出我自己创作的我的人生经历故事是我凭什么该拿广播剧主要角色费的原因。)（updated on July 7th, /2018)
The major-featured-person fee and producing fee are both intellectual income. I did not participate in any producing efforts is the reason I share half-half with the producing team. The major featured person's share can be over 75% if participating in producing efforts while the producing team gets 25%.（主要角色费和制作费都是智慧产权收入。我没有参与任何制作努力是我和制作团队对半分的原因。如果参与制作，主要角色费所占比例可高达75%左右而制作团队只拿25%。）
The difference between the radio program's producing team and a fiction writer is the producing team reports my life stories as reality shows while a fiction writer writes own made-up stories based on original using made-up names but not reporting, the original personnel is unidentifiable and fiction stories are commonly understood as not real.（这个广播剧的制作团队和文学小说作家的区别就是，广播剧制作组是报道我的人生真实故事来制作真实剧，而一部小说的作家根据人物事件原型来编造小说人物名字从而进行创作来编造小说故事情节，原型人物在小说中已不可识别，小说故事情节被公众认可为既不是真实人物也不是真实事件报道而是虚拟文学创作。）
The difference between business idea's creator and the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising creative team and the advertising producing team. The creative business idea needs to be approved by the in-interest company, similar to advertising creative team's idea need to be approved by the advertising client, the make-it-business team is similar to the advertising producing team.（生意创意和公司生意执行团队的区别就像是广告创意团队和广告制作团队的区别。生意创意是需要对创意有兴趣企业的批准，就像是广告创意团队的创意是需要广告客户批准的一样，而公司生意执行团队就像广告制作团队一样。）
Be the identifiable truthful person, I have never been willing to be made-up upon or patch up upon fake or unreal stories of my life is the reason I have been constantly calling law enforcement's help on this radio program's sexual harassment efforts and public-harming my name efforts.（作为在现实生活中可辩别可识的真实人物，我从不愿意被人编造及编辑虚假不真实的所谓人生故事是我不停的就广播剧对我实施严重性骚扰并恶意故意破坏我方敏名誉而报警的原因。）
So far, I have been the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's illegal transferring out of my intellectual income, the U.S criminal law's victim of this radio program's organized severe sexual harassment since 2015, etc.（到目前为止，按照美国刑法，我是被广播剧非法转出我的智慧产权收入的受害人，从2015年起被广播剧重度性骚扰的受害人，等等。）
----July 1st of 2018
06-30-2018 我对于家一些故事的不理解 （What I don't understand about Yu's families)
听说了今天早上所谈的于家。（Heard this morning's talk about Yu's families)
我的回应：我听说的是于家1964年已经开始查询我爷爷在香港的钱财藏在哪里，1965年已在想办法将我爷爷的上海财产转入于家自己名下，我爷爷在1965年时在上海报警是我父亲的弟妹们可以顺利拿到我爷爷的遗嘱所分配家产的原因。(My response: I heard Yu's family had been sniffing around where Hong Kong money had been in 1964 and intended to transfer my grandfather's Shanghai money into Yu's family's bank account. My grandfather called Shanghai law enforcement was the reason my father's siblings inherited their inheritable according to my grandfather's wills.)
我听说的是我爷爷1965年向上海警方报警时不承认这位于姓私人助理的妻子是我爷爷自己的骨肉血脉小孩。我听说我爷爷1965年在向上海警方报警时一字未提香港信托。我听说于姓私人助理是从我父亲弟妹处得知我爷爷有钱放在了香港。(I heard my grandfather denied his fatherhood to the wife of his private assistant Yu in his account to the Shanghai law enforcement and he did not mention Hong Kong money at all. I heard the private assistant Yu heard about Hong Kong money from my father's siblings.)
我最近听说，根据DNA鉴定，我爷爷的于姓私人助理和我曾祖父的于姓保镖是亲生父子关系（听说两人不是户籍父子关系）。(I heard recently that my grandfather's private assistant was the biological son of my great grandfather's security Yu by DNA test result. I heard they were not legally registered as the father and son.)
这些都是可以通过当年警方的档案及DNA鉴定予以核实的，所有材料的真伪也都是可以做司法鉴定的。(All these should be able to be verified by the police records as well as the DNA test results, and the authentication of the documents can certainly be verified by forensics.)
我就是不太明白这个于姓私人助理为什么会和我爷爷要钱，为什么会将我爷爷的钱全算成他自己的，闹到我爷爷要报警的地步，于姓私人助理是个拿工资受雇佣的私人助理，怎么会去想我爷爷的钱？就像现在这个美国公司的事情，于家不屑解释他们当年凭什么扣留了我的生活费用却一再高调强调他们就是应该继续拿钱，凭什么呀？(I just don't understand this: Being an employed private assistant, a work relationship person to my grandfather, why private assistant Yu would demand my grandfather's wealth? why this private assistant would consider my grandfather's wealth to be his own so seriously enough that prompted my grandfather called Shanghai law enforcement's help? Why would he feel so comfortable he should want my grandfather's wealth? Just like current American Fund company's story, Yu's families have no need at all to explain why they detained my providing but strongly argue with emphasis that they should continually receive good money to be provided by the American company, why is this?)
但我也听说了我母亲的结婚礼物就是在1966年时由这个于姓私人助理送到了南京，只是我母亲没有拿到而已。(But I also heard my mother's wedding gift was sent to Nanjing to my mother by this same private assistant Yu in 1966, my mother did not receive it because of other reasons.)
我听说的是：我奶奶因为食物造成不适是被于姓私人助理发现后送进医院的，据说于家认为我们一家应该就此永远感恩不尽，可我奶奶进了医院就再没回家而是在医院去世了，没因为被于姓私人助理发现就捡了一条命活着回家，我奶奶没有因为于姓私人助理而活着回家，我们家凭什么就因为于姓私人助理拿着工资做了他该做的一份工作就应该对于家永远感恩不尽啊？(What I heard is: My grandmother was discovered and sent to the hospital by this private assistant Yu when my grandmother got food related discomforts. I heard Yu's families think my grandmother's family should appreciate this permanently forever, but my grandmother did not survive the discomforts but died in the hospital. It was not like my grandmother survived because this private assistant found her on time, the truth was my grandmother never left the hospital but died there. Why my grandmother's family should appreciate private assistant Yu so greatly and so forever because he was the one found her and did his paid-job to send her to the hospital during his paid working-time?)
我听说的是：我曾祖父的故事也是这个情况，因食物造成不适，由当时拿着保镖工资的于姓保镖发现而送医或者是叫了医生，隔夜就去世了。凭什么说我们就欠了于家的？(What I heard is: My great-grandfather was a similar story that he got food related discomforts, and he was discovered by the security Yu, and either sent to the hospital or called in a doctor by security Yu during security Yu's paid shift. My great-grandfather died overnight or so. Why my family owes this Yu's family because of this?)
我听说的是：我爷爷在1948年在香港办理信托后，就把上海大部分的财产放在了我奶奶的名字下面，我奶奶一住院，我爷爷就赶紧把钱转回他自己名下结果我奶奶还是去世了。(What I heard is: After my grandfather set up the Hong Kong Trust, my grandfather transferred the majority of his wealth to my grandmother's name. When my grandmother was hospitalized, my grandfather hurried to transfer the wealth back to his own name but seems did not save my grandmother.)
我就是不明白啊。就像昨天在广播剧里，于家就是一副已经很不耐烦的口气，好像是我在无理取闹才硬要说钱是我的，是美国公司在蛮不讲理才坚持不给他们于家想要的美国钱，可他们于家和美国公司一点关联都没有的，于家从来就不是什么投资人也不是什么生意往来户，于家就是个什么都不是。怎么就这么凶啊？(I just don't understand any of this. Just like yesterday's broadcasting, Yu's families sound like they are so fed up with all these already. as if I am being so annoying to insist on stating that is my money, the American company has been so ridiculous insist on not to continue providing them the money, but Yu's families got nothing to do with the American company, not investing associated nor business associated, basically is not associated at all. Why this tone?)
我爷爷在香港所设立信托的委托书里所指定的唯一受益人是我父亲的胎记掌纹支所生的胎记掌纹女，我是1967年出生有着和我父亲一摸一样的双掌胎记掌纹的他的掌纹女，是我父亲所生所育的他的骨肉女，是我父亲靠他自己的工资收入辛苦养大的他的亲生女，我方敏是我父亲唯一的女儿，我爷爷的掌纹儿子所生所育的唯一掌纹女。(My grandfather's settler's letter of the Hong Kong Trust entity stated that the sole beneficiary person should be the female-palm from his eldest son Fang, Wenhai‘s (方文海） palm-line. I was born in 1967 with birthmarks on my both palms exactly the same after my father, I am my father's own blood, I am my father's own girl he had raised by his hard-earned own making, I am my father's only biological daughter, my grandfather's birthmark son's only female birthmark-palms.)
06-06-2018 Rumors I heard about my family
----2018年6月30日。
06-29-2018 My inherited is part of my wallet that is never subject to spy (我的钱包包括我所继承的，从来都是不容盯梢）
Heard this morning's talk about one Rockefeller family's money confusion.（听说了今天早上谈到有关一个洛克菲勒家庭的钱困扰）
My response: I have no idea how come it became confusion after I left the meeting of July 1st, 2004. （我的回应：我就是不明白怎么2004年7月1日会议后这花钱的事怎么就变成了R家困扰。）
I only authorized David Petraeus' wife Holly on July 1st of 2004 to keep an eye on if her husband would pay for my glass house cancer treatment because the decision was I would pay it myself and she was employed by the medical treatment provider system in 2004. The fact that I could self-pay for my medical expense which was "well-known very expensive in 2004" should mean she would have no need to keep an eye on my daily living expenses and I was either a homeless or living on welfare before my medical expenses were paid since October(or November) of 2014. She was never authorized to spy on my wallet and she is no longer authorized to keep an eye on my medical spending on glasshouse cancer treatment as David Petraeus announced.（我在2004年7月1日那天只授权了David Petraeus的老婆Holly看着我的脑控癌治疗费用账户以确定是不是她自己的丈夫在替我付钱，这是因为在这授权之前就已经决定了这治疗费用会由我自己支付而她本人2004年当时又在提供治疗的医疗系统上班。只要我有能力自己支付在2004年当时公认很昂贵的脑控癌治疗费用是事实，就意味着她就应该没有任何需要盯着我的生活费用给付，而且在2014年10月或者11月我的脑控癌治疗开始付费前，我要么是没钱的流浪汉要么靠美国政府的救济综援生活。她从来未被我授权盯着我的钱包，她现在也没有我的授权也不再可以盯着我的医疗给付了，就如今天早上David Petraeus所说明的一样。）
A Chinese female's self-claim to voluntary spying on my wallet on July 1st of 2004 was understood by me as prostituting effort which I never had (and never will have) a penis to be responsive. My irresponsiveness never meant authorization but meant I am a female who doesn't have a penis to respond. I have and I will continuingly report any effort on spying my wallet to the law enforcement. My Trust entities I lawfully inherited are part of my wallet that is not subject for anyone to spy. （还有一个华人女子在2004年7月日当天声称自愿盯着我的钱包，我的理解是这个女人是在卖淫而我根本就没有男睾具可以回应。我当时的没有任何回应从来不是默许授权而是因为我是个女人根本就没有男睾具可以竖起来回应回应。我已经就我的钱包被莫名其妙的盯梢而报警处理，我今后就此报警也永远不会犹豫。我所合法继承的这些信托从来都是我私人钱包的一部分也从来不容盯梢。）
The rumors that the Senior couples would pay for my financial demands are ridiculous. David Petraeus' family has no reason to pay for any of my financial demands. I have requested tons such demands to my own entrusting attorneys & accountants, but never to the Senior couples of the Petraeus' family. （有关长者夫妻应该会为我的财务要求付费的传言真是莫名其妙。David Petraeus的家里没有任何理由为我的任何财务要求付费。我确实是提出了一堆的财务要求，但都是向我自己的信托律师及会计师提出，从来不是向David Petraeus家里的长者夫妻提出。）
----June 29th, 2018
听说了于家强烈表达他们没有责任义务向我谈他们当年如何使用所扣押款项。（Heard Yu's families expressed their annoyedness strongly that they are not responsible to explain anything to me.)
我的回应：(My response:)
于家有责任义务向美国或者中国执法相关机构谈他们当年为何非法扣押我的生活费用给付及如何使用该款项， 我作为于家当年非法扣押生活费款项事件的受害人会实事求是的向美国执法机关说明 1：特殊年代， 2：时间久远。(Yu's families are responsible to explain to the law enforcement from the United States' or the People's Republic of China on why they illegally detained my living expenses providing and how they spent the detained money. Being the victim of their illegal detention of my living expense providing, I will truthfully explain to the law enforcement of the United States that 1: 1967 was the year of Chinese Red Guards culture revolution time, 2: It has been a long time and my growing up has been smooth.)
我需要强调于家扣押我的生活费用海外汇款从来不是于家的什么合法权利，也从来不是因为我爷爷方智仁或者我的曾祖父母（方智仁的父亲母亲）欠了他们于家什么。(I need to emphasize the detention of my living expenses providing has never been Yu's families' lawful rights nor their privileges, and it was never because of any debts owed by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren nor my from my great-grandparents (Fang, Zhiren's parents.)
我所听说的是：于姓私人助理的丈母娘和我爷爷方智仁从未有过任何恋爱关系，于姓私人助理的妻子也从来不是我爷爷的血脉骨肉。于姓私人助理是在我父亲方文海1949年当兵之后才成为我爷爷的私人助理的。 1961年时我爷爷支付于姓私人助理每月的工资是￥196.00元人民币。(What I have heard are: Private assistant' Yu's mother-in-law never had any romance with my grandfather Fang, Zhiren, private assistant Yu's wife was never my grandfather's own blood. Mr. Yu became my grandfather's private assistant was after my father joined the Chinese Army in 1949. The wage my grandfather paid to this private assistant Mr. Yu in 1961 was￥196.00 per month which was $196.00 because the exchange rate was $1 U.S.dollar = ￥1 RMB in 1961.)
我个人认为于家今天的表态是因为我昨天的博文强调了于家和该汇款美国公司没有任何关联后，这表态其实是于家想和该美国公司搭上关系的努力。当年的每笔汇款，从1967年7月第一笔汇款开始，都是通过香港中介银行转送往上海，直到1996年我离开中国后停止汇款，于家从不清楚汇款美国公司的任何情况,于家就只知道在1996年10月以后就再没收到过汇款。(My personal opinion, Yu's families expression today was because my blog article stated that they never had any association with the American company who wired the money, this expression was out of the efforts that intended to create a communication channel with the American company to have some association. All these wires had been through a Hong Kong media bank to redirect to Shanghai since the first wire in July of 1967 till the wire stopped immediately after I left China in October of 1996. Yu's families never knew anything about the wiring American company this entire time, Yu's families just knew there had been no wire after October of 1996.)
----2018年6月29日。
06-28-2018 Those no-money Fang's offspring should accuse their own grandfathers instead of swearing about me (那些没钱的方家后人应该去指责他们自己的爷爷而不是对我谩骂)
听说了今天早上方家后人对我的中文谩骂。(Heard this morning's swearing from Fang's offspring)
我的回应：哪里来的这份愤怒？又不是他们家的爷爷当年没有分到家产。他们家爷爷把钱都给花光了，赌钱赌光了，玩女人玩光了，关我什么事？我所继承的是信托也就是格外给我的一份礼物而已，又没拿了一分一毫他们所分到的家产，把气撒我这里干嘛？(My response: Where this anger come from? It was never their own grandfathers did not get any share of the family inheritance. Their own grandfathers might have spent it all on women, or on gambling, etc. what this got to do with me at all? Trust entities I inherited are the gifts given to me, not a penny from their grandfathers' any share of inherited, why I am the one being blamed?)
从唐太宗李世民以第四子继承了他父亲唐高祖李渊的皇位开始，就已经是举世皆知我们家从来不是长子继承而是家族胎记掌纹继承。我的爷爷我的父亲和我这一支是我们家里的继承人一支，这是我爷爷方智仁把他大部分的钱都办了信托给我父亲的掌纹支所出的掌纹女儿（也就是我）的最主要原因。虽然我是我这一代的继承人，但方智仁爷爷1948年给我的信托，就象其他爷爷给我的一样，也还是给我的礼物。我爷爷方智仁1965年去世前给他所有子女的遗嘱是我爷爷方智仁所做的去世前的财务安排也就是分家产。直到去世，方智仁爷爷都从未更改他于1948年所立的信托委托书，方智仁爷爷1965年给他所有子女的所有遗嘱里也都没有更改信托意愿。(Since the Second Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong（唐太宗李世民）, the fourth son of his Emperor father, became the crown prince because of his palm-birthmarks, it has been historically well-known my family's inheriting rule is never the first-born son inheriting but the family birthmark inheriting. My grandfather, my father and I are the family's palm-birthmark heir line, this was the major reason my grandfather used most of his wealth to set up the Hong Kong Trust entity for me who is my father's palm-birthmark line's palm-birthmark daughter. Even though I am my generation heir of the family, but my Trust entity my grandfather set up for me in 1948 was still a gift to me from my grandfather, the same as my other upstream grandfathers' gifts to me. Before my grandfather Fang, Zhiren (方智仁) passed away in 1965, he had written his last will to each of his four children about his financial arrangement for each of his child which was the family inheriting of my grandfather's generation. Till his death, my grandfather never changed his settler's letter of the Hong Kong Trust entity he had set up, and he never mentioned this Hong Kong Trust entity in all his 1965 letters to all his children. )
我相信每一代爷爷去世前，都有给各房子女做好财务安排。我们家是一夫多妻家庭都已经有一两千年了，也一直都有母凭子贵母后娘娘皇太后的传统，家里确实都是一直只有一房二房称谓，从无大房偏房之称。我相信爷爷们在分家产时可能会有对这房那房孩子的一些特别偏爱，有继承人与非继承人的区别，但从来就没有什么所谓大房偏房的区别。(I tend to believe that when each generation of my grandfathers was about to leave this world, each of them had made financial arrangement for each of his children and each of his wife. My family has been polygamist marriage family for over 1000 years already, and the entire time my family has this tradition of privileges for the mother of the heir as the Mother of the King or Queen Mother, so my family always had the first wife, second wife but never a concubine wife. I would believe my grandfathers might have some favored this or that child from this or that wife, some difference between the heir-son and the non-heir sons when it comes to how to decide the shares of his wealth inheriting among his own children, but not out of if the mother was the first one married to him).
每一代做父亲的去世前，也都是给每一个孩子以及他所有孩子们的母亲做好安排，也从来都是各房拿各房自己的钱，年纪小的也都有办理一份信托等成年后再兑现，没听说有哪家没分到家产的。估计家里一直也都有所谓的如何分家产的祖规，大差不差的，所以每一代分家产的时候各房也都算是安静，从来就没听说家里有那一代有为了分家产而有哪一房闹得上吊跳崖的故事，怎么现在跑我这儿撒气来了？(At the time when each generation of my grandfathers about to leave this world, the financial arrangements always had been for all his wives and each of his children, it always had been each cluster of the children took their own shares with their mother's own share, young aged would have a Trust set up for him to cash when reaching the adult age, there never had any family stories about who did not get a penny. I assume my family may even have some inheriting-share-arrangement rules to apply since ancient time which must have been proven to be fair enough for each generation's inheriting. For the past over 1000 years' time, the family inheriting had been smooth without any family stories featuring which desperate wife did what dramatics with her entire or partial clan after "any unfair inheriting". Why all of sudden there is such angry against me from at least 4th-cousin away?)
我拿到的是礼物，就拿今天广播里所讲的这个信托来说吧，今天早上所提到的据说和美国“Pejoves”基金公司是同一个爷爷（南唐中主李璟）所设信托的投资， 南唐中主李璟爷爷在公元916年左右送给了我这份礼物，可我自己的父亲我自己的爷爷都统统没份分享，我所拿到的这份礼物哪里会和其他各代各房的子女有任何关系啊？我所继承的的信托都是我100%独自完全拥有的礼物。(What I inherited are gifts to me, such as the Trust entity featured in this morning's broadcasting which is the investor of this morning's mentioned company as well as the American "Pejoves" Fund company. this Trust entity was set up for me by the Southern Tang dynasty Emperor Lee, King ( or Li, Jing 李璟) in the year 916AD that even my father Fang, Wenhai (方文海）and my grandfather Fang, Zhiren (方智仁) don't have any share in it, how could this gift possibly have anything to do with any offspring from any generations' grandfather's other wives ? The Trust entities I have inherited are all 100% solely owned by myself.)
----2018年6月28日。
有说一些方家后人想打官司争取信托但没有遗嘱可以作为法律依据上法庭。(Heard there are some Fang's offspring intend to file lawsuits but no such Will can be the legal ground for them to do so.)
我的回应：确实如此。((My response: This is a true statement. )
因为这些信托从来都只是作为礼物为家里的胎记掌纹继承支的胎记掌纹继承女（也就是我）所设立，设立信托时的委托书从来都是给我这个唯一的受益人的，从来不是给任何其他方家后人的，连我自己的父亲爷爷也没有。我是这些信托的唯一受益人是由设立信托的爷爷们在信托委托书里所指定的也从未更改的，方家其他后人不可能有相关遗嘱。(It is because all these Trust entities are set up as gifts only to me who is the family palm-birthmark heir-daughter from the family palm-birthmark heirs' line as the specified the sole beneficiary person in each of these Trust entities' settlers' letters, each of these Trust entities was never intended to be a gift to anyone else even my own father and my grandfather. I have been the sole beneficiary person of each of these Trust entities by each's settler's letter which has never been changed ever since the set up of each of these Trust entities. None of those Fang's offspring could have such a Will.)
我没有拿方家其他后人的任何钱，我不会因为自己有收到爷爷给我的这些礼物就觉得亏欠了
方家的其他后人。每一代分家产时，方家血脉都有分到很体面的份额。(I did not take any money from other people's inheritable, and I won't feel as I owe anyone only because I got these gifts from my own birth grandfathers. All Fang's offspring of each generation had their own decent shares at their inheriting time.)
举个例子，国民政府时期的国民教育部当年筹资中央大学系统时的三代最大的捐款人的第一代，也就是我曽曾祖父这一代，我听说血缘传承的每一非继承子所分家产平均是10万大洋左右，也就是在1905-1920年期间，我曽曾祖父的每一非继承子是分到了30万的美金（如果汇率是1大洋=3美金）。这一份家产规模在当年就是足够在上海开一家银行的资本。我得强调血缘传承的非继承子，否则来一堆没父子血缘关系甚至没有任何血缘关系的扯着嗓门的叫唤没拿到钱。(For example, the first generation of the three generations biggest donors to the Education Department of the Republic of China for establishing Chinese colleges, my great-great-grandfather's generation, I heard each biological non-heir son's share averaged 100, 000 Silver Dollar which means the average size for each biological non-heir son of my great-great-grandfather was $300,000 U.S. Dollars if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S Dollar in the 1905-1920 time. This was the size that could open a bank in Shanghai at that time. I have the great need to emphasize this "biological non-heir son" to avoid myself from being yelled at "never" by those who are either not from this great-great-grandfather of mine or not even biologically associated.)
再比如我听说1965年我爷爷方智仁去世时给我父亲弟妹的每人一万元人民币，就是上海一个街道储蓄所的全部现金储备，也就是1965年的这一万元钱可以在上海开一家街道储蓄所了，如果当时一元大洋还是三元美金的汇率，这钱在美国可能也可以开一间类似街道储蓄所啦，方智仁爷爷给的也不差啊。（Another example, I heard the amount of ￥10,000 RMB that my grandfather Fang, Zhiren gave to each of my father's sibling in 1965, was the total amount of the cash reserve needed for a local bank's branch in Shanghai which means the ￥10,000 RBM my grandfather gave to each of my father's siblings was a good size to open a bank's branch in Shanghai in 1965, possibly in the United States as well if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S. dollar. )
每代都是如此，至于钱怎么处理，就是分到家产的子女自己决定的啦。现在没钱啦，就对我连吼代叫想从我收到的礼物里狠狠咬上一口，凭什么呀？我是坚决拒绝睬都不睬。再加上我父亲母亲在2004年后的经历，除了我自己父母，我是谁都不欠。(Each generation has been like this, how the young generation would spend this inherited money, of course, would be the young generation's own decision. So, now their offspring just swearing at me because they run out of their inherited money and expect to bit into my gifts? I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse. I don't owe anyone else other than my own parents after my parents' experiences since my inheriting of the gifts in 2004.)
我是真的不会理睬现在这些对我个人拿到礼物的谩骂而不指责他们自己爷爷的做法，这种做法真是莫名其妙的紧，岂有此理的很。(I truly won't listen to these swearing at me while their own grandfathers should be their accusation. This has been ridiculous enough and absurd enough.)
----2018年6月28日。
我相信每一代爷爷去世前，都有给各房子女做好财务安排。我们家是一夫多妻家庭都已经有一两千年了，也一直都有母凭子贵母后娘娘皇太后的传统，家里确实都是一直只有一房二房称谓，从无大房偏房之称。我相信爷爷们在分家产时可能会有对这房那房孩子的一些特别偏爱，有继承人与非继承人的区别，但从来就没有什么所谓大房偏房的区别。(I tend to believe that when each generation of my grandfathers was about to leave this world, each of them had made financial arrangement for each of his children and each of his wife. My family has been polygamist marriage family for over 1000 years already, and the entire time my family has this tradition of privileges for the mother of the heir as the Mother of the King or Queen Mother, so my family always had the first wife, second wife but never a concubine wife. I would believe my grandfathers might have some favored this or that child from this or that wife, some difference between the heir-son and the non-heir sons when it comes to how to decide the shares of his wealth inheriting among his own children, but not out of if the mother was the first one married to him).
每一代做父亲的去世前，也都是给每一个孩子以及他所有孩子们的母亲做好安排，也从来都是各房拿各房自己的钱，年纪小的也都有办理一份信托等成年后再兑现，没听说有哪家没分到家产的。估计家里一直也都有所谓的如何分家产的祖规，大差不差的，所以每一代分家产的时候各房也都算是安静，从来就没听说家里有那一代有为了分家产而有哪一房闹得上吊跳崖的故事，怎么现在跑我这儿撒气来了？(At the time when each generation of my grandfathers about to leave this world, the financial arrangements always had been for all his wives and each of his children, it always had been each cluster of the children took their own shares with their mother's own share, young aged would have a Trust set up for him to cash when reaching the adult age, there never had any family stories about who did not get a penny. I assume my family may even have some inheriting-share-arrangement rules to apply since ancient time which must have been proven to be fair enough for each generation's inheriting. For the past over 1000 years' time, the family inheriting had been smooth without any family stories featuring which desperate wife did what dramatics with her entire or partial clan after "any unfair inheriting". Why all of sudden there is such angry against me from at least 4th-cousin away?)
我拿到的是礼物，就拿今天广播里所讲的这个信托来说吧，今天早上所提到的据说和美国“Pejoves”基金公司是同一个爷爷（南唐中主李璟）所设信托的投资， 南唐中主李璟爷爷在公元916年左右送给了我这份礼物，可我自己的父亲我自己的爷爷都统统没份分享，我所拿到的这份礼物哪里会和其他各代各房的子女有任何关系啊？我所继承的的信托都是我100%独自完全拥有的礼物。(What I inherited are gifts to me, such as the Trust entity featured in this morning's broadcasting which is the investor of this morning's mentioned company as well as the American "Pejoves" Fund company. this Trust entity was set up for me by the Southern Tang dynasty Emperor Lee, King ( or Li, Jing 李璟) in the year 916AD that even my father Fang, Wenhai (方文海）and my grandfather Fang, Zhiren (方智仁) don't have any share in it, how could this gift possibly have anything to do with any offspring from any generations' grandfather's other wives ? The Trust entities I have inherited are all 100% solely owned by myself.)
----2018年6月28日。
有说一些方家后人想打官司争取信托但没有遗嘱可以作为法律依据上法庭。(Heard there are some Fang's offspring intend to file lawsuits but no such Will can be the legal ground for them to do so.)
我的回应：确实如此。((My response: This is a true statement. )
因为这些信托从来都只是作为礼物为家里的胎记掌纹继承支的胎记掌纹继承女（也就是我）所设立，设立信托时的委托书从来都是给我这个唯一的受益人的，从来不是给任何其他方家后人的，连我自己的父亲爷爷也没有。我是这些信托的唯一受益人是由设立信托的爷爷们在信托委托书里所指定的也从未更改的，方家其他后人不可能有相关遗嘱。(It is because all these Trust entities are set up as gifts only to me who is the family palm-birthmark heir-daughter from the family palm-birthmark heirs' line as the specified the sole beneficiary person in each of these Trust entities' settlers' letters, each of these Trust entities was never intended to be a gift to anyone else even my own father and my grandfather. I have been the sole beneficiary person of each of these Trust entities by each's settler's letter which has never been changed ever since the set up of each of these Trust entities. None of those Fang's offspring could have such a Will.)
我没有拿方家其他后人的任何钱，我不会因为自己有收到爷爷给我的这些礼物就觉得亏欠了
方家的其他后人。每一代分家产时，方家血脉都有分到很体面的份额。(I did not take any money from other people's inheritable, and I won't feel as I owe anyone only because I got these gifts from my own birth grandfathers. All Fang's offspring of each generation had their own decent shares at their inheriting time.)
举个例子，国民政府时期的国民教育部当年筹资中央大学系统时的三代最大的捐款人的第一代，也就是我曽曾祖父这一代，我听说血缘传承的每一非继承子所分家产平均是10万大洋左右，也就是在1905-1920年期间，我曽曾祖父的每一非继承子是分到了30万的美金（如果汇率是1大洋=3美金）。这一份家产规模在当年就是足够在上海开一家银行的资本。我得强调血缘传承的非继承子，否则来一堆没父子血缘关系甚至没有任何血缘关系的扯着嗓门的叫唤没拿到钱。(For example, the first generation of the three generations biggest donors to the Education Department of the Republic of China for establishing Chinese colleges, my great-great-grandfather's generation, I heard each biological non-heir son's share averaged 100, 000 Silver Dollar which means the average size for each biological non-heir son of my great-great-grandfather was $300,000 U.S. Dollars if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S Dollar in the 1905-1920 time. This was the size that could open a bank in Shanghai at that time. I have the great need to emphasize this "biological non-heir son" to avoid myself from being yelled at "never" by those who are either not from this great-great-grandfather of mine or not even biologically associated.)
再比如我听说1965年我爷爷方智仁去世时给我父亲弟妹的每人一万元人民币，就是上海一个街道储蓄所的全部现金储备，也就是1965年的这一万元钱可以在上海开一家街道储蓄所了，如果当时一元大洋还是三元美金的汇率，这钱在美国可能也可以开一间类似街道储蓄所啦，方智仁爷爷给的也不差啊。（Another example, I heard the amount of ￥10,000 RMB that my grandfather Fang, Zhiren gave to each of my father's sibling in 1965, was the total amount of the cash reserve needed for a local bank's branch in Shanghai which means the ￥10,000 RBM my grandfather gave to each of my father's siblings was a good size to open a bank's branch in Shanghai in 1965, possibly in the United States as well if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S. dollar. )
每代都是如此，至于钱怎么处理，就是分到家产的子女自己决定的啦。现在没钱啦，就对我连吼代叫想从我收到的礼物里狠狠咬上一口，凭什么呀？我是坚决拒绝睬都不睬。再加上我父亲母亲在2004年后的经历，除了我自己父母，我是谁都不欠。(Each generation has been like this, how the young generation would spend this inherited money, of course, would be the young generation's own decision. So, now their offspring just swearing at me because they run out of their inherited money and expect to bit into my gifts? I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse. I don't owe anyone else other than my own parents after my parents' experiences since my inheriting of the gifts in 2004.)
我是真的不会理睬现在这些对我个人拿到礼物的谩骂而不指责他们自己爷爷的做法，这种做法真是莫名其妙的紧，岂有此理的很。(I truly won't listen to these swearing at me while their own grandfathers should be their accusation. This has been ridiculous enough and absurd enough.)
----2018年6月28日。
06-27-2018 Laws are at work already, Just listen to the radio program (法律已经在工作，你就听广播剧吧）
Laws are at work already to ensure the freedom of speech does not mean confusing
(法律已经在工作：言论自由创作自由都不容混淆法律上的是非真相）
Heard this morning's talk of the confusion about tax laws. (听说了几天早上提到有关税法的困扰)
My response: I heard which certainly means may not be accurate, that according to the United States tax laws, the investor tax is paid when the money is transferring out of the investment for personal usage. So, it is lawful for a U.S. citizen investor not to reveal the total size or detailed size of any combination of investments as an investor. But by law, an investor needs to report the actual amount of the money being transferred out of the investment purpose at the same time of the transferring. (我的回应：我听说也就是说不一定准确啊，按照美国法律，投资人税是在投资款项被转出投资目的用于非投资目的时支付。所以，投资人是美国公民的话，是可以合法不公开投资综合及项目细节。但是按照法律，一个投资人必须在款项转出投资目的时如实汇报转出投资用途的款项数额。）
If so, what will happen if there is any unlawful investment activity? The law enforcement enforcing laws by tracking down who is the investor of the discovered unlawful activity. (那如果有非法投资活动哪？一旦发现非法活动，警方执法是倒追谁是该非法活动的投资人。）
My Trust entity has been registered as an entity for investment and I am a U.S. citizen, so it is lawful to refuse to reveal any investment activities of my Trust entity. （我的信托是注册为投资目的法人机构, 我又是美国公民，所以拒绝公开我的信托的投资活动是合法权利。）
I heard this morning's anger was because the insist-on request for a Spanish company's accounting information was from an American who is never associated to the Spanish company in any way.（我听说今天早上的愤怒是因为坚持要求西班牙的一家公司的提交该公司业务账目信息的这个美国人和西班牙的这家公司是一点关联都没有。）
----June 27th, 2018
Heard about this morning's confusion from the Mr. "Amusing Incident".（听说了今天早上还在困扰中的“乌龙事件”主角）
My response: It sounds like the Mister is still confused. It is not a surprise if you heard how confused some Miss Os and some Mister Os are, I heard they are still really confused.
（我的回应：听起来这先生还困扰着那。不过你要是听说了有几个O家先生O家小姐还在怎么样的多么的困扰着，你就一点都不觉得奇怪了。）
I heard the family confusion of Mr. "Amusing Incident" was clarified according to laws in the radio program for a four-days-time between June 7th of 2018 -June 10th of 2018, and June 11th-14th of 2018 broadcasting was the "freedom of speech" of what else has been confusing to them after the 4-days major clarification according to the laws. What you heard today is the impact of what else has been so confusing. It won't be surprising if there is something else still very confusing. Just listen to the radio program.
（我听说“乌龙”先生家的困扰在法律上的澄清是广播剧2018年6月7日-10日的四天的播出内容，2018年6月11日-14日是“乌龙先生”家里还在为什么而困扰的"言论自由的表达”，你今天听到的就是在那四天依据法律进行的大体上的事件澄清之后，这个"乌龙“先生还在困扰什么所造成的后果/。这当然是一点都不奇怪啊，听众就继续听广播剧的”下回分解”吧。）
I believe laws are already at work on the radio program's producing. Being the majorly impacted major-featured-person of this radio program, I did keep on calling law enforcement's help as well to make sure the radio program is reporting these types of important matters, not scripting nor patching-up and nor over-writing after the lawful clarification.
（我相信法律已经在进行广播剧制作相关的执法工作。作为受广播剧影响最大的广播剧主要人物，我也一直在报警求助警方保障广播剧是在就这些重要内容进行报道而非编纂编辑内容，或者试图事后改写依据法律所做的真相澄清。）
Freedom of speech, granted by the United States' Constitution, is the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint. Freedom of speech is the right to verbally express, never the right to verbally take over any format of any physically existing entity nor any financial valuables.（美国人的言论自由是由美国宪法赋予美国公民的权利。言论自由的权利是可以不受压制不受限制的用语言来表达的权力， 从来不是用语言来夺取合法被其他人所拥有的任何物质存在及任何财产财务的权利。）
06-07-2018 Amusing incident （乌龙事件）
----June 27th, 2018
听说了于家就是没法明白。（Heard Yu's families are so confused)
我的回应：我现在还在听究竟于家是个什么故事。(My response: I am still listening exactly what has been the story.)
于家认为他们当年可以把钱留下，该美国公司既没有追究也没停止付款，就已经表明了于家就是应该继续拿钱。Yu's families think the American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop wiring the money the entire time fully aware of Yu's families had kept all the wired money to themselves should mean granting Yu's families to own the money.
该美国公司其实对此已经说的很清楚. (The American company already clarified this clearly:)
- 这钱从1967年7月开始支付是汇给我方敏的，从来不是汇给于家的。(The wire started in the July of 1967 immediately after my birth, none of these Yu's families was the wire's intended recipient)
- 在我方敏1996年10月离开中国，公司向中国的此项汇款就立即停止了。(The wiring to China stopped immediately in October of 1996 when I left China to the United States.)
- 从1997年1月起，公司已经用我方敏的名字作为支付该每月1万美金的账务支付理由。(My name Min Fang has been booked as the reason for the $10,000 monthly check payment in the American company's accounting record since January of 1997)
- 是为了保障如果我方敏有需要紧急用款的情况下，公司可以通过中国政府协助在中国当地想办法尽快拿到钱款。我父母两人当时的工资一共只有40元左右，美国公司的汇款是每月一万美金。(It is to ensure if I would be in any kind of emergency, with the Chinese government's help, the company could reach out to get emergency funding locally. My parents' joint income was only about ￥40 ($40) per month when I was born. The wire was $10,000 per month)
- 在中美两国1967年没有建立外交关系的现实情况下，一切为了保障我方敏的最大利益。（It is for my best interest to do so when there was no diplomatic relationship between the United States and the People's Republic of China.)
- 在于家从未与该美国公司有过任何工作生意业务及其他任何关联是事实的情况下，在于家和该汇款美国公司也从来没有任何投资及被投资关联也是事实的情况下，于家要求该美国公司继续向于家付款实属莫名奇妙，于家这一莫名其妙的要求居然会由中国的这一届政府在支持更是离谱至极。(It is ridiculous for Yu's families to request the American company to continuingly providing money to them when it has been the truthful facts that none of Yu's families ever had any business association nor investing association with the American company, it is more absurd when this ridiculous request could be supported by this administration of the People's Republic of China.)
----2018年6月27日。
06-26-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
I, Min Fang, never against Chinese Communist Party's ruling over the land of China.
I, Min Fang, never against China to be a lawful country.
I, Min Fang, inherited Trusts from my own deceased birth grandfathers on June 30th of 2004.
I, Min Fang, never demand any living male's penis money, and I never receive any penis money nor voluntary compensation for any sort of abusiveness. It is well-known no-secret to the entertainment industry since July of 2004 that "there was never any prominent penis associate to this radio program" to confuse anyone as if I have been the major featured person from any penis business.
I, Min Fang, refuse to provide financial assistance specially &intentionally to anyone who is convicted by the Laws of the People's Republic of China.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any unauthorized person spend my money.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let anyone spend my own money against my own wish.
2004年已经继承了从来都是表明2004年就已经收了2004年时已经死了的死人留下来的钱，2004年已经
----originally published May 9th, 2018, updated on June 26th, 2018
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
我方敏从未反对中国共产党对中国960万平方公里土地的管理和统治权， 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
我方敏反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们共同利益相关的程虹作为提拔标准来选拔任用中国的国家及地区的领导者，我方敏反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们共同利益相关的程虹作为中华人民共和国的最高国家利益的唯一准则以及中华人民共和国法制权益的特别高级的拥有者。
我方敏从未在乎中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以及其他已经公开宣布的中国政府官员和他们所共同挚爱的程虹共居一室拥有他们自己的私人恋爱性生活或者一妻多夫的父母子女家庭生活，但我方敏坚决反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们和程虹的恋爱及性行为作为全面篡夺中华人民共和国的党政军权力及立法司法权力的原因和理由。
我方敏所投诉的一直就是我方敏在作为中国公民在海外生活期间以及我方敏在成为美国公民（2015年6月）以后被中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以中国国家政权以及中国政府资源所侵犯的中国公民合法权益（2015年6月前），我也已经向美国政府投诉我成为美国公民后被中国政府以中国国家政权所侵犯的美国公民合法权益。
我方敏坚决反对阻碍中华人民共和国法制建设的任何行为， 我方敏坚决拒绝特意向违反中华人民共和国法律的人士提供任何财务资助的任何企图。
----05-09-2018
任何够资格在大众广播频道上扯着嗓门向我要钱的人：
1：
2：
3：
4： 请出示我方敏必须按照中国法律和美国法律必须归还本应由你及你的
5：请注意，按照中国法律和美国法律对财产继承的定义，继承从被
6：我是从2004年6月30日开始宣称继承了钱财，
7： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
请参阅：
----最早发布于2018年5月23日。
06-25-2018 Chinese Premier Zhou and my $10, 000 monthly providing (中国的周恩来总理和我每月一万元的生活费用给付）
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese Premier Zhou.
My response: The reason why only one line of harsh saying "Premier Zhou is childless" was broadcasted is possibly to imply I am the similarly, but I do have my biological children.
I heard the producer of this line was Jessica O'Connor who mothers a Miss Ford, the 2013 presented girl who tends to fall into sleep holding her father's sleeve. The problem this Jessica O'Connor with me is the same problem a "Matilda Shimmel" has with me, but surely none of my business problem.
Jessica O'Connor has a daughter identically resembles another Miss Ford who is one of the four children broadcasted as all mothered by a British but a pair resembles the birth father's cousin. The confusion is the cousin don't resemble each other, the trick is they both partially resemble their great-great-great-great-great grandfather to the extreme.
So, whatever the birthfather's family have explained about the birth mother, this Jessica O'Connor just won't listen. I have screamed in my apartment a lot to say that my daughter, published in 2012, resembles me to the obvious, not her farther-side anyone nor O'Connor anyone. I hope someone can help her to get this.
----June 25th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到中国的周恩来总理和毛泽东主席开会的会议记录。
我的回应：
首先，
我实在是太荣幸了，周恩来总理和毛泽东主席他们两个是我最推崇的中国共产党人。我对他们的军事才华，文学功底甚至他们的书法都实在是太崇拜了。不过我不认同他们对1949年前还只是初级资本主义时期生产力还不发达的中国只需要大众一心就已经可以实现天下大同没有财富差别的这种理念，我认为“打土豪分田地”只是无为拆塔并不能促进创造与建设，聚沙成塔以拥有足够财力为人民为大众谋福利只需通过促进生产力以实现在税务法律法规管理下的应缴税基数提高就可以实现。
我自己的财产我自己管理就很好，永远不需要中国政府干涉我作为美国公民的合法私有财富。
其次，
我今天早上的原话是“周恩来是断子绝孙的，（他的观点再吓人都不会被认为是为了谋私利），你们现在是把中国的十三亿人民都当成是断子绝孙的”，你们才会认为别人都应该顶礼膜拜你们可以性交生孩子的能力，否则怎么才十三，十四岁的女孩不学好不务正业，满大街的可以到处屁股被人摸，又违反国家计划生育政策，才十几岁的初高中生在中学读书期间就未婚生了一个孩子，大学就读期间又生了两个让别人养着还没被按照中国国家政策退学，这些怎么成了你们中华人民共和国这一届政府所宣传的对中华人民共和国以及对13亿中国人民最大的贡献了？***现任国务院总理的老婆在读书期间生三个孩子，婚后三次足月怀孕只在医院产一女是海外传言。
我拒绝相信你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员。我拒绝你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员对我的敲诈勒索要求。我自己的财产我自己管理就很好。
我认为你们这些所谓的中国国家政府工作人员要是能把中国国库的钱也就是13亿中国人民的国库款项管理成为不是一个男女性交成果奖励金的金库，你们就已经是很好很有才华很清楚什么是人民的利益这么一群政府工作人员了。我确实是从心眼里认为你们根本就是一群娼妓院的娼妓加婊子养的才会认为中国十三亿人民的国库甚至我作为美国公民的合法私有财产是会为你们的性交乱操付费的。
第三：
至于为什么只播出那一句“断子绝孙”，那是为了影射我， 是因为一个Jessica O’Connor小姐（一个福特孩子妈）认定我女儿和她的女儿共一个爹，就因为她孩子爹有个堂兄弟的女儿和她的小孩长得像亲姊妹。2012年发表的我的女儿影视录像已经很明显呈现了她长得像我不像爹。那个女孩的亲爹也已经在广播剧上说明了那个女孩的亲妈是个英国女人。这个O家小姐似乎就是不准我有自己亲生小孩的意思，根本就是一个变态精神病类似。
第四，
就今天早上的毛周两个人的谈话内容是否和我有关，得看这是什么时候的谈话。那一万美金的生活费用是在中国政府同意后才由香港汇入中国， 中国政府知情是确定的。但我是这家公司的投资机构（信托）的唯一受益人这个事实只有在我出生后才能确定，所以这一万美金的生活费用汇入是在我1967年7月20日出生后才向中国政府提出的申请。
今天早上的广播剧据说是由周恩来的“私生子”在畅谈，说其实是周恩来不准这汇入的一万元钱归我方敏所拥有，说其实是因为周恩来想把这钱给他自己的“亲生孩子”，也就是说这是在由周恩来总理自己的“亲生孩子”通过广播剧来向全国世界人民公开说明周恩来总理从来就不是什么全心全意为人民的好总理而是个专谋私利的乌龟王八蛋。
我会认为周恩来确实会认为我一个小孩在他们心目中的理想国度里出生怎么还需要私人拥有财产而非公共拥有，这对于共产主义理想的不同理解也是美国和中国当时没有外交关系的原因，所以不足为奇。但我相信周恩来是不会认为别人把这一万元钱拿走作为私人使用就是应该的。
----2018年6月25日。
06-24-2018 Inheriting Tax && 究竟是文艺演出还是严重违法违宪活动？
Heard this morning's talk of my inheriting tax.
My response: Yes, my Trusts were not eligible for the estate tax (I was a foreigner inheriting foreign settlers' trusts), and Connecticut state I was a resident of was having tax free for AA type (grandparents-grandchild) inheriting on June 30th of 2004, so, this inheriting tax would be willingness-based inheriting tax paying.
I was told I could do this willingness-based tax paying on the inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004, but I was too excited that I could save inheriting tax so I answered happily: "why would I ever pay tax when I don't have to."
So, it is now.
----June 24th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到了就是要我付钱。
我的回应：我拒绝今天早上向我提出的要钱要求。我就是要提醒这个女的，我没有男睾具，不会觉得你说这些话很讨喜，就只觉得你很烦人很讨厌。
我现在真是很烦，整个所谓中国演出，根本就是编造故事以讹诈，欺诈和敲诈，并借此制造中国13亿人民对我方敏个人的误解不满以煽动针对我方敏个人的仇恨和敌视。
最著名的例子就是所谓的我欠了中国人民解放军军费一亿多人民币或者美金。最早这是一个文艺演出编纂的故事，说的是中国人民解放军的一个军人因工伤被送往美国军队予以治疗，然后就说要我付钱，但因是因公负伤，我又是美军退役军官（真实）在美国生活了已经20年，美军很清楚我和中国军方没有任何私人往来且没有任何法律依据应该由我付帐，所以在这个故事里，美军就把账单给了中国人民解放军，中国人民解放军也把帐给付了。结果，后续的所谓演出就变成了凭什么中国军费这么花费，就应该算成是我欠了中国人民解放军军费，并因此煽动了13亿中国人民就是要我还钱的呼声，你说这是文艺演出，还是制造仇恨事端以实施讹诈欺诈和敲诈勒索？
我破口痛骂中国政府从2015年开始有组织进行的文艺演出的原因就是因为所有这些文艺演出都是至少是涉嫌严重违法违宪侵犯我的法律权益及基本人权的行为。
这场所谓文艺演出的主题就是"你他妈的你以为你自己是谁?", 基本大纲就是只准痛骂我方敏是个单身女人独自生活就是个已经被事实证明了的没人要的东西，只准我方敏去捡垃圾否则不准有口饭吃，不准我方敏花我自己的钱，不准我方敏有我自己的生活，不准我方敏说话，就是不准，就是不准，就是不准。
这还是文艺演出啊？美国方面参与支持这个演出的的一些人也是被我向美国警方指控严重性骚扰及敲诈勒索谋财害命。
有人说我应该向中国政府解释就不会这样了。解释什么? 我是因为脑控癌没有隐私所以一个人在美国麻州波士顿生活，中国政府应该很清楚我是一个人生活且已经居住美国20年了，什么时候开始单身华裔女人就成了中国政府应该组织人力物力进行谩骂羞辱的？这届中国北京中央政府究竟是一个犯罪团伙的组织机构还是一个法制国家的政府啊？
我就是说这根本是一群北京老娼妓的做法，只要是条男睾具他们就是够资格闹吃醋，这不是一群街上的骚母狗根本实在弄不清这条那条男睾具根本就不是捅过了他们的那条，还能是什么呀？也可能他们是男睾具共用也就是共妻共睾主义，或者这条那条男睾具是个公用睾具，反正结果就是只要一个给捅过那是一群都够资格闹吃醋。我的结论就是这一群一伙的不是一群老娼妓就是一伙老黄脸老骚母狗给骚成了精神病黄脸老骚母狗。
至于说我花了R家很多钱就是该被他们家的女人痛骂并把我的钱拿光的说法，我的解释是我是2017上半年在波士顿96.9FM广播电台上时才听说R家认为我2004年7月1日花的是R家的钱且是未经许可并利用公共场合进行勒索，我对此的公开回应当时就已经是我方敏从来没有花过R家的钱，我方敏2004年7月1日花钱当时就没开口跟R家要过或者问一声R家愿不愿意为我花钱，我在花我自己刚继承的钱，我问R家干嘛？我事后就没打过一个电话给R家要求R家任何人支付我的生活费用，我方敏也从来就不知道R家的银行账号信息，怎么花R家的钱？ 更何况R家开的支票都是一些对娱乐业的投资项目像是百老汇歌舞剧以及街道医院等等，都是目前已知已经赚钱的投资。2004年7月1日那天非投资性的开销也就是我以及我的父母子女的医疗保安给付及我现在一直在找的我的生活费给付，都是我自己所继承的信托予以支付的开销。所谓我花了R家很多钱的误会目前都已经一切由我的律师予以处理了。可这和中国政府有什么关系啊？
还有一个误会，我是今年才听说，就是在2004年7月1日我快乐告知众人我继承了大笔财产时，有人好奇问我究竟是谁给我的钱，我回答说是我爷爷的，但我没被告知是那一代的爷爷，所以我当时就开始扳手指头数一数究竟可能是哪个爷爷，才数了5代爷爷，就被“勒令”停止，说我贪得无厌五个（男人）还不够，我当时就没闹明白，还傻傻回答“好像不太够”。那是，这些公司在美国就已经400年了，至少是十代以前的爷爷给我的。我就是因此被海外华裔社区骂了十几年的婊子破鞋，今年（2018年）才听说就因为我当时是在数手指头。我能解释什么？
----2018年6月24日。
06-23-2018 Boston's Park Street Church and 1989's Chinese students' movement
Heard about this morning's Boston's Park Street Church and 1989.
My response: Boston's Park Street Church is not a Catholic church, and I was never a patron visitor of the Boston's Park Street Church but a "homeless of its street-level open balcony" who never in any situation having an opportunity to introduce myself or to mention any name from the New York City, I was just the anonymous Chinese homeless who has a show on the radio with a name of Min Fang.
I have no idea why of this morning's anxiety and whom it regards, but I have been complaining of this organized "paid to shit" scheme since November of 2015 when the famous British Crown Prince and his famous wife started to patch up stories how I had intruded their private life in London of United Kindom of Britain when I was a "homeless" or a resident of the public housing in Boston, Massachusetts of the United States. I have accused the organizer of this "paid to shit" scheme Albert Gore has been intended to Murder for Money, I am wondering other than the intellectual income this Albert Gore had stolen from me and others with invalid "Judge's ruling", where this payment to "shit me all over" should be expected from?
I heard 1989's students' movement was supported by this big group of participants of this "paid to shit" scheme, was I blamed for being the person who advised not to put tons of Chinese people into financial desperation in that special economic transition time of the 1980s? Why is this?
Does this group ever think from their own election system that free election does not mean the blindfold election that well-informed voters are absolutely necessary to have the fair election to choose a candidate from the expectation out of knowing who the candidate is and what the candidate can do for the voters? Does this group know these well-informed voters need to be informed by a system which can't be achieved overnight by the college students marching on the streets?
Does this group know when streets were blocked, there were tons of business in this situation may go bankrupt and 1989's China did not have the social welfare system to support the jobless, nor an open labor market to find a job? A bankrupt business in 1989 means the entire staff of the business would not have a single penny income for the rest of their lives to buy any food nor to support their families? China had started some policies to allow private small business in the 1980s was to ease this financial desperation situation that caused by the China's economic system transmitting fron the planned economy to the market economy, why this group still think as such today that this big population (6%) of Chinese people's potential financial desperation meant nothing at all to them to wish to severe it?
I was wondering why this group want the People's Republic of China to have such a government as the current administration who are famous now for their "Don't serve the People but get paid to enjoy the excessive powers & special privileges that never granted by the People's Republic of China's Constitution", why this group enjoy to see so much anger from the 1.3Billion Chinese People instead of their happy spirits?
I heard this group may say their understanding of letting Chinese people happy is to make my life bankrupt as they have participated, I say how do they know it is the Chinese 1.3 Billion People who want to kill me in order to have some money only worth their several months' salary each? Why this group would fancy that the Chinese people are not the hard working people willing to make their own money as they always have been?
Like I have pointed out, a creator of a movie is different with a producer, a director, or a scriptwriter, it is the same in a country's governing. The public posts are policymakers, the Congress is lawmakers, and the government employees are administrative & executive groups of the laws and policies.
Why I have been denied for who I am when my contributions to China such as Megacity subways, covered Green Farms, desert developing, etc are all originally my creative thoughts to benefit Chinese people which inspired these regional economic projects that have been administered by the local, provincial and central government of the People's Republic of China?
Exactly who is fighting this title of thought-creator of these economic projects from the People's Republic of China government?
----June 23rd, 2018
06-22-2018 我和华裔社区的矛盾究竟是什么（1）
听说很多听众认为我和波士顿的中国城超市一定矛盾很大。
我的回应：我也很奇怪他们怎们那么愤怒。
我就从来没去找过他们讨价还价，更不用说找经理人员聊天要折扣，也就是去买买菜，也就是柜台上放什么买什么。我现在还很少买菜，有将近1-2年很少买菜了，我这一两年不是外食就是买一次混几个星期这种。除了他们说的"非的拿光”是指我会买光摆放在货架上待卖的我喜欢的蔬果外，也就是“好东西都给我买走了”之外，实在不知道他们愤怒的是什么。以前在平价超市我是经常和一些站在旁边看我会不会“偷东西”的所谓华人顾客发生冲突，也因此和其经理部门关系紧张，但这种情形很少发生在这个中国城超市连锁。不过，平价超市现在已经是这个中国城超市连锁店的一部分了。
至于说到我自称是其投资人，他们是可以通过内部财会系统核实的。我所继承的信托在美国的基金公司(就是美国“Pejoves”基金公司）是一家专门投资的基金公司，对福特汽车的投资就已经至少是”爷爷级”啦，对中国的福特汽车更是至少是个“曾祖父级”，因为中间可能有个公司叫福特国际公司甚至还有一个福特亚洲公司。对波士顿中国城超市连锁可能是通过其他贸易公司的超市投资之类的且很有可能是至少4-5代的“曾祖父”级投资，能有什么矛盾？我那有可能没有任何凭据就到他们柜台上去要求现金给付？我还没经常去买菜他们就已经如此公开表达愤怒，还会因为莫名的害怕而不敢报警啊？
我就是奇怪他们哪来的那么多看不惯，我有钱还是没钱能有他们什么事啊？是谁就是这么看不惯，就是能有怎么大的愤怒这么响亮的声音啊？何况他们表达愤怒的广播剧就是以我为主要人物播出我的故事都已经有十几年了，按照美国的劳工法都没有可能没有一个子儿，哪里会需要他们看不惯我不肯打餐馆工挣口便宜饭吃啊？他们的超市是应该有律师懂法律的。他们也在麻州波士顿，他们是可以查询我作为麻州居民是否已经就我的广播剧收入向麻州总检察长办公室报警的。我2007年一月从电脑咨询员工作岗位辞职，当时的摩根大通银行同事就没人认为奇怪，就是因为广播剧是从2005年1月起就已经开播当时已经两年了，我那里还会需要做工拿一份工资吃饭啊。
我是自个瞎猜啊，凭我自己的亲身经历，一定是有人在他们的超市里搅混水想闷钱。借口这个借口那个，愤怒这个愤怒那个，这个就是不行那个就是不行，其实都是在忙着想收银箱里的钱。否则哪有那么大的需要对一个难的去买菜的我表达如此强烈如此被众所认可的“极大愤怒”啊？
我昨天去买菜，也是一路被人觉得滑稽，我估计是所谓的“最穷的富豪来了”特别滑稽。我当时已经是筋疲力尽了，所以只想买东西走人。美国麻州波士顿大学真的很多，生物工程研究的很多，所以知道我的脑控癌治疗情形的人也很多。我还真是没吹牛，广播上讲的我每天的治疗费用预算可能也不是瞎编，我自己确实不知道数额多少，但我确定是我自己在付钱治疗。我现在很少买菜也很少外食也是因为治疗，现在所谓的自动感染已经不是问题，就是累得不得了。
----2018年6月22日。
昨天在广播里表达愤怒不满的是我刚来美国时的纽约曼哈顿Jennifer的女儿。
我的回应：我就是在这个Jennifer夫妻俩的公寓房里于1996年认识了Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford). Jennifer 的这个女儿已婚不和父母同住是Jennifer当年可以收留我入住的原因。我是最近才听说了她母亲Jennifer的离世，希望他们一家一切都好。
认识Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford) 当时只有我和Jennifer在场，但我认识的这个人是个福特就是这个女儿发现的，所以昨天是由这个女儿在广播剧上说明我没有可能会和福特家的任何人有任何关系。我本人不清楚真相但也不是太在乎我自己的亲生孩子是否和福特这个名字有血缘上的关系。Like I said, I understood "the same size as Rockefellers" I was told on June 30th of 2004 as "With that s appended (not certain if appended or 's), I am a Rockefeller richer who is much wealthier than a Ford", why would I care?
至于她的愤怒可能和她被广播剧于2011年前后宣布而无奈离开她所喜欢的银行工作可能有关， 但我不是太清楚广播剧如此宣布的原因是什么。
至于这个女儿提到她很难理解我完全不珍惜她母亲Jennifer当年对我的收留，我的解释是我自1997年搬离他父母在曼哈顿的公寓以后就因为我自己工作学习忙碌，很难有完整的时间可以去经常探视她父母，从未单独和她父亲联络过，从来都是如有联络，都是只拨打电话给Jennifer本人就可以。但她母亲Jennifer于2004年6月中旬我探视她父母的时侯，在她父母与我聚餐的饭桌上当着她父亲的面莫名其妙的表达她母亲Jennifer自己很担心我会勾引她父亲，这是我从那天起就不可能和她父母再有任何联络的原因。
我是1999年9月起就已经是4-5万年薪的电脑程序员工作，H1签证，2004年绿卡申请的劳工卡就已经批准了，2005年4月就已经取得正式绿卡。我自2015年起就已经是美国公民了，通过工作移民取得，所以不会需要通过婚姻而拥有美国居民的合法身份，也不会需要和她及她的父亲取得联系。
我不是太清楚这是她本人表达还是广播剧制作效果，但我确实不会出于任何需要而和他们一家取得任何联系，他们一家帮不了我什么。
----2018年6月22日。
06-21-2018 那一片960万平方公里土地是一个共和国还是已经私家实质拥有？
听说了今天早上提到的有关“私人认可却拥有实质上事实上的公权力”。
我的回应：我也持同样的观点。我在这个博客上痛骂的就是我一直以来的观点。
你自己没有能力，你就说你自己没有能力领导中国，你别说13亿人民里面就没有任何人有能力可以领导中国了，非得由你来当国家领导人，非得由你的男睾具来任命你唯一认可的女人性器官作为才是可以够资格有能力凭着你的睾具特别欣赏这么一个现实状况就必须让这个女性因为她自己的性器官就可以拥有实质上甚至事实上的只有13亿人民才能赋予的国家领导人公权力。
“没有办法”，“你说能怎么办”从来不是什么有领导能力者的语言和无奈表达，何况中国共产党始终强调的都是中国共产党对中国的集体领导，而非一些男女共产党员通过男女性交来实现对中国的集体领导。
我认为只要那960万平方公里土地还是或者说至少还是在号称是中华人民共和国的领土领海和领空，并不是私人可以传承的，就不应该由利益紧密相连的以一女对多男类别的性交关系组合来实现实质上事实上的性交集体来领导统治管理13亿人民的现实状态。
*共和国的定义：
共和政治的基本含义就是，国家和政府是公共的，而不是私人的，国家和政府应当为公共利益而努力，而不应当为私人利益而奋斗。共和政治的另一个基本含义是，国家各级政权机关的领导人不是继承的，不是世袭的，也不是命定的，而是由自由公正的选举产生的。因而，公正而自由的选举，是判断一个国家是否真正实行共和政治的又一基本准则。
（定义来源：https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD/579415 ）
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
----2018年6月21日。
听说了有关“为什么方敏对于昨天美国军方的正式宣布不是特别敏感？”
我的回应：我和美国军方所宣布的R家当事人没有任何职业上工作上及金钱上的任何依附关系，双方私人财产从来都是独立，昨天美国军方的正式宣布是强调双方没有任何私人交往关系。
R家的财产是在1900年前后在美国开始发展兴旺，我所继承的信托是在1600年前后开始在美国投资茁壮成长并见证了美国这边土地由移民（殖民*）垦荒变成了美利坚合众国的历史。 双方财产没有重叠但有由专业经理人员进行的公司合作投资关系，我本人没有也不会直接参与公司的投资业务及经营管理。
*殖民和移民的区别：移民的国籍及人口管理随移居而改变。1776年独立以前的美国只是一片土地可以移居，但没有国家政府及人口管理，所以移居人口没有国籍的改变被称为殖民。
----2018年6月21日。
06-20-2018 Why radio program has been so destructive? (为什么这个广播剧就是要砸，要毁坏？）
Heard this morning's U.S. military's announcement.
My response: I heard it is requested and it is official.
----June 20th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why this radio program is so destructive.
My response: I don't know what really happened but I have understood the destructiveness regarding who I am has been intentional and led by the central government of the People's Republic of China.
The Chinese community abroad, especially the Chinese mainland, join this destructive effort to self-promote own local advantages is my assumption.
I have already denounced myself from the Chinese community abroad.
I have announced I already I have no association with the People's Republic of China.
----June 20th, 2018
听说了今天早上美国军方的宣布。
我的回应：我听说这是应当事人要求宣布的，是正式宣布。
----2018年6月20日。
听说了今天早上提到广播剧为何就是要砸了要毁了我的一切。
我的回应：我不清楚事实真相是什么，对于通过广播剧及其推广活动，对我个人所进行的打砸毁灭等一切努力，我一直都理解为这一切都是故意有意所为，都是在中华人民共和国北京中央政府的领导下进行。
海外华裔社区，特别是海外大陆移民社区广泛参与这些针对我个人的打砸毁灭活动，我推测是为了拔高他们自己在海外当地的地位。
我已经宣布我不属于海外华裔社区。
我已经宣布我和中华人民共和国没有任何关系。
----2018年6月20日。
从2015年中国北京政府的态度公开化开始，就一点都不奇怪当初我爷爷决定留在中华人民共和国是否有可能让我爷爷，我父亲和我成为了中国北京政府的监视对象，很明显我们家从来不受中国北京政府欢迎。如果这是事实，我也不需要躲躲闪闪的而是直接公开指出这一点事实。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府告知方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人是真实，我方敏是1996年离开中国的，我现在已经是美国公民了。我方敏是否有政治立场已经和中华人民共和国及海外华裔社区没有任何关系， 请不要以任何借口认为我方敏没有中华人民共和国或者海外华裔社区就难以生存以避免不必要的误会。我方敏会捍卫我方敏自己作为美国公民的合法权利和利益，我方敏也绝不会就此犹豫妥协。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府或海外华裔社区广为告知我方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
----published in April, 2018 (标题"没有了你们永远都不意味着失去")
我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设
----2018年6月20日。
06-19-2018 华人世界的困扰 （The anger of "Why Americans only willing to give me money, not other former or current citizens from the same People's Republic of China")
My explanation: This or that money is from this Trust or that Trust that I inherited, never from the American people, nor the American companies, nor the U.S. government.
1：为什么美国人只肯给我钱，凭什么？
我的回应：这4亿美金那4亿美金都不是美国政府给的，也不是美国公司送的，都是我已经去世的爷爷生前留给我的那几个信托基金支付给我的。
现在吵得天翻地覆的就是由美国“Pejoves”基金支付的那个4亿美金。“乌龙事件”，于姓私人助理及于家故事，一个福特孩子妈Jessica O'Connor，今天的波士顿中国城超市，都是在反映究竟是谁不准我方敏花这4亿美金，究竟矛盾是什么。
乌龙事件的主人公是和这家美国基金公司的美国二等亲堂兄弟公司的名字相连，于家故事是和这家美国基金公司从1967年7月-1996年10月或年底所支付的每月一万美金的生活费相连，福特家人及中国城超市是和这家美国基金公司的投资相连，就我所知，还有故事待续。
所有这些矛盾，都造成了我在美国麻州波士顿日常生活中很多的向美国警方的投诉，包括我感觉陌生华人就是敢在非华裔邻居的惊讶目光下直接用钥匙开门进入我的公寓拿东西，还可以笑咪咪的拎了东西堂而皇之的就走。我的家里除了一点非常便宜衣服，就没有值钱东西。邮箱要是有支票寄来，我就担心收不收得到。银行里我也是只敢留一点钱，其他的都是全部现金提出随身携带，据说还被波士顿华裔社区向美国政府举报说我藏钱不报还一定要拿美国穷人补贴，好在我一直也在向美国政府就同一问题也就是我所继承的信托已经向波士顿及麻州支付的我的生活费究竟在哪里我为什么只有金额没法比的穷人补贴而进行投诉。我去华人超市餐馆消费，明明购物的现金是从我口袋里拿出，还有华人在旁吆喝担心我在他们店里偷钱偷东西，就像你们已经在广播里听到的波士顿平价超市的故事。
这一切除了因为中华人民共和国从2015年开始以用真实人物进行文艺演出为名，或编造或剪辑他人故事以实施栽赃谩骂造谣诽谤所造成的严重后果之外，还有就是我2004年继承财产时中国外交部的一些工作人员弄不清法律上的继承只能是继承死人钱，误以为我说我有钱继承是想拿美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人的性交钱，并广为宣传说我所说的这钱那钱其实是美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人不想给的性交钱所造成的美国华裔社区对我方敏老说自己有钱已经退休了不愿去做餐馆工挣生活费用的非常普遍的反感。我已经就这些全部向美国警方投诉了。
至于我的那些发明及智慧产权究竟怎么会事，可能有一些美国人及华裔从2005年广播剧在美国上线播出可能就开始的一些活动。我听说的是我的第一笔智慧产权收入是在2007年被广播剧宣布后被人提取，其他就像你们在广播剧里已经听到的，一切都在美国司法部门的调查当中。我以前一直以为我的发明是以额外的投资机会来答谢的，所以会由我所继承的信托进行投资，后来听说因为投资人是在太多所以公司付出的其实是现金智慧产权收入后我就报警处理了。
----2018年6月19日。
2：O家困扰的那家公司都已经说清了，你为什么还说自己有钱。
我的回应：那家公司是方敏所继承信托所投资的一家投资基金公司，这家美国基金公司由一家英国基金公司全资拥有，方敏所继承的信托是这家英国基金公司的上游投资机构。这是这家美国基金公司的英国投资基金公司已经说明的。
强调那家美国公司是独立运作公司由英国公司全资拥有，这是在强调现代企业管理学中的有钱可以投资的人和企业的专业管理能力不是同一个范畴的这么一个概念，这样的概念可以有利于公司的发展。我本人目前是MBA在读，很同意这种概念所以不需要反对或者争辩。
----2018年6月19日。
3: 继承信托和兄弟分家产（即继承遗产）的区别是什么。
我的回应：举个例子，大年初一那天，我那活的好好爷爷给了我一个红包压岁钱也就是设了一个信托基金给我，第二天也就是大年初二，我爷爷遇到车祸去世了，他的下一代也就是他的几个儿子要分家产的话，我拿到的压岁钱算不算他留下的遗产？当然不算啦，都已经在前一天给出去的钱啦，哪里还能算成是他自己死后留下的东西啊。
就因为这压岁钱红包是爷爷们在设立时就写好委托书（就是死后的遗嘱）还写得清清楚楚就给我一个人的，所以我所继承的信托基金是我一个人拥有。爷爷们只给我一个人这份压岁钱红包的原因就是因为我是家里2500年来唯一的有和他们一样的胎记掌纹的女孩，我的父亲没有就是因为我父亲虽然也有胎记掌纹，但他是个男孩，和给我压岁钱红包的那些爷爷们性别一样，一点都不稀奇。
我爷爷的弟妹和我父亲的弟妹是我唯一听说过的亲戚，我爷爷的弟妹对我父亲以及我父亲的弟妹对我也确实是亲戚相待是我愿意在我继承后送他们每家一份送给亲戚的礼物的原因。
1：中国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照国际上的法律继承通行规则，法律继承行为发生所在地的法律是有效继承法律。
2：美国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照美国法律，我方敏作为中国公民美国居民2004年6月30日在美国领土上的信托继承是合法有效继承。
3：美国基金公司所作的说明是：按照该公司内部法律文件及其上级投资公司说明，我方敏所继承的信托是该公司的上游投资公司，该公司是按其上级投资公司的指示支付我方敏费用。
这是我所知道的按照美国的以及中国的继承法及信托法的说法，如有异议，请出示相关法律事实依据及法律条款。
我向美国警方所投诉的就是为什么依据法律的财产拥有权说法居然可以被想要钱的人以“就是不同意，就是不理解，就是没法明白”为理由就必须让我给钱或者不准我用我自己合法继承的钱。
----2018年6月19日。
现在吵得天翻地覆的就是由美国“Pejoves”基金支付的那个4亿美金。“乌龙事件”，于姓私人助理及于家故事，一个福特孩子妈Jessica O'Connor，今天的波士顿中国城超市，都是在反映究竟是谁不准我方敏花这4亿美金，究竟矛盾是什么。
乌龙事件的主人公是和这家美国基金公司的美国二等亲堂兄弟公司的名字相连，于家故事是和这家美国基金公司从1967年7月-1996年10月或年底所支付的每月一万美金的生活费相连，福特家人及中国城超市是和这家美国基金公司的投资相连，就我所知，还有故事待续。
所有这些矛盾，都造成了我在美国麻州波士顿日常生活中很多的向美国警方的投诉，包括我感觉陌生华人就是敢在非华裔邻居的惊讶目光下直接用钥匙开门进入我的公寓拿东西，还可以笑咪咪的拎了东西堂而皇之的就走。我的家里除了一点非常便宜衣服，就没有值钱东西。邮箱要是有支票寄来，我就担心收不收得到。银行里我也是只敢留一点钱，其他的都是全部现金提出随身携带，据说还被波士顿华裔社区向美国政府举报说我藏钱不报还一定要拿美国穷人补贴，好在我一直也在向美国政府就同一问题也就是我所继承的信托已经向波士顿及麻州支付的我的生活费究竟在哪里我为什么只有金额没法比的穷人补贴而进行投诉。我去华人超市餐馆消费，明明购物的现金是从我口袋里拿出，还有华人在旁吆喝担心我在他们店里偷钱偷东西，就像你们已经在广播里听到的波士顿平价超市的故事。
这一切除了因为中华人民共和国从2015年开始以用真实人物进行文艺演出为名，或编造或剪辑他人故事以实施栽赃谩骂造谣诽谤所造成的严重后果之外，还有就是我2004年继承财产时中国外交部的一些工作人员弄不清法律上的继承只能是继承死人钱，误以为我说我有钱继承是想拿美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人的性交钱，并广为宣传说我所说的这钱那钱其实是美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人不想给的性交钱所造成的美国华裔社区对我方敏老说自己有钱已经退休了不愿去做餐馆工挣生活费用的非常普遍的反感。我已经就这些全部向美国警方投诉了。
至于我的那些发明及智慧产权究竟怎么会事，可能有一些美国人及华裔从2005年广播剧在美国上线播出可能就开始的一些活动。我听说的是我的第一笔智慧产权收入是在2007年被广播剧宣布后被人提取，其他就像你们在广播剧里已经听到的，一切都在美国司法部门的调查当中。我以前一直以为我的发明是以额外的投资机会来答谢的，所以会由我所继承的信托进行投资，后来听说因为投资人是在太多所以公司付出的其实是现金智慧产权收入后我就报警处理了。
----2018年6月19日。
2：O家困扰的那家公司都已经说清了，你为什么还说自己有钱。
我的回应：那家公司是方敏所继承信托所投资的一家投资基金公司，这家美国基金公司由一家英国基金公司全资拥有，方敏所继承的信托是这家英国基金公司的上游投资机构。这是这家美国基金公司的英国投资基金公司已经说明的。
强调那家美国公司是独立运作公司由英国公司全资拥有，这是在强调现代企业管理学中的有钱可以投资的人和企业的专业管理能力不是同一个范畴的这么一个概念，这样的概念可以有利于公司的发展。我本人目前是MBA在读，很同意这种概念所以不需要反对或者争辩。
----2018年6月19日。
3: 继承信托和兄弟分家产（即继承遗产）的区别是什么。
我的回应：举个例子，大年初一那天，我那活的好好爷爷给了我一个红包压岁钱也就是设了一个信托基金给我，第二天也就是大年初二，我爷爷遇到车祸去世了，他的下一代也就是他的几个儿子要分家产的话，我拿到的压岁钱算不算他留下的遗产？当然不算啦，都已经在前一天给出去的钱啦，哪里还能算成是他自己死后留下的东西啊。
就因为这压岁钱红包是爷爷们在设立时就写好委托书（就是死后的遗嘱）还写得清清楚楚就给我一个人的，所以我所继承的信托基金是我一个人拥有。爷爷们只给我一个人这份压岁钱红包的原因就是因为我是家里2500年来唯一的有和他们一样的胎记掌纹的女孩，我的父亲没有就是因为我父亲虽然也有胎记掌纹，但他是个男孩，和给我压岁钱红包的那些爷爷们性别一样，一点都不稀奇。
我爷爷的弟妹和我父亲的弟妹是我唯一听说过的亲戚，我爷爷的弟妹对我父亲以及我父亲的弟妹对我也确实是亲戚相待是我愿意在我继承后送他们每家一份送给亲戚的礼物的原因。
1：中国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照国际上的法律继承通行规则，法律继承行为发生所在地的法律是有效继承法律。
2：美国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照美国法律，我方敏作为中国公民美国居民2004年6月30日在美国领土上的信托继承是合法有效继承。
3：美国基金公司所作的说明是：按照该公司内部法律文件及其上级投资公司说明，我方敏所继承的信托是该公司的上游投资公司，该公司是按其上级投资公司的指示支付我方敏费用。
这是我所知道的按照美国的以及中国的继承法及信托法的说法，如有异议，请出示相关法律事实依据及法律条款。
我向美国警方所投诉的就是为什么依据法律的财产拥有权说法居然可以被想要钱的人以“就是不同意，就是不理解，就是没法明白”为理由就必须让我给钱或者不准我用我自己合法继承的钱。
----2018年6月19日。
06-18-2018 Why the lawful ownership means nothing just because "the deserved money-wanter is announced on the radio"?
Heard this morning's cry and child talk.
My response: I heard this "Jessica O'Connor" is one of the mothers of "the British-broadcasting announced six children", a "Matilda Shimmel" is another one.
Nothing new of this morning's intensified clarification from the agitated leftover-sucker of the crying one.
I have absolutely nothing to do with all above patrons at all. The only reason for this group to have this broadcasting is to deny the fact I do have my biological children who got nothing to do with this group biologically.
I heard this Jessica O'Connor's child is a girl who was born in mid-2010 as well. I don't know how cheap this Jessica O'Connor can be that she needed to compete with a surrogate mother, but I don't need a child to get my living expenses provided. So, I have no such children nor such child biologically associated with this morning's featured any patron.
Basically, this morning's broadcasting is to say I am not allowed to have any biological children or child because this Jessica O'Connor said so. But she may be just a woman who needs a child to get some money, why I need her permission when I am a financially independent wealthy female who should be disgusted by leftovers?
This malicious intention to deny my life to potentially abusively harmful to my biological children through this effort of building up this public denial from the biologically irrelevant group, this maliciousness intention is the reason I called law enforcement's help on this morning's broadcasting.
I already noticed, the technique-in-use is to untie my biological children with me through this public media propaganda and possibly intended to tie their own biological child or children with my inherited wealth through this building up the public impression efforts, to achieve the purpose to abuse me together with my biological children in order to take over my wealth through the public confusion.
This technique-in-use is the reason I accused the organizer intends to murder for money because I would be the one in the way for them to get my money once the public gets so confused who owns what money.
The entire efforts of this broadcasting are to impress the public that lawful ownership of the money means nothing at all, the deserved money-wanters who have the control of this public media are the patrons who should have the money because "it is announced so loudly on the radio".
So, some said, "but you don't look like you have any money in Boston of Massachusetts, and you don't sound like you have any money on the radio as well, why you keep saying you have money and wealth?"
For one, why you think there are so many efforts and necessities are needed to tell the public I have no money when it is obvious that I have no illegal means to access any money? Why it is so impressive that I have been obviously hunted on the radio and in my daily residential living in Boston of Massachusetts?
I say I am wealthy is because I lawfully own what I have announced on this web blog. My announcements about my wealth are not accurate but all lawful according to laws of the United States, the United Kingdom of Britain, the People's Republic of China and etc.
02-01-2018 Happy to be the person that not Stuck-in there
----June 18th, 2018
Regarding the proud "as long as you are fuching, A woman deserves to come to your house to fuch the penis to get your money."
My response: This proud has been since 2004, supported by the People's Republic of China's prostituting gang grouped government and some prominent American rich or associated powerful home-pussy. I was so shocked to learn the rich of being so proud to be able to afford to have some home-pussy.
I say as long as that penis is my leftover and it is from the penis' own willingness, why would I ever care? But I won't hesitate to call 911 to drag both of you out of my any private place or to prevent the penis been rapped, and to send you to the criminal court if you dare to touch my money or to fancy you can get my money via the penis.
I was even asked, "would you invite the women to your house, or introduce any woman to the penis you are fuching for that matter?"
I say being a traditional polygamist, I can certainly introduce if that penis is a leftover to me already and it is from the penis' own willingness to be introduced, but it won't be my trick to throw out a faithful life partner. I am telling you that no woman can be invited to my house for that matter but I will call the house-staff to help out the packing at the first second when the penis is introduced. No compensation would ever be arranged.
----June 18th, 2018
06-17-2018 King Lee is the ancient pronunciation-translation of my ancient grandfather's name Jing Li (南唐中主李璟, 916-961AD）
Heard this morning's talk about "Pejoves" Fund（中文）.
My response: "The investor is not allowed to own" is voiced by the People's Republic of China.
The anger is not related to the modern Business Administration's understanding which recommends investors to be separated with the managerial & administrative power of an investment to enhance the professionalism on business investment's management.
The anger is similar to "you pay for the house, but you are not allowed to own the house nor to occupy the house." (correct me if I am wrong)
The producing team is grouped by the private assistant's related and the "ex-girlfriend" family, which is the hijacker-group of my $9000 (￥9000) living expense providing paid-out from this American "Pejoves" Fund company since I was born in 1967 till I left China in 1996. Those threatening voices are from some actresses and their friend's Middle East romance, etc.
It seems this group doesn't think anything can be wrongful at all for what they did to me and my parents but still trying to get more as if the hijacking is this group's privilege. The reason they were used as the transmitting channel was because the People's Republic of China had severed diplomatic relations since 1949 until 1972 when President Nixon did the State visit to China, there was no money transfering service between the United States and the People's Republic of China. This group of people was not selected by any American nor any American company's employee.
矛盾问题就是，这一群人是我爷爷方智仁当年的于姓私人助理及兄弟姊妹的子女后裔，中国是从1949年开始和美国断交，1972年尼克松访华才恢复外交关系,1967年时没有美国向中国的银行汇款服务。这群人既不是由任何美国人挑选的，也不是由美国公司的任何雇员挑选的。 当年于姓私人助理是这家美国公司支付我的生活费的类似包裹快递的上海中转站，就像现在海外中国城都有的“中国包裹快递”这种，他们就是其中一站，但他们把包裹也就是生活费全部给扣下了，没给我父母，这包裹就是从1967年到1996年的每月9000人民币生活费。现在我成年了，人也在美国了，他们就在中国政府支持下跑美国来，必须要把这家美国公司在美国通过美国“快递公司”（美国财政部）交给我的生活费归他们所有，这不是像拦路抢劫还能是什么呀？
I heard the "thought" is this American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop the pay-out even after the fact that my parents and I did not receive a penny was known should mean "the granting". This "continuing pay-out" has been the issue between my Trust and the American "Pejoves" Fund company. I can understand the American "Pejoves" Fund company's consideration for my best interest, at least some level if not all, and this is what I express to my entrusting group. For one, I got affluent providing on my food as a child growing-up which wouldn't be easy on my parents' joint-income of￥40-￥50 per month if the paid-out completely stop.
Regarding exactly who I am to this American "Pejoves" Fund company, well, I am the beneficiary-owner of my Trust, my Trust, which was set up for me by Jing Li( or King Lee, 南唐中主李璟) in 961AD or so, has been the up-stream investor-owner of this American "Pejoves" Fund company, as this American "Pejoves" Fund company has already clarified.
King Lee is the ancient spelling translation of 李璟, this ancient spelling translation has been used in Hong Kong as well until 1990. Jing Li is the current standard English spelling translation of the People's Republic of China for 李璟. His son (my grandfather) is the famous Chinese poet "King of the Ci Poem" Yu Li（or Yuk Lee, "词帝” 南唐后主李煜, 937-978AD).
Example: 李锦记公司英文名：Lee Kum Kee Food company, the standard spelling translation for 李锦 would be: Jin Li.
References for Hong Kong common pronunciations:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4b0bb6850101avar.html
https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ccaf99b269dc5022aaea0052.html
----June 17th, 2018
Some ask exactly what has been the issue between me and Chinese National Leaders' true & lifelong love stories.
My response: The same issue as the one I am having with some American big names.
"Why their love affair is my money to pay?" has been my scream this entire time. Why they got a true love who they owe their life-long devotions is the reason that my money should be transferred to their bank accounts without my own willingness.
----June 17th, 2018
06-16-2018 就我的信托继承，我给方家后人和方家亲戚的一份说明
Heard this morning's talk about sexual intercourse money.
My response: Well, this morning's "objecting" group are, not were but have been, helping hands of what they are objecting, so, the "objecting" tones are very amicable.
----June 16th, 2018
听说了方家后人对于我没有通知他们我继承了信托很是愤怒。
我的回应：因为我当时有脑伤失意症状，在2004年6月30日及7月1日会议上也都有谈到，所以我会议结束后完全没有任何会议记忆，这也是我2015年开始查寻“我2004年究竟继承的是什么”查寻的很苦的原因。我在2015年我有现金拨打国际长途电话后就已经通知了南京方面。
按照法律，我是信托的唯一受益人而非信托的受委托人，作为信托唯一受益人的我没有任何法律上的责任义务通知其他任何人。我通知南京方面我在查询只是出于亲情，而非亏欠。我当时如果有上海亲戚的通联方式，我也会出于亲情通知他们。
我的信托律师从来不是方家共用的律师，我没有任何法律上的责任义务也没有任何意愿将我的律师包括信托律师作为方家的公用律师。
我已经将我所知道的我如何继承信托的一些信息公布在此博客，也很早就已经将此博客地址通知南京方面，我能通知上海亲戚的也就只有这个博客地址。我目前没有任何比此播客已经公布的内容更具体的信息，我今后也没有任何意愿谈论我的私人财务，所以我也不会有比这博客已经公布的内容更多的信息通知上海亲戚。如果我能有上海亲戚的通联，我愿意告知他们此博客地址。我的这个博客其实就是我的查询日记。
若有任何怀疑我的律师将方家任何人的可继承财产非法归我所有，这其实是在指控这些律师以我名义偷窃方家其他人的钱财只是没有转入这些律师他们自己的银行而已。如果这是真实怀疑及指控，这就已经是针对这些律师的刑事指控，应该向司法公安机关举报刑事贪污偷窃案件，而非认为我是在授权只愿意通过司法公安机关给钱。司法公安机关是捍卫法治社会司法公平正义的政府机构，不是文娱演出单位，更非私人律师或者财经服务公司。
民事法庭是针对财产所有权解决纠纷的地方，按照法律要求就财产的拥有权必须给个符合法律的说法的地方，报警是就财产被非法抢夺而寻求执法人员协助的方式。
我方敏所继承钱财被一些人在没有任何法律依据可以上民事法庭打财产纠纷官司的情况下， 莫名其妙就被要求我方敏必须就我所继承钱财给这些人一个非法律的说法，而且不用给钱方式解决这个矛盾就是不行，是我方敏就此报警的原因。我方敏报警就是在寻求执法人员协助保护我方敏的合法财产。
至于上海亲戚投诉他们的父亲方智仁的信托遗嘱看不到，我本人认为上海亲戚没有任何需要看方智仁的这份遗嘱。方智仁替我设立的信托是在1948年设立时就是设立成为法人机构，所以有当时的法人机构登记记录在香港政府。方智仁设立该信托时，方智仁的所有子女都已经出生，方智仁设立该信托时所立下的委托书在他去世后以后就成为方智仁就这份信托所立下的遗嘱。方智仁是1965年去世，方智仁去世前也已经对他的所有子女做了1965年的亲笔临终交代及财产安排。方智仁从1948年该信托设立后到他1965年去世就从未更改他本人的信托意愿。我方敏认为在方智仁所有子女都已经有了方智仁1965年所立下的遗嘱的情况下，方智仁1948年就信托所立下的遗嘱是方智仁给我方敏的私人信件，我方敏不愿意此信件被任何人查询。
至于有人质疑方智仁哪里来的这么多钱，这是合法私人钱财，多少都不管任何人的事。方智仁，方智仁的父亲和爷爷三代都是当时的中华民国政府教育部的捐款大户，三代所捐款项总额是当时的中华民国政府设立中央大学系统全部所需金额的90%左右。当时因为有很多方姓人士捐款，所以有很多说法。方智仁的父亲是方智仁爷爷的胎记掌纹及财产继承人，方智仁父子就捐款金额也非常低调，但台湾的中华民国政府教育部档案里应该有正确的信息。
方智仁父亲的所有子女都是我曾祖母所出，方智仁的所有子女都是我祖母所出是方智仁的父亲这支从方智仁这一代才开始有亲戚走动的原因，我方敏从未听说方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女， 我方敏也从未和方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女有过任何往来。
----2018年6月16日。
Comments
Post a Comment