关于广播剧 （十二）
Chinese version
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站，你要么在东北大学里，要么不知该往哪走，要么你走走就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
我的电邮地址：SomebodyInMA@gmail.com, somebodyInBoston@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
My other blog -- Chronicle Note(我的另一个博客）
The saying I heard is "This blocking effort is all about laws, not about if friendly or not."
1: Which part of the process of transmitting money payment to me is unlawful?
5: If this is all about precaution in blocking payment to me because you thought it is never my money.
我听说的态度是：“这一切努力都是关于法律，不是什么友善不友善的事“
1：究竟支付款项给我的过程中那一步是非法的？
02-23-2019 2-08-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （15）-- 南师大附中，高考，和大学时的学习能力
我是1982年入读，1985年从南师大附中高中部毕业的。高中时是高一上学期（1982年的九月）拍电影说我漂亮，因为拍摄时间都是学校上课时间，所以就只有85届2班看到过。我在整个高中就读期间的样子，就是我在1989年5月的全国高校会议时的形象，很简单，很中性，很学生。
我高一入学时，成绩都是一般在60-70分左右，高一时上课都是一个人坐最后一排，和女生交往有限，和男生没有任何言语接触。高一下学期开始有了女同桌，才开始和同班的女生有了交往。上课除了聊天就是望着窗外神游，所以高中好像是被老师换了几个同桌到高三时才有了稳定座位。
对高考学习的建议，是在我高二下学期1984年五月份左右的的时候，我记得我那天是穿着薄外套和衬衫。我对高考的建议，就是广播剧上所播出的，我当时坚持自己会在高三开始实施自己的复习计划，就是因为我作为初中靠高中时自己就已经实践过了，很有效，我的初中就读经历和高中差不过，初三成绩的稳步急速上升是我当年可以考上省重点高中的南师大附中高中部的原因。
最近才听说，南师大附中很多的校友都没听懂广播剧所播出的我对高考复习的建议，认为那是瞎掰是弄了个广播剧胡说八道想挣钱而已，我本人可以在1985年以85届2班全班女生高考成绩第一名毕业，南师大附中的很多校友认为不是我撞了大运而已就是可能有作弊，是今天南师大附中很多校友认为我没有可能有任何学术研究上的任何成就的原因，认为我方敏是有史以来最大的假冒伪造的原因。
其实当年我作为高中二年级的学生，提出的建议就是因为当年的我已经认识到了科学是严谨的，这严谨也反映在了科学原理及科学定义的语言陈述上。科学原理和定义，都在经历了无数次的论证和试验而成为理论，都有其严格的使用前提，适用范围，和准确的功能。一旦意识到这点，用字典所定义的各个名词来理解定义，就会对高中的数理化所涉及的各项远离定义的使用前提，适用范围及具体功能有很清晰的了解。但作为学习理解能力有限的中学学生，这份清晰了解就只有在高二复习考试过后，也就是在初步掌握了高中两年所学内容之后，回头看才能有的一份认知。因为不想失去高二暑假的快乐时光，所以我当时强调我自己会从高三9月份开学时开始进行这类复习，时间上应该可以正好赶上7月份的高考，我初三考高中时就已经有经验了。我高三整个复习高考都很轻松，从不需要熬夜，有时甚至还可以看看电视。
考试所测试的内容也都是对于数理化定义和原理的认知和理解，一旦清晰理解这些数理化的原理定义的使用前提，适用范围和准确功能，不管是试图混淆的选择题，或者是只有正确选择恰档的使用定义原理之后才能演绎推理的应用问答题，都是可以清楚很多而因此可以做出正确答案。这是我在14，15岁初三时就已经掌握并且经过实践过的学习能力和方法。
我的高中第三年和初中第三年的成绩进步是一样的稳步上升直至联考。我1982年的高中联考考上南师大附中高中部，及1985年的大学联考考上中国医药界数一数二的上海第一医学院就读药理专业，都是凭实际能力考试的结果，从来不是什么撞了大运也不是什么作弊而有。
我念大学的时候，理解能力认知事物的能力也已经强了很多，老师上课讲的，基本上当时就已经全部能听懂了，所以虽然很少在课后复习，到考试的时候上课所学的内容也常常忘了很多，但基本原理和系统知识都学会了。我能一个人自学经济学教授厉以宁的那本《宏观经济学》，凭的也就是这份学习，认知和理解的能力。
据说南京市药检所的周自新是逢人就说我”嘻大遛岗“的那一种，可以说是他本人对我年轻时的印象，据说也是那个1976年和我父亲为买裙子吵架的北京天文台那家的亲生女儿以中国共青团中央的名义在89年高校会议以后从北京到处联系各地，到处造谣的结果。
南师大附中校友中，可能有很多当年没有考上心仪大学的校友，似乎始终没有放弃心中那一份当年的纠结，老是一副”凭什么是你？你不过就是当年高考撞了大运而已“的态度，是我在高中毕业已经三十四年之后的今天认为实在有点很烦人的原因。据说在波士顿的华裔社区，就是这些人以政府雇员的身份在到处宣扬对我方敏的鄙视和仇恨。
----2019年2月23日。
02-22- 2019 The reason for an attending phenomenon on July 1st of 2004 (2004年7月1日那天为何那么多的政府参与电讯会议？）
Heard a lot confused, if it was my entrusting related meeting, why so many public officials were presented on July 1st of 2004's teleconference?
My answer: That was because it was the day right after June 30th's revolutionary talk about the invention of smartphones, also it was also the mid-term election time when economic development was very important topics to the running Republic party. A lot of conversations were about international economic development as well might be the reasons for worldwide governments' participation.
I was impressed on June 30th already right after finishing smartphones' related conversation, tons of people, who may have been informed by their associated, had "phoned me" asking if there are other investments opportunities because the smartphone-related were all overcrowded already. So many people feel so bad so they eagerly helped out by asking if there can be more ideas to create more investment opportunities? The next day which was July 1st, one can really use "people mountain people sea" to describe the teleconference attending phenomenon.
I got a lot of luck that day as well that I earned a lot of intellectual rewards from all those economic development related conversations. If some say that I should return the favor of opportunity granting from those public officials, I say the huge tax-incomes and job opportunities created for economic development have been all they have been working hard for, which should have been what drive them to serve the public as well.
It has been rumored in Chinese communities abroad that 1989's Student movement related teleconference was the reason I could have such opportunity to be such privileged by the U.S. government, this blog article is the clarification of such rumors. The entire teleconference on July 1st of 2004 was all economic-centric and related.
----Feb 22nd, 2019
听说华人社区及中国大陆很多人都很奇怪如果只是我的信托相关会议，为何2004年7月1日有那么多的各国政府官员参与？
我的回答：那是因为2004年6月30日那天有关智能手机的一场谈话对美国经济可能发生的正面影响所引发的，而且当时正在进行的美国总统中期选举可能是美国当时执政的共和党踊跃参与及组织各种相关会议的原因。有些话题因为国际层面的经济发展，可能是很多其他国家的政府也踊跃参与的原因。
我本人影响最深刻的就是6月30日智能手机谈话一结束，相关各方人员都在准备如何进行这场通讯革命的时候，估计大量的各方投资人就都被亲朋通知参与会议，我自己一下就被各方“致电查询”是否还有投资机会？智能手机的投资机会已经满额了。没有办法，当时是各方人士都在积极安抚这些致电查询人士，都在帮忙想办法看还有什么是可以创造一些投资机会的。第二天就是2004年7月1日那天，更是可以用“浩浩荡荡”来形容参与会议人员。
我占很大便宜了，因为很多涉及地区及行业经济发展的相关话题，我有机会拿了很多的智慧专利收入。有人会说我是否应该考虑回馈给创造这机会的那些从政人员？我说所创造的大量工作机会及高额税收就已经是他们最想要的了，这应该也是他们作为从政人员致力于发展经济的一个重要动力。
有很多国内人员听说1989年的全国高校会议是我在美国受到美国政府如此高规格待遇的原因，根本纯属误传。当时整个会议都是关于经济发展，以及由经济发展所延伸的。
----2019年2月22日。
Heard tons of rumor that it is understood as my own willingness to watch others take over my money.
My answer: This has been ridiculous rumors the entire time.
This rumor started since July 1st of 2004. It was a conversation that I was asked what else I would like to spend on my money, I said I am a business person that believe in making customers favorable products as long as it is a fair competition that regulated by laws, and I came from China that I enjoyed the United States lawful governing very much that I would be willing to encourage to make it even better.
I heard rumors that my complaints about I can't receive intellectual reward payment and living expenses payments are all related to the hypothesis that "this is a distribution channel market that refusal of distributing is the power" that no one can do anything about, especially those payments from Trusts are all strictly to be through fixed distributing channels. And any financial loss should be understood as my own willingness to be sacrificed to improve related laws, which is an untrue statement. Plus, any such things are possibly violating criminal laws.
I was willing to encourage to improve laws, but it does not mean to encourage to take advantage of the weakness of laws which normally are understood as "should be convicted as guilty if intended to take advantage of".
So, I refuse to be a victim. And I know I have been protected by laws already.
----Feb, 20th, 2019, updated on Feb 22nd, 2019
02-19-2019 Who owns Ingonyama entitlement?
I own the Ingonyama entitlement from the legendary of 1000 years long
Heard the confusion if I am an Ingonyama for real? The confusion is because of an African lady, currently live in the United States as well) has been the one handsomely provided for by the Ingonyama Fund since 2001 or 2007.
I also heard she is the same African lady that had stated the difference between her and me in 2017 that she came from the "Ingonyama" King of 500 years ago and the Ingonyama title has been a legendary was the reason of her grandfather's inauguration, and I, the heir female palm, inherited the Ingonyama legendary title in 2004 as part of the Trust-Inheriting from my birth Ancient Chinese Imperial family..
I am the female palm because I carry family heir birthmark on both of my palms, and I am the only heir girl since, maybe, 2500 years ago is the reason I received a lot of gifts from my Emperor grandfathers who normally gift their favorite people with money, entitlement, and beauty. Being their heir girl, my Emperor grandfathers had each entitled me an Emperor title, not their own in-use title which should be my next generation grandfather, as well as their heir sons, to inherit, but an equivalent new entitlement as a gift to state I am their heir girl. This is how I got my Ingonyama entitlement.
I have been provided for the two Trusts set up by Ingonyama heir son "Simba" and "Simba's son" which I call my fourth and fifth year's providing as their heir "Female Palm" girl with entitlement from each as well which I will announce once I heard of them.
I have not received this Ingonyama entitled grandfather's providing is the confusion of Ingonyama Fund, but I am the beneficiary person of a Trust who has limited knowledge on all these financial historical matters. All I know is I inherited an ancient Trust from an ancient Emperor grandfather who gifted me with money and Ingonyama entitlement, and I heard both Simba's Trust and Simba's son's Trusts I have been provided-for are been verified for over 600 years old according to the commercial registration laws. I think my entrusting attorneys will work on clarify further confusions if there is any.
----Feb. 19th, 2019
02-18-2019 Whose $400Million a year? How to know?
Heard about this confusion of "who's paying for this $400Million a year".
1: How any American rich can be so confused if they are in the same American business society and running some American business as well?
My answer: My Trusts' investment as a Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) who came to America with their investors' own government-convoys and armed with Musketeers as pioneers at America's colonial time which was about 400 years ago. That is the reason why some in-confusing companies were initially registered with their investor companies' own governments' convoys, till the 1776's registration to the United States' government.
Because of the difference in each's starting-up years, some of my Trusts' investments have complete different associated supplying and financing associates that completely not associated with those confused rich men's family wealth's investments. The difference is the same as Military hospital groups, the commercial hospital chains, and some international goodwill hospital groups, all are completely not associated with each other even running in the same local areas.
----Feb. 18th, 2019
2: The real $400Million recipient is a Hispanic female whose middle name is "Min", and the last name is "Fone".
My answer:
I have no idea how the payment-instruction letter has used Fone as the last name unless that is a typo which can be easily verified. And I don't know if this is the same $400Million payment that I mentioned as yearly providing on my web blog.
Those five Trusts I have inherited were all set up before I was born so that all used my family nickname "Female Palms" with clear specification of who this girl should be. I used "Min Fang" as my name since July 1967 which was shortly after my birth. $400Million payment a year for the past five years from my inherited Trusts are all identity-sensitive, not the last name's spelling-sensitive.
----Feb. 18th, 2019
3: How to verify if this is some rich men's money that was announced so loudly never intend to give me?
My answer: Very easily: The paying company's internal "stock certificate registration record" and government commerce department's commercial company registration record.
Steps:
4: If it possibly from any American rich men?
My answer: My inheriting experience has been real and it is impossible for me to expect money from any American rich men.
The problem I have with some confused rich American men is: Some insist that it is impossible that I have my own money trust-inherited from my birth Chinese grandfathers.
Some even insist on to tell around that I could spend their money by not asking them, not contacting them, not telling anyone to collect money from them, and not has any money on me or being expected that should be from their own bank accounts.
----Feb. 18th, 2019
02-12-2019 How to know if I am a say-er or a do-er in research?
Heard about arguments how any project-outsider can evaluate if my achievement is authentic? I also have this wondering why academic evaluation need to be conducted by some political grassroots movement? What should be the expectation for the general public's participation in any scientific academic level evaluation? even if this is money sensitive evaluation for the intellectual incomes?
So, I have formed this question for everybody: Why the General Public should be expected to have the evaluation power without professional knowledge and professional experiences?
----Feb. 12th, 2019
Also, I heard a lot of people who visited my MBA blog has some doubts about me.
1: If I exaggerated as a say-er for who I am but not really a doer leader at all?
My response: That post is the resume of how I assess myself if I am eligible to be its leader, the if-doer assessment is actually the organization assessment which is my MBA capstone project that I am learning to do for the same organization, which is to assess the organization for its overall goodness and challenges to decide if I should propose myself as its doer leader.
2: How could I come up such leadership PPT based on those five or six leadership articles?
My response: In research, once a project's frame is shaping up nicely by the research, another important part is to fill in missing links for evidence support and theoretical relate, which is similar to smoothness required between paragraphs in articulation or literature. So, when it is a resume type of leadership representation, more supporting evidence is needed to integrate the entire PPT as one piece of a leader for a specific organization. That PPT is how I filled in missing links of evidence support and theoretical relates to make it an assessment of myself for the leadership eligibility of this specific organization. I like its PPT format a lot because it focuses on research links for evidence support and theoretical relates, but less stressful in making it literature smooth as well, which is more ideally for my immigrant technology background.
3: What MBA concentration I enrolled in that highlights leadership capability?
My response:
From my MBA graduation reflective essay: "When I applied for MBA education, I was interviewed about why I want to have an MBA and what will be my concentration, I said I want to know how I can start my own business, I want to learn where to start if I walk into a for-rent space. The concentration program I enrolled in isGeneral Administration（常务管理）".
After this leadership course MBA513 and the current capstone course I am learning, which need to use all that I have learned in MBA education to conduct assessment for myself and for the organization, "I have the confidence that I have learned knowledge that enables me to lead an organization to face its challenges, or to start a small own business(reflective essay)".
4: Do I realize MBA educated leadership is a calculating & analyzing job as well, not just an articulating job?
My response: Well, I have a Master degree and the hands-on experiences as a good computer programmer which is a doer profession based on computation, a science of calculation and measurement, that I don't think I need to prove that I can also do mathematics financially. My understanding of mathetics in finance is that I need to learn those formulas' theory background and applicable range to know how to use formulas in financial analyzing, which we have some homework assignment for learning and practicing purpose already. But, I have no problem to post a very simple mathematic financial analysis I did in school's MBA573 discussion post. It is investor interesting calculation regarding the required rate of return and stock purchase return:
02-08-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （14）-- 我不是南师大附中85届2班的同学
听说了难以理解为什么及究竟是什么样的矛盾，举个例子：大学毕业30年之后，你在一个完全陌生的城市有了自己的事业，自己的朋友和专业领域的成就。在你因为专业领域的成就而很骄傲时，却被人误解你在这个城市的朋友及你的专业领域的工作社交圈才是你能够在专业领域成功的原因。而你也因为多年和大学的同一个专业的同班同学们没有联络，你也没有将这误会放在心上。结果，你听说你的一个大学同班同学为了自己事业也能成功，就派出了他的妹妹团，只要听说是你的朋友熟人工作关系，他的一个妹妹就会是其挚爱心仪，他也很自信他自己有足够多的妹妹，让你走的哪里都有他的一个花巨资整容过的性感妹妹坐在你同事朋友工作关系的大腿上，就为了知道你是如何成功的，就不信没有可能不取代你，就不信没有可能不将你赶出你自己的生活工作的圈子，你会如何理解这些动作？这和你是否满意你自己的婚恋私人生活相关吗？如果你听说是你所毕业的这个大学这一年这专业的全班参与甚至全届参与，甚至这个大学的历届校友都有参与，你会如何理解？
在国外，虽然很多人（包括政府机关执法人员及华人）都难以相信我有拿到丰厚智慧专利的能力成就，但也都知道都是在公开场合众人亲眼看见我自己创造，包括我在电脑方面的成就，也都是全程每分每秒都在公司办公室在所有同事面前所成就的。真是没什么好解释的。
其实，要解释也就是如此了：1）我从初中高中开始，老师就普遍都知道我的学习方法很好，也就是研究中所需的探索总结研究命题的能力很强；2）也是从初中高中开始，老师也都知道我的举一反三的能力很强，想问题也很周到，这就是研究中从事物发展中的取得理论联想启发的能力很强；3）很多认识我的人也都知道我对事物很敏锐很敏感，我的眼睛视力不好但很尖，这其实就是研究中所需要的观察能力很强。
在从事研究工作所需的基本三要素我都很强的情况下，这还是众所周知我三者都很强的情况下，一旦有研究工作的机遇，有些研究上的成就怎么就是不可能的呢？
现在能和以前的老师们说的，就是从事研究工作是有副作用的：我现在已经不是以前那个灵动的方敏了，你们要是见过我爸爸方文海，你们就可以想象我现在是什么样子了，据说看人接物一举一动都神似。我是从2004年就已经离开了研究工作岗位，所以我目前还没那么惨，就是还是难以想象这人居然是当年的那个方敏。不知还要多久，才有可能让人感觉我是可以和凡人沟通的。
----2019年2月11日
究竟我和南师大附中85届2班及其他一些人的矛盾究竟是什么？因为我听到的传言让我觉得实在寒心。我听说的是：南师大附中一些人在2004年6月7月的时候因为参加了电话会议，看到了一些名人和我交谈，很愿意走入我的社交圈。我估计，他们点吧点吧他们自己没什么特别的资本，又不甘于自己创造他们自己的社交圈，就设下计谋用集体的力量把一些女人屁股挤入到这个那个我可能会聊得挺开心的恋爱或非恋爱关系的男人腿上，以他们的屁股做为资本就是一定要走入我的社交圈，让我走到哪儿都得给他们的屁股一个面子以知道我自己他妈的其实什么都不是而已。
我方敏本人从小学时期就很独立，基本上都是独来独往，和同学友人之类的交往有限，更从未介入任何友人或同学的私人社交圈，所以难以理解这种企图。我本人更是难得在别人家里留宿，真实就是我在外的非旅馆留宿而没睡在我自己床上的总次数是屈指可数的，而我现在却是一直都需要面对“既使是要砸烂了我婚姻家庭的门才能走进我的家，他们也一定要进入到我的婚姻家庭里，过一份他们就是一定要过的美好日子”的这一份威胁。
我听到的当年国内友人的如今愤怒要求都是：作为朋友同学或者不常往来的亲戚，他们凭什么就是不可以住到我家？他们的老婆凭什么就是不可以长期睡在我的卧室隔壁？他们的老婆就是不乐意在他们探访我期间由我另外安排住宿，他们的老婆就是一定要住在我自己的主要起居住所的我自己的卧室隔壁。我的愤怒就是为什么必须由他们选择我在那里接待他们探访？为什么他们就是必须介入我的私人生活？就此，我一直是在寻求法律的保护，我方敏本人坚决拒绝我方敏的私人生活被如此计算被如此打扰。
02-05-2019 我的亲朋送礼计划 (15) ---- My online gifting idea -- 《亲朋礼相关的困扰》
About the rumor regarding my undergraduate diploma.
My response: I heard the rumor was sparked by an announcement that the Chinese Education Department decided to revoke my undergraduate diploma on the radio. But I also heard that announcement was made by a Mr. Ding who was never employed by the Chinese Education Department but a son of my grandfather's former private assistant Mr. Ding. Came from Shanghai, he has a job in the affiliated company of the Chinese Education Department in Beijing since 1984.
It has been so ridiculous all this time how it has circled around in Chinese community abroad. The truth is, a graduation diploma can only be evaluated and granted by the academic professor committee assigned by the college, never grantable nor revokable by the Educational Department. An employee from the Education Department would certainly know this.
12-05-2018 I graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a BS degree, both were never revoked (我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效)
----Feb. 5th, 2019
有关我的大学毕业文凭被中国教育部宣布无效的传闻。
我的回应：我听说这个传闻是由广播剧的一次播出所引发的。广播剧在一次播出中宣布中国教育部已经决定取消我的大学毕业文凭是造成流言蜚语的原因。我也听说了在广播剧上宣布的那个人就是我爷爷以前那个上海丁姓私人助理的一个儿子。他从来不是中国教育部的工作人员，他是自1984年到北京后在北京的中国教育部的一个三产公司工作。一直就是觉得在海外华裔社区闹得轩轩洋洋的这种传言实在是莫名其妙的很离谱了。
事实上，一个大学的本科毕业文凭，都是只能由该大学所指定的教授学术评鉴委员会所评估核发的，从来就不是作为中国各高校大学的政府行政管理机构的教育部可以评鉴授予的，也没有可能是由教育部所取消的。所以我就说啊，做宣布的那人要真是中国教育部的工作人员，就应该会很清楚这一点的。
12-05-2018 I graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a BS degree, both were never revoked (我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效)
----2019年2月5日
听说了一些说法，意思是中国政府立场就是说人死了就绝了，是不会有人需要问一句的。
所以，我是一直说啊，中国政府要是一个共和国的人民政府，就没有可能闭着眼睛说瞎话，更不可能说人死了就绝了，不需要法律，不需要职责，更不需要人民，就只要中国的金库钥匙可以拿得到。
----2019年2月5日
为什么有血缘关系就是不可以随便拿我的钱花？为什么任何人都必须我同意才可以花我的钱？
我的回应：首先就是因为我对你们任何人都没有任何法律上的抚养责任义务，就算是一些友善亲戚，而不是一些我方敏及我的父母听也没听说过的血缘关系，你们家的工资奖金存款，我方敏及我的父母也从未分到过一分一毫，也就只是收到过一些你们愿意给的礼物礼金。怎么我方敏自己的工资奖金存款，你们有血缘关系就必须分多少必须拿多少，否则就是不行，就算是要砸了我方敏的家也一定要拿到这份钱？究竟我方敏的哪一分哪一厘的工资奖金存款是拿了你们这些血缘关系的钱？我方敏为什么就应该被你们这些血缘关系如此恐吓威胁？我也已经就我方敏自己的存款（信托继承）做了很多解释了，我方敏也多次表达了我认为就算我的存款是源自某个男人指定给我的裤裆钱，也不是我方敏做为一个女人就因此欠了你们这些血缘关系没被你们自己男人支付给你们他们这些你们自己男人自己咂了你们自己奶头的钱的立场。
我的愤怒就在于我认为你们的要求是基于你们认为我应该死绝了就好，我方敏本人及我的父母我的所爱根本就不需要有钱花也根本就不需要有日子过，更不应该花我方敏自己的钱，所以你们才会觉得我愿意赠送的每年2千万美金的亲朋礼实在是吝啬的离谱，所以你们才会愤怒为什么我方敏居然认为我方敏自己的钱应该由我方敏自己决定怎么花，也就是你们也根本没有任何亲戚情分，所以，我拒绝你们这个根本就是勒索的要求，我也会寻求法律保护。
----2019年2月5日
你怎么还在说你有钱？这个那个男人不都已经是别的女人嘴里她自己的男人了吗？
我的回应：所以说啊，实在是烦得不得了唉。都已经一次次的讲了，我的钱不是什么男人的裤裆钱。今天就再多讲如下几句：
男人的钱包，就在男人自己的裤子口袋里；男人自己的裤子口袋，就在男人自己的男性具的两边；所以，当你说这个男人那个男人的阳具都已经在你嘴里含着了，你就别到处说你居然不知道同一个男人的钱包在哪里，或者说你自己嘴忙着的时候，闲着的的手居然没够得着同一个男人的钱包。
至于说某个女人的这个那个她自己男人家里的爷爷爸爸传下来的钱在哪里，跑来找我质问就更是某名奇妙了。
----2019年2月5日
02-03-2019 Intellectual Income related explanation
1: Ingonyama title is in the local language, but I came from China?
My response: There are two possibilities for how I got this entitlement officially on June 30th of 2004.
1) I received the original entitlement, given by my ancient Emperor grandfather in Chinese, together with my Trust-Inheriting, Ingonyama its translation in the local language, or
2) this is the entitlement of my ancient grandfather's that I inherited together with the my Trust-Inheriting as the direct-beneficiary-heir of the entitled ancient grandfather of mine.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
2: Even if I was a very good computer programmer who learned macroeconomy, how could I be impressed as good at financial risk management?
My response: A common practice in computer programming is error & exceptional handling for programming or run-time situations, the better in programming practices, the less chances a software will behave weirdly in the office or home usage, which means less user-panics for "I didn't do anything, it went dark and I can't bring it up" or "I can't find my files anywhere, I was just trying to check some spellings, where is my file folder now?", etc. All these reasons for possible panic, anxiety, etc. are called financial risks in sciences related to the economy or finance. Of course, it helps a computer programmer to understand risk management if this error &exceptional handling concepts can be borrowed into financial related analyzing, Plus, I was a computer programmer specialized in computer security who was very sensitive about network-hacking.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
3: How can I make so many intellectual incomes by "just a couple of lines" ideas?
My response: Well, it is well-known that nobody believes that I can finish the CDSA-secure data-transfer project and the no-password-login project in less than total 4 years time, and nobody believes I can know so much about computer's operating system to contribute in revolutionary smartphone invention, but I did these two projects, every second and from start to finish, right in the office and in front of everyone in the office, which was verified minute-by-minute during the project-evaluation.
How this related to the question? It means I must have saved a lot of time in wondering for "what's the next hypothesis?" in that research, either because I have been talented on this, or because I may have learned something about it during the research process. And a lot of times, a good hypothesis is the critical reason for a successful project, which may be the reason that those of my "just a couple of lines" ideas have been valuable-ly helpful and appreciate-ly recognized.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
4: A lot asked why the evaluating group can value "less" my intellectual contribution by compensating other research personnel, such as the story of Viagra's clinical research team?
My response: The evaluation is the combined result of the academic value plus the years of service in the research team. My contribution was evaluated "less" because of the lack of service years in the research team.
Also, my contribution was the budget saving to the lab research and early-starting of the clinical research, so my contribution story has the episode that I was not welcomed by the lab-research team but so welcomed by the clinical research team.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
02-01-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （12-A）--- 南师大附中校友的海外名作篇
听说今天早上南京市和江苏省政府对于我父亲方文海就是死了没可能活着的说法。
01-30-2019 Modern Contemporary and Classic Tradition
I was often doubted how I can claim I am a Chinese Emperors' heir without the People's Republic of China's acknowledgment? I say because the heirship is by the blood and family inheriting rule, not by the People.
----Jan. 30th, 2019
I was often confronted with as long as the Chinese government does not acknowledge, I say only because you are such a barbarian who doesn't know THE CLASS represents the culture with history, not just modern contemporary of round-shape impressionism or functional consciousness that you heard of.
----Jan. 30th, 2019
So I was asked, but how do I say I am truthful on the matter after my own family lost track of the family stories? I say by confronting matter and probing for an answer. Let's see how many doubts about the matter so far.
1: The paintings published on the internet in 2011 were all one-year-old copies,
I heard they were all from the digital version of the originals that each comes with a year certificate.
2: The year certificate has the year 1927, year 1970...on it.
I heard it represents the edition of the photo, the copied-from edition is a digital version.
3: How these paintings relate me to be the heir of the featured Emperors?
First of all, both my father and I resemble my Emperor-ancestors featured in these family portraits.
Second, my 2004's Trust-inheriting was a birthmark-inheriting(updated on Feb. 3rd, 2019)
Also, I own Emperor equivalent entitlements such as Ingonyama etc. originated by them, and I own these family portraits gifted by them since my lawfully valid willed Trust-Inheriting in 2004.
As so popular in a lot of Kingdom-novels, a King normally gift a person with an entitlement, some valuables (gold, jewelry, etc.), and a beauty.
Well, I am the daughter gifted by my ancient birth Emperor-grandfathers, so I only received entitlements and valuables from my Trust-Inheriting, which means I need to find my handsome, with my ancestors' blessing but won't be an assigned.
----Jan. 30th, 2019
1: Ingonyama title is in the local language, but I came from China?
My response: There are two possibilities for how I got this entitlement officially on June 30th of 2004.
1) I received the original entitlement, given by my ancient Emperor grandfather in Chinese, together with my Trust-Inheriting, Ingonyama its translation in the local language, or
2) this is the entitlement of my ancient grandfather's that I inherited together with the my Trust-Inheriting as the direct-beneficiary-heir of the entitled ancient grandfather of mine.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
01-28-2019 How a novel, a TV series, or a radio program(show) is evaluated and granted to be published.
Another anger I often encounter is the anger from talented literature people: Why I can have the privilege of being the major featured person of this radio program?
I once said I never read scripted lines that every joke or thought was my own articulation as a plus, I said this has been accumulated over the years because the audio raw materials have been from my security tape which has started recording every second since the moment I was born. Some said they all have this type of audio raw material as well, why their thoughts and their articulation are not this privileged? I say they had never thought of so before 2004 was the reason that I was privileged, and they possibly won't persist on publishing their privileges currently because of the sensitiveness from whom have been participating in their thoughts-sharing.
I once expressed my understanding about those English majored literature person, about their anger why it is so easy for me to be recognized in their profession knowing I was never a literature person? I will explain this as much as possible from the knowledge I recently learned from MBA.
The process of how to evaluate and to grant an opportunity to publish a novel, a TV series, or a radio program (show). （小说，电视剧和广播剧的遴选发行的程序是什么？）
Step 1: When a publishing representative producer(editor) is approached with a piece of work, this producer need to evaluate this piece of work's academic value, and if good, to recommend to publishing executives:（编辑初选）
1)Theme evaluation based on the trends of the readers' choice:（对于作品题材的初选）
Step 2: When a publishing executive received a recommendation from a publishing representative producer (editor), this executive need to evaluate the overall value of publishing this piece of work, and if good, to recommend to publishing financing executive for funding of publishing.（主编筛选）
1) Based on if publishing can upgrade this publishing company's academic value.（学术价值文学价值很高)
2) Based on if publishing can be a best-seller, profitable, etc. (是否可以盈利）
3) Based on if publishing can fulfill publishing company's social responsibility. (保护地球之类的题材，类似中国的政治任务）
...
Step 3: When a publishing financing executive received a recommendation from a publishing executive, the publishing financing executive will make funding evaluation, and if good, to recommend to publishing CEO to print.（是否能挤进有限的出版指标？）
1) Based on if profitable and how profitable it can be, (根据是否可以盈利值得投资）
2) Based on if easy to raise special funding from somewhere,（发行费用是否可以筹措）
...
Step 4: When the publishing CEO received a recommendation from a publishing financing executive, the publishing CEO need to evaluate possible sales if publish and if worth a try, to grant the pilot publishing. （出版总编的总评估，是否可以短时间小批量的实验性发行）
1) Based on experience from company's publishing history,（根据公司以前的类似销售纪录）
2) Based on distribution channels feedback. (销售点会不会进货？）
....
Step 5: When the pilot time finished, the publishing CEO will make the decision of official publishing if funding is not an issue. （实验性发行结束后，出版总编会作出是否正式发行的决定）
1) Based on the rating(sales) during the pilot time. (实验性发行期间的收听率，销量）
2) Based on the profitability during the pilot time, from sales or advertising income.（实验性发行期间的销售额和广告收入）
3) Based on if enlarged producing can have funding and how much. (扩大发行需要多少资金）
...
How I was granted pilot publishing(broadcasting) as a major featured person? （我是如何获得试发行的机会成为广播剧的主要人物的？）
1) The pass of Step 3 and 4: I heard on July 1st of 2004, some distribution channels already giving "will participate in broadcasting" feedback, investor-funding was granted, both during the meeting. （第三步和第四步：当时在2004年7月1日的会上，就有广播公司（就是我的生活费用给付的合法性核实的6+1个国家的）表态会参与播出，（就是我的生活费用给付的付款公司）表态会参与投资，还有一些的个人投资, 听说是一百万美金一个，共7百万投资。
2) The pass of Step 5: I heard only one-month pilot broadcasting already generated good rating and good advertising income to cover full-scale producing and publishing (broadcasting) and to be handsomely profitable to the publishing company (radio company). （第五步，我听说一个月的实验性发行结束后，收听率就已经很高，所产生的广告收入也已经可以由广播剧的广告收入本身提供资金支持广播剧的最大发行量出版了，广播公司的收益预计可以很可观。）
3) The pass of Step 2: I heard the reason is: This radio program is the first time uniqueness in radio broadcasting history: Reality show produced from audio raw materials collected from the major featured person's historically accumulated security tape. （第二步，我听说筛选通过的原因是：这个广播剧由主要人物的保安影像记录提供该人物的历史语音资料作为广播剧制作的制作素材资料是广播史上的第一次。）
----Jan. 28th, 2019
Why some Mrs. Rockefellers and some Mrs. Fords have been so angry about me and the radio program?
My response: I assume, it was because I was not really even associated, while they are the married wives from the entertainment industry background but never have such a privilege in R and F names' family investments. The process of how step 3 and step 4 could be passed at the spot so immediately on July 1st of 2004 was not just unfair to them but also insulting to those who truly romantically involved and associated with.
But the truth was I am the heir Missy, not a wife nor a short romance, to my own birth ancient grandfathers' Trusts that have been investing in those 6+1 counties' participating broadcasting companies. This was explained at the moment already that they themselves have been interested to know who I am was the reason for the willingness to participate in the broadcasting distribution. These participating companies are not Ford name nor Rockefeller name majorly invested.
The work-centric evaluation based pass of step1 and professional evaluation based pass of step5 are the real true reasons for this radio program's public channel's longtime popular broadcasting.
----Feb. 7th, 2019
01-27-2019 How one's intellectual Income is evaluated? (智慧专利收入是如何评估的？）
I was asked often how I can earn intellectual income? I was so not a hard-working student when I was in school that no one from any school I graduated from could imagine I could possibly be a person who can have some intellectual income. I say this group of people also include those colleagues from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, but not from Janus Associates who watched me developed modules of Biogate, my first intellectual income. How I grew into a research type of person?
When I was assigned a job in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, I was a girly college newly graduated who fully welcomed leadership education from Health Department Inspectors I worked with. My work experiences there did not shape into a good lab research tester, but made me into a coercive leader-apprentice enjoyed the opportunities to say, "Do As I Said".
My second job was a computer programmer where I assigned to work on BioGate project, this work experience was when I learned "to form my own hypothesis independently, to discover dynamics in trending independently, and to relate complexities with theories independently. "(quoted from my personal statement of schooling)
Currently, I am in training to be a business leader which means I am in process of being less research geek style but become more humanly understandable, I can tell it is not an easy process so far because still too many people complaining "don't know what she is saying".
Ok, after I briefly explained why I do have some intellectual incomes, let me try to explain how my share of intellectual incomes is evaluated from the best of my knowledge.
Intellectual Incomes evaluation process:
Step 1: When a research project is successfully finished and ready for sale, the first step is to evaluate how much is the price this project can ask.
This project price evaluation would be conducted by a professional evaluation company, and evaluation is based on how much time and cost would be needed in average to conduct such research by an average peer in the industry. This project evaluation would detail each module and each component of the entire project to have a price as the negotiation base for the research company to bargain with possible buyers.
Step 2: After a successful sale of the research project, the research company would decide the size of rewarding package for the entire group of all kinds of contributors to this research project. The rewarding company would also decide the share for each contributor group, such as research group, helping group, and etc in the company's level of the rewarding package.
Step 3: Once research group's rewarding package size is decided, the research department will evaluate rewarding shares for each component's research group, which is based on the project price evaluation report of each component as well as research participating years.
Step 4: Once each component's rewarding size is decided, each individual contributor's share to this same component can be evaluated based on each academic contribution.
How can my brief idea contribute intellectually?
Let's see the example of my idea to have a hair growth product based on 章光101(?). My idea is a concept hypothesis and the academic direction of a research project. If I contributed, its market price should also be in the project evaluation report as a component, and I will be evaluated with the contributors of this same component.
How to tell public relation help with research contribution help?
From my own experience: When research got stuck, help can be from public relation if the research company does not have internal resources to help out. This internal helping resource is also the reason why researchers from a big research company have much less share in their company's rewarding packages. And IRS has the standard to different research contribution help with public relation help to ensure the correct income tax rate.
----Jan. 27th, 2019
很多人经常问我，我哪有可能会有智慧专利收入？读书时，我确实不是一个用功的学生，我所毕业的每一所学校，就没人相信我居然可以有智慧专利收入。我说这拨人还得加上我曾经工作过的南京市药品检验所，不过我的第二份工作，就是美国的电脑公司的同事就不会这么说了，因为他们都是亲眼看着我一天一点的做出了Bio Gate这个研究项目。那我究竟是如何成长为一个研究人员的？
当我大学毕业分配到南京市药品检验所上班时，我就只是一个大学刚毕业的女孩，特别喜欢跟着卫生局药品监督室的工作人员学习当领导，这第一个工作没让我成为一个实验室的强手，而是让我有机会练习独立强硬的领导风格，我也非常喜欢练习这一句“就照我说的办”。
我的第二份工作是电脑程序员，接到的项目就是Bio Gate。是这份工作的研究经历让我学会了自己"独立的决定研究方向，独立的发现变化中的动态界定因素，独立的将研究所经历的复杂性与相应的理论相联系。”（摘自我自己写的一份上学用的《自我介绍》）
目前，我因为在读MBA的企业管理，所以我正在努力让自己少一点研究人员“不理世俗事”的倔强，多培养一点可让凡人都可沟通的理解，不过我很清楚这过程不那么简单，目前还是有太多人在抱怨“根本就不知道她在说什么做什么”。
好了，简略地说清楚了我确实是有智慧专利收入的，我来尽我的能力解释一下智慧专利收入都是如何评估的。
智慧产权的评估过程：
第一步：当一个研究项目成功且可以出售时，第一步就是对这个研究额项目可能的市场价值做个评估。
01-23-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （12）--- 刘凯故事的播出制作
（我一直在做解释，就因为我一直在被这个问题困扰: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗？自1985年从高中毕业到现在这么多年，我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，能管你们这些同一个高中毕业的什么事？怎么都应该被你们吆喝“凭什么”？还要联合起来对付我？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，我就欠了你们的了？听说他们的愤怒居然是: 他们就是难以相信我居然敢把钱直接放进自己的口袋里？我的什么钱居然就是不可以放进我自己的口袋里？！！！！南师大附中的：我在美国20年的过去就从未联系过你们，今后也不会需要联系你们。----2019年1月26日。）
我方敏是南师大附中85届2班毕业的，但我不是这个班毕业的其他人的同学。我已经学到了这个知识，我会终身记得的。我也听到了这个班毕业的其他人的声明，那是正常了，既不是朋友，又不是同学，还能是什么态度还能说些什么话？我也是这样了。----2019年1月27日。
有人说，我是否需要如此立场，我方敏态度，如果我听说的传言真实，一切都是预谋，我方敏就认为我方敏是需要而且必须是如此立场态度。因为我方敏不愿因为认识了这些南师大附中毕业的，就被算计，就被暗算，就被陷害，就被设计而成为任何意义上的受害者。我目前是已经在法律保护下，我今后也会毫不犹豫需求法律保护而不被这些人骚扰，恐吓，威胁。----2019年1月31日。
（听说刘凯已和她的儿子在美国团圆，听说目前各方也都在按照她本人的意愿保护她的新的婚姻。如果听到今天早上的播出内容，就应该很清楚所宣布的就是我不可能是弄清传言是否真实的人选。就此类声明传言，我方敏只会强调我方敏的私人财产和这些名字人物统统无关，也不是他们的婚姻伴侣所可以任意占领的，我也已经就这些传言报警处理。如对有关刘凯的传言有任何疑问，请接洽南师大附中高中85届2班的其他在美同学，我和这些85届的（包括在波士顿的），甚至南师大附中的其他校友统统都没有联络，今后也不会有任何联络。----2019年1月24日。）
听说，在南师大附中校友中，很多人非常气愤的是刘凯婚姻家庭故事的制作播出对刘凯本人生活所造成的负面影响。
我先说明并请查实：
1：我本人从未参与广播剧的制作，也从未听到过广播剧的制作版本或播出版本。
2：我听说的，广播剧有关刘凯故事的制作是在国内制作，所采用的是由刘凯授权的国内商业运作模式剪辑制作宣传促销。
我听说的，刘凯本人的难以理解在于为什么她的故事只是有限收入，而非百分比的利润提成？刘凯的愤怒是为什么她被“如此当众处罚”， 而我却是按百分比提成？在可以查实上述两点说明的前提下，我对此的解释：
1：广播剧是在2005年在美国广播公司上线播出，2007年年底左右被中国进口在中国播放。刘凯的故事在国内可以被商业制作就是因为有这个热播的广播剧作为播放平台，而我按百分比利润提成就是广播公司对于我的人生经历对广播剧热播贡献的奖励。也就是俗话说的，如果没有我的这个热播中的广播剧作为播放渠道，刘凯的婚姻家庭故事就卖不出一个子。
(我和美国制作团队的提成和投资人一样，是在美国的广播剧发行总公司的利润里提取，而作为我曾经的高中同学大学同学等等参与广播剧制作的，有适当的由制作中心从广播剧的制作费里所支付的参与酬谢金；或者类似刘凯这种，作为我曾经的高中同班同学参与广播剧制作，又同时有她自己独立的婚姻家庭故事的，所领取的是由制作中心从广播剧的制作费里所支付的故事费，所领取金额大小也是由制作中心根据中国美国相关法律，广播公司的公司规定和所参与制作的故事情节的可能收听率（也就是市场价值）所决定的，我方敏本人完全没有参与价格的制定。我听说的：美国制作中心对这些类似刘凯婚姻家庭的独立故事的制作规定是 1)故事的市场吸引力，至少是可以让广播剧继续保持已有的收听率，2）制作费用不得高于多少 ---- 2019年1月26日更新）
（类似于综艺节目来说明，中国制作中心类似是特邀评审，这些独立故事人物就是类似综艺节目的特约嘉宾，美国制作团队和我的基本人生经历故事制作就是在保持该综艺节目的收视率，这样，这些特邀评审和特约嘉宾可以有参与制作费甚至可以高一些。----2019年2月8日）
（我和广播剧美国制作团队能够拿到广播公司给予的百分比提成作为奖励，就是因为我的人生经历和制作团队的努力将广播剧制作成了一个非常成功的播放平台，这点就类似于国内的综艺节目，支持人和采编团队的努力就是让综艺类节目成为了一个可以让参与节目的人一炮而红的播放平台。刘凯的故事及其他的参与者就是因为有了这么一个播放平台才可以有每集的参与制作费用及故事费。如果广播剧不是一个盈利的播出平台，刘凯的故事在中国包括江苏人民广播电台的播出（综艺或者社会探讨栏目）都是不会有任何故事费可以领取的，更不用说其他人只是在广播上说几句话就可以拿到的丰厚参与费用了。因为一切费用的支付都是根据美国中国的法律及行规而给付的，所以，我（的收入）和刘凯的故事究竟如何给付也没有任何直接关系。---- 2019年1月26日更新）
(听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。
我的回应是：这是误会。首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍，
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民和东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人而很多没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。----2019年2月26日）
我一直也被这个问题困扰: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗，怎么个我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，都应该被你们吆喝？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，就欠了你们的了？
我一直也被这个问题困扰: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗，怎么个我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，都应该被你们吆喝？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，就欠了你们的了？
我本人在2015年2016年时期，也一再就国内一些人士认为他们自己也可以让任何广播剧成功而表态：各个国家的广播公司很多，频道很多，时段也很多，为什么不找广播公司推销你们自己故事，做你们自己的广播剧？非得砸了我的广播剧？这不是钱的问题，或者广播剧是不是播出时间太长该下线了的问题，是我本人的名誉受到很大影响。
美国方面很多人也有国内类似看法，所以从2015年年底开始，他们替换了整个制作团队，对我进行痛骂打砸，并大幅增加其他人物故事，以区分并呈现不同，就为使用这同一个热播平台展现各自才华。我听说的，从2016年3月起，广播剧就不再热播，并造就一堆的投诉和法律问题，我本人是从2015年年底起就本人名誉受损一再报警。
2：刘凯的婚姻家庭故事的商业运作范围主要局限在中国，是因为这一类问题在美国属于法律处理的范围，没有中国国内的全民纠结。
在美国，一旦碰到孩子被证实是婚姻外所育这一类事情，做丈夫的，首先是搬出夫妻的共同居所，然后诉请离婚或婚姻无效，也就是寻求法律支持，拒绝支付孩子生活费用。这婚姻纠结就解决了，这婚姻家庭故事就结束了。这在美国是通识常识，没人会将刘凯婚姻家庭故事作为社会问题探讨，所以刘凯的婚姻家庭故事对世界其他法制先进国家的广播公司的吸引力有限。刘凯的故事在广播剧里的播出，播出内容其实并没有强调她的婚姻故事的对与错，而是强调中国的国情及美国的法律处理之间的差别。
我听说的，刘凯的收入中，1）一部分是由制作费用支付的，由国内的一家艺术中心从美国公司所支付的这几集的制作费用中支付的，2）还有很大一部分就是广播剧播出后的周边产品所产生的广告收入所支出的，也就是俗称的听众点评节目所吸引的广告，这一部分是由国内广播电台作为播放公司所支付的，我听说和刘凯的分成比例很高。据说美国没有类似的听众点评所产生的广告收入，刘凯就不会有美国方面的评论节目广播电台所支付的广告收入提成。至于其他亚洲国家是否有类似听众点评，应该可以向广播公司查询。
我本人广播剧收入的百分比提成是由各国购买节目及广告收入提成后的美国制作播出公司的总利润里提成的，也就是我的提成基数是在刘凯的收入作为广播公司的制作及促销播出的成本费用予以扣减后，才进行核算的，与刘凯故事的制作播出收入没有任何直接关系。
举例说明：
1：剧集播放版权的销售收入，按播放季节（年）计算。如果广播剧的剧集是1万元一集，每天一集，中国买一季（年）就是365万。当年由中国制作的刘凯节目只有几集。
2：广告收益提成，也是按播放季节（年）计算，主要收入都是在广播剧的主要播放时段所产生的，听众点评节目所产生的很少，而且不是固定收入（只有在一些听众点评节目愿意点评所播出的内容时才会有）。听说刘凯挨骂主要是因为听众点评节目。
3：如果按照合同，中国播出公司需要交给美国公司这一年由广播剧时段播段所产生的广告利润的50%，这也就是已经扣除了因为这几集而由刘凯本人所产生的听众点评相关的广告收入分成收入之后所计算出的利润，而且还是全年收入。
这两项，是美国广播公司的广播剧收入，还要再扣除美国方面的制作和推销的成本等等之后，才是我的百分比提成的计算基数。所以说，我的百分比提成和刘凯故事的商业运作没有直接关系。
我的意思就是：刘凯故事的2009年所制作的，后期剪辑成7天应该是美国团队，美国人因为很熟悉法律处理方式，没有中国国内对此类婚姻问题的一腔愤怒，所以，对她的婚姻应该没有任何对错的指责，也没有愤怒控诉，就只是报道中美对此婚姻问题的不同处理方式。播出前后，中国以外地区的收听率也应该不会有很大波动（这些都可以查核）。在中国，如果播出前后的收听率有很大波动，那就看一下广告客户广告收入是否有很大波动。就我所知，广播剧的广告收入来源主要是广播剧播出时段的广告收入，点评节目的广告收入份量很小。
如果刘凯本人或南师大附中的校友对我的解释有疑问，请接洽广播剧的制作播出公司以寻求真相。如果我本人言论与事实真相之间有重大区别，可以电邮给我予以纠正。电邮地址：somebodyinMA@gmail.com
----2019年1月23日。
刘凯故事的商业运作，可能是所有中国女人都可以对我方敏高吼：“就是要操了你的男人，就是要拿了你的钱，就是够资格“的原因。估计现在是掀锅盖的时候，来表达“你他妈的算老几”。我是在美国已经报警了。
据说是从2009年起，就实施了这份操作。她还在中国政府安排下，由别人付费整容后，特意与我喜欢的什么男人谈恋爱，不知真假，也不知是哪一个。据说就是2003年8-9月间我在华盛顿维州的Hyatt（假日酒店）大厅遇见的那一个，还一再强调，很确定就是同一个才。。。。
气的就是这份气势："他妈的，就是冲着这人是你喜欢的男人才要操的，中国政府就是有这个能力有这个实力拉这个皮条"。要是真实，中国政府根本就是妓院打杂的下贱本事下贱做法下贱有效，中国政府所呈现的本事能力，也就是妓院的打杂的就是会乘着替妓女拎个屎盆子出来倒倒的机会，顺便在你身上泼点，耍点小聪敏，就为恶心死你。
----2019年1月23日。
01-21-2019 与南京方面的矛盾(11) --- 广播剧制作和南师大附中85届2班（乙班）的刘凯 （A classmate from the high school )
听说刘凯前夫刘丹是否在和刘凯结婚之前已育有小孩，是造成刘凯婚姻困扰的原因，也是造成刘凯及很多南师大附中校友认为我1996年当时做法很离谱的原因。听说广播剧对此“是否有小孩”的报道是：英文用的是“Abortion”（流产，意即没有离开母体存活的小孩），中文用的是“引产”（可能有离开母体后存活的小孩） 。我本人是在1990年以后曾听刘凯说过刘丹很花心，但只在2015年以后才听说刘丹以前的恋爱故事花絮。
Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy by removal or expulsion of an embryo or fetus before it can survive outside the uterus.[note 1] （from： https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion ）
----2019年8月2日增。
I had never romantically associated or socially close to her ex-husband or his associated, in high school or after graduation.]
I don't have a male's middle section, and I don't have Liu, Kai's female middle section, please don't ever consult any money matter associated with any male's middle section nor Liu, Kai's female middle section. I am not the person care about this article featured Liu, Kai in any way nor anyhow.
I don't have a male's middle section, and I don't have other female's middle section but my own, please don't ever consult any money matter associated with any male's middle section nor any female's middle section except my own. I am not the person care about any matter associated with any male's middle section nor any female's middle section except my own.
(----updated on Jan. 22nd, 2019)
Liu, Kai graduated from the same class of 1985's Nanjing Teacher's College Affiliated High School. I heard radio program had featured some stories of her family and her marriage. Before I left China in 1996, I was not happy with her attitude about how she insisted on to let the entire world know "the only person would truly interest in me" was a happily married, aged and dwarf man from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, I was not tough on expressing myself strong opposite opinion because of the situation that I was leaving China for good.
When I visited her in China in 2007, her attitude toward me had been "who the fxxx you think you are?" and challenging. I truly don't think I need nor obligated to be in touch with this person, and I never contacted her ever since. I will never get in touch with such a person.
I heard about in 2010 that my round-trip ticket to the U.S. that I bought from another same class graduated in 1996 was ￥4000-5000 higher than it should be. I heard it was per her request which was after she voluntarily lent me ￥3000 which I had paid back by the end of 1997 with the amount of ￥4500.
In 2009, I heard rumors that she had a car accident in Nanjing which was right after the featured broadcasting of her stories, but I did not hear any negative reactions from the Chinese community in Boston, so I thought the rumor was either untrue or she came out OK. I heard recently that she never had such a car accident and she has been living with her son in the U.S. for some years already. I heard she may have participated producing the radio program, which I assume has been the reason of such base theme in the radio program as "who the fxxx you think you are?", "I do the exact opposite of whatever you say", and "you will be so lucky if you can ever be wanted sexually."
I heard she remarried well, and tons of rumors about how well her marriage has been. I declare I have independent finance from any male's middle section, and I will never have any financial association with this Liu, Kai, her family associated, and her marriage associated.
Other clarifications that I need to make:
1: About her maiden family before 1996. She told me that her mother's husband, a retired veteran in 1996, had been very nice to her, and always willing to handsomely answer her financial demands including her wedding costs in 1992. Her mother's apartment was related to her mother's workplace and, possibly registered in her mother's name. This was pretty much I had spilled in that 1996 conversation in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control.
2: About her own marriage. She told me during my 2007 visit that she had a divorce after 2004, her ex-husband paid her son's support monthly from Canada.
----Jan. 21st, 2019
我只是也是她的前夫的高中同班同学，在南师大附中上学期间及高中毕业以后，从未与其前夫甚至其前夫友好交往过密，既从未有过任何情愫，也鲜少社交往来。
我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了刘凯自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询刘凯自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。我不关心任何有关这个南师大附中85届2班毕业的刘凯的任何事情任何情形。
我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了其他的女人自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询任何其他女人自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。除了我自己的，我不关心任何男人阳具任何女人屁股所牵涉的任何事物包括金钱事物。
南京传言我给了南师大附中高中85届2班的这人那人什么钱，对其他人非常不公平，我方敏声明这是从未发生过的事，我方敏也不知困扰疑问是什么。2004年7月1日那天我所做的金钱安排都有当时的会议记录可供查寻，我现在就是基本上可以很肯定没有做过此种安排。
（----2019年1月22日更新）。
刘凯是南师大附中85届2班的毕业的，据说广播剧曾经报道过她的家庭及婚姻。我是1996年离开中国前，因为1996年南京市药检所的绯闻事件，对于刘凯1996年在事件中立场是强调让大众知情那才是“唯一会爱”我方敏的而很反感，但因即将出国而未采取强硬立场表达我方敏本人态度。2007年我回中国探亲期间，感受到其始终对我方敏保持挺着脖子较劲对着干的态度，我方敏认为没有任何需要也没有任何责任义务和刘凯保持任何联络，2007年离开南京后就再未联络，我今后也永远不会联络。
我是2010年前后才听说我1996年离开中国时，在刘凯以同学名义借给我3000元人民币后，刘凯和傅萍联手将价值5000-6000元人民币的赴美往返飞机票以一万元人民币的价格卖给我，而我本人在1997年年底左右就以1：1.5的比例偿还了刘凯人民币共计4500元。
在2009年，我在美国听说了刘凯可能在南京出车祸的消息，但波士顿华人社区似乎无人听说，我也认为可能消息是假或者她本人安然无恙。现在听说她当时没有出车祸，目前她是和她儿子在美国生活，可能有参与广播剧的制作是我认为造成广播剧情调充斥“你他妈的算老几”，“你说东我就偏要朝西”，“你能有人要就不错了”等等情怀的原因。
听说她本人有再婚，传言很多，我方敏强调我方敏财务独立，和任何有钱男人的财务都无关，也与刘凯现在及今后的可能的生活不可能有任何财务交往。
我方敏所需做的其他相关说明：
1：1996年以前刘凯的家庭生活，她本人和我说的，她母亲的丈夫对她很好，刘凯本人20多岁时婚前婚后都很愿意按照刘凯要求给予经济资助，刘凯结婚所需费用也是由他出资。刘凯家里当时的住所当时是因刘凯母亲单位分房而得，估计是登记在刘凯母亲名下。这基本上就是1996年我在离开药检所之前和别人所说的。
2：刘凯自己的婚姻生活。2007年我回南京探亲，刘凯本人亲自和我谈及，她本人2004年后离婚，其前夫（也是高中同班同学）每月从加拿大支付她所生儿子的生活费用。
----2019年1月21日。
01-20-2019 My money is law matter, never a debatable political matter.（我的遭遇是法律事物而不是政治问题）
I am often asked why I insist on to make my horrible experience a law matter instead of a political matter?
My answer: The difference between law matters and political matters is the same distinctive as the difference between civil law matter and criminal law matter.
My horrible experience is not a political matter but a law matter
1: Because I am not a public official of the United States or of the People's Republic of China, but a commoner citizen in the United States.
2: Because my wealth is not tax-payers' money collected from citizens of the United States or citizens of the People's Republic of China, but my private wealth inherited from my birth grandfathers.
Taking my money is not a civil law matter but a criminal law matter because:
1: There is no argument if I am the sole beneficiary person according to the money-giver's wish.
2: There is no argument if money is lawfully given to me exclusively.
This is precisely the reason I say it has been ridiculous for producing radio program to debate if I could possibly have some money. If I have money is a law matter, never a debatable political matter.
I heard this morning's debate is all about why I should be the one having lawful ownership, which is also never a debatable political matter but a law matter.
----Jan. 20th, 2019
经常有人问我，为什么一定要坚持我的遭遇应该是法律事物而不是政治问题？
我的回答：法律事务和政治问题的区别是很明确的，就像刑法案件和民法纠纷之间的区别一样非常明确。
我的悲惨遭遇是法律事物而不是政治问题，就在于
1：我不是美国或者中国的政府官员，只是美国的一个普通公民。
2：我的财产不是中华人民共和国或者美国的纳税人缴纳的税收而来，我的财产是由继承了亲生爷爷的信托而来的私人财产。
拿走我的钱是刑法案件而非民事纠纷，就在于：
1：我是每一笔钱的给钱者所愿意给钱的唯一受益人，这点是无可争议的。
2：每一笔给我的钱都是合法支付给我一人独自使用的，这点也是无可争议的。
所以我说老在那里辩论来逻辑推理我应不应该有钱，简直是某名奇妙。我是否有钱是法律事务，不是什么可辩论的政治问题。
听说今天早上是在辩论为什么就必须是我的钱？这也是法律问题，不是什么可辩论的政治问题。
----2019年1月20日。
据说一些89年学运在美国的一直很气愤我为什么在2004年取消了他们的工资钱。
我就一直说，我哪有可能取消美国的国会批准给他们的工资钱？那钱是美国国库的开支，就像美国的联邦雇员的工资一样，只有美国的国会可以做决定，州政府的开销及州府雇员的工资只能是由州政府做决定一样，我根本从来就不是美国政府的联邦或者州府官员，那有可能搭界？
就像我的财产是私有财产，美国的国会或者美国的联邦或者州政府官员也不可能决定一样，完全不搭界。
我就是认为他们当时只有三十几岁，都有美国公民身份，也就是再找一份工作做做，没什么了不起的。
2004年以前，我是在美国的私营公司工作，和美国国库的关系就是缴税，对国库的开支等等并不关心，也就是和普通老百姓一样，会为一些传说中的国库的不合理开销而气愤气愤。但当时因为牵涉到的都是一批89年学运人士，很多也就是留学美国的和我前后几届的大学毕业的，所以也没有特别的气愤，就只是觉得他们重新找份工也没什么了不起的。
----2019年1月20日。
01-19-2019 Who should be the one to help me in such a situation? （究竟谁是能帮到我的？）
Heard about curiosity, from a lot of people, who would be responsible to help me out of my current situation.
Law enforcement is the answer, but how? I will explain what I know step by step.
1: If a family has family stories about a possible Trust but nobody informs anyone from the family to inherit it.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation and, if true, will replace entrusting attorney(s), etc. on behave of the beneficiary patron(s), and will ensure newly assigned (by a Judge) entrusting attorney(s) will inform the beneficiary patron(s) of the family to inherit the Trust. But no law enforcing personnel will need to contact the beneficiary family unless for investigation purpose.
Entrusting attorney(s) do not pay out money according to the agreement, law enforcing involvement is similar to this.
2: If similar to my situation, which is I can't receive those on time paid-out from my inherited Trusts.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation upon my complaints, to track down why, and to ensure I can receive the paid-out from my inherited Trusts, but no law enforcing personnel will contact me unless for investigation purpose. All I know would be I will receive letters that include some deposited credit cards, or informing me about my banking access information of how much money. Law enforcing will also ensure I can receive such letter(s) even if I have to change my mailing address for some reasons.
3: If similar to my situation of intellectual incomes, which is I don't know for certain but positive about if I have intellectual income or how much.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation upon my inquiry and, if true, will ensure I receive intellectual income that is evaluated and paid by the rewarding company, but no law enforcing personnel will contact me unless for investigation purpose. All I know would be I will receive an informing letter, or together with a paying check. Law enforcing will also ensure I can receive such letter(s) even if I have to change my mailing address for some reasons.
----Jan. 19th, 2019
很多人很好奇，像我现在这种情况，究竟谁是能帮到我的？
答案是：警方。我会就我所知道的做一步一步的解释。
1：如果家里传下来的故事说是家里老人有财产，或者是办过信托之类的，但没人通知家里任何人继承。
答案：警方接到这类查询投诉，会进行调查，如果属实，警方会代表这家受益人的利益，通过法庭更换信托或财产的受委托律师，再确保由法庭所指定的新的受委托律师通知这家的受益人继承财产。除非有调查取证的需要，否则不会有警方人员和这个家庭的任何联络。
2：如果类似我的情况，也就是收不到已经继承了的信托所支付的金钱给付。
答案：警方接到我的投诉，会进行调查原因，会保证我收到我已经继承了的信托所按时支付的金钱给付，但除非警方人员的调查需要，否则不会有警方人员和我联络。我就只会接到一些信件，每个里面有一张已存入了预定的给付金额的信用卡，或者是如何从某银行提取预定的给付金额的提款信息。警方也会确保我收到这些信件，不管我是否因为某些原因而必须更换收信地址。
3：如果类似我的情况，也就是不太确定但估计应该会有智慧产权收入。
答案：警方接到我的查询投诉，会进行调查，如果属实，警方会确保我收到由智慧专利的奖励公司评估并支付的智慧专利收入，但除非警方人员的调查需要，否则不会有警方人员和我联络。我就是会接到一份通知我有关智慧专利收入的信件，可能在这同一份信里就附了一张支票。警方也会确保我收到这些信件，不管我是否因为某些原因而必须更换收信地址。
----2019年1月19日。
01-18-2019 Weather forecasting style interview to argue about what already happened in the past（以天气预报形式做访谈以预期展望过去早已发生过事件）
Heard about this morning's arguments if I can have money. I heard this is the same 2016 producing team that completely ignored all factual truthful evidence but argued if I could possibly be the creator of Beijing Olympic Gaming Opening Ceremony（2008北京奥运会开幕式创意). Well, it is well known that "logically can't be me" was broadcast as the Chinese Central government's official announcement on the matter despite what the truth is together with factual evidence.
I heard the leader editor is an MBA graduated who obviously knows what is pro forma, predicting, and forecasting. So, this is the radio program interviewing for discussion of the past events using"logical arguments, weather forecasting style to forecast the chance of "what happened in the past" with the possibility presented in percentage. In this year of 2019, they are still predicting if I could possibly have inherited some money already in 2004!!!
据说今天早上又在争辩预报究竟我有没有钱了。据说这就是2016的同一个制作团队，就是那个完全无视事实依据和真相，就只用一些他们自己认为 “逻辑上来说不可能是方敏”的访谈评论和预期，将这些逻辑预期在2016年作为中国中央政府对于我是否是2008北京奥运会创意人的正式声明来播报的同一个制作团队。
我听说主要剪辑是个美国的工商管理硕士毕业的，估计就是因为学过专业的财政预算，经济政策金融风险的预期，以及经营融资收益预报的。所以，就用专业的预测，预算和预期来报道这些过去就已经发生过的种种事件，制作如此专业的“是逻辑类别的争辩，但采用天气预报形式，以事件发生的可能机率，运用预估模式”，对已发生过的事件所进行的时事访谈报道。都已经2019年了，他们还在预期展望我是否有可能早在2004年就已经继承过财产没有。
也就是没话找话，啰里啰唆，广东人说的“口水多过茶”，鲁迅作品里的那个祥林嫂了。
----Jan. 18th, 2019
01-17-2019 Anger featured in "Put the money on the table !" （“把钱放在桌上！” 所表达的愤怒）
Yesterday, I finally understand why the Chinese producing team has featured some stories about Chinese government supported yelling at everybody "put the money on the table".
First, for my blood associated, it means "Put the old man's stuff on the table" to feature my cousins' anger of not familiar with what is a Trust or its legal definition. I heard it has been explained all this time but some of my close cousins are still angry at me for
1) Why insist that my 2004's inheriting was Trust-Inheriting instead of Family Inheriting,
In 1950 or so, newly formed People's Republic of China's government sent a group of armed military personnel to forcefully shut down the Shanghai stock market. Other than with yells of "Put everything on the table and leave", it was reported that the entire process was tense and peaceful but left every investor empty hand with tears.
The misunderstanding was since China re-opened Shanghai Stock Market which enriched a lot of investors through IPO. A lot of Chinese, not just some rich Shanghainese, have started questioning what happened to all those investors money in the 1950's shut down? The question is not about the cash that those investors carry with them but what their stock certificates represented.
Each stock certificate represents an investor's ownership of a company. When those investors at the market left the trading room, they left behind their stock certificates, not the cash value that these stock certificates represented but the share of ownership of the company. Since that day, all market tradable stock certificates became invalid, all those market-traded companies became country-run companies by depositing business profits into the government-anointed bank accounts. The entire time, there was no cash value transacted, but those companies' ownership taken-over by groups of marched-in government employees.
The misunderstanding featured in the radio program was from the anger about who took the cash value of those handed-over stock certificates in 1950 and who has hidden these cash value at where since that day. Well, there is no such cash value at all, it was only companies' management change to deposit business making into bank accounts owned by the country instead of those owned by investors.
昨天，我总算弄清楚了为什么中国广播剧制作团队在中国政府的支持下，会对着所有的人叫唤”把钱放在桌上，让所有人看看清楚1”。
首先，这是在说“把老人留下的东西都放在台面上，让所有人看清楚” 所呈现的是那些和我有血缘关系的人因为不懂什么是信托及其法律条文定义而产生的愤怒。我听说已经是解释了又解释，和我血缘关系近的一些还是一腔的愤怒。
1）我为什么坚持是信托继承而不是在分家产？是否是在掠夺别人的继承权？
01-16-2019 Same high school producing team ---- today's and 2016's team （南师大附中制作组）
Heard this morning's broadcasting's lead editor was Chinese Propaganda Minister Wang，Yang's daughter or daughter-in-law (据说是汪洋的女儿或者媳妇做的主编剪辑), the entire producing team was associated with the high school I graduated from (南京师范大学附属中学). Participating producers include Fudan University's Business Professor Yan's son (复旦大学经济学院严教授的儿子)。 This Professor Yan is the person that, in a broadcasting a couple months ago, has demanded a "Lee's Family Trust" set up in 1941, to be transferred to him because his grandfather already took and kept the 10,000 Dayang that he was requested to send to this Trust in Hong Kong in 1945 by a rich lady in Shanghai. I heard the propaganda in China has been that I had publicly robbed Professor Yan's family wealth because I inherited this Trust in 2004 as the sole beneficiary great-granddaughter that was specified by the settler (my great-grandmother, the one who raised my father under her own roof, and also the one who was the next door neighbour to my grandparents' family). I heard this "Lee's Family Trust" was sized 60,000 Dayang in 1941.
I was harassed by local same high school "harassing team" so that I did not hear what was broadcasted this morning, but I heard the style is the same as 2016's Chinese producing team, which is using one different voice to read one differ scripted line to make-up a featured story that absolutely has nothing to do with the featured person in the story, but each scripted line is read by a person who is reading this person's own situation of the moment to fit this style in a "reality show eligible". This team's such producing efforts is the reason I accused Chines government intentionally blackmailed to threat and to demand money. （制作风格就是编纂剧本后，由演员一人读一句，而每人读的那一句台词也很符合该演员的“朗读时刻”时的真实生活实情，但整个编纂后由朗读而成的广播剧故事却与所讲述的该故事的主要人物没有任何一点关系。据说这是中国制作团队所能够理解的什么是“真实剧”。而我本人就一直因为这种编纂而成的“假真实”而自2016年起就一直指责中国政府是故意抹黑造谣以制造事件实施敲诈绑架勒索财物。据说国内的宣传基调自2016年起就和广播剧的2016年制作基调始终保持一致。）
I heard this producing team has the understanding this is lawful because this is how British Royals blackmailed my name through patched-up some so stuck-on so unwanted stories, obviously, Chinese Foreign Department has not informed them that British Royals and media have already revealed the real European female featured in those stories in 2017 to clarify the matter. （我听说制作团队认为这是国外的通行做法，英国王室就是这么编了一个故事痛骂我方敏是个没人要的烂货的呀。很明显，中国外交部还没有通知他们，英国王室及各国媒体早在2017年就已经在整个欧洲，美洲，大洋洲，亚洲，中东各地区揭示了那些故事中的一个真实的欧洲女性以澄清事件。）
----Jan. 16th, 2019
01-15-2019 Do I have Trust Inheriting? （我是否有继承信托？）
Heard this morning's saying about my intellectual incomes.
My answer: I can't wait to receive them.
I heard if safe for me to possess money in my own name has been the concern, I say now is much improved that I am no longer concerned if my mailbox or my apartment can be opened forcefully but so comfortably right in front of me or my neighbors. So, I am safe as my neighbors now, to receive checks or inquiry letters, and to have some cash in my apartment.
----Jan. 15th, 2019
Heard the Chinese community's anger is still if I have inherited money or financially independent.
My answer: I heard JD has announced Trust registration information can be verified for my most recent 5 generations' grandfathers'. I heard some Chinese angry that all are partial information that does not include current bank accounts information nor current investing activities.
Being the sole beneficiary person of all those Trusts, I state it is not necessary for anyone to know any current financial information of any of those Trusts, as long as it is verifiable that I am the sole beneficiary person and my Trust inheriting are both factual truths.
I heard the prints do not look professionally formal is the reason for the doubts if this is a piece of joky information. I say it is the original print0format from (possibly) a UNIX computer system which is authentic original print-out information. （听说中国政府机关有向美国司法部查询所公布的信托信息，但怀疑所提供的打印件是否不正式不正规而是在开玩笑。我估计那是电脑一种大机器系统的原始记录的打印格式就是这种样子的。这种电脑系统不是适合个人使用的视窗系统，但也是电脑系统，适合大规模资料贮存，多用于大机构大公司，是否如此应该可以通过中国国内的电脑系统核实的。）
I heard following are included in the information, together with me being the sole beneficiary person and in which year. These three generation grandfathers were the three-generation donators of Chinese colleges in the Republic China time.（ 台湾应该有方治兴，方励其和方智仁是三代祖父子关系的户籍登记资料，中国大陆有方智仁和我的祖父孙女关系的户籍登记记录，我继承的是他们为我所设立的信托）
My grandfather Fang, Zhiren (祖父方智仁，1965年去世） $15M美金 (exchange rate 1:$3)
My great-grandfather Fang, Liqi（曾祖父方励其(第七子），1930年去世）$11M美金 (exchange rate 1:$1)
My great-great-grandfather Fang, Zhixin （曾曾祖父方治兴，1907-1911年左右去世) $15M美金 (exchange rate 1:$1)
...
----Jan. 15th, 2019
01-14-2019 Who is doing the propaganda that I should be evicted from the U.S. if I dare to complain about public service?
What I have complained about public service? and Why?
I heard, to the government sector of the Boston city and Massachusetts state, "who is the wife to a Ford" is the critical decision factor to the matter if I could possibly have inherited Trusts from my own birth family, or if I am allowed to have my own making to be owned by myself. I heard it is the same critically important in government sector in China as well. Why???
I heard it has been very confusing who is the real authentic wife to a Ford, a Chinese Miss Zhu or an American (Miss) Juliet, but no matter how confusing it might be, why my own birth Chinese grandfathers' money I inherited or my own making should be whoever's to take in the United States or in the People's Republic of China? and why this taking over without authorization has been supported by some government employees? And why shouldn't I complain about public service from the government sector because of my such severely impacted unhappy experiences?
This morning, I was asking my own attorneys through the recording to my own smartphone about why I can't receive my $400Million yearly providing. I heard rumors that TS announced each $400Million for all five years has been clarified my lawful money verified and transmitted into 5 of my banking estate accounts which mean each bank account should use my name(pseudo or real) listed as owner of the account, I was never asked to provide my own banking information but I have the direct express card. And I heard there was another TS announcement a couple of months later that I (not specifically spelled, so, possibly me) may never get any of these $400Million per year but paid service-fee for each year can be returned or given to me, which means after losing each $400 Million a year, TS can return 400,000 per month service fee. I heard the service fee charged by TS is supposed to be 5% at least, and I heard there is some extra donation to TS that is matched and beyond the difference, well, I assume that is implied as won't be returned because that is a donation.
Some said as long as the money is from some foreign investors, the U.S. certainly can understand this is beneficial to the U.S. How? when I am a U.S. citizen? when the paying money is from these U.S. companies local business profiting? So, some U.S. money that is hard earned by some U.S. companies which should be given to a U.S. citizen has got lost in the U.S., even though it is according to some foreigners' instruction, why this can be understood as beneficial to the U.S.? How this logic can be understood?
I was asking my attorneys exactly what is going on and gets agitated because I just can't get expected money while it seems everyone in Boston including MA government sectors keep saying impatiently"You don't have any money because Rockefellers already said so loudly, you are not associated is loudly from Fords as well.", so, I heard this question "why don't you evict yourself from the United States if you don't like this government?" Am I the one being ridiculous?
I did complaint about Rockefellers regarding their possible involvement of inappropriateness. I heard R claimed this is hostility, I complained why they took my money and claimed I have no money as if I have ever lived on their money? As long as it can be certain I did not claim their money, even though Rockefellers may not know if I am lawful to claim I inherited money from my own birth Chinese grandfathers, my own making from radio program broadcasting should be easy to be understood as my own lawful making, right? R took every penny of my making from the radio program broadcasting.
I heard that saying it is understood that even though it has been all about my life experiences, but the radio program's success is all because of Rockefellers' name, or Fords' name. So, I have to ask why they can have this assumption about their own importance if none of them is a pathetic psycho? When everyone in the U.S. already heard the truth of their real romances, and when whoever in the entire world that heard of their names also heard so many rumors about their true romances already, Why would anyone only listen to the radio program because of their huge importance would waste their time to listen to those fake romance stories, even though it was only a couple of months for each of the two important names while the successful broadcasting was over 10 years?
The following has been my statement since June 30th of 2004. It is not hard at all for Rockefellers or Fords, or Waltons, to verify all these money is never owned by any of them, right? The same with Ford's association, it should \not be hard to verify that my inheriting is not associated with the truth if I have ever been associated with any Ford, right?
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth. My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
----Jan. 7th, 2019
----Jan. 14th, 2019
I heard this article pissed off everybody, well, I don't live on their money certainly means I speak up comfortably if they pissed me off.
----Jan. 14th, 2019
01-12-2019 Knit-top incident in UB in 1998 (硚口大学的不雅衣服事件）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting, it seems still very confusing. So, I just keep these statements here.
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth. My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
----Jan. 7th, 2019
Heard it is clarified “the same person" in the rumor is never her husband, never her romantic partner, etc., No contact with her since 1999, know nothing about her romance.
----Jan. 8th, 2019
Heard my casual dress incident in the University of Bridgeport on a 1998's Sunday has been a wildfire rumor in the Chinese community. Exactly, what was the story?
I was in a weekend computer science program in Springfield campus of the University of Bridgeport in the summer of 1998. As usual, I woke up at 7AM after an 11-hours weekday shift in a Chinese restaurant to catch the commuter train to school, well, it was summer, what I grabbed from my trunk was a normal knit-top that I put on without a Virginia Secret nor its equivalent underneath. I was not harassed at all on the train, in the classroom, and on my way home, but I did notice the insides could be seen if I stand straight during the lunch hour. This was rumored the famous indecent dress story in school.
I was lucky to be my carefree character to live in the United States that only police officers cared if it was appropriate even if I was completely without my entire knit-top, but I was not carefree about the dress code but carefree about what I can put on. I once joked that I possibly can be a pioneer for an exotic style dress as long as that is my taste of exotic but not the exposure.
I heard this incident has a wildfire sex-offender equivalent rumor since 2004, maybe because I was with class 4 at the time, which this entire confusion of "who is who and what is what" originated.
----Jan. 12th, 2019
有关硚口大学的”1998年的不雅衣服事件”，就是一件普通的针织短袖上衣，空心穿着，衣服有点小所以穿着有点紧绷了。当时我还是在硚口大学的四班上课，当时硚口大学春田分校的华人学生也大都是居住在纽约及新泽西州的，应该很了解我那天的衣着在美国，至少是美国的东部地区，根本也没什么了不起的，就是华人看着有点突兀而已，其它什么的，性疯狂啦，暴露狂啦，淫妇想勾引啦等等就一点都谈不上了。
听说89年学运是我在硚口大学上学时穿了一件”不雅衣服事件”的主要传播者（纽约新泽西确实有大批的89年学运），据说这届中国政府都是89年学运的同情者也是我被中国政府痛打的原因。我听说是因为我方敏老是用中华人民共和国的口气发表言论，让89年学运很气愤。
我方敏的回应：我从2004年起就一直强调我是方敏，我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，我所发表的言论都是以方敏名义发表，也从未回避我方敏就是唐太宗李世民的继承人，可方敏或者唐太宗这两个名字都不是中华人民共和国的名称标识啊？为什么说我以方敏名义所发表言论就是在以中华人民共和国名义表达立场？
有关”89年的时候也是如此“论点，我想请问89年学运:
1：请问你们是否认可当时的中共中央及中央军委对中国960万平方公里土地拥有合法领导权？
2：请问你们是否认可89年清理天安门广场的军事行动是由中共中央政府授权的合法管理行为？
3：请问你们是否认可我方敏作为在校学生，有法律权利及自由向当时的中共中央政府畅谈我对89年学运的想法？
4：30年后的2019年，请问你们是以什么样的阅历经历，认为当时的中国政府是管理过当而且这份过当是由我方敏造成的？请提出或理论或事实做为依据，而非只是一味空空洞洞的指责指控？
----2019年1月12日。
01-07-2019 Bridgeport University Graduated Chinese Mrs. Ford, whom? maiden name is Zhu Hongqing （真正的福特夫人其实是北京医学院药学系1990届的朱红箐？）
Big news:
To all University of Bridgeport's insider-alumni: This is no big secret anymore!!!!
（Heard it is clarified “the same person" in the rumor is never her husband, never her romantic partner, etc., No contact with her since 1999, know nothing about her romance. ----updated on Jan. 8th, 2019)
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.
My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
请告知所有知情的中华人民共和国中共中央政治局, 中国外交部，中共中央宣传部，中共中央军委，中国文化部：这已经不再是天大的秘密了。
请告知所有上海医科大学的知情校友：这已经不再是天大的秘密了。
（听说查过了，传说中的“同一个人”从来不是女方的丈夫或者女方的恋爱男朋友之类的。久未联络，真是完全不知女方的婚恋情况。----2019年1月8日）
(听说女方和南京的华姓是三等亲关系。很烦，女的自己弄不清谁是丈夫，什么钱是夫家钱，可是只要做丈夫的还没继承财产，也应该是由弄得清什么是自家钱，什么不是自家钱的公公婆婆处理啊，哪里需要做儿媳妇的满大街只要是钱就说是她自己夫家钱了。----2019年1月11日）
1: Heard a Chinese female from the same class in the same year that I graduated from University Bridgeport married "Charles Ford". The Chinese female is, rumored, a father-side fourth cousin to Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, and a father-side first cousin to the famous denounced descendent of Ming dynasty Emperor, a Mr. Zhu from Chinese Military. (Never a typo but a rumor with a long-time joke who has the correct family name)
2: Heard this is the Chinese female who lived near 82nd street in Queens in 1997 who graduated in 1990 from the Beijing Medical University's School of Pharmacy, her maid named is Zhu, Hongqing.（据说是北京医学院（北京协和医学院？）药学系90届的朱红罄(?). I graduated from Shanghai Medical University's Pharmacy School in 1990.
3: Rumored there was a special open to the public wedding reception(?) in 2011 in Shanghai, China, and it was rumored an open to public reception because both had no Shanghai local association at the time.
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.
My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
4: Rumored this "Charles Ford" is the person visited University Bridgeport's 2000 commencement and recognized by the same Chinese female at the moment.
01-06-2019 和南京方面的矛盾(8) --
《Two hundred years punishment 王博真夫妻及王家要求》
Heard this morning's broadcasting about 200 years' in-prison time.
I heard this is the law item applicable to anyone who seriously intends to own a company illegally.
Why I am not concerned? Because I am lawfully inherited some Trusts that have been investing in some companies is the reason that I am expecting to receive my living expenses that already paid-out by those companies as their investor, which means it is so clear that I never have any intention to own those companies illegally.
Those payments I have been expecting are all paid-out according to each of those companies lawfully registered investor's instruction, and all those instructing investors have not changed their investment share in each of those paying companies entire upstream investing chain for over accumulated 600 years is the reason that I claim I am never provided for by any rich male but Trusts set up by my own ancient birth grandfathers.
By the way, I was asked where this radio program has been broadcasting? I heard it has been tour-broadcasting, similar to what is commonly known for concerts but on radios.
----Jan. 6th, 2019
南京方面说我家一直是由王博真夫妻一家资助生活的，谁说的？
我的回应：王博真1990退休前江苏省人民医院的退休护士（不是护士长），她丈夫苏家隆是1956年左右就因病退休的中学老师，他们家是在1982年就领养了王淑秋作为他们自己的孩子。他们家的经济情况就可以凭中国的工资标准判定了。
我母亲高中毕业后做出纳，1980年代后才升为初级会计，1988年失去南京市汽车运输公司的正式工作，无退休金。我父亲是南京大学毕业的，1992-1993年退休前是中国科学院紫金山天文台的研究编辑人员，我是1990年大学毕业，1996年离开中国来美，我们家的经济情况也应该可以从中国的工资标准判定，请问我们家为何需要由王博真夫妻两个资助才能吃口饱饭？
我母亲确实是因为王博真才有了机会离开山东老家，但我母亲所有的兄弟姊妹当中，只有我母亲是必须做所有家务包括力所不能及的，才有可能留在南京而不被赶回山东老家，这是我母亲对于王淑秋确实是一个被领养的女儿待遇而一直耿耿于怀的原因。
所有的矛盾就在这里，是谁在坚持说我们家亏欠了王博真夫妻两个的抚养费用？我们家里谁需要他们出资抚养？我们家的气愤就是从没要求过，就送来好一大包的厕所草纸（省一点是一点)，还带着血迹的医院都已经不再使用的床单(垫在褥子下面总是可以暖和点），生了蛆的泡菜（好好煮煮还是可以省点菜钱的）。。。我们家是谢谢真心的好意不抱怨什么，怎么就成了我们家欠了他们的生活费了？给我的压岁钱，也就是我母亲的兄弟姊妹也给的出手，我大学毕业后一年会有两至三次每次几十元的零花钱，去了会有好吃的（也就是愿意拿出来招待我这个客人的），但怎么就成了我们家欠了他们一家生活费了？
在我母亲所有的兄弟姊妹当中，只有我们家被要求必须永远记得我母亲当年是如何离开山东老家的，我还必须不要自己的母亲王博贤而把王博真一家当自己亲娘，是谁这么花痴? 是谁认定了就只需坚决不准我有就会“抢了”王博真家的任何东西，王家人再齐心坚决痛骂我亲妈王博贤是个婊子，一齐栽赃说我是苏家隆下的种，就这么着，就可以让王博真成了亲娘待遇了？我方敏坚决拒绝。
还有，一口一声的，如果我方敏敢不按要求给钱，就让全世界都看着王家上下，齐声为王博真不能拥有亲娘待遇而痛哭而悲壮，看谁还会愿意做方敏的朋友？我方敏态度，我方敏立场就是，投诉这分明是在恐吓威胁以实施敲诈勒索。你们可以听听，王家上下，提的都是什么要求？表达的都是什么愤怒？都是为什么原因在悲壮着？
我听到的，就是我（婚姻）家，王家人必须想来就来，而且是如果我的婚床实在不能上去躺躺（不是肮脏的躺法），那我的卧室隔壁就必须放张床给他们；我（婚姻）家的东西，王家必须够资格捡好的拿。。我方敏态度，王博真自己很分得清谁是她自己的家里人，我方敏也分得很清楚，所以我方敏坚决拒绝这种过分的要求，我方敏坚决拒绝任何类似过分的要求。
不管王家及其所有亲朋如何诅咒我方敏断子绝孙，我方敏坚决拒绝领养王博真苏家隆的（领养）女儿王（苏）淑秋所育小孩，我方敏坚决拒绝领养王家及王家所有亲朋的任何小孩，我方敏坚决拒绝领养方家及方家所有亲朋的任何小孩。
我方敏拒绝领养任何非我方敏本人所亲生的子女*。
*听说，在美国，经代理孕母协助所生的亲生子女，也需要经过法律上的领养手续才可以建立父母子女法律关系。
----2019年1月6日。
01-04-2019 我的亲朋送礼计划 (14) ---- My online gifting idea --
《Commercial Registry & Ownership Confusion, Trust Registry& Sole Beneficiary》
I heard it is broadcasted "(The paid-out radio company's major featured person fee is) not your income" this morning, I heard it was not from the paying radio company but from a representative of a company that is set up by the person who deposited some portion of this money to own. I already asked laws help on why I have not received this paid-out-to-me money yet.
----Jan. 4th, 2019
I was asked what is the commercial registry, and what is the company(corporate) law?
My response:
An example: If you intend to open a coffee shop, the first permission you will seek is the commercial registry, and then the IRS' tax-id, and you need both commercial registration certificate and tax-id to apply for the health department's permission.
The commercial registration certificate is the government's record of this coffee shop's ownership, the commercial registry related laws are all about this coffee shop's ownership. The corporate (company) laws are about how to operate this coffee shop.
I think in the United States, because the land of North America was a colony to UK and France, etc. before its 1776's independence, so that commercial registries for all those companies operating on this North America soil before 1776 were in each of these countries' general consulate (convoy), but must have been re-registered in the United States commercial department(?) since 1776 when the U.S. established its own commercial registry laws. So, it is correct to say commercial registry laws has a history for over 400 years in North America.
I heard a lot of annoyances expressed against me keep saying I have inherited money, I don't consider speaking up my true inheriting experience inappropriate at all in the U.S., plus, with law enforcement's help, it can be verified if I am provided for by these paying companies even I haven't received anything yet, and please correct me in an email if your verification proves that inaccuracy in my blog articles is beyond informational purpose.
So, I am asking if these annoyances are because of those American companies' ownership confusion?I am a beneficiary person of some Trusts that have been investing these American companies through its at least 6 countries away upstream investor, so please direct your ownership-confusion to your concerning company directly, and I think lawful ownership commercial registry record can be verified from government's record as well. Thanks.
----Jan. 4th, 2019
Heard annoying rumors of promises to don't ever let me have my money.
My response: What these rumored promises mean in the U.S? First of all, this is a crime of discrimination against me.
Promise never to let laws prevail? What kind of rumor is this? This promise means the promising person's police badge would be taken off (badge-off) immediately in the U.S. In the young United States time, a police badge means sincere sworn to protect and to enforce, that those police officers stories have been all over cowboy-movies to praise how bravely they were to face challenges of loaded guns. Don't ever consider this kind of promises a joke to a law enforcing personnel or any government employee in the U.S.
----Jan. 4th, 2019
What is Trust Registry and Sole Beneficiary Person? 什么是信托登记和信托的唯一收益人
My answer: Trust Registry is the record of a Trust which records who is the settler, who is(are) this Trust's settler's specified beneficiary person(s), who is(are) this Trust's entrusting attorney(s), and how much money has been entrusted by this Trust's settler, etc. 信托登记是一个信托的登记记录，记录内容包括信托的设立人，信托设立人所指定的受益人，信托的受委托律师，以及所信托的财产有多少，等等。
If this Trust's settler has only specified one person to receive all of the entrusted money of this Trust, this one person is the sole beneficiary person of this Trust. 如果一个信托的设立人只指定了一个人接受所信托的所有财产，这一个人就被称为唯一受益人。
Please consult the attorney of your own if you are concerned about being a co-beneficiary person of any Trust I inherited. I heard the most recent 5 generation's grandfathers' Trusts have registry record verified that I am the sole beneficiary person of all five. And, I don't think anyone can be a beneficiary person specified in the same Trust with me when birthmark is how I was specified.如果你对你自己是否有可能也是我所继承的信托的受益人，请咨询你自己的律师。我听说最近代的五代爷爷给我的信托等级都已经核实过了，我确实是这五代爷爷所设立信托的唯一受益人。而且，我也不认为胎记掌纹是指定我是受益人的情况下，也不可能需要让我和其他人共一个信托（因为爷爷在当年就可以从一开始就可以把钱分开，就可以分别给，再分别信托给同一个律师或者不同律师就可以，也就是多写一张信托委托书而已）。
----Jan. 4th, 2019
01-03-2019 the U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus is not from my money
Heard this morning's broadcasting of U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus.
My response: I don't know yet why it is so confused to be associated with my money. I heard it is not some intellectual income nor any paid-out for my exclusive usage money. So, I know that is definitely not my money
I only have two sources of cash-money, intellectual incomes, and paid-out living expenses. My inherited Trusts are in-entrusting which means all payments are strictly followed what was decided on July 1st of 2004's entrusting teleconference, and not easy for myself as the sole beneficiary person to increase the decided amount of each's yearly payment. So, the U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus is nothing to do with me money.
Remember the pattern whoever's changed heart is so confusing if associated with me? Is this seems the same pattern about whoever's money now? Is this to arouse anger how dare TS employees to take whoever's lawful money? Or to confuse the public if I possibly have any lawful money? Is this the same expectation as all those confused romances broadcasting?
Also, I heard about rumored IRS internal broadcasting of the statement "known reason for income-depositing substitution & unchangeable permanently" without any further explanations. So, I asked this question to the laws: why being the person most impacted by this intellectual-income depositing substitution, I am not part of the informed group even after I filed complaints about this substituting my name titled on the check when depositing? Why the lawful ownership of some money can be so confusing in the media industry?
----Jan. 3rd, 2019
I heard the saying how I speak up on the Boston radio can actually get myself some money and change the ownership of an American company that has been historically owned by O'Connors?
I have explained this already that no lawful-ownership has ever changed no matter how long O'Connor have been confused, or how loudly I spoke my side stories. The confused company still owned by its historically lawfully registered owner which is that American company's British investor-company for over 400 years.
I heard: O'Connors have been confused because of their family's over 50 years hard savings. Their two generation stubborn grandfathers insisted on to invest in this not-for-sell American company by refusing to take salary payments or by refusing to sign the salary-receipts of each's 6-months-salaries per year for over 50 years. These two generations of O'Connors' families lived on thrift half-salary for over 50 years has been the reason for their confusion and all their anger in their yearly meeting with the American company. The arguments have been "We are the investors" from O'Connors replied with "This is the company never for sale" from the American company; and "Why you took the money" from the O'Connors replied with "Because you refused to sign the salary receipts" from the American company. I heard all these 50 years salaries had been saved in the bank, and all the savings had given to the O'Connor family with the first installment of their agreed upon providing from the American company.
I was confused because everybody says O'Connor families own the 100% of the American company I thought I inherited in 2004, my anxiety was where would be my inherited share if so? It turned out what I inherited is a Trust that has been investing for centuries in this American company through its upstream investors. The company I confused is this American company's American investor-company. My expected money is the yearly providing from the Trust I inherited in 2004 as its sole beneficiary person. I have not received the expected money because of all these confusion.
Why the government didn't stop both parties real owning efforts on the media? I assume because nobody knew which American company I was confused but my inheriting experience in 2004 is real, or this assumption is applicable to both parties? Both parties stopped arguing after this American company's British investor-company explained about this American company's investing history and about my expected paid-out-already is upon its upstream investor's instruction.
The media can certainly verify the commercial registry record of this American company's ownership which should have not been changed by all these confusion.
----Jan. 3rd, 2019
I was asked why I haven't say Merry Christmas or Happy New Year to my biological children? Currently, I am eligible to choose to protect their privacy over my needed public explanation. Currently, in their associated matters, it is very clear that they do have a resourceful mother who can protect them no matter how confusing it can be about if they have a father care about them at all.
----Jan. 3rd, 2019
01-02-2019 About my lawful investor income tax rate
I heard my yesterday's blog aroused a lot of curiosity if the validation is needed. My understanding was if that was because the commercial registry law has been around for about 400 years in history (600 years in my previous blog article is the years has been in the same dynasty), but my grandfather's Trust, that I am the sole beneficiary person of, was set up 800-1300 years ago. I heard it is concluded that "the validation for that 600-800 years' investor-ownership is not necessary", because my ancient family portraits and other hard factual evidence already made up that 600-800 years historical gap. So, I heard it is announced this morning that, it is concluded that all five years'(2015-2019) all providing-payments are lawful payments qualified for investor income tax rate.
I heard this lawful investor-ownership was announced with a "so-annoying" tone, I understand it is from the annoyingness that I was never the person who contributed to any of these companies great history. I respect this is a true statement and I respect all those contributions. I am willing to contribute to the futures of these companies and I already have started such efforts since 2004.
----January 2nd, 2019
I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
USJD and my entrusting attorneys, who is better?
My answer: I am a U.S. citizen and I am the sole beneficiary person.
Please check my other related articles from
My Online Gifting Ideas (我的亲朋送礼计划系列 )
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
----January 2nd, 2019
Regarding the anger why it has to be my money. 为什么这钱就只能归你所有的愤怒？
My answer: I understand this can be angry when someone is in the situation that in need of some money or wish to live in a better life, and I understand anger may out of the conceptual understanding that money represents problems-solved or a better life to all those people who share this anger. My own anger has been why it has to be my lawful money? So, let me materialize this anger to illustrate if this anger is about "someone's lawful money but not necessarily specifically my lawful money"我能理解当某人需要钱或者想过一份好的生活时，会有一些钱能解决问题及有钱就能过好日子的理解，并由此而产生一些愤怒，我的愤怒就是为什么想要钱就应该还必须拿我方敏合法的财产及收入？我来展示一下你们是否“只想要别人的合法的钱财但不一定是我的合法钱财”。
Illustration 1:
If you are in a grocery store, you saw an obviously fat wallet displayed casually in your next person's shopping cart, and if you were emotional with this anger "Why it has to be your money?", what will you do? 如果你是正在超市买东西，看到旁边一个人的推车上放着一个鼓鼓的钱包，如果你当时又正好在为“为什么就是应该是你自己的钱”这个道理而生气，那你看到了这个鼓鼓的钱包你会怎么做？
Illustration 2:
If you bypass a wonderful house and saw a beautiful couple with their happy children, and if you were emotional with this anger "Why it has to be owned by you?", what will you do about that house, that couple and those children?如果你经过一个高档住宅，看到一对漂亮夫妻和他们的快乐孩子，如果你当时又正好在为“为什么好的就是应该你自己的”这个道理而生气，那你准备对这房子，夫妻及孩子采取什么行动？
----Jan. 2nd, 2019
Regarding rumors that one of Painter's non-heir son also had set up a Trust, I don't know it that has been next-kin-inherited by the Painter's heir-son (my next generation grandfather) and distributed already, or otherwise. I myself have not heard if that heir-son grandfather of mine also has a Trust for me, so, I have not heard anything regarding that non-heir son's rumor.
有关800年前的国画大师张国焘有一个非继承人儿子可能也有一个信托的传言。我本人不清楚是否应该已在当时被他的继承人兄弟即我的下一代的爷爷按照亲属继承法所继承，并已经由该下一代爷爷的所有孩子所拥有，还是另有说法等等。我本人也还没有听说该下一代爷爷是否也有信托给我等等，所以我目前没听说任何相关信息。
----Jan. 2nd, 2019
01-01-2019 At least it is certainly won't be the fifth year, Happy New Year to the Federal
Heard this morning's broadcasting that NJ took 300Million, and MA announced a couple of months ago that any money paid to Boston stay in MA which possibly including my this year's Christmas store gift cards (heard it right before this Christmas).
All from the third year's living expenses paying company. The reason? It is the Federal's "lousy" job granted this opportunity. If you have read my blog yesterday, you know this is certainly won't be the story for the fifth year's paying company. The validation is beautifully done, it is not the Federal's lousy validation issue if whoever read validation-certificate incompletely.
What this meaning to me? I have to be a little more patient till all sorted out. The fourth year is the Father's company which may also possibly validation-safe, which means I may be able to get the fourth and the fifth year's providing soon. Others may need to wait some more time, but no concern if the money can be declared lawfully mine or if I can still have that third year's $400Million back. (Assumed Federal's lousy validation job of a private company's payment check is the reason of this experience, not certain if it was the Federal Reserve in this morning's arguing voice to NJ: "You can't do this" and Federal's determination "nobody can touch any money till confusion cleared".)
It is not good for me because those payments to MA are mostly from the third year's paying company (10,000 per month story company), that is all currently. I heard tighten the validation itself or the validation-certification may need several more weeks, but I don't know how lengthy argument it can be between the Federal Reserve and these states.
I truly appreciate the Federal's great job on validating so beautifully done, so I say "At least it is certainly won't be the fifth year's, Happy New Year to the Federal."
I say "For the fifth year's $400Million validation, it is absolutely your problem if you do not read the entire validation-certification page word by word, from the page's most-top to the page's most-bottom."
Why I am this relaxed to the Federal's "lousy" validation job? Because I know the proud of making a rough prototype works so imperfectly wonderful.
---- Jan. 1st, 2019
12-31-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (12) ---- My online gifting idea --
《Validation confusion “How you got this conclusion?”》
I heard this morning's broadcasting of some confusion regarding my $400Million yearly providing. I heard the confusion is from banks that have received this $400Million living expenses payment check titled with Min Fang's name from USTS together with a "lawfully Min Fang's money" validation letter from USJD office. I heard the confusion is because of some shared personal frustration in USTS and in Banks: "how the USJD office can have this 'lawfully Min Fang's money' conclusion with its own statements to explain the obvious otherwise"?
I heard the reading-tips are, for this shared personal frustration in reading this validation letter, :
I add my own explanations:
If any booked service providers of mine share the same frustration, please contact your own legal department on how to validate this information.
----Dec. 31st, 2018
《验证疑云：“你怎么得出这结论的？”》
我听说了今天早上的播出提到我每年的生活费用给付究竟是什么钱的困扰。我听说困扰是一些银行，就是那些收到了USTA的4亿美金“方敏”抬头的支票及附加的USJD的验证了“是方敏的合法钱财”信件的银行。我听说了USTS和银行业很多人共同的困扰就是“USJD明明说了一通为何否定的解释，怎么又结论说确实就是方敏的合法钱财？”
我听说对于这封让很多人纠结不已的USJD办公室的验证信的阅读指南如下：
我还听说2015-2019年期间的我的每年4亿美金的生活费用给付合法及我本人适用投资人的收入税都已经验证合法，并且验证过程法理逻辑非常严密。
我再加上我自己的解释：
12-30-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (11) ----
《什么是信托，信托和所投资企业的关系》
什么是信托，可以用一个很多人都有的体验来解释：房屋产权
什么是“当时就给了”
如果你家老人付钱买了一套房子，找律师协助登记在你名下，等你长大后使用 --》“房子当时就给了”
家里老人提领了银行存款，找律师协助信托在你的名下，等你长大后领取--》“钱当时就给了。”
在李姓律师的协助下，我爷爷1948年就把5百万大洋信托的“女掌”名下，等“女掌”出生后领取，所以，“钱当时就给了女掌。”
什么是”记录更改无效”
你一旦买房子，就会有付款买房的记录，你必须凭此记录才可以去房屋管理局将所买房子登记在你自己名下。如果房屋管理局的工作人员在没有任何过户记录的情况下，就擅自将该房屋产权更新登记在别人名下，就叫做”记录更改无效”。
我爷爷办理信托，就会有付款给李姓律师办理该信托的记录。我听说的：李姓律师已凭此记录在香港信托登记处登记了该信托。1964-1965年，或者是1967年，在没有任何由我爷爷方智仁所授权的证据的情况下，有香港信托登记处的工作人员未经授权就擅自将该信托更新登记在某于姓人士名下，所以该更新记录在当时就已经被香港的信托登记处注明为”记录更改无效”。但这却造成了上海的于姓人士为香港的李家信托的法定所有权而困扰不已多年。
什么是“信托和信托所投资企业的关系”：
如果你爷爷是付钱买房的人，你爷爷找律师协助将房屋产权登记在你名下，你就是房屋产权的登记屋主。买房子需要做房屋质量验证，确保房屋价格没有诈欺，房屋管理局也有该房屋质量验证记录保存，如果你想卖房子，或对房屋质量有怀疑，可以查验此纪录。但如果你弟弟对你爷爷是否把房子给了你一个人有怀疑，你弟弟就只需要查验屋主登记的政府记录，而不需查验房屋质量验证的记录。
我爷爷找律师协助，付款给律师把5百万大洋信托在我名下，等我长大后提取。律师在信托登记处将该5百万大洋的信托注册登记了，同时也将该5百万大洋投资的资料也同时提交了（也就是提供了用该5百万大洋设立了一个李家信托公司进行投资的资料）。我爷爷其他子女如对我是否是该5百万大洋信托的唯一受益人有怀疑，就只需查验我是否是该信托的唯一受益人，但无需查验当初的5百万大洋是如何投资的具体信息，也就是说，只要他们不是该信托的受益人，就根本就不需要查验1948年的5百万大洋究竟投资到哪里去了的资料，也不需要查验5百万大洋所投资的李家信托这家公司的具体投资经营情况。
和中国政府就我继承财产的矛盾
就像屋主可以住在房子里，房客缴纳房租可以住在房子里，但如既不是屋主或屋主的客人，又非房客或房客的客人，哪里有可能就是一定要住在这个屋子里？信托所投资企业的工作人员可以在公司里拿工资，信托受益人作为企业的投资人可以提领到利润分红，但你们既不是企业的工作人员，又不是信托的受益人，你们凭什么就是一定要我的信托所投资的企业付钱给你们？
我对中国政府在美国及欧洲到处和企业联络，要求企业按方家其他人要求支付钱财的矛盾就在此。他们根本就不是信托的受益人，凭什么跑到企业要求企业给钱，企业没有钱给的：在企业交纳公司税之前，企业就只有企业公款没有任何私人钱财，在缴纳公司税之后，就只有投资人投资机构的利润分红的钱了，而他们既然不是信托的受益人就不是信托所投资企业的投资人，信托所投资的企业究竟能有什么钱必须给他们？就像房屋质量验证人员哪里会知道是谁才是买房子的那一个，信托所投资的企业那里会清楚谁才应该是该信托的受益人？
如果经过核查，确定某信托确实是我爷爷给我一个人的钱，为什么因为其他人也想要钱我就必须给钱？为什么只要他们是方家血缘后人，就可以由中国政府协助进行公然抢劫？如果我的信托所投资的企业的钱都已经到了不给就自己上门动手强拿的地步，这还不是公然抢劫啊？
还有，在国内国外，银行的企业存款私人存款都是有法律上的合法的存款户名的，银行职员哪里有可能可以自由地将私人存款公司存款的类别，随意更改为捐款类别就把银行存款的合法存款户名通过“认为应该是捐款吧”就给换成另一个存款户名了？这在美国全部都是洗钱刑事犯罪。这在中国是不是也是洗钱刑事犯罪？
----2018年12月30日。
12-29-2018 李家信托1967年的信托登记更改，在法律上无效的。
听说了今天早上播出的中共中央政治局常委韩正的妻子代表上海的于家人士和方家人士表达对于1948年所设立的香港李家信托的困扰。
疑问：香港的一个李家信托是在1948年由方智仁所设立，该信托登记已在1967年被更改，为何该信托还是归我所有？Question: The Li's family Trust was set up in 1948, but its registry was changed in 1967, why it is still my Trust?
回答：我所听说的，香港的一家李家信托是1948年由方智仁注资五百万大洋所设立，并由方智仁指定其长子方文海所出的女掌为唯一受益人（附有掌纹图）。作为该信托所指定的唯一受益人，我是1967年7月才出生，而该信托的设立人我爷爷方智仁是在1965年就已经去世。方智仁是中华人民共和国户籍本上所登记的我父亲方文海的父亲。我已经听说了该信托登记是在1967年被一位当时已是香港居民的于姓人士或其私人朋友所更改，这个更改登记的记录应该可以查核。按照英国法律，美国法律及中华人民共和国法律，李家信托1967年的登记更改，在法律上都是无效更改。所以该信托还是归我所有，我是在2004年继承该信托。（请看下面的举例解释说明。）I heard one of the several Li's Family Trust was set up by Fang, Zhiren in 1948 with 5Million Chinese Dayang, who specified the sole beneficiary should be the palm girl from his eldest son's palm line, attached with the illustration of the family palm birthmark. I, the sole beneficiary person, was born in 1967, while the Settler, Fang, Zhiren died in 1965. Fang, Zhiren was the recorded the birth & legal father to my birth & legal father Fang, Wenhai in People's Republic of China's city registry. I have heard the Trust registry was edited in 1967 by a Hong Kong resident Mr. Yu or his personal friend which certainly can be verified. According to the British Laws, the United States laws, and the People's Republic of China laws, such registry change was illegal & invalid. I inherited this Li's family Trust in 2004. (Please check the illustration explanation for illegal & invalid below.)
1948年信托设立时的香港受委托李姓律师，我听说前两天的播出已经说明在1950年代已经全家移民英国生活，我只是该信托的唯一受益人，所以我不是太清楚前几天播出的在香港长大的李家信托登记上的三个李姓共同律师是怎么回事。我记得几个月以前播出的某集内容里，英国司法机构对于1941-1949年期间在香港设立的七个李家信托也做过了专门解释。我记得播出的说明是其中两个是同一个受益人（我是我爷爷（1948）和我曾祖母（1941）两个李家信托的唯一受益人），还有四个李家信托多年前就已经无效也就是已经不存在了。I heard 1948's entrusting attorney has migrated to Britain in 1950 with his entire family. Being the sole beneficiary person, I don't know who the three Hong Kong grown-up co-entrusting Li's last named attorneys are, but I remembered several months ago, the British Justice Department has explained 7 Li's Family Trusts that were set up between 1941-1947. I remembered it said two of them share the same sole beneficiary person, four of them already dissolved over the years.
香港的1947年由上海的于先生注资一万大洋（？）所设立的一个于家信托，我不是太清楚，不过我有听说其当年设立后所投资的公司现在的（2018年）总规模是50万美金左右。与我所继承的李两个家信托所投资的公司都不是一家公司。我也不知该信托当年的受委托李姓律师是不是这三个香港长大的李姓律师的父亲? Regarding another Trust that was set up by a Mr. Yu in 1947 with 10,000 Chinese Dayang, I don't know much but I heard the company it invested since 1947 has its current size of $500,000 US dollar or so. It is totally a different company from the companies that my Trusts have been investing. And I don't know if that Trust's 1947 entrusting attorney Mr. Li was the father of that three HongKong grown-up co-entrusting attorneys.
我相信这些困扰都是可以通过英国或者香港的司法机关核实解答的。I think all these confusions can be resolved if check with UK's Justice Department and Hong Kong local Justice Department.
作为唯一受益人，我本人应该是由香港李家信托的现任律师出面联络，或由我本人联系美国警方协助联络香港李家信托的现任律师。我不太清楚香港李家信托的现任律师是谁，但我已经就香港的李家信托2004年按我要求所汇出的5亿美金投资款的如今下落联络了美国警方。Being the sole beneficiary person, I should be contacted by this Li's Family Trust's current entrusting attorney, or I should contact U.S. Justice Department ask for help to get in touch with the Trust's current attorney. I don't know who is the current attorney but I have contacted U.S. Justice Department regarding a $500Million U.S. dollar that was sent out to invest in the U.S. by this Trust as I requested in 2004.
----2018年12月28日。
国内国外对方敏是否继承财产事件的矛盾就在于，以李家信托的困扰为例子，中国政府似乎完全无视所有这些法律上对于该信托的法律所有权所作出的解释，其实都和中华人民共和国自己的信托及继承相关法律完全不抵触，也完全不矛盾，但中国政府似乎是根本无视李家信托1967年时期的信托登记更改，其实是一些人所实施的非法篡改法律记录以达到偷窃钱财的努力，而对于相关的于家一些人士对此所产生的困扰似乎就没有任何法律上的解释疏导，而是似乎是在企图利用中国的国家宣传机器强行通过宣布拥有而企图实质改变李家信托的法律财产拥有权。The problem that caused huge anger has been: I use today's confusion regarding Li's Family Trust as an example, the Chinese government seems completely ignore that all these explanations regarding this Trust's lawful ownership do not conflict nor violate China's own laws about Trust and its inheriting. But the Chinese government seems completely ignore the 1967's Registry change was a criminal attempt to illegally own the Trust by illegal change government Trust-registry record, and never provide legal help to those confused Yu's families but tried to use its government propaganda machine to forcefully and effectively change this Trust's lawful ownership.
举例解释：房屋产权登记的记录，如果不经过该物业的付款购屋业主的同意或者授权，而是通过在政府的房屋管理所任职的工作之便或私人朋友的工作之便，擅自更改该物业的法律所有权的法律登记记录，是否是企图非法拥有该物业的财产所有权？Illustration of this: Property Registry record. If such government property registry record was changed without any authorization from the lawful property owner nor the effort to inform the lawful property owner, but changed by a government employee's job-convenience, is this effort is attempted to illegally own this property?
包括对于美国当地一些公司法律拥有权的困扰，中国政府的努力似乎也是类似，通过国家宣传机器，完全无视当地的财产所有权是由当地法律所决定的，造成到处都是乱像，明明是法律所有权非常明确的公司财产私人财产，却被宣传成是没人要的钱而谁都可以随便拿。It is the same regarding the confusion about local American company's lawful ownership. The Chinese government seems completely ignore local wealth's lawful ownership is decided by local laws but seemed attempted to use its propaganda machines to impress the public that all these clearly lawfully owned local private wealth, company's assets or personal wealth, to be understood as no-owner money that should be so free to be announced-to-own by whoever, which has caused so criminalized-legal situations.
----2018年12月28日。
12-28-2018 Why I chose my father over my brother? (我为什么选择了父亲而不是弟弟？）
I was asked, why I chose my birth and legal father over my same parent's younger brother?
My answer: Because I am certain that it is my father who raised me, not my younger brother. This seems to be very hard for some same parents elder sister to understand. I say I can only be frank enough to explain myself.
我虽是我父亲的亲生女儿，可我也是一个同父同母的姐姐，为何选择了父亲？这让一些国内做姐姐的就是难以明白我的选择。
我的回应：我很清楚，是我的父亲为我含辛茹苦，是我的父亲关爱我的衣食冷暖，从来不是我同父同母的弟弟。我能帮助国内一些做姐姐的明白我的观点的方式就是美国人坦诚直率的方式：
12-27-2018 方敏对今天早上以中共中央政治局全体扩大会议名义所表达立场的回应
听说了今天早上以中国政府名义所表达立场。
我的回应：我和中国政府的矛盾从来不是中国国家领导人的私生子及私人恋爱婚姻生活。
我方敏从不认为中共中央政治局全体扩大会议的全体成员都是花痴精神病变态人员，会认为我只在1991年有过一次饭局及一通电话的与中国国家总理李克强全部交往关系情况下，在中共中央政治局全体扩大会议非常确定自1991年以后，我方敏从未联络该花痴精神病变态人士或要求联络该花痴精神病变态人士以建立浪漫关系的情况下，在其间只有2015年一次传真信件至中国纽约领事馆，而该信件就是我寄往美国政府相关机构的同一份信件的情况下，在中共中央政治局全体扩大会议非常确定这一切都是事实的情况下，会需要在27年后的2018年由中共中央政治局扩大会议的全体女性成员及全部男性委员妻子为其婚姻自由选择的合法妻子必须被公开承认而矢志奋斗以表达中国政府对我方敏的性骚扰永不停息的坚定意志。
我方敏本人很清楚今天早上以中国政府名义所表达立场与中国政府在中国国内的宣传基调是一致的。我方敏本人对中华人民共和国的贡献一切真实，问心无愧。我方敏本人仍在观望，究竟中华人民共和国是否还是中国共产党领导下的宪法有效，以事实为依据实事求是为人民服务的法治国家。
----2018年12月27日。
12-26-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (9) ---- My online gifting idea
《 My Royal Titles and validation of the lawful ownership》
Heard this morning's broadcasting mentioned the beauty of the validation for my investor tax rate. With everybody seems trying to rewrite the original beauty of this water-proof judicial literature, I can't hear what was announced, but tons of lousy arguments. Basically, I heard this morning detailed out why I am proved the sole beneficiary qualified for investor tax, and no one else is eligible even though I have close kins and Trust registries are private.
There are two arguments, one is who is the better one? my entrusting attorneys, or the U.S. Justice Department?
My answer: I am a U.S. citizen and the beneficiary person.
----Dec. 26th, 2018
The other argument, is this a scheme? How an investor-ownership can be validated by just writing a piece of judicial literature?
My answer: It is validated with supporting evidence which includes 6+1 countries' Justice Department's testimonies that none of American paying company's upstream investor-companies in each's country has been deprived because of the payment, as well as no complaint has ever received if any of the American paying company's upstream investors being deprived because of the payment. And more, of course.
----Dec. 26th, 2018
One more related question, how this validated I am Simba's Royal Heir?
My answer: I heard my last year's living expense providing paying company's ancient upstream investor company has been historically known set up by the person who was featured in the <Lion King> animation movie as Simba. I was provided for this paying company because I am its specified lawful sole beneficiary person. This year's payment is from the historically known Simba's son's money, I am also its specified lawful sole beneficiary person. Each also entitled its sole beneficiary person, which is me, with an Emperor equivalent entitlement.
So, I am the Ingonyama officially validated now. I am the Missy Ingonyama.
----Dec. 26th, 2018
我的皇室封号及法律拥有权的核实
听说了今天早上提到让我符合投资人税率的资格证实法律程序做的有多漂亮。太多人都在尝试用自己的语言重述今天早上所宣布的，所以我就没听见都宣布了些什么，就只听到一堆的逻辑不严谨。基本上，也就是宣布了在信托登记不公开的情况下, 为何我符合投资人税率，而且是就算我有很多亲戚血缘关系，但就只有我一个人符合该投资人税率资格。
我听到有两个于此相关的争议，一个争议是谁才是法律法学上更厉害的一个？我的信托律师，还是美国司法部？
我的回答：我是美国公民，我是受益人。
----2018年12月26日。
另一个争议就是，这是不是伎俩？那有可能企业投资人的拥有资格可以写一纸法律文献就可以证实了？
我的回答：核实是验证了大量的证据的，这些证据包括6+1个国家司法部门证实该美国付款公司在各自国家里的投资母公司的资产没有因该付款而造成该国相关投资公司的资产被掠夺，以及从来没有接到过该美国付款公司的任何一个投资母公司因该付款而造成投资人资产被掠夺的投诉。当然还有更多证据。
----2018年12月26日。
还有一个相关的疑问，这如何证实了我是《狮子王》动画片里的Simba的皇位继承人?
我的回答：我听说《狮子王》动画片里的Simba的原型，就是支付我去年的生活费用给付的那家美国公司的一个很古老上游投资公司的设立人，历史上就一直很著名的，支付我生活费用的原因是我是其指定的法律上唯一的收益人；支付我今年生活费用的美国公司的一个很古老上游投资公司的设立人，历史上就一直知道是这个Simba原型的儿子。我也是其唯一受益人。各自又都有授予其指定的唯一受益人（也就是我）一个等同皇帝地位的封号。
所以，我的狮子王Ingonyama封号已经正式经过核实了。我是一个小姐，所以，我是狮子王小姐。
----2018年12月26日。
12-25-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (8) ---- Merry Christmas?
Heard this Christmas Day morning's frustration from those blood associated.
My anger has been
1) Why they have demanded to me as if I owe their kindness or financial debts, knowing I never heard of them before all these harassments is a True statement.
2) Why they have demanded with such anger as if their lines never got their shares in the family inheriting at that shared grandfather's death?
3) Why I have money according to my birth grandfathers' wills is the reason that I am "not allowed to own"? Why those I am willing to gift are "not allowed to receive"?
4) Why those who care so much about anyone who is in-need keep demanding me for money and don't allow my own beloved to have better financial arrangement from my money, not to mention to own a house or better clothing, why themselves refuse to sell their own house to show their own care to whoever they are willing to support demanding me for money? All my beloved have to be abused to only allowed to live on welfare in order to support all these demanding for money in-need, why is this?
5) Why my own beloved ones do not deserve to have a Merry Christmas gifted by my own money? Why I myself don't deserve a Merry Christmas party of my own that is financed by my own money?
I refuse to gift to any of those frustration expressed on this Christmas Day. All those who truly care persons can certainly sell their own house to give out their so special gifts to whoever they care. I am only allowed to be abused and to live on welfare is the reason for my this refusal and a lot of my emails to the law enforcement.
----Dec. 25th, 2018
12-24-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (6) ---- Why I eligible for investor income tax rate?
There are more ripples about my gifting related ---- Whose money I intend to gift lawfully?我准备用谁的钱送礼？（中文附后）
1: Is it possible there are 5 persons who want to give me money provided for me $4Million each year for the past 5 years?
My answer: I heard two of the five years' paying American investment are historically known for from the father and heir son. I heard it has been validated that my fourth year (2018) was provided by Simba, my this year's (2019) is by his son, as both of their specified sole beneficiary person upon instruction. I am Ingonyama Mufasa's heir-child is now officially validated. I am the Ingonyama, I am the Missy Ingonyama Fang. I enjoy being the Missy Fang always, even I may not use my maiden name on my credit cards. Merry Christmas to myself.
I heard U.S. Justice Department's validation used Simba's official name (Li, Ang; 唐文宗李昂), his father Ingonyama Mufasa is Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Mu（Li, Heng; 唐穆宗李恒), his son was Li, Chan (唐武宗李瀍).
References：
List of Chinese monarchs
Emperor Wuzong of Tang
中国君主列表
唐武宗 （维基百科）
----Dec. 24, 2018
2: Why I eligible for the investor tax rate? because there are at least two of those providing paying investments are from the same family, and I am provided upon each's investor's instruction as each's clearly and legally validly specified sole beneficiary person "Female Palm(女掌)" because of the family birthmark I have on my both palms. So, I am eligible for the investor tax rate.
----Dec. 24, 2018
3: Another Two Trusts are from the mother and her son: Hong Kong's two "Li's (Lee's) Family Trust".
One was set up in 1941 by my great-grandmother with 60,000 Chinese Dayang, one was set up in 1948 by my grandfather with 5Million Chinese Dayang, both called Li's(Lee's) Family Trust. Both settlers are recorded in the People's Republic of China's city registry as my birth great-grandmother and grandfather, I am the sole beneficiary person of each Trust.
I heard the Trust my great-grandmother set up for me has intended to send $100,000 to help out, if so, I say I am willing to let this $100,000 U.S. dollar send to my birth and legal father Fang, Wenhai（方文海) upon law enforcement's validation if he is alive, and on the requirement that my birth and legal father has to use it all on himself, I say so as the sole beneficiary person "Female Palm（女掌）" of the Trust that set up in 1941 by my great-grandmother. My great-grandmother was the one who raised my father in her own household, which had been a next-door neighbor to my grandparents' own household.
----Dec. 24, 2018
4： Why so many people saying I can't have my own money?
My answer: I heard one scheme is the "swap game", which has been targeting me. But all of my inherited wealth has been all under entrusting so that it is impossible to be misunderstood if I participated. And, all of my intellectual incomes are also impossible to be misunderstood can be swapped without me even heard of it.
----Dec. 24, 2018
中文大意
1：有没有可能是有这么5个人愿意给我钱花，所以每人给了我这每年的4亿美金？我听说五年中的两年是由历史上就很知名的是父亲和继承人儿子各自的两个投资基金所支付的。我听说已经证实的就是我2018年的付款美国基金的投资人就是狮子王里的Simba的，2019年的付款基金的投资人就是Simba的继承人儿子的，付款是依据投资人的指示，因我是这两个信托各自的唯一受益人而给付。我是狮子王穆法萨的继承人孩子已经被证实了，我是狮子王，我是狮子王方家大小姐。我喜欢自己永远被称为方家大小姐，虽然我的信用卡可能不会用这个娘家姓。这真是给了我自己好大一个圣诞快乐。
我听说是美国司法部核实的，用的Simba的原名李昂（唐文宗李昂）进行核实的，狮子王穆法萨是唐穆宗李恒，Simba的儿子就是唐武宗李瀍(Li, Chan).：
索引：
List of Chinese monarchs
Emperor Wuzong of Tang
中国君主列表
唐武宗 （维基百科）
----2018年12月24日。
2：我为什么符合投资人税率？因为这五年当中有两年是按照同一家庭的父与子所分别设立的基金的指示所支付的，因为我双手手掌上的家族胎记掌纹及父系血脉，我是这两个基金各自所明确且合法指定的唯一受益人"女掌”，所以，我符合投资人税率。
----2018年12月24日。
3：香港的两个信托是母子各自设立的：香港的两个李家信托。
这两个信托，一个是1941年由我曾祖母以6万大洋所设立的，一个是我爷爷1948年以5百万大洋所设立的，两个都叫做李家信托，这两个信托的设立人是中华人民共和国的有效户籍登记上的我爷爷和我曾祖母。我是这两个信托各自的唯一受益人。
我听说我曾祖母的那个信托想电汇10万美金现金帮帮忙，如果如此，如果警方可以证实我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海是否还活着以后，我愿意将这10万美金电汇给我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海，条件是我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海必须将这钱全部花在我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海自己身上，我是以这个1941年由我曾祖母所设立信托的唯一受益人“女掌”身份这么说的。我的曾祖母是在她自己家里一手将我父亲带大的一个，他们祖孙两个一直都是我爷爷奶奶一墙之隔的隔壁邻居。
----2018年12月24日。
4: 为什么这么多人说我不可以有我自己的钱？
我的回答：我听说有一个“置换游戏”伎俩可能一直以我为靶标。但我所继承的所有财产全部都在信托当中，所以不可能误解我是否有参与过置换。我的智慧产权收入也是不可能误解我是否参与过置换。
12-21-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (6) ---- My online gifting idea
1: About my online gifting idea: What information needed to validate a friend from an occasion? Please specify the date, time, and the characteristic behavior. What will be the no-question asked gifting size once validated? $500 U.S. dollar. （有关网上送礼的：如何确定一个一面之交的朋友？请提供时间和日期，以及可协助确定的举止行为。一旦确定，如果是什么都不愿意被询问的情况，礼物多大？美金500元。）
----Dec, 23rd, 2018
2: Heard about why not charity but personal gifting. I don't think this is anything confusing but.., My anger is why can't I gift to my personal friends? and why can't I leave charity matters to those professionals?（听说了有关为什么不做慈善捐款而是个人送礼？我不认为这是什么困扰，而是。。。我的气愤就是我为什么不能个人送礼？我为什么不可以让专业人士处理慈善捐款事宜？）
As I have explained any donation from any investments that my Trust has been investing, there is a portion from my Trust's investing profit share which is my donation share, why can't I leave the handling of this donation share to charity professionals from the investment? Why donation has to be from my living-expenses providing to say I care about families in-needs? Why can't I gift to my personal friends from my after income-tax living-expenses providing? I already made it very clear that I leave donation matters to professionals from those investments each of my Trusts has been investing, and that is it.（就像我已经解释的，所有由我的信托所投资企业的慈善捐款里面，都有我的一部分投资收益在里面一起捐了，我为什么不可以让慈善专业人士处理这类捐款事宜？为什么必须从我的生活费用给付里捐款才可以说我关心那些需要帮助的家庭？为什么我就不可以用我交过收入税后的个人生活费用给付向我私人的朋友们送送礼？我已经讲得很清楚了，所有慈善捐款事宜，我都是交给我的信托所投资的企业处理，就这样。）
----Dec. 23rd, 2018
3: Heard about the confusion regarding HongKong's company 李家信托 which is a commercial company named Li's Family Trust. I don't know exactly what is the confusion, about its name? or about its investment? or about if that is the Trust my grandfather set up for me? or about if I am being the sole beneficiary person of the Trust I inherited.（听说了有关香港的一家商业公司”李家信托“的困扰。我不是太清楚究竟都困扰了些什么，公司名称？公司的业务经营？是否是我爷爷替我设立的信托所设立投资的？以及我是否是我爷爷所指定的信托唯一受益人？）
3-I) Confusion if that is invested by the Trust my grandfather set up for me? I don't know who is confused about this, or why? but this confusion can be helped by Hong Kong's Law enforcement if any lawful interest being impacted by confusion. I myself have already contacted U.S. law enforcement because my lawful interest may have been impacted.（是否这家”李家信托“公司是由我爷爷替我设立的信托所建立所投资的？我不清楚谁在为此困扰，为什么？但是如果自身法律权益因此困扰而受到影响，，这个困扰是可以通过向香港警方求助予以澄清的。我本人就是因为困扰可能影响到了我的合法权益而已经联系了美国警方。)
3-II) Confusion if I am being the sole beneficiary person of the Trust that my grandfather set up for me? This confusion can only be from my grandfather's other children that they can certainly ask Shanghai or Nanjing local law enforcement's help to validate. (*I heard this has been validated already that Li's Family Trust has nothing to do with my grandfather's other children, by Chinese Justice Department 中国司法部) (我是是否是我爷爷替我所设立信托的唯一受益人？这种困扰就只能是我爷爷的其他子女才会有的，他们可以向上海及南京的警方求助澄清核实。（*我听说“李家信托”这家公司和我爷爷的其他子女没有任何关系是中国司法部已经核实了的。）
3-III) Confusion about its name? 李家信托 is a commercial company that may have been established and invested by the wealth(15Million US. Dollar) that was entrusted by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren in 1948. I heard this was the company sent out 500Million US dollar to the United States in 2004 as I requested. The reasons for confusion include （我爷爷和我都姓方，为什么会是“李家信托”？”李家信托“是一家商业公司，据说“李家信托”是在1948年由我爷爷所信托的1500万美金所设立所投资。我听说2004年就是这家公司按我要求电汇5亿美金到美国。相关的困扰有：
4) Confusion about its investments? Who is confused about its investments? and why? Again, I am just a beneficiary person of the Trust who has not involved in its investments, please contact 李家信托 regarding all your confusion about its investments, and please direct your concern if I am bilking to be the beneficiary person associated to 李家信托 to HongKong's law enforcement.（有关“李家信托”这家公司的投资经营？究竟谁在困扰？为什么？我再强调一次，我只是一个信托的受益人，完全不介入信托的投资经营，请就你所有困扰联系”李家信托“这家商业公司，请就你是否怀疑我是在利用“李家信托”这个公司的名字招摇撞骗联系香港警方。
----Dec. 23rd, 2018
12-21-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (5) ---- My online gifting idea
Heard some questions about my online gifting idea.
1: How's the friend's gifting?
My answer: I have not figured out how to validate a friend from an occasion, what would be needed but not intrusive information, etc., and I heard commercial security screening service is a great idea to validate if the information is at least from a friendly and how friendly which would be the basis for gifting size, my past several years' "never lonely" experiences are included. 1) All are appreciated and 2) fair to all, would be the best way to describe my efforts of managing my gifting budget. (My budgeting plan was warned for "hot summer most likely" already. 😘 Luckily I have learned some professional financing and budgeting, and I do take "reserve several years', start with the regular 20Million per year" advice seriously. ）
----Dec 22nd, 2018
2: How long this gifting can possibly prolong?
My answer: I expect this fixed $20Million per year gifting to be permanent because I should be provided at least $400Million yearly. I have been provided so for the past 5 years (including current) already from my 5 birth Chinese grandfathers' Trusts each year, I don't know how many my own birth grandfathers have blessed me so lovingly, but I can certainly expect this $400Million a year from these 5 grandfathers' loving blessing, permanently and forever.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
3: Why I haven't received any blessing if from my own birth grandfathers?
My answer: Because there has been 1) some ownership-confusion regarding these Trusts' investments, and 2) some confusion regarding "what is a Trust" from China (blood associated and not blood-associated), as well as 3) public and legal confusion regarding if any of these payments are from a private investor eventually or from a company that deprived its lawful investor.
Now, most of the ownership confusions (if not all) have been clarified, China seems working on "money lawful ownership means to own money according to laws, not willingness nor deservedness", and all the payments have been clarified according to laws to be upon lawful investors' instructions that no company has deprived its lawful investor. So, I am expecting these payments now and already started my gift-budgeting.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
4: How this "No lawful investor being deprived" been validated if none of these Trusts' registry is open to the public?
My answer: Basically, what I heard is the validation has addressed legal confusions about if a lawful investor possibly being deprived.
1:) According to laws, 6+1 countries' governments' Justice Departments have validated those paying related companies in each of these countries has not deprived each's lawfully registered investor owner.
2:) According to laws, 6+1 countries' governments' Justice Departments have validated those paying related companies in each of these countries have not changed each's lawful investor since each company's establishment, and accumulated years qualified laws' required "over 600 years."
3:) According to laws, 6+1 countries' governments' Justice Departments have validated those paying related companies in each of these countries have not received any complaint filed from each's lawful investor since each's such upon-instruction providing payment(s).
...
So, None of these paying related companies that have provided for me had deprived its investor, and I am qualified for investor tax.
And, all these 6+1 countries are famous for each's economic scale.
So, I am comfortable that none of these Trusts' registry is open to the public.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
5： How can it be so certain that I am the sole beneficiary person?
My answer: I heard it also been validated as well, it was backward validation. Meaning? All the Trusts' registries that set up by my closest five generation grandfathers and my great-grandmother which covers all the legally valid kin are all have been validated, I am the lawful sole beneficiary person for all these Trusts.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
1) 所有的善意我都珍惜，2)不会厚此薄彼，这两点会是我管理这份礼品支出的努力目标。（我已经被警告 “就这速度，很快可能就没钱了。” 😘 幸运的是，我可是已经学过了专业的资金运作和预算决算了，而且我也很认真对待“要有资金储配，第一年就用常规的2千万美金开始“之类的建议。
12-21-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (4)
我的亲朋送礼计划继续引发涟漪, 听说了今天早上所播出的一些澄清和一些疑问。
所澄清的：
1：美国财政部官员证实有收到2004年7月1日办理信托人士所委托款项，也已按照委托要求予以处理，但没提及信托受益人的姓名。
----2018年12月21日
2：Regarding the saying there is no guarantee if I can receive any money from the past several years' payout but from this year's on can be protected by laws.
My comment: Is that from some Chinese citizens? Is that to imply laws have been disabled for the past several years in the United States but can be re-installed from now on? Who can be this privileged to disable laws in the United States? All those paid-out from my Trusts' investments have been in the United States.
----Dec. 21st, 2018
疑问：
1：为何坚持是信托继承？
我的回应：我需要一些就"什么是信托"的法律专业帮助。不是我在坚持自己是信托继承而不让其他人分财产，而是依据法律，我的财产继承是信托继承类别。
我们方家一直都有在分家产时办理信托给年幼孩子的传统，方家血缘关系或多或少都听说过家里有很多分家产时年幼儿子拿到的是信托，等成年后领取的故事。这份“为何坚持是信托继承”的争议是丁姓私人助理家人那里的。
我的愤怒：按照中华人民共和国的法律，丁姓私人助理的所有小孩都是跟随丁姓私人助理夫妻生活长大，由丁姓私人助理夫妻抚养至成年，在他们和我爷爷方智仁既没有任何法律上的领养手续，也没有事实上的领养关系，更没有任何血缘关系的情况下，为何坚持必须以丁姓私人助理和我奶奶毛阿妹有性交关系为理由而抢夺毛阿妹丈夫方智仁的财产？为何坚持只要是方智仁财产，至少一部分就必须归丁姓私人助理的孩子所有？为何丁姓私人助理家人的如此违反中华人民共和国法律的要求居然会得到中华人民共和国政府的协助？
我的信托继承：我所继承的信托是方智仁1948年就已经设立，方智仁所指定的该信托受益人在1948年就已经是方智仁自己的长子方文海所出的“女掌”而不是长子方文海本人，并附有掌纹图。方智仁直至1965年去世都从未改变该信托的受益人。
解释：”女掌“自1948年起就已经是方智仁所信托的该财产的合法拥有者，也就是说该财产自1948年该信托设立伊始就已经从方智仁名下过户到了女掌名下，即方智仁1948年就已经将这笔钱给了其长子方文海所出的“女掌”，所附掌纹图及应该是哪支所出的说明，都是为了指定该家族名字“女掌“究竟是谁。
”女掌”是我爷爷们给我起的家族名字。1967年我出生后，我父亲方文海登记了我的户籍名字为方敏，也就是说，方敏是我父亲方文海给我起的户籍名字。2004年，在验证了我的掌纹后，我以户籍名字方敏继承了存在我的家族名字女掌名下的由方智仁1948年就已经委托给予”女掌”的该信托财产。
如果还不清楚，可以模拟办理一份信托，你就会知道在你所希望的受益人可以在法律上明确界定之后，律师就会要求你将所希望信托的财产交付给律师，也就是说你必须将你自己的存款从银行里取出交付给律师，由律师予以投资或存款，该款项也不再是你自己所拥有钱款，所以是”(1948年)当时就给了”。
----2018年12月21日
2：“为何1948年就给了而不是1965年去世时才给？” 我估计是因为中国当时在闹共产主义，1948年当时的上海已经能感受到当时的国民政府自己已经有了危机感。
----2018年12月21日
3：我拿到的究竟是什么钱？
我的回应：每一个人，在中国在海外，都有可能有三种收入，1）自己工作挣得的工资奖金或者专利费，2）家里父母爷爷奶奶给的，3）婚姻恋爱关系给的。
我方敏1996年10月离开中国就一直在美国学习生活工作了20多年，我所有的财产都是在1996年到了美国以后以后拥有（准确时间是在2004年以后），也很确定我所有财产里面没有一分钱是由中国的国库财政部财政厅财政局支付（目前为止，我的奥运会创意人奖金等都还没有拿到），那么，在我方敏这三种有可能的收入里面，哪一种收入是让中华人民共和国如此举国上下愤怒的？还有哪一类收入是你们认为的方敏的钱财来源？
捐款类别？每年捐款4亿给我用？谁会这么做啊？怪道我就听说了丁姓私人助理的孩子们是到处向人说，不管他们问谁，问哪家企业，问为什么把钱给我，听到都是一片的“都不愿意！！！”
我本人就此已经一再解释了，我的智慧产权收入是我自己的工作收入，我所继承的是一些家里的爷爷奶奶给我的信托，美国有钱的男人女人都没给过我裤裆钱。究竟是什么钱不准我方敏“偷偷”放在自己口袋里，必须让我方敏拿出来放在桌上？
----2018年12月21日
12-20-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (3)
听说了我的亲朋送礼计划在华裔社区引起了一些反响。有关的疑惑：
1：我有钱怎么就送这么一点礼物？
我的回应：还少啊？就这200人左右的血缘关系，每人没几个子儿就已经美金一千万了。我生活费用给付的钱还没拿到，就已经担心每月自己能剩多少。每年4亿，就是每月3500万美金左右。按照美国常规，1/3是房租，如果按照今天早上所播出的对有钱人的期待，5万美金每人的新年红包，血缘关系加同等人数亲朋，我过年那个月的生活费就只剩房租了，绝对是个瘦骨伶仃。其他月份，按照众人期待值是歌舞升平每人5万元，那我就是月月瘦骨伶仃的。不行不行，我坚决拒绝这瘦骨伶仃的有钱人生活。
（在美国，房子不是租的就是买的，所以家居理财专家通常就是建议将收入的1/3作为居住所需的支出以保障日常生活所需的其他支出不会因过高的房屋居住相关支出而受到影响。房贷和房租在金额上有点差别但差别不大，但买房后就成了一个蜗牛背了个房贷30年，房租就轻松很多，有点什么风吹草动的，换个房子搬个家，很容易。国内没有房租，就很难理解为什么必须租这么好的房子，买也是一样，就是这个规模的费用。我对让我少付点房屋支出以增加礼物支出的的看法是，你想要买好房子过好日子，就奇怪我为什么要住好房子？也就是说你认为我应该省吃俭用来让你过上你想过的好日子？你要求我降低我自己的生活水准，来提高你自己的生活水准？我当然拒绝了，又没欠了你什么钱。生活费用的5%（2千万美金每年）是我可以在不降低我自己生活水准的情况下送礼的规模，超过了5%，也就是超过了我的承受能力，那就已经不是亲朋间的送礼了。----2019年1月5日更新）
我的这个每年2千万美金亲朋礼的初衷就是让诸位亲朋在有点难处时，不用为如何开口寻求帮助而费尽思量。就象有些朋友讲的，公司裁员或者自己转换工作，或者家里有点凑手难事，或者自己想要拼搏成才机会，在所有这些面临如何处理解决费用所需及家里财务担心的期间，有了这个亲朋礼可以寻求帮助就不用担心期间的房贷及生活费用，等等了。我个人认为对亲朋来说，这份初衷应该更实在一点。第一年（希望是2019年）的亲朋礼，就是每天只送最多两万五千美金，身体健康所需优先。第二年起每天最多五万美金，也是身体健康类优先。送礼是根据亲朋和我及我父母之间的亲疏而定额度，健康类优先是指优先安排所需款项（包括协助支付医疗保险费用），款项总额会根据我按亲疏定下的额度（每年及总额度）及亲朋自己实际情况考量，会诚实告知在此次健康送礼后多少时间内没有任何礼物。*这个亲朋礼不是慈善性质的，只限于私交亲朋。这几年治疗期间的经历也包括在内。
*目前据说已经由六个国家司法机构证实澄清为合法的生活费用给付，都是至少已经成立600年从未易过手的企业投资人的私人支出。从未易过手的意思就是指公司自成立起就从未更换过投资人也从未被美国任何富豪家族个人（方敏除外）拥有过。
----2018年12月20日。
2：那我过年过节是否还会送礼之类的？
我的回应：可能还会有一些社交往来的礼品支出，有限也只会局限于社交往来。
----2018年12月20日。
3：为何对有钱人的期待值如此高？
我的回应：我听到的好像都是认为可以由公司支付，认为是公司的公款支付又不是我自己的钱就没关系。我必须纠正这种说法，买了股票的人都知道，投资人的收益就是公司挣的钱扣除公司的支出，一旦公司支出过大，就是没有投资收益也就是投资人在赔钱，所以各国法律都是保障投资人利益而对公司支出有严格规定，我作为投资人，我有限的生活费用就是从我的信托的投资收益中领取的，如果再从公司里大笔支出礼品费用，也就是会减少了投资收益而让我的生活费用更有限了，所以我本人不愿意这种由公司支付礼品的方式，要知道所有这些超额公司支出费用按照法律都是必须从投资人自己的股东账户里扣除的，也就是从投资人自己的投资收益里扣除，那我的生活费用给付就少了，所以我本人不愿意，或者说我本人坚决拒绝这种做法。
----2018年12月20日。
4：是否由公司支付可以因为减少了应交的公司税而多点礼品费？
我的回应：各国的税务机关对此类企图都是查的很紧很紧，查到又都是重罚，所以不可能。
----2018年12月20日。
我方敏对我自己亲朋的送礼立场一直就是：送礼从来不是什么欠债必须还钱，更没有什么等不了送礼就居然上门敲诈勒索的，我方敏本人已经就我方敏所面对的“某明奇妙的就好像我欠了谁债似的”索钱压力而报警处理了。
如果有法律依据认为我方敏积欠了某些债务理应偿还，请债权人向债权人自己户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
如果有法律依据认为某些方家后人自己也是某信托的受益人，请这些方家后人向你们各自的户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
有些人说是我特意隐瞒遗嘱藏匿法律依据，所以他们根本没法上法庭。请问是谁的遗嘱又是以什么逻辑思维必须要查看否则是我藏匿证据？我爷爷1965年在上海逝世，我曾祖父是1930年在上海逝世，我曾曾祖父是在1907-1910年左右在上海逝世。因牵涉家里财产继承，这些爷爷去世时各个都是子孙环绕。请问究竟是那一代的祖父如今的在世子女有可能是在其当年的信托设立意愿书遗嘱里有可能被列为该信托的受益人名字所以需要查看核实，最迟的一份信托设立意愿书遗嘱是在1948年就定立了的？更何况，如果我居然藏匿遗嘱以私吞其他人财产就是已经构成刑事犯罪行为，是应该向公安机关举报查缉的，而不是到我这里恐吓要挟的。他们如此对我实施恐吓威胁敲诈勒索，居然还说是我私吞了他们财产？
*目前已经由六个国家司法机构证实澄清的合法给付，都是至少已经成立600年从未转手过的企业投资人私人支出。从未转手过的意思就是从未被美国任何富豪家族个人（方敏除外）拥有过。
----2018年12月17日。
12-19-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (2)
听说了一些亲朋还有一些疑问。也听说了今天早上每年一共就190万美金的说法，不知他们是从何处证实的那一笔，反正也是在说已经证实了我自己有钱了。
12-18-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划
听说今天早上的中文播出提到我的生活费用给付全部都已经核实为合法给付，也就是我就等着通知我领取了。希望快点。
有人问为何要由政府核实是否合法给付？
我的回答：就只是因为我的信托登记不是公开资料，所以需由一些相关国家的司法机关核实由该国的一些商业公司在美国所投资企业支出的私人给付是否合法以及我应以何种税率支付美国的个人所得税，等等。
有关我的送礼计划，我是固定了每年两千万美金，包括一次性的血缘关系送礼。亲戚的礼物我已经在2004年就已经表态会在2015年左右送出，延迟并非我本人所愿，中间一些变故各方也都已经表态。
我个人认为血缘关系并不是亲戚关系，但这不是在说我排斥友善的血缘关系，所以，血缘关系礼虽然只有一次，但我欢迎他们继续向我索取心仪的亲朋礼（因担心亲朋会有一些累积的健康类紧急用钱需要，第一年可能会除外）。
父系一次性血缘关系送礼计划（总值约670万元美金）：
我父系方家一等亲，二等亲以及我奶奶娘家兄弟（我父母称呼为舅舅舅妈的）都被我称为亲戚，已在2004年表态愿意送礼。
我父系方家三至五等亲，血缘关系礼总值约335万美金左右。
我父系方家六至十等亲，血缘关系礼总值约335万美金左右。
母系一次性血缘关系送礼计划（总值约165万元美金）：
我外祖父王怀迎亲生子女，血缘关系礼总值约65万元美金
我母亲王博贤父系一至四等亲，血缘关系礼总值约100万元美金。(我母亲的妈妈是我母亲童年不快乐的根本原因，所以没有我母亲母系的血缘关系礼）
亲朋礼（第一年总额约1165万美金左右，以后每年2000万美金），
我会根据各位与我本人及我父母的亲善友好关系决定并诚实告知我愿意送礼的规模（一次性或者每年，等等）。
欢迎各位亲朋在听说我已经收到每年4亿美金的生活费用给付后与我联系索取心仪礼物。目前确定的联络电邮是somebodyinma@gmail.com 和 somebodyinBoston@gmail.com
请注意事项：
1：如果不是提供商业银行账号让我直接付帐，请注意自己的财务信息安全。
2：美国有礼品赠与税，所以会有扣税。2019年，赠与税免税额为每人终身为一千一百四十万美元，每年为一万五千元。超过免税额者，应缴40%的赠与税。（http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/18/11/17/n10858852.htm）
----2018年12月18日。
我方敏对我自己亲朋的送礼立场一直就是：送礼从来不是什么欠债必须还钱，更没有什么等不了送礼就居然上门敲诈勒索的，我方敏本人已经就我方敏所面对的“某明奇妙的就好像我欠了谁债似的”索钱压力而报警处理了。
如果有法律依据认为我方敏积欠了某些债务理应偿还，请债权人向债权人自己户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
如果有法律依据认为某些方家后人自己也是某信托的受益人，请这些方家后人向你们各自的户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
有些人说是我特意隐瞒遗嘱藏匿法律依据，所以他们根本没法上法庭。请问是谁的遗嘱又是以什么逻辑思维必须要查看否则是我藏匿证据？我爷爷1965年在上海逝世，我曾祖父是1930年在上海逝世，我曾曾祖父是在1907-1910年左右在上海逝世。因牵涉家里财产继承，这些爷爷去世时各个都是子孙环绕。请问究竟是那一代的祖父如今的在世子女有可能是在其当年的信托设立意愿书遗嘱里有可能被列为该信托的受益人名字所以需要查看核实，最迟的一份信托设立意愿书遗嘱是在1948年就定立了的？更何况，如果我居然藏匿遗嘱以私吞其他人财产就是已经构成刑事犯罪行为，是应该向公安机关举报查缉的，而不是到我这里恐吓要挟的。他们如此对我实施恐吓威胁敲诈勒索，居然还说是我私吞了他们财产？
----2018年12月17日。
12-17-2018 O'Connors True Anger has been...
I heard my yesterday's blog article has made some O's shade their tears and I also heard a lot of people do think that was a horrible scene, and why it has to be like that.
O's confusion has been almost 200 years long stories. On July 1st of 2004, when O's angrily emphasized, again and again, that they disagree I had inherited that company already and they refused to spend that money as I wished, there was not a single person made a sound but my spending continued. This horrible scene has angered O's for all this time since that day.
The reason nobody made a sound was because
1:) O's confusion has been almost 200 years' long, full of stories and fights.
2:) I did not inherit that American company, that American company has been owned entirely by its British Investor company for about 400 years. What I inherited is a Trust that has been investing in that American company through its upstream investors' chain, but not the American company itself.
3:) It was already very obvious at the moment that I did not intend to spend their money and it would be ensured not their money.
I am so sorry for that horrible feeling from this. Please let be known if there were similar horrible scenes. That horribleness was not because of any negativeness from all those insensitive everyone.
----Dec. 17th, 2018
听说了上海方面对我是唯一受益人的困扰。
我的回应：我爷爷方智仁是在1948年就已经将钱款转入我本人名下而不是我父亲方文海名下，用的是我的小名女掌设立的信托（也就是存款单）并附图注明了”女掌“这个女孩是其长子方文海这支所育的有家族胎记掌纹的一个孙女。我爷爷最大的一个孙子女是在1964年出生，但我爷爷方智仁直至去世都没有改变信托是为方智仁自己的小名“女掌”的孙女所设立的意愿。我其他爷爷替我所设立的信托也是一样，都是在办理信托时就已经将钱款转入了小名女掌的孙女名下并附图说明了谁才是这个小名女掌的孙女。所以我方敏是我所继承的这些信托的唯一受益人。
我是2004年继承的，所继承的是爷爷信托特意给我的财产。解释如下：我父亲方文海2004年身体健康根本就没有去世所以就根本没有任何我父亲方文海的财产可以被任何人在2004年继承。我爷爷方智仁是1965年去世，我爷爷方智仁亲生子女都已经在1965年各自按照方智仁本人遗嘱继承了方智仁自己所分配的，方智仁自己名下的所有全部方智仁自己所遗留下的财产。我所继承的信托是按照爷爷方智仁的愿望在1948年就已经特意给了我的财产，我爷爷方智仁直至1965年去世都没有改变这份愿望也从未更改该信托的设立意愿书（遗嘱）。我其他爷爷也是类似。
信托受益人的意思就是所信托的财产已经委托他人管理，信托受益人只是每年从该信托领取生活费用，但不介入所信托财产的经营管理。我方敏作为这些信托的唯一受益人，不介入我所继承的这些信托所投资企业的业务经营管理。
我方敏已经表明了在收到我的信托给付的每年生活费用后，会在此博客宣布向我的亲朋送礼的方式以方便亲朋向我索取心仪礼物。但我方敏必须强调我方敏没有欠了亲朋钱财，我方敏也不会允许任何人以我方敏名义敲诈勒索任何企业。我所继承这些信托所投资的企业也都非常清楚我方敏立场，也就是我方敏自己的亲朋我方敏自己送礼，我方敏自己有钱就不会需要企业的工作人员用他们自己有限的工资或者办公经费替我送礼。
我方敏对我自己亲朋的送礼立场一直就是：送礼从来不是什么欠债必须还钱，更没有什么等不了送礼就居然上门敲诈勒索的，我方敏本人已经就我方敏所面对的“某明奇妙的就好像我欠了谁债似的”索钱压力而报警处理了。
如果有法律依据认为我方敏积欠了某些债务理应偿还，请债权人向债权人自己户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
如果有法律依据认为某些方家后人自己也是某信托的受益人，请这些方家后人向你们各自的户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
有些人说是我特意隐瞒遗嘱藏匿法律依据，所以他们根本没法上法庭。请问是谁的遗嘱又是以什么逻辑思维必须要查看否则是我藏匿证据？我爷爷1965年在上海逝世，我曾祖父是1930年在上海逝世，我曾曾祖父是在1907-1910年左右在上海逝世。因牵涉家里财产继承，这些爷爷去世时各个都是子孙环绕。请问究竟是那一代的祖父如今的在世子女有可能是在其当年的信托设立意愿书遗嘱里有可能被列为该信托的受益人名字所以需要查看核实，最迟的一份信托设立意愿书遗嘱是在1948年就定立了的？更何况，如果我居然藏匿遗嘱以私吞其他人财产就是已经构成刑事犯罪行为，是应该向公安机关举报查缉的，而不是到我这里恐吓要挟的。他们如此对我实施恐吓威胁敲诈勒索，居然还说是我私吞了他们财产？
----2018年12月17日。
12-16-2018 Money lawful ownership never changes upon confusion（财产的法律拥有权从不因困扰而改变）
If I have money should be the matter of lawful ownership, not upon personal authentication to own or be dis-owned.
Money ownership change has been strictly law matter throughout history, never eligible to be changed upon personal opinions.
Example of lawful ownership never change upon confusion：
The British East India Company, the one with the troops, has never changed its ownership, nor its most famous French Financier company's American Investment. The British East India Company's most famous French Financier company's British investment has been the owner of this American Investment for over 400 years. My shared ownership confusion with O' name since July 1st of 2004 about this American Investment never changed its lawful ownership. Both O' name and I have changed both sides sayings about the matter after its lawful owner, the French Financier company's British Investment, has clarified the ownership confusion. I never won the argument of who actually owns this American Investment from O' name. I just backed off quietly from its lawful ownership. O' name has been closely associated with this American company's investment decisions for almost two centuries was the reason for their confusion, my inherited Trust has been investing in the company was the reason for my confusion. There have been a lot of uncomfortable feelings from O' name after my anxiety outbreak,
I publicly apologize sincerely to O' name for all my misbehaves during my anxiety outbreak.
----Dec. 16th, 2018
Also, I heard this morning's broadcasting of arranged child announcement. It is funny that nobody even knows who can be that child, or if ever exists. Nobody even needs to ask who or why need to make such arranged child announcement, the reason is already well-known for year-s "too many on-air time but no contents".
----Dec 16th, 2018
Currently, I still don't know who is demanding fiercely for "same equal ownership" for everything I lawfully solely own, not really from my maiden name but definitely from China. Everything means my male, my residence house, my dresses, etc. I have been named a whore-level concerned person to prevent me to go to any residence that is owned by those who have no association with me for over 20 or 30 years already, but my residence house and my male have been publicly demanded "should be open for sharing is those Chinese married females' basic right", with the help from some R-names.
All these angry toned expressions "I don't want you to see my husband or my house, I am sensitive about it all. But I have to come to your house, I am his wife and capable to bear a child biologically is already proved." Who the fxxx is this?
----Dec 16th, 2018
我有钱没钱都是法律所决定的，不由任何人的个别意愿所授权拥有或者所剥夺而失去。
财产法律拥有权的改变一直都是严格的法律管辖事务，从来不因个人的意见需求而改变。
举例说明财产的法律拥有权从不因困扰而改变：
美国的欧家人和我之间对于英国的东印度公司（就是有军队的那个）最著名的法国投资公司在美国所投资的企业的法律拥有权困扰是从2004年7月1日就开始了。在英国东印度公司的法国投资公司的英国下属投资公司出面说明后，欧家人和我都纠正了各自的说法。我从未在这场谁才拥有这家美国公司的争执中吵赢了欧家人，我就只是在该公司的法定拥有权的主人出面澄清后就退却没再吵了。欧家人参与这家美国公司的投资决策都已经有近两个世纪了，所以他们有点困绕，而我是因为继承了一个一直都有投资该公司的信托而困扰了。吵过之后欧家人对我是很生气了。
我在此公开郑重为我自己惊慌失措时所有的不恰当行为向欧家人公开道歉。
----2018年12月16日。
听听这些所谓中国已婚女人的愤怒声音：“我就是不愿意你见我的丈夫（父亲）或者到我家里来，我就是介意。可我就是一定要到你家，我是他的老婆（女儿）有生孩子能力已经证明了（或者是可以证明给你看的）。"这究竟是哪个老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的愤怒声音？
居然公开号召，公开宣传说只要是我同一个中学大学工作单位的同学校友同事就可以如此要求，不管是不是朋友或者毕业后辞职后有没有任何联络？他们是同学校友同事？根本就是一群老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的而已。我就是一定会就此申请法庭禁制令。我家就是不需要你们这些老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的。
有人说这些愤怒是因为看不惯我说自己有钱是想要有钱男人自己并不想给的裤裆钱，我就奇怪如果你们看不惯，你们怎么各个都是一副你们自己才是真正有奶子屁股的真正中国，所以就是应该把钱拿走，至少也是平分共享的态度？如果你们不是一群老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的，你们怎么会因为瞧不起我的钱有可能是有钱男人自己都不想给的裤裆钱就把你们自己的奶子屁股塞进来一定要求分享？
请参阅 12-06-2018 和南京方面的矛盾（7） ---- 南京药检所及其他
还有，就是所有这些一副曾经认识过我就有欠债所以必须还钱的声音，请说明究竟欠了你们什么债，多少价码？需要如何还清？定价的理由及依据是什么？
南京师范大学附属中学高中毕业的绝大多数（包括罗雪梅），南京四中初中毕业的绝大多数，以及上海医大毕业的绝大多数，和我都是从无各自之间的婚姻家庭社交往来，也永远不会有任何必须的类似社交往来。
南京四中初中毕业的王朝晖是因为可能曾以我朋友身份协助我弟弟的婚姻家庭虐待我母亲王博贤而被我永远拒绝往来。
南京四中初中毕业的胡宁因和中国总理李克强的婚姻家庭是亲密朋友关系而被我拒绝往来。
请参阅 是否是为了谋财害命？
----Dec. 16th, 2018
12-15-2018 我奶奶从来没有爱上丁姓私人助理
听说了今天早上所提到的，
有人问：我是否有指控中国的国务院总理李克强是在谋财害命。
我的回应：是，如果在2013年9月20日前后一个星期左右的时间里，当时已经80多岁的我父亲被中国的国务院总理李克强拉上总理的小轿车后，再在车子启动慢速行驶的情况下将我父亲推下车来造成我父亲头部着地摔在街上是真实，我就是在2017-2018年间听说后就已经通过以电邮向纽约的中国领事馆投诉此事而指控中国国务院总理李克强谋财害命未遂。我父亲的“死亡证书”开具时间是2013年10月3日。
----2018年12月15日。
有人问我奶奶毛阿妹为何愿意和丁姓私人助理交往？两人是否有性关系？一些相关博文是否在指控丁姓私人助理涉嫌为谋财而谋杀了我爷爷方智仁以及我奶奶毛阿妹。
我的回应：我听说两人有性关系是丁姓私人助理家人因为拥有两人性交关系证据而态度强硬的原因。我也听说了第一次发生是我奶奶独自一人在家时，在她自己的卧房里被卡着脖子摁在床上强奸。
我奶奶因为常年面对很多女性逼我爷爷“为爱离婚”的压力，个性很强。我相信她不是自愿和一个已经是三个孩子父亲的37岁长相粗陋，就只有五年制小学毕业文化程度又是被我爷爷雇佣的一个私人助理有什么恋爱关系。我爷爷是大学毕业很清秀和我奶奶同岁又是指腹为婚成年即成亲了，我奶奶自己是初中毕业文化程度，她很清楚其他那些女性听说会是什么态度。虽然我奶奶在家里家外一直都是母后娘娘“不可能离婚”的待遇，那些女性每次看我奶奶大手笔花她自己的零用钱而评论我奶奶“就只是有钱而已”的愤怒还是会经常让我奶奶感受到很大压力。
我是在博文里分析指控丁姓私人助理可能涉嫌为谋财而谋杀了我爷爷方智仁以及我奶奶毛阿妹。我听说的： 我爷爷奶奶两人都是因为小恙被丁姓私人助理送进医院后就必须住院治疗，我爷爷奶奶都是投诉他在他们两人各自住院期间不准我爷爷奶奶在医院里花我爷爷奶奶自己的钱而且因为什么原因就是不能出院回家，两人也都是再也没有回家，两人都是死在医院里（1958 和1965），我父亲及其弟妹应继承的钱财被丁姓私人助理所拥有或所支配都是在1965年我爷爷去世前后，不是1958年。
----2018年12月15日。
有人问我是否因此而担心我现在的脑控癌治疗？
我的回应：我因为此治疗而安全。脑控癌治疗技术是远程技术，不需要登记住院就有可能会担心“谁在治疗？”。而我因为提供治疗的单位而安全了。
我在此提醒方家亲戚方家后人请注意自己人身安全，我自己已经就自己的怀疑及指控而报警求助了。
----2018年12月15日。
听说了我父亲弟妹询问她本人的生活费用应该由谁支付？
我的回应：我所继承的信托里没有我父亲或者我父亲弟弟妹妹的任何钱款，所以我不知道我父亲弟弟的妻子生活费用应该由谁支付。我本人在收到2004年香港汇出的钱款后会安排处理我自己在2004年所表达的愿意送礼事宜，我不清楚他们收到后会如何安排他们各自的生活费用。在我的礼物未送出前，我父亲弟弟妹妹没收到礼钱就不是因为一些外在原因而符合法律调查条件，所以就不会有任何司法协助。我的父母子女是我的法律责任义务所瞻养所抚养，所以如果我的一些收入因为某些原因没有收到且符合法律调查条件，我的父母子女因为依靠我的收入才能生活所以会有相应的司法协助维持基本生活。
据说还有王姓人士就是够资格和我要钱。我只强调我方敏没欠我外公王怀迎的任何子女的任何钱款，更未欠了两三百年前什么山东王姓人士后人的任何钱款。91%DNA至少是8个曾的九等亲血缘关系，也就是200年前的什么血缘关系，他们据说就是认定我母亲姓王又漂亮，他们也姓王一定都漂亮，所以居然要我因此给付至少每月1万美金，这可是在我已经宣布一年一共就两千万美金的经费之后。我又没长个男阳具，也没欠了王家的吊钱，这些王姓人士根本就是一群居然指望着他们才是正宗可以靠舔吊讨饭的娼妓老母狗而已。我方敏就是这态度就是这么明确告诉那些王家人，你们他妈的又算老几，一群讨饭的娼妓老母狗老讨饭的而已，也配要美金一万每月？我方敏就是不会怕了你们王家人就是多的威胁恐吓。我方敏坚决拒绝王姓人士的任何类似敲诈勒索要求。
----2018年12月15日。
12-14-2018 Other than eyes, nose and mouth, I resemble my father impressively (除了五官，我和我父亲长得是在太像了）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting, how many birthmarks I may carry.
Well, I know I am after my father in almost everyway, in ways how we turn and how we move, in ways how we sit and how we stand, and in ways how we talk and how we are looking at.
Not only I have my father's palms as birthmark, I also have my father's forehead which may also a family birthmark: Both my father and his youngest sister have this family forehead from my grandfather so distinctive, even though it is definitely not abnormally huge at all (not even a five-head), that the first impression of seeing anyone of us approaching is the dominant impression of such a huge forehead, then is our looks.
And, I have alot more such distinctive places on my appearance from my father that may also be our family birthmarks.
听说了今天早上播出的内容，就是我身上还有多少家族胎记。
我和我父亲很像很像，我们的言谈举止，坐姿立式，回眸抬眉，都是像的不得了。
不只我有我父亲的掌纹胎记，我也有和我父亲一模一样的的大脑门前额，估计也是家里的胎记。我父亲和他的小妹妹都有和我的爷爷一模一样的大脑门前额，虽然不是大到感觉脸都有点畸形的那种(连五指宽都没到），但是真的是很显眼的，就是你要是第一次看见我们当中的任何一个，向你走过来的时候你就会有一个非常深刻的第一影响，就是这人的脑门前额好大啊，然后你才会看见我们的五官长得什么样。
我身上还有好多类似非常明显的和我父亲相似的地方，可能也是我们的家族胎记。
----Dec. 14th, 2018
有人说王博真去世我也没听说，怎么不愤怒啊？
我的回答：因为我很清楚不告诉我王博真去世消息是王博真本人及其全家特意所为的，就为了不让我听说了什么消息后冲到南京去抢了王博真自己从来没打算给我的东西。我哪里会有一丝一毫的难过啊？
我父亲的情况就不一样了，我父亲“2013年去世前”都不需要知道我是否还活着，我也不需要知道我父亲任何情况，就只为了让我父亲无助，让我父亲心寒，让我父女俩永远都知道并且永远记住我们从来都不受中华人民共和国的欢迎，我爷爷方智仁当初留在中华人民共和国是个永远应该后悔的决定而已。我的愤怒就是中华人民共和国还是一个宪法有效的法治国家吗？我相信我父母和我的子女也确实是永远都会记得。
这也就是我方敏对传闻中的彭丽媛近期在美国的国宴上所做的“她也就是自作多情（"she is just self-indulging"（再英译中一次意思就又成了“她也就只有自摸自摸而已”)”说法的正式回应了。
----2018年12月14日
12-13-2018 Why I am so miserable if I do have my own money?
Why I am so miserable if I do have my own money? The answer is very simple, the R-names plus their in-laws and their cousins made the headcounts over 400, but I am one individual.
How come my Trusts' businesses don't come to the rescue? They are already at wherever R-investments are harassing.
The huge issue is the personal phone-calls and on-foot friends-visiting from over 400 R-names'(including associated), but I have already sent out over 100 emails to call police officers to help out.
Exactly, what has been the story? It is all about whose money I have been provided for. Have you noticed, one-child-only families among R-names are much relaxed and easy to believe I have my own money? The reason? Because it is indeed very easy to verify it is never their money. But for those R-names families who have several children, well, you heard those adult children's screams "We are going to find out exactly whose money" on the radio for over 5 years, my responsive howling "I have my own money" for over 3 years (one year on the radio, two years on my web blog).
What was the story on July 1st of 2004? A lot said if my Illustrated story of July 1st of 2004 was what happened, normally there would be some questions asked from the "CEO's group" and there would be some proudness from "my colleagues' group", especially when both groups are American businesses.
So, what was exchanged on July 1st of 2004?
CEO started screaming: "I said I am not going to spend that money".
I started laughing and continued: "I want to have...."
Angry CEO's group to CEO: "Not going to be our spending. Guarantee you."
My colleagues' group: "She got her own money good."
Obviously know both party group to CEO: "Promised not going to be your money. Don't worry about it."
Mild CEO's group: "What is the business?"
Proud my colleagues' group proudly: "(pronunciation) The Pinctos."
Mild CEO's group all puzzled: "Never heard of."
Proud my colleagues' group: "What is yours?"
Mild CEO's group proudly (Accurate recording here): "The Center."
Proud my colleagues' group all bewildered: "Never heard of"and "That is a building!"
Outsider group I (Chinese government) look at everybody and concluded: "She is spending the money that American rich never even intend to give."
Outsider group II (worldwide business and non-business groups) kept blinking their eyes: "What is The Pinctos? What is The Center? What is going on here?"
What happened since that day? The angry exchange "Whose money????" and "Never your money!!!!" between R-investments and my Trusts' businesses for over 14 years now (all American business for both groups), the R-names determination to clarify "never Min Fang's money" on the radio, and my howling "I have my own birth Chinese grandfathers' gifts."
The Pinctos (pronunciation) is a Financial Institute's name, The Center is the famous Rockefeller Center in NYC.
This is the story that has been recorded in that day's teleconference record.
----Dec. 13th, 2018
我是2017年5月至6月间在波士顿96.9FM上才听懂洛克菲勒家的气愤是因他们认为我2004年7月1日这天不经他们家任何人同意就花了他们很多钱，从那天起，所有和我那天花钱相关的人员都是一直在解释及处理。
----2018年12月13日。
据说很多南京师范大学附属中学的校友认为我在上海医科大学所学的只是药学医学类的专业教育，不可能是我能拿到非医药科技智慧产权收入的原因（化学及数理相关的)。
我的解释：看一下我在上海医科大学的药学院时念书时期的教材和课程安排就很清楚了。
1：第一年，高等数学，所使用教材是同济大学编辑，为其一年（两个学期）
2：第一年，无机化学，所使用教材是南京大学化学系编辑的教材（记不清了，也可能是南京师范大学或者华东师大），为其一年（两个学期）。
3：第二年，有机化学，教材是记不清了，为其一年（两个学期）。
4：第三年至第五年，所有基础医学类的教学内容，教材，老师及实验设施都是由上海医科大学（原上海第一医学院）自己的的基础医学部所提供的。药学类的教学内容，教材，老师及实验设施都是由上海医科大学（原上海第一医学院）自己的药学院所提供的。
5：电脑科技是在美国学的。当时高等数学可以免修就是因为大学里学高等数学时就是工程类院校所使用的同济大学所编辑的高等数学。化学类教材是师范大学化学系的使用教材。
6：我的语言才华：我爷爷中有文学才华横溢的唐玄宗李隆基，南唐后主“词帝”李煜是真实。我父亲方文海退休前也是做了多年的天文学报编辑。
----2018年12月13日。
12-12-2018 Why I still claim I have money after R-names are so publicly denounced me?（洛家人都已经一次次申明和我没有关系了，我怎么还在说自己有钱？）
Some asked what exactly is the confusion between me and Rockefeller's name.（中文附后）
中文大意：
12-11-2018 如果其他方家后人和我要钱，都是爷爷后代，给我钱的爷爷们会帮谁？
听说了有些方家后人难以释怀，认为现在不骚扰就再也不会有钱了。
我的回答：现在骚扰，我也已经要求报警要求刑事调查是否敲诈勒索，我也不会客气。我是按每一个爷爷的遗嘱继承每一个爷爷给我的钱，给我钱的这些爷爷们也没给我留下未还的风流欠债账单需要我来还，所以我是睬都不会睬这些要钱的要求的。
----2018年12月11日。
至于说是爷爷的钱，如果他们就是一定要，都是爷爷后代方家后人，给钱的爷爷会帮谁？
我的回答：爷爷只帮我方敏是肯定的。因为爷爷对所有的孙子辈都不认识，钱是爷爷自己的钱，他想给的是我方敏，就不会帮他其他的孩子和我抢钱。他自己的儿子女儿一辈，他也都已经按他自己心愿给予，也不会帮他们和我抢钱。
我所有的爷爷中，也就只有方智仁这个爷爷有子女这一辈还在世，也就只有这个爷爷把他自己大部分的钱都给了我，可我送礼也很大方啊，方智仁爷爷和毛阿妹奶奶绝对不是够资格抱怨我小气的一个，他们又没给我多少，方智仁爷爷1948年就给了我一共就1500万美金，而我2004年愿意给他孩子们的礼物一人就是8000万美金还多（就是五亿人民币），从礼物里扣钱是因为他的孩子们为钱和我闹腾，就算是方智仁爷爷在世，我都会坚持就是要按闹腾的程度扣钱。其他给我钱的爷爷们统统都是方智仁爷爷自己的祖宗，也不是方智仁爷爷够资格帮任何人要钱要东西吵闹骂砸的。
----2018年12月11日。
至于说是丁姓私人助理的家人究竟算什么？凭什么我不算他们是家人？
我的回答：丁姓私人助理一家从来不是方家的任何人。
第一，我方敏的每月一万美金生活费用（1967-1996）不是毛阿妹丈夫方智仁的钱，不是毛阿妹自己的钱，也不是毛阿妹娘家给的嫁妆，所以，我所有的爷爷奶奶都会帮着我方敏。一切也都已经由美国的汇款公司依据法律在进行处理。
第二，方智仁替我方敏所设立的信托是由方智仁所继承的其父亲所给予方智仁的财产所设立，由方智仁自己的血脉传承方敏所拥有是方智仁自己的意愿。方智仁从无意愿雇佣任何人作为他自己的妻子毛阿妹的性交伙伴，更无意愿让方家财产被丁姓私人助理家人掠夺。我方敏按照方智仁遗嘱所继承的信托财产从来不是丁姓私人助理的钱财。我所有的爷爷奶奶也都是只会帮我方敏。
第三，我方敏骂了毛阿妹，一点不会担心毛阿妹生气更不会担心毛阿妹报复我，就因为丁姓私人助理是个又老又丑的。我听说的，50年代的他当时都已经37岁了，不光是已婚，都还已经有了三个孩子，长得就像于是之，从来不是什么英俊小生。我爷爷奶奶天天被他们全家五口白吃白喝还天天饭桌上被他们出言顶撞公然挑衅。我就是一直在问我奶奶当年作为有钱人家的太太，想找男人玩玩气气一辈子都是花花公子的我爷爷，为什么不找个年轻英俊的演员或者漂亮小伙之类，怎么还被他们一家骂到惨不忍听？当年究竟是怎么回事？据说丁姓私人助理当时150-200元的工资是我爷爷支付，他老婆一个月纺织厂女工的工资只有5元至13元的人民币。1948年替我这个孙女设立信托后，我爷爷就已经把绝大多数的钱转入我奶奶名下，我奶奶当时和他们一家是没法比的富裕。我奶奶1958年突然在家晕倒被丁姓私人助理送医院后留院治疗，我爷爷才紧急把钱全部转回他自己名下。
----2018年12月11日。
12-10-2018 Why my living is so shabby in Boston but kept on saying I am a wealthy person not on romance money? (我在波城过的是穷人日子怎么还老是说自己有钱但不是在妄想裤裆钱）
Heard this morning's talk about why I looked so shabby in Boston, Massachusetts.
When I am on a welfare standard, what else to expect but shabby? My anger has been it has been so loud on the radio that whenever anyone needs some money, it is so proudly on the radio to assign out my expected providing for living expenses as if I owe anyone of those demanded so much money. I have to clarify that I never owe them any money nor any living expenses providing is the only reason they can not file any lawsuit to demand money from a valid judicial court.
I think the root problem is why those prominent wives who have the privileged power to grab the microphone so expect themselves to be privileged enough to change "my money's" lawful ownership, as long as that is assumed my money and as long as they are really having acknowledged romances with really good men who are so willing to testify so with the emphasis on how my romance was never wanted, even after I kept on responding I never had such biological male part biologically on my biological female body? (meaning? I am obviously expected a truly privileged person to truly understand the value of such advertisement, but.....)
When there are no judicial arguments about the lawful ownership of this or that money,
When those prominent wives are not even privileged to file lawsuits to express their own opinions about lawful ownership of the money because those are the money they never own,
Why would they so expect themselves to be privileged to change the money's lawful ownership through a public microphone?
Why I have to live on social security's welfare because they are wives live on their own males but I am a female financially self-independent?
As those prominent males, including those who I have met and those who I never even heard of, already declared they never gave me a penny, they never intended to give me a penny and they determined never would give me a penny. And, I have to add loudly that I never demand any romance money from any male but kept saying I have inherited money since June 30th of 2004. So, I am a financially independent female.
As any financially independent person, my incomes comes from profession related which I call my intellectual property income and my inherited money from my birth Chinese grandfathers as their willed sole beneficiary person.
So, I ask these two questions out of my anger calmly:
Which one of these money-incomes that is claimed my money has any judicial argument(s) regarding its lawful ownership?
Why is this "privileged to take over to leave me penniless" if there is some money that is assumed my money?
Who is the privileged person can change the lawful ownership of which specific money from my incomes sources without my own willingness? I refuse that person's such privilege, for whoever that person might be.
I am so glad I am protected by LAWS, I am so happy I have great entrusting attorneys, I just need to cope with shabby living for the time being.
----Dec. 10th, 2018
Some said if he or she is the person who said I have money, this same person can change this person's such saying.
My response: I have to ask why this person said I have money in the past？ a reporting effort to say what this person had heard of? had verified of? And if so, how this person can deprive this reported money's lawful ownership by changing this person's own reporting of it?
Or had this person authorized me to have some money? then, what privileged this person to authorized what money to me? how much and where is that money should expect from? In the United States, unknown money source is a crime.
----Dec. 10th, 2018
Some said, how this paid-out is your money.
My explanation: I use an example to illustrate this for anyone who is not a business person.
An attorney registered a law firm and used this law firm bought a property as an office. This attorney can only claim to be the owner of this office property because of the ownership of the law firm.
It is the same to a commercial company A that is owned by another commercial company B, this means no one can claim to be the owner of the commercial company A unless this person is the owner of the commercial company B, and if this commercial company B is owned by the commercial company C, then, no one can claim to be the owner of the commercial company A unless being the owner of the commercial company C, and so on so forth.
Hope this can help clarify the confusion regarding the instructed paid-out money from those paying American companies. I heard it is proven those are all my lawful money already even though my Trust registry is not open to the public. How? I think that is law professionals specialty to answer, not me, at least not yet.
----Dec. 10th, 2018
中文大意：
据说今天早上提到我在麻州波士顿的生活很清贫，确实如此。我现在的生活标准是麻州民政救济部门的救济标准，还能是什么样的生活水平？
我的气愤：
只要认为有可能是我的钱，就来了一堆所谓人妻就是够资格把这钱给东给西到处送人或者归他们自己留着自用。好像我欠了他们多少钱似的。我只好在此声明，我从未欠过他们任何钱财是他们不够资格在有效的法庭上进行法律诉讼官司索取钱财的原因。
在这些钱财的法律所有权没有任何法学法理上的争议的情况下，在他们自己因为从来不是财产曾经的合法主人或者财产可能的合法主人，所以根本就不够资格上法庭就财产进行任何官司诉讼以表达他们自己就财产法律所有权的任何立场的情况下，为什么总是有这么一些所谓人妻因为有权有势能够抢的着公共频道的话筒就是够资格擅自更改钱财的法律所有权？在我一再强调我是个女的情况下，她们那里来的这份就凭“和某些好男人有性交经历且被好男人所认可，并且愿意广而告之此事实”就可以够资格拿光我的每一分钱收入，就是够资格让我本人过美国政府施援救助的救济水平的贫困生活？
在所有我见过的我听都没听说过的有钱男人一个个的宣布他们从没给过我钱，从未打算给我钱，也下定决心永远不给我钱之后，我本人再加上一句：我从未要过一分一毫的裤裆钱，而是从2004年6月30日起一直在宣称我是继承了财产。所以，我说我方敏自己是一个财务独立的女性。
就像所有财务独立的人一样，我的收入来源有两种，一种是职业相关的，也就是我称为智慧产权的收入，还有就是我自己家里传承的，也就是我宣称我是我爷爷们遗嘱指定的唯一受益人所继承到的财产。
因为法律的保护，我现在是已经可以隐忍愤怒很平静的问几个问题了：
第一：我的上述收入来源里哪一笔钱，就其法律拥有权归属是有法学法理上的争议的？
第二：又是哪一个人有如此权势可以在我本人不愿意的情况下任意改变我的合法财产所有权让我本人身无分文？也就是为什么只要是认为有可能是我的钱，这人那人就是够资格直接擅自更改其法律所有权？究竟是哪一笔钱又是凭的什么资格？不管这人是谁，我方敏本人坚决拒绝这个人的任何资格。
真是很开心，我其实一直有受到法律的保护，我有这么好的信托律师真实很幸运。
----2018年12月10日。
有人说，如果是因为我说你有钱，你就一直说你有钱，那我现在就改口。
我的回答：那我就地问你，你当初为什么会说我有钱？是在报道你所听说过的，你所证实过的吗？那你为什么认为现在你只要自己改口就可以改变你所报道过的该钱财的法律所有权？
或者你只是你自己在授权我可以有钱，那我就需要问你是以什么身份授权我可以有点钱？是什么钱？多少钱？钱应该从哪里来？在美国，不明来源的钱是会被作为可能是犯罪的收入而被警方刑事调查的。
----2018年12月10日。
12-06-2018 和南京方面的矛盾（7） ---- 南京药检所及其他
听说了今天早上所播出。
听说了南京药检所是今天早上对我敏居然号称有钱予以驳斥“谁会给钱？”
我方敏的回答：
既然方敏的钱不是你们中的任何一个裤裆里给出来的，也不是你们中间的哪一个人从某个有钱男人的裤裆里讨出来的，你们又都已经表达立场你们不是我方敏的任何朋友也不会在乎我方敏利益，我方敏的钱是怎么回事就和你们这些人都无关了。
一切依据法律，财产所有权应该是由法律所决定的。既然你们统统都不是法学专业人士，就请不要招摇撞骗社会大众似乎你们才是法律权威一切事务的专家。
1：1990年认识的南京药检所陶光耀：我对你从来没有任何性需求也没有任何的性要求，自1996年至今也没有任何联络，你既然已经表明不是朋友的立场，我方敏也没有任何社交或者工作需要和你有任何联络，更没有任何需要认识你的婚姻家庭让你的妻子承受如此压力表达如此立场。我方敏在此声明我和1990年认识的南京药检所陶光耀本人及其婚姻家庭没有任何关系。请相信这是真实。
（听说了中国大陆很多人听不明白今天早上播出的就此的分析探讨，说我很过分。
我方敏的回应：请回答我的三个问题来进行你们的评论：
1）：在陶光耀的老婆已经强调担心我会勾引陶光耀甚至武力强奸了陶光耀的情况下，为何必须和陶光耀本人保持联络？
2）：在我都还从未听说陶光耀老婆是谁就已经面对如此敌意的情况下，为何必须由陶光耀的老婆和做我朋友和我交往到我家里探视？如果你对陶光耀老婆的奶子屁股既没有性要求又没有性需求的情况下，做老婆的又已经在其丈夫公婆全家的支持下言辞强硬的拒绝了你去他们夫妻亲友家里及他们的社交场合里强奸了做丈夫的任何机会的情况下，你会认为陶光耀的老婆有如此需要必须有权利到你家里探视吗？为什么？我为何必须和陶光耀的老婆有任何联系任何交往关系而且必须是只准和陶光耀的老婆一个人交往？
3）：为何中国大陆听不懂陶光耀夫妻双方及陶光耀家人就此所表达的共同立场？
4）：还有，据说做儿女的担心我强奸了他或她的父亲，只能自己出面必须到我家里探视的，我对这些做儿女的也是一样地回答：我对你的父亲从来不曾有过任何性需求或者性要求，对你也是永远不会有任何性需求任何性要求，不会需要你。如果情况严重，我会申请法庭的禁制令，就是不会允许你上门到我这里勾引我！！！！
5：）有人说这根本是在表达永远不会是朋友甚至从此不曾相识的意思和立场，我方敏的态度也是：又有什么了不起的？人情世故确实都是早就已经“时过境迁“，不过谈不上是”物是人非”般的吓死人而已。至于如有牵涉到法律的问题，也就是一切依据法律聘用代表律师处理就可以，也是不需亲自出面不需要有任何交往机会。
总结：) 究竟我是什么意思？我的意思就是，既然一切都不是误会，陶光耀妻子就是如此立场，从现在起，我不曾认识陶光耀，也不需要认识陶光耀的妻子家人亲朋。我的意思就是我从来不曾认识陶光耀这个人，不用向我价绍谁是陶光耀的什么人，因为我根本就不认识陶光耀这个人是谁。就是这个意思。
至今广播剧上高调宣布的也全部都是这个意思，从来没有任何难以理解的中英语言，也从来没有任何被错误理解的逻辑表达。
----2018年12月7日更新）
2：上海医科大学90届药理班的李健泽：我对你从来没有任何性需求也没有任何的性要求，自1999年至今也没有任何联络，你既然已经表明不是朋友的立场，我方敏也没有任何社交或者工作需要和你有任何联络，我方敏在此声明我和上海医科大学90届药理班的李健泽本人及其婚姻家庭没有任何关系。请相信这是真实。
3：1990-91年认识的南京药检所李昌江，相淞华，南京四中初中班主任陈师的儿子以及周洪良父子：
我方敏有钱没钱都和你们没有任何关系，我方敏活着是不会需要让你们支付我方敏的一餐一食，死了也不会需要你们支付我方敏的丧葬费用，更没有任何需要和你们有任何社交或者工作上的交往。我私人确实是没有任何需有你们这些人在我生活中存在的原因，也就是没有任何与你们电话电邮或者见面的需要*。请相信这是真实。（*没有办法，不写这句就有人吆喝“一辈子不见你”好像是我有需要不见他们不行）。
----2018年12月6日。
听说我爸爸一直很气愤我为什么只肯按照我父亲的居民户籍所在地的当地标准给与一份等同于我父亲在中国科学院的退休金作为他的零花钱，他如果在中国生活，我还宣称因为中国科学院已经支付了我就不给了。要知道，我父亲一分钱都没拿到，我爷爷们包括他父亲都是把钱直接给我了。据说我父亲走到哪，都是为此安排而红着眼睛一脸强忍的心酸。他的这份委屈还被广而告之以说明我方敏是如何的不肖。
我的解释：其实很简单，因为这一安排，我父亲走到哪，所有需要按照我所要求的标准支付我父亲这一份生活费用的人就统统都知道了，我父亲从来不是一个已经退休的无用无为老人，他是一个被女儿尊敬着的老夫子，中国国家科学院退了休的天文学家。我的这个解释就在2004年7月1日的会议记录里，也赢得了当时在场所有相关人员的100%真心支持。
----2018年12月6日。
听说了一些亲戚对我只照顾我自己父母感觉很心寒。
我的解释：现在你们听说了苏家隆王博真一家在领养他们自己的孩子后与我们家的矛盾，你们就不难想象我已经是训练有素了：没兴趣抢夺你们对你们自己孩子的爱。我有我自己的父母，我只会表达我作为一个亲戚珍惜你们对我的亲戚情，不会混淆我只是一个亲戚立场，也不会混淆血缘关系和亲戚情分的巨大区别。苏家隆2000年去世时，我还为失去他难受，2006年我母亲”去世“之后他们家对我母亲去世的态度，让我从那时起对他们家的任何事情都是不会在乎了。
你们听听：苏家隆王博真是1982年左右领养的王淑秋，我从1982-1983年起就一年只去他们家几次，到现在他们家亲戚甚至是朋友（周洪良一家）都还在四处号称我想抢他们家的东西。我也听说了他们家自1965-1966年就一直和上海我爷爷以前的一个丁姓私人助理一家保持有联络。
----2018年12月6日。
12-05-2018 I graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a BS degree, both were never revoked (我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效)
Heard about this morning's broadcasting about education and anger why I am even eligible to apply graduate study. 听说了今天早上所播出的有关教育及有关我凭什么可以申请研究生院的愤怒？
The anger is because it was announced already Min Fang was not college graduated with a diploma. (听说了有关我根本不是什么本科毕业的愤怒。)
Min Fang's response: This is an untrue statement. (方敏的回应：这根本是错误言论。)
I, Min Fang, graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a Bachelor of Science degree, both were never revoked, this is already confirmed by Shanghai Medical University (AKA Fudan University Shanghai Medical College) in the same radio program's broadcasting on Dec. 1st of 2018.
我方敏是上海医科大学（现名复旦大学上海医学院）毕业的本科生，我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效，听说复旦大学已经在2018年12月1日出面证实这是事实。
----Dec 5th, 2018
How can the public in China have this anger? （为什么中国人民会对此有如此愤怒？）
Min Fang's response: It may not be intentionally caused by a radio program's episode regarding how I write my college graduation's final project. It was intentionally rumored that my college diploma was even revoked because of that public broadcasting. (方敏的回应：是因为广播剧制作的2007年7月的一集播出内容，节目制作可能不是有意但播出的效果似乎是在说我大学毕业论文是抄袭。播出后有一些恶意的谣言甚至说我的毕业文凭和学士证书都因为广播剧的公开事件而取消了。）
That 2007 Medical College's graduation project episode is a most hilarious episode to college professors and research personnel who are familiar with scholar paper writing, all the comments and materials were organized and presented so very funny to scholar-paper-writing community insiders, but somehow not understandable at all to the generic public, which caused the widespread rumor that my college diploma was revoked because of being a copycat in the graduation project papers.（那个2007年播出的有关我上海医科大学毕业论文的一集对所有大学老师及研究生或研究人员等等所有熟悉研究论文研究报告写作的人来说都是能够让他们笑得半死的一集，所有的评论及播出材料的编辑剪辑都是以所有写学术论文的这群人的“圈内人的笑话”所呈现，但好像没被社会大众所听懂，所以造成流言四起，甚至说是我的大学毕业文凭也因为抄袭被公开而因此取消。）
Let me try to explain a bit. My joke was all about how an undergraduate student doesn't know the reason for citing and how to cite.（我来试着解释解释。我当时的笑话就是有关一个本科生如何就是不明白为什么毕业论文需要有文献索引。）
First, let's see the definition for a citation(文献索引的定义）:
"A citation is a reference to a published or unpublished source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of discussion at the spot where the citation appears."(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation)（文献索引是指在自己的学术文章中采用引述他人部分原文或者引用他人学术观点方式引用他人已发表或未发表的作品，并在自己学术文章后面附上他人文献名录的一种方式，目的是为了认可别人学术观点及文章对自己所探讨观点的贡献。）
Second, let's see the definition for a copycat: (抄袭的定义）
"someone who has few ideas of their own and does or says exactly the same as someone else:"
(https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/copycat) （抄袭的定义是指没有自己观点而是使用或模仿他人观点当作自己观点署名。）
Third: Let's see the standard requirements for a scholar paper: （对于学术文章的写作要求通则)
In the U.S, a typical scholar paper requirement for a graduate student:（美国对一个研究生的典型写作要求：）
1: Briefly summarize the philosophy..（简述原理。。）
2: Outline how this philosophy supports the values articulated by....（简述原理对你所探讨观点的适用性。。）
3: What challenges do you expect...in maintaining this philosophy?（原理是否有使用局限？）
4: What would you suggest....?（你的观点？）
Support your statements with evidence from the required studies and your research. Cite and reference your sources in APA style.（请参考本课教学内容及你自己的研究来阐述，请用APA规范来引述及引用。）
中文：
一、本科生毕业论文主要内容（所列出的是对于索引的全部要求）:(typical requirements for undergraduate graduation project paper regarding references and citing，listed is all that related citing):
...
6. 参考文献。期刊内容包括：作者 题名，刊名，年，卷(期)：起始页码-结束页码。著作内容包括：作者、编者，文献题名，出版社，出版年份，起止页码。（standard formatting for reference:...)
....
三、毕业论文份量要求：毕业论文字数一般不少于1.5万字或相当信息量。外文文献阅读量的具体要求，由指导教师量化。(The size of the paper: less than 15,000 words, referencing requirement is per professor. )
(http://me.fudan.edu.cn/instruct/bachelor/lwsxgf.htm)
Let's see the undergraduate student's confusion regarding referencing and citing for the graduation project paper（看一下对于索引和引述引用的困扰）:
Well, the question is why need all these references? Only the article list with author's name or what else? Why I need to cite and how much I can cite in my papers? How long that list would be needed to write my graduation final project paper? （有关的疑问：需要这些文献索引干嘛？就是一个索引名录有每个作者及文献名字就可以吗？我要引述些什么呀？我可以原文引述多少个字还是多少段字？我这个毕业论文的引用文献目录需要多长才可以？
.....
That episode was all about jokes regarding all these confusions as an undergraduate student did not why citing is needed. It never implying me being a copycat.（那一集就是关于一个本科毕业生撰写毕业论文时对文献索引的所有这些不明白而造成的笑话。从来不是影射我抄袭）
12-01-2018 What is citing (什么是引经论典）
I, Min Fang, graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a Bachelor of Science degree, both were never revoked.
我方敏是上海医科大学（现复旦大学上海医学院）毕业的本科生，我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效，
----Dec 5th, 2018
12-04-2018 I am the proven investor already 以及有关我妈妈的说法
I am still tolerated to be the French Financier of the British East India company, the one with the troops.
Supporting Evidence:
1: My inheriting experience on June 30th of 2004 has been real and lawful.
2: I am provided for already by this British East India Company's French Financier's American company according to July 1st of 2004's decision.
3: Even though the Trust-Registry is not open to the public, there are no academic level judicial arguments if the providing-payment from this American company is lawful, which is the reason the providing-payment is proven already my lawful money.
4: Even though the Trust-Registry is not open to the public, there are no academic level judicial arguments if I am eligible to pay investor-tax for the providing-payment from this American company, which is the reason I am the proven already investor of this American company.
BIG BIG THANKS to all my attorneys.
----Dec 4th, 2018
Heard about this morning's broadcasting.
Heard this morning's if husbandas-in-laws is appropriate were OKed by both husbands.
My gosh: No wonder both sisters have the fantasy that I would so stuck on to want to be their friend no matter how harmful they pose themselves to me, it is because they are so wanted by each other's husband.
Question 1: How this related to me when none of their husbands got anything to do with me?
They were the family on the radio almost a year ago who did their own family chat-discussion with their birth parents if I could possibly have a child or children, which they illusioned so successfully completely ruled out any opportunity if I dare to have biological children of my own. Today, it is their try to rule me out if I dare to claim to have money. All because it is such a harmony family to have husbandas-in-laws for both sisters.
Question 2: How this related to me when none of their husbands got anything to do with me?
Too bad,
So, I say this type of their own harmony is not what I value for what a friend means to me,
Too bad,
So, I say here that disliking is obviously mutual.
----Dec 4th, 2018
Heard some sayings about my mother（中文附后）.
Saying 1: My mother never wanted me, I am how she got stuck with my father.
My answer:
Why would that be a problem to me when I knew for certain I am her most wanted after birth?
Why would that be a problem to my father when all he had tried were to lure her in?
Saying 2: She refuses to share my father with me, my father should be all hers 100%.
My answer:
Why would that be a problem to me after I already learned from my growing-up that she is the reason I can demand my father.
Why would that be a problem to my father after all these years self-proving to everybody so?
Saying 3: My mother has to stay away from me because she knows I may not respect what she has promised.
My answer:
Why would that be a problem to me after I already knew that is who my mother is, I will take care of the matter.
Why would that be a problem to my father after he has been dealing with this sort of all his life?
A note:
My mother has been an easy-promising person, I can certainly imagine how she values those who helped her in our difficult times. I value those who truly helped her as well.
----Dec 4th, 2018
听到了一些有关我妈妈的说法：
说法1：我妈妈坦诚她从来就没想要过我是真实，我只是她被我爸爸彻底缠上了的原因。
我已经很确定我一生下来就成了我妈妈最想要的一个，我哪里会介意我妈妈的坦诚？
我爸爸所做的一切努力就是要永远缠着我妈妈，我爸爸哪里会介意我妈妈的坦诚？
说法2：我妈妈表态不愿意和我分享我爸爸，我爸爸应该100%只属于我妈妈一个人。
成长过程，我已经学到了我妈妈才是我可以向我爸爸做要求的原因，我哪里会介意我妈妈的表态？
结婚以后，我爸爸所做的一切就是在向所有人证明一直就是如此，我爸爸哪里会介意我妈妈的表态？
说法3： 我妈妈没法见我，就因她很清楚我可能很不喜欢她到处许愿的性格。
从小到大，我妈妈一直就是如此确实烦人，我哪里会介意也就是好好处理了。
相濡以沫，我爸爸每天就是直面今天又答应了什么，我爸爸哪里还会介意也就是经验充沛了。
小小便签：
我妈妈一直是个很喜欢答应的人，我也能够想象她是如何珍惜那些在我们家身处困境时帮助过她的人，我也很珍惜那些真正帮助过她的人。我爸爸也是一定如此。
----Dec 4th, 2018
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站，你要么在东北大学里，要么不知该往哪走，要么你走走就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
我的电邮地址：SomebodyInMA@gmail.com, somebodyInBoston@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
My other blog -- Chronicle Note(我的另一个博客）
02-26-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （16）-- 南师大附中，广播剧矛盾，及唐太宗李世民的继承人
Heard the anger that I have cash money with me but refuse to pay what I should and live comfortably.
My answer: I have been helped by laws to have a compromised thrift but not miserable living. I have been in a legal situation that I can't receive my lawful incomes is the reason I don't have a lot of money. Paying bills have been huge spending that can make my life very miserable.
----Feb. 26th, 2019
听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。”
我的回应是：这是误会。
首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。
还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍：
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民和东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人，而很多不熟悉没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。
如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。
----2019年2月26日，2019年2月27日更新。
还有，有关谁才是唐太宗李世民继承人一事，
我的说法：其实，究竟谁是继承人应该是按照唐太宗李世民自己定下或认可的家族继承规则而言，如有变更，也必须是由按照唐太宗李世民自己认可的继承规则而继承的人所更改的才是有效更改。按照唐太宗李世民自己所认可的家族继承规则，我父亲方文海和我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。
我们家在唐朝历史上有一些皇帝不是我方敏的爷爷而是我爷爷的兄弟叔侄等，他们的后裔继承人应该说是他们自己这个皇帝爷爷的继承人，而不应该说他们自己是唐太宗李世明的继承人。他们自己的这个皇帝爷爷其实是他们这一支的起家立户爷爷。
----2019年2月26日
02-24-2019 What possibly "I am surrounded by the same school graduated" means?
Heard the anger that I have cash money with me but refuse to pay what I should and live comfortably.
My answer: I have been helped by laws to have a compromised thrift but not miserable living. I have been in a legal situation that I can't receive my lawful incomes is the reason I don't have a lot of money. Paying bills have been huge spending that can make my life very miserable.
----Feb. 26th, 2019
听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。”
我的回应是：这是误会。
首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。
还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍：
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民和东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人，而很多不熟悉
如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。
----2019年2月26日，2019年2月27日更新。
还有，有关谁才是唐太宗李世民继承人一事，
我的说法：其实，究竟谁是继承人应该是按照唐太宗李世民自己定下或认可的家族继承规则而言，如有变更，也必须是由按照唐太宗李世民自己认可的继承规则而继承的人所更改的才是有效更改。按照唐太宗李世民自己所认可的家族继承规则，我父亲方文海和我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。
我们家在唐朝历史上有一些皇帝不是我方敏的爷爷而是我爷爷的兄弟叔侄等，他们的后裔继承人应该说是他们自己这个皇帝爷爷的继承人，而不应该说他们自己是唐太宗李世明的继承人。他们自己的这个皇帝爷爷其实是他们这一支的起家立户爷爷。
----2019年2月26日
02-24-2019 What possibly "I am surrounded by the same school graduated" means?
“我的一切都被同一个学校毕业的给包围了“究竟可能会是什么意思啊?
It may mean they are illegally privileged to block any financial payment to me.
The saying I heard is "This blocking effort is all about laws, not about if friendly or not."
If so, I need to ask the following questions:
1: Which part of the process of transmitting money payment to me is unlawful?
2: Is my name, or my SSN(ID), or my contact address unlawful?
If all information about me which include my name, my SSN(ID), my legal status and my contact address are all lawfully correct, why it is forbidden to transmit money into my name related any financial account?
3: If it is not the transmitting money into my name account is illegal but the money itself, I must ask the question how you can verify if that is lawful nor not money being transferred to me?
Being a non-financial nor legal department employed personnel, how do you have the means to verify the lawfulness of the money being transmitted to my name account?
4: If you don't have the money lawfulness-verification capability, how do you have such privileged power to delete and/or change the money's lawful transmitting purpose to change money's lawful ownership?
5: If this is all about precaution in blocking payment to me because you thought it is never my money.
I have to ask according to exact what law this precaution, which includes delete payment and/or transfer out (not reject) money, can be authorized as lawful action? And why a regular employee can't do such a job but need specially recruit the same school graduated?
It is all about laws which precisely is the reason I called law enforcement's help.
It is imaginable how it has been in Boston where I am a resident of when all have such power to smear about me waiting for my living expenses payments. It may have started- off amicably, but now it is all so-despised, disgusted, and hate, nothing else.
I, Min Fang, refuse to be a victim of such.
It is imaginable how it has been in Boston where I am a resident of when all have such power to smear about me waiting for my living expenses payments. It may have started- off amicably, but now it is all so-despised, disgusted, and hate, nothing else.
I, Min Fang, refuse to be a victim of such.
----Feb. 24th, 2019
“我的一切都被同一个学校毕业的给包围了“究竟可能会是什么意思啊?
这有可能意味着他们可以非法阻隔不让我收到任何财务给付。我听说的态度是：“这一切努力都是关于法律，不是什么友善不友善的事“
如果如此，我就要问以下的问题：
2：是否我的名字，我的社会安全号码（身份证号码），我在美国的居民法律身份，或者我的联络地址电话，有哪一个是牵涉了非法？
如果我的姓名，社会安全号码，在美居民身份及所有联络地址信息都是合法，为何支付钱款给我是被你们所禁止的？
3：如果不是因为支付款项给我这个行为本身是非法行为，而是怀疑所支付的钱款是否合法，
那么我必须问一下，作为一个既非财务部门又非法律部门的普通工作人员，你又有什么方式和能力可以核实你所怀疑的支付给我的钱款是否合法？
4：如果你没有任何核实所支付钱款是否合法的能力和方式，你如何会有权力为了改变该支付钱款的法律所有权就直接删除甚至转出所支付的钱款？
4：如果你没有任何核实所支付钱款是否合法的能力和方式，你如何会有权力为了改变该支付钱款的法律所有权就直接删除甚至转出所支付的钱款？
5：如果所有这些小心防范行为是因为你怀疑所支付钱款从来不是我的钱，
我就必须问你，究竟是根据那一条具体的法律条款，所有这些小心防范包括删除付款甚至转出钱款是可以被认为是合法的？如果这种小心防范行为合法，那为什么普通的一般雇员不可以执行这份工作而必须特别招募“同一个学校毕业的？
所有这一切都确实是关于法律的，是我报警求助从未犹豫的确切原因。
可以想象我在麻州波士顿是什么样的一个处境，每一个都是如此的大权在握笑看我苦苦等着我的生活费用给付以及我失踪父母的消息。刚开始可能还算心态平和，现在我感受到的就只有鄙视，厌恶和仇恨。
我方敏拒绝成为这类行为的受害者。
----2019年2月24日。
可以想象我在麻州波士顿是什么样的一个处境，每一个都是如此的大权在握笑看我苦苦等着我的生活费用给付以及我失踪父母的消息。刚开始可能还算心态平和，现在我感受到的就只有鄙视，厌恶和仇恨。
我方敏拒绝成为这类行为的受害者。
----2019年2月24日。
02-23-2019 2-08-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （15）-- 南师大附中，高考，和大学时的学习能力
我是1982年入读，1985年从南师大附中高中部毕业的。高中时是高一上学期（1982年的九月）拍电影说我漂亮，因为拍摄时间都是学校上课时间，所以就只有85届2班看到过。我在整个高中就读期间的样子，就是我在1989年5月的全国高校会议时的形象，很简单，很中性，很学生。
我高一入学时，成绩都是一般在60-70分左右，高一时上课都是一个人坐最后一排，和女生交往有限，和男生没有任何言语接触。高一下学期开始有了女同桌，才开始和同班的女生有了交往。上课除了聊天就是望着窗外神游，所以高中好像是被老师换了几个同桌到高三时才有了稳定座位。
对高考学习的建议，是在我高二下学期1984年五月份左右的的时候，我记得我那天是穿着薄外套和衬衫。我对高考的建议，就是广播剧上所播出的，我当时坚持自己会在高三开始实施自己的复习计划，就是因为我作为初中靠高中时自己就已经实践过了，很有效，我的初中就读经历和高中差不过，初三成绩的稳步急速上升是我当年可以考上省重点高中的南师大附中高中部的原因。
最近才听说，南师大附中很多的校友都没听懂广播剧所播出的我对高考复习的建议，认为那是瞎掰是弄了个广播剧胡说八道想挣钱而已，我本人可以在1985年以85届2班全班女生高考成绩第一名毕业，南师大附中的很多校友认为不是我撞了大运而已就是可能有作弊，是今天南师大附中很多校友认为我没有可能有任何学术研究上的任何成就的原因，认为我方敏是有史以来最大的假冒伪造的原因。
其实当年我作为高中二年级的学生，提出的建议就是因为当年的我已经认识到了科学是严谨的，这严谨也反映在了科学原理及科学定义的语言陈述上。科学原理和定义，都在经历了无数次的论证和试验而成为理论，都有其严格的使用前提，适用范围，和准确的功能。一旦意识到这点，用字典所定义的各个名词来理解定义，就会对高中的数理化所涉及的各项远离定义的使用前提，适用范围及具体功能有很清晰的了解。但作为学习理解能力有限的中学学生，这份清晰了解就只有在高二复习考试过后，也就是在初步掌握了高中两年所学内容之后，回头看才能有的一份认知。因为不想失去高二暑假的快乐时光，所以我当时强调我自己会从高三9月份开学时开始进行这类复习，时间上应该可以正好赶上7月份的高考，我初三考高中时就已经有经验了。我高三整个复习高考都很轻松，从不需要熬夜，有时甚至还可以看看电视。
考试所测试的内容也都是对于数理化定义和原理的认知和理解，一旦清晰理解这些数理化的原理定义的使用前提，适用范围和准确功能，不管是试图混淆的选择题，或者是只有正确选择恰档的使用定义原理之后才能演绎推理的应用问答题，都是可以清楚很多而因此可以做出正确答案。这是我在14，15岁初三时就已经掌握并且经过实践过的学习能力和方法。
我的高中第三年和初中第三年的成绩进步是一样的稳步上升直至联考。我1982年的高中联考考上南师大附中高中部，及1985年的大学联考考上中国医药界数一数二的上海第一医学院就读药理专业，都是凭实际能力考试的结果，从来不是什么撞了大运也不是什么作弊而有。
我念大学的时候，理解能力认知事物的能力也已经强了很多，老师上课讲的，基本上当时就已经全部能听懂了，所以虽然很少在课后复习，到考试的时候上课所学的内容也常常忘了很多，但基本原理和系统知识都学会了。我能一个人自学经济学教授厉以宁的那本《宏观经济学》，凭的也就是这份学习，认知和理解的能力。
据说南京市药检所的周自新是逢人就说我”嘻大遛岗“的那一种，可以说是他本人对我年轻时的印象，据说也是那个1976年和我父亲为买裙子吵架的北京天文台那家的亲生女儿以中国共青团中央的名义在89年高校会议以后从北京到处联系各地，到处造谣的结果。
南师大附中校友中，可能有很多当年没有考上心仪大学的校友，似乎始终没有放弃心中那一份当年的纠结，老是一副”凭什么是你？你不过就是当年高考撞了大运而已“的态度，是我在高中毕业已经三十四年之后的今天认为实在有点很烦人的原因。据说在波士顿的华裔社区，就是这些人以政府雇员的身份在到处宣扬对我方敏的鄙视和仇恨。
----2019年2月23日。
02-22- 2019 The reason for an attending phenomenon on July 1st of 2004 (2004年7月1日那天为何那么多的政府参与电讯会议？）
Heard a lot confused, if it was my entrusting related meeting, why so many public officials were presented on July 1st of 2004's teleconference?
My answer: That was because it was the day right after June 30th's revolutionary talk about the invention of smartphones, also it was also the mid-term election time when economic development was very important topics to the running Republic party. A lot of conversations were about international economic development as well might be the reasons for worldwide governments' participation.
I was impressed on June 30th already right after finishing smartphones' related conversation, tons of people, who may have been informed by their associated, had "phoned me" asking if there are other investments opportunities because the smartphone-related were all overcrowded already. So many people feel so bad so they eagerly helped out by asking if there can be more ideas to create more investment opportunities? The next day which was July 1st, one can really use "people mountain people sea" to describe the teleconference attending phenomenon.
I got a lot of luck that day as well that I earned a lot of intellectual rewards from all those economic development related conversations. If some say that I should return the favor of opportunity granting from those public officials, I say the huge tax-incomes and job opportunities created for economic development have been all they have been working hard for, which should have been what drive them to serve the public as well.
It has been rumored in Chinese communities abroad that 1989's Student movement related teleconference was the reason I could have such opportunity to be such privileged by the U.S. government, this blog article is the clarification of such rumors. The entire teleconference on July 1st of 2004 was all economic-centric and related.
----Feb 22nd, 2019
听说华人社区及中国大陆很多人都很奇怪如果只是我的信托相关会议，为何2004年7月1日有那么多的各国政府官员参与？
我的回答：那是因为2004年6月30日那天有关智能手机的一场谈话对美国经济可能发生的正面影响所引发的，而且当时正在进行的美国总统中期选举可能是美国当时执政的共和党踊跃参与及组织各种相关会议的原因。有些话题因为国际层面的经济发展，可能是很多其他国家的政府也踊跃参与的原因。
我本人影响最深刻的就是6月30日智能手机谈话一结束，相关各方人员都在准备如何进行这场通讯革命的时候，估计大量的各方投资人就都被亲朋通知参与会议，我自己一下就被各方“致电查询”是否还有投资机会？智能手机的投资机会已经满额了。没有办法，当时是各方人士都在积极安抚这些致电查询人士，都在帮忙想办法看还有什么是可以创造一些投资机会的。第二天就是2004年7月1日那天，更是可以用“浩浩荡荡”来形容参与会议人员。
我占很大便宜了，因为很多涉及地区及行业经济发展的相关话题，我有机会拿了很多的智慧专利收入。有人会说我是否应该考虑回馈给创造这机会的那些从政人员？我说所创造的大量工作机会及高额税收就已经是他们最想要的了，这应该也是他们作为从政人员致力于发展经济的一个重要动力。
有很多国内人员听说1989年的全国高校会议是我在美国受到美国政府如此高规格待遇的原因，根本纯属误传。当时整个会议都是关于经济发展，以及由经济发展所延伸的。
----2019年2月22日。
Heard tons of rumor that it is understood as my own willingness to watch others take over my money.
My answer: This has been ridiculous rumors the entire time.
This rumor started since July 1st of 2004. It was a conversation that I was asked what else I would like to spend on my money, I said I am a business person that believe in making customers favorable products as long as it is a fair competition that regulated by laws, and I came from China that I enjoyed the United States lawful governing very much that I would be willing to encourage to make it even better.
I heard rumors that my complaints about I can't receive intellectual reward payment and living expenses payments are all related to the hypothesis that "this is a distribution channel market that refusal of distributing is the power" that no one can do anything about, especially those payments from Trusts are all strictly to be through fixed distributing channels. And any financial loss should be understood as my own willingness to be sacrificed to improve related laws, which is an untrue statement. Plus, any such things are possibly violating criminal laws.
I was willing to encourage to improve laws, but it does not mean to encourage to take advantage of the weakness of laws which normally are understood as "should be convicted as guilty if intended to take advantage of".
So, I refuse to be a victim. And I know I have been protected by laws already.
----Feb, 20th, 2019, updated on Feb 22nd, 2019
02-19-2019 Who owns Ingonyama entitlement?
I own the Ingonyama entitlement from the legendary of 1000 years long
Heard the confusion if I am an Ingonyama for real? The confusion is because of an African lady, currently live in the United States as well) has been the one handsomely provided for by the Ingonyama Fund since 2001 or 2007.
I also heard she is the same African lady that had stated the difference between her and me in 2017 that she came from the "Ingonyama" King of 500 years ago and the Ingonyama title has been a legendary was the reason of her grandfather's inauguration, and I, the heir female palm, inherited the Ingonyama legendary title in 2004 as part of the Trust-Inheriting from my birth Ancient Chinese Imperial family..
I am the female palm because I carry family heir birthmark on both of my palms, and I am the only heir girl since, maybe, 2500 years ago is the reason I received a lot of gifts from my Emperor grandfathers who normally gift their favorite people with money, entitlement, and beauty. Being their heir girl, my Emperor grandfathers had each entitled me an Emperor title, not their own in-use title which should be my next generation grandfather, as well as their heir sons, to inherit, but an equivalent new entitlement as a gift to state I am their heir girl. This is how I got my Ingonyama entitlement.
I have been provided for the two Trusts set up by Ingonyama heir son "Simba" and "Simba's son" which I call my fourth and fifth year's providing as their heir "Female Palm" girl with entitlement from each as well which I will announce once I heard of them.
I have not received this Ingonyama entitled grandfather's providing is the confusion of Ingonyama Fund, but I am the beneficiary person of a Trust who has limited knowledge on all these financial historical matters. All I know is I inherited an ancient Trust from an ancient Emperor grandfather who gifted me with money and Ingonyama entitlement, and I heard both Simba's Trust and Simba's son's Trusts I have been provided-for are been verified for over 600 years old according to the commercial registration laws. I think my entrusting attorneys will work on clarify further confusions if there is any.
----Feb. 19th, 2019
02-18-2019 Whose $400Million a year? How to know?
Heard about this confusion of "who's paying for this $400Million a year".
1: How any American rich can be so confused if they are in the same American business society and running some American business as well?
My answer: My Trusts' investment as a Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) who came to America with their investors' own government-convoys and armed with Musketeers as pioneers at America's colonial time which was about 400 years ago. That is the reason why some in-confusing companies were initially registered with their investor companies' own governments' convoys, till the 1776's registration to the United States' government.
Because of the difference in each's starting-up years, some of my Trusts' investments have complete different associated supplying and financing associates that completely not associated with those confused rich men's family wealth's investments. The difference is the same as Military hospital groups, the commercial hospital chains, and some international goodwill hospital groups, all are completely not associated with each other even running in the same local areas.
----Feb. 18th, 2019
2: The real $400Million recipient is a Hispanic female whose middle name is "Min", and the last name is "Fone".
My answer:
I have no idea how the payment-instruction letter has used Fone as the last name unless that is a typo which can be easily verified. And I don't know if this is the same $400Million payment that I mentioned as yearly providing on my web blog.
Those five Trusts I have inherited were all set up before I was born so that all used my family nickname "Female Palms" with clear specification of who this girl should be. I used "Min Fang" as my name since July 1967 which was shortly after my birth. $400Million payment a year for the past five years from my inherited Trusts are all identity-sensitive, not the last name's spelling-sensitive.
----Feb. 18th, 2019
3: How to verify if this is some rich men's money that was announced so loudly never intend to give me?
My answer: Very easily: The paying company's internal "stock certificate registration record" and government commerce department's commercial company registration record.
Steps:
- From the $400Million's payment check's instructional legal payment letter, check the paying investor's information, or from one's own stock certificate to check if money is from this person's own dividend account.
- From the government's commercial company registration records to check the investor company's ownership if the paying investor is a company instead of an individual, and so on so forth, till clarified.
----Feb. 18th, 2019
My answer: My inheriting experience has been real and it is impossible for me to expect money from any American rich men.
The problem I have with some confused rich American men is: Some insist that it is impossible that I have my own money trust-inherited from my birth Chinese grandfathers.
Some even insist on to tell around that I could spend their money by not asking them, not contacting them, not telling anyone to collect money from them, and not has any money on me or being expected that should be from their own bank accounts.
----Feb. 18th, 2019
02-12-2019 How to know if I am a say-er or a do-er in research?
Heard about arguments how any project-outsider can evaluate if my achievement is authentic? I also have this wondering why academic evaluation need to be conducted by some political grassroots movement? What should be the expectation for the general public's participation in any scientific academic level evaluation? even if this is money sensitive evaluation for the intellectual incomes?
So, I have formed this question for everybody: Why the General Public should be expected to have the evaluation power without professional knowledge and professional experiences?
----Feb. 12th, 2019
Also, I heard a lot of people who visited my MBA blog has some doubts about me.
1: If I exaggerated as a say-er for who I am but not really a doer leader at all?
My response: That post is the resume of how I assess myself if I am eligible to be its leader, the if-doer assessment is actually the organization assessment which is my MBA capstone project that I am learning to do for the same organization, which is to assess the organization for its overall goodness and challenges to decide if I should propose myself as its doer leader.
2: How could I come up such leadership PPT based on those five or six leadership articles?
My response: In research, once a project's frame is shaping up nicely by the research, another important part is to fill in missing links for evidence support and theoretical relate, which is similar to smoothness required between paragraphs in articulation or literature. So, when it is a resume type of leadership representation, more supporting evidence is needed to integrate the entire PPT as one piece of a leader for a specific organization. That PPT is how I filled in missing links of evidence support and theoretical relates to make it an assessment of myself for the leadership eligibility of this specific organization. I like its PPT format a lot because it focuses on research links for evidence support and theoretical relates, but less stressful in making it literature smooth as well, which is more ideally for my immigrant technology background.
3: What MBA concentration I enrolled in that highlights leadership capability?
My response:
From my MBA graduation reflective essay: "When I applied for MBA education, I was interviewed about why I want to have an MBA and what will be my concentration, I said I want to know how I can start my own business, I want to learn where to start if I walk into a for-rent space. The concentration program I enrolled in isGeneral Administration（常务管理）".
After this leadership course MBA513 and the current capstone course I am learning, which need to use all that I have learned in MBA education to conduct assessment for myself and for the organization, "I have the confidence that I have learned knowledge that enables me to lead an organization to face its challenges, or to start a small own business(reflective essay)".
4: Do I realize MBA educated leadership is a calculating & analyzing job as well, not just an articulating job?
My response: Well, I have a Master degree and the hands-on experiences as a good computer programmer which is a doer profession based on computation, a science of calculation and measurement, that I don't think I need to prove that I can also do mathematics financially. My understanding of mathetics in finance is that I need to learn those formulas' theory background and applicable range to know how to use formulas in financial analyzing, which we have some homework assignment for learning and practicing purpose already. But, I have no problem to post a very simple mathematic financial analysis I did in school's MBA573 discussion post. It is investor interesting calculation regarding the required rate of return and stock purchase return:
----------------posted on Sept 9, 2018, on school's discussion blackboard ------------------
The CAPM formula for Rate of required return is:
Rate of required return Rr=Rf + [Beta *(RM - Rf )] ;
Rate of required return Rr=Rf + [Beta *(RM - Rf )] ;
The formula of Rate of total return is: Rate of total return Rt = (Ct + Pt+1 - Pt )/Pt;
In deciding dividend, the best decision is Rr <= Rt;;
Rf + [Beta *(RM - Rf )] <= (Ct + Pt+1 - Pt )/Pt ;
Rf + [Beta *(RM - Rf )] <= (Ct /Pt ) + ( Pt+1 /Pt ) - 1 ;
If Pt+1 >= Pt is intended, then( Pt+1 / Pt ) - 1>0;
Then, Rf + [Beta *(RM - Rf )] < Ct / Pt;
then Rf + [Beta *(RM - Rf )] < Ct / Pt+1;
Also,
If an increase in both the total rate of return and stock price is the purpose,
then, Rf + [Beta *(RM - Rf )] < Ct / Pt+1 ; (from above)
then, Rate of required return < Yearly dividend per share/Pt+1;
then, Cost of Capital < Yearly dividend per share/Pt+1;
then, Cost of Capital < Net profit per share /Pt +1 – Retained earnings per share/Pt +1;
then, Retained earnings per share/Pt +1 < Net profit per share /Pt +1 – Cost of Capital;
then, Retained earnings per share <Net Profit per share -Cost of Capital * Pt+1;
Conclusion:
1: When (Yearly dividend per share/ Intended Stock price Pt+1 ) > rate of required return Rr, the dividend level is good for both the stock price and Total rate of return.
2: To have an increase in both stock price and rate of total return, Retained earnings per share need to be smaller than the difference between net profit per share and Cost of capital * Intended Stock price Pt+1.
-----------------------------------------The End -------------------------------------------------
----Feb. 12th, 2019
----Feb. 12th, 2019
02-08-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （14）-- 我不是南师大附中85届2班的同学
听说了难以理解为什么及究竟是什么样的矛盾，举个例子：大学毕业30年之后，你在一个完全陌生的城市有了自己的事业，自己的朋友和专业领域的成就。在你因为专业领域的成就而很骄傲时，却被人误解你在这个城市的朋友及你的专业领域的工作社交圈才是你能够在专业领域成功的原因。而你也因为多年和大学的同一个专业的同班同学们没有联络，你也没有将这误会放在心上。结果，你听说你的一个大学同班同学为了自己事业也能成功，就派出了他的妹妹团，只要听说是你的朋友熟人工作关系，他的一个妹妹就会是其挚爱心仪，他也很自信他自己有足够多的妹妹，让你走的哪里都有他的一个花巨资整容过的性感妹妹坐在你同事朋友工作关系的大腿上，就为了知道你是如何成功的，就不信没有可能不取代你，就不信没有可能不将你赶出你自己的生活工作的圈子，你会如何理解这些动作？这和你是否满意你自己的婚恋私人生活相关吗？如果你听说是你所毕业的这个大学这一年这专业的全班参与甚至全届参与，甚至这个大学的历届校友都有参与，你会如何理解？
在国外，虽然很多人（包括政府机关执法人员及华人）都难以相信我有拿到丰厚智慧专利的能力成就，但也都知道都是在公开场合众人亲眼看见我自己创造，包括我在电脑方面的成就，也都是全程每分每秒都在公司办公室在所有同事面前所成就的。真是没什么好解释的。
其实，要解释也就是如此了：1）我从初中高中开始，老师就普遍都知道我的学习方法很好，也就是研究中所需的探索总结研究命题的能力很强；2）也是从初中高中开始，老师也都知道我的举一反三的能力很强，想问题也很周到，这就是研究中从事物发展中的取得理论联想启发的能力很强；3）很多认识我的人也都知道我对事物很敏锐很敏感，我的眼睛视力不好但很尖，这其实就是研究中所需要的观察能力很强。
在从事研究工作所需的基本三要素我都很强的情况下，这还是众所周知我三者都很强的情况下，一旦有研究工作的机遇，有些研究上的成就怎么就是不可能的呢？
现在能和以前的老师们说的，就是从事研究工作是有副作用的：我现在已经不是以前那个灵动的方敏了，你们要是见过我爸爸方文海，你们就可以想象我现在是什么样子了，据说看人接物一举一动都神似。我是从2004年就已经离开了研究工作岗位，所以我目前还没那么惨，就是还是难以想象这人居然是当年的那个方敏。不知还要多久，才有可能让人感觉我是可以和凡人沟通的。
----2019年2月11日
究竟我和南师大附中85届2班及其他一些人的矛盾究竟是什么？因为我听到的传言让我觉得实在寒心。我听说的是：南师大附中一些人在2004年6月7月的时候因为参加了电话会议，看到了一些名人和我交谈，很愿意走入我的社交圈。我估计，他们点吧点吧他们自己没什么特别的资本，又不甘于自己创造他们自己的社交圈，就设下计谋用集体的力量把一些女人屁股挤入到这个那个我可能会聊得挺开心的恋爱或非恋爱关系的男人腿上，以他们的屁股做为资本就是一定要走入我的社交圈，让我走到哪儿都得给他们的屁股一个面子以知道我自己他妈的其实什么都不是而已。
我方敏本人从小学时期就很独立，基本上都是独来独往，和同学友人之类的交往有限，更从未介入任何友人或同学的私人社交圈，所以难以理解这种企图。我本人更是难得在别人家里留宿，真实就是我在外的非旅馆留宿而没睡在我自己床上的总次数是屈指可数的，而我现在却是一直都需要面对“既使是要砸烂了我婚姻家庭的门才能走进我的家，他们也一定要进入到我的婚姻家庭里，过一份他们就是一定要过的美好日子”的这一份威胁。
我听到的当年国内友人的如今愤怒要求都是：作为朋友同学或者不常往来的亲戚，他们凭什么就是不可以住到我家？他们的老婆凭什么就是不可以长期睡在我的卧室隔壁？他们的老婆就是不乐意在他们探访我期间由我另外安排住宿，他们的老婆就是一定要住在我自己的主要起居住所的我自己的卧室隔壁。我的愤怒就是为什么必须由他们选择我在那里接待他们探访？为什么他们就是必须介入我的私人生活？就此，我一直是在寻求法律的保护，我方敏本人坚决拒绝我方敏的私人生活被如此计算被如此打扰。
我不愿意我自己的社交生活成为这些肮脏想法的受害者，更不愿意我的婚恋生活被污染，所以在这些传言未经澄清为无稽之谈之前，我方敏是南师大附中85届2班毕业的，但我方敏不是这个南师大附中85届2班任何人的同学也不是南师大附中的校友。如果事实真是如传言，我也就过自己日子，和所有这些早已经是过去的人和事没有关系就好了。
----2019年2月8日。
你怎么还在说你有钱？这个那个男人不都已经是别的女人嘴里她自己的男人了吗？
我的回应：所以说啊，实在是烦得不得了唉。都已经一次次的讲了，我的钱不是什么男人的裤裆钱。今天就再多讲如下几句：
男人的钱包，就在男人自己的裤子口袋里；男人自己的裤子口袋，就在男人自己的男性具的两边；所以，当这个男人那个男人都已经在你嘴里了，你就别到处说你居然不知道同一个男人的钱包在哪里，或者说你自己嘴忙着的时候，闲着的的手居然没够得着同一个男人的钱包。
至于说某个女人的这个那个她自己男人家里的爷爷爸爸传下来的钱在哪里，跑来找我质问就更是某名奇妙了。
----2019年2月8日更新
都知道我经常如下回复一些某明奇妙的问题：
1：陌生人对我怒吼：“我是在问你，我自己的钱在哪里？”
我会回答："一定是被你藏在你自己的肛门里了，那里是我唯一能想像被你藏着黄金万两，你自己却忘了翻一下找一下的地方。”
2：女人问我：“我现在就是要问你，我自己男人的钱在哪里？我自己男人家里的钱在哪里？”
我会回答：你自己男人他自己的钱就在你自己的嘴边舌角，你自己男人他自己家里的钱就在你自己男人他自己的家里。
----2019年2月8日。
----2019年2月8日。
你怎么还在说你有钱？这个那个男人不都已经是别的女人嘴里她自己的男人了吗？
我的回应：所以说啊，实在是烦得不得了唉。都已经一次次的讲了，我的钱不是什么男人的裤裆钱。今天就再多讲如下几句：
男人的钱包，就在男人自己的裤子口袋里；男人自己的裤子口袋，就在男人自己的男性具的两边；所以，当这个男人那个男人都已经在你嘴里了，你就别到处说你居然不知道同一个男人的钱包在哪里，或者说你自己嘴忙着的时候，闲着的的手居然没够得着同一个男人的钱包。
至于说某个女人的这个那个她自己男人家里的爷爷爸爸传下来的钱在哪里，跑来找我质问就更是某名奇妙了。
----2019年2月8日更新
都知道我经常如下回复一些某明奇妙的问题：
1：陌生人对我怒吼：“我是在问你，我自己的钱在哪里？”
我会回答："一定是被你藏在你自己的肛门里了，那里是我唯一能想像被你藏着黄金万两，你自己却忘了翻一下找一下的地方。”
2：女人问我：“我现在就是要问你，我自己男人的钱在哪里？我自己男人家里的钱在哪里？”
我会回答：你自己男人他自己的钱就在你自己的嘴边舌角，你自己男人他自己家里的钱就在你自己男人他自己的家里。
----2019年2月8日。
02-05-2019 我的亲朋送礼计划 (15) ---- My online gifting idea -- 《亲朋礼相关的困扰》
About the rumor regarding my undergraduate diploma.
My response: I heard the rumor was sparked by an announcement that the Chinese Education Department decided to revoke my undergraduate diploma on the radio. But I also heard that announcement was made by a Mr. Ding who was never employed by the Chinese Education Department but a son of my grandfather's former private assistant Mr. Ding. Came from Shanghai, he has a job in the affiliated company of the Chinese Education Department in Beijing since 1984.
It has been so ridiculous all this time how it has circled around in Chinese community abroad. The truth is, a graduation diploma can only be evaluated and granted by the academic professor committee assigned by the college, never grantable nor revokable by the Educational Department. An employee from the Education Department would certainly know this.
12-05-2018 I graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a BS degree, both were never revoked (我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效)
----Feb. 5th, 2019
有关我的大学毕业文凭被中国教育部宣布无效的传闻。
我的回应：我听说这个传闻是由广播剧的一次播出所引发的。广播剧在一次播出中宣布中国教育部已经决定取消我的大学毕业文凭是造成流言蜚语的原因。我也听说了在广播剧上宣布的那个人就是我爷爷以前那个上海丁姓私人助理的一个儿子。他从来不是中国教育部的工作人员，他是自1984年到北京后在北京的中国教育部的一个三产公司工作。一直就是觉得在海外华裔社区闹得轩轩洋洋的这种传言实在是莫名其妙的很离谱了。
事实上，一个大学的本科毕业文凭，都是只能由该大学所指定的教授学术评鉴委员会所评估核发的，从来就不是作为中国各高校大学的政府行政管理机构的教育部可以评鉴授予的，也没有可能是由教育部所取消的。所以我就说啊，做宣布的那人要真是中国教育部的工作人员，就应该会很清楚这一点的。
12-05-2018 I graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a BS degree, both were never revoked (我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效)
----2019年2月5日
听说了一些说法，意思是中国政府立场就是说人死了就绝了，是不会有人需要问一句的。
所以，我是一直说啊，中国政府要是一个共和国的人民政府，就没有可能闭着眼睛说瞎话，更不可能说人死了就绝了，不需要法律，不需要职责，更不需要人民，就只要中国的金库钥匙可以拿得到。
----2019年2月5日
为什么有血缘关系就是不可以随便拿我的钱花？为什么任何人都必须我同意才可以花我的钱？
我的回应：首先就是因为我对你们任何人都没有任何法律上的抚养责任义务，就算是一些友善亲戚，而不是一些我方敏及我的父母听也没听说过的血缘关系，你们家的工资奖金存款，我方敏及我的父母也从未分到过一分一毫，也就只是收到过一些你们愿意给的礼物礼金。怎么我方敏自己的工资奖金存款，你们有血缘关系就必须分多少必须拿多少，否则就是不行，就算是要砸了我方敏的家也一定要拿到这份钱？究竟我方敏的哪一分哪一厘的工资奖金存款是拿了你们这些血缘关系的钱？我方敏为什么就应该被你们这些血缘关系如此恐吓威胁？我也已经就我方敏自己的存款（信托继承）做了很多解释了，我方敏也多次表达了我认为就算我的存款是源自某个男人指定给我的裤裆钱，也不是我方敏做为一个女人就因此欠了你们这些血缘关系没被你们自己男人支付给你们他们这些你们自己男人自己咂了你们自己奶头的钱的立场。
我的愤怒就在于我认为你们的要求是基于你们认为我应该死绝了就好，我方敏本人及我的父母我的所爱根本就不需要有钱花也根本就不需要有日子过，更不应该花我方敏自己的钱，所以你们才会觉得我愿意赠送的每年2千万美金的亲朋礼实在是吝啬的离谱，所以你们才会愤怒为什么我方敏居然认为我方敏自己的钱应该由我方敏自己决定怎么花，也就是你们也根本没有任何亲戚情分，所以，我拒绝你们这个根本就是勒索的要求，我也会寻求法律保护。
----2019年2月5日
你怎么还在说你有钱？这个那个男人不都已经是别的女人嘴里她自己的男人了吗？
我的回应：所以说啊，实在是烦得不得了唉。都已经一次次的讲了，我的钱不是什么男人的裤裆钱。今天就再多讲如下几句：
男人的钱包，就在男人自己的裤子口袋里；男人自己的裤子口袋，就在男人自己的男性具的两边；所以，当你说这个男人那个男人的阳具都已经在你嘴里含着了，你就别到处说你居然不知道同一个男人的钱包在哪里，或者说你自己嘴忙着的时候，闲着的的手居然没够得着同一个男人的钱包。
至于说某个女人的这个那个她自己男人家里的爷爷爸爸传下来的钱在哪里，跑来找我质问就更是某名奇妙了。
----2019年2月5日
02-03-2019 Intellectual Income related explanation
1: Ingonyama title is in the local language, but I came from China?
My response: There are two possibilities for how I got this entitlement officially on June 30th of 2004.
1) I received the original entitlement, given by my ancient Emperor grandfather in Chinese, together with my Trust-Inheriting, Ingonyama its translation in the local language, or
2) this is the entitlement of my ancient grandfather's that I inherited together with the my Trust-Inheriting as the direct-beneficiary-heir of the entitled ancient grandfather of mine.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
2: Even if I was a very good computer programmer who learned macroeconomy, how could I be impressed as good at financial risk management?
My response: A common practice in computer programming is error & exceptional handling for programming or run-time situations, the better in programming practices, the less chances a software will behave weirdly in the office or home usage, which means less user-panics for "I didn't do anything, it went dark and I can't bring it up" or "I can't find my files anywhere, I was just trying to check some spellings, where is my file folder now?", etc. All these reasons for possible panic, anxiety, etc. are called financial risks in sciences related to the economy or finance. Of course, it helps a computer programmer to understand risk management if this error &exceptional handling concepts can be borrowed into financial related analyzing, Plus, I was a computer programmer specialized in computer security who was very sensitive about network-hacking.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
3: How can I make so many intellectual incomes by "just a couple of lines" ideas?
My response: Well, it is well-known that nobody believes that I can finish the CDSA-secure data-transfer project and the no-password-login project in less than total 4 years time, and nobody believes I can know so much about computer's operating system to contribute in revolutionary smartphone invention, but I did these two projects, every second and from start to finish, right in the office and in front of everyone in the office, which was verified minute-by-minute during the project-evaluation.
How this related to the question? It means I must have saved a lot of time in wondering for "what's the next hypothesis?" in that research, either because I have been talented on this, or because I may have learned something about it during the research process. And a lot of times, a good hypothesis is the critical reason for a successful project, which may be the reason that those of my "just a couple of lines" ideas have been valuable-ly helpful and appreciate-ly recognized.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
4: A lot asked why the evaluating group can value "less" my intellectual contribution by compensating other research personnel, such as the story of Viagra's clinical research team?
My response: The evaluation is the combined result of the academic value plus the years of service in the research team. My contribution was evaluated "less" because of the lack of service years in the research team.
Also, my contribution was the budget saving to the lab research and early-starting of the clinical research, so my contribution story has the episode that I was not welcomed by the lab-research team but so welcomed by the clinical research team.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
02-01-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （12-A）--- 南师大附中校友的海外名作篇
听说今天早上南京市和江苏省政府对于我父亲方文海就是死了没可能活着的说法。
我的回应：如果江苏省政府和南京市政府不是这种负面立场态度，我父亲方文海作为南京市居民，中国的公民，在2013年的时候就不会是死在街上都不会有人扶一下问一下的局面。
江苏省政府位于南京市，而南京市有一个如今已在海外各地因为大胆敢为，就是不会怕了世界各国的当地法律，执法机构及政府内部督察机构，以“尽管做，很确定就是什么事都不会有”为座右铭而非常著名的南师大附中的校友们，而地处南京的各级政府究竟有多少公务员政府干部是南师大附中毕业的借读过的，或者是否还有其它原因造成南京市政府及江苏省政府的负面立场，就不清楚了。我本人是以我父亲母亲失踪向美国报警的。只要我2004年在美国继承了一些信托财产是事实，我父母就有可能是遇到了法律问题而非健康问题。
我所听说的南师大附中校友的海外名作包括（每一个小作品都可以让你张嘴眨眼，自问“这是在开玩笑吗？”）：
1：某政府的财政厅被“控诉”欠了需离职公务员当初本人自己带来的1千万，让人不停自问“我怎么一直以为州财政厅就只有本州纳税人缴纳的税钱呢？”
2：做为类似社保金的退休金代为发放机构，就是可以自立一个传统，这传统就是有权利有自由，就是可以不乐意不乐意按照退休金代为支付的合同，就是不乐意不乐意将某公司的退休金计划按照该公司提供的名单按月支付给该公司的退休人员，就是乐意把这份退休金给东给西，想给谁就给谁，就是不给该公司的退休人员。就是“特别确定，这么做就是什么事都不会有！！！”
3: 都知道只要警察不管，想怎么拿钱从那里拿钱都可以。所以，"只要你可以说确保警察是不会管的其实是个计谋是个策略，你就可以随便拿钱了，你还可以派个警察持枪站在银行外面都可以，只要就是不管就得”。 还很确定，要是这么做，什么事都不会有的。（据说这不是南京的师大附中校友的海外作品，而是外地的一个师大附中的校友的作品。）
4：”只要听说有钱，你就说你认为那一定是捐款，不管那钱是存在了哪个机构或者个人的名下，你就是可以随便拿，你只要一口咬定你就是认为那是捐款就可以，至少在美国，这是在合法的随便拿钱"。所以，你就又听说了美国政府宣布一直在加强和世界各国的司法合作，因为美国的钱是在世界各国漫天的飞舞着。
...
N：在我高中毕业30多年后，又和南师大附中同班同届及校友会之类没什么联络近20年的情况下，听说是南师大附中的才是最清楚我是个什么东西的。所以，据说很多的纽约华人都听到了南师大附中的嘶吼“方敏，你他妈的有钱就交出来，没钱你就是南师大附中的耻辱。“
----2019年2月1日。
听说了一些有关“如果是父亲方文海继承了财产的话，会怎样？”的说法。
我的回应：其实这还是在基于是否我抢夺了我父亲的继承权的逻辑，很显然，提问的是为了我同父同母弟弟的婚姻家庭。
那么，如果是我父亲方文海继承了财产，我父亲能继承谁的财产？能继承那个爷爷的财产？
1： 我曾曾祖父方治兴是在1910年左右去世的，曾祖父方励其是在1930年去世，我爷爷方智仁1910年尚未出生，1930年尚未结婚，我父亲方文海1930时也还没生出来，我1930年时也是还没生出来。为何还会有”如果是父亲方文海继承财产“这个疑问？
2：我爷爷方智仁是1965年去世的，共育有四名子女，当时都在我爷爷的病塌前，由我爷爷分配了各自应分的我爷爷家产。我爷爷方智仁也没有剥夺我父亲方文海的继承权，只是将我父亲的所应继承财产做了恰当处理，完全是由我爷爷处理的，为何还会有”如果是我父亲方文海继承财产”这个疑问？听说了我父亲的一弟一妹没有全额拿到我爷爷所分配的遗产，那可能是被别人侵吞了，我父亲也不会清楚，所以应该是由我父亲弟妹自己报警处理的，不是应该由我来赔偿的。
如果这种疑问是出于都是做父母的心态，那我爷爷也是育有多名子女的，每一代爷爷都是，所以法律才会有按照遗嘱继承这一种继承类别啊？还有啊，我父亲留在南京的房子和存款，我可是听都没听说就已经不需要听说就都已经过户换名字了，所以我也会问啊，谁又忘了我父亲也确实是有两名亲生子女的？
----2019年2月1日。
江苏省政府位于南京市，而南京市有一个如今已在海外各地因为大胆敢为，就是不会怕了世界各国的当地法律，执法机构及政府内部督察机构，以“尽管做，很确定就是什么事都不会有”为座右铭而非常著名的南师大附中的校友们，而地处南京的各级政府究竟有多少公务员政府干部是南师大附中毕业的借读过的，或者是否还有其它原因造成南京市政府及江苏省政府的负面立场，就不清楚了。我本人是以我父亲母亲失踪向美国报警的。只要我2004年在美国继承了一些信托财产是事实，我父母就有可能是遇到了法律问题而非健康问题。
我所听说的南师大附中校友的海外名作包括（每一个小作品都可以让你张嘴眨眼，自问“这是在开玩笑吗？”）：
1：某政府的财政厅被“控诉”欠了需离职公务员当初本人自己带来的1千万，让人不停自问“我怎么一直以为州财政厅就只有本州纳税人缴纳的税钱呢？”
2：做为类似社保金的退休金代为发放机构，就是可以自立一个传统，这传统就是有权利有自由，就是可以不乐意不乐意按照退休金代为支付的合同，就是不乐意不乐意将某公司的退休金计划按照该公司提供的名单按月支付给该公司的退休人员，就是乐意把这份退休金给东给西，想给谁就给谁，就是不给该公司的退休人员。就是“特别确定，这么做就是什么事都不会有！！！”
3: 都知道只要警察不管，想怎么拿钱从那里拿钱都可以。所以，"只要你可以说确保警察是不会管的其实是个计谋是个策略，你就可以随便拿钱了，你还可以派个警察持枪站在银行外面都可以，只要就是不管就得”。 还很确定，要是这么做，什么事都不会有的。（据说这不是南京的师大附中校友的海外作品，而是外地的一个师大附中的校友的作品。）
4：”只要听说有钱，你就说你认为那一定是捐款，不管那钱是存在了哪个机构或者个人的名下，你就是可以随便拿，你只要一口咬定你就是认为那是捐款就可以，至少在美国，这是在合法的随便拿钱"。所以，你就又听说了美国政府宣布一直在加强和世界各国的司法合作，因为美国的钱是在世界各国漫天的飞舞着。
...
N：在我高中毕业30多年后，又和南师大附中同班同届及校友会之类没什么联络近20年的情况下，听说是南师大附中的才是最清楚我是个什么东西的。所以，据说很多的纽约华人都听到了南师大附中的嘶吼“方敏，你他妈的有钱就交出来，没钱你就是南师大附中的耻辱。“
----2019年2月1日。
听说了一些有关“如果是父亲方文海继承了财产的话，会怎样？”的说法。
我的回应：其实这还是在基于是否我抢夺了我父亲的继承权的逻辑，很显然，提问的是为了我同父同母弟弟的婚姻家庭。
那么，如果是我父亲方文海继承了财产，我父亲能继承谁的财产？能继承那个爷爷的财产？
1： 我曾曾祖父方治兴是在1910年左右去世的，曾祖父方励其是在1930年去世，我爷爷方智仁1910年尚未出生，1930年尚未结婚，我父亲方文海1930时也还没生出来，我1930年时也是还没生出来。为何还会有”如果是父亲方文海继承财产“这个疑问？
2：我爷爷方智仁是1965年去世的，共育有四名子女，当时都在我爷爷的病塌前，由我爷爷分配了各自应分的我爷爷家产。我爷爷方智仁也没有剥夺我父亲方文海的继承权，只是将我父亲的所应继承财产做了恰当处理，完全是由我爷爷处理的，为何还会有”如果是我父亲方文海继承财产”这个疑问？听说了我父亲的一弟一妹没有全额拿到我爷爷所分配的遗产，那可能是被别人侵吞了，我父亲也不会清楚，所以应该是由我父亲弟妹自己报警处理的，不是应该由我来赔偿的。
如果这种疑问是出于都是做父母的心态，那我爷爷也是育有多名子女的，每一代爷爷都是，所以法律才会有按照遗嘱继承这一种继承类别啊？还有啊，我父亲留在南京的房子和存款，我可是听都没听说就已经不需要听说就都已经过户换名字了，所以我也会问啊，谁又忘了我父亲也确实是有两名亲生子女的？
----2019年2月1日。
爸爸，有关爷爷为什么1965年一分钱都没给你, 我听说的是：
1：因为奶奶和丁姓私人助理之间的性关系，因为丁姓私人助理听说你们四兄妹只有爸爸一个是爷爷的亲骨肉，所以，丁姓私人助理一直都有要求奶奶自己的肚子替他生个孩子，或者认养一个丁姓私人助理妻子已育的小孩作为爷爷的婚生孩子。
2： 1957-1958年奶奶去世前的住院期间，丁姓私人助理又再次强调此要求。奶奶就此和爷爷有过澄清，就是奶奶从未答应认养丁姓私人助理的妻子已育的孩子。
3：1965年爷爷去世前的住院期间，丁姓私人助理又再次强调此要求，说是奶奶答应过替他生一个，何况爷爷愿意将奶奶生的三个非亲生的婚生子女认养并给与财产。
我听说爷爷当时很难过，又没法查实，所以爷爷在1965年对此的回答及处理办法是：爷爷表态他本人从来不缺女人也从未需要过奶奶的子宫，如果早知奶奶一直如此不堪，他本人早就已经离婚了。爷爷表态他最多就是会支付奶奶的子宫孕育爸爸的那10个月的子宫费，这个子宫费付清后，爸爸及爸爸今后所育子女就和奶奶的子宫永远没有任何关系了, 也和“究竟1949年以后奶奶的子宫应该算是谁的”这个疑问也永远没有任何关系了。所以爷爷就把爷爷准备给爸爸的一份遗产（2万多元钱）给了丁姓私人助理。爷爷也是按照原计划将其遗产分配给了他的其他三名子女。
4： 就我所知，其他三名子女也应该是爷爷亲生子女。我本人对于丁姓私人助理子女要求按（认养）婚生子女身份平分财产（即我2004年承诺给爸爸弟妹的礼物）的回应也是“只要奶奶的子宫入口没在他们嘴里舔着, 我就是不会理睬他们”。（我是基于估计，如果我不说舔着，他们就会天天谈着。）
----2019年1月28日。
1：因为奶奶和丁姓私人助理之间的性关系，因为丁姓私人助理听说你们四兄妹只有爸爸一个是爷爷的亲骨肉，所以，丁姓私人助理一直都有要求奶奶自己的肚子替他生个孩子，或者认养一个丁姓私人助理妻子已育的小孩作为爷爷的婚生孩子。
2： 1957-1958年奶奶去世前的住院期间，丁姓私人助理又再次强调此要求。奶奶就此和爷爷有过澄清，就是奶奶从未答应认养丁姓私人助理的妻子已育的孩子。
3：1965年爷爷去世前的住院期间，丁姓私人助理又再次强调此要求，说是奶奶答应过替他生一个，何况爷爷愿意将奶奶生的三个非亲生的婚生子女认养并给与财产。
我听说爷爷当时很难过，又没法查实，所以爷爷在1965年对此的回答及处理办法是：爷爷表态他本人从来不缺女人也从未需要过奶奶的子宫，如果早知奶奶一直如此不堪，他本人早就已经离婚了。爷爷表态他最多就是会支付奶奶的子宫孕育爸爸的那10个月的子宫费，这个子宫费付清后，爸爸及爸爸今后所育子女就和奶奶的子宫永远没有任何关系了, 也和“究竟1949年以后奶奶的子宫应该算是谁的”这个疑问也永远没有任何关系了。所以爷爷就把爷爷准备给爸爸的一份遗产（2万多元钱）给了丁姓私人助理。爷爷也是按照原计划将其遗产分配给了他的其他三名子女。
4： 就我所知，其他三名子女也应该是爷爷亲生子女。我本人对于丁姓私人助理子女要求按（认养）婚生子女身份平分财产（即我2004年承诺给爸爸弟妹的礼物）的回应也是“只要奶奶的子宫入口没在他们嘴里舔着, 我就是不会理睬他们”。（我是基于估计，如果我不说舔着，他们就会天天谈着。）
----2019年1月28日。
01-30-2019 Modern Contemporary and Classic Tradition
I was often doubted how I can claim I am a Chinese Emperors' heir without the People's Republic of China's acknowledgment? I say because the heirship is by the blood and family inheriting rule, not by the People.
----Jan. 30th, 2019
I was often confronted with as long as the Chinese government does not acknowledge, I say only because you are such a barbarian who doesn't know THE CLASS represents the culture with history, not just modern contemporary of round-shape impressionism or functional consciousness that you heard of.
----Jan. 30th, 2019
So I was asked, but how do I say I am truthful on the matter after my own family lost track of the family stories? I say by confronting matter and probing for an answer. Let's see how many doubts about the matter so far.
1: The paintings published on the internet in 2011 were all one-year-old copies,
I heard they were all from the digital version of the originals that each comes with a year certificate.
2: The year certificate has the year 1927, year 1970...on it.
I heard it represents the edition of the photo, the copied-from edition is a digital version.
3: How these paintings relate me to be the heir of the featured Emperors?
First of all, both my father and I resemble my Emperor-ancestors featured in these family portraits.
Second, my 2004's Trust-inheriting was a birthmark-inheriting(updated on Feb. 3rd, 2019)
Also, I own Emperor equivalent entitlements such as Ingonyama etc. originated by them, and I own these family portraits gifted by them since my lawfully valid willed Trust-Inheriting in 2004.
As so popular in a lot of Kingdom-novels, a King normally gift a person with an entitlement, some valuables (gold, jewelry, etc.), and a beauty.
Well, I am the daughter gifted by my ancient birth Emperor-grandfathers, so I only received entitlements and valuables from my Trust-Inheriting, which means I need to find my handsome, with my ancestors' blessing but won't be an assigned.
----Jan. 30th, 2019
1: Ingonyama title is in the local language, but I came from China?
My response: There are two possibilities for how I got this entitlement officially on June 30th of 2004.
1) I received the original entitlement, given by my ancient Emperor grandfather in Chinese, together with my Trust-Inheriting, Ingonyama its translation in the local language, or
2) this is the entitlement of my ancient grandfather's that I inherited together with the my Trust-Inheriting as the direct-beneficiary-heir of the entitled ancient grandfather of mine.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019
01-28-2019 How a novel, a TV series, or a radio program(show) is evaluated and granted to be published.
Another anger I often encounter is the anger from talented literature people: Why I can have the privilege of being the major featured person of this radio program?
I once said I never read scripted lines that every joke or thought was my own articulation as a plus, I said this has been accumulated over the years because the audio raw materials have been from my security tape which has started recording every second since the moment I was born. Some said they all have this type of audio raw material as well, why their thoughts and their articulation are not this privileged? I say they had never thought of so before 2004 was the reason that I was privileged, and they possibly won't persist on publishing their privileges currently because of the sensitiveness from whom have been participating in their thoughts-sharing.
I once expressed my understanding about those English majored literature person, about their anger why it is so easy for me to be recognized in their profession knowing I was never a literature person? I will explain this as much as possible from the knowledge I recently learned from MBA.
The process of how to evaluate and to grant an opportunity to publish a novel, a TV series, or a radio program (show). （小说，电视剧和广播剧的遴选发行的程序是什么？）
Step 1: When a publishing representative producer(editor) is approached with a piece of work, this producer need to evaluate this piece of work's academic value, and if good, to recommend to publishing executives:（编辑初选）
1)Theme evaluation based on the trends of the readers' choice:（对于作品题材的初选）
- Currently in favor of? Belong to categories that have up-rising favor in readers' choice. recently? Or not obvious yet, but will be in reader favorable trend in this producer's personal opinion.（题材是否是读者喜欢的及喜欢程度等）
- How this theme is expressed? Expression style? Frame style of the storytelling, etc.（观点表达能力及写作水平）
...
1) Based on if publishing can upgrade this publishing company's academic value.（学术价值文学价值很高)
2) Based on if publishing can be a best-seller, profitable, etc. (是否可以盈利）
3) Based on if publishing can fulfill publishing company's social responsibility. (保护地球之类的题材，类似中国的政治任务）
...
Step 3: When a publishing financing executive received a recommendation from a publishing executive, the publishing financing executive will make funding evaluation, and if good, to recommend to publishing CEO to print.（是否能挤进有限的出版指标？）
1) Based on if profitable and how profitable it can be, (根据是否可以盈利值得投资）
2) Based on if easy to raise special funding from somewhere,（发行费用是否可以筹措）
...
Step 4: When the publishing CEO received a recommendation from a publishing financing executive, the publishing CEO need to evaluate possible sales if publish and if worth a try, to grant the pilot publishing. （出版总编的总评估，是否可以短时间小批量的实验性发行）
1) Based on experience from company's publishing history,（根据公司以前的类似销售纪录）
2) Based on distribution channels feedback. (销售点会不会进货？）
....
Step 5: When the pilot time finished, the publishing CEO will make the decision of official publishing if funding is not an issue. （实验性发行结束后，出版总编会作出是否正式发行的决定）
1) Based on the rating(sales) during the pilot time. (实验性发行期间的收听率，销量）
2) Based on the profitability during the pilot time, from sales or advertising income.（实验性发行期间的销售额和广告收入）
3) Based on if enlarged producing can have funding and how much. (扩大发行需要多少资金）
...
How I was granted pilot publishing(broadcasting) as a major featured person? （我是如何获得试发行的机会成为广播剧的主要人物的？）
1) The pass of Step 3 and 4: I heard on July 1st of 2004, some distribution channels already giving "will participate in broadcasting" feedback, investor-funding was granted, both during the meeting. （第三步和第四步：当时在2004年7月1日的会上，就有广播公司（就是我的生活费用给付的合法性核实的6+1个国家的）表态会参与播出，（就是我的生活费用给付的付款公司）表态会参与投资，还有一些的个人投资, 听说是一百万美金一个，共7百万投资。
2) The pass of Step 5: I heard only one-month pilot broadcasting already generated good rating and good advertising income to cover full-scale producing and publishing (broadcasting) and to be handsomely profitable to the publishing company (radio company). （第五步，我听说一个月的实验性发行结束后，收听率就已经很高，所产生的广告收入也已经可以由广播剧的广告收入本身提供资金支持广播剧的最大发行量出版了，广播公司的收益预计可以很可观。）
3) The pass of Step 2: I heard the reason is: This radio program is the first time uniqueness in radio broadcasting history: Reality show produced from audio raw materials collected from the major featured person's historically accumulated security tape. （第二步，我听说筛选通过的原因是：这个广播剧由主要人物的保安影像记录提供该人物的历史语音资料作为广播剧制作的制作素材资料是广播史上的第一次。）
I will update if I heard how this was officially evaluated in step 1, I know I sell my story good in the same meeting, and I heard the step 1 evaluation was broadcasted in the radio program over 2-3 years ago. （我听说两三年前广播剧就已经播放过当时第一步是如何评估的。）
Why some Mrs. Rockefellers and some Mrs. Fords have been so angry about me and the radio program?
My response: I assume, it was because I was not really even associated, while they are the married wives from the entertainment industry background but never have such a privilege in R and F names' family investments. The process of how step 3 and step 4 could be passed at the spot so immediately on July 1st of 2004 was not just unfair to them but also insulting to those who truly romantically involved and associated with.
But the truth was I am the heir Missy, not a wife nor a short romance, to my own birth ancient grandfathers' Trusts that have been investing in those 6+1 counties' participating broadcasting companies. This was explained at the moment already that they themselves have been interested to know who I am was the reason for the willingness to participate in the broadcasting distribution. These participating companies are not Ford name nor Rockefeller name majorly invested.
The work-centric evaluation based pass of step1 and professional evaluation based pass of step5 are the real true reasons for this radio program's public channel's longtime popular broadcasting.
----Feb. 7th, 2019
01-27-2019 How one's intellectual Income is evaluated? (智慧专利收入是如何评估的？）
I was asked often how I can earn intellectual income? I was so not a hard-working student when I was in school that no one from any school I graduated from could imagine I could possibly be a person who can have some intellectual income. I say this group of people also include those colleagues from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, but not from Janus Associates who watched me developed modules of Biogate, my first intellectual income. How I grew into a research type of person?
When I was assigned a job in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, I was a girly college newly graduated who fully welcomed leadership education from Health Department Inspectors I worked with. My work experiences there did not shape into a good lab research tester, but made me into a coercive leader-apprentice enjoyed the opportunities to say, "Do As I Said".
My second job was a computer programmer where I assigned to work on BioGate project, this work experience was when I learned "to form my own hypothesis independently, to discover dynamics in trending independently, and to relate complexities with theories independently. "(quoted from my personal statement of schooling)
Currently, I am in training to be a business leader which means I am in process of being less research geek style but become more humanly understandable, I can tell it is not an easy process so far because still too many people complaining "don't know what she is saying".
Ok, after I briefly explained why I do have some intellectual incomes, let me try to explain how my share of intellectual incomes is evaluated from the best of my knowledge.
Intellectual Incomes evaluation process:
Step 1: When a research project is successfully finished and ready for sale, the first step is to evaluate how much is the price this project can ask.
This project price evaluation would be conducted by a professional evaluation company, and evaluation is based on how much time and cost would be needed in average to conduct such research by an average peer in the industry. This project evaluation would detail each module and each component of the entire project to have a price as the negotiation base for the research company to bargain with possible buyers.
Step 2: After a successful sale of the research project, the research company would decide the size of rewarding package for the entire group of all kinds of contributors to this research project. The rewarding company would also decide the share for each contributor group, such as research group, helping group, and etc in the company's level of the rewarding package.
Step 3: Once research group's rewarding package size is decided, the research department will evaluate rewarding shares for each component's research group, which is based on the project price evaluation report of each component as well as research participating years.
Step 4: Once each component's rewarding size is decided, each individual contributor's share to this same component can be evaluated based on each academic contribution.
How can my brief idea contribute intellectually?
Let's see the example of my idea to have a hair growth product based on 章光101(?). My idea is a concept hypothesis and the academic direction of a research project. If I contributed, its market price should also be in the project evaluation report as a component, and I will be evaluated with the contributors of this same component.
How to tell public relation help with research contribution help?
From my own experience: When research got stuck, help can be from public relation if the research company does not have internal resources to help out. This internal helping resource is also the reason why researchers from a big research company have much less share in their company's rewarding packages. And IRS has the standard to different research contribution help with public relation help to ensure the correct income tax rate.
----Jan. 27th, 2019
很多人经常问我，我哪有可能会有智慧专利收入？读书时，我确实不是一个用功的学生，我所毕业的每一所学校，就没人相信我居然可以有智慧专利收入。我说这拨人还得加上我曾经工作过的南京市药品检验所，不过我的第二份工作，就是美国的电脑公司的同事就不会这么说了，因为他们都是亲眼看着我一天一点的做出了Bio Gate这个研究项目。那我究竟是如何成长为一个研究人员的？
当我大学毕业分配到南京市药品检验所上班时，我就只是一个大学刚毕业的女孩，特别喜欢跟着卫生局药品监督室的工作人员学习当领导，这第一个工作没让我成为一个实验室的强手，而是让我有机会练习独立强硬的领导风格，我也非常喜欢练习这一句“就照我说的办”。
我的第二份工作是电脑程序员，接到的项目就是Bio Gate。是这份工作的研究经历让我学会了自己"独立的决定研究方向，独立的发现变化中的动态界定因素，独立的将研究所经历的复杂性与相应的理论相联系。”（摘自我自己写的一份上学用的《自我介绍》）
目前，我因为在读MBA的企业管理，所以我正在努力让自己少一点研究人员“不理世俗事”的倔强，多培养一点可让凡人都可沟通的理解，不过我很清楚这过程不那么简单，目前还是有太多人在抱怨“根本就不知道她在说什么做什么”。
好了，简略地说清楚了我确实是有智慧专利收入的，我来尽我的能力解释一下智慧专利收入都是如何评估的。
智慧产权的评估过程：
第一步：当一个研究项目成功且可以出售时，第一步就是对这个研究额项目可能的市场价值做个评估。
这个研究项目的市场价值评估是由专门的评估公司进行的，评估是根据“如果这个行业里的一个中等水平的企业需要做这样一个研究，会需要多少时间和经费”来评估的。这个研究项目的评估报告还会详细列举这个项目中的每一个部分每一个环节的可能市场价值，作为研究公司和可能买家进行讨价还价的依据。
第二步：一个科研项目成功卖出后，研究公司就会决定智慧专利奖金的一些细节奖励对于研究项目成功的各种贡献人员。研究奖励公司也会决定各贡献部门的各自奖金规模（由公司发放的），包括研究部门，辅助部门等等。
第三步：当研究部门拿到公司给予的奖金规模，研究部门就会依据这个研究项目的市场价值评估报告中的细节单价来决定每一个环节每一个部分的奖金大小，再根据参与研究人员的学术贡献及参与研究团队的年份予以评估（这一步有点像国内的上下级单位一起的分房，专利奖金就是“上级单位可以拿到的总房源”）。
第四步，当每一个环节的小组奖金的多少决定了之后，这个小组的所有参与人员再根据贡献大小评估各自的奖金。（这一步就是国内的下级单位分房）
类似我的一些简短概念型的一两句话贡献，又是如何评估的？
那就看一下我2004年7月一日有一段利用章光101来研究头发生长产品的主意。我的主意其实就是一个研究项目的概念立项和研究方向。如果我做出了贡献，也就是说我的概念和方向让研究课题立项了，也成功了，也可以赚钱了，按照这个研究概念方向对这个研究项目成功所做出的这一份贡献的市场价值也是在整个研究项目的市场价值的评估报告中的一个细节项目，我也会和其他参与这个概念立项环节的人员一起参与奖金评估。
如何区别对于研究项目的公共关系类帮助和智慧投入类帮助？
从我自己的研究经历：当研究遇到卡壳的时候，当研究单位内部的资料室没有相关资料可协助研究时，公共关系类的帮助让研究人员可以查阅一些外部资料，对研究项目的贡献是很大的。这个内部资料室是很多大的研究机构的研究员在其单位的专利奖金里的份额不高的很大原因（内部资料室是公司的智慧实力所以是属于公司的奖励份额，不是个人份额）。因为公关奖金收入（美国联邦税30%左右）和智慧专利收入(美国联邦税10%）的税率不同，所以税务局有严格规定标准来区分究竟奖金所得是属于公关奖金还是智慧奖金。
----2019年1月27日。
第二步：一个科研项目成功卖出后，研究公司就会决定智慧专利奖金的一些细节奖励对于研究项目成功的各种贡献人员。研究奖励公司也会决定各贡献部门的各自奖金规模（由公司发放的），包括研究部门，辅助部门等等。
第三步：当研究部门拿到公司给予的奖金规模，研究部门就会依据这个研究项目的市场价值评估报告中的细节单价来决定每一个环节每一个部分的奖金大小，再根据参与研究人员的学术贡献及参与研究团队的年份予以评估（这一步有点像国内的上下级单位一起的分房，专利奖金就是“上级单位可以拿到的总房源”）。
第四步，当每一个环节的小组奖金的多少决定了之后，这个小组的所有参与人员再根据贡献大小评估各自的奖金。（这一步就是国内的下级单位分房）
类似我的一些简短概念型的一两句话贡献，又是如何评估的？
那就看一下我2004年7月一日有一段利用章光101来研究头发生长产品的主意。我的主意其实就是一个研究项目的概念立项和研究方向。如果我做出了贡献，也就是说我的概念和方向让研究课题立项了，也成功了，也可以赚钱了，按照这个研究概念方向对这个研究项目成功所做出的这一份贡献的市场价值也是在整个研究项目的市场价值的评估报告中的一个细节项目，我也会和其他参与这个概念立项环节的人员一起参与奖金评估。
如何区别对于研究项目的公共关系类帮助和智慧投入类帮助？
从我自己的研究经历：当研究遇到卡壳的时候，当研究单位内部的资料室没有相关资料可协助研究时，公共关系类的帮助让研究人员可以查阅一些外部资料，对研究项目的贡献是很大的。这个内部资料室是很多大的研究机构的研究员在其单位的专利奖金里的份额不高的很大原因（内部资料室是公司的智慧实力所以是属于公司的奖励份额，不是个人份额）。因为公关奖金收入（美国联邦税30%左右）和智慧专利收入(美国联邦税10%）的税率不同，所以税务局有严格规定标准来区分究竟奖金所得是属于公关奖金还是智慧奖金。
----2019年1月27日。
01-23-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （12）--- 刘凯故事的播出制作
（我一直在做解释，就因为我一直在被这个问题困扰: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗？自1985年从高中毕业到现在这么多年，我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，能管你们这些同一个高中毕业的什么事？怎么都应该被你们吆喝“凭什么”？还要联合起来对付我？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，我就欠了你们的了？听说他们的愤怒居然是: 他们就是难以相信我居然敢把钱直接放进自己的口袋里？我的什么钱居然就是不可以放进我自己的口袋里？！！！！南师大附中的：我在美国20年的过去就从未联系过你们，今后也不会需要联系你们。----2019年1月26日。）
我方敏是南师大附中85届2班毕业的，但我不是这个班毕业的其他人的同学。我已经学到了这个知识，我会终身记得的。我也听到了这个班毕业的其他人的声明，那是正常了，既不是朋友，又不是同学，还能是什么态度还能说些什么话？我也是这样了。----2019年1月27日。
有人说，我是否需要如此立场，我方敏态度，如果我听说的传言真实，一切都是预谋，我方敏就认为我方敏是需要而且必须是如此立场态度。因为我方敏不愿因为认识了这些南师大附中毕业的，就被算计，就被暗算，就被陷害，就被设计而成为任何意义上的受害者。我目前是已经在法律保护下，我今后也会毫不犹豫需求法律保护而不被这些人骚扰，恐吓，威胁。----2019年1月31日。
（听说刘凯已和她的儿子在美国团圆，听说目前各方也都在按照她本人的意愿保护她的新的婚姻。如果听到今天早上的播出内容，就应该很清楚所宣布的就是我不可能是弄清传言是否真实的人选。就此类声明传言，我方敏只会强调我方敏的私人财产和这些名字人物统统无关，也不是他们的婚姻伴侣所可以任意占领的，我也已经就这些传言报警处理。如对有关刘凯的传言有任何疑问，请接洽南师大附中高中85届2班的其他在美同学，我和这些85届的（包括在波士顿的），甚至南师大附中的其他校友统统都没有联络，今后也不会有任何联络。----2019年1月24日。）
听说，在南师大附中校友中，很多人非常气愤的是刘凯婚姻家庭故事的制作播出对刘凯本人生活所造成的负面影响。
我先说明并请查实：
1：我本人从未参与广播剧的制作，也从未听到过广播剧的制作版本或播出版本。
2：我听说的，广播剧有关刘凯故事的制作是在国内制作，所采用的是由刘凯授权的国内商业运作模式剪辑制作宣传促销。
我听说的，刘凯本人的难以理解在于为什么她的故事只是有限收入，而非百分比的利润提成？刘凯的愤怒是为什么她被“如此当众处罚”， 而我却是按百分比提成？在可以查实上述两点说明的前提下，我对此的解释：
1：广播剧是在2005年在美国广播公司上线播出，2007年年底左右被中国进口在中国播放。刘凯的故事在国内可以被商业制作就是因为有这个热播的广播剧作为播放平台，而我按百分比利润提成就是广播公司对于我的人生经历对广播剧热播贡献的奖励。也就是俗话说的，如果没有我的这个热播中的广播剧作为播放渠道，刘凯的婚姻家庭故事就卖不出一个子。
(我和美国制作团队的提成和投资人一样，是在美国的广播剧发行总公司的利润里提取，而作为我曾经的高中同学大学同学等等参与广播剧制作的，有适当的由制作中心从广播剧的制作费里所支付的参与酬谢金；或者类似刘凯这种，作为我曾经的高中同班同学参与广播剧制作，又同时有她自己独立的婚姻家庭故事的，所领取的是由制作中心从广播剧的制作费里所支付的故事费，所领取金额大小也是由制作中心根据中国美国相关法律，广播公司的公司规定和所参与制作的故事情节的可能收听率（也就是市场价值）所决定的，我方敏本人完全没有参与价格的制定。我听说的：美国制作中心对这些类似刘凯婚姻家庭的独立故事的制作规定是 1)故事的市场吸引力，至少是可以让广播剧继续保持已有的收听率，2）制作费用不得高于多少 ---- 2019年1月26日更新）
（类似于综艺节目来说明，中国制作中心类似是特邀评审，这些独立故事人物就是类似综艺节目的特约嘉宾，美国制作团队和我的基本人生经历故事制作就是在保持该综艺节目的收视率，这样，这些特邀评审和特约嘉宾可以有参与制作费甚至可以高一些。----2019年2月8日）
（我和广播剧美国制作团队能够拿到广播公司给予的百分比提成作为奖励，就是因为我的人生经历和制作团队的努力将广播剧制作成了一个非常成功的播放平台，这点就类似于国内的综艺节目，支持人和采编团队的努力就是让综艺类节目成为了一个可以让参与节目的人一炮而红的播放平台。刘凯的故事及其他的参与者就是因为有了这么一个播放平台才可以有每集的参与制作费用及故事费。如果广播剧不是一个盈利的播出平台，刘凯的故事在中国包括江苏人民广播电台的播出（综艺或者社会探讨栏目）都是不会有任何故事费可以领取的，更不用说其他人只是在广播上说几句话就可以拿到的丰厚参与费用了。因为一切费用的支付都是根据美国中国的法律及行规而给付的，所以，我（的收入）和刘凯的故事究竟如何给付也没有任何直接关系。---- 2019年1月26日更新）
(听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。
我的回应是：这是误会。首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍，
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民和东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人而很多没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。----2019年2月26日）
我一直也被这个问题困扰: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗，怎么个我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，都应该被你们吆喝？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，就欠了你们的了？
我一直也被这个问题困扰: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗，怎么个我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，都应该被你们吆喝？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，就欠了你们的了？
我本人在2015年2016年时期，也一再就国内一些人士认为他们自己也可以让任何广播剧成功而表态：各个国家的广播公司很多，频道很多，时段也很多，为什么不找广播公司推销你们自己故事，做你们自己的广播剧？非得砸了我的广播剧？这不是钱的问题，或者广播剧是不是播出时间太长该下线了的问题，是我本人的名誉受到很大影响。
美国方面很多人也有国内类似看法，所以从2015年年底开始，他们替换了整个制作团队，对我进行痛骂打砸，并大幅增加其他人物故事，以区分并呈现不同，就为使用这同一个热播平台展现各自才华。我听说的，从2016年3月起，广播剧就不再热播，并造就一堆的投诉和法律问题，我本人是从2015年年底起就本人名誉受损一再报警。
2：刘凯的婚姻家庭故事的商业运作范围主要局限在中国，是因为这一类问题在美国属于法律处理的范围，没有中国国内的全民纠结。
在美国，一旦碰到孩子被证实是婚姻外所育这一类事情，做丈夫的，首先是搬出夫妻的共同居所，然后诉请离婚或婚姻无效，也就是寻求法律支持，拒绝支付孩子生活费用。这婚姻纠结就解决了，这婚姻家庭故事就结束了。这在美国是通识常识，没人会将刘凯婚姻家庭故事作为社会问题探讨，所以刘凯的婚姻家庭故事对世界其他法制先进国家的广播公司的吸引力有限。刘凯的故事在广播剧里的播出，播出内容其实并没有强调她的婚姻故事的对与错，而是强调中国的国情及美国的法律处理之间的差别。
我听说的，刘凯的收入中，1）一部分是由制作费用支付的，由国内的一家艺术中心从美国公司所支付的这几集的制作费用中支付的，2）还有很大一部分就是广播剧播出后的周边产品所产生的广告收入所支出的，也就是俗称的听众点评节目所吸引的广告，这一部分是由国内广播电台作为播放公司所支付的，我听说和刘凯的分成比例很高。据说美国没有类似的听众点评所产生的广告收入，刘凯就不会有美国方面的评论节目广播电台所支付的广告收入提成。至于其他亚洲国家是否有类似听众点评，应该可以向广播公司查询。
我本人广播剧收入的百分比提成是由各国购买节目及广告收入提成后的美国制作播出公司的总利润里提成的，也就是我的提成基数是在刘凯的收入作为广播公司的制作及促销播出的成本费用予以扣减后，才进行核算的，与刘凯故事的制作播出收入没有任何直接关系。
举例说明：
1：剧集播放版权的销售收入，按播放季节（年）计算。如果广播剧的剧集是1万元一集，每天一集，中国买一季（年）就是365万。当年由中国制作的刘凯节目只有几集。
2：广告收益提成，也是按播放季节（年）计算，主要收入都是在广播剧的主要播放时段所产生的，听众点评节目所产生的很少，而且不是固定收入（只有在一些听众点评节目愿意点评所播出的内容时才会有）。听说刘凯挨骂主要是因为听众点评节目。
3：如果按照合同，中国播出公司需要交给美国公司这一年由广播剧时段播段所产生的广告利润的50%，这也就是已经扣除了因为这几集而由刘凯本人所产生的听众点评相关的广告收入分成收入之后所计算出的利润，而且还是全年收入。
这两项，是美国广播公司的广播剧收入，还要再扣除美国方面的制作和推销的成本等等之后，才是我的百分比提成的计算基数。所以说，我的百分比提成和刘凯故事的商业运作没有直接关系。
我的意思就是：刘凯故事的2009年所制作的，后期剪辑成7天应该是美国团队，美国人因为很熟悉法律处理方式，没有中国国内对此类婚姻问题的一腔愤怒，所以，对她的婚姻应该没有任何对错的指责，也没有愤怒控诉，就只是报道中美对此婚姻问题的不同处理方式。播出前后，中国以外地区的收听率也应该不会有很大波动（这些都可以查核）。在中国，如果播出前后的收听率有很大波动，那就看一下广告客户广告收入是否有很大波动。就我所知，广播剧的广告收入来源主要是广播剧播出时段的广告收入，点评节目的广告收入份量很小。
如果刘凯本人或南师大附中的校友对我的解释有疑问，请接洽广播剧的制作播出公司以寻求真相。如果我本人言论与事实真相之间有重大区别，可以电邮给我予以纠正。电邮地址：somebodyinMA@gmail.com
----2019年1月23日。
刘凯故事的商业运作，可能是所有中国女人都可以对我方敏高吼：“就是要操了你的男人，就是要拿了你的钱，就是够资格“的原因。估计现在是掀锅盖的时候，来表达“你他妈的算老几”。我是在美国已经报警了。
据说是从2009年起，就实施了这份操作。她还在中国政府安排下，由别人付费整容后，特意与我喜欢的什么男人谈恋爱，不知真假，也不知是哪一个。据说就是2003年8-9月间我在华盛顿维州的Hyatt（假日酒店）大厅遇见的那一个，还一再强调，很确定就是同一个才。。。。
气的就是这份气势："他妈的，就是冲着这人是你喜欢的男人才要操的，中国政府就是有这个能力有这个实力拉这个皮条"。要是真实，中国政府根本就是妓院打杂的下贱本事下贱做法下贱有效，中国政府所呈现的本事能力，也就是妓院的打杂的就是会乘着替妓女拎个屎盆子出来倒倒的机会，顺便在你身上泼点，耍点小聪敏，就为恶心死你。
----2019年1月23日。
01-21-2019 与南京方面的矛盾(11) --- 广播剧制作和南师大附中85届2班（乙班）的刘凯 （A classmate from the high school )
听说刘凯前夫刘丹是否在和刘凯结婚之前已育有小孩，是造成刘凯婚姻困扰的原因，也是造成刘凯及很多南师大附中校友认为我1996年当时做法很离谱的原因。听说广播剧对此“是否有小孩”的报道是：英文用的是“Abortion”（流产，意即没有离开母体存活的小孩），中文用的是“引产”（可能有离开母体后存活的小孩） 。我本人是在1990年以后曾听刘凯说过刘丹很花心，但只在2015年以后才听说刘丹以前的恋爱故事花絮。
Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy by removal or expulsion of an embryo or fetus before it can survive outside the uterus.[note 1] （from： https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion ）
----2019年8月2日增。
I had never romantically associated or socially close to her ex-husband or his associated, in high school or after graduation.]
I don't have a male's middle section, and I don't have Liu, Kai's female middle section, please don't ever consult any money matter associated with any male's middle section nor Liu, Kai's female middle section. I am not the person care about this article featured Liu, Kai in any way nor anyhow.
I don't have a male's middle section, and I don't have other female's middle section but my own, please don't ever consult any money matter associated with any male's middle section nor any female's middle section except my own. I am not the person care about any matter associated with any male's middle section nor any female's middle section except my own.
(----updated on Jan. 22nd, 2019)
Liu, Kai graduated from the same class of 1985's Nanjing Teacher's College Affiliated High School. I heard radio program had featured some stories of her family and her marriage. Before I left China in 1996, I was not happy with her attitude about how she insisted on to let the entire world know "the only person would truly interest in me" was a happily married, aged and dwarf man from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, I was not tough on expressing myself strong opposite opinion because of the situation that I was leaving China for good.
When I visited her in China in 2007, her attitude toward me had been "who the fxxx you think you are?" and challenging. I truly don't think I need nor obligated to be in touch with this person, and I never contacted her ever since. I will never get in touch with such a person.
I heard about in 2010 that my round-trip ticket to the U.S. that I bought from another same class graduated in 1996 was ￥4000-5000 higher than it should be. I heard it was per her request which was after she voluntarily lent me ￥3000 which I had paid back by the end of 1997 with the amount of ￥4500.
In 2009, I heard rumors that she had a car accident in Nanjing which was right after the featured broadcasting of her stories, but I did not hear any negative reactions from the Chinese community in Boston, so I thought the rumor was either untrue or she came out OK. I heard recently that she never had such a car accident and she has been living with her son in the U.S. for some years already. I heard she may have participated producing the radio program, which I assume has been the reason of such base theme in the radio program as "who the fxxx you think you are?", "I do the exact opposite of whatever you say", and "you will be so lucky if you can ever be wanted sexually."
I heard she remarried well, and tons of rumors about how well her marriage has been. I declare I have independent finance from any male's middle section, and I will never have any financial association with this Liu, Kai, her family associated, and her marriage associated.
Other clarifications that I need to make:
1: About her maiden family before 1996. She told me that her mother's husband, a retired veteran in 1996, had been very nice to her, and always willing to handsomely answer her financial demands including her wedding costs in 1992. Her mother's apartment was related to her mother's workplace and, possibly registered in her mother's name. This was pretty much I had spilled in that 1996 conversation in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control.
2: About her own marriage. She told me during my 2007 visit that she had a divorce after 2004, her ex-husband paid her son's support monthly from Canada.
----Jan. 21st, 2019
我只是也是她的前夫的高中同班同学，在南师大附中上学期间及高中毕业以后，从未与其前夫甚至其前夫友好交往过密，既从未有过任何情愫，也鲜少社交往来。
我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了刘凯自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询刘凯自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。我不关心任何有关这个南师大附中85届2班毕业的刘凯的任何事情任何情形。
我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了其他的女人自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询任何其他女人自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。除了我自己的，我不关心任何男人阳具任何女人屁股所牵涉的任何事物包括金钱事物。
南京传言我给了南师大附中高中85届2班的这人那人什么钱，对其他人非常不公平，我方敏声明这是从未发生过的事，我方敏也不知困扰疑问是什么。2004年7月1日那天我所做的金钱安排都有当时的会议记录可供查寻，我现在就是基本上可以很肯定没有做过此种安排。
（----2019年1月22日更新）。
刘凯是南师大附中85届2班的毕业的，据说广播剧曾经报道过她的家庭及婚姻。我是1996年离开中国前，因为1996年南京市药检所的绯闻事件，对于刘凯1996年在事件中立场是强调让大众知情那才是“唯一会爱”我方敏的而很反感，但因即将出国而未采取强硬立场表达我方敏本人态度。2007年我回中国探亲期间，感受到其始终对我方敏保持挺着脖子较劲对着干的态度，我方敏认为没有任何需要也没有任何责任义务和刘凯保持任何联络，2007年离开南京后就再未联络，我今后也永远不会联络。
我是2010年前后才听说我1996年离开中国时，在刘凯以同学名义借给我3000元人民币后，刘凯和傅萍联手将价值5000-6000元人民币的赴美往返飞机票以一万元人民币的价格卖给我，而我本人在1997年年底左右就以1：1.5的比例偿还了刘凯人民币共计4500元。
在2009年，我在美国听说了刘凯可能在南京出车祸的消息，但波士顿华人社区似乎无人听说，我也认为可能消息是假或者她本人安然无恙。现在听说她当时没有出车祸，目前她是和她儿子在美国生活，可能有参与广播剧的制作是我认为造成广播剧情调充斥“你他妈的算老几”，“你说东我就偏要朝西”，“你能有人要就不错了”等等情怀的原因。
听说她本人有再婚，传言很多，我方敏强调我方敏财务独立，和任何有钱男人的财务都无关，也与刘凯现在及今后的可能的生活不可能有任何财务交往。
我方敏所需做的其他相关说明：
1：1996年以前刘凯的家庭生活，她本人和我说的，她母亲的丈夫对她很好，刘凯本人20多岁时婚前婚后都很愿意按照刘凯要求给予经济资助，刘凯结婚所需费用也是由他出资。刘凯家里当时的住所当时是因刘凯母亲单位分房而得，估计是登记在刘凯母亲名下。这基本上就是1996年我在离开药检所之前和别人所说的。
2：刘凯自己的婚姻生活。2007年我回南京探亲，刘凯本人亲自和我谈及，她本人2004年后离婚，其前夫（也是高中同班同学）每月从加拿大支付她所生儿子的生活费用。
----2019年1月21日。
01-20-2019 My money is law matter, never a debatable political matter.（我的遭遇是法律事物而不是政治问题）
I am often asked why I insist on to make my horrible experience a law matter instead of a political matter?
My answer: The difference between law matters and political matters is the same distinctive as the difference between civil law matter and criminal law matter.
My horrible experience is not a political matter but a law matter
1: Because I am not a public official of the United States or of the People's Republic of China, but a commoner citizen in the United States.
2: Because my wealth is not tax-payers' money collected from citizens of the United States or citizens of the People's Republic of China, but my private wealth inherited from my birth grandfathers.
Taking my money is not a civil law matter but a criminal law matter because:
1: There is no argument if I am the sole beneficiary person according to the money-giver's wish.
2: There is no argument if money is lawfully given to me exclusively.
This is precisely the reason I say it has been ridiculous for producing radio program to debate if I could possibly have some money. If I have money is a law matter, never a debatable political matter.
I heard this morning's debate is all about why I should be the one having lawful ownership, which is also never a debatable political matter but a law matter.
----Jan. 20th, 2019
经常有人问我，为什么一定要坚持我的遭遇应该是法律事物而不是政治问题？
我的回答：法律事务和政治问题的区别是很明确的，就像刑法案件和民法纠纷之间的区别一样非常明确。
我的悲惨遭遇是法律事物而不是政治问题，就在于
1：我不是美国或者中国的政府官员，只是美国的一个普通公民。
2：我的财产不是中华人民共和国或者美国的纳税人缴纳的税收而来，我的财产是由继承了亲生爷爷的信托而来的私人财产。
拿走我的钱是刑法案件而非民事纠纷，就在于：
1：我是每一笔钱的给钱者所愿意给钱的唯一受益人，这点是无可争议的。
2：每一笔给我的钱都是合法支付给我一人独自使用的，这点也是无可争议的。
所以我说老在那里辩论来逻辑推理我应不应该有钱，简直是某名奇妙。我是否有钱是法律事务，不是什么可辩论的政治问题。
听说今天早上是在辩论为什么就必须是我的钱？这也是法律问题，不是什么可辩论的政治问题。
----2019年1月20日。
据说一些89年学运在美国的一直很气愤我为什么在2004年取消了他们的工资钱。
我就一直说，我哪有可能取消美国的国会批准给他们的工资钱？那钱是美国国库的开支，就像美国的联邦雇员的工资一样，只有美国的国会可以做决定，州政府的开销及州府雇员的工资只能是由州政府做决定一样，我根本从来就不是美国政府的联邦或者州府官员，那有可能搭界？
就像我的财产是私有财产，美国的国会或者美国的联邦或者州政府官员也不可能决定一样，完全不搭界。
我就是认为他们当时只有三十几岁，都有美国公民身份，也就是再找一份工作做做，没什么了不起的。
2004年以前，我是在美国的私营公司工作，和美国国库的关系就是缴税，对国库的开支等等并不关心，也就是和普通老百姓一样，会为一些传说中的国库的不合理开销而气愤气愤。但当时因为牵涉到的都是一批89年学运人士，很多也就是留学美国的和我前后几届的大学毕业的，所以也没有特别的气愤，就只是觉得他们重新找份工也没什么了不起的。
----2019年1月20日。
01-19-2019 Who should be the one to help me in such a situation? （究竟谁是能帮到我的？）
Heard about curiosity, from a lot of people, who would be responsible to help me out of my current situation.
Law enforcement is the answer, but how? I will explain what I know step by step.
1: If a family has family stories about a possible Trust but nobody informs anyone from the family to inherit it.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation and, if true, will replace entrusting attorney(s), etc. on behave of the beneficiary patron(s), and will ensure newly assigned (by a Judge) entrusting attorney(s) will inform the beneficiary patron(s) of the family to inherit the Trust. But no law enforcing personnel will need to contact the beneficiary family unless for investigation purpose.
Entrusting attorney(s) do not pay out money according to the agreement, law enforcing involvement is similar to this.
2: If similar to my situation, which is I can't receive those on time paid-out from my inherited Trusts.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation upon my complaints, to track down why, and to ensure I can receive the paid-out from my inherited Trusts, but no law enforcing personnel will contact me unless for investigation purpose. All I know would be I will receive letters that include some deposited credit cards, or informing me about my banking access information of how much money. Law enforcing will also ensure I can receive such letter(s) even if I have to change my mailing address for some reasons.
3: If similar to my situation of intellectual incomes, which is I don't know for certain but positive about if I have intellectual income or how much.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation upon my inquiry and, if true, will ensure I receive intellectual income that is evaluated and paid by the rewarding company, but no law enforcing personnel will contact me unless for investigation purpose. All I know would be I will receive an informing letter, or together with a paying check. Law enforcing will also ensure I can receive such letter(s) even if I have to change my mailing address for some reasons.
----Jan. 19th, 2019
很多人很好奇，像我现在这种情况，究竟谁是能帮到我的？
答案是：警方。我会就我所知道的做一步一步的解释。
1：如果家里传下来的故事说是家里老人有财产，或者是办过信托之类的，但没人通知家里任何人继承。
答案：警方接到这类查询投诉，会进行调查，如果属实，警方会代表这家受益人的利益，通过法庭更换信托或财产的受委托律师，再确保由法庭所指定的新的受委托律师通知这家的受益人继承财产。除非有调查取证的需要，否则不会有警方人员和这个家庭的任何联络。
2：如果类似我的情况，也就是收不到已经继承了的信托所支付的金钱给付。
答案：警方接到我的投诉，会进行调查原因，会保证我收到我已经继承了的信托所按时支付的金钱给付，但除非警方人员的调查需要，否则不会有警方人员和我联络。我就只会接到一些信件，每个里面有一张已存入了预定的给付金额的信用卡，或者是如何从某银行提取预定的给付金额的提款信息。警方也会确保我收到这些信件，不管我是否因为某些原因而必须更换收信地址。
3：如果类似我的情况，也就是不太确定但估计应该会有智慧产权收入。
答案：警方接到我的查询投诉，会进行调查，如果属实，警方会确保我收到由智慧专利的奖励公司评估并支付的智慧专利收入，但除非警方人员的调查需要，否则不会有警方人员和我联络。我就是会接到一份通知我有关智慧专利收入的信件，可能在这同一份信里就附了一张支票。警方也会确保我收到这些信件，不管我是否因为某些原因而必须更换收信地址。
----2019年1月19日。
01-18-2019 Weather forecasting style interview to argue about what already happened in the past（以天气预报形式做访谈以预期展望过去早已发生过事件）
Heard about this morning's arguments if I can have money. I heard this is the same 2016 producing team that completely ignored all factual truthful evidence but argued if I could possibly be the creator of Beijing Olympic Gaming Opening Ceremony（2008北京奥运会开幕式创意). Well, it is well known that "logically can't be me" was broadcast as the Chinese Central government's official announcement on the matter despite what the truth is together with factual evidence.
I heard the leader editor is an MBA graduated who obviously knows what is pro forma, predicting, and forecasting. So, this is the radio program interviewing for discussion of the past events using"logical arguments, weather forecasting style to forecast the chance of "what happened in the past" with the possibility presented in percentage. In this year of 2019, they are still predicting if I could possibly have inherited some money already in 2004!!!
据说今天早上又在争辩预报究竟我有没有钱了。据说这就是2016的同一个制作团队，就是那个完全无视事实依据和真相，就只用一些他们自己认为 “逻辑上来说不可能是方敏”的访谈评论和预期，将这些逻辑预期在2016年作为中国中央政府对于我是否是2008北京奥运会创意人的正式声明来播报的同一个制作团队。
我听说主要剪辑是个美国的工商管理硕士毕业的，估计就是因为学过专业的财政预算，经济政策金融风险的预期，以及经营融资收益预报的。所以，就用专业的预测，预算和预期来报道这些过去就已经发生过的种种事件，制作如此专业的“是逻辑类别的争辩，但采用天气预报形式，以事件发生的可能机率，运用预估模式”，对已发生过的事件所进行的时事访谈报道。都已经2019年了，他们还在预期展望我是否有可能早在2004年就已经继承过财产没有。
也就是没话找话，啰里啰唆，广东人说的“口水多过茶”，鲁迅作品里的那个祥林嫂了。
----Jan. 18th, 2019
01-17-2019 Anger featured in "Put the money on the table !" （“把钱放在桌上！” 所表达的愤怒）
Yesterday, I finally understand why the Chinese producing team has featured some stories about Chinese government supported yelling at everybody "put the money on the table".
First, for my blood associated, it means "Put the old man's stuff on the table" to feature my cousins' anger of not familiar with what is a Trust or its legal definition. I heard it has been explained all this time but some of my close cousins are still angry at me for
1) Why insist that my 2004's inheriting was Trust-Inheriting instead of Family Inheriting,
- Answer: Trust-inheriting was the category of my 2004's inheriting, which is according to its legal definition, not upon my insist-on.
- Answer: Because I was specified a sole beneficiary person by the settler of the Trust. So, it was inheriting according to will, not upon my insist-on.
In 1950 or so, newly formed People's Republic of China's government sent a group of armed military personnel to forcefully shut down the Shanghai stock market. Other than with yells of "Put everything on the table and leave", it was reported that the entire process was tense and peaceful but left every investor empty hand with tears.
The misunderstanding was since China re-opened Shanghai Stock Market which enriched a lot of investors through IPO. A lot of Chinese, not just some rich Shanghainese, have started questioning what happened to all those investors money in the 1950's shut down? The question is not about the cash that those investors carry with them but what their stock certificates represented.
Each stock certificate represents an investor's ownership of a company. When those investors at the market left the trading room, they left behind their stock certificates, not the cash value that these stock certificates represented but the share of ownership of the company. Since that day, all market tradable stock certificates became invalid, all those market-traded companies became country-run companies by depositing business profits into the government-anointed bank accounts. The entire time, there was no cash value transacted, but those companies' ownership taken-over by groups of marched-in government employees.
The misunderstanding featured in the radio program was from the anger about who took the cash value of those handed-over stock certificates in 1950 and who has hidden these cash value at where since that day. Well, there is no such cash value at all, it was only companies' management change to deposit business making into bank accounts owned by the country instead of those owned by investors.
昨天，我总算弄清楚了为什么中国广播剧制作团队在中国政府的支持下，会对着所有的人叫唤”把钱放在桌上，让所有人看看清楚1”。
首先，这是在说“把老人留下的东西都放在台面上，让所有人看清楚” 所呈现的是那些和我有血缘关系的人因为不懂什么是信托及其法律条文定义而产生的愤怒。我听说已经是解释了又解释，和我血缘关系近的一些还是一腔的愤怒。
1）我为什么坚持是信托继承而不是在分家产？是否是在掠夺别人的继承权？
- 信托继承是我的2004年继承的法律类别，是由法律条文定义的，不是由我坚持的。所继承财产在信托设立时就已经指定给予了我（家族名字“女掌”)，所以不是掠夺别人的继承权，也不需要将那些信托放在台面上让任何人看清楚。
- 举例：协助设立信托是一个律师事务所的日常法律业务。如果你去一家律师事务所，要求在50年后给予你指定的小孩100万元（连本带息），律师就会要求你在离开律师事务所之前交付100万元的本金，不然律师就不会允许你带走为你所准备的信托文件，否则律师就会因为这一份信托文件而在50年后欠了你所指定的小孩100万元的债务。
- 信托的登记制度也体现了法律对信托受益人利益的保障 (万一委托人或受益人丢失了信托文件）。
- 唯一受益人是由信托的设立委托人在其亲自签名的委托书里所指定的，不是由我自己坚持的。所以是按照遗嘱继承，不是擅自独吞，也不需要将所继承的信托放在台面上让任何人看清楚。
其次，所呈现的是那些和我没有血缘关系的人因为有关1950年关闭上海的股票证卷交易所的一些疑问而产生的愤怒。
1950年左右，新中国的上海市政府派了一队持枪的军人强制关闭了上海的证卷交易所。据报道，除了一些粗暴声音的命令“把随身的东西都放在桌上”，整个过程很紧张但是还算平和，但那些股票投资人离开的时候都是眼含泪水两手空空。
就此关闭过程所引发的一些困扰是在80年代中国重新开放了上海的股票证卷交易所，新股票的上市（IPO）造就了一批又一批的中国富豪。从那时起，不只是一些上海的零星有钱人，而是全国人民都在开始质疑1950年关闭上海股票证卷交易所的时候，究竟哪些被没收的价值连城的股票都是怎么处理的？
每一张股票证书代表的是一个投资人对于一家公司的股份拥有权，拥有一家公司多少百分比的股票，也就是意味着拥有的多少百分比的这家公司。1950年的那天，当那些投资人离开上海的股票证卷交易所时，他们留下的不是这些股票证书的票面上的现金价值，而是这家公司的所有权。从那天起，所有这些公司的股票都作废了，所有这些公司都被充公成为国营企业， 也就是，从第二天起，这些公司被国家工作人员进驻，那些公司企业的利润也不再存入那些投资人自己的银行账号，而是存入由国家财政部财政厅所指定的银行账号。整个过程都没有现金交易，就只有公司被充公。
有关的愤怒就是因为不明白那天所没收的价值连城的股票都被谁给拿走了，又给藏在了哪里。但是那天并没有任何股票被兑现，就只是这些公司被中国政府没收了，公司的经营利润从此归国家所有。
----2019年1月17日。
1950年左右，新中国的上海市政府派了一队持枪的军人强制关闭了上海的证卷交易所。据报道，除了一些粗暴声音的命令“把随身的东西都放在桌上”，整个过程很紧张但是还算平和，但那些股票投资人离开的时候都是眼含泪水两手空空。
就此关闭过程所引发的一些困扰是在80年代中国重新开放了上海的股票证卷交易所，新股票的上市（IPO）造就了一批又一批的中国富豪。从那时起，不只是一些上海的零星有钱人，而是全国人民都在开始质疑1950年关闭上海股票证卷交易所的时候，究竟哪些被没收的价值连城的股票都是怎么处理的？
每一张股票证书代表的是一个投资人对于一家公司的股份拥有权，拥有一家公司多少百分比的股票，也就是意味着拥有的多少百分比的这家公司。1950年的那天，当那些投资人离开上海的股票证卷交易所时，他们留下的不是这些股票证书的票面上的现金价值，而是这家公司的所有权。从那天起，所有这些公司的股票都作废了，所有这些公司都被充公成为国营企业， 也就是，从第二天起，这些公司被国家工作人员进驻，那些公司企业的利润也不再存入那些投资人自己的银行账号，而是存入由国家财政部财政厅所指定的银行账号。整个过程都没有现金交易，就只有公司被充公。
有关的愤怒就是因为不明白那天所没收的价值连城的股票都被谁给拿走了，又给藏在了哪里。但是那天并没有任何股票被兑现，就只是这些公司被中国政府没收了，公司的经营利润从此归国家所有。
----2019年1月17日。
01-16-2019 Same high school producing team ---- today's and 2016's team （南师大附中制作组）
Heard this morning's broadcasting's lead editor was Chinese Propaganda Minister Wang，Yang's daughter or daughter-in-law (据说是汪洋的女儿或者媳妇做的主编剪辑), the entire producing team was associated with the high school I graduated from (南京师范大学附属中学). Participating producers include Fudan University's Business Professor Yan's son (复旦大学经济学院严教授的儿子)。 This Professor Yan is the person that, in a broadcasting a couple months ago, has demanded a "Lee's Family Trust" set up in 1941, to be transferred to him because his grandfather already took and kept the 10,000 Dayang that he was requested to send to this Trust in Hong Kong in 1945 by a rich lady in Shanghai. I heard the propaganda in China has been that I had publicly robbed Professor Yan's family wealth because I inherited this Trust in 2004 as the sole beneficiary great-granddaughter that was specified by the settler (my great-grandmother, the one who raised my father under her own roof, and also the one who was the next door neighbour to my grandparents' family). I heard this "Lee's Family Trust" was sized 60,000 Dayang in 1941.
I was harassed by local same high school "harassing team" so that I did not hear what was broadcasted this morning, but I heard the style is the same as 2016's Chinese producing team, which is using one different voice to read one differ scripted line to make-up a featured story that absolutely has nothing to do with the featured person in the story, but each scripted line is read by a person who is reading this person's own situation of the moment to fit this style in a "reality show eligible". This team's such producing efforts is the reason I accused Chines government intentionally blackmailed to threat and to demand money. （制作风格就是编纂剧本后，由演员一人读一句，而每人读的那一句台词也很符合该演员的“朗读时刻”时的真实生活实情，但整个编纂后由朗读而成的广播剧故事却与所讲述的该故事的主要人物没有任何一点关系。据说这是中国制作团队所能够理解的什么是“真实剧”。而我本人就一直因为这种编纂而成的“假真实”而自2016年起就一直指责中国政府是故意抹黑造谣以制造事件实施敲诈绑架勒索财物。据说国内的宣传基调自2016年起就和广播剧的2016年制作基调始终保持一致。）
I heard this producing team has the understanding this is lawful because this is how British Royals blackmailed my name through patched-up some so stuck-on so unwanted stories, obviously, Chinese Foreign Department has not informed them that British Royals and media have already revealed the real European female featured in those stories in 2017 to clarify the matter. （我听说制作团队认为这是国外的通行做法，英国王室就是这么编了一个故事痛骂我方敏是个没人要的烂货的呀。很明显，中国外交部还没有通知他们，英国王室及各国媒体早在2017年就已经在整个欧洲，美洲，大洋洲，亚洲，中东各地区揭示了那些故事中的一个真实的欧洲女性以澄清事件。）
----Jan. 16th, 2019
能够想像，如果我有钱，作为同是南师大附中毕业的其他人，会希望有个什么可帮助的资源，比如说海外留学的助学金之类的。可我听说的，南师大附中毕业的，和中国外交部的抱怨类似，就没人认为区区一点海外留学的助学金是够胃口的，想要的，是海外生活终身所需的供养，至少每年几万美金或者几十万美金，再加房子或者豪宅，甚至必须是海外超级富豪级别的生活水准。所以，只要听说是我的钱就必须全部拿光，否则根本不够。
我听说的，这拿钱活动，根本就不需要我本人同意或者听说或者知道，他们就是直接通过在银行，公司，或者政府机关之类的找个工作，只要听说有可能是我的钱，虽然根本就不在我的名下，而是很明确地在别人名下，他们照样就直接从公司呆账里或者银行里拿钱，弄到海外一片惊恐，人人自危。以前，要是听说有人居然作为银行工作人员，直接在银行里把别人户头的钱先挪后转，就转账到那人自己账户名下，作为老百姓，根本就不会听，因为美国是个法治国家，哪里会有这种做事情，现在态度是，只要听说就赶紧报警，万一警察还没听说。据说南师大附中相关的，参与类似活动的人员很多很广。
我听说的，这拿钱活动，根本就不需要我本人同意或者听说或者知道，他们就是直接通过在银行，公司，或者政府机关之类的找个工作，只要听说有可能是我的钱，虽然根本就不在我的名下，而是很明确地在别人名下，他们照样就直接从公司呆账里或者银行里拿钱，弄到海外一片惊恐，人人自危。以前，要是听说有人居然作为银行工作人员，直接在银行里把别人户头的钱先挪后转，就转账到那人自己账户名下，作为老百姓，根本就不会听，因为美国是个法治国家，哪里会有这种做事情，现在态度是，只要听说就赶紧报警，万一警察还没听说。据说南师大附中相关的，参与类似活动的人员很多很广。
还有一个矛盾焦点就是我的广播剧收入。我听说美国的广播公司已经特意解释了，我的主要角色收入是完全按照美国相关法律的规定而决定的提成分配比例，我听说在中国也有类似的行规方式决定的提成分配比例，从来不是中国根本就没听说过类似的提成分配。电视剧主角和主要配角，以及跑龙套的，就是类似有主角的工资再加电视剧集销售的百分比提成，主要配角的工资（或有或没有的百分比提成），以及跑龙套的就只有每集参与才有的那种台湾人所俗称的车马费。我听说的南师大附中相关人员的最大投诉就是，他们不愿意作为某一些剧集的录制参与人员也就是类似跑龙套的参与程度，就只拿车马费，而是只要参与就必须提领主角级别的广播剧销售收入提成。估计要是不能从广播公司拿，他们就特别委屈所以就直接从银行里或者其他公司呆帐里拿，胃口大的实在是某明奇妙，贪得不得了，吓死人。
----2019年1月16日。
01-15-2019 Do I have Trust Inheriting? （我是否有继承信托？）
Heard this morning's saying about my intellectual incomes.
My answer: I can't wait to receive them.
I heard if safe for me to possess money in my own name has been the concern, I say now is much improved that I am no longer concerned if my mailbox or my apartment can be opened forcefully but so comfortably right in front of me or my neighbors. So, I am safe as my neighbors now, to receive checks or inquiry letters, and to have some cash in my apartment.
----Jan. 15th, 2019
Heard the Chinese community's anger is still if I have inherited money or financially independent.
My answer: I heard JD has announced Trust registration information can be verified for my most recent 5 generations' grandfathers'. I heard some Chinese angry that all are partial information that does not include current bank accounts information nor current investing activities.
Being the sole beneficiary person of all those Trusts, I state it is not necessary for anyone to know any current financial information of any of those Trusts, as long as it is verifiable that I am the sole beneficiary person and my Trust inheriting are both factual truths.
I heard the prints do not look professionally formal is the reason for the doubts if this is a piece of joky information. I say it is the original print0format from (possibly) a UNIX computer system which is authentic original print-out information. （听说中国政府机关有向美国司法部查询所公布的信托信息，但怀疑所提供的打印件是否不正式不正规而是在开玩笑。我估计那是电脑一种大机器系统的原始记录的打印格式就是这种样子的。这种电脑系统不是适合个人使用的视窗系统，但也是电脑系统，适合大规模资料贮存，多用于大机构大公司，是否如此应该可以通过中国国内的电脑系统核实的。）
I heard following are included in the information, together with me being the sole beneficiary person and in which year. These three generation grandfathers were the three-generation donators of Chinese colleges in the Republic China time.（ 台湾应该有方治兴，方励其和方智仁是三代祖父子关系的户籍登记资料，中国大陆有方智仁和我的祖父孙女关系的户籍登记记录，我继承的是他们为我所设立的信托）
My grandfather Fang, Zhiren (祖父方智仁，1965年去世） $15M美金 (exchange rate 1:$3)
My great-grandfather Fang, Liqi（曾祖父方励其(第七子），1930年去世）$11M美金 (exchange rate 1:$1)
My great-great-grandfather Fang, Zhixin （曾曾祖父方治兴，1907-1911年左右去世) $15M美金 (exchange rate 1:$1)
...
----Jan. 15th, 2019
01-14-2019 Who is doing the propaganda that I should be evicted from the U.S. if I dare to complain about public service?
What I have complained about public service? and Why?
I heard, to the government sector of the Boston city and Massachusetts state, "who is the wife to a Ford" is the critical decision factor to the matter if I could possibly have inherited Trusts from my own birth family, or if I am allowed to have my own making to be owned by myself. I heard it is the same critically important in government sector in China as well. Why???
I heard it has been very confusing who is the real authentic wife to a Ford, a Chinese Miss Zhu or an American (Miss) Juliet, but no matter how confusing it might be, why my own birth Chinese grandfathers' money I inherited or my own making should be whoever's to take in the United States or in the People's Republic of China? and why this taking over without authorization has been supported by some government employees? And why shouldn't I complain about public service from the government sector because of my such severely impacted unhappy experiences?
This morning, I was asking my own attorneys through the recording to my own smartphone about why I can't receive my $400Million yearly providing. I heard rumors that TS announced each $400Million for all five years has been clarified my lawful money verified and transmitted into 5 of my banking estate accounts which mean each bank account should use my name(pseudo or real) listed as owner of the account, I was never asked to provide my own banking information but I have the direct express card. And I heard there was another TS announcement a couple of months later that I (not specifically spelled, so, possibly me) may never get any of these $400Million per year but paid service-fee for each year can be returned or given to me, which means after losing each $400 Million a year, TS can return 400,000 per month service fee. I heard the service fee charged by TS is supposed to be 5% at least, and I heard there is some extra donation to TS that is matched and beyond the difference, well, I assume that is implied as won't be returned because that is a donation.
Some said as long as the money is from some foreign investors, the U.S. certainly can understand this is beneficial to the U.S. How? when I am a U.S. citizen? when the paying money is from these U.S. companies local business profiting? So, some U.S. money that is hard earned by some U.S. companies which should be given to a U.S. citizen has got lost in the U.S., even though it is according to some foreigners' instruction, why this can be understood as beneficial to the U.S.? How this logic can be understood?
I was asking my attorneys exactly what is going on and gets agitated because I just can't get expected money while it seems everyone in Boston including MA government sectors keep saying impatiently"You don't have any money because Rockefellers already said so loudly, you are not associated is loudly from Fords as well.", so, I heard this question "why don't you evict yourself from the United States if you don't like this government?" Am I the one being ridiculous?
I did complaint about Rockefellers regarding their possible involvement of inappropriateness. I heard R claimed this is hostility, I complained why they took my money and claimed I have no money as if I have ever lived on their money? As long as it can be certain I did not claim their money, even though Rockefellers may not know if I am lawful to claim I inherited money from my own birth Chinese grandfathers, my own making from radio program broadcasting should be easy to be understood as my own lawful making, right? R took every penny of my making from the radio program broadcasting.
I heard that saying it is understood that even though it has been all about my life experiences, but the radio program's success is all because of Rockefellers' name, or Fords' name. So, I have to ask why they can have this assumption about their own importance if none of them is a pathetic psycho? When everyone in the U.S. already heard the truth of their real romances, and when whoever in the entire world that heard of their names also heard so many rumors about their true romances already, Why would anyone only listen to the radio program because of their huge importance would waste their time to listen to those fake romance stories, even though it was only a couple of months for each of the two important names while the successful broadcasting was over 10 years?
The following has been my statement since June 30th of 2004. It is not hard at all for Rockefellers or Fords, or Waltons, to verify all these money is never owned by any of them, right? The same with Ford's association, it should \not be hard to verify that my inheriting is not associated with the truth if I have ever been associated with any Ford, right?
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth. My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
----Jan. 7th, 2019
----Jan. 14th, 2019
I heard this article pissed off everybody, well, I don't live on their money certainly means I speak up comfortably if they pissed me off.
----Jan. 14th, 2019
01-12-2019 Knit-top incident in UB in 1998 (硚口大学的不雅衣服事件）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting, it seems still very confusing. So, I just keep these statements here.
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth. My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
----Jan. 7th, 2019
Heard it is clarified “the same person" in the rumor is never her husband, never her romantic partner, etc., No contact with her since 1999, know nothing about her romance.
----Jan. 8th, 2019
Heard my casual dress incident in the University of Bridgeport on a 1998's Sunday has been a wildfire rumor in the Chinese community. Exactly, what was the story?
I was in a weekend computer science program in Springfield campus of the University of Bridgeport in the summer of 1998. As usual, I woke up at 7AM after an 11-hours weekday shift in a Chinese restaurant to catch the commuter train to school, well, it was summer, what I grabbed from my trunk was a normal knit-top that I put on without a Virginia Secret nor its equivalent underneath. I was not harassed at all on the train, in the classroom, and on my way home, but I did notice the insides could be seen if I stand straight during the lunch hour. This was rumored the famous indecent dress story in school.
I was lucky to be my carefree character to live in the United States that only police officers cared if it was appropriate even if I was completely without my entire knit-top, but I was not carefree about the dress code but carefree about what I can put on. I once joked that I possibly can be a pioneer for an exotic style dress as long as that is my taste of exotic but not the exposure.
I heard this incident has a wildfire sex-offender equivalent rumor since 2004, maybe because I was with class 4 at the time, which this entire confusion of "who is who and what is what" originated.
----Jan. 12th, 2019
有关硚口大学的”1998年的不雅衣服事件”，就是一件普通的针织短袖上衣，空心穿着，衣服有点小所以穿着有点紧绷了。当时我还是在硚口大学的四班上课，当时硚口大学春田分校的华人学生也大都是居住在纽约及新泽西州的，应该很了解我那天的衣着在美国，至少是美国的东部地区，根本也没什么了不起的，就是华人看着有点突兀而已，其它什么的，性疯狂啦，暴露狂啦，淫妇想勾引啦等等就一点都谈不上了。
听说89年学运是我在硚口大学上学时穿了一件”不雅衣服事件”的主要传播者（纽约新泽西确实有大批的89年学运），据说这届中国政府都是89年学运的同情者也是我被中国政府痛打的原因。我听说是因为我方敏老是用中华人民共和国的口气发表言论，让89年学运很气愤。
我方敏的回应：我从2004年起就一直强调我是方敏，我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，我所发表的言论都是以方敏名义发表，也从未回避我方敏就是唐太宗李世民的继承人，可方敏或者唐太宗这两个名字都不是中华人民共和国的名称标识啊？为什么说我以方敏名义所发表言论就是在以中华人民共和国名义表达立场？
有关”89年的时候也是如此“论点，我想请问89年学运:
1：请问你们是否认可当时的中共中央及中央军委对中国960万平方公里土地拥有合法领导权？
2：请问你们是否认可89年清理天安门广场的军事行动是由中共中央政府授权的合法管理行为？
3：请问你们是否认可我方敏作为在校学生，有法律权利及自由向当时的中共中央政府畅谈我对89年学运的想法？
4：30年后的2019年，请问你们是以什么样的阅历经历，认为当时的中国政府是管理过当而且这份过当是由我方敏造成的？请提出或理论或事实做为依据，而非只是一味空空洞洞的指责指控？
----2019年1月12日。
01-07-2019 Bridgeport University Graduated Chinese Mrs. Ford, whom? maiden name is Zhu Hongqing （真正的福特夫人其实是北京医学院药学系1990届的朱红箐？）
Big news:
To all University of Bridgeport's insider-alumni: This is no big secret anymore!!!!
（Heard it is clarified “the same person" in the rumor is never her husband, never her romantic partner, etc., No contact with her since 1999, know nothing about her romance. ----updated on Jan. 8th, 2019)
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.
My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
请告知所有知情的中华人民共和国中共中央政治局, 中国外交部，中共中央宣传部，中共中央军委，中国文化部：这已经不再是天大的秘密了。
请告知所有上海医科大学的知情校友：这已经不再是天大的秘密了。
（听说查过了，传说中的“同一个人”从来不是女方的丈夫或者女方的恋爱男朋友之类的。久未联络，真是完全不知女方的婚恋情况。----2019年1月8日）
(听说女方和南京的华姓是三等亲关系。很烦，女的自己弄不清谁是丈夫，什么钱是夫家钱，可是只要做丈夫的还没继承财产，也应该是由弄得清什么是自家钱，什么不是自家钱的公公婆婆处理啊，哪里需要做儿媳妇的满大街只要是钱就说是她自己夫家钱了。----2019年1月11日）
1: Heard a Chinese female from the same class in the same year that I graduated from University Bridgeport married "Charles Ford". The Chinese female is, rumored, a father-side fourth cousin to Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, and a father-side first cousin to the famous denounced descendent of Ming dynasty Emperor, a Mr. Zhu from Chinese Military. (Never a typo but a rumor with a long-time joke who has the correct family name)
2: Heard this is the Chinese female who lived near 82nd street in Queens in 1997 who graduated in 1990 from the Beijing Medical University's School of Pharmacy, her maid named is Zhu, Hongqing.（据说是北京医学院（北京协和医学院？）药学系90届的朱红罄(?). I graduated from Shanghai Medical University's Pharmacy School in 1990.
3: Rumored there was a special open to the public wedding reception(?) in 2011 in Shanghai, China, and it was rumored an open to public reception because both had no Shanghai local association at the time.
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.
My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
4: Rumored this "Charles Ford" is the person visited University Bridgeport's 2000 commencement and recognized by the same Chinese female at the moment.
- I was the person never heard of such incident from the same commencement, from the fourth class nor from the fifth or sixth, until it was broadcasted is a true statement.
- I have no association with the entire 4th class of UB's Springfield campus weekend program since 1999 is a True statement. I registered my remaining courses with the 5th or 6th class from the same program.
- The incidence I was blocked is a true report, and I was not with the graduating students during the entire commencement is a true statement.
- So, I know nothing about what happened during the UB's 2000 commencement is a True statement.
5: Rumored this is the person who visited Jennifer's apartment at 140 E46 street in October of 1996 and the same person broadcasted on the radio.
6: Heard this "Charles Ford" is not biologically associated with any of my possible biological birth child(ren) from pregnancy mother(s)' help.
7: My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.
My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
----January 7th, 2019
这个婚姻据说2007年就已经在纽约注册，一直都是纽约市的婚姻记录上的有效婚姻，就是从未在福特企业公开，也从未在华人圈子里公开，就是有一堆一堆知道此内情的人在我周围活动，不知为什么。
还有，2004年7月1日我开电讯会议那天，那女的也在场，据说那女的和别人说：又没人知道是谁在继承财产，怎么就不可能是她呐？她的父亲好像是中国宣传部的，这次广播剧上中国政府的高调痛打就是中国宣传部牵头的，在国内也是同样的宣传基调。
很奇怪的，中共中央宣传部国内国外的宣传基调：中国政府一副腔调好像我欠了中国政府什么大钱了，不是撒谎其实根本没钱，就是如果真有钱就必须把钱拿出来，不给就是不行；福特家就是一堆女人在花枝招展的表达强悍，是真正的了不起，真正的很能干；洛克菲勒家的就是气势汹汹的强调只要我有钱就只能是偷了他们家的财产。
有人一直问我，为什么就只痛骂中国政府，那你们看看这三拨人，我最应该骂谁？福特家莺歌燕舞的出现，除非我真的是弄不清谁是谁了，否则我骂她们干嘛呀？洛克菲勒家的，我就是一直吵一个电话都没打过，那有可能花到洛家的钱？那你们听听中国政府的气势，我还会怎么处理？
如果认为我有钱就只能是洛克菲勒家给的裤裆钱，为什么福特家的老婆就是够资格抢啊？不是据说已经就是最富的那个福特了吗？我是一直奇怪，我要是和福特家的人已经生了孩子，怎么各个都认定洛克菲勒家的那个就是一定要大把给我钱花，还拒不承认，居然公开撒谎说从没给过我钱？据说南师大附中毕业的，就是认为只要是我的钱就只能是洛克菲勒家的这人给的，所以各个南师大附中毕业的，都可以直接从银行里提领就可以，洛克菲勒家是不会过问的。据说银行里任何户头任何人名下的钱都有可能是我的钱，也就是说只要是钱，南师大附中的就可以直接从银行里拿，也是吓死人的传言。
听听就知道今天早上的英文博客为什么这么写了：前一阵子，据说和我在波城生活密切相关的一个什么机构，整个一个电脑信息中心或电脑房，整个部门一共就8个人，一个是南师大附中毕业的，7个是桥口大学毕业的。吓坏所有人。我经常去的图书馆，据说电脑房也是有几个是桥口大学毕业的。我是在麻州的波士顿哎，有名的大学城。怎么都是康州我以前读电脑的这个大学毕业的，这个大学离波士顿有2个小时以上的车程呐？就我现在的住处，出门一条小路，小路左边和小路右边的两个邻居就是两个名校，还都有电脑专业。真是不知道还有多少类似传言，真是能吓死人。那个女的，就是福特老婆，就是和我在这个硚口大学同一个班级里学电脑的，她是北京一个医学院的药学系的，我是上海的，她和我是同年毕业的，但她不是药理专业。
----2019年1月7日。
6: Heard this "Charles Ford" is not biologically associated with any of my possible biological birth child(ren) from pregnancy mother(s)' help.
7: My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.
My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.
----January 7th, 2019
这个婚姻据说2007年就已经在纽约注册，一直都是纽约市的婚姻记录上的有效婚姻，就是从未在福特企业公开，也从未在华人圈子里公开，就是有一堆一堆知道此内情的人在我周围活动，不知为什么。
还有，2004年7月1日我开电讯会议那天，那女的也在场，据说那女的和别人说：又没人知道是谁在继承财产，怎么就不可能是她呐？她的父亲好像是中国宣传部的，这次广播剧上中国政府的高调痛打就是中国宣传部牵头的，在国内也是同样的宣传基调。
很奇怪的，中共中央宣传部国内国外的宣传基调：中国政府一副腔调好像我欠了中国政府什么大钱了，不是撒谎其实根本没钱，就是如果真有钱就必须把钱拿出来，不给就是不行；福特家就是一堆女人在花枝招展的表达强悍，是真正的了不起，真正的很能干；洛克菲勒家的就是气势汹汹的强调只要我有钱就只能是偷了他们家的财产。
有人一直问我，为什么就只痛骂中国政府，那你们看看这三拨人，我最应该骂谁？福特家莺歌燕舞的出现，除非我真的是弄不清谁是谁了，否则我骂她们干嘛呀？洛克菲勒家的，我就是一直吵一个电话都没打过，那有可能花到洛家的钱？那你们听听中国政府的气势，我还会怎么处理？
如果认为我有钱就只能是洛克菲勒家给的裤裆钱，为什么福特家的老婆就是够资格抢啊？不是据说已经就是最富的那个福特了吗？我是一直奇怪，我要是和福特家的人已经生了孩子，怎么各个都认定洛克菲勒家的那个就是一定要大把给我钱花，还拒不承认，居然公开撒谎说从没给过我钱？据说南师大附中毕业的，就是认为只要是我的钱就只能是洛克菲勒家的这人给的，所以各个南师大附中毕业的，都可以直接从银行里提领就可以，洛克菲勒家是不会过问的。据说银行里任何户头任何人名下的钱都有可能是我的钱，也就是说只要是钱，南师大附中的就可以直接从银行里拿，也是吓死人的传言。
听听就知道今天早上的英文博客为什么这么写了：前一阵子，据说和我在波城生活密切相关的一个什么机构，整个一个电脑信息中心或电脑房，整个部门一共就8个人，一个是南师大附中毕业的，7个是桥口大学毕业的。吓坏所有人。我经常去的图书馆，据说电脑房也是有几个是桥口大学毕业的。我是在麻州的波士顿哎，有名的大学城。怎么都是康州我以前读电脑的这个大学毕业的，这个大学离波士顿有2个小时以上的车程呐？就我现在的住处，出门一条小路，小路左边和小路右边的两个邻居就是两个名校，还都有电脑专业。真是不知道还有多少类似传言，真是能吓死人。那个女的，就是福特老婆，就是和我在这个硚口大学同一个班级里学电脑的，她是北京一个医学院的药学系的，我是上海的，她和我是同年毕业的，但她不是药理专业。
01-06-2019 和南京方面的矛盾(8) --
《Two hundred years punishment 王博真夫妻及王家要求》
Heard this morning's broadcasting about 200 years' in-prison time.
I heard this is the law item applicable to anyone who seriously intends to own a company illegally.
Why I am not concerned? Because I am lawfully inherited some Trusts that have been investing in some companies is the reason that I am expecting to receive my living expenses that already paid-out by those companies as their investor, which means it is so clear that I never have any intention to own those companies illegally.
Those payments I have been expecting are all paid-out according to each of those companies lawfully registered investor's instruction, and all those instructing investors have not changed their investment share in each of those paying companies entire upstream investing chain for over accumulated 600 years is the reason that I claim I am never provided for by any rich male but Trusts set up by my own ancient birth grandfathers.
By the way, I was asked where this radio program has been broadcasting? I heard it has been tour-broadcasting, similar to what is commonly known for concerts but on radios.
----Jan. 6th, 2019
南京方面说我家一直是由王博真夫妻一家资助生活的，谁说的？
我的回应：王博真1990退休前江苏省人民医院的退休护士（不是护士长），她丈夫苏家隆是1956年左右就因病退休的中学老师，他们家是在1982年就领养了王淑秋作为他们自己的孩子。他们家的经济情况就可以凭中国的工资标准判定了。
我母亲高中毕业后做出纳，1980年代后才升为初级会计，1988年失去南京市汽车运输公司的正式工作，无退休金。我父亲是南京大学毕业的，1992-1993年退休前是中国科学院紫金山天文台的研究编辑人员，我是1990年大学毕业，1996年离开中国来美，我们家的经济情况也应该可以从中国的工资标准判定，请问我们家为何需要由王博真夫妻两个资助才能吃口饱饭？
我母亲确实是因为王博真才有了机会离开山东老家，但我母亲所有的兄弟姊妹当中，只有我母亲是必须做所有家务包括力所不能及的，才有可能留在南京而不被赶回山东老家，这是我母亲对于王淑秋确实是一个被领养的女儿待遇而一直耿耿于怀的原因。
所有的矛盾就在这里，是谁在坚持说我们家亏欠了王博真夫妻两个的抚养费用？我们家里谁需要他们出资抚养？我们家的气愤就是从没要求过，就送来好一大包的厕所草纸（省一点是一点)，还带着血迹的医院都已经不再使用的床单(垫在褥子下面总是可以暖和点），生了蛆的泡菜（好好煮煮还是可以省点菜钱的）。。。我们家是谢谢真心的好意不抱怨什么，怎么就成了我们家欠了他们的生活费了？给我的压岁钱，也就是我母亲的兄弟姊妹也给的出手，我大学毕业后一年会有两至三次每次几十元的零花钱，去了会有好吃的（也就是愿意拿出来招待我这个客人的），但怎么就成了我们家欠了他们一家生活费了？
在我母亲所有的兄弟姊妹当中，只有我们家被要求必须永远记得我母亲当年是如何离开山东老家的，我还必须不要自己的母亲王博贤而把王博真一家当自己亲娘，是谁这么花痴? 是谁认定了就只需坚决不准我有就会“抢了”王博真家的任何东西，王家人再齐心坚决痛骂我亲妈王博贤是个婊子，一齐栽赃说我是苏家隆下的种，就这么着，就可以让王博真成了亲娘待遇了？我方敏坚决拒绝。
还有，一口一声的，如果我方敏敢不按要求给钱，就让全世界都看着王家上下，齐声为王博真不能拥有亲娘待遇而痛哭而悲壮，看谁还会愿意做方敏的朋友？我方敏态度，我方敏立场就是，投诉这分明是在恐吓威胁以实施敲诈勒索。你们可以听听，王家上下，提的都是什么要求？表达的都是什么愤怒？都是为什么原因在悲壮着？
我听到的，就是我（婚姻）家，王家人必须想来就来，而且是如果我的婚床实在不能上去躺躺（不是肮脏的躺法），那我的卧室隔壁就必须放张床给他们；我（婚姻）家的东西，王家必须够资格捡好的拿。。我方敏态度，王博真自己很分得清谁是她自己的家里人，我方敏也分得很清楚，所以我方敏坚决拒绝这种过分的要求，我方敏坚决拒绝任何类似过分的要求。
不管王家及其所有亲朋如何诅咒我方敏断子绝孙，我方敏坚决拒绝领养王博真苏家隆的（领养）女儿王（苏）淑秋所育小孩，我方敏坚决拒绝领养王家及王家所有亲朋的任何小孩，我方敏坚决拒绝领养方家及方家所有亲朋的任何小孩。
我方敏拒绝领养任何非我方敏本人所亲生的子女*。
*听说，在美国，经代理孕母协助所生的亲生子女，也需要经过法律上的领养手续才可以建立父母子女法律关系。
----2019年1月6日。
01-04-2019 我的亲朋送礼计划 (14) ---- My online gifting idea --
《Commercial Registry & Ownership Confusion, Trust Registry& Sole Beneficiary》
I heard it is broadcasted "(The paid-out radio company's major featured person fee is) not your income" this morning, I heard it was not from the paying radio company but from a representative of a company that is set up by the person who deposited some portion of this money to own. I already asked laws help on why I have not received this paid-out-to-me money yet.
----Jan. 4th, 2019
I was asked what is the commercial registry, and what is the company(corporate) law?
My response:
An example: If you intend to open a coffee shop, the first permission you will seek is the commercial registry, and then the IRS' tax-id, and you need both commercial registration certificate and tax-id to apply for the health department's permission.
The commercial registration certificate is the government's record of this coffee shop's ownership, the commercial registry related laws are all about this coffee shop's ownership. The corporate (company) laws are about how to operate this coffee shop.
I think in the United States, because the land of North America was a colony to UK and France, etc. before its 1776's independence, so that commercial registries for all those companies operating on this North America soil before 1776 were in each of these countries' general consulate (convoy), but must have been re-registered in the United States commercial department(?) since 1776 when the U.S. established its own commercial registry laws. So, it is correct to say commercial registry laws has a history for over 400 years in North America.
I heard a lot of annoyances expressed against me keep saying I have inherited money, I don't consider speaking up my true inheriting experience inappropriate at all in the U.S., plus, with law enforcement's help, it can be verified if I am provided for by these paying companies even I haven't received anything yet, and please correct me in an email if your verification proves that inaccuracy in my blog articles is beyond informational purpose.
So, I am asking if these annoyances are because of those American companies' ownership confusion?I am a beneficiary person of some Trusts that have been investing these American companies through its at least 6 countries away upstream investor, so please direct your ownership-confusion to your concerning company directly, and I think lawful ownership commercial registry record can be verified from government's record as well. Thanks.
----Jan. 4th, 2019
Heard annoying rumors of promises to don't ever let me have my money.
My response: What these rumored promises mean in the U.S? First of all, this is a crime of discrimination against me.
Promise never to let laws prevail? What kind of rumor is this? This promise means the promising person's police badge would be taken off (badge-off) immediately in the U.S. In the young United States time, a police badge means sincere sworn to protect and to enforce, that those police officers stories have been all over cowboy-movies to praise how bravely they were to face challenges of loaded guns. Don't ever consider this kind of promises a joke to a law enforcing personnel or any government employee in the U.S.
----Jan. 4th, 2019
What is Trust Registry and Sole Beneficiary Person? 什么是信托登记和信托的唯一收益人
My answer: Trust Registry is the record of a Trust which records who is the settler, who is(are) this Trust's settler's specified beneficiary person(s), who is(are) this Trust's entrusting attorney(s), and how much money has been entrusted by this Trust's settler, etc. 信托登记是一个信托的登记记录，记录内容包括信托的设立人，信托设立人所指定的受益人，信托的受委托律师，以及所信托的财产有多少，等等。
If this Trust's settler has only specified one person to receive all of the entrusted money of this Trust, this one person is the sole beneficiary person of this Trust. 如果一个信托的设立人只指定了一个人接受所信托的所有财产，这一个人就被称为唯一受益人。
Please consult the attorney of your own if you are concerned about being a co-beneficiary person of any Trust I inherited. I heard the most recent 5 generation's grandfathers' Trusts have registry record verified that I am the sole beneficiary person of all five. And, I don't think anyone can be a beneficiary person specified in the same Trust with me when birthmark is how I was specified.如果你对你自己是否有可能也是我所继承的信托的受益人，请咨询你自己的律师。我听说最近代的五代爷爷给我的信托等级都已经核实过了，我确实是这五代爷爷所设立信托的唯一受益人。而且，我也不认为胎记掌纹是指定我是受益人的情况下，也不可能需要让我和其他人共一个信托（因为爷爷在当年就可以从一开始就可以把钱分开，就可以分别给，再分别信托给同一个律师或者不同律师就可以，也就是多写一张信托委托书而已）。
----Jan. 4th, 2019
01-03-2019 the U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus is not from my money
Heard this morning's broadcasting of U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus.
My response: I don't know yet why it is so confused to be associated with my money. I heard it is not some intellectual income nor any paid-out for my exclusive usage money. So, I know that is definitely not my money
I only have two sources of cash-money, intellectual incomes, and paid-out living expenses. My inherited Trusts are in-entrusting which means all payments are strictly followed what was decided on July 1st of 2004's entrusting teleconference, and not easy for myself as the sole beneficiary person to increase the decided amount of each's yearly payment. So, the U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus is nothing to do with me money.
Remember the pattern whoever's changed heart is so confusing if associated with me? Is this seems the same pattern about whoever's money now? Is this to arouse anger how dare TS employees to take whoever's lawful money? Or to confuse the public if I possibly have any lawful money? Is this the same expectation as all those confused romances broadcasting?
Also, I heard about rumored IRS internal broadcasting of the statement "known reason for income-depositing substitution & unchangeable permanently" without any further explanations. So, I asked this question to the laws: why being the person most impacted by this intellectual-income depositing substitution, I am not part of the informed group even after I filed complaints about this substituting my name titled on the check when depositing? Why the lawful ownership of some money can be so confusing in the media industry?
----Jan. 3rd, 2019
I heard the saying how I speak up on the Boston radio can actually get myself some money and change the ownership of an American company that has been historically owned by O'Connors?
I have explained this already that no lawful-ownership has ever changed no matter how long O'Connor have been confused, or how loudly I spoke my side stories. The confused company still owned by its historically lawfully registered owner which is that American company's British investor-company for over 400 years.
I heard: O'Connors have been confused because of their family's over 50 years hard savings. Their two generation stubborn grandfathers insisted on to invest in this not-for-sell American company by refusing to take salary payments or by refusing to sign the salary-receipts of each's 6-months-salaries per year for over 50 years. These two generations of O'Connors' families lived on thrift half-salary for over 50 years has been the reason for their confusion and all their anger in their yearly meeting with the American company. The arguments have been "We are the investors" from O'Connors replied with "This is the company never for sale" from the American company; and "Why you took the money" from the O'Connors replied with "Because you refused to sign the salary receipts" from the American company. I heard all these 50 years salaries had been saved in the bank, and all the savings had given to the O'Connor family with the first installment of their agreed upon providing from the American company.
I was confused because everybody says O'Connor families own the 100% of the American company I thought I inherited in 2004, my anxiety was where would be my inherited share if so? It turned out what I inherited is a Trust that has been investing for centuries in this American company through its upstream investors. The company I confused is this American company's American investor-company. My expected money is the yearly providing from the Trust I inherited in 2004 as its sole beneficiary person. I have not received the expected money because of all these confusion.
Why the government didn't stop both parties real owning efforts on the media? I assume because nobody knew which American company I was confused but my inheriting experience in 2004 is real, or this assumption is applicable to both parties? Both parties stopped arguing after this American company's British investor-company explained about this American company's investing history and about my expected paid-out-already is upon its upstream investor's instruction.
The media can certainly verify the commercial registry record of this American company's ownership which should have not been changed by all these confusion.
----Jan. 3rd, 2019
I was asked why I haven't say Merry Christmas or Happy New Year to my biological children? Currently, I am eligible to choose to protect their privacy over my needed public explanation. Currently, in their associated matters, it is very clear that they do have a resourceful mother who can protect them no matter how confusing it can be about if they have a father care about them at all.
----Jan. 3rd, 2019
01-02-2019 About my lawful investor income tax rate
I heard my yesterday's blog aroused a lot of curiosity if the validation is needed. My understanding was if that was because the commercial registry law has been around for about 400 years in history (600 years in my previous blog article is the years has been in the same dynasty), but my grandfather's Trust, that I am the sole beneficiary person of, was set up 800-1300 years ago. I heard it is concluded that "the validation for that 600-800 years' investor-ownership is not necessary", because my ancient family portraits and other hard factual evidence already made up that 600-800 years historical gap. So, I heard it is announced this morning that, it is concluded that all five years'(2015-2019) all providing-payments are lawful payments qualified for investor income tax rate.
I heard this lawful investor-ownership was announced with a "so-annoying" tone, I understand it is from the annoyingness that I was never the person who contributed to any of these companies great history. I respect this is a true statement and I respect all those contributions. I am willing to contribute to the futures of these companies and I already have started such efforts since 2004.
----January 2nd, 2019
I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
- The first year's settler was Tang dynasty's Emperor Xuanzong（唐玄宗李隆基), at about 1300 years ago. The known heir of the Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong(唐太宗李世民), both featured in those published paintings which were copies from the digital version of those original ancient family portraits.
- The second year's settler was painter Zhang, Guotao（国画大师张国焘), at about 800 years ago. He was a famous painter in China, one of whose paintings was discovered with the royal collection stamp that cost all his non-heir children been prosecuted by the Emperor of the Song dynasty. I heard this painter's private (royal) collection stamp is identified as the same or characteristically same to the royal collection stamps from the Chinese Tang dynasty and the Chinese Southern Tang dynasty.
- The third year's settler was Southern Tang dynasty's Emperor Yuanzong (南唐中主唐元宗李璟), and at about 1000 years ago.
- The fourth and fifth years' settlers were father and son. The father was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wenzong(唐文宗李昂) and the son was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wuzong(唐武宗李瀍), at about 1200 years ago. These two Emperors are historically known heir-grandsons of famous Chinese Tang dynasty's Emperor Taizong and Emperor Xuanzong.
USJD and my entrusting attorneys, who is better?
My answer: I am a U.S. citizen and I am the sole beneficiary person.
Please check my other related articles from
My Online Gifting Ideas (我的亲朋送礼计划系列 )
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
----January 2nd, 2019
Regarding the anger why it has to be my money. 为什么这钱就只能归你所有的愤怒？
My answer: I understand this can be angry when someone is in the situation that in need of some money or wish to live in a better life, and I understand anger may out of the conceptual understanding that money represents problems-solved or a better life to all those people who share this anger. My own anger has been why it has to be my lawful money? So, let me materialize this anger to illustrate if this anger is about "someone's lawful money but not necessarily specifically my lawful money"我能理解当某人需要钱或者想过一份好的生活时，会有一些钱能解决问题及有钱就能过好日子的理解，并由此而产生一些愤怒，我的愤怒就是为什么想要钱就应该还必须拿我方敏合法的财产及收入？我来展示一下你们是否“只想要别人的合法的钱财但不一定是我的合法钱财”。
Illustration 1:
If you are in a grocery store, you saw an obviously fat wallet displayed casually in your next person's shopping cart, and if you were emotional with this anger "Why it has to be your money?", what will you do? 如果你是正在超市买东西，看到旁边一个人的推车上放着一个鼓鼓的钱包，如果你当时又正好在为“为什么就是应该是你自己的钱”这个道理而生气，那你看到了这个鼓鼓的钱包你会怎么做？
Illustration 2:
If you bypass a wonderful house and saw a beautiful couple with their happy children, and if you were emotional with this anger "Why it has to be owned by you?", what will you do about that house, that couple and those children?如果你经过一个高档住宅，看到一对漂亮夫妻和他们的快乐孩子，如果你当时又正好在为“为什么好的就是应该你自己的”这个道理而生气，那你准备对这房子，夫妻及孩子采取什么行动？
----Jan. 2nd, 2019
Regarding rumors that one of Painter's non-heir son also had set up a Trust, I don't know it that has been next-kin-inherited by the Painter's heir-son (my next generation grandfather) and distributed already, or otherwise. I myself have not heard if that heir-son grandfather of mine also has a Trust for me, so, I have not heard anything regarding that non-heir son's rumor.
有关800年前的国画大师张国焘有一个非继承人儿子可能也有一个信托的传言。我本人不清楚是否应该已在当时被他的继承人兄弟即我的下一代的爷爷按照亲属继承法所继承，并已经由该下一代爷爷的所有孩子所拥有，还是另有说法等等。我本人也还没有听说该下一代爷爷是否也有信托给我等等，所以我目前没听说任何相关信息。
----Jan. 2nd, 2019
01-01-2019 At least it is certainly won't be the fifth year, Happy New Year to the Federal
Heard this morning's broadcasting that NJ took 300Million, and MA announced a couple of months ago that any money paid to Boston stay in MA which possibly including my this year's Christmas store gift cards (heard it right before this Christmas).
All from the third year's living expenses paying company. The reason? It is the Federal's "lousy" job granted this opportunity. If you have read my blog yesterday, you know this is certainly won't be the story for the fifth year's paying company. The validation is beautifully done, it is not the Federal's lousy validation issue if whoever read validation-certificate incompletely.
What this meaning to me? I have to be a little more patient till all sorted out. The fourth year is the Father's company which may also possibly validation-safe, which means I may be able to get the fourth and the fifth year's providing soon. Others may need to wait some more time, but no concern if the money can be declared lawfully mine or if I can still have that third year's $400Million back. (Assumed Federal's lousy validation job of a private company's payment check is the reason of this experience, not certain if it was the Federal Reserve in this morning's arguing voice to NJ: "You can't do this" and Federal's determination "nobody can touch any money till confusion cleared".)
It is not good for me because those payments to MA are mostly from the third year's paying company (10,000 per month story company), that is all currently. I heard tighten the validation itself or the validation-certification may need several more weeks, but I don't know how lengthy argument it can be between the Federal Reserve and these states.
I truly appreciate the Federal's great job on validating so beautifully done, so I say "At least it is certainly won't be the fifth year's, Happy New Year to the Federal."
I say "For the fifth year's $400Million validation, it is absolutely your problem if you do not read the entire validation-certification page word by word, from the page's most-top to the page's most-bottom."
Why I am this relaxed to the Federal's "lousy" validation job? Because I know the proud of making a rough prototype works so imperfectly wonderful.
---- Jan. 1st, 2019
12-31-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (12) ---- My online gifting idea --
《Validation confusion “How you got this conclusion?”》
I heard this morning's broadcasting of some confusion regarding my $400Million yearly providing. I heard the confusion is from banks that have received this $400Million living expenses payment check titled with Min Fang's name from USTS together with a "lawfully Min Fang's money" validation letter from USJD office. I heard the confusion is because of some shared personal frustration in USTS and in Banks: "how the USJD office can have this 'lawfully Min Fang's money' conclusion with its own statements to explain the obvious otherwise"?
I heard the reading-tips are, for this shared personal frustration in reading this validation letter, :
- 1) there is a same-page prelude paragraph located pretty far above the main validation explanation statement paragraph that is not expected to be ignored.
- 2) The validation has proceeded with the hypotheses that include "No investor been deprived because of the payment".
- 3) This validation proceeding is because my ancient Trusts' registries are private records.
I add my own explanations:
- All these U.S. companies' payments are originated from profits of its local business operating, which means any paid-out $400Million is never "unknown source money".
- All according to its lawfully commercially registered investor-owner companies' lawfully valid instructions for my exclusive personal usage, which means any paid-out $400Million is never "any company's pre-company-tax money nor any public relation(PR) money".
- USJD office has never received any valid complaint regarding if any worldwide investor has been deprived at least $400Million each year since the payment, which means any paid-out $400Million is never "anyone else's money" but my lawful money.
If any booked service providers of mine share the same frustration, please contact your own legal department on how to validate this information.
----Dec. 31st, 2018
《验证疑云：“你怎么得出这结论的？”》
我听说了今天早上的播出提到我每年的生活费用给付究竟是什么钱的困扰。我听说困扰是一些银行，就是那些收到了USTA的4亿美金“方敏”抬头的支票及附加的USJD的验证了“是方敏的合法钱财”信件的银行。我听说了USTS和银行业很多人共同的困扰就是“USJD明明说了一通为何否定的解释，怎么又结论说确实就是方敏的合法钱财？”
我听说对于这封让很多人纠结不已的USJD办公室的验证信的阅读指南如下：
- 1）这封信的同一页上，有一段前言或序言，离主要段落文章是隔得挺远的，但不应认为是可忽略的。
- 2）验证的推理思维包括验证是否在世界范围内有某些投资人因为给我生活费用而被掠夺了至少4亿美金一年。
- 3）使用这种验证推理逻辑是因为我的古老信托登记都是私人资料不可查询。
我还听说2015-2019年期间的我的每年4亿美金的生活费用给付合法及我本人适用投资人的收入税都已经验证合法，并且验证过程法理逻辑非常严密。
我再加上我自己的解释：
- 所有这些美国公司的付款都是源自这些美国公司在当地经营业务的利润所得，也就是所有这些美国公司所支付的每年4亿美金都不是什么“财产来源不明”的情况。
- 所有这些美国公司的付款都是按照其各自的合法有效的公司注册登记记录上的的投资人指示
- 所支付的，也就是说这4亿美金每年的付款从来不是哪家公司的公款或者哪家公司的公共关系给付。
- 自USTS收到这每年4亿美金的付款后，USJD办公室至今从未接到过世界范围内有哪个投资人被掠夺了四亿美金的投诉，也就是说这每一个4亿美金给付都不是任何其他人的钱，而是我自己的合法钱财。
我听说这份读信纠结造成了很多困扰，也就是这是我的合法钱财还是作弄人的捐款，而R家就一直在怀疑这钱是不是从他们家什么人的什么账号里给左挪右移而捣鼓出来的，就只是没有被那人公开承认确实是那人授权给付的。针对R家的这份困扰，这同一封验证信也证实了所有这些美国公司的4亿美金的给付授权投资公司的投资份额在所累积的600年公司历史上上都没有改动过。R家的财富是在近代的200-300年里累积的，而付款公司的付款投资人已经是600年没动过其投资份额。所以这每年4亿美金的给付没有任何一年是由R家的任何人所支付的，也不是福特家的任何人或者沃顿家的任何人所支付的。
如果有已经预定向我提供服务的公司及机构也有类似的读信纠结，请联系你们公司的法务部门以核实该信息。
----2018年12月31日。
如果有已经预定向我提供服务的公司及机构也有类似的读信纠结，请联系你们公司的法务部门以核实该信息。
----2018年12月31日。
12-30-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (11) ----
《什么是信托，信托和所投资企业的关系》
什么是信托，可以用一个很多人都有的体验来解释：房屋产权
什么是“当时就给了”
如果你家老人付钱买了一套房子，找律师协助登记在你名下，等你长大后使用 --》“房子当时就给了”
家里老人提领了银行存款，找律师协助信托在你的名下，等你长大后领取--》“钱当时就给了。”
在李姓律师的协助下，我爷爷1948年就把5百万大洋信托的“女掌”名下，等“女掌”出生后领取，所以，“钱当时就给了女掌。”
什么是”记录更改无效”
你一旦买房子，就会有付款买房的记录，你必须凭此记录才可以去房屋管理局将所买房子登记在你自己名下。如果房屋管理局的工作人员在没有任何过户记录的情况下，就擅自将该房屋产权更新登记在别人名下，就叫做”记录更改无效”。
我爷爷办理信托，就会有付款给李姓律师办理该信托的记录。我听说的：李姓律师已凭此记录在香港信托登记处登记了该信托。1964-1965年，或者是1967年，在没有任何由我爷爷方智仁所授权的证据的情况下，有香港信托登记处的工作人员未经授权就擅自将该信托更新登记在某于姓人士名下，所以该更新记录在当时就已经被香港的信托登记处注明为”记录更改无效”。但这却造成了上海的于姓人士为香港的李家信托的法定所有权而困扰不已多年。
什么是“信托和信托所投资企业的关系”：
如果你爷爷是付钱买房的人，你爷爷找律师协助将房屋产权登记在你名下，你就是房屋产权的登记屋主。买房子需要做房屋质量验证，确保房屋价格没有诈欺，房屋管理局也有该房屋质量验证记录保存，如果你想卖房子，或对房屋质量有怀疑，可以查验此纪录。但如果你弟弟对你爷爷是否把房子给了你一个人有怀疑，你弟弟就只需要查验屋主登记的政府记录，而不需查验房屋质量验证的记录。
我爷爷找律师协助，付款给律师把5百万大洋信托在我名下，等我长大后提取。律师在信托登记处将该5百万大洋的信托注册登记了，同时也将该5百万大洋投资的资料也同时提交了（也就是提供了用该5百万大洋设立了一个李家信托公司进行投资的资料）。我爷爷其他子女如对我是否是该5百万大洋信托的唯一受益人有怀疑，就只需查验我是否是该信托的唯一受益人，但无需查验当初的5百万大洋是如何投资的具体信息，也就是说，只要他们不是该信托的受益人，就根本就不需要查验1948年的5百万大洋究竟投资到哪里去了的资料，也不需要查验5百万大洋所投资的李家信托这家公司的具体投资经营情况。
和中国政府就我继承财产的矛盾
就像屋主可以住在房子里，房客缴纳房租可以住在房子里，但如既不是屋主或屋主的客人，又非房客或房客的客人，哪里有可能就是一定要住在这个屋子里？信托所投资企业的工作人员可以在公司里拿工资，信托受益人作为企业的投资人可以提领到利润分红，但你们既不是企业的工作人员，又不是信托的受益人，你们凭什么就是一定要我的信托所投资的企业付钱给你们？
我对中国政府在美国及欧洲到处和企业联络，要求企业按方家其他人要求支付钱财的矛盾就在此。他们根本就不是信托的受益人，凭什么跑到企业要求企业给钱，企业没有钱给的：在企业交纳公司税之前，企业就只有企业公款没有任何私人钱财，在缴纳公司税之后，就只有投资人投资机构的利润分红的钱了，而他们既然不是信托的受益人就不是信托所投资企业的投资人，信托所投资的企业究竟能有什么钱必须给他们？就像房屋质量验证人员哪里会知道是谁才是买房子的那一个，信托所投资的企业那里会清楚谁才应该是该信托的受益人？
如果经过核查，确定某信托确实是我爷爷给我一个人的钱，为什么因为其他人也想要钱我就必须给钱？为什么只要他们是方家血缘后人，就可以由中国政府协助进行公然抢劫？如果我的信托所投资的企业的钱都已经到了不给就自己上门动手强拿的地步，这还不是公然抢劫啊？
还有，在国内国外，银行的企业存款私人存款都是有法律上的合法的存款户名的，银行职员哪里有可能可以自由地将私人存款公司存款的类别，随意更改为捐款类别就把银行存款的合法存款户名通过“认为应该是捐款吧”就给换成另一个存款户名了？这在美国全部都是洗钱刑事犯罪。这在中国是不是也是洗钱刑事犯罪？
----2018年12月30日。
12-29-2018 李家信托1967年的信托登记更改，在法律上无效的。
听说了今天早上播出的中共中央政治局常委韩正的妻子代表上海的于家人士和方家人士表达对于1948年所设立的香港李家信托的困扰。
疑问：香港的一个李家信托是在1948年由方智仁所设立，该信托登记已在1967年被更改，为何该信托还是归我所有？Question: The Li's family Trust was set up in 1948, but its registry was changed in 1967, why it is still my Trust?
回答：我所听说的，香港的一家李家信托是1948年由方智仁注资五百万大洋所设立，并由方智仁指定其长子方文海所出的女掌为唯一受益人（附有掌纹图）。作为该信托所指定的唯一受益人，我是1967年7月才出生，而该信托的设立人我爷爷方智仁是在1965年就已经去世。方智仁是中华人民共和国户籍本上所登记的我父亲方文海的父亲。我已经听说了该信托登记是在1967年被一位当时已是香港居民的于姓人士或其私人朋友所更改，这个更改登记的记录应该可以查核。按照英国法律，美国法律及中华人民共和国法律，李家信托1967年的登记更改，在法律上都是无效更改。所以该信托还是归我所有，我是在2004年继承该信托。（请看下面的举例解释说明。）I heard one of the several Li's Family Trust was set up by Fang, Zhiren in 1948 with 5Million Chinese Dayang, who specified the sole beneficiary should be the palm girl from his eldest son's palm line, attached with the illustration of the family palm birthmark. I, the sole beneficiary person, was born in 1967, while the Settler, Fang, Zhiren died in 1965. Fang, Zhiren was the recorded the birth & legal father to my birth & legal father Fang, Wenhai in People's Republic of China's city registry. I have heard the Trust registry was edited in 1967 by a Hong Kong resident Mr. Yu or his personal friend which certainly can be verified. According to the British Laws, the United States laws, and the People's Republic of China laws, such registry change was illegal & invalid. I inherited this Li's family Trust in 2004. (Please check the illustration explanation for illegal & invalid below.)
1948年信托设立时的香港受委托李姓律师，我听说前两天的播出已经说明在1950年代已经全家移民英国生活，我只是该信托的唯一受益人，所以我不是太清楚前几天播出的在香港长大的李家信托登记上的三个李姓共同律师是怎么回事。我记得几个月以前播出的某集内容里，英国司法机构对于1941-1949年期间在香港设立的七个李家信托也做过了专门解释。我记得播出的说明是其中两个是同一个受益人（我是我爷爷（1948）和我曾祖母（1941）两个李家信托的唯一受益人），还有四个李家信托多年前就已经无效也就是已经不存在了。I heard 1948's entrusting attorney has migrated to Britain in 1950 with his entire family. Being the sole beneficiary person, I don't know who the three Hong Kong grown-up co-entrusting Li's last named attorneys are, but I remembered several months ago, the British Justice Department has explained 7 Li's Family Trusts that were set up between 1941-1947. I remembered it said two of them share the same sole beneficiary person, four of them already dissolved over the years.
香港的1947年由上海的于先生注资一万大洋（？）所设立的一个于家信托，我不是太清楚，不过我有听说其当年设立后所投资的公司现在的（2018年）总规模是50万美金左右。与我所继承的李两个家信托所投资的公司都不是一家公司。我也不知该信托当年的受委托李姓律师是不是这三个香港长大的李姓律师的父亲? Regarding another Trust that was set up by a Mr. Yu in 1947 with 10,000 Chinese Dayang, I don't know much but I heard the company it invested since 1947 has its current size of $500,000 US dollar or so. It is totally a different company from the companies that my Trusts have been investing. And I don't know if that Trust's 1947 entrusting attorney Mr. Li was the father of that three HongKong grown-up co-entrusting attorneys.
我相信这些困扰都是可以通过英国或者香港的司法机关核实解答的。I think all these confusions can be resolved if check with UK's Justice Department and Hong Kong local Justice Department.
作为唯一受益人，我本人应该是由香港李家信托的现任律师出面联络，或由我本人联系美国警方协助联络香港李家信托的现任律师。我不太清楚香港李家信托的现任律师是谁，但我已经就香港的李家信托2004年按我要求所汇出的5亿美金投资款的如今下落联络了美国警方。Being the sole beneficiary person, I should be contacted by this Li's Family Trust's current entrusting attorney, or I should contact U.S. Justice Department ask for help to get in touch with the Trust's current attorney. I don't know who is the current attorney but I have contacted U.S. Justice Department regarding a $500Million U.S. dollar that was sent out to invest in the U.S. by this Trust as I requested in 2004.
----2018年12月28日。
国内国外对方敏是否继承财产事件的矛盾就在于，以李家信托的困扰为例子，中国政府似乎完全无视所有这些法律上对于该信托的法律所有权所作出的解释，其实都和中华人民共和国自己的信托及继承相关法律完全不抵触，也完全不矛盾，但中国政府似乎是根本无视李家信托1967年时期的信托登记更改，其实是一些人所实施的非法篡改法律记录以达到偷窃钱财的努力，而对于相关的于家一些人士对此所产生的困扰似乎就没有任何法律上的解释疏导，而是似乎是在企图利用中国的国家宣传机器强行通过宣布拥有而企图实质改变李家信托的法律财产拥有权。The problem that caused huge anger has been: I use today's confusion regarding Li's Family Trust as an example, the Chinese government seems completely ignore that all these explanations regarding this Trust's lawful ownership do not conflict nor violate China's own laws about Trust and its inheriting. But the Chinese government seems completely ignore the 1967's Registry change was a criminal attempt to illegally own the Trust by illegal change government Trust-registry record, and never provide legal help to those confused Yu's families but tried to use its government propaganda machine to forcefully and effectively change this Trust's lawful ownership.
举例解释：房屋产权登记的记录，如果不经过该物业的付款购屋业主的同意或者授权，而是通过在政府的房屋管理所任职的工作之便或私人朋友的工作之便，擅自更改该物业的法律所有权的法律登记记录，是否是企图非法拥有该物业的财产所有权？Illustration of this: Property Registry record. If such government property registry record was changed without any authorization from the lawful property owner nor the effort to inform the lawful property owner, but changed by a government employee's job-convenience, is this effort is attempted to illegally own this property?
包括对于美国当地一些公司法律拥有权的困扰，中国政府的努力似乎也是类似，通过国家宣传机器，完全无视当地的财产所有权是由当地法律所决定的，造成到处都是乱像，明明是法律所有权非常明确的公司财产私人财产，却被宣传成是没人要的钱而谁都可以随便拿。It is the same regarding the confusion about local American company's lawful ownership. The Chinese government seems completely ignore local wealth's lawful ownership is decided by local laws but seemed attempted to use its propaganda machines to impress the public that all these clearly lawfully owned local private wealth, company's assets or personal wealth, to be understood as no-owner money that should be so free to be announced-to-own by whoever, which has caused so criminalized-legal situations.
----2018年12月28日。
12-28-2018 Why I chose my father over my brother? (我为什么选择了父亲而不是弟弟？）
I was asked, why I chose my birth and legal father over my same parent's younger brother?
My answer: Because I am certain that it is my father who raised me, not my younger brother. This seems to be very hard for some same parents elder sister to understand. I say I can only be frank enough to explain myself.
- I am curious, how your birth father abused you that you forgot it is your birth father who made hard money to bring your food on the table, not your same parent's younger brother?
- I am curious, since what age you started to share your birth father's bed as well as your same parents' younger brother's bed? that you favor your same parents' younger brother's smooth skin and strong body but despise your birth father's wrinkles and dripping blader?
- I am curious, what else can make you hate your birth father as such, to think your birth father's death is a relief and never a loss, but can't afford to lose contact with your same parents' younger brother?
我虽是我父亲的亲生女儿，可我也是一个同父同母的姐姐，为何选择了父亲？这让一些国内做姐姐的就是难以明白我的选择。
我的回应：我很清楚，是我的父亲为我含辛茹苦，是我的父亲关爱我的衣食冷暖，从来不是我同父同母的弟弟。我能帮助国内一些做姐姐的明白我的观点的方式就是美国人坦诚直率的方式：
- 我想知道，你亲生的父亲是如何虐待了你，让你忘了你亲生父亲是辛苦挣钱帮你买饭吃的那一个？
- 我想知道，你是从哪一岁开始和你的亲生父亲及你同父同母的弟弟同时有了性交往关系，会让你选择了你同父同母弟弟的年轻勇猛及光滑肌肤，而鄙视你亲生父亲的一身皱皮及膀胱失禁？
- 我想知道，还有什么原因让你仇恨你的亲生父亲，认为你的亲生父亲死了不值得算作是你的损失，而你的同父同母弟弟却是你难以割舍的？
----2018年12月28日。
（我是2015年1月在越洋电话中才得知，方文海已在2013年10月“去世了”，亘本就没有任何人认为我作为方文海的女儿需要知道，而没有任何人认为方文海会需要知道是否可以见见女儿，一切就只为了最高利益，让方文海的房子可以安全的转入儿子媳妇的名下。这样，方文海被推出车外可能是造成死亡原因的事情，就不会有人投诉了，儿子媳妇都已经被帮助了，得到补偿了，方文海都已经死绝了，还有谁会在乎方文海是怎么死的？
----2019年1月16日更新。）
（我是2015年1月在越洋电话中才得知，方文海已在2013年10月“去世了”，亘本就没有任何人认为我作为方文海的女儿需要知道，而没有任何人认为方文海会需要知道是否可以见见女儿，一切就只为了最高利益，让方文海的房子可以安全的转入儿子媳妇的名下。这样，方文海被推出车外可能是造成死亡原因的事情，就不会有人投诉了，儿子媳妇都已经被帮助了，得到补偿了，方文海都已经死绝了，还有谁会在乎方文海是怎么死的？
----2019年1月16日更新。）
听说了今天早上有人宣布一个月给一万元钱，我不认识做宣布的这个人，也肯定没碰过这个人的奶子屁股两腿中锋。如果这人是想宣布把我的钱给东给西的，我估计这人一定是个精神病人，至少是个重度花痴之类的，弄不清她（他）自己的奶子屁股两腿中锋根本就没那么值钱。不过要是她（他）自己的钱，那她（他）是想给谁就给谁了。
有国人说，就是因为不认识，所以才会以为我会给个面子按所宣布的付钱。我在海外生活多年，我对此的理解就是：你怎么那么自信，认定我只要一看见你，就一定会脱掉我自己的裤子？因为钱包是在脱掉的裤子口袋里，所以你就够的着我的钱了？否则，不认识我怎么就够得着我的钱了呢？所以我说你至少是个重度的花痴呢？
有国人说，就是因为不认识，所以才会以为我会给个面子按所宣布的付钱。我在海外生活多年，我对此的理解就是：你怎么那么自信，认定我只要一看见你，就一定会脱掉我自己的裤子？因为钱包是在脱掉的裤子口袋里，所以你就够的着我的钱了？否则，不认识我怎么就够得着我的钱了呢？所以我说你至少是个重度的花痴呢？
----2018年12月28日。
12-27-2018 方敏对今天早上以中共中央政治局全体扩大会议名义所表达立场的回应
听说了今天早上以中国政府名义所表达立场。
我的回应：我和中国政府的矛盾从来不是中国国家领导人的私生子及私人恋爱婚姻生活。
我方敏从不认为中共中央政治局全体扩大会议的全体成员都是花痴精神病变态人员，会认为我只在1991年有过一次饭局及一通电话的与中国国家总理李克强全部交往关系情况下，在中共中央政治局全体扩大会议非常确定自1991年以后，我方敏从未联络该花痴精神病变态人士或要求联络该花痴精神病变态人士以建立浪漫关系的情况下，在其间只有2015年一次传真信件至中国纽约领事馆，而该信件就是我寄往美国政府相关机构的同一份信件的情况下，在中共中央政治局全体扩大会议非常确定这一切都是事实的情况下，会需要在27年后的2018年由中共中央政治局扩大会议的全体女性成员及全部男性委员妻子为其婚姻自由选择的合法妻子必须被公开承认而矢志奋斗以表达中国政府对我方敏的性骚扰永不停息的坚定意志。
我方敏本人很清楚今天早上以中国政府名义所表达立场与中国政府在中国国内的宣传基调是一致的。我方敏本人对中华人民共和国的贡献一切真实，问心无愧。我方敏本人仍在观望，究竟中华人民共和国是否还是中国共产党领导下的宪法有效，以事实为依据实事求是为人民服务的法治国家。
----2018年12月27日。
12-26-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (9) ---- My online gifting idea
《 My Royal Titles and validation of the lawful ownership》
Heard this morning's broadcasting mentioned the beauty of the validation for my investor tax rate. With everybody seems trying to rewrite the original beauty of this water-proof judicial literature, I can't hear what was announced, but tons of lousy arguments. Basically, I heard this morning detailed out why I am proved the sole beneficiary qualified for investor tax, and no one else is eligible even though I have close kins and Trust registries are private.
There are two arguments, one is who is the better one? my entrusting attorneys, or the U.S. Justice Department?
My answer: I am a U.S. citizen and the beneficiary person.
----Dec. 26th, 2018
The other argument, is this a scheme? How an investor-ownership can be validated by just writing a piece of judicial literature?
My answer: It is validated with supporting evidence which includes 6+1 countries' Justice Department's testimonies that none of American paying company's upstream investor-companies in each's country has been deprived because of the payment, as well as no complaint has ever received if any of the American paying company's upstream investors being deprived because of the payment. And more, of course.
----Dec. 26th, 2018
One more related question, how this validated I am Simba's Royal Heir?
My answer: I heard my last year's living expense providing paying company's ancient upstream investor company has been historically known set up by the person who was featured in the <Lion King> animation movie as Simba. I was provided for this paying company because I am its specified lawful sole beneficiary person. This year's payment is from the historically known Simba's son's money, I am also its specified lawful sole beneficiary person. Each also entitled its sole beneficiary person, which is me, with an Emperor equivalent entitlement.
So, I am the Ingonyama officially validated now. I am the Missy Ingonyama.
----Dec. 26th, 2018
我的皇室封号及法律拥有权的核实
听说了今天早上提到让我符合投资人税率的资格证实法律程序做的有多漂亮。太多人都在尝试用自己的语言重述今天早上所宣布的，所以我就没听见都宣布了些什么，就只听到一堆的逻辑不严谨。基本上，也就是宣布了在信托登记不公开的情况下, 为何我符合投资人税率，而且是就算我有很多亲戚血缘关系，但就只有我一个人符合该投资人税率资格。
我听到有两个于此相关的争议，一个争议是谁才是法律法学上更厉害的一个？我的信托律师，还是美国司法部？
我的回答：我是美国公民，我是受益人。
----2018年12月26日。
另一个争议就是，这是不是伎俩？那有可能企业投资人的拥有资格可以写一纸法律文献就可以证实了？
我的回答：核实是验证了大量的证据的，这些证据包括6+1个国家司法部门证实该美国付款公司在各自国家里的投资母公司的资产没有因该付款而造成该国相关投资公司的资产被掠夺，以及从来没有接到过该美国付款公司的任何一个投资母公司因该付款而造成投资人资产被掠夺的投诉。当然还有更多证据。
----2018年12月26日。
还有一个相关的疑问，这如何证实了我是《狮子王》动画片里的Simba的皇位继承人?
我的回答：我听说《狮子王》动画片里的Simba的原型，就是支付我去年的生活费用给付的那家美国公司的一个很古老上游投资公司的设立人，历史上就一直很著名的，支付我生活费用的原因是我是其指定的法律上唯一的收益人；支付我今年生活费用的美国公司的一个很古老上游投资公司的设立人，历史上就一直知道是这个Simba原型的儿子。我也是其唯一受益人。各自又都有授予其指定的唯一受益人（也就是我）一个等同皇帝地位的封号。
所以，我的狮子王Ingonyama封号已经正式经过核实了。我是一个小姐，所以，我是狮子王小姐。
----2018年12月26日。
12-25-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (8) ---- Merry Christmas?
Heard this Christmas Day morning's frustration from those blood associated.
My anger has been
1) Why they have demanded to me as if I owe their kindness or financial debts, knowing I never heard of them before all these harassments is a True statement.
2) Why they have demanded with such anger as if their lines never got their shares in the family inheriting at that shared grandfather's death?
3) Why I have money according to my birth grandfathers' wills is the reason that I am "not allowed to own"? Why those I am willing to gift are "not allowed to receive"?
4) Why those who care so much about anyone who is in-need keep demanding me for money and don't allow my own beloved to have better financial arrangement from my money, not to mention to own a house or better clothing, why themselves refuse to sell their own house to show their own care to whoever they are willing to support demanding me for money? All my beloved have to be abused to only allowed to live on welfare in order to support all these demanding for money in-need, why is this?
5) Why my own beloved ones do not deserve to have a Merry Christmas gifted by my own money? Why I myself don't deserve a Merry Christmas party of my own that is financed by my own money?
I refuse to gift to any of those frustration expressed on this Christmas Day. All those who truly care persons can certainly sell their own house to give out their so special gifts to whoever they care. I am only allowed to be abused and to live on welfare is the reason for my this refusal and a lot of my emails to the law enforcement.
----Dec. 25th, 2018
12-24-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (6) ---- Why I eligible for investor income tax rate?
There are more ripples about my gifting related ---- Whose money I intend to gift lawfully?我准备用谁的钱送礼？（中文附后）
1: Is it possible there are 5 persons who want to give me money provided for me $4Million each year for the past 5 years?
My answer: I heard two of the five years' paying American investment are historically known for from the father and heir son. I heard it has been validated that my fourth year (2018) was provided by Simba, my this year's (2019) is by his son, as both of their specified sole beneficiary person upon instruction. I am Ingonyama Mufasa's heir-child is now officially validated. I am the Ingonyama, I am the Missy Ingonyama Fang. I enjoy being the Missy Fang always, even I may not use my maiden name on my credit cards. Merry Christmas to myself.
I heard U.S. Justice Department's validation used Simba's official name (Li, Ang; 唐文宗李昂), his father Ingonyama Mufasa is Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Mu（Li, Heng; 唐穆宗李恒), his son was Li, Chan (唐武宗李瀍).
References：
List of Chinese monarchs
Emperor Wuzong of Tang
中国君主列表
唐武宗 （维基百科）
----Dec. 24, 2018
2: Why I eligible for the investor tax rate? because there are at least two of those providing paying investments are from the same family, and I am provided upon each's investor's instruction as each's clearly and legally validly specified sole beneficiary person "Female Palm(女掌)" because of the family birthmark I have on my both palms. So, I am eligible for the investor tax rate.
----Dec. 24, 2018
3: Another Two Trusts are from the mother and her son: Hong Kong's two "Li's (Lee's) Family Trust".
One was set up in 1941 by my great-grandmother with 60,000 Chinese Dayang, one was set up in 1948 by my grandfather with 5Million Chinese Dayang, both called Li's(Lee's) Family Trust. Both settlers are recorded in the People's Republic of China's city registry as my birth great-grandmother and grandfather, I am the sole beneficiary person of each Trust.
I heard the Trust my great-grandmother set up for me has intended to send $100,000 to help out, if so, I say I am willing to let this $100,000 U.S. dollar send to my birth and legal father Fang, Wenhai（方文海) upon law enforcement's validation if he is alive, and on the requirement that my birth and legal father has to use it all on himself, I say so as the sole beneficiary person "Female Palm（女掌）" of the Trust that set up in 1941 by my great-grandmother. My great-grandmother was the one who raised my father in her own household, which had been a next-door neighbor to my grandparents' own household.
----Dec. 24, 2018
4： Why so many people saying I can't have my own money?
My answer: I heard one scheme is the "swap game", which has been targeting me. But all of my inherited wealth has been all under entrusting so that it is impossible to be misunderstood if I participated. And, all of my intellectual incomes are also impossible to be misunderstood can be swapped without me even heard of it.
----Dec. 24, 2018
中文大意
1：有没有可能是有这么5个人愿意给我钱花，所以每人给了我这每年的4亿美金？我听说五年中的两年是由历史上就很知名的是父亲和继承人儿子各自的两个投资基金所支付的。我听说已经证实的就是我2018年的付款美国基金的投资人就是狮子王里的Simba的，2019年的付款基金的投资人就是Simba的继承人儿子的，付款是依据投资人的指示，因我是这两个信托各自的唯一受益人而给付。我是狮子王穆法萨的继承人孩子已经被证实了，我是狮子王，我是狮子王方家大小姐。我喜欢自己永远被称为方家大小姐，虽然我的信用卡可能不会用这个娘家姓。这真是给了我自己好大一个圣诞快乐。
我听说是美国司法部核实的，用的Simba的原名李昂（唐文宗李昂）进行核实的，狮子王穆法萨是唐穆宗李恒，Simba的儿子就是唐武宗李瀍(Li, Chan).：
索引：
List of Chinese monarchs
Emperor Wuzong of Tang
中国君主列表
唐武宗 （维基百科）
----2018年12月24日。
2：我为什么符合投资人税率？因为这五年当中有两年是按照同一家庭的父与子所分别设立的基金的指示所支付的，因为我双手手掌上的家族胎记掌纹及父系血脉，我是这两个基金各自所明确且合法指定的唯一受益人"女掌”，所以，我符合投资人税率。
----2018年12月24日。
3：香港的两个信托是母子各自设立的：香港的两个李家信托。
这两个信托，一个是1941年由我曾祖母以6万大洋所设立的，一个是我爷爷1948年以5百万大洋所设立的，两个都叫做李家信托，这两个信托的设立人是中华人民共和国的有效户籍登记上的我爷爷和我曾祖母。我是这两个信托各自的唯一受益人。
我听说我曾祖母的那个信托想电汇10万美金现金帮帮忙，如果如此，如果警方可以证实我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海是否还活着以后，我愿意将这10万美金电汇给我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海，条件是我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海必须将这钱全部花在我法律和血缘上的亲生父亲方文海自己身上，我是以这个1941年由我曾祖母所设立信托的唯一受益人“女掌”身份这么说的。我的曾祖母是在她自己家里一手将我父亲带大的一个，他们祖孙两个一直都是我爷爷奶奶一墙之隔的隔壁邻居。
----2018年12月24日。
4: 为什么这么多人说我不可以有我自己的钱？
我的回答：我听说有一个“置换游戏”伎俩可能一直以我为靶标。但我所继承的所有财产全部都在信托当中，所以不可能误解我是否有参与过置换。我的智慧产权收入也是不可能误解我是否参与过置换。
----2018年12月24日。
12-21-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (6) ---- My online gifting idea
1: About my online gifting idea: What information needed to validate a friend from an occasion? Please specify the date, time, and the characteristic behavior. What will be the no-question asked gifting size once validated? $500 U.S. dollar. （有关网上送礼的：如何确定一个一面之交的朋友？请提供时间和日期，以及可协助确定的举止行为。一旦确定，如果是什么都不愿意被询问的情况，礼物多大？美金500元。）
----Dec, 23rd, 2018
2: Heard about why not charity but personal gifting. I don't think this is anything confusing but.., My anger is why can't I gift to my personal friends? and why can't I leave charity matters to those professionals?（听说了有关为什么不做慈善捐款而是个人送礼？我不认为这是什么困扰，而是。。。我的气愤就是我为什么不能个人送礼？我为什么不可以让专业人士处理慈善捐款事宜？）
As I have explained any donation from any investments that my Trust has been investing, there is a portion from my Trust's investing profit share which is my donation share, why can't I leave the handling of this donation share to charity professionals from the investment? Why donation has to be from my living-expenses providing to say I care about families in-needs? Why can't I gift to my personal friends from my after income-tax living-expenses providing? I already made it very clear that I leave donation matters to professionals from those investments each of my Trusts has been investing, and that is it.（就像我已经解释的，所有由我的信托所投资企业的慈善捐款里面，都有我的一部分投资收益在里面一起捐了，我为什么不可以让慈善专业人士处理这类捐款事宜？为什么必须从我的生活费用给付里捐款才可以说我关心那些需要帮助的家庭？为什么我就不可以用我交过收入税后的个人生活费用给付向我私人的朋友们送送礼？我已经讲得很清楚了，所有慈善捐款事宜，我都是交给我的信托所投资的企业处理，就这样。）
----Dec. 23rd, 2018
3: Heard about the confusion regarding HongKong's company 李家信托 which is a commercial company named Li's Family Trust. I don't know exactly what is the confusion, about its name? or about its investment? or about if that is the Trust my grandfather set up for me? or about if I am being the sole beneficiary person of the Trust I inherited.（听说了有关香港的一家商业公司”李家信托“的困扰。我不是太清楚究竟都困扰了些什么，公司名称？公司的业务经营？是否是我爷爷替我设立的信托所设立投资的？以及我是否是我爷爷所指定的信托唯一受益人？）
3-I) Confusion if that is invested by the Trust my grandfather set up for me? I don't know who is confused about this, or why? but this confusion can be helped by Hong Kong's Law enforcement if any lawful interest being impacted by confusion. I myself have already contacted U.S. law enforcement because my lawful interest may have been impacted.（是否这家”李家信托“公司是由我爷爷替我设立的信托所建立所投资的？我不清楚谁在为此困扰，为什么？但是如果自身法律权益因此困扰而受到影响，，这个困扰是可以通过向香港警方求助予以澄清的。我本人就是因为困扰可能影响到了我的合法权益而已经联系了美国警方。)
3-II) Confusion if I am being the sole beneficiary person of the Trust that my grandfather set up for me? This confusion can only be from my grandfather's other children that they can certainly ask Shanghai or Nanjing local law enforcement's help to validate. (*I heard this has been validated already that Li's Family Trust has nothing to do with my grandfather's other children, by Chinese Justice Department 中国司法部) (我是是否是我爷爷替我所设立信托的唯一受益人？这种困扰就只能是我爷爷的其他子女才会有的，他们可以向上海及南京的警方求助澄清核实。（*我听说“李家信托”这家公司和我爷爷的其他子女没有任何关系是中国司法部已经核实了的。）
3-III) Confusion about its name? 李家信托 is a commercial company that may have been established and invested by the wealth(15Million US. Dollar) that was entrusted by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren in 1948. I heard this was the company sent out 500Million US dollar to the United States in 2004 as I requested. The reasons for confusion include （我爷爷和我都姓方，为什么会是“李家信托”？”李家信托“是一家商业公司，据说“李家信托”是在1948年由我爷爷所信托的1500万美金所设立所投资。我听说2004年就是这家公司按我要求电汇5亿美金到美国。相关的困扰有：
- The Trust registry was under a Li last name person but my grandfather's last name is Fang? I heard Mr. Li recorded in Trust Registry was the entrusting attorney of 1948.（这个信托登记是在一个李先生的名下，我听说这个李先生是1948年设立信托时的受委托律师。）
- If 500Million U.S. dollars in 2004 was all that I could have which means I have taken all the money which should mean the Trust dissolved already? I have to clarify that I only took out all the available cash in 2004 from the Trust I inherited, the Trust was not dissolved. Today, I am still the same sole beneficiary person of the same Trust. （是否我2004年所拿的5亿美金是我的信托的全部款项，也就是说我提领了5亿美金，信托就被解散了？我必须澄清我在2004年只是提领了可提现的全部现金，信托并未因此而解散，我今天也还是同一个信托的唯一受益人。)
- The example of this is a restaurant's owner asking the cashier to take out all the cash from its cash-registry which only means all the available cash would be taken but never means the boss dis-own the restaurant. It is the same that I am still the beneficiary person of the same Trust. （举例说明：一个餐厅的老板让收银员把今天银箱里全部的现金都给这个老板，但这绝不是意味着这老板从此不再是这家餐馆的老板了。我今天也还是同一个信托的唯一受益人。）
4) Confusion about its investments? Who is confused about its investments? and why? Again, I am just a beneficiary person of the Trust who has not involved in its investments, please contact 李家信托 regarding all your confusion about its investments, and please direct your concern if I am bilking to be the beneficiary person associated to 李家信托 to HongKong's law enforcement.（有关“李家信托”这家公司的投资经营？究竟谁在困扰？为什么？我再强调一次，我只是一个信托的受益人，完全不介入信托的投资经营，请就你所有困扰联系”李家信托“这家商业公司，请就你是否怀疑我是在利用“李家信托”这个公司的名字招摇撞骗联系香港警方。
----Dec. 23rd, 2018
12-21-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (5) ---- My online gifting idea
Heard some questions about my online gifting idea.
1: How's the friend's gifting?
My answer: I have not figured out how to validate a friend from an occasion, what would be needed but not intrusive information, etc., and I heard commercial security screening service is a great idea to validate if the information is at least from a friendly and how friendly which would be the basis for gifting size, my past several years' "never lonely" experiences are included. 1) All are appreciated and 2) fair to all, would be the best way to describe my efforts of managing my gifting budget. (My budgeting plan was warned for "hot summer most likely" already. 😘 Luckily I have learned some professional financing and budgeting, and I do take "reserve several years', start with the regular 20Million per year" advice seriously. ）
----Dec 22nd, 2018
2: How long this gifting can possibly prolong?
My answer: I expect this fixed $20Million per year gifting to be permanent because I should be provided at least $400Million yearly. I have been provided so for the past 5 years (including current) already from my 5 birth Chinese grandfathers' Trusts each year, I don't know how many my own birth grandfathers have blessed me so lovingly, but I can certainly expect this $400Million a year from these 5 grandfathers' loving blessing, permanently and forever.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
3: Why I haven't received any blessing if from my own birth grandfathers?
My answer: Because there has been 1) some ownership-confusion regarding these Trusts' investments, and 2) some confusion regarding "what is a Trust" from China (blood associated and not blood-associated), as well as 3) public and legal confusion regarding if any of these payments are from a private investor eventually or from a company that deprived its lawful investor.
Now, most of the ownership confusions (if not all) have been clarified, China seems working on "money lawful ownership means to own money according to laws, not willingness nor deservedness", and all the payments have been clarified according to laws to be upon lawful investors' instructions that no company has deprived its lawful investor. So, I am expecting these payments now and already started my gift-budgeting.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
4: How this "No lawful investor being deprived" been validated if none of these Trusts' registry is open to the public?
My answer: Basically, what I heard is the validation has addressed legal confusions about if a lawful investor possibly being deprived.
1:) According to laws, 6+1 countries' governments' Justice Departments have validated those paying related companies in each of these countries has not deprived each's lawfully registered investor owner.
2:) According to laws, 6+1 countries' governments' Justice Departments have validated those paying related companies in each of these countries have not changed each's lawful investor since each company's establishment, and accumulated years qualified laws' required "over 600 years."
3:) According to laws, 6+1 countries' governments' Justice Departments have validated those paying related companies in each of these countries have not received any complaint filed from each's lawful investor since each's such upon-instruction providing payment(s).
...
So, None of these paying related companies that have provided for me had deprived its investor, and I am qualified for investor tax.
And, all these 6+1 countries are famous for each's economic scale.
So, I am comfortable that none of these Trusts' registry is open to the public.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
5： How can it be so certain that I am the sole beneficiary person?
My answer: I heard it also been validated as well, it was backward validation. Meaning? All the Trusts' registries that set up by my closest five generation grandfathers and my great-grandmother which covers all the legally valid kin are all have been validated, I am the lawful sole beneficiary person for all these Trusts.
----Dec 22nd, 2018
中文大意：
1：亲朋礼准备怎么送？
我的回答：我还没想好如何界定一面之交朋友，也就是所需信息既可以足够界定又不会让朋友觉得太涉及其隐私，还有我听说商业用的电脑安检服务是很适合用于鉴定是否友善，而友善程度就是我决定礼品大小的依据，我过去几年“毫不孤单”的经历也会包括。
1) 所有的善意我都珍惜，2)不会厚此薄彼，这两点会是我管理这份礼品支出的努力目标。（我已经被警告 “就这速度，很快可能就没钱了。” 😘 幸运的是，我可是已经学过了专业的资金运作和预算决算了，而且我也很认真对待“要有资金储配，第一年就用常规的2千万美金开始“之类的建议。
----2018年12月22日。
2：这份亲朋礼估计能持续多久？
我的回答：我预期这个固定的每年2千万美金的礼金支出应该是永久的，我每年的生活费用给付应该可以有至少四亿美金。过去五年（包括今年）我都是每年4亿美金生活费，全部是由我自己的5代中国亲生爷爷各自替我设立的信托所支付的，我不清楚我有多少个亲生爷爷给了我如此丰厚祝福，但我肯定是可以被这五个爷爷的五份祝福长久提供我每年4亿美金的生活费用，子子孙孙长长久久直到永远永远。
----2018年12月22日。
3：如果是我自己亲生爷爷给的钱，那我怎么还没收到生活费用？
我的回答：如下原因啦：1）我爷爷们所设立的这些信托所投资企业的法律所有权有些困扰，2）来自中国（那些有血缘关系的以及没有血缘关系的）对于“究竟什么是信托“的困扰，3）公众及法学法理上的对于这些已支付的生活费用是否意味着是在掠夺某个公司的合法投资人的合法财产的困扰。
目前为止，绝大部分所投资企业的法律所有权困扰已经澄清了，中国方面似乎正在撇清有关“财产的法律所有权是指，财产归谁所有是由法律所决定的，而不是由想要钱的意愿或者就配拿钱的感觉所决定的“，而且，所有这些已支付的生活费用已经依据法律澄清为根据投资人指示的合法给付，没有一家公司因此支出而掠夺了其投资人的财产。所以，我是已经在等待领取生活费用，也已经开始了礼物预算。
----2018年12月22日。
4：如果我所继承的这些信托的登记信息都不公开，那如何证实了 “没有一家公司掠夺了其法律上的合法投资人？ “
我的回答：基本上来说，我听说的验证是针对法律上是否有可能会有这些付款公司的投资人被掠夺了。
1：）根据法律，6+1个国家的司法当局证实了这些国家里的付款相关公司没有掠夺其法律工商登记上的合法投资拥有者。
2：）根据法律，6+1个国家的司法当局证实了这些国家里的付款相关公司自从公司登记成立伊始就没有更换过其法律登记上的合法投资人，所累计年份也符合法律所规定的 “超过了600年 “。
3：）根据法律，6+1个国家的司法当局证实了这些国家里的付款相关公司自从按照投资人指示支付该费用后从未收到过其任何合法投资人有关该支出的任何投诉。
。。。。
所以，所有这些付款相关公司都没有掠夺他们的合法投资人，我也符合投资人税率。
还有，这6+1个国家都是很有名的经济发达国家，所以即使我的信托登记资料不公开，我作为受益人也是很踏实。
----2018年12月22日。
5: 是如何确定我是唯一受益人的？
我的回答：我听说也是证实过了，倒推方法证实的。
什么意思？就是说我最近代的5个爷爷及我的曾祖母（也就是涵盖了所有的五等亲）替我设立的信托登记都已经被验证了，我是所有他们所设立的这些信托的唯一受益人。
----2018年12月22日。
12-21-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (4)
我的亲朋送礼计划继续引发涟漪, 听说了今天早上所播出的一些澄清和一些疑问。
所澄清的：
1：美国财政部官员证实有收到2004年7月1日办理信托人士所委托款项，也已按照委托要求予以处理，但没提及信托受益人的姓名。
----2018年12月21日
2：Regarding the saying there is no guarantee if I can receive any money from the past several years' payout but from this year's on can be protected by laws.
My comment: Is that from some Chinese citizens? Is that to imply laws have been disabled for the past several years in the United States but can be re-installed from now on? Who can be this privileged to disable laws in the United States? All those paid-out from my Trusts' investments have been in the United States.
----Dec. 21st, 2018
疑问：
1：为何坚持是信托继承？
我的回应：我需要一些就"什么是信托"的法律专业帮助。不是我在坚持自己是信托继承而不让其他人分财产，而是依据法律，我的财产继承是信托继承类别。
我们方家一直都有在分家产时办理信托给年幼孩子的传统，方家血缘关系或多或少都听说过家里有很多分家产时年幼儿子拿到的是信托，等成年后领取的故事。这份“为何坚持是信托继承”的争议是丁姓私人助理家人那里的。
我的愤怒：按照中华人民共和国的法律，丁姓私人助理的所有小孩都是跟随丁姓私人助理夫妻生活长大，由丁姓私人助理夫妻抚养至成年，在他们和我爷爷方智仁既没有任何法律上的领养手续，也没有事实上的领养关系，更没有任何血缘关系的情况下，为何坚持必须以丁姓私人助理和我奶奶毛阿妹有性交关系为理由而抢夺毛阿妹丈夫方智仁的财产？为何坚持只要是方智仁财产，至少一部分就必须归丁姓私人助理的孩子所有？为何丁姓私人助理家人的如此违反中华人民共和国法律的要求居然会得到中华人民共和国政府的协助？
我的信托继承：我所继承的信托是方智仁1948年就已经设立，方智仁所指定的该信托受益人在1948年就已经是方智仁自己的长子方文海所出的“女掌”而不是长子方文海本人，并附有掌纹图。方智仁直至1965年去世都从未改变该信托的受益人。
解释：”女掌“自1948年起就已经是方智仁所信托的该财产的合法拥有者，也就是说该财产自1948年该信托设立伊始就已经从方智仁名下过户到了女掌名下，即方智仁1948年就已经将这笔钱给了其长子方文海所出的“女掌”，所附掌纹图及应该是哪支所出的说明，都是为了指定该家族名字“女掌“究竟是谁。
”女掌”是我爷爷们给我起的家族名字。1967年我出生后，我父亲方文海登记了我的户籍名字为方敏，也就是说，方敏是我父亲方文海给我起的户籍名字。2004年，在验证了我的掌纹后，我以户籍名字方敏继承了存在我的家族名字女掌名下的由方智仁1948年就已经委托给予”女掌”的该信托财产。
如果还不清楚，可以模拟办理一份信托，你就会知道在你所希望的受益人可以在法律上明确界定之后，律师就会要求你将所希望信托的财产交付给律师，也就是说你必须将你自己的存款从银行里取出交付给律师，由律师予以投资或存款，该款项也不再是你自己所拥有钱款，所以是”(1948年)当时就给了”。
----2018年12月21日
2：“为何1948年就给了而不是1965年去世时才给？” 我估计是因为中国当时在闹共产主义，1948年当时的上海已经能感受到当时的国民政府自己已经有了危机感。
----2018年12月21日
3：我拿到的究竟是什么钱？
我的回应：每一个人，在中国在海外，都有可能有三种收入，1）自己工作挣得的工资奖金或者专利费，2）家里父母爷爷奶奶给的，3）婚姻恋爱关系给的。
我方敏1996年10月离开中国就一直在美国学习生活工作了20多年，我所有的财产都是在1996年到了美国以后以后拥有（准确时间是在2004年以后），也很确定我所有财产里面没有一分钱是由中国的国库财政部财政厅财政局支付（目前为止，我的奥运会创意人奖金等都还没有拿到），那么，在我方敏这三种有可能的收入里面，哪一种收入是让中华人民共和国如此举国上下愤怒的？还有哪一类收入是你们认为的方敏的钱财来源？
捐款类别？每年捐款4亿给我用？谁会这么做啊？怪道我就听说了丁姓私人助理的孩子们是到处向人说，不管他们问谁，问哪家企业，问为什么把钱给我，听到都是一片的“都不愿意！！！”
我本人就此已经一再解释了，我的智慧产权收入是我自己的工作收入，我所继承的是一些家里的爷爷奶奶给我的信托，美国有钱的男人女人都没给过我裤裆钱。究竟是什么钱不准我方敏“偷偷”放在自己口袋里，必须让我方敏拿出来放在桌上？
----2018年12月21日
12-20-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (3)
听说了我的亲朋送礼计划在华裔社区引起了一些反响。有关的疑惑：
1：我有钱怎么就送这么一点礼物？
我的回应：还少啊？就这200人左右的血缘关系，每人没几个子儿就已经美金一千万了。我生活费用给付的钱还没拿到，就已经担心每月自己能剩多少。每年4亿，就是每月3500万美金左右。按照美国常规，1/3是房租，如果按照今天早上所播出的对有钱人的期待，5万美金每人的新年红包，血缘关系加同等人数亲朋，我过年那个月的生活费就只剩房租了，绝对是个瘦骨伶仃。其他月份，按照众人期待值是歌舞升平每人5万元，那我就是月月瘦骨伶仃的。不行不行，我坚决拒绝这瘦骨伶仃的有钱人生活。
（在美国，房子不是租的就是买的，所以家居理财专家通常就是建议将收入的1/3作为居住所需的支出以保障日常生活所需的其他支出不会因过高的房屋居住相关支出而受到影响。房贷和房租在金额上有点差别但差别不大，但买房后就成了一个蜗牛背了个房贷30年，房租就轻松很多，有点什么风吹草动的，换个房子搬个家，很容易。国内没有房租，就很难理解为什么必须租这么好的房子，买也是一样，就是这个规模的费用。我对让我少付点房屋支出以增加礼物支出的的看法是，你想要买好房子过好日子，就奇怪我为什么要住好房子？也就是说你认为我应该省吃俭用来让你过上你想过的好日子？你要求我降低我自己的生活水准，来提高你自己的生活水准？我当然拒绝了，又没欠了你什么钱。生活费用的5%（2千万美金每年）是我可以在不降低我自己生活水准的情况下送礼的规模，超过了5%，也就是超过了我的承受能力，那就已经不是亲朋间的送礼了。----2019年1月5日更新）
我的这个每年2千万美金亲朋礼的初衷就是让诸位亲朋在有点难处时，不用为如何开口寻求帮助而费尽思量。就象有些朋友讲的，公司裁员或者自己转换工作，或者家里有点凑手难事，或者自己想要拼搏成才机会，在所有这些面临如何处理解决费用所需及家里财务担心的期间，有了这个亲朋礼可以寻求帮助就不用担心期间的房贷及生活费用，等等了。我个人认为对亲朋来说，这份初衷应该更实在一点。第一年（希望是2019年）的亲朋礼，就是每天只送最多两万五千美金，身体健康所需优先。第二年起每天最多五万美金，也是身体健康类优先。送礼是根据亲朋和我及我父母之间的亲疏而定额度，健康类优先是指优先安排所需款项（包括协助支付医疗保险费用），款项总额会根据我按亲疏定下的额度（每年及总额度）及亲朋自己实际情况考量，会诚实告知在此次健康送礼后多少时间内没有任何礼物。*这个亲朋礼不是慈善性质的，只限于私交亲朋。这几年治疗期间的经历也包括在内。
*目前据说已经由六个国家司法机构证实澄清为合法的生活费用给付，都是至少已经成立600年从未易过手的企业投资人的私人支出。从未易过手的意思就是指公司自成立起就从未更换过投资人也从未被美国任何富豪家族个人（方敏除外）拥有过。
如果有法律依据认为我方敏积欠了某些债务理应偿还，请债权人向债权人自己户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
如果有法律依据认为某些方家后人自己也是我方敏所继承某信托的受益人，请这些方家后人向你们各自的户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
2：那我过年过节是否还会送礼之类的？
我的回应：可能还会有一些社交往来的礼品支出，有限也只会局限于社交往来。
----2018年12月20日。
3：为何对有钱人的期待值如此高？
我的回应：我听到的好像都是认为可以由公司支付，认为是公司的公款支付又不是我自己的钱就没关系。我必须纠正这种说法，买了股票的人都知道，投资人的收益就是公司挣的钱扣除公司的支出，一旦公司支出过大，就是没有投资收益也就是投资人在赔钱，所以各国法律都是保障投资人利益而对公司支出有严格规定，我作为投资人，我有限的生活费用就是从我的信托的投资收益中领取的，如果再从公司里大笔支出礼品费用，也就是会减少了投资收益而让我的生活费用更有限了，所以我本人不愿意这种由公司支付礼品的方式，要知道所有这些超额公司支出费用按照法律都是必须从投资人自己的股东账户里扣除的，也就是从投资人自己的投资收益里扣除，那我的生活费用给付就少了，所以我本人不愿意，或者说我本人坚决拒绝这种做法。
----2018年12月20日。
4：是否由公司支付可以因为减少了应交的公司税而多点礼品费？
我的回应：各国的税务机关对此类企图都是查的很紧很紧，查到又都是重罚，所以不可能。
----2018年12月20日。
我方敏对我自己亲朋的送礼立场一直就是：送礼从来不是什么欠债必须还钱，更没有什么等不了送礼就居然上门敲诈勒索的，我方敏本人已经就我方敏所面对的“某明奇妙的就好像我欠了谁债似的”索钱压力而报警处理了。
如果有法律依据认为我方敏积欠了某些债务理应偿还，请债权人向债权人自己户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
如果有法律依据认为某些方家后人自己也是某信托的受益人，请这些方家后人向你们各自的户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
有些人说是我特意隐瞒遗嘱藏匿法律依据，所以他们根本没法上法庭。请问是谁的遗嘱又是以什么逻辑思维必须要查看否则是我藏匿证据？我爷爷1965年在上海逝世，我曾祖父是1930年在上海逝世，我曾曾祖父是在1907-1910年左右在上海逝世。因牵涉家里财产继承，这些爷爷去世时各个都是子孙环绕。请问究竟是那一代的祖父如今的在世子女有可能是在其当年的信托设立意愿书遗嘱里有可能被列为该信托的受益人名字所以需要查看核实，最迟的一份信托设立意愿书遗嘱是在1948年就定立了的？更何况，如果我居然藏匿遗嘱以私吞其他人财产就是已经构成刑事犯罪行为，是应该向公安机关举报查缉的，而不是到我这里恐吓要挟的。他们如此对我实施恐吓威胁敲诈勒索，居然还说是我私吞了他们财产？
*目前已经由六个国家司法机构证实澄清的合法给付，都是至少已经成立600年从未转手过的企业投资人私人支出。从未转手过的意思就是从未被美国任何富豪家族个人（方敏除外）拥有过。
----2018年12月17日。
12-19-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (2)
听说了一些亲朋还有一些疑问。也听说了今天早上每年一共就190万美金的说法，不知他们是从何处证实的那一笔，反正也是在说已经证实了我自己有钱了。
为何私人拥有的商业企业不可以随便给钱。
我的回应：因为商务经营的相关法律。
按照公司法，企业商业的公司财产拥有者是公司的工商登记上的法律投资人（公司），但不是公司工商登记上的法人代表，也不是公司的管理人员或管理团队。非国家直接经营的企业商业公司如上市股份公司及外资企业等等，即为私营企业商业公司。对这些私营企业商业公司的管理人员及管理团队而言，这些私营企业商业公司的固定资产公司银行存款等等都属于公款类别，受到严格的法律规章管辖，不可随便支出。
我听说的：按照法律，因为我的信托登记不是公开资料，我的信托由其美国所投资的企业支付我的生活费用需要由其上级投资链的六个国家司法当局证实该美国公司所支付款项是按投资人要求支付的私人钱财，并非公司款项。目前，我应受到的生活费用给付都已经按此要求被证实为合法给付，我本人也符合缴纳投资人税的条件。
----2018年12月19日。
如果我是投资人，为何投资人的亲朋不可以到私营企业工作。
我的回应：虽然我的信托是投资人而我是该信托的唯一受益人，但我本人不愿意。
首先，我作为信托的受益人，我本人并不参与信托所投资任何企业的经营管理，只是每年从信托的投资收益中领取生活费用，我本人也不愿意让那些辛苦工作的信托所投资任何企业的公司工作人员感觉被我派人监视了。
其次，就我在美国所知，只有500强上市股份企业有公共关系部门会就一些符合条件的直接投资人的姻亲关系予以一些工作安排，但我不是任何一家500强上市企业的直接投资人，所以，如果我本人的姻亲有类似想法都不符合条件。
我的建议，一些亲朋如果自己找工找到了我的一些信托所投资的企业公司，只要不和我特意多聊一些公司情况，公司各方也不会有任何负面想法，因为我也只是信托受益人而已，而我的信托和这些所投资公司特别是中国境内的所投资公司至少有六个国家之遥。
----2018年12月19日。
我本人是否会有4亿美元之巨的生活费用给付规模。
我的回应：应该有。我的信托在英国那个有军队配备的东印度公司最有名的一家法国投资公司里有一定规模的投资是真实，所谓真实就是其在美国的投资公司是我2004年继承经历的一部分，所以应该不会少于4亿美金每年。我听说的，钱已经转到了银行里我的名下，就是什么时候我本人可以使用。我也已经开始询问了。再强调一次，这不是什么有钱男人不想给的裤裆钱。
----2018年12月19日。
请参阅 12-18-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划
有关血缘关系送礼计划 （依据我听说的。如不正确，请在听说我收到4亿美元生活费用给付后送礼前予以纠正，共996.6万美元）
父系的方家血缘关系送礼计划草稿（共830.5万美元）（按当年分家时的兄弟人数算，不包括我下一代爷爷）：
三等亲（1907年-1911年左右分家，7人，共245万元）约每人35万元。
四等亲（5人, 共125万元）约每人25万元。
五等亲（6人，共108万元）约每人18万元。
六等亲（10人，122.5万元）约每人12万2千5百元。
七等亲（5人）八等亲（5人）九等亲（7人）十等亲（5人）。现在大约共有115人左右，共230万元。约每人2万元。
据说有方家相关某人的家属不愿其男人被我勾引但不受我的礼物就没钱，我的回应是你自己不愿被我勾引就别要礼物，否则怎么会认为我有钱送你们一家一份大礼还需要勾引你又老又没钱的男人？你他妈的算是什么狗屎？根本老母狗老娼妓老讨饭的。
都是方家血缘关系，都听听这些话，我送礼是为了找机会勾引她又老又丑的男人？不是花痴狗屎精神病人会有这种说法？她可是指着我的礼物买房之类的，我还需要勾引她的男人？我不可能客气的，我不可能不用现在这种态度回应的。
母系的血缘关系送礼计划草稿 (共166.1万美元）：
我外公王怀迎子女（不包括我母亲）( 11人，共88万) 约每人8万元。
其余（我外公王怀迎的1-4等亲，不包括我外公王怀迎）（现在大约有71人，共78.1万元）约每人1.1万元。
特别注意：这些礼物都是和我联系索取后才有，不需要礼物可以不与我联系索取。请在听说我收到每年4亿美金生活费后再与我联系，我也会在收到后在此博客公布。索取礼物时需提供血缘亲疏关系公证书及汇款方式（西联汇款，电汇等）。
1：如果不是提供商业银行账号让我直接付帐，请注意自己的财务信息安全。
2：美国有礼品赠与税，所以会有扣税。2019年，赠与税免税额为每人终身为一千一百四十万美元，每年为一万五千元。超过免税额者，应缴40%的赠与税。（http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/18/11/17/n10858852.htm）
3：非美国居民不用缴纳美国的礼品税，所以我会附件美国礼品税表格但不会代扣，由各位血缘关系亲朋自己处理。(12/20/2018更新)
----2018年12月19日。
我听说的：按照法律，因为我的信托登记不是公开资料，我的信托由其美国所投资的企业支付我的生活费用需要由其上级投资链的六个国家司法当局证实该美国公司所支付款项是按投资人要求支付的私人钱财，并非公司款项。目前，我应受到的生活费用给付都已经按此要求被证实为合法给付，我本人也符合缴纳投资人税的条件。
----2018年12月19日。
如果我是投资人，为何投资人的亲朋不可以到私营企业工作。
我的回应：虽然我的信托是投资人而我是该信托的唯一受益人，但我本人不愿意。
首先，我作为信托的受益人，我本人并不参与信托所投资任何企业的经营管理，只是每年从信托的投资收益中领取生活费用，我本人也不愿意让那些辛苦工作的信托所投资任何企业的公司工作人员感觉被我派人监视了。
其次，就我在美国所知，只有500强上市股份企业有公共关系部门会就一些符合条件的直接投资人的姻亲关系予以一些工作安排，但我不是任何一家500强上市企业的直接投资人，所以，如果我本人的姻亲有类似想法都不符合条件。
我的建议，一些亲朋如果自己找工找到了我的一些信托所投资的企业公司，只要不和我特意多聊一些公司情况，公司各方也不会有任何负面想法，因为我也只是信托受益人而已，而我的信托和这些所投资公司特别是中国境内的所投资公司至少有六个国家之遥。
----2018年12月19日。
我本人是否会有4亿美元之巨的生活费用给付规模。
我的回应：应该有。我的信托在英国那个有军队配备的东印度公司最有名的一家法国投资公司里有一定规模的投资是真实，所谓真实就是其在美国的投资公司是我2004年继承经历的一部分，所以应该不会少于4亿美金每年。我听说的，钱已经转到了银行里我的名下，就是什么时候我本人可以使用。我也已经开始询问了。再强调一次，这不是什么有钱男人不想给的裤裆钱。
----2018年12月19日。
请参阅 12-18-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划
有关血缘关系送礼计划 （依据我听说的。如不正确，请在听说我收到4亿美元生活费用给付后送礼前予以纠正，共996.6万美元）
父系的方家血缘关系送礼计划草稿（共830.5万美元）（按当年分家时的兄弟人数算，不包括我下一代爷爷）：
三等亲（1907年-1911年左右分家，7人，共245万元）约每人35万元。
四等亲（5人, 共125万元）约每人25万元。
五等亲（6人，共108万元）约每人18万元。
六等亲（10人，122.5万元）约每人12万2千5百元。
七等亲（5人）八等亲（5人）九等亲（7人）十等亲（5人）。现在大约共有115人左右，共230万元。约每人2万元。
据说有方家相关某人的家属不愿其男人被我勾引但不受我的礼物就没钱，我的回应是你自己不愿被我勾引就别要礼物，否则怎么会认为我有钱送你们一家一份大礼还需要勾引你又老又没钱的男人？你他妈的算是什么狗屎？根本老母狗老娼妓老讨饭的。
都是方家血缘关系，都听听这些话，我送礼是为了找机会勾引她又老又丑的男人？不是花痴狗屎精神病人会有这种说法？她可是指着我的礼物买房之类的，我还需要勾引她的男人？我不可能客气的，我不可能不用现在这种态度回应的。
我外公王怀迎子女（不包括我母亲）( 11人，共88万) 约每人8万元。
其余（我外公王怀迎的1-4等亲，不包括我外公王怀迎）（现在大约有71人，共78.1万元）约每人1.1万元。
特别注意：这些礼物都是和我联系索取后才有，不需要礼物可以不与我联系索取。请在听说我收到每年4亿美金生活费后再与我联系，我也会在收到后在此博客公布。索取礼物时需提供血缘亲疏关系公证书及汇款方式（西联汇款，电汇等）。
1：如果不是提供商业银行账号让我直接付帐，请注意自己的财务信息安全。
2：美国有礼品赠与税，所以会有扣税。2019年，赠与税免税额为每人终身为一千一百四十万美元，每年为一万五千元。超过免税额者，应缴40%的赠与税。（http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/18/11/17/n10858852.htm）
3：非美国居民不用缴纳美国的礼品税，所以我会附件美国礼品税表格但不会代扣，由各位血缘关系亲朋自己处理。(12/20/2018更新)
----2018年12月19日。
12-18-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划
听说今天早上的中文播出提到我的生活费用给付全部都已经核实为合法给付，也就是我就等着通知我领取了。希望快点。
有人问为何要由政府核实是否合法给付？
我的回答：就只是因为我的信托登记不是公开资料，所以需由一些相关国家的司法机关核实由该国的一些商业公司在美国所投资企业支出的私人给付是否合法以及我应以何种税率支付美国的个人所得税，等等。
有关我的送礼计划，我是固定了每年两千万美金，包括一次性的血缘关系送礼。亲戚的礼物我已经在2004年就已经表态会在2015年左右送出，延迟并非我本人所愿，中间一些变故各方也都已经表态。
我个人认为血缘关系并不是亲戚关系，但这不是在说我排斥友善的血缘关系，所以，血缘关系礼虽然只有一次，但我欢迎他们继续向我索取心仪的亲朋礼（因担心亲朋会有一些累积的健康类紧急用钱需要，第一年可能会除外）。
父系一次性血缘关系送礼计划（总值约670万元美金）：
我父系方家一等亲，二等亲以及我奶奶娘家兄弟（我父母称呼为舅舅舅妈的）都被我称为亲戚，已在2004年表态愿意送礼。
我父系方家三至五等亲，血缘关系礼总值约335万美金左右。
我父系方家六至十等亲，血缘关系礼总值约335万美金左右。
母系一次性血缘关系送礼计划（总值约165万元美金）：
我外祖父王怀迎亲生子女，血缘关系礼总值约65万元美金
我母亲王博贤父系一至四等亲，血缘关系礼总值约100万元美金。(我母亲的妈妈是我母亲童年不快乐的根本原因，所以没有我母亲母系的血缘关系礼）
亲朋礼（第一年总额约1165万美金左右，以后每年2000万美金），
我会根据各位与我本人及我父母的亲善友好关系决定并诚实告知我愿意送礼的规模（一次性或者每年，等等）。
欢迎各位亲朋在听说我已经收到每年4亿美金的生活费用给付后与我联系索取心仪礼物。目前确定的联络电邮是somebodyinma@gmail.com 和 somebodyinBoston@gmail.com
请注意事项：
1：如果不是提供商业银行账号让我直接付帐，请注意自己的财务信息安全。
2：美国有礼品赠与税，所以会有扣税。2019年，赠与税免税额为每人终身为一千一百四十万美元，每年为一万五千元。超过免税额者，应缴40%的赠与税。（http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/18/11/17/n10858852.htm）
----2018年12月18日。
我方敏对我自己亲朋的送礼立场一直就是：送礼从来不是什么欠债必须还钱，更没有什么等不了送礼就居然上门敲诈勒索的，我方敏本人已经就我方敏所面对的“某明奇妙的就好像我欠了谁债似的”索钱压力而报警处理了。
如果有法律依据认为我方敏积欠了某些债务理应偿还，请债权人向债权人自己户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
如果有法律依据认为某些方家后人自己也是某信托的受益人，请这些方家后人向你们各自的户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
有些人说是我特意隐瞒遗嘱藏匿法律依据，所以他们根本没法上法庭。请问是谁的遗嘱又是以什么逻辑思维必须要查看否则是我藏匿证据？我爷爷1965年在上海逝世，我曾祖父是1930年在上海逝世，我曾曾祖父是在1907-1910年左右在上海逝世。因牵涉家里财产继承，这些爷爷去世时各个都是子孙环绕。请问究竟是那一代的祖父如今的在世子女有可能是在其当年的信托设立意愿书遗嘱里有可能被列为该信托的受益人名字所以需要查看核实，最迟的一份信托设立意愿书遗嘱是在1948年就定立了的？更何况，如果我居然藏匿遗嘱以私吞其他人财产就是已经构成刑事犯罪行为，是应该向公安机关举报查缉的，而不是到我这里恐吓要挟的。他们如此对我实施恐吓威胁敲诈勒索，居然还说是我私吞了他们财产？
----2018年12月17日。
12-17-2018 O'Connors True Anger has been...
I heard my yesterday's blog article has made some O's shade their tears and I also heard a lot of people do think that was a horrible scene, and why it has to be like that.
O's confusion has been almost 200 years long stories. On July 1st of 2004, when O's angrily emphasized, again and again, that they disagree I had inherited that company already and they refused to spend that money as I wished, there was not a single person made a sound but my spending continued. This horrible scene has angered O's for all this time since that day.
The reason nobody made a sound was because
1:) O's confusion has been almost 200 years' long, full of stories and fights.
2:) I did not inherit that American company, that American company has been owned entirely by its British Investor company for about 400 years. What I inherited is a Trust that has been investing in that American company through its upstream investors' chain, but not the American company itself.
3:) It was already very obvious at the moment that I did not intend to spend their money and it would be ensured not their money.
I am so sorry for that horrible feeling from this. Please let be known if there were similar horrible scenes. That horribleness was not because of any negativeness from all those insensitive everyone.
----Dec. 17th, 2018
听说了上海方面对我是唯一受益人的困扰。
我的回应：我爷爷方智仁是在1948年就已经将钱款转入我本人名下而不是我父亲方文海名下，用的是我的小名女掌设立的信托（也就是存款单）并附图注明了”女掌“这个女孩是其长子方文海这支所育的有家族胎记掌纹的一个孙女。我爷爷最大的一个孙子女是在1964年出生，但我爷爷方智仁直至去世都没有改变信托是为方智仁自己的小名“女掌”的孙女所设立的意愿。我其他爷爷替我所设立的信托也是一样，都是在办理信托时就已经将钱款转入了小名女掌的孙女名下并附图说明了谁才是这个小名女掌的孙女。所以我方敏是我所继承的这些信托的唯一受益人。
我是2004年继承的，所继承的是爷爷信托特意给我的财产。解释如下：我父亲方文海2004年身体健康根本就没有去世所以就根本没有任何我父亲方文海的财产可以被任何人在2004年继承。我爷爷方智仁是1965年去世，我爷爷方智仁亲生子女都已经在1965年各自按照方智仁本人遗嘱继承了方智仁自己所分配的，方智仁自己名下的所有全部方智仁自己所遗留下的财产。我所继承的信托是按照爷爷方智仁的愿望在1948年就已经特意给了我的财产，我爷爷方智仁直至1965年去世都没有改变这份愿望也从未更改该信托的设立意愿书（遗嘱）。我其他爷爷也是类似。
信托受益人的意思就是所信托的财产已经委托他人管理，信托受益人只是每年从该信托领取生活费用，但不介入所信托财产的经营管理。我方敏作为这些信托的唯一受益人，不介入我所继承的这些信托所投资企业的业务经营管理。
我方敏已经表明了在收到我的信托给付的每年生活费用后，会在此博客宣布向我的亲朋送礼的方式以方便亲朋向我索取心仪礼物。但我方敏必须强调我方敏没有欠了亲朋钱财，我方敏也不会允许任何人以我方敏名义敲诈勒索任何企业。我所继承这些信托所投资的企业也都非常清楚我方敏立场，也就是我方敏自己的亲朋我方敏自己送礼，我方敏自己有钱就不会需要企业的工作人员用他们自己有限的工资或者办公经费替我送礼。
我方敏对我自己亲朋的送礼立场一直就是：送礼从来不是什么欠债必须还钱，更没有什么等不了送礼就居然上门敲诈勒索的，我方敏本人已经就我方敏所面对的“某明奇妙的就好像我欠了谁债似的”索钱压力而报警处理了。
如果有法律依据认为我方敏积欠了某些债务理应偿还，请债权人向债权人自己户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
如果有法律依据认为某些方家后人自己也是某信托的受益人，请这些方家后人向你们各自的户籍所在地的当地法庭诉诸法律。
有些人说是我特意隐瞒遗嘱藏匿法律依据，所以他们根本没法上法庭。请问是谁的遗嘱又是以什么逻辑思维必须要查看否则是我藏匿证据？我爷爷1965年在上海逝世，我曾祖父是1930年在上海逝世，我曾曾祖父是在1907-1910年左右在上海逝世。因牵涉家里财产继承，这些爷爷去世时各个都是子孙环绕。请问究竟是那一代的祖父如今的在世子女有可能是在其当年的信托设立意愿书遗嘱里有可能被列为该信托的受益人名字所以需要查看核实，最迟的一份信托设立意愿书遗嘱是在1948年就定立了的？更何况，如果我居然藏匿遗嘱以私吞其他人财产就是已经构成刑事犯罪行为，是应该向公安机关举报查缉的，而不是到我这里恐吓要挟的。他们如此对我实施恐吓威胁敲诈勒索，居然还说是我私吞了他们财产？
----2018年12月17日。
12-16-2018 Money lawful ownership never changes upon confusion（财产的法律拥有权从不因困扰而改变）
If I have money should be the matter of lawful ownership, not upon personal authentication to own or be dis-owned.
Money ownership change has been strictly law matter throughout history, never eligible to be changed upon personal opinions.
Example of lawful ownership never change upon confusion：
The British East India Company, the one with the troops, has never changed its ownership, nor its most famous French Financier company's American Investment. The British East India Company's most famous French Financier company's British investment has been the owner of this American Investment for over 400 years. My shared ownership confusion with O' name since July 1st of 2004 about this American Investment never changed its lawful ownership. Both O' name and I have changed both sides sayings about the matter after its lawful owner, the French Financier company's British Investment, has clarified the ownership confusion. I never won the argument of who actually owns this American Investment from O' name. I just backed off quietly from its lawful ownership. O' name has been closely associated with this American company's investment decisions for almost two centuries was the reason for their confusion, my inherited Trust has been investing in the company was the reason for my confusion. There have been a lot of uncomfortable feelings from O' name after my anxiety outbreak,
I publicly apologize sincerely to O' name for all my misbehaves during my anxiety outbreak.
----Dec. 16th, 2018
Also, I heard this morning's broadcasting of arranged child announcement. It is funny that nobody even knows who can be that child, or if ever exists. Nobody even needs to ask who or why need to make such arranged child announcement, the reason is already well-known for year-s "too many on-air time but no contents".
----Dec 16th, 2018
Currently, I still don't know who is demanding fiercely for "same equal ownership" for everything I lawfully solely own, not really from my maiden name but definitely from China. Everything means my male, my residence house, my dresses, etc. I have been named a whore-level concerned person to prevent me to go to any residence that is owned by those who have no association with me for over 20 or 30 years already, but my residence house and my male have been publicly demanded "should be open for sharing is those Chinese married females' basic right", with the help from some R-names.
All these angry toned expressions "I don't want you to see my husband or my house, I am sensitive about it all. But I have to come to your house, I am his wife and capable to bear a child biologically is already proved." Who the fxxx is this?
----Dec 16th, 2018
我有钱没钱都是法律所决定的，不由任何人的个别意愿所授权拥有或者所剥夺而失去。
财产法律拥有权的改变一直都是严格的法律管辖事务，从来不因个人的意见需求而改变。
举例说明财产的法律拥有权从不因困扰而改变：
美国的欧家人和我之间对于英国的东印度公司（就是有军队的那个）最著名的法国投资公司在美国所投资的企业的法律拥有权困扰是从2004年7月1日就开始了。在英国东印度公司的法国投资公司的英国下属投资公司出面说明后，欧家人和我都纠正了各自的说法。我从未在这场谁才拥有这家美国公司的争执中吵赢了欧家人，我就只是在该公司的法定拥有权的主人出面澄清后就退却没再吵了。欧家人参与这家美国公司的投资决策都已经有近两个世纪了，所以他们有点困绕，而我是因为继承了一个一直都有投资该公司的信托而困扰了。吵过之后欧家人对我是很生气了。
我在此公开郑重为我自己惊慌失措时所有的不恰当行为向欧家人公开道歉。
----2018年12月16日。
听听这些所谓中国已婚女人的愤怒声音：“我就是不愿意你见我的丈夫（父亲）或者到我家里来，我就是介意。可我就是一定要到你家，我是他的老婆（女儿）有生孩子能力已经证明了（或者是可以证明给你看的）。"这究竟是哪个老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的愤怒声音？
居然公开号召，公开宣传说只要是我同一个中学大学工作单位的同学校友同事就可以如此要求，不管是不是朋友或者毕业后辞职后有没有任何联络？他们是同学校友同事？根本就是一群老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的而已。我就是一定会就此申请法庭禁制令。我家就是不需要你们这些老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的。
有人说这些愤怒是因为看不惯我说自己有钱是想要有钱男人自己并不想给的裤裆钱，我就奇怪如果你们看不惯，你们怎么各个都是一副你们自己才是真正有奶子屁股的真正中国，所以就是应该把钱拿走，至少也是平分共享的态度？如果你们不是一群老娼妓老母狗老讨饭的，你们怎么会因为瞧不起我的钱有可能是有钱男人自己都不想给的裤裆钱就把你们自己的奶子屁股塞进来一定要求分享？
请参阅 12-06-2018 和南京方面的矛盾（7） ---- 南京药检所及其他
还有，就是所有这些一副曾经认识过我就有欠债所以必须还钱的声音，请说明究竟欠了你们什么债，多少价码？需要如何还清？定价的理由及依据是什么？
南京师范大学附属中学高中毕业的绝大多数（包括罗雪梅），南京四中初中毕业的绝大多数，以及上海医大毕业的绝大多数，和我都是从无各自之间的婚姻家庭社交往来，也永远不会有任何必须的类似社交往来。
南京四中初中毕业的王朝晖是因为可能曾以我朋友身份协助我弟弟的婚姻家庭虐待我母亲王博贤而被我永远拒绝往来。
南京四中初中毕业的胡宁因和中国总理李克强的婚姻家庭是亲密朋友关系而被我拒绝往来。
请参阅 是否是为了谋财害命？
----Dec. 16th, 2018
12-15-2018 我奶奶从来没有爱上丁姓私人助理
听说了今天早上所提到的，
有人问：我是否有指控中国的国务院总理李克强是在谋财害命。
我的回应：是，如果在2013年9月20日前后一个星期左右的时间里，当时已经80多岁的我父亲被中国的国务院总理李克强拉上总理的小轿车后，再在车子启动慢速行驶的情况下将我父亲推下车来造成我父亲头部着地摔在街上是真实，我就是在2017-2018年间听说后就已经通过以电邮向纽约的中国领事馆投诉此事而指控中国国务院总理李克强谋财害命未遂。我父亲的“死亡证书”开具时间是2013年10月3日。
----2018年12月15日。
有人问我奶奶毛阿妹为何愿意和丁姓私人助理交往？两人是否有性关系？一些相关博文是否在指控丁姓私人助理涉嫌为谋财而谋杀了我爷爷方智仁以及我奶奶毛阿妹。
我的回应：我听说两人有性关系是丁姓私人助理家人因为拥有两人性交关系证据而态度强硬的原因。我也听说了第一次发生是我奶奶独自一人在家时，在她自己的卧房里被卡着脖子摁在床上强奸。
我奶奶因为常年面对很多女性逼我爷爷“为爱离婚”的压力，个性很强。我相信她不是自愿和一个已经是三个孩子父亲的37岁长相粗陋，就只有五年制小学毕业文化程度又是被我爷爷雇佣的一个私人助理有什么恋爱关系。我爷爷是大学毕业很清秀和我奶奶同岁又是指腹为婚成年即成亲了，我奶奶自己是初中毕业文化程度，她很清楚其他那些女性听说会是什么态度。虽然我奶奶在家里家外一直都是母后娘娘“不可能离婚”的待遇，那些女性每次看我奶奶大手笔花她自己的零用钱而评论我奶奶“就只是有钱而已”的愤怒还是会经常让我奶奶感受到很大压力。
我是在博文里分析指控丁姓私人助理可能涉嫌为谋财而谋杀了我爷爷方智仁以及我奶奶毛阿妹。我听说的： 我爷爷奶奶两人都是因为小恙被丁姓私人助理送进医院后就必须住院治疗，我爷爷奶奶都是投诉他在他们两人各自住院期间不准我爷爷奶奶在医院里花我爷爷奶奶自己的钱而且因为什么原因就是不能出院回家，两人也都是再也没有回家，两人都是死在医院里（1958 和1965），我父亲及其弟妹应继承的钱财被丁姓私人助理所拥有或所支配都是在1965年我爷爷去世前后，不是1958年。
----2018年12月15日。
有人问我是否因此而担心我现在的脑控癌治疗？
我的回应：我因为此治疗而安全。脑控癌治疗技术是远程技术，不需要登记住院就有可能会担心“谁在治疗？”。而我因为提供治疗的单位而安全了。
我在此提醒方家亲戚方家后人请注意自己人身安全，我自己已经就自己的怀疑及指控而报警求助了。
----2018年12月15日。
听说了我父亲弟妹询问她本人的生活费用应该由谁支付？
我的回应：我所继承的信托里没有我父亲或者我父亲弟弟妹妹的任何钱款，所以我不知道我父亲弟弟的妻子生活费用应该由谁支付。我本人在收到2004年香港汇出的钱款后会安排处理我自己在2004年所表达的愿意送礼事宜，我不清楚他们收到后会如何安排他们各自的生活费用。在我的礼物未送出前，我父亲弟弟妹妹没收到礼钱就不是因为一些外在原因而符合法律调查条件，所以就不会有任何司法协助。我的父母子女是我的法律责任义务所瞻养所抚养，所以如果我的一些收入因为某些原因没有收到且符合法律调查条件，我的父母子女因为依靠我的收入才能生活所以会有相应的司法协助维持基本生活。
据说还有王姓人士就是够资格和我要钱。我只强调我方敏没欠我外公王怀迎的任何子女的任何钱款，更未欠了两三百年前什么山东王姓人士后人的任何钱款。91%DNA至少是8个曾的九等亲血缘关系，也就是200年前的什么血缘关系，他们据说就是认定我母亲姓王又漂亮，他们也姓王一定都漂亮，所以居然要我因此给付至少每月1万美金，这可是在我已经宣布一年一共就两千万美金的经费之后。我又没长个男阳具，也没欠了王家的吊钱，这些王姓人士根本就是一群居然指望着他们才是正宗可以靠舔吊讨饭的娼妓老母狗而已。我方敏就是这态度就是这么明确告诉那些王家人，你们他妈的又算老几，一群讨饭的娼妓老母狗老讨饭的而已，也配要美金一万每月？我方敏就是不会怕了你们王家人就是多的威胁恐吓。我方敏坚决拒绝王姓人士的任何类似敲诈勒索要求。
----2018年12月15日。
12-14-2018 Other than eyes, nose and mouth, I resemble my father impressively (除了五官，我和我父亲长得是在太像了）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting, how many birthmarks I may carry.
Well, I know I am after my father in almost everyway, in ways how we turn and how we move, in ways how we sit and how we stand, and in ways how we talk and how we are looking at.
Not only I have my father's palms as birthmark, I also have my father's forehead which may also a family birthmark: Both my father and his youngest sister have this family forehead from my grandfather so distinctive, even though it is definitely not abnormally huge at all (not even a five-head), that the first impression of seeing anyone of us approaching is the dominant impression of such a huge forehead, then is our looks.
And, I have alot more such distinctive places on my appearance from my father that may also be our family birthmarks.
听说了今天早上播出的内容，就是我身上还有多少家族胎记。
我和我父亲很像很像，我们的言谈举止，坐姿立式，回眸抬眉，都是像的不得了。
不只我有我父亲的掌纹胎记，我也有和我父亲一模一样的的大脑门前额，估计也是家里的胎记。我父亲和他的小妹妹都有和我的爷爷一模一样的大脑门前额，虽然不是大到感觉脸都有点畸形的那种(连五指宽都没到），但是真的是很显眼的，就是你要是第一次看见我们当中的任何一个，向你走过来的时候你就会有一个非常深刻的第一影响，就是这人的脑门前额好大啊，然后你才会看见我们的五官长得什么样。
我身上还有好多类似非常明显的和我父亲相似的地方，可能也是我们的家族胎记。
----Dec. 14th, 2018
有人说王博真去世我也没听说，怎么不愤怒啊？
我的回答：因为我很清楚不告诉我王博真去世消息是王博真本人及其全家特意所为的，就为了不让我听说了什么消息后冲到南京去抢了王博真自己从来没打算给我的东西。我哪里会有一丝一毫的难过啊？
我父亲的情况就不一样了，我父亲“2013年去世前”都不需要知道我是否还活着，我也不需要知道我父亲任何情况，就只为了让我父亲无助，让我父亲心寒，让我父女俩永远都知道并且永远记住我们从来都不受中华人民共和国的欢迎，我爷爷方智仁当初留在中华人民共和国是个永远应该后悔的决定而已。我的愤怒就是中华人民共和国还是一个宪法有效的法治国家吗？我相信我父母和我的子女也确实是永远都会记得。
这也就是我方敏对传闻中的彭丽媛近期在美国的国宴上所做的“她也就是自作多情（"she is just self-indulging"（再英译中一次意思就又成了“她也就只有自摸自摸而已”)”说法的正式回应了。
----2018年12月14日
12-13-2018 Why I am so miserable if I do have my own money?
Why I am so miserable if I do have my own money? The answer is very simple, the R-names plus their in-laws and their cousins made the headcounts over 400, but I am one individual.
How come my Trusts' businesses don't come to the rescue? They are already at wherever R-investments are harassing.
The huge issue is the personal phone-calls and on-foot friends-visiting from over 400 R-names'(including associated), but I have already sent out over 100 emails to call police officers to help out.
Exactly, what has been the story? It is all about whose money I have been provided for. Have you noticed, one-child-only families among R-names are much relaxed and easy to believe I have my own money? The reason? Because it is indeed very easy to verify it is never their money. But for those R-names families who have several children, well, you heard those adult children's screams "We are going to find out exactly whose money" on the radio for over 5 years, my responsive howling "I have my own money" for over 3 years (one year on the radio, two years on my web blog).
What was the story on July 1st of 2004? A lot said if my Illustrated story of July 1st of 2004 was what happened, normally there would be some questions asked from the "CEO's group" and there would be some proudness from "my colleagues' group", especially when both groups are American businesses.
So, what was exchanged on July 1st of 2004?
CEO started screaming: "I said I am not going to spend that money".
I started laughing and continued: "I want to have...."
Angry CEO's group to CEO: "Not going to be our spending. Guarantee you."
My colleagues' group: "She got her own money good."
Obviously know both party group to CEO: "Promised not going to be your money. Don't worry about it."
Mild CEO's group: "What is the business?"
Proud my colleagues' group proudly: "(pronunciation) The Pinctos."
Mild CEO's group all puzzled: "Never heard of."
Proud my colleagues' group: "What is yours?"
Mild CEO's group proudly (Accurate recording here): "The Center."
Proud my colleagues' group all bewildered: "Never heard of"and "That is a building!"
Outsider group I (Chinese government) look at everybody and concluded: "She is spending the money that American rich never even intend to give."
Outsider group II (worldwide business and non-business groups) kept blinking their eyes: "What is The Pinctos? What is The Center? What is going on here?"
What happened since that day? The angry exchange "Whose money????" and "Never your money!!!!" between R-investments and my Trusts' businesses for over 14 years now (all American business for both groups), the R-names determination to clarify "never Min Fang's money" on the radio, and my howling "I have my own birth Chinese grandfathers' gifts."
The Pinctos (pronunciation) is a Financial Institute's name, The Center is the famous Rockefeller Center in NYC.
This is the story that has been recorded in that day's teleconference record.
----Dec. 13th, 2018
我是2017年5月至6月间在波士顿96.9FM上才听懂洛克菲勒家的气愤是因他们认为我2004年7月1日这天不经他们家任何人同意就花了他们很多钱，从那天起，所有和我那天花钱相关的人员都是一直在解释及处理。
----2018年12月13日。
据说很多南京师范大学附属中学的校友认为我在上海医科大学所学的只是药学医学类的专业教育，不可能是我能拿到非医药科技智慧产权收入的原因（化学及数理相关的)。
我的解释：看一下我在上海医科大学的药学院时念书时期的教材和课程安排就很清楚了。
1：第一年，高等数学，所使用教材是同济大学编辑，为其一年（两个学期）
2：第一年，无机化学，所使用教材是南京大学化学系编辑的教材（记不清了，也可能是南京师范大学或者华东师大），为其一年（两个学期）。
3：第二年，有机化学，教材是记不清了，为其一年（两个学期）。
4：第三年至第五年，所有基础医学类的教学内容，教材，老师及实验设施都是由上海医科大学（原上海第一医学院）自己的的基础医学部所提供的。药学类的教学内容，教材，老师及实验设施都是由上海医科大学（原上海第一医学院）自己的药学院所提供的。
5：电脑科技是在美国学的。当时高等数学可以免修就是因为大学里学高等数学时就是工程类院校所使用的同济大学所编辑的高等数学。化学类教材是师范大学化学系的使用教材。
6：我的语言才华：我爷爷中有文学才华横溢的唐玄宗李隆基，南唐后主“词帝”李煜是真实。我父亲方文海退休前也是做了多年的天文学报编辑。
----2018年12月13日。
12-12-2018 Why I still claim I have money after R-names are so publicly denounced me?（洛家人都已经一次次申明和我没有关系了，我怎么还在说自己有钱？）
Some asked what exactly is the confusion between me and Rockefeller's name.（中文附后）
My response: My July 1st of 2004's big spending. Let me illustrate what exactly is the confusion.
Example Setting: a nationwide computer seminar.
A CEO of a big computer company with his staff and me as a computer programmer together with my own colleagues from another independent computer company decided to go lunch together.
I started to spend money handsomely with cheers from my own colleagues who know my family is a well-known famous big company in the oil-chemistry industry but freaked out CEO and his staff. No one from my own colleagues realized what was the issue because my family business is a big company which they thought CEO should certainly know, and CEO's staff thought some of their own who do know about the oil-chemistry company are bad guys who were trying to please the new "attractive female" but completely ignore the possibility that the married CEO may not even be interested at all.
A lot of investments that my Trusts have invested in the United States are all started as foreign investments in America while Rockefeller's family business started as an authentic American business. All those "my own colleagues" who cheered my spending on July 1st of 2004 had all thought Rockefeller names' staff certainly knew I have my own money already while Rockefeller-names' staff thought some of their very familiar friends (Rockefellers' family business insiders) who also cheered my spending had completely ignored the fact that the married Mr. Rockefeller may not even interested in me.
That is all, but a lot of Rockefeller-names' staff are still struggling why I still claim I have my own money after so many Rockefellers have made so clear public denouncements. The good thing is it is clarified that all the money that had been spent as I wished for non-investment purpose on July 1st of 2004 were never owned by any Rockefeller's nor any Rockefellers' relatives including in-laws.
My anger has been why those from China or those graduated from the same high school or from the same college can state that they are the ones to know it can only be romance money if I dare to have some wealth.
And how a same high school graduated who is not even from same year can declare it can only be romance money if I dare to have intellectual incomes which are obviously earned by the knowledge I have learned from my college educations.
My anger has been why those from China or those graduated from the same high school or from the same college can state that they are the ones to know it can only be romance money if I dare to have some wealth.
And how a same high school graduated who is not even from same year can declare it can only be romance money if I dare to have intellectual incomes which are obviously earned by the knowledge I have learned from my college educations.
----Dec. 12th, 2018
中文大意：
究竟我和洛克菲勒家的矛盾是什么？
我的回答：矛盾就是我在2004年7月1日究竟花的是谁的钱。我来举例解释一下当时是怎么回事。
举例中的故事背景：一个全国性的电脑科技会议。
举例中故事相关人物：一家大型电脑集团的总裁和他的领导团队，我是另外一家独立的电脑企业的电脑程序员及我在那家电脑公司的同事们。
举例中的故事：总裁和他的领导团队以及我和我的同事们决定一起出去共进晚餐。
我们去了一家顶级餐厅，我就坐下开始大花钱，我的同事们因为很清楚我家里是一家私营大型石化企业的大老板，所以都跟着吆喝再多点一些好东西，却吓坏了总裁和他的领导团队。我和我的同事们都没意识到问题严重，也都以为总裁他们都知道那家石化企业也很大，而总裁和他的领导团队认为他们中的一些听说过那家石化企业的人是在讨好可能的新人，完全无视已婚的总裁对我可能完全没有任何兴趣。
我的信托所投资的企业都是作为外国投资在美国开始发展的，而洛克菲勒家企业是作为美国企业起家的。所有那些在2004年笑眯眯的看着我在2004年7月1日大花钱的那些“我的电脑公司同事们”都以为洛克菲勒家应该知道我已经继承了财产，而洛克菲勒家认为一些知道我已经继承财产的“那些他们自己人”是在讨好我这个可能的新人而完全忽视已婚的洛家人对我可能一点兴趣都没有。
就这些了，但洛克菲勒家企业的一些人还在愤怒洛家都已经如此公开宣布和我无关了，我怎么还在说自己有钱。好消息是2004年7月1日那些按我自己的意愿所花费的非投资款项都已经被证实既不是洛家人的钱，也不是洛家人亲戚们的钱。
我的愤怒就是：
1）为什么只要是同一个中国来的，同一个高中毕业的，或者同一所大学毕业的，在我一再解释之后，还在宣称他们特别清楚我只要说自己有钱就只能是在妄想我根本没有可能拿到的裤裆钱？
2）为什么同一个初中或者高中毕业的，甚至都不是一届毕业的，就可以宣称我没有可能挣到智慧产权收入的，只要我说我有钱就只能是在妄想我根本没有可能拿到的裤裆钱？
----2018年12月12日。
举例中的故事背景：一个全国性的电脑科技会议。
举例中故事相关人物：一家大型电脑集团的总裁和他的领导团队，我是另外一家独立的电脑企业的电脑程序员及我在那家电脑公司的同事们。
举例中的故事：总裁和他的领导团队以及我和我的同事们决定一起出去共进晚餐。
我们去了一家顶级餐厅，我就坐下开始大花钱，我的同事们因为很清楚我家里是一家私营大型石化企业的大老板，所以都跟着吆喝再多点一些好东西，却吓坏了总裁和他的领导团队。我和我的同事们都没意识到问题严重，也都以为总裁他们都知道那家石化企业也很大，而总裁和他的领导团队认为他们中的一些听说过那家石化企业的人是在讨好可能的新人，完全无视已婚的总裁对我可能完全没有任何兴趣。
我的信托所投资的企业都是作为外国投资在美国开始发展的，而洛克菲勒家企业是作为美国企业起家的。所有那些在2004年笑眯眯的看着我在2004年7月1日大花钱的那些“我的电脑公司同事们”都以为洛克菲勒家应该知道我已经继承了财产，而洛克菲勒家认为一些知道我已经继承财产的“那些他们自己人”是在讨好我这个可能的新人而完全忽视已婚的洛家人对我可能一点兴趣都没有。
就这些了，但洛克菲勒家企业的一些人还在愤怒洛家都已经如此公开宣布和我无关了，我怎么还在说自己有钱。好消息是2004年7月1日那些按我自己的意愿所花费的非投资款项都已经被证实既不是洛家人的钱，也不是洛家人亲戚们的钱。
我的愤怒就是：
1）为什么只要是同一个中国来的，同一个高中毕业的，或者同一所大学毕业的，在我一再解释之后，还在宣称他们特别清楚我只要说自己有钱就只能是在妄想我根本没有可能拿到的裤裆钱？
2）为什么同一个初中或者高中毕业的，甚至都不是一届毕业的，就可以宣称我没有可能挣到智慧产权收入的，只要我说我有钱就只能是在妄想我根本没有可能拿到的裤裆钱？
----2018年12月12日。
12-11-2018 如果其他方家后人和我要钱，都是爷爷后代，给我钱的爷爷们会帮谁？
听说了有些方家后人难以释怀，认为现在不骚扰就再也不会有钱了。
我的回答：现在骚扰，我也已经要求报警要求刑事调查是否敲诈勒索，我也不会客气。我是按每一个爷爷的遗嘱继承每一个爷爷给我的钱，给我钱的这些爷爷们也没给我留下未还的风流欠债账单需要我来还，所以我是睬都不会睬这些要钱的要求的。
----2018年12月11日。
至于说是爷爷的钱，如果他们就是一定要，都是爷爷后代方家后人，给钱的爷爷会帮谁？
我的回答：爷爷只帮我方敏是肯定的。因为爷爷对所有的孙子辈都不认识，钱是爷爷自己的钱，他想给的是我方敏，就不会帮他其他的孩子和我抢钱。他自己的儿子女儿一辈，他也都已经按他自己心愿给予，也不会帮他们和我抢钱。
我所有的爷爷中，也就只有方智仁这个爷爷有子女这一辈还在世，也就只有这个爷爷把他自己大部分的钱都给了我，可我送礼也很大方啊，方智仁爷爷和毛阿妹奶奶绝对不是够资格抱怨我小气的一个，他们又没给我多少，方智仁爷爷1948年就给了我一共就1500万美金，而我2004年愿意给他孩子们的礼物一人就是8000万美金还多（就是五亿人民币），从礼物里扣钱是因为他的孩子们为钱和我闹腾，就算是方智仁爷爷在世，我都会坚持就是要按闹腾的程度扣钱。其他给我钱的爷爷们统统都是方智仁爷爷自己的祖宗，也不是方智仁爷爷够资格帮任何人要钱要东西吵闹骂砸的。
----2018年12月11日。
至于说是丁姓私人助理的家人究竟算什么？凭什么我不算他们是家人？
我的回答：丁姓私人助理一家从来不是方家的任何人。
第一，我方敏的每月一万美金生活费用（1967-1996）不是毛阿妹丈夫方智仁的钱，不是毛阿妹自己的钱，也不是毛阿妹娘家给的嫁妆，所以，我所有的爷爷奶奶都会帮着我方敏。一切也都已经由美国的汇款公司依据法律在进行处理。
第二，方智仁替我方敏所设立的信托是由方智仁所继承的其父亲所给予方智仁的财产所设立，由方智仁自己的血脉传承方敏所拥有是方智仁自己的意愿。方智仁从无意愿雇佣任何人作为他自己的妻子毛阿妹的性交伙伴，更无意愿让方家财产被丁姓私人助理家人掠夺。我方敏按照方智仁遗嘱所继承的信托财产从来不是丁姓私人助理的钱财。我所有的爷爷奶奶也都是只会帮我方敏。
第三，我方敏骂了毛阿妹，一点不会担心毛阿妹生气更不会担心毛阿妹报复我，就因为丁姓私人助理是个又老又丑的。我听说的，50年代的他当时都已经37岁了，不光是已婚，都还已经有了三个孩子，长得就像于是之，从来不是什么英俊小生。我爷爷奶奶天天被他们全家五口白吃白喝还天天饭桌上被他们出言顶撞公然挑衅。我就是一直在问我奶奶当年作为有钱人家的太太，想找男人玩玩气气一辈子都是花花公子的我爷爷，为什么不找个年轻英俊的演员或者漂亮小伙之类，怎么还被他们一家骂到惨不忍听？当年究竟是怎么回事？据说丁姓私人助理当时150-200元的工资是我爷爷支付，他老婆一个月纺织厂女工的工资只有5元至13元的人民币。1948年替我这个孙女设立信托后，我爷爷就已经把绝大多数的钱转入我奶奶名下，我奶奶当时和他们一家是没法比的富裕。我奶奶1958年突然在家晕倒被丁姓私人助理送医院后留院治疗，我爷爷才紧急把钱全部转回他自己名下。
----2018年12月11日。
12-10-2018 Why my living is so shabby in Boston but kept on saying I am a wealthy person not on romance money? (我在波城过的是穷人日子怎么还老是说自己有钱但不是在妄想裤裆钱）
Heard this morning's talk about why I looked so shabby in Boston, Massachusetts.
When I am on a welfare standard, what else to expect but shabby? My anger has been it has been so loud on the radio that whenever anyone needs some money, it is so proudly on the radio to assign out my expected providing for living expenses as if I owe anyone of those demanded so much money. I have to clarify that I never owe them any money nor any living expenses providing is the only reason they can not file any lawsuit to demand money from a valid judicial court.
I think the root problem is why those prominent wives who have the privileged power to grab the microphone so expect themselves to be privileged enough to change "my money's" lawful ownership, as long as that is assumed my money and as long as they are really having acknowledged romances with really good men who are so willing to testify so with the emphasis on how my romance was never wanted, even after I kept on responding I never had such biological male part biologically on my biological female body? (meaning? I am obviously expected a truly privileged person to truly understand the value of such advertisement, but.....)
When there are no judicial arguments about the lawful ownership of this or that money,
When those prominent wives are not even privileged to file lawsuits to express their own opinions about lawful ownership of the money because those are the money they never own,
Why would they so expect themselves to be privileged to change the money's lawful ownership through a public microphone?
Why I have to live on social security's welfare because they are wives live on their own males but I am a female financially self-independent?
As those prominent males, including those who I have met and those who I never even heard of, already declared they never gave me a penny, they never intended to give me a penny and they determined never would give me a penny. And, I have to add loudly that I never demand any romance money from any male but kept saying I have inherited money since June 30th of 2004. So, I am a financially independent female.
As any financially independent person, my incomes comes from profession related which I call my intellectual property income and my inherited money from my birth Chinese grandfathers as their willed sole beneficiary person.
So, I ask these two questions out of my anger calmly:
Which one of these money-incomes that is claimed my money has any judicial argument(s) regarding its lawful ownership?
Why is this "privileged to take over to leave me penniless" if there is some money that is assumed my money?
Who is the privileged person can change the lawful ownership of which specific money from my incomes sources without my own willingness? I refuse that person's such privilege, for whoever that person might be.
I am so glad I am protected by LAWS, I am so happy I have great entrusting attorneys, I just need to cope with shabby living for the time being.
----Dec. 10th, 2018
Some said if he or she is the person who said I have money, this same person can change this person's such saying.
My response: I have to ask why this person said I have money in the past？ a reporting effort to say what this person had heard of? had verified of? And if so, how this person can deprive this reported money's lawful ownership by changing this person's own reporting of it?
Or had this person authorized me to have some money? then, what privileged this person to authorized what money to me? how much and where is that money should expect from? In the United States, unknown money source is a crime.
----Dec. 10th, 2018
Some said, how this paid-out is your money.
My explanation: I use an example to illustrate this for anyone who is not a business person.
An attorney registered a law firm and used this law firm bought a property as an office. This attorney can only claim to be the owner of this office property because of the ownership of the law firm.
It is the same to a commercial company A that is owned by another commercial company B, this means no one can claim to be the owner of the commercial company A unless this person is the owner of the commercial company B, and if this commercial company B is owned by the commercial company C, then, no one can claim to be the owner of the commercial company A unless being the owner of the commercial company C, and so on so forth.
Hope this can help clarify the confusion regarding the instructed paid-out money from those paying American companies. I heard it is proven those are all my lawful money already even though my Trust registry is not open to the public. How? I think that is law professionals specialty to answer, not me, at least not yet.
----Dec. 10th, 2018
中文大意：
据说今天早上提到我在麻州波士顿的生活很清贫，确实如此。我现在的生活标准是麻州民政救济部门的救济标准，还能是什么样的生活水平？
我的气愤：
只要认为有可能是我的钱，就来了一堆所谓人妻就是够资格把这钱给东给西到处送人或者归他们自己留着自用。好像我欠了他们多少钱似的。我只好在此声明，我从未欠过他们任何钱财是他们不够资格在有效的法庭上进行法律诉讼官司索取钱财的原因。
在这些钱财的法律所有权没有任何法学法理上的争议的情况下，在他们自己因为从来不是财产曾经的合法主人或者财产可能的合法主人，所以根本就不够资格上法庭就财产进行任何官司诉讼以表达他们自己就财产法律所有权的任何立场的情况下，为什么总是有这么一些所谓人妻因为有权有势能够抢的着公共频道的话筒就是够资格擅自更改钱财的法律所有权？在我一再强调我是个女的情况下，她们那里来的这份就凭“和某些好男人有性交经历且被好男人所认可，并且愿意广而告之此事实”就可以够资格拿光我的每一分钱收入，就是够资格让我本人过美国政府施援救助的救济水平的贫困生活？
在所有我见过的我听都没听说过的有钱男人一个个的宣布他们从没给过我钱，从未打算给我钱，也下定决心永远不给我钱之后，我本人再加上一句：我从未要过一分一毫的裤裆钱，而是从2004年6月30日起一直在宣称我是继承了财产。所以，我说我方敏自己是一个财务独立的女性。
就像所有财务独立的人一样，我的收入来源有两种，一种是职业相关的，也就是我称为智慧产权的收入，还有就是我自己家里传承的，也就是我宣称我是我爷爷们遗嘱指定的唯一受益人所继承到的财产。
因为法律的保护，我现在是已经可以隐忍愤怒很平静的问几个问题了：
第一：我的上述收入来源里哪一笔钱，就其法律拥有权归属是有法学法理上的争议的？
第二：又是哪一个人有如此权势可以在我本人不愿意的情况下任意改变我的合法财产所有权让我本人身无分文？也就是为什么只要是认为有可能是我的钱，这人那人就是够资格直接擅自更改其法律所有权？究竟是哪一笔钱又是凭的什么资格？不管这人是谁，我方敏本人坚决拒绝这个人的任何资格。
真是很开心，我其实一直有受到法律的保护，我有这么好的信托律师真实很幸运。
----2018年12月10日。
有人说，如果是因为我说你有钱，你就一直说你有钱，那我现在就改口。
我的回答：那我就地问你，你当初为什么会说我有钱？是在报道你所听说过的，你所证实过的吗？那你为什么认为现在你只要自己改口就可以改变你所报道过的该钱财的法律所有权？
或者你只是你自己在授权我可以有钱，那我就需要问你是以什么身份授权我可以有点钱？是什么钱？多少钱？钱应该从哪里来？在美国，不明来源的钱是会被作为可能是犯罪的收入而被警方刑事调查的。
----2018年12月10日。
12-06-2018 和南京方面的矛盾（7） ---- 南京药检所及其他
听说了今天早上所播出。
听说了南京药检所是今天早上对我敏居然号称有钱予以驳斥“谁会给钱？”
我方敏的回答：
既然方敏的钱不是你们中的任何一个裤裆里给出来的，也不是你们中间的哪一个人从某个有钱男人的裤裆里讨出来的，你们又都已经表达立场你们不是我方敏的任何朋友也不会在乎我方敏利益，我方敏的钱是怎么回事就和你们这些人都无关了。
一切依据法律，财产所有权应该是由法律所决定的。既然你们统统都不是法学专业人士，就请不要招摇撞骗社会大众似乎你们才是法律权威一切事务的专家。
1：1990年认识的南京药检所陶光耀：我对你从来没有任何性需求也没有任何的性要求，自1996年至今也没有任何联络，你既然已经表明不是朋友的立场，我方敏也没有任何社交或者工作需要和你有任何联络，更没有任何需要认识你的婚姻家庭让你的妻子承受如此压力表达如此立场。我方敏在此声明我和1990年认识的南京药检所陶光耀本人及其婚姻家庭没有任何关系。请相信这是真实。
（听说了中国大陆很多人听不明白今天早上播出的就此的分析探讨，说我很过分。
我方敏的回应：请回答我的三个问题来进行你们的评论：
1）：在陶光耀的老婆已经强调担心我会勾引陶光耀甚至武力强奸了陶光耀的情况下，为何必须和陶光耀本人保持联络？
2）：在我都还从未听说陶光耀老婆是谁就已经面对如此敌意的情况下，为何必须由陶光耀的老婆和做我朋友和我交往到我家里探视？如果你对陶光耀老婆的奶子屁股既没有性要求又没有性需求的情况下，做老婆的又已经在其丈夫公婆全家的支持下言辞强硬的拒绝了你去他们夫妻亲友家里及他们的社交场合里强奸了做丈夫的任何机会的情况下，你会认为陶光耀的老婆有如此需要必须有权利到你家里探视吗？为什么？我为何必须和陶光耀的老婆有任何联系任何交往关系而且必须是只准和陶光耀的老婆一个人交往？
3）：为何中国大陆听不懂陶光耀夫妻双方及陶光耀家人就此所表达的共同立场？
4）：还有，据说做儿女的担心我强奸了他或她的父亲，只能自己出面必须到我家里探视的，我对这些做儿女的也是一样地回答：我对你的父亲从来不曾有过任何性需求或者性要求，对你也是永远不会有任何性需求任何性要求，不会需要你。如果情况严重，我会申请法庭的禁制令，就是不会允许你上门到我这里勾引我！！！！
5：）有人说这根本是在表达永远不会是朋友甚至从此不曾相识的意思和立场，我方敏的态度也是：又有什么了不起的？人情世故确实都是早就已经“时过境迁“，不过谈不上是”物是人非”般的吓死人而已。至于如有牵涉到法律的问题，也就是一切依据法律聘用代表律师处理就可以，也是不需亲自出面不需要有任何交往机会。
总结：) 究竟我是什么意思？我的意思就是，既然一切都不是误会，陶光耀妻子就是如此立场，从现在起，我不曾认识陶光耀，也不需要认识陶光耀的妻子家人亲朋。我的意思就是我从来不曾认识陶光耀这个人，不用向我价绍谁是陶光耀的什么人，因为我根本就不认识陶光耀这个人是谁。就是这个意思。
至今广播剧上高调宣布的也全部都是这个意思，从来没有任何难以理解的中英语言，也从来没有任何被错误理解的逻辑表达。
----2018年12月7日更新）
2：上海医科大学90届药理班的李健泽：我对你从来没有任何性需求也没有任何的性要求，自1999年至今也没有任何联络，你既然已经表明不是朋友的立场，我方敏也没有任何社交或者工作需要和你有任何联络，我方敏在此声明我和上海医科大学90届药理班的李健泽本人及其婚姻家庭没有任何关系。请相信这是真实。
3：1990-91年认识的南京药检所李昌江，相淞华，南京四中初中班主任陈师的儿子以及周洪良父子：
我方敏有钱没钱都和你们没有任何关系，我方敏活着是不会需要让你们支付我方敏的一餐一食，死了也不会需要你们支付我方敏的丧葬费用，更没有任何需要和你们有任何社交或者工作上的交往。我私人确实是没有任何需有你们这些人在我生活中存在的原因，也就是没有任何与你们电话电邮或者见面的需要*。请相信这是真实。（*没有办法，不写这句就有人吆喝“一辈子不见你”好像是我有需要不见他们不行）。
----2018年12月6日。
听说我爸爸一直很气愤我为什么只肯按照我父亲的居民户籍所在地的当地标准给与一份等同于我父亲在中国科学院的退休金作为他的零花钱，他如果在中国生活，我还宣称因为中国科学院已经支付了我就不给了。要知道，我父亲一分钱都没拿到，我爷爷们包括他父亲都是把钱直接给我了。据说我父亲走到哪，都是为此安排而红着眼睛一脸强忍的心酸。他的这份委屈还被广而告之以说明我方敏是如何的不肖。
我的解释：其实很简单，因为这一安排，我父亲走到哪，所有需要按照我所要求的标准支付我父亲这一份生活费用的人就统统都知道了，我父亲从来不是一个已经退休的无用无为老人，他是一个被女儿尊敬着的老夫子，中国国家科学院退了休的天文学家。我的这个解释就在2004年7月1日的会议记录里，也赢得了当时在场所有相关人员的100%真心支持。
----2018年12月6日。
听说了一些亲戚对我只照顾我自己父母感觉很心寒。
我的解释：现在你们听说了苏家隆王博真一家在领养他们自己的孩子后与我们家的矛盾，你们就不难想象我已经是训练有素了：没兴趣抢夺你们对你们自己孩子的爱。我有我自己的父母，我只会表达我作为一个亲戚珍惜你们对我的亲戚情，不会混淆我只是一个亲戚立场，也不会混淆血缘关系和亲戚情分的巨大区别。苏家隆2000年去世时，我还为失去他难受，2006年我母亲”去世“之后他们家对我母亲去世的态度，让我从那时起对他们家的任何事情都是不会在乎了。
你们听听：苏家隆王博真是1982年左右领养的王淑秋，我从1982-1983年起就一年只去他们家几次，到现在他们家亲戚甚至是朋友（周洪良一家）都还在四处号称我想抢他们家的东西。我也听说了他们家自1965-1966年就一直和上海我爷爷以前的一个丁姓私人助理一家保持有联络。
----2018年12月6日。
12-05-2018 I graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a BS degree, both were never revoked (我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效)
Heard about this morning's broadcasting about education and anger why I am even eligible to apply graduate study. 听说了今天早上所播出的有关教育及有关我凭什么可以申请研究生院的愤怒？
The anger is because it was announced already Min Fang was not college graduated with a diploma. (听说了有关我根本不是什么本科毕业的愤怒。)
Min Fang's response: This is an untrue statement. (方敏的回应：这根本是错误言论。)
I, Min Fang, graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a Bachelor of Science degree, both were never revoked, this is already confirmed by Shanghai Medical University (AKA Fudan University Shanghai Medical College) in the same radio program's broadcasting on Dec. 1st of 2018.
我方敏是上海医科大学（现名复旦大学上海医学院）毕业的本科生，我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效，听说复旦大学已经在2018年12月1日出面证实这是事实。
----Dec 5th, 2018
How can the public in China have this anger? （为什么中国人民会对此有如此愤怒？）
Min Fang's response: It may not be intentionally caused by a radio program's episode regarding how I write my college graduation's final project. It was intentionally rumored that my college diploma was even revoked because of that public broadcasting. (方敏的回应：是因为广播剧制作的2007年7月的一集播出内容，节目制作可能不是有意但播出的效果似乎是在说我大学毕业论文是抄袭。播出后有一些恶意的谣言甚至说我的毕业文凭和学士证书都因为广播剧的公开事件而取消了。）
That 2007 Medical College's graduation project episode is a most hilarious episode to college professors and research personnel who are familiar with scholar paper writing, all the comments and materials were organized and presented so very funny to scholar-paper-writing community insiders, but somehow not understandable at all to the generic public, which caused the widespread rumor that my college diploma was revoked because of being a copycat in the graduation project papers.（那个2007年播出的有关我上海医科大学毕业论文的一集对所有大学老师及研究生或研究人员等等所有熟悉研究论文研究报告写作的人来说都是能够让他们笑得半死的一集，所有的评论及播出材料的编辑剪辑都是以所有写学术论文的这群人的“圈内人的笑话”所呈现，但好像没被社会大众所听懂，所以造成流言四起，甚至说是我的大学毕业文凭也因为抄袭被公开而因此取消。）
Let me try to explain a bit. My joke was all about how an undergraduate student doesn't know the reason for citing and how to cite.（我来试着解释解释。我当时的笑话就是有关一个本科生如何就是不明白为什么毕业论文需要有文献索引。）
First, let's see the definition for a citation(文献索引的定义）:
"A citation is a reference to a published or unpublished source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of discussion at the spot where the citation appears."(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation)（文献索引是指在自己的学术文章中采用引述他人部分原文或者引用他人学术观点方式引用他人已发表或未发表的作品，并在自己学术文章后面附上他人文献名录的一种方式，目的是为了认可别人学术观点及文章对自己所探讨观点的贡献。）
Second, let's see the definition for a copycat: (抄袭的定义）
"someone who has few ideas of their own and does or says exactly the same as someone else:"
(https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/copycat) （抄袭的定义是指没有自己观点而是使用或模仿他人观点当作自己观点署名。）
Third: Let's see the standard requirements for a scholar paper: （对于学术文章的写作要求通则)
In the U.S, a typical scholar paper requirement for a graduate student:（美国对一个研究生的典型写作要求：）
1: Briefly summarize the philosophy..（简述原理。。）
2: Outline how this philosophy supports the values articulated by....（简述原理对你所探讨观点的适用性。。）
3: What challenges do you expect...in maintaining this philosophy?（原理是否有使用局限？）
4: What would you suggest....?（你的观点？）
Support your statements with evidence from the required studies and your research. Cite and reference your sources in APA style.（请参考本课教学内容及你自己的研究来阐述，请用APA规范来引述及引用。）
中文：
一、本科生毕业论文主要内容（所列出的是对于索引的全部要求）:(typical requirements for undergraduate graduation project paper regarding references and citing，listed is all that related citing):
...
6. 参考文献。期刊内容包括：作者 题名，刊名，年，卷(期)：起始页码-结束页码。著作内容包括：作者、编者，文献题名，出版社，出版年份，起止页码。（standard formatting for reference:...)
....
三、毕业论文份量要求：毕业论文字数一般不少于1.5万字或相当信息量。外文文献阅读量的具体要求，由指导教师量化。(The size of the paper: less than 15,000 words, referencing requirement is per professor. )
(http://me.fudan.edu.cn/instruct/bachelor/lwsxgf.htm)
Let's see the undergraduate student's confusion regarding referencing and citing for the graduation project paper（看一下对于索引和引述引用的困扰）:
Well, the question is why need all these references? Only the article list with author's name or what else? Why I need to cite and how much I can cite in my papers? How long that list would be needed to write my graduation final project paper? （有关的疑问：需要这些文献索引干嘛？就是一个索引名录有每个作者及文献名字就可以吗？我要引述些什么呀？我可以原文引述多少个字还是多少段字？我这个毕业论文的引用文献目录需要多长才可以？
.....
That episode was all about jokes regarding all these confusions as an undergraduate student did not why citing is needed. It never implying me being a copycat.（那一集就是关于一个本科毕业生撰写毕业论文时对文献索引的所有这些不明白而造成的笑话。从来不是影射我抄袭）
12-01-2018 What is citing (什么是引经论典）
I, Min Fang, graduated from Shanghai Medical University with a diploma and a Bachelor of Science degree, both were never revoked.
我方敏是上海医科大学（现复旦大学上海医学院）毕业的本科生，我方敏的上海医科大学本科毕业证书和学士学位证书一直有效，
----Dec 5th, 2018
12-04-2018 I am the proven investor already 以及有关我妈妈的说法
I am still tolerated to be the French Financier of the British East India company, the one with the troops.
Supporting Evidence:
1: My inheriting experience on June 30th of 2004 has been real and lawful.
2: I am provided for already by this British East India Company's French Financier's American company according to July 1st of 2004's decision.
3: Even though the Trust-Registry is not open to the public, there are no academic level judicial arguments if the providing-payment from this American company is lawful, which is the reason the providing-payment is proven already my lawful money.
4: Even though the Trust-Registry is not open to the public, there are no academic level judicial arguments if I am eligible to pay investor-tax for the providing-payment from this American company, which is the reason I am the proven already investor of this American company.
BIG BIG THANKS to all my attorneys.
----Dec 4th, 2018
Heard about this morning's broadcasting.
Heard this morning's if husbandas-in-laws is appropriate were OKed by both husbands.
My gosh: No wonder both sisters have the fantasy that I would so stuck on to want to be their friend no matter how harmful they pose themselves to me, it is because they are so wanted by each other's husband.
Question 1: How this related to me when none of their husbands got anything to do with me?
They were the family on the radio almost a year ago who did their own family chat-discussion with their birth parents if I could possibly have a child or children, which they illusioned so successfully completely ruled out any opportunity if I dare to have biological children of my own. Today, it is their try to rule me out if I dare to claim to have money. All because it is such a harmony family to have husbandas-in-laws for both sisters.
Question 2: How this related to me when none of their husbands got anything to do with me?
So, I say this type of their own harmony is not what I value for what a friend means to me,
Too bad,
So, I say here that disliking is obviously mutual.
----Dec 4th, 2018
Heard some sayings about my mother（中文附后）.
Saying 1: My mother never wanted me, I am how she got stuck with my father.
My answer:
Why would that be a problem to me when I knew for certain I am her most wanted after birth?
Why would that be a problem to my father when all he had tried were to lure her in?
Saying 2: She refuses to share my father with me, my father should be all hers 100%.
My answer:
Why would that be a problem to me after I already learned from my growing-up that she is the reason I can demand my father.
Why would that be a problem to my father after all these years self-proving to everybody so?
Saying 3: My mother has to stay away from me because she knows I may not respect what she has promised.
My answer:
Why would that be a problem to me after I already knew that is who my mother is, I will take care of the matter.
Why would that be a problem to my father after he has been dealing with this sort of all his life?
A note:
My mother has been an easy-promising person, I can certainly imagine how she values those who helped her in our difficult times. I value those who truly helped her as well.
----Dec 4th, 2018
听到了一些有关我妈妈的说法：
说法1：我妈妈坦诚她从来就没想要过我是真实，我只是她被我爸爸彻底缠上了的原因。
我已经很确定我一生下来就成了我妈妈最想要的一个，我哪里会介意我妈妈的坦诚？
我爸爸所做的一切努力就是要永远缠着我妈妈，我爸爸哪里会介意我妈妈的坦诚？
说法2：我妈妈表态不愿意和我分享我爸爸，我爸爸应该100%只属于我妈妈一个人。
成长过程，我已经学到了我妈妈才是我可以向我爸爸做要求的原因，我哪里会介意我妈妈的表态？
结婚以后，我爸爸所做的一切就是在向所有人证明一直就是如此，我爸爸哪里会介意我妈妈的表态？
说法3： 我妈妈没法见我，就因她很清楚我可能很不喜欢她到处许愿的性格。
从小到大，我妈妈一直就是如此确实烦人，我哪里会介意也就是好好处理了。
相濡以沫，我爸爸每天就是直面今天又答应了什么，我爸爸哪里还会介意也就是经验充沛了。
小小便签：
我妈妈一直是个很喜欢答应的人，我也能够想象她是如何珍惜那些在我们家身处困境时帮助过她的人，我也很珍惜那些真正帮助过她的人。我爸爸也是一定如此。
----Dec 4th, 2018
