关于广播剧 （十二- A）
Chinese version
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站，你要么在东北大学里，要么不知该往哪走，要么你走走就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
我的电邮地址：SomebodyInMA@gmail.com, somebodyInBoston@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
03-22-2019 我的2004年苏州建议和江苏省的2001年苏州规划
前序：
很明显，和江苏的矛盾，也就是需要撇清一下，究竟对苏州发展的贡献是什么？是谁的贡献？没什么特别的。
我是在外自己创业自己立业的，和南京同父同母的区别就是这点。也就是俗称的，什么是真的有本事。我和南京同父同母的最大矛盾就是我父母在南京的遭遇。南京那边最骄傲的本事就是不声不响就能把爸爸妈妈的东西全部抢到手，非常骄傲，估计如果他们再能把我的智慧专利想办法偷点，他们更是觉得他们自己很了不起。我是打心眼里瞧不起所有那些帮着他们如此”能干“就为帮助他们可以独自倾吞我父母毕生积蓄而特意向我隐瞒我父亲消息，完全无视我八十多岁老父亲2013年当时凄凉处境的那群南京师范大学附属中学及南京第四中学毕业的所谓“能人”。我和中国政府一些人的矛盾也是类似。
自信拥有一身的本事，是否白手就应该可以创业，就应该可以施展身手；还是必须有现成的大企业大办公室，才能证明拥有经营企业的才华，这一直是很多人的纠结。在很多优秀的企事业管理人才中，很多也会从大学毕业一开始就选择在大公司学习经营管理，而不是自己辛苦创业。其实，这就像电脑行业里选择做个网络管理员或者软件程序员一样，各有各的爱好，我认为也应该都是，”如果环境真的没有可能选择，两者应该都能做的情况“才是真的有本事。
我和美国这边的有钱人老婆的矛盾，也是类似。不过，这不是我一个人和某一个特定富家老婆的矛盾，而是富家女儿和富家媳妇普遍的矛盾。富家女儿从小的家教就是尊重企业的经营管理是一项特殊技能，富家媳妇认为她们自己能嫁入豪门就已经证明了才华出众，不可能不懂经营，作为投资人家里的媳妇，企业必须尊重她们的出众才华，企业必须被她们指手画脚。美国这边的企业，包括广播剧广播公司，被几个富家媳妇搅的是天翻地覆。我是因为自己的亲身遭遇公开痛骂中国政府根本就是娼妓婊子院。
（富家子女和富家伴侣的区别，就是富家子女都有需要证明自己能力的压力，而富家伴侣通常认为豪门婚姻就已经证明了自己的实力。----2019年3月24日）
----2019年3月22日的一篇博文，2019年3月23日改写。
我的2004年苏州建议和江苏省的2001年苏州规划
南京方面其他的矛盾，其实是和江苏的矛盾，也就是苏州能够享受中央政府的类似深圳政策，是否和我有关。
符合参与智慧专利评估资格的三个基本要素一般是1）机构单位有收到某人的智慧创意，2）机构单位认为该智慧创意会对该机构单位有贡献，3）该机构单位因为采用了该智慧创意而获益。在该智慧创意是对该机构单位的获益有贡献的情况下，智慧专利评估的初审就是界定什么是该人自己独立的贡献，什么是他人已经独立做出的贡献。---摘自 2019年3月22日一篇博文
我是在2004年6月的一个星期天去上医大同班的黄莉家里时，谈到我对苏州的欣赏的，就是我做奥运会创意的同一天。
我因为在上海待过五年，听到的都是上海人要定制衣服做点东西，就去苏州；要住，就去嘉兴。苏州做出来的东西拿出来就是满意，退休了能住在嘉兴就蛮好的。我在小说报纸杂志上看到的，也都是苏州自上海建埠以后，就一直是上海富人的精致品供货商，这也是苏州的绣娘一直很有名的一个重要原因。我对此的文绉绉的理解就是：苏州加工是能够体现上海设计的精髓的。
还有，上海人不会担心孩子在苏州接受教育是否会影响教育质量，因为自古苏州的私塾就很好；苏州的衣食住行，上海人都觉得挺合口味，苏州虽小，但样样物件都有苏州自己打出的的名号。我对此的文绉绉的理解就是：苏州有自己的文化底蕴，好东西随手可点但都在深巷里藏着，且都是小规模作坊式经营。
所以，那天我提到深圳就是因为中央政府的优惠政策，以密集人力劳动型代客加工为经济发展的驱动力发展起来的，如果中央政府也能给苏州这样的优惠政策，苏州作为上海设计的加工基地，再加上苏州自己的文化底蕴，以这两者作为苏州经济发展的驱动力，苏州一定是可以向深圳一样迅速发展起来的。
所谓的深圳政策，就是政府区划留在江苏，享受中央政府的贷款和税收优惠，也就是地方税收是交给江苏省的，而不像上海那样归省级的上海市自己留用。这样，江苏省政府一定是会支持的。我毕竟是南京长大的人，胳膊肘子弯一弯，要是完全不想到点南京，非得被江苏省的省会城市南京痛骂不可。这也算是捎带上了南京福利。
听说江苏省对我的愤怒，就是苏州发展计划是江苏省2001年就已经提出的，依托苏州的传统代客加工也是在该计划里就提出的，2006-2007年苏州发展计划被中央批准，享受深圳待遇。为何这却被说成是我的贡献？
我也问了一下，如今苏州发展已经是事实了，当年矛盾的真相究竟是什么？我就说我听到的。
我的贡献就是对于苏州传统加工工业的欣赏性理解。做个比喻，就是有个人很会做菜，这是我和江苏省的共识。江苏省认为中央应该大笔拨款，让这个人的做菜才华可以有施展的空间；我方敏认为这人可以自己凭借自己烧菜的才华，自己挣个钵满盆满丰厚的未来，只要能够享受贷款优惠税收优惠，方便企业经营的资金需求，这人就可以大展鹏图。
据说中央政府当年听到的建议是：江苏省的2001年苏州发展计划：没有经济发展的驱动力，只有苏州的城市发展规划和大笔资金的需求；我的2004年苏州建议：不要钱，有经济发展的驱动力，就只要求少交点税钱就可以了。
我还不清楚的是，中国政府是否有收到我对苏州发展的建议。同一天的奥运创意，我是已经通过2008年的北京奥运会很确定中国政府有收到我的奥运创意，90%以上是我那天的创意。
---- 2019年3月22日。
03-16-2019 Prenup was never a desired but a comprised fundamentals for all discussion participants on July 1st of 2004
Heard some confusion about prenup based marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004.
My-side financial status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I: Why I say those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth?
Those payments-instructor American companies have been operating on North America soil for over 400 years, which means these companies have been investing on North America soil since the year of 1600, which was at about the same time when the most famous British East India company (1600) was first established or the famous boat of "May Flower"(1620) time, this was over 200 years before the famous America Staking (Land Run) time (1800-1850). I heard the land price at the Land Rush(1800-1850) time was about a Guinea per acre, never free but affordable was the reason for the era to be referred as Land-Run time, but land-payments paid to the Federal government had caused huge tension between local Indians and the U.S. federal government.
I heard Rockefellers started to invest in North America at Gold Rush time (1800-1850), Ford wealth started from 1900's Ford Motor. ((Heard it was corrected that both names started investing (buying land) in North American after year of 1700. That is still at least a huge one-hundred years’ time in difference. ----March 18th, 2019)
So, I say those payments-instructor American companies have never been owned by any Rockefeller nor by any Ford, and those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth.
----March 15th, 2019
II: A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws
If any of your friends have a concern that those companies I have claimed may have been owned by your friend's family-name, and the anxiety is somehow the company insist on to provide me money as I requested, I personally think the best way for a friend to do is to verify the company's lawful ownership according to the commercial company's registration law, which is similar to the motor vehicle's registration title or the property certificate, then ...
My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.
The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.
What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.
Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).
How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.
----March 16th, 2019
My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,
If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.
----March 17th, 2019
03-15-2019 上海南京方面的愤怒，执法界的闪烁言辞，我的解释和一些道听途说
Why I say those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth?
Those payments-instructor American companies have been operating on North America soil for over 400 years, which means these companies have been investing since 1600 which was at about the same time when the most famous British East India company was first established or the famous boat of "May Flower" time, this was over 200 years before the famous America Staking (Land Run) time. I heard the land price at the Land Rush time was about a Guinea per acre, never free but affordable was the reason for the era to be referred as Land-Run time, but land-payments paid to the Federal government had caused huge tension between local Indians and the U.S. federal government.
I heard Rockefellers started to invest in North America at Gold Rush time (1800-1850), Ford wealth started from 1900's Ford Motor.
So, I say those payments-instructor American companies have never been owned by any Rockefeller nor by any Ford, and those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth.
----March 15th, 2019
南京师范大学附属中学校友及南京第四中学校友的愤怒：
1：凭什么说我是南京师范大学附属中学的骄傲？他们自己才是。
听说了一些就香港2004年汇到美国的五亿美金款项的一些争议。
1：我听说的：香港2004年汇出的五亿目前以丁姓私人助理家人名义扣留在上海，是美国的Peru Lu按照上海法院的判决并无视美国香港方面对此判决的争议而将该款项汇往上海的，Peru Lu是上海丁姓私人助理的亲生父亲的一个五等亲戚的婚姻丈夫孩子父亲。
2：我听说的：上海法院的判决法官是方智仁一女的孩子的中学同班同学。据说上海法院判决这笔款项是根据方智仁1964-1965年的一纸签名：“如果方文海”竟敢”还有钱，每一分钱都必须归丁姓私人助理或其家人所有“。据说这纸1964-1965年的签名信是由当时年仅二十四岁左右的我父亲的弟弟以我爷爷方智仁的名义签署的，而我父亲的弟弟是听我爷爷告知我父亲说给我父亲的钱存在了香港而获悉香港可能有我爷爷给我父亲的钱的。
我方敏对此的回应是：
首先，香港2004年汇出的五亿是由香港的一个信托所支付的，该付款信托从来都是我爷爷方智仁在1948年就已经直接给了我方敏（方文海所生的女掌）的钱，不是我父亲方文海的钱，我的这份回应是依据我所知道的中国人民共和国信托法及欧美国家的信托法对于信托的定义。（索引：中华人民共和国信托法， 欧美有关信托的法律知识， 也可上网查询“property law" 或者”Trusts.”）
其次，我父亲1965年已经年满三十三岁了，是中华人民共和国法律上界定的独立法律行为责任人，如果该1964-1965年的签名信是由我父亲的弟弟所写这个信息属实，那么，依据中华人民共和国的法律，我父亲方文海的弟弟是根本无权以我爷爷方智仁的名义在1964-1965年擅自掠夺我父亲方文海的财产。
----方敏（2019年3月15日）。
为何我不肯在2004当时就送出我自己愿意的这份五亿美金的礼物？
爸爸妈妈：。。。上海方面因为大娘娘的·去世，一直很愤怒，怪我为什么2004年的时候就是不肯给。很简单，当时我是身体很不好，就只有5分钟记忆力，我自己都帮不了我自己，你和妈妈我更帮不了，我自己的身体难以承受环境突变所带来的心理及环境压力，如果我给你们，你们肯定没好果子吃。如果我给他们不给你们，他们是一定会想查出个水落石出，究竟钱是不是就是确定只给我一个人的，我本人当时完全没有记忆力，根本弄不清，又不能保护你们，他们要是又有经济实力，我们三个会是很惨很惨的。所以我坚持一定要等我拿到钱的时候一起给。他们要查是他们的事，我就是不会因为好心想送礼而已就把自己弄到很惨很惨。2015年以后就不是我在拖延了，我也只能是安慰安慰他们，先注意身体，这钱是从2015-2016年就开始有传言在飞来飞去，现在的传说也还是在飞，着急了，也就是自己得高血压，我是从2015年1月就报警了。（摘自我2019年2月16日的一篇博文）
回望过去这些年，事实是：我父母的遭遇已经很吓人了，我想送礼的那几个要么没参与或者参与的很有限。
据说我父母一直很气愤我没有通知他们我继承财产这件事，否则他们对可能的危险会有点防范意识。我本人当时身体不好只有五分钟的记忆是真实，2004年6月30日当天离开律师办公室的时候我就已经完全不记得了，2004年7月1日那天也是。我相信我父母还在，我相信我自己能被保护着，那些保护我的人就会在乎尊重我托付他们照顾保护我父母的意愿。
希望上海南京方面一切安全。
----2019年3月15日。
03-14-2019 医学上的假死状态，山东的王家，爸爸的遭遇
听到华裔社区一些愤怒。他们很气是因为，有关各方都已经证明爸爸妈妈必死无疑了，我为什么还坚持说爸爸妈妈活着。我是我父母的女儿，我在乎的是我父母好不好，所以，听到我的耳朵里，那些传言都是在说不准我父母活；很多人很气是他们有些没听明白，我也只能说如果他们没有那种王博贤，方文海都是死绝了才好的心态，再重新听听这些传言，可能就和我听到的一样了，”如果王博贤是因为医学上的假死状态被送了进去，怎么好像就是铁了心的不准王博贤有任何逃生的机会啊？究竟是谁恨王博贤恨成这样啊？她是没有钱也没有任何可能继承财产的一个？” (----摘自2019年3月13日的一篇博文)
医学上的假死状态：类似众人所熟知的昏迷。在某些心理病理原因的刺激下，人的大脑意识认知区域会出现极度休克状态，造成失去知觉的现象，这是人类的主观神经受到刺激所致，而植物神经的极度休克状态就是医学上的假死状态，也就是没有了可检测的生命指标。
----2019年3月14日。
我的犹豫：很希望尽快和爸爸妈妈团圆，但很担心在谁恨你们如此还没有查清楚的情况下，即使我已经报警，也还是担心暴露你们会威胁你们的安全。我也还是坚持认为你们必须在公众场合出现，因为我常听到的说法，策略是在各个击破及蒙在鼓里解决。钱一定要扣紧。
----2019年3月14日。
爸爸妈妈：我说我听说的，你们自己小心：
山东王家：妈妈王博贤有10个兄弟姊妹，7个是一个模子出来的漂亮，但既不像他们的爸爸，也不像他们的妈妈。据说这是山东王家认为他们这7个是杂种的原因。
我的回答：听说是因为他们像他们的爸爸的妈妈（奶奶），是典型的河南漂亮，不像他们爷爷的山东模样，不像他们妈妈的山东漂亮，也不像他们爸爸王怀迎自己的河南山东混血后的河北长相，所以做爸爸的王怀迎看着他们一直很开心，从不认为他们不是他自己的孩子。
对妈妈的恨：有一部分可能和方智仁爷爷的遗嘱有关。爷爷替我在香港设立的信托遗嘱说的是，钱是给方文海的女掌一个人的。大陆很多人在2004年以后可能听说了，但不明白女掌是什么意思，以为是妻子角色，所以妈妈很惨。
现在已经清楚了，爷爷方智仁遗嘱中所说的女掌是我方敏（爷爷的家族胎记掌纹孙女）。我在国外一直很安全，就因为国外的都很清楚，只有我活着，才会有信托每年所支付的生活费用给付。所以，国外的恶意传言都是，让我得癌，让我没有日子过。
----2019年3月14日。
爸爸的遭遇：1）我一直说我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，爸爸在激愤的时候，也因为他自己的胎记掌纹说他自己是唐太宗李世民的继承人，因为国内的很多各种传言，所以让国内的大众很气愤。2）国内不熟悉什么是信托继承，认定我是偷了爸爸的应继承财产但爸爸并不介意，所以只要爸爸不挡道了，我就没有可能拿到钱了。
我的回答：
1）：我因为是在国外生活，广播剧的国外华人非华人听众很多都是生活在法制国家里，很清楚广播剧的美国制作的法律思维逻辑，普遍很认同我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，所以我在国外一点压力都没有。（看附注，摘自：02-26-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （16）-- 南师大附中，广播剧矛盾，及唐太宗李世民的继承人）
中国国内对方文海作为我爸爸当然也是唐太宗李世民继承人的这个事实的这种愤怒态度，我方敏的回应是：我父亲方文海也是有家族胎记掌纹的，他从未因此而向中国政府要求政治上的认同，也没有要求中国政府及江苏省政府的财政特别拨款作为家庭经济来源，为何民间对于我父亲方文海是否是唐太宗李世民继承人的怀疑及不认同，会对方文海的人生财产安全造成如此威胁，实在难以理解。
2）：法律上的信托继承，是指我是继承了爷爷方智仁直接指定并在1948年就已经直接给了我的钱。所以，我没有偷爸爸的钱，也从来不是爸爸不介意别人偷了他的钱。
----2019年3月14日。
附注：
03-09-2019 Why I was accepted so immediately by the wealthy community in 2004's meetings? （2004年开会时那些有钱人怎么那么轻易的就接纳了我?)
I heard about some confusion regarding my current situation.
1: Exactly, what has been the issue between me and some persons I met.
My answer: The real issue has been who owns the company that paid my living expenses to Boston of Massachusetts. (--updated on March 13th)
Saying from same high school and Chinese communities, the living expenses paid to Boston of Massachusetts are paid by a husband whose most beloved wife not willing to let me receive. These some persons and Chinese communities are helping the wife to ensure I don't ever receive any such money.
Saying from the paying-instructor American company, the living expenses paid to Boston of Massachusetts are paid by the company according to its known lawful investor's instruction, and I am the person qualify to pay investor's income taxes for those payments.
Saying from myself, The paying-instructor American company is a company that my inherited Trust has been investing, I am an investor of the paying-instructor American company.
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? (March 16, 2019)
According to laws, the commercial registration certificate(license) needs to be displayed at the operating facility of the company so that its legal ownership may not be printed on the certificate:
Reference links:
03-03-2019 A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws
----March 9th, 2019
2: Some anger related to why I so comfortably calling people Uncles in 2004.
My answer: I heard the anger about 2004's meeting is regarding why I was so easily take-in by the wealthy community that I was not part of, at least, not as a newly inherited.
I am a beneficiary person of Trusts that my grandfathers set up for me, all set up abroad before China's 1949-liberation. I grew up in China but I had been taken good care of, I grew up with the rich experiences that my frustration can be smoothed even if my parents don't listen to my complaints, but I couldn't identify who are the smoothing group.
That 2004 meetings, on June 30th and July 1st, were the meetings that I felt like I was brought to a parents-alike group's affiliated-company-party that I was known to them even though I don't know anyone and they don't really know my parents, I felt its so very natural to call anyone Uncle or Untie if they are over 10 years older than me and treated me as a young girl, especially when my requests for all those "I want..." were answered with obvious smiles. Now I know most of the participants are from my grandfathers' Trusts related groups, I was introduced to them as the little girl of my grandfathers'.
My achievements in computer-research related are all real, that my in-depth understanding about the matters, in those casual chats with me about investments as the newly inherited, was the reason for those chats stayed as business work-centric discussions instead of drifting to social talks. I think this "listen to me seriously" is the reason-impression that I was fully take-in as a part of.
There are rumors if I am a threat to the United States has been the reason that I deserved to be smashed in order to protect the United States, I have been wondering why so when I am a U.S. citizen and a "self-claimed" investor to a lot of American companies who have being obviously very protective to my own money that I thought I have hard-earned the reputation of not-willing to give out any at all?
----March 9th, 2019
很多的愤怒是关于外国有钱人怎么那么容易就接纳了我，把我当自己人，是因为我喜欢叫叔叔讨好他们吗？其实，我的经历是一个典型的信托受益人的经历，我是我爷爷们替我设立的信托的受益人，信托都是在1949年解放前就已经设在国外的。我是在国内长大，但我从小就知道既使我爸爸妈妈不管，我的投诉是有人管的有人听的，就是不知这些人是谁。2004年6月30日和7月1日这两天，我的感觉是虽然我不认识任何人，但我是在一个类似和我的家长工作相关的一个公司的工作联谊场合，虽然他们也并不认识我的家长，但他们都知道我是谁家孩子，我自己觉得我把一些比我大了十岁以上又把我当小孩子看的人称呼为叔叔阿姨是很自然的，特别是他们都是笑眯眯地听我说我那一堆小女孩的“我想要这个，我想要那个"。现在我知道很多参与会议的都是我爷爷们替我设立的信托的相关人士，我是作为我爷爷们的小孙女介绍给他们的。
同时，我自己在电脑软件研究方面的成就都是真实，作为刚刚继承信托财产的受益人，我对他们礼貌问询对信托投资有何看法的相关谈话内容的充分理解和认知，是这些闲聊成为工作探讨而非社交闲谈的原因。我认为他们”很认真听我说话“是大众觉得我被富裕阶层充分接纳的界定印象。
----2019年3月9日。
爸爸妈妈：
如果方姓人士通过一些方式联络询问，就让他们自己看我的博客，自己找律师解疑释惑，亲兄弟明算账，他们既然认为他们是在捍卫他们自己的合法权益，就让他们自己找法律问讯清楚，比较合适。我没有隐瞒我爸爸还有一子，我爸爸有三个弟妹，也没隐瞒我爷爷有一弟一妹。我所知道的所有相关继承的资讯也都在那个博客上了，从未隐瞒。我是已经将我的博客在2015年就特别通知了南京，2018年也问了上海是否要我博客地址。
全世界各地，懂中文英语的，也都可以看懂我的那个博客，没什么需要特别谈的，他们是一腔愤怒，好像我偷了藏了他们的钱，我也是一腔愤怒，没兴趣看他们的老脸拖着老长，不愿意他们一副上门就是该砸该跺的气势，更不愿意自己家里被他们直接上门打砸抢。
美国政府，美国法律，中国政府，中国法律也都是可以看到我的那个博客，也都已经由我本人在2015年及2018年就特别通知了我父系母系的主要亲属关系。按照法律，没有他们的钱，就是没有。我知道的是我们家的爷爷们每代都有分家产，也就是没有任何一个爷爷欠下了他自己的下种费和亲热费，需要我这个做孙女的代为偿还，所以，也就没有什么只是因为有血缘关系就必须拿我的钱的。这就是在亲兄弟明算账，遗嘱继承是依照爷爷自己的意愿，我拿的是爷爷特别给我一个人的钱。
--------节摘自2019年3月6日文章“亲兄弟明算账”。
03-07-2019 Commercial Property Registration Laws and Political Governing-ship
I heard it has been a huge amusement in Chinese communities when there was an episode about a lady who had a big forehead family birthmark wish to let her family birthmark heir child own the Europe which was her share of the allot.
I was part of this amusement because my family (also) have a big forehead birthmark, I used possibly "also" because I don't know if that episode is about my Trust and there were some other families also have big forehead family birthmarks in that same episode.
Why it is so funny? Well, there are a lot of countries now in Europe. China has been through so many dynasty changes that even commercial ownership of a piece of land in the Republic of China time has not been acknowledged since the New Communism China since 1949, and this episode announced ownership entrusted of the land of entire Europe. I heard there was some guess if that lady is a daughter from Genghis Khan who was the only Chinese Emperor in history that had occupied Europe.
Let me try to explain a little more. Over history, tons of stories about how one group of people fought against another group of people to own a piece of land, this in China sometime brought dynasty change if the fight was big area enough, the fight was all about political governing-ship, but commercial ownership, which means owned by paying the fair property price of the land, normally acknowledged as valid even after dynasty changed, except the communism governing since 1949. Commercial property ownership is governed by property registration laws in almost all countries.
I was such amusement in Chinese community also because I do have lawfully valid entitlements which historically means normally should associate with a piece of land each, well, I say I do have some commercial ownership of some pieces of lands. Yeah!
----March 7th, 2019
Also, there were rumors in Los Angels area's Chinese communities that a Yu-family and a Li (Lee)-family had a big fight that involved several hundred Chinese people in the 1960s, which should mean a Lee's Family Trust company in Hong Kong area should be owned by the winner of such famous fight. I also heard that Lee's Family Trust company, as well as Hong Kong people never heard of such rumor, has caused a lot of agitation from the "winner" group. I say the company's ownership in this rumor is commercial ownership of a commercial company, not the political governing-ship of the Hong Kong geographic area, so this Hong Kong company's ownership has been governed by the commercial registration laws and owned by its lawfully registered owner, not the "winner" group.
----March 7th, 2019
03-06-2019 Three cousins Mr. Lu-s and their three Miss Yu wives (三个台湾人卢先生和他们的三个于小姐妻子）
I heard there is an attorney Mr. Peru Lu, a cousin to the famous Mr. Christopher Lu, is the featured person in the new rumors who can decide how to distribute my intellectual incomes without legal authorization but his own personal thoughts.
I heard his personal thoughts include:
1: Intellectual Incomes are supposedly based upon the evaluations happened in the past, not by my demand. But if the company insist on granting me, he thinks he can grant some amount given-out as well.
My answer: Mr. Lu is not part of the rumored investigation efforts to say that I was not granted intellectual reward by fair evaluation, and what I have been demanding are the intellectual incomes from the past evaluations. I disagree Mr. Lu has the privilege to change any money's lawful ownership by his personal opinions, unless that is lawfully his own money.
2: I don't have any valid inheriting, so he thinks it is absurd for me to demand to provide payment.
My answer: I have valid inheriting experience but what I have inherited have been what I heard of, I can't receive pre-decided living expenses providing from my inherited Trusts have been the reason I contact law enforcement, and I heard all pre-decided payments have been paid out on time as scheduled. I disagree these Mr. Lu-s don't believe if I have factually lawfully valid inheriting can be any excuse for them to encourage spreading hate expression among the Chinese communities to against me being a female living alone, nor to against if I can be capable to have any intellectual contributions that have earned intellectual incomes.
Plus, I heard both Mr. Peru Lu and one of his two cousins have been married to a Shanghai native Miss Yu. And I heard, Mr. Peru Lu's wife is a sister to a wife of an investor to Boston's Chinese Supermarket chain.
----March 6th, 2019
03-03-2019 A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws
Heard there was a recent interview that mentioned if I wrongly claimed someone else's money even though the name has not been spelled on my web blog.
02-28-2019 How could I possibly contribute to Viagra's lab-testing?
Heard about doubts how could I possibly contribute to lab testing? The doubts obviously from the fact I have very bony lousy hands which means no good at all in lab testing.
I heard this doubt is related to some Viagra related lab testing. Well, I have to say the lab testing can occur into my mind may purely because the basic "if... else..." training as a computer programmer. I don't remember if I did contribute but I can try to illustrate if I can.
Since I was mentioning about my understanding of human reproductive function on a June Sunday in 2004, well, of course, "if that thought can be helpful, what else need to be in consideration to ensure this 'application' to be fully successful?" is a computer programmer's thinking-route.
So, as an FDA-equivalent institute's former apprentice member of Health Department organized pharmaceutical industry's yearly Inspection group, and in a coercive tone that I learned from those health department's Inspectors, the thoughts might have been "you are saying this can improve male-sexuality? how effective can you define this improvement? and how stable this effectiveness can be? Is it still 'no one knows if it is the beauty or the wine' effective? And what will be the effectiveness comparison objectives? I need all these."
So, it would be how to define the effectiveness of this improvement, how to define stability (or effective scope), and what should be the test objectives are what I might have been contributed to lab testing.
----Feb, 28th, 2019
I heard I had been a quick learner of the coercive leader style who having this authoritative deep in-tone but easy apprentice appearance in pharmaceutical industry Inspecting related work experience, may be the reason I was criticized heavily by the former colleagues if I can be a person having any academic achievement even after I changed my profession to technology. I heard pharmaceutical industry personnel can easily relate me as one of the health department's Inspectors, but relate some former colleagues, if on Inspecting assignments, to own quality in-house assurance departments.
Also, I got the following test score from my MBA graduating critical thinking test, it seems I need to have the law education to improve, such an LSAT baseline score.
----Feb, 28th, 2019
02-26-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （16）-- 南师大附中，广播剧矛盾，及唐太宗李世民的继承人
Heard the anger that I have cash money with me but refuse to pay what I should and live comfortably.
My answer: I have been helped by laws to have a compromised thrift but not miserable living. I have been in a legal situation that I can't receive my lawful incomes is the reason I don't have a lot of money. Paying bills have been huge spending that can make my life very miserable.
----Feb. 26th, 2019
听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。”
我的回应是：这是误会。
首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。
还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍：
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民和东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人，而很多不熟悉没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。
如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。
----2019年2月26日，2019年2月27日更新。
还有，有关谁才是唐太宗李世民继承人一事，
我的说法：其实，究竟谁是继承人应该是按照唐太宗李世民自己定下或认可的家族继承规则而言，如有变更，也必须是由按照唐太宗李世民自己认可的继承规则而继承的人所更改的才是有效更改。按照唐太宗李世民自己所认可的家族继承规则，我父亲方文海和我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。
我们家在唐朝历史上有一些皇帝不是我方敏的爷爷而是我爷爷的兄弟叔侄等，他们的后裔继承人应该说是他们自己这个皇帝爷爷的继承人，而不应该说他们自己是唐太宗李世明的继承人。他们自己的这个皇帝爷爷其实是他们这一支的起家立户爷爷。
----2019年2月26日
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站，你要么在东北大学里，要么不知该往哪走，要么你走走就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
我的电邮地址：SomebodyInMA@gmail.com, somebodyInBoston@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
About my five announced 400Million payment, ①The third payment is from Rupuk Trust（李璟信托）。Min Rupuk is my birth name, Rupuk became a family name since the 1000 year ago Jewish marriage from Uighur area（新疆维吾尔族地区）. ②The fourth payment is from Mercedes Trust, Min Mercedes is my birth name from a 500 hundred years ago Oldenburg-Mercedes marriage, Min Oldenburg is also my birth name. ③ The fifth payment is from Marcus Trust, Min Marcus is my birth name since the 400 years ago Stuart-Marcus marriage, Min Stuart is also my birth name. (05-22-2021)
Both the authenticness of my biological family and the lawfulness of all my financial incomes have been law investigated with factual truth-based conclusions. Issues with Chinese People and Chinese Community: Some of them are not demanding their fairness of what they should have earned from the LAW, some of them are not demanding their lawful inheriting share from their own biological and lawful marriage family, all these people are just demanding money as the desire of wish to own money, and with a tone that they are doing such a charity to only demand majority of what I lawfully own without taking my entire family's lives with the lawful wealth entirely. I refused their charitable thoughts and action of such granted attitude to threaten my life and my lawful private wealth, I have asked LAW protection, and I truly believe they deserve law bullets in their heads to learn something.
To those academic veterans regarding if fair evaluation on the patent award: If you have received your copy of the evaluation report, you can check: ①how your award is evaluated and if it is a fair number, If my contribution helped you to be awarded, your own number will be discounted to reflect my contribution with your acknowledgment if fair at the evaluation meeting. I got nothing to do with anyone else. ②if your team's number is a fair number in your unit, ③ if your unit has a fair number in your division, and etc. All listed in your copy of the evaluation report. If you have any reasonable doubts about any of these numbers fairness, contact the 1800 number listed in the same copy of the evaluation report. About if I got my share fair? I don't think I got my number unreasonably and I am happy with what I got, but if any doubts are lawfully reasonable, fair evaluation matters is what I believe as well.
----04/29/2021
A lot Hispanics wonder how I can be the only person to claim the ownership of the commercial landlot that my current residernce locates? Answer: Because I am the sole beneficiary of a trust-investor of the landlot's owner company, the trust was set up by my ancient grandfather'Young Rupuk at about AD 1000. He was Southern Tang dunasty Emperor Jing Lee, Rupuk is his Uighur-mother‘s maiden name I inherited. Rupuk trust is my 2016-2017's $400Million living expense provider trust. 这是我博客上经常提到的自1967年7月开始汇款中国的那个美国公司的投资信托，也是我2016年至2017年四亿美金生活费的支付信托。就是位于南京的南唐中主李璟的英文名字，Rupuk是他继承的他维吾尔族妈妈的娘家姓氏，我在2004年继承。
To police officers: I am asking help on anti-harassment regarding remote medical treatement session that constantly being harassed becuase of the doubts if self-paid funding is lawful. It has been very harassive because there is a somebody constantly calling own private police officer friends who is not a local police officer that having the legitimate policing power to inquiry such citizen-obligational doubts on behave of this somebody in the medical provider facility, nor an investigator who has the legitimate investigation power to have some information authentic enough about this doubt, so I am asking all possible helps to help me to have a non-interrupptive medical session.
-- Min Fang (Min Fone, Min Lee), 06/14/2020
To police officers: I am asking help on anti-harassment regarding remote medical treatement session that constantly being harassed becuase of the doubts if self-paid funding is lawful. It has been very harassive because there is a somebody constantly calling own private police officer friends who is not a local police officer that having the legitimate policing power to inquiry such citizen-obligational doubts on behave of this somebody in the medical provider facility, nor an investigator who has the legitimate investigation power to have some information authentic enough about this doubt, so I am asking all possible helps to help me to have a non-interrupptive medical session.
-- Min Fang (Min Fone, Min Lee), 06/14/2020
What "600 years never owned by a name" means? The big American rich names who came to this land as the first generation immigration were cousins from a shared in-100-years grandfather, this means that all current this American rich name's cousins are offspring family inherited from this one grandfather, so that "600 hundred years never owned by a name" means the wealth has been for 600 years never owned by this shared one grandfather of all current big name rich children. --08/24/2020
Article: Confusion about this blog's publishing.
1：The confusion if my 2004's Trust-inheriting can be valid.
2：The confusion about if I published any Rockefellers' money as I claimed.
No, I did not publish any Rockefellers' money as I claimed.
All those companies I claimed have been doubted if this or that name's family wealth, the particular is the "Pejovic" company that I claimed as the third year's providing instruction company. This "Pejovic" company has never been owned by the "Pejovic" family historically has been clarified so that this company is not Rockefeller in-law's family wealth.
All those companies I claimed are not Rockefeller money because
3：The confusion about O'Connor's family name
There has been a lot of anger from O'Connor regarding my mentioning O'Connor names on my web blog. The reason I have to update my blog is to clarify some "why mention?", all the reason has been that I have been confronted fiercely or commented negatively, by O'Connor name's affiliated, regarding my inherited wealth I stated in my blog articles. So, I list my reasons why I agree there shouldn't be any mentioning for both parties:
1) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, that there shouldn't have any reason for any O'Connor affiliated to be confused about me stating my inherited wealth, nor for me to mention O'Connor name, which purely because I am not socially nor professionally associated with O'Connor name at all.
2) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, there should be no reason for me to be agitated regarding O'Connor name's family wealth, and there should be no reason for any O'Connor's name affiliated to be confused with my money and my money spending-ship, purely because O'Connor's family wealth is not associated to my inherited wealth.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
4：The confusion about my money-spending-ship and my any paid-in-full service:
I assume, all police officers and law peoples, at least in the United States, would agree with me that any money lawful ownership confusion can only be resolved by calling the police to do the law investigation, or file a civil lawsuit.
I firmly believe nobody can replace the police on law investigation or enforcing laws,
and I firmly believe nobody can replace the Judicial court on clarifying the money lawful ownership's legal confusion.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
Article: The confusion if I am an heir to ancient Chinese Emperors
I am the anointed and biological heir to my ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor 李世民：
My promised French name for my "French Financier" newspaper entitlement:
Related confusion and explanation:
To all who are concerning:
Between 1850-1903, there were two sets of multi-ship groups sending out some treasures from China, I heard all experienced tragedies with theoretically no survival, and I heard some such sunk-ships have been discovered and have research papers published as well. Also, the ship-discovering organization is a Corporate which means it is a non-public stock company., Please verify this information.
1850年-1903年，有两批由多艘船只组成的船队装载财宝由中国通过海运送往外国。我听说，这是很多人在查找的钱财，我赶紧告知我听说的：所有这些船只都遭遇了海难事故，相关的沉船也已经陆续被发现了，也已有了相关的研究论文发表过。也听说了发现沉船的机构是一家非上市股票公司(所发行的股票没有上市交易的股票公司）。请查询这批财宝的人员查实此信息。
----2019年8月3日
My great-grandmother born in 1892 or so in Shanghai of China, her maiden Jurchen Duke family had lived in Shanghai area before 1541. My great-grandfather was (possibly) mothered by a royal daughter of Qing dynasty Emperor Hong Taiji （皇太极) and no other further roral marriage till his own marriage with my great-grandmother in 1911 or so.
我的曾祖母是1892年左右在中国上海出生的，她娘家在1541年之前就已经是是女真贝勒（公爵），也在1541年之前就已经居住在上海地区了。 我曾祖父的祖奶奶可能是清朝皇帝皇太极（1592-1643)的 一个女儿，之后我家就没有和任何清朝皇室后裔联姻，直至我曾祖父于1911年左右和我曾祖母结婚。
----2019年8月3日
My promised French name for my "French Financier" newspaper entitlement:
My British Name：Naryshn Wohnmor。 ( 发音：Narsh Womo)。
In Mangolian（蒙古语）：
Naran (Sun，太阳) =》Nar；
Hin (Young，年轻）=》hn；
My grandmother's possible first name "Yuush（雅悠诗）" =》ysh；
My Mongolian grandmother is rumored to have given an entitlement family name by her maiden father Kublai Khan: "Ohnmar (Womo），（汉音译：“乌玛（乌莫）”）=》Wohnmar。
The meaning of my British name Naryshn Wohnmor: Young rising sun Yuush Ohnmar (Womo).
我的英国名字的意思是“年轻初阳时候的雅悠诗·乌玛”）
----2019年8月26日。
Article: Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion
Note:
If anyone curious about what exactly this article means, this someone's curiosity can be helped by asking an own friend in the attorney profession to help out the reading. It truly means my any money is irrelevant with any Rockefeller's any wealth, legally, financially and materially (April 8th, 2019). This is a lengthy article, but please ask your own friend in the attorney profession to read it entirely (April 25th, 2019).
Widely shared negativizes about me is how I dis-appreciated the gentlemen from 2003's Hyatt Regional Hotel's reception lobby, especially after I got the deal of the radio program that helped me to be handsomely financially independent (June 21st, 2019). Actually, it is not appropriate to imply so after the broadcasting of the story featuring his friend's presence upon his wife's request on that very next day at the bar of the same Hyatt Regional. Also, the radio program deal was my successful hard-sale which was 100 % totally, completely and factually based on a very shrewd market segment analysis of the radio industry(June 21st, 2019). and the true reason how I got that radio program can only be best described as similar to the famous IKEA model from Harvard Business Case. It landed my radio program a leading National broadcasting channel, a best broadcasting window and a rebroadcasting window, unlimited free & full access to a fully equipped recording studio, a ready producing team, a ready promotion team, and ready supporting resources fully provided free by the Radio company. All in July 1st of 2004's meeting-record. (June 22nd, 2019).
Reference of chronicle complaints about Rockefeller(s): Chronicles updates of events
Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion
It seems that the big name R has a shared family habit to announce their own speculation as if an authoritative statement is THE reason for a lot of my troubles. I heard they "have been announcing" that I don't have inheritance since 2005, which has been almost the exact same way they have been kept announcing on the radio since 2014, as you heard from, all those official public statements from the big authority R houses about everybody else's all private matters, the only difference is those since-2005-announcements are not addressed to the public audience so that my inheriting related knowing-groups never even heard of it. This is the reason for why I have been complaining that it seems nobody needs to listen to my anybody's saying regarding if I have inherited my birth grandfathers' money no matter how credible this my anybody might be, which insulted a lot of people who have tried to explain the confusion as well as kept me screaming this entire time.
I say it aloud again: My inheriting has my own inheritable and own inheriting administrative attorneys that absolutely & completely independent from any R's family wealth. My Trust-inheriting is irrelevant to any R's wealth.
Reference of chronicle complaints about Rockefeller(s): Chronicles updates of events
----April 5th, 2019
Heard 2007's three meetings have been reasons for a lot of confusions. I heard there were three meetings in 2007 (January, June, and July respectively) intended to address some confusion regarding 2004's three meetings but resulted in broadcasting original confusion only.
June of 2007's meeting, I heard it was all about confusion if my 2004's inhering can be valid:
1: How can an inheriting without any identification verification?
Article: Complaints about Rockefellers
03-31-2019's next day: Three meetings in 2007 to address but result in broadcasting original confusion about three meetings in 2004
All these companies have never been owned by Rockefeller holdings, nor any individual Rockefeller, nor any individual Rockefeller's any marriage partner(s). ----August 12th, 2019
A tip: How to verify whose money or who is the investor? One simple way is to verify from "stock certificate number" or the ownership registration record, which is the evidence of lawful investor-ship and lawful ownership of the linked dividend-profit, another way is to verify the signature from a holder of such certificate.
Rockefellers' insist-on claiming ownership of any U.S. money that I am expecting but without presenting such valid certificate nor such valid signature from holder family senior of such certificate has been my huge complaints.
----July 29th, 2019
Note:
If anyone curious about what exactly this article means, this someone's curiosity can be helped by asking an own friend in the attorney profession to help out the reading. It truly means my any money is irrelevant with any Rockefeller's any wealth, legally, financially and materially (April 8th, 2019). This is a lengthy article, but please ask your own friend in the attorney profession to read it entirely (April 25th, 2019).
Chronicle updates:
国内一些误解是关于我们一家是否“家传痴傻”，可能是出于丁姓私人助理一家的亲生经历。他们对我们家的立场似乎是见钱就拿见，见东西就搬，把我爷爷奶奶家都搬空了，一家三个孩子两个大人都是很不在乎还继续欢迎他们一家上门做客，把我爷爷去世时留下的一共六万余元银行存款拿了一半左右，而三个孩子都还是他们一家很好的朋友。我方敏对此的说明：我曾祖父的突然去世对当时很年轻的我爷爷影响很大，所以，包括我父亲在内的四个孩子，都是在7岁生日那天就已经拿到了我爷爷所给予所分配的家产（家里传统：女孩70多万，男孩一百五十万）。在物价便宜的1950年前后，四个孩子每人每年1%的利息就是七千元或上万元，超越我爷爷奶奶留给他们自己的每年生活费用及家里的全部家当，这才是当时在上海生活的三个孩子及我的爷爷奶奶毫不在意的主要原因。另一个原因可能是：丁姓私人助理是和我爷爷奶奶同岁的，而丁家太太是我爷爷一个同龄社交女友的唯一孩子。----2019年7月20日。
I was blamed for picking up on O'Connor name to have my own-wealth fight. This has been a misunderstanding. I misunderstood my Trust-inheriting as three companies inheriting was the reason for such confusion. The situation in 2016 was: I was aware one of such companies did send out $500Million as I requested in 2004 but somehow I could not receive it, and I was relentlessly trying to contact another such company's accounting representative to inquire my inheriting. So, it is most appropriate to say that I was triggered to have anxiety over the O'Connor name by if they invested confusion during the period of time when I can't get an answer for my inheriting-inquiry. ----July 20th, 2019
中国的文革期间，“当街杀人，随后抄家”，是被作为过国家英雄奖励的；现在的中国政府国家宣传似乎也是，“如果能够为钱杀人，是在响应中国政府号召，是在全世界范围内实现中国的共产主义，是应该被中国政府当作国家英雄的。”我方敏本人再加上一条投诉，为何中国政府的宣传是表达“在私人住宅的私用厕所里安装摄像机镜头并通过卫星播放女人在自家厕所洗澡画面，是应该被认为是中国共产主义行为的实现”？----2019年7月8日。
Widely shared negativeness about me in the entertainment industry is how I disappreciated the gentlemen from 2003's Hyatt Regional Hotel's reception lobby, especially after I got the deal of the radio program that helped me to be handsomely financially independent. It was well known that so many entertainment industry's personnel had turned-off on me after only $7Million in total for the radio program's possible investment was announced. I have to say I truly appreciate Mr. Hyatt's gentleman's kindness, and I am sorry that I failed such public expectation in expressing my appreciation. The different understanding between me and the entertainment industry was caused by what happened after that only $7Million in total possible investment was announced. That radio program deal was my successful hard-sale which was 100 % totally, completely and factually based on a very shrewd market segment analysis of the radio industry. This radio program deal was the deal made me the famous "a salesperson" entitlement inside the salesperson profession. All these were in the original meeting record of July 1st of 2004, all have been acknowledged by the radio company, and all have been protected by the United States laws. ----June 21st, 2019
以我2004年7月1日以成功的大规模创造投资就业机会而成名之前的生活经历，及我对生活中很多事物的想法和感悟为主线，介绍我得以成功的原因，基础和机遇，并扩充基本知识和背景常识的介绍，同时兼顾趣味性，生活感和故事性。Radio program's hypothesis: Based on the huge success of how I can massively create investment and employment opportunities on June 30th and July 1st of 2004, based on my life experiences before July 1st of 2004 as well as my understanding and thoughts about everything or anything in my life, to introduce what it takes to succeed, to introduce possible reasons, backgrounds and opportunities of my each successful creation of some investment and employment opportunities, to introduce related background information and background specialty knowledge that is useful in everyone;s daily life and helpful for succeeders to recognize and catch THE opportunity, etc,, with good story-telling, fun materials, and reality practicality.
----2019年6月11日, from https://somebodyinma.blogspot.com/
A Mr. David Rockefeller from the 2003 Hyatt Regional, not the bar person from the same the 2003 Hyatt Regional, needs to realize the bar person is at least a day possible to confuse anyone about if forgot Rockefellers' family education of "No Fucking, No money" so famously published already. So I say to this Mr. David Rockefeller of the 2003 Hyatt Regional, please stop confusing anyone if my money can be possibly associate with your sexuality after your marriage family's friendly bar person's story had been so loudly broadcasted. ----June 12th, 2019
It is very annoying when family-seniors don't educate youngers enough about how to know what is the family wealth. The good example of "so annoying" is Rockefellers' younger generation insisting on stating I dared to claim those five companies in this blog article has to mean the intention of taking over their family wealth, which can be proved to be so absurd because all these companies never paid ESTATE TAX for any of their seniors.-Some said my tone is very annoying as well, as if I am not their own generation but their uncles', I say why would it matter at all after all those "no association" announcements, but I can imagine my parents finally can breathe some easiness about educatable.---June 9th, 2019.
Heard the best way to know what is going on is to check out any edition of any author's <Trust law Textbook> from any law school for chapters on beneficiary's possible situation and how Trust laws have been evolved in order to protect effectively, which are the explanation of what has been going on word-by-word. 想了解什么是信托及信托法，最好的办法就是读一读法学院的《信托法教材》，想知道我的故事究竟是怎么回事，就读一读《信托法教材》里的有关“受益人的可能处境及原因分析”和信托法是如何演变的历史。据说我和我父母的经历就是《信托法教材》里每字每句的描述及说明为何《信托法》必须如此这般制定才可以有效保护。----May 28th, 2019
华裔社区这种负面言论比较多，一个原因是因为我所有的那些由奖励公司已经发放的智慧专利都没有收到过（其中绝大部分安全，但有一些已被提领了超过10年），另一个可能原因就是这些专利收入被一些人提领了之后所故意制造的负面言论以企图将我的领款者身份彻底换掉的（智慧专利一般是分期五十年付款的）。目前，我认为我所面临的负面情绪负面言论主要来自三大块：1：那些过去十多年已经提领了我的智慧专利收入的一些人；2：当年（1967年7月至1996年10月)拿到每月一万美金中的一部分的一些人；3：想要提领我的信托所支付给我和我父母三人的生活费用的一些人。----原稿于2019年5月21日，5月24日修改。
中国自己制定的继承法就是中国文化中国传统里面有关继承的道理，中国人民台湾人民依据中国传统地方特色与时俱进所制定的中国法律台湾法律就是依据中国文化传统的中国道理，信托继承在台湾在中国大陆在欧洲在亚洲，都和我在美国的信托继承是一样的法律。----May 12th, 2019
抗争法律权益？发动群众运动？改变社会制度？ ---- May 10th, 2019
“只有没有现钱在手上，就不能说是谋财害命”的说法：
我方敏是从未参军且1996年离开中国后就一直居住国外的，我父亲方文海1956年就已经被中国的军事法庭裁决为开除军籍后就离开了中国人民解放军，谁是中国人民解放军的现役军人属于中国军法管辖范围？我方敏现在公开表态不愿意我本人被中国政府通过军事协作而谋杀，不愿意我父母方文海王博贤被谋杀，并且愿意看着司法执法机关可以公平的捍卫受害人利益。我方敏公开指控中国国家主席国家军委主席习近平篡党夺权，完全无视中国人民解放军是由中国宪法所规定的中国共产党领导下的军队，将中国人民解放军作为其私人武装力量，滥用职权协助卖淫，抢劫和谋财害命等中国法律所界定的刑事犯罪行为。（参阅：03-24-2019 南京方面的矛盾（22）---- 被开除军籍的处罚？我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强 ）
----2019年5月8日。
有关预留分继承(legitimate, legitimate portion)：
05-03-2019 (I) “至少应该有这么多“说法的起源
05-03-2019 (II) 究竟什么是预留分继承？
----May 4th, 2019
My 2004 inheriting was Trust-Inheriting which does not have any legitime portion (legitima portio).
爷爷为我设立信托是1948年以中华民国公民的身份在英国租界地的香港设立的，爷爷是在1965年才以中华人民共和国公民身份在上海去世的，我本人是2004年以中华人民共和国公民身份在美国继承该信托，我爷爷子女在1965年已经分家产继承了我爷爷方智仁的遗产，我爷爷子女的1965年分家产遗产继承及我本人2004年的信托继承都不涉及台湾的继承法。(04-29-2019 信托继承是没有预留分的，即使按照台湾法律，信托继承都是遗嘱完全有效的继承。）
----April 29th, 2019
Please don't be overly concerned if you heard the President of the U.S, U.S. Foreign Department, and U.S. Treasury Department have all announced negatively about if I could possibly have any money to be called lawfully private wealth. It may be just some confusion caused by arguments of "What exactly is the difference between the legal and other administrative components of a government?" to be announced as strong evidence of NO MONEY.
What about the Chinese government's announcement of "China doesn't need your type of talent"? I agree to the saying that it is hard to know unless it can be cleared from the U.S. about what is my type of talent that was told to China.
----April 28nd, 2019
If you heard confusing announcements about money matters as well as ridiculous romance matters, please read this article with the help provided by your friend who is in the attorney profession, and to address your confusion regarding such announcements to this attorney friend of yours.
Example: confusion caused by arguments of "what exactly is the definition of an investor" or "what exactly can be covered by a medical insurance plan" to be announced as strong evidence of NO MONEY.
----April 22nd, 2019
信托投资是通过财务经理所管理的投资组合，自己拿钱出来投资办厂开公司是属于自己直接管理的投资。洛克菲勒家族是带着钱从奥地利或者德国来美国投资的，洛克菲勒家族是因为投资Standard Oil 石油公司发了家，福特家族是从英国或者爱尔兰带着钱来美国的，福特家族是因为投资福特汽车公司发了家。如果“1941年的四十万美金”传言中的方智祥他们家当时带了这笔四十万美金来美国投资，就属于是这种情况了，也就是看他们当时投资的公司有没有发财了。我在美国的投资都是通过我所继承的信托进行投资和投资组合的，不是我自己直接带着钱来美国然后自己直接拿钱出来投资的，而他们都是自己带钱来美国自己直接进行投资的，所以，我一直说我所继承的钱及我的信托在美国的投资，与洛克菲勒家的钱以及福特家族的钱是完全不搭界的也没有任何关系的。----2019年4月21日
In 2017-2019, I have complained to the law enforcing agencies that Rockefeller name has sexually harassed me through the public channel media and through glasshouse cancer treatment-related medical facilities, I have complained to the law enforcing agencies that Rockefeller name has taken my radio company's major featured person fee of $3Billion - $4Billion entirely (avg $26Million - $35Million per month for 10 years). ----April 17th, 2019
The company's ownership confusion can be illustrated as: The Federal Commerce Department has instructed the Commerce Department Boston office to write payment-check for my living expenses because I am a Bostonian who has inherited a Trust that has some business dealing with the Federal Commerce Department, the ownership confused families thought they have owned the Commerce Department Boston office already and entirely because of their generationally close work relationship, while the Commerce Department Boston office speak-person kept explaining the paying-instruction was from the federal but the entire commerce department is not the payer of my living expenses. This is the same reason that my Trust's entrusting attorneys were very quiet when I was vertically multiplying objected by the entire Commerce Department Office line for the ridiculousness of my eligibility to inherit the Commerce Department Boston office on July 1st of 2004. And it is the same reason that the ownership of the Commerce Department Boston office can't be "picked up" by just writing it on any inheriting list, even if that inheriting list is affiliated to the famous rich Rockefellers. ----April 16th, 2019
I also heard a Rockefeller has illegally "announced" on the radio their own desire to spend my money on the radio in 2007's broadcasting. ----April 13th, 2019
可能也和2007年三次会议有关的 “04-12-2019 恐怖啊，以逼婚实施勒索的尝试”。----April 12th, 2019
Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies are listed at the bottom of this article. ----April 11th, 2019
I heard my big trouble with Rockefeller name started since July 1st of 2004 but not because of my huge several billion U.S. dollars inheriting-day spending. I heard it was because a Rockefeller's name affiliated somebody has "inherited" that publicly famous "O'Connor's confusion company" almost immediately after O'Connors, as well as that American company's six upstream investor-companies, objected "my inheriting" in ceremonially monotonous style. I heard the reason for Rockefeller's-affiliated "inheriting" is "it is just a picking up" but Rockefellers' insisting on to validate such ownership, according to a forged inheriting-list, have made it not funny at all.
*This American company has a famous "French Financier" investor-company. (updated on April 14th)
*This American company's current size is about $400Billion. (updated on 04/16/2019).
*I have complained to the law enforcing agency demanding clarification about O'Connor's confusion, and I heard O'Connor name did the same, I have changed my inherited-it-saying after I heard the clarification that this American company has been lawfully owned fully by its British Investor company for over 400 years. (updated on 04/17/2019).
I heard another big trouble with Rockefeller name was a 2007's radio broadcasting which announced my first year's American paying company is a "Rockefeller's taking over". This is the company has the rumored my birth children's inheritable story but such story never has rumored any child "supposedly" from the announced "taking-over" Rockefeller. I heard this taking-over announcement has some foreign department's stubborn associations is the reason for all those headaches to everyone who has not heard such a 2007's announcement.
*This American company has a Portugal investor company. (updated on April 14th)
*This American company's current size is about $400Billion as well. (updated on 04/16/2019).
I heard two other big troubles with Rockefeller name were both because of their in-law affiliation. One is my third year's paying American company, one is my fourth year's paying American company, which have added rumored Rockefellers' "taking over" four out of my five years' living expenses providing. The fifth year's paying American company is rumored "taken over" by a Russian name, I have not heard rumors about how this Russian name affiliated with the money, this rumored Russian name has never been affiliated with me. This is not funny at all when I am penniless.
*One of these two American companies is an investor-company of NYC's Javits center, the other one has been Lehman Brother's investor-company. (updated on April 14th)
*These two American companies' current sizes are about $400Billion each. (updated on 04/16/2019).
----April 10th, 2019
Added item "2-1: The anger if I am the reason for those confused families lost their "confused family wealth"? " on 04-09-2019.
Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion
It seems that the big name R has a shared family habit to announce their own speculation as if an authoritative statement isTHE reason for a lot of my troubles. I heard they "have been announcing" that I don't have inheritance since 2005, which has been almost the exact same way they have been kept announcing on the radio since 2014, as you heard from, all those official public statements from the big authority R houses about everybody else's all private matters, the only difference is those since-2005-announcements are not addressed to the public audience so that my inheriting related knowing-groups never even heard of it. This is the reason for why I have been complaining that it seems nobody needs to listen to my anybody's saying regarding if I have inherited my birth grandfathers' money no matter how credible this my anybody might be, which insulted a lot of people who have tried to explain the confusion as well as kept me screaming this entire time.
I say it aloud again: My inheriting has my own inheritable and own inheriting administrative attorneys that absolutely & completely independent from any R's family wealth. My Trust-inheriting is irrelevant to any R's wealth.
----April 5th, 2019
Heard 2007's three meetings have been reasons for a lot of confusions. I heard there were three meetings in 2007 (January, June, and July respectively) intended to address some confusion regarding 2004's three meetings but resulted in broadcasting original confusion only.
June of 2007's meeting, I heard it was all about confusion if my 2004's inhering can be valid:
1: How can an inheriting without any identification verification?
03-29-2019 A challenge that I can only answer from who I am, a geek engineer and a jerk Princess
A lot of people don't realize attempting to stuck-on is an expression of desperation to be socially associated with. Is that means non-stuck-on-ers are the groups that don't care about the social association or because of never being threatened enough in their social life to be desperate?
To me, the first analytical approach would be why people associate with each other socially?
The further analysis would be on why some people turn into desperation to be a stuck-on if only felt being rejected by one or some of the above reasons? Or is that actually THE association that means all above to have such power? Or is that the only association a person can hope to be related to?
Next, my own curiosity would be a focus on if anybody can avoid such desperation if in such a situation that been set up and "ensured" to be rejected by all, such as, my current situation?
In my situation, as a lot of people have already heard, there have been so many no-association announcements for the purposes of: "don't ask if there are any intellectual incomes", "don't ask what has happened?", or "don't ask if there are any inherited money?", etc.
I heard there are more such no-association announced or about to be announced for the reason of "It is humiliating to be associated with such person...", and I heard such announcements have already started, began with five European Kingdoms, eight big names, and ten same-highschool marriages (five same junior-high schools, five same high schools).
So, for my own situation, the questions I would ask are:
Then, some immediate obvious would be:
03-28-2019 Marriage certificate represents the lawful ownership of human bodies, not the lawful ownership of any financial wealth.
The ownership of a land-lot is strictly regulated by property laws, the same as a commercial company's ownership. The Trust Registration Laws forbid taking over Trust's Wealth via updating Trust registration record. I have heard the confusion about the ownership of the land-lot and if I argued as such is too much, I say, being the sole beneficiary person "female palm" to Trusts that have been set up by some of my ancient birth grandfathers, I did argue as such to respond to some harassment.
---- March 28th, 2019
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is never lawfully owned by the husband nor by the husband's biological relative families. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱很可能根本从来就不是该丈夫的钱也根本从来就不是该丈夫血缘亲属关系的家族财产。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019
For the purpose of clarification:
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having?
据说那几个南京四中毕业的婚姻，和我同一届初中毕业的就是4个，估计南京那边闹得天翻地覆的，和他们这几个是说中文和南京话的有关。要真是如此，实在莫明奇妙至极。钱是谁的，是由法律所规范的，结婚证书只是男女裸体的法律所有权证明，并不是财产的法律所有权证明。所有的争执都是关于，这钱那钱的，根本就不是她们男人家里或者她们男人家族里的钱。不需要他们举着个结婚证书满大街的证明他们才是拥有丈夫裸体的法律所有权的人。
----2019年3月28日。
据说“有个育姓老师的家属嫁了同一个人”的传言是汽车厂创立人的家属强调说明目前的几代子孙亲属关系内还没有一个华人妻子的原因。
----2019年3月28日。
信托继承和遗嘱继承都是依据逝者所立的遗嘱，区别在于：遗嘱继承是逝者生前依据自己意愿将其所有死后留下的全部财产以一份遗嘱或多份遗嘱方式予以安排。信托继承是：财产所有人生前将其特别指定的一部分财产转入信托，委托第三方照看，并立下意愿书指定这份财产应该归谁所有。一个信托的第一方第二方分别是指信托设立人和信托受益人。如果信托设立人在其意愿书里只指定了一个信托受益人，这个被指定的唯一的信托受益人就被称为该信托的唯一受益人。信托设立人的意愿书在信托设立人去世后即成为该信托财产的遗嘱。
----2019年3月28日
03-27-2019 My parents have been provided by my Chinese ancient paternal grandparents' blessing handsomely(我父母的费用是一直由我父系的华人祖爷爷们的祝福所支付的）
Heard about five related names married to five "the same high school".
I heard all from the same junior high school: Nanjing Fourth Middle School (都是南京第四中学的初高中毕业）. I heard these five names' marriages are the sworn protection to prevent me to sneak into "children's life", so, I have to declare I (Min Fang) refuse to gift blessing such marriage(s), permanently for the past, permanently for the present, and permanently for the future.
I heard these five marriages are also the reasons for a lot of negativeness about my parents' wish to be with me in the United States, so I (Min Fang) have to declare that my own biological lawful Chinese parents have been provided, $400Million a year each on healthcare, by my own biological lawful Chinese ancient paternal grandparents' blessing.
Since 2004, the above response has been the style for all similar financial concern related arguments, one more example:
Argument: The apartments were donated by the name,
Response: But the land-lot is owned by Chinese ancient grandpa's blessing.
For the purpose of clarification:
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is lawfully owned by the husband. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱根本就不是该丈夫的钱。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having?
----March 27th, 2019
03-25-2019 If "prevention strategy" can prevent Mr. Peru Lu's money-desperation effectively? 以及·“1541年，一艘船的故事”
Heard some confusion in Chinese communities about the famous American company's ownership, I heard the confusion is from a marriage certificate owner.
I have to ask the question, is there anyone disagree that a marriage certificate represents the lawful ownership of a female' bare breasts or a male's joy of hiding in the depths of such bare breasts? Can I say if disputed is about some money's lawful ownership, should the confusion be related to a money ownership certificate?
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is lawfully owned by the husband. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说这钱那钱根本就不是丈夫的钱。）
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having?
----March 26th, 2019
提到我究竟有没有钱，就不能不提华裔社区普遍奇怪为何我敢宣布我有钱就到处查询钱在哪里，华裔社区也普遍很奇怪为何法治国家的美国会允许我如此嚣张？我的回答：其实原因很简单，我继承财产的经历是真实的，我争执公司的所有权确实是有原因，争执另一方也是事出有因。所以，当时争执双方都是必须面对争执处理困扰，不管华裔社区如何对此难以置信如何表达对我方敏难以理解的愤怒，美国执法机构也一直都是在撇清究竟什么原因造成了困扰。
据说波城及其他地区的一些华裔对我不用做工挣生活费很反感，我本人对此也是投诉这根本是在进行仇恨犯罪。我本人难以理解的就是，既然美国各级政府相关机关机构都有其相应的专业工作人员在处理和我方敏有关的事宜的情况下，为何一些华人需要个别介入私人处理，并因此对我方敏在波城的生活制造困扰？
----2019年3月26日。
有些华裔社区的困扰是关于我对丁姓私人助理家人的态度为何与对美国欧家人的态度如此不同？我的回答：原因其实也很简单的。丁姓私人助理家人对我而言，丁姓一家就是扣留了我每月一万美金生活费用达二十九年的一家人，丁姓一家就是强奸了我奶奶却要我爷爷支付我奶奶子宫费的那个人的家人，丁姓一家就是以我父亲的弟弟所假冒的我爷爷签名而企图掠夺我父亲及我方敏财产的一家人。丁姓一家至今都还在到处宣传他们有一张我爷爷签名信，说是只要我父亲有钱就必须归他们所有，其实那是一张伪造签名的信件，我父亲也在1965年当时就已经向上海市的公安机关派出所报案了，而我方敏所继承的信托也都是我方敏自己拥有的合法财产。以上就是我所听说的丁姓私人助理相关的事件真相。有人很奇怪我为何如此冷静？我的回答是生活费是由那家汇款的美国公司在处理，我的法律权益已经由美国公司的律师在保护着，当年的生活困窘，我也是因我父母为我全心的付出而受惠，所以我本人对整个事件比较冷静。
至于美国的欧家人，我所知道的，欧家两代是在美国公司做法律总顾问的，从政后也一直支持美国公司的发展，在铁路建设发展后，还经常以参赞身份到访参访公司并过问指导公司的投资建设，对于美国公司的发展也都是实质上的贡献。虽然我和美国欧家一家就美国公司发生过争执，我一直尊敬也理应珍惜欧家对于美国公司发展所做的贡献，特别是在我的法律权益是被欧家所尊重的情况下，我对欧家因为一直参与公司经营决策所产生的困扰更是理应理解。
----2019年3月26日。
03-25-2019 If "prevention strategy" can prevent Mr. Peru Lu's money-desperation effectively?
Heard some talks about "If it is this person's money...", it is rumored a Mr. Peru Lu from the U.S. Justice Departement can grant such money.
I don't know if this is a true rumor and I don't know who is this Mr. Peru Lu other than he has been featured in some negative similar rumors. For the same reason as rumored famously effective "prevention strategy" from this Mr. Peru Lu, which means in case this Mr. Peru Lu would abuse my lawful income's lawful ownership and my lawful money's lawful spending-ship, I make this following announcement: I, Min Fang, refuse this Mr. Peru Lu's any attempt to grant any of my money.
In case anyone has not heard, this famously effective "prevention strategy" has been on the public media propaganda since 2014 or so, which has been to shit me all over and to trash my all over for over 4-5 years which was after I called law enforcement's help, in order to prevent me from attempting to stuck-on any rich or not-rich males, nor to be a career successful female professional. It is rumored all advised and forcefully pushed through by this Mr. Lu's associated. Now, after this 4-5 years shits-throwing, this Mr, Lu's associated must have felt so victory of "already can take-over the money to grant"? Is this any agasp really? possibly shocking really? My reaction to this is "I have been so, and so, and SO disgusted by this pig-born type money-desperation, so, I refuse any such attempt." Well, as long as this is for the realistic prevention purpose, it should be nothing wrong for me to make this paragraph and this article as it is. I have complained to the U.S. laws about possible sexual harassment and hate crime that conducted via the public media.
This prevention purpose is for the reason that it is rumored this "grant-money" started from a joke on July 1st of 2004 when everyone "doubts" whose money I was spending, I was asked how to split my wealth between my possible biological birth children. I was asked if I would be willing to give some money to the biological birth child(ren) from rumored possibly "willing Ford-father" and "willing Petraeus-father, I said of course if they ask. The "willing Ford-father" asked immediately, and the "willing Petraeus-father" said he would ask if he needs to. So, according to rumors, this "willing Petraeus-father" had answered someone a favor to link-pass this request has been the reason that I have been constantly requested for money, which I have refused all. Why shouldn't I? Of course, I should refuse. I have refused all, and I will refuse all in the future.
----March 25th, 2019
Following is the version of rumored ”1541's or 1547's ship or shipment“ story that I heard of. （据说下面故事不是上海于姓的而是上海育姓的。据说他们要求目前我所宣布的由五家美国公司指示支付的一年4亿我的生活费用给付，其中三年的给付必须因为这艘船的故事而归这个于（育）家所有。简直某明奇妙。上篇中的Mr. Peru Yu是相关的一个于（育）小姐的丈夫。）
---March 25th, 2019
有关上海丁姓私人助理的于家亲爹于家亲戚们。据说，是因为“1541年的一艘船故事”而认定那笔从1967年开始的每月汇款中国一万美金应该是他们家的钱，每月汇款的那家美国公司也应该归他们家所有。于家这种说法根本是无稽之谈，1541年的那船和于家一点关系都没有。
“1541年，一艘船的故事” （“1541's ship or shipment”）
我听说的，1541年的时候，有一家欧洲国家的公司雇佣了一家欧洲国家的船运公司将其从中国购入的一批货运回欧洲销售。其中的一个中国供货商和上海的这个于家关系不太好，于家不乐意看着那家中国供货商因为这笔生意大发利市，所以，就把船给扣了，一口咬定那船是他们于家的。当时争执的结果是于家给抓了，一家子给关在牢里了。现如今，经过了四百八十年，是480年呐，于家的后人坚持认为他们家当年（1541年）是冤枉的，他们家（1541年）当时是坐拥六十多万两银子的家当，那船真有可能是他们于家的。
我听说的，因为买货的这家欧洲公司是我所继承的信托一直有投资的一家公司，所以，于家认为那几家美国公司所支付给我的生活费用给付的钱统统都应该是他们于家的，把我给气的是上蹦下跳的。他们于家认为1541年当时那船是他们于家的，我所继承的信托所投资的是那家买货的欧洲公司，怎么也被他们于家划进他们于家去了？还捎带上其他根本就没买货的公司？
据说，我这愤怒一吼，上海那边的于家听到又气上了，说我根本是岂有此理呀，那船和货根本是一家的，说那是八国联军在入侵的时候，那船根本是只鸦片船，当时没给扣押成功，实在就是对不起那些深受鸦片之害的中国老百姓。我一听，这指控还了得，赶紧上网一查，中国的第一次鸦片冲突是在1800年，不是1541年，1541年的时候也还没有八国联军。这些于家后人估计也是历史没学好，和我一样，历史事件居然能如此上下求索的滑了两百多年，吓了我一大跳。
我又赶紧问啊，当时这船和货究竟怎么回事啊？据说，于家是一腔的愤怒说于家当时有着六十万两银子的身价，凭什么那不是他们于家的船；欧洲那家船运公司是不停的嘶嘶说那一船货的单程运费都已经一百万两银子了，妈妈的，那船本身至少是五千万两银子的身价（据说船价至少是每年运费的五十倍左右）。当时就因为这个价钱的差别，船员和于家的伙计打成了一团，中国当时的官府是直接就将于家上下抓入大牢。现在，这于家又“吵回来啦？”
听说，1541年的时候，一张单人单程船票去欧洲是一万两银子，历时需一年，那船是货船，货运规模是可装一千石粮食的重量，一石的运费是一千两银子到欧洲，所以，那艘船的一趟运费是1000 石*1000 两银子每石= 一百万两银子。
所以，1541年的那船和那货真的都不是上海于家的，那家美国公司支付给我的的生活费用给付是我的。
----2019年3月23日撰写，3月24日更新。
听说了一些针对我以下这篇博文的疑问，如果我父亲方文海很坚强，为何不能长期坚守？
我的回答：是你自己在怀疑我父亲方文海是否坚强吗？那你自己可以在那个地处沙漠无人区，一年有超过半年是深埋在地下的狭小环境里独自一人坚守三年吗？如果你自己已经知道了你自己不可能，你也就已经知道了你自己不可能和我父亲比坚强，你就应该已经知道了我父亲方文海的坚强是真实，是事实。那种艰苦的工作环境不光是我爸爸一个人所需要面对的，而是所有的勘探兵都有可能面对的工作环境，我父亲他们几个能够坚守三年的，都是陆军勘探兵，所以是陆军勘探兵的坚强。（---- 2019年3月24日）
03-24-2019 我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强
我方敏和我父亲方文海，似乎很明显是被华裔社区及中华人民共和国所摒弃的。很多华人甚至表态，如果我方敏和我的父亲方文海确实是唐太宗李世民的继承人，哪里会这么惨？就算是我方敏有居额的信托财产且与个别人有一些私人矛盾， 就算我方敏在美国的傲人成就是否真实被普遍怀疑着，但我父亲方文海在有着十三亿人民的中华人民共和国的处境为何会如此凄凉？
我不知确切答案，我也在探寻答案。普通的国人确实难以核实我和我父亲是否是一千四百年前的唐太宗李世民的继承人，但为何我父亲方文海作为一介普通中华人民共和国公民的基本法律权益都没有了？为何十三亿国人对我八十多岁的老父亲方文海所表达的或愤怒或冷漠，似乎都是在表达我父亲方文海就是应该人人见而诛杀的？我父亲方文海作为一个从不热衷社交生活且已退休多年的的南京紫金山天文台的一个天文学家，为何应该被十三亿人民理解成是中华人民共和国的一个敌人？
我听说这和我父亲以前的从军经历有关。我父亲十八岁就入伍当兵，是中国人民解放军陆军的一个勘探兵。从军五年，却是终身不得享受退伍军人待遇，军龄不算做工龄，就是因为当年的一个“开除军籍”的处分。广播剧曾经对此有过报道，但我听说有很多非勘探兵的现役和退伍军人都没听懂，不知道那是部队对于我父亲他们几个人最合适的安排和最安全的保护。很多有过从军经历的人都认为那是很严重的处分，我听说有很多人甚至认为中国方面对我父亲的态度其实是在执行军事法庭当年的处罚。
以下是我方敏作为我父亲方文海的女儿依据对我父亲方文海的了解和理解所做的解释博文。
我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强
 |
| Relasionship between Trust, Investment, Wealth, Beneficiary |
Article: Confusion about this blog's publishing.
1：The confusion if my 2004's Trust-inheriting can be valid.
- Related clarifications are in the numeric section “June of 2007's meeting” of <Three meetings in 2007 and related if I inherited confusion>, just scroll down to that numeric section.
- It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
- ---- January 11th, 2020
To law professionals:
1-1: If curious how I got stuck in the "public denials" while Rockefellers got stuck in so many anxieties?
There has been doubts if I am spending my own money on my remote-type medical care, and what has been clarified by Federal Justice Department as I known of?
My answer: What I heard is: $400Million and related other payments for each of these five years I published has been verified as lawful money source, lawful given, and lawful investor tax rate. The third year's providing-Trust I published has been verified as birthmark Trust-inheriting Trust. The third year means fiscal year started on October 1 of 2016.
The current confusion is if my current medical payment has been from this published five years, and if lawful if not one of the published five. This confusion has caused a lot of employes of FBI agency and of Federal Justice department from Cinese community to be harassive and interruptive on my remote-type medical treatment. My complain is that this harassive and interruptive is beyond the disciplines of this two government agencies, and it has been unbearable to me.
So, I say, Can this generic legal concern be managed according to FBI and Justice Department's work protocols and disciplines? Those Chinese agents use their employment statuses to unauthorizely but forcefully stop my regular medical treatment has been very harmful to my biological health, not to mention how more harmful it can be from their enthusiam to conduct voluntary investiongation violently.
And, can medical providers' generic legal concern regarding if only making lawful money be addressed according to these licensed medical providers' standard procedures and protocols? Is it possible that medical and supporting staffs can imagine that they actual have some law professionals who work as their colleague(s) to protect them from this sort of concerns?
I refuse to receive voluntary & donation based medical care when I have my self-paid medicare availabe as lawful medicare program. So, from now on, I will address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-medical program that I am lawfully enrolled and has been supported by the US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department.
02-06-2020
My answer: What I heard is: $400Million and related other payments for each of these five years I published has been verified as lawful money source, lawful given, and lawful investor tax rate. The third year's providing-Trust I published has been verified as birthmark Trust-inheriting Trust. The third year means fiscal year started on October 1 of 2016.
The current confusion is if my current medical payment has been from this published five years, and if lawful if not one of the published five. This confusion has caused a lot of employes of FBI agency and of Federal Justice department from Cinese community to be harassive and interruptive on my remote-type medical treatment. My complain is that this harassive and interruptive is beyond the disciplines of this two government agencies, and it has been unbearable to me.
So, I say, Can this generic legal concern be managed according to FBI and Justice Department's work protocols and disciplines? Those Chinese agents use their employment statuses to unauthorizely but forcefully stop my regular medical treatment has been very harmful to my biological health, not to mention how more harmful it can be from their enthusiam to conduct voluntary investiongation violently.
And, can medical providers' generic legal concern regarding if only making lawful money be addressed according to these licensed medical providers' standard procedures and protocols? Is it possible that medical and supporting staffs can imagine that they actual have some law professionals who work as their colleague(s) to protect them from this sort of concerns?
I refuse to receive voluntary & donation based medical care when I have my self-paid medicare availabe as lawful medicare program. So, from now on, I will address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-medical program that I am lawfully enrolled and has been supported by the US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department.
02-06-2020
1-1: If curious how I got stuck in the "public denials" while Rockefellers got stuck in so many anxieties?
- It was since the famous "marriage proposal discussion" on July 1st of 2004 when a handsome young Mr. Rockfeller was teased.
- The innocent Mr. Rockefeller can not understand how it can be so unfair for a lady bride-to-be to bring her maiden family's same-size-wealth blessing to pass-down to her own blood birth-children but carry the groom's family name.
- The laugh was all around when the lady "bride-to-be" was negotiating, if getting married, how to self-indulge her-own-wealth while letting the "groom-to-be" to pay for all the thinkable and unthinkable for the entire marriage family for the years to come.
- Well, the "tragedy moment" happened when some Chinese parachutes jumped into the conversation to be the replacements of Rockefellers' such spending recipients, maybe from their understanding that negotiator does not have any wealth to be this teasing.
- Since that moment, I was completely dropped out of such conversation and got lost in the confusion and the public denial about if I have my own wealth from my Chinese birth grandfathers, while the entire Rockefeller names stuck in the bewilderment of why spending for years to come?
- This has been for the past big 15 years already. I still need to explain if I have my own money, while Rockefellers still fighting why it has to be their money to be spent?
- If you luckily still have that 07/01/2004's meeting-record, please verify this negotiation out and its prelude and its postlude, for some laughs and for some alerts.
- It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
- ----January 14th, 2020.
2：The confusion about if I published any Rockefellers' money as I claimed.
No, I did not publish any Rockefellers' money as I claimed.
All those companies I claimed have been doubted if this or that name's family wealth, the particular is the "Pejovic" company that I claimed as the third year's providing instruction company. This "Pejovic" company has never been owned by the "Pejovic" family historically has been clarified so that this company is not Rockefeller in-law's family wealth.
All those companies I claimed are not Rockefeller money because
- Each of all of those companies I claimed is not owned by any individual Rockefeller's name as an individual investment.
- Each of all of those companies I claimed is not owned by Rockefeller's names as the family names' shared investments.
- Each of all of those companies I claimed has never been owned by any Rockefeller's in-law's family names as the in-law's family names' shared investments.
- I am the Narylhn Khan has been verified, which proved that my wealth is from my birthmark Trust-inheriting has been the real story since 800 years ago.
- Reference: The confusion if I am an heir to ancient Chinese Emperors
- 我是乌纳可汗，这一身份被证实为真实有效究竟意味着什么？很简单的，这意味着我的财产来自家族胎记为条件的信托继承的说法从此有了事实上的依据，以胎记做为继承条件不只是那些我近代的爷爷们给我的信托。乌玉的方姓丈夫和乌玉的方姓儿子是我的两代方家家族胎记祖先，我承载他们父子两代也拥有的方家家族胎记是乌玉儿子指定我为乌玉的可汗爵位继承人的原因，乌玉是1260AD年代的历史人物忽必烈可汗的亲生女儿（不是孙女儿）。
3：The confusion about O'Connor's family name
There has been a lot of anger from O'Connor regarding my mentioning O'Connor names on my web blog. The reason I have to update my blog is to clarify some "why mention?", all the reason has been that I have been confronted fiercely or commented negatively, by O'Connor name's affiliated, regarding my inherited wealth I stated in my blog articles. So, I list my reasons why I agree there shouldn't be any mentioning for both parties:
1) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, that there shouldn't have any reason for any O'Connor affiliated to be confused about me stating my inherited wealth, nor for me to mention O'Connor name, which purely because I am not socially nor professionally associated with O'Connor name at all.
2) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, there should be no reason for me to be agitated regarding O'Connor name's family wealth, and there should be no reason for any O'Connor's name affiliated to be confused with my money and my money spending-ship, purely because O'Connor's family wealth is not associated to my inherited wealth.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
4：The confusion about my money-spending-ship and my any paid-in-full service:
I assume, all police officers and law peoples, at least in the United States, would agree with me that any money lawful ownership confusion can only be resolved by calling the police to do the law investigation, or file a civil lawsuit.
I firmly believe nobody can replace the police on law investigation or enforcing laws,
and I firmly believe nobody can replace the Judicial court on clarifying the money lawful ownership's legal confusion.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
Article: The confusion if I am an heir to ancient Chinese Emperors
I am the anointed and biological heir to my ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor 李世民：
- I am the clearly anointed heiress who has the family birthmark palms,
- I am clearly anointed by my recent generation grandfathers in their wills,
- I have the birthmark palms the same as the historically known birthmark inheriting rule of the ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Lishiming（李世民 )。
- By DNA test result, I am the offspring of a known heir of the Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor 李世民。
- 依据已知的确定为唐太宗李世民家族的胎记掌纹继承规则，
- 我是由我的近代爷爷方智仁，曾祖父方立柒，和曾曾祖父方治兴（单人旁）等的遗嘱所明确指定的生有家族掌纹胎记的继承女。
- 我的掌纹符合已知的历史上的唐太宗李世民家族的继承掌纹。
- 依据DNA鉴定，我是已知的确定为唐太宗李世民继承人的李始玉（？）的血脉子嗣孩子。
- 摘自：华人好奇："方敏，司法部是如何核实你是唐太宗李世民的继承人的？“
My promised French name for my "French Financier" newspaper entitlement:
- Le Cé'BonLieaufé WAYA(â)N-YONOH （汉译：李·奢邦丽艾傲妃·完颜育（汉名：育靓丽)）, An objective achieved French name, a combined name of my family names from my grandmother-side and my father-side (Lieu, Lee, and Fang), and my great-grandmother's maiden Jurchen Wanyan (完颜育) family I am a doroi of (a Jurchen Duke's daughter).
- Narylhn Wohnmor (pron: Narin Wohnmor；汉译：年轻初阳时候的玉纶·乌玛）, a combined name Narylhn is from my Mongolian grandmother's possible first name "Yuelun", Mongolian word "Naran" and "Hin". Wohnmor is from my Mogalian grandmother's possible Mongolian entitlement-family-name from her maiden-father Kublai Khan: Ohnmor (or Womo).
How resemblance can decide I am an heir to Chinese Tang dynasty Emperors, but can't if to Chinese Qing dynasty Emperors?
- Qing dynasty Emperors' photos are collected from publicly accessible internet. Tang dynasty Emperors' paintings are from a private collection of family portraits that I inherited together with Trusts.
- I was born to the Tang dynasty Emperors' heirship line and an acknowledged heir by Tang dynasty Emperors' entrusting letters (each settler's letter). I inherited some Trusts set up by Tang dynasty Emperors on June 30th, 2004.
- I was not born into the known Qing dynasty Emperor's household, but into an in-law's whose family has generations of intermarriage history with Qing dynasty royals.
----July 24th, 2019
Photos of Qing dynasty Emperors:
- Related article in Chinese: 07-24-2019 咸丰同治和光绪，三代清朝皇帝
Prince Gong: 恭亲王奕訢 (Previously marked as Xianfeng Emperor （咸丰皇帝）)
These photos obviously presented a northern man's roughness. This is also what I look like very often when I was in college, especially when I was tired or exhausted sitting around bathing in the sun with a blank look and shining forehead. This resemblance possible are all the reasons that so many same-college-graduated so eagerly to tell how ugly I was in my college time.
Kuang Hsu Emperor （光绪皇帝）：
My obvious resemblance with Kuang Hsu Emperor has been clearly recorded in a 1996's photo which I used for my first-ever Chinese passport. Another 1982's or 1983's photo, with other four girls from the same junior high school, also showed this obvious resemblance but with a hint of the resemblance to Xianfeng Emperor that made it the reason of being the evidence that "I am so ugly". The resemblance displayed on that magazine's cover page photo is possibly the "so so look" in a lot of telling regarding if I am never a fairy tale beauty. If you noticed that my chin is obviously not a resemble chin, I heard I got my chin from an ancient Mongolian grandmother of mine.
----July 24th, 2019
Kuang Hsu Emperor （光绪皇帝）：
My obvious resemblance with Kuang Hsu Emperor has been clearly recorded in a 1996's photo which I used for my first-ever Chinese passport. Another 1982's or 1983's photo, with other four girls from the same junior high school, also showed this obvious resemblance but with a hint of the resemblance to Xianfeng Emperor that made it the reason of being the evidence that "I am so ugly". The resemblance displayed on that magazine's cover page photo is possibly the "so so look" in a lot of telling regarding if I am never a fairy tale beauty. If you noticed that my chin is obviously not a resemble chin, I heard I got my chin from an ancient Mongolian grandmother of mine.
----July 24th, 2019
To all who are concerning:
Between 1850-1903, there were two sets of multi-ship groups sending out some treasures from China, I heard all experienced tragedies with theoretically no survival, and I heard some such sunk-ships have been discovered and have research papers published as well. Also, the ship-discovering organization is a Corporate which means it is a non-public stock company., Please verify this information.
1850年-1903年，有两批由多艘船只组成的船队装载财宝由中国通过海运送往外国。我听说，这是很多人在查找的钱财，我赶紧告知我听说的：所有这些船只都遭遇了海难事故，相关的沉船也已经陆续被发现了，也已有了相关的研究论文发表过。也听说了发现沉船的机构是一家非上市股票公司(所发行的股票没有上市交易的股票公司）。请查询这批财宝的人员查实此信息。
----2019年8月3日
My great-grandmother born in 1892 or so in Shanghai of China, her maiden Jurchen Duke family had lived in Shanghai area before 1541. My great-grandfather was (possibly) mothered by a royal daughter of Qing dynasty Emperor Hong Taiji （皇太极) and no other further roral marriage till his own marriage with my great-grandmother in 1911 or so.
我的曾祖母是1892年左右在中国上海出生的，她娘家在1541年之前就已经是是女真贝勒（公爵），也在1541年之前就已经居住在上海地区了。 我曾祖父的祖奶奶可能是清朝皇帝皇太极（1592-1643)的 一个女儿，之后我家就没有和任何清朝皇室后裔联姻，直至我曾祖父于1911年左右和我曾祖母结婚。
----2019年8月3日
To all whose family name is Yu (育) :
- If you are confused if being affiliated to Manchuria doroi beile Yu (满族旗人育贝勒), please use your family name in Tungusic Jurchen (Manchu) language to differentiate with its Chinese mandarin translation of Yu (育). My great grandmother's maiden family is Jurchen(Manchu) doroi beile Yu. I am sorry I don't my great-grandmother's maiden Jurchen family name but Baylor Yu is a very well-known Jurchen (Manchu) noble to Jurchen (Manchu) nobles. (--updated on August 2nd, 2019)
- My great grandmother's maiden family name, the doroi beile Yu's family name, in Tungusic Jurchen (Manchu) language, isWanyan, YOYA-NORA (汉文：完颜·优育诺吒或wan'yan优育哪吒). (--updated on July 27th, August 2nd, 2019, 08/16)
- Clarification：My great grandmother's maiden family name, the Jurchen (Manchu) doroi beile Yu (满族旗人育贝勒), is the Jurchen doroi beile of the Wanyan，YOYA NORA house（完颜育）, not the Qing dynasty doroi beile of Aisin Gioro house. (----updated on July 29th, August 2nd, 2019)
- Wikipedia: History doroi beile entitlement,
- Wikipedia: The Qing dynasty doroi beile Yu of Aisin Gioro house （清朝的豫亲王 ）， this was the Qing dynasty Prince whose then entitlement-residence was sold to Rockefeller Foundation in 1915. (----updated on July 29th, 2019)
- Wikipedia: The Qing dynasty doroi beile Yu of Aisin Gioro house （清朝的裕亲王 ）
My promised French name for my "French Financier" newspaper entitlement:
- My French name: Mademoiselle Le Cé'BonLieaufé YOYA-NORA. (中文：李·奢邦丽艾傲妃·优育诺咤. An objective achieved but may not yet perfect French name, a combined name of my family names from my grandmother-side and my father-side (Lieu, Lee, and Fang). --updated on July 27th, 2019)
- Updated my French name to Le Cé'BonLieaufé WAYA(â)N-YONOH （汉译：李·奢邦丽艾傲妃·完颜育（汉名：育靓丽)）, to reflect the more appropriate family name in French: WAYA(â)N-YONOH （汉译：完颜育）----August 16th, 2019.
In Mangolian（蒙古语）：
Naran (Sun，太阳) =》Nar；
Hin (Young，年轻）=》hn；
My grandmother's possible first name "Yuush（雅悠诗）" =》ysh；
My Mongolian grandmother is rumored to have given an entitlement family name by her maiden father Kublai Khan: "Ohnmar (Womo），（汉音译：“乌玛（乌莫）”）=》Wohnmar。
The meaning of my British name Naryshn Wohnmor: Young rising sun Yuush Ohnmar (Womo).
我的英国名字的意思是“年轻初阳时候的雅悠诗·乌玛”）
----2019年8月26日。
Article: Elements to recognize an opportunity to succeed
Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:
About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the curiosities have been about if I did what I was asked.
Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:
- Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?
- Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?
- Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?
About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the curiosities have been about if I did what I was asked.
- I was asked to take a look at this bank's technology network as an outsider security specialist.
- I did find out there is a security gap between securing physical access to money via internet money-transferring, and regular information security provided by the bank's technology department.
- I did help out upgrading the bank's security aspect in physical access to money via internet transferring, by establishing a quality mechanism to let physical access security specialists extend their specialty to include securing internet money-transferring access, with the technology department's help.
- 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
About movie Avatar, the curiosities have been about why those nonsense talks can be so valuable.
- I recognized the frustrations expressed were about no available means to achieve the desired camera-images nor the special effects.
- From my work experiences as a computer program on image processing, I identified all these frustrations can be helped by computerized image handling.
- I did help out advising how to upgrade image-processing software for digital cameras as well as for digit editing tools.
----July 16th, 2019
About Viagra, the curiosities have been about how I can contribute without participating in any lab work.
About Viagra, the curiosities have been about how I can contribute without participating in any lab work.
- I recognized the frustrations were all about the known medical dilemma that blood vessels in the sponge area don't react according to the regular mechanism for blood pressure adjustment medications.
- From my research experiences as a computer programmer, I realized this can be helped by re-consider the research hypothesis in order to isolate the area as an independent module.
- I did help out advising how to develop some isolating hypotheses and related.
- The rumored public relation category reward is actually in the intellectual category, for the research facilities' commercial rental savings related.
----July 16th, 2019
About the radio program, the curiosities have been about how I won the deal.
About China, the curiosities have been what are my contributions to China's modern economic development.
About China, the curiosities have also been what are my contributions to China's overall.
About the radio program, the curiosities have been about how I won the deal.
- I recognized the frustration as a listener that the U.S. radio industry has not much other than music playing. I also recognized the opportunity to save producing costs can be from if the deal can improve the turnover of available resources.
- I realized an interesting, funny, inspirational and educational radio program to satisfy everyone's curiosity on how to achieve one's own American dream can be great as a popular alternative hotspot hour to iconic kinds of music.
- I did provide the radio program's producing hypothesis as the following: Based on my life experiences before 2004, and for the purpose to help the public audience to recognize THE opportunity to achieve success, this radio program would be produced with good story-telling, fun materials and reality practicality, to analyze the key factors of each success story, to introduce related backgrounds and related knowledge tips to the public, and to provide inspirational & informational ideas on how to catch THE opportunity as well.
About China, the curiosities have been what are my contributions to China's modern economic development.
- Agriculture development in harsh geographic areas can be based on specially designed greenhouses.
- Megacities' transportations can be improved via "the objective is being convenient and for the strategic development" in its architecture design.
- Suzhou city's development can rely on its historic expertise of "manufacturing Shanghai design".
- The objectives of geographic areas' strategic development can be "a characteristic economy with quality living".
About China, the curiosities have also been what are my contributions to China's overall.
- Via the radio program, I introduced, to the world, the Chinese modern history to help the understanding of the Chinese Communist Party who took over the sovereign of China through cruel wars.
- Via the 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony, I introduced, to the world, the Chinese cultural history to help the understanding of modern China's characteristic political-economic developments.
Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:
About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the curiosities have been about if I did what I was asked.
- Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?
- Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?
- Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?
About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the curiosities have been about if I did what I was asked.
- I was asked to take a look at this bank's technology network as an outsider security specialist.
- I did find out there is a security gap between securing physical access to money via internet money-transferring, and regular information security provided by the bank's technology department.
- I did help out upgrading the bank's security aspect in physical access to money via internet transferring, by establishing a quality mechanism to let physical access security specialists extend their specialty to include securing internet money-transferring access, with the technology department's help.
- 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
About 3D movie Avatar, the curiosities have been about why those nonsense talks can be so valuable.
- I recognized the frustrations expressed were about no available means to achieve the desired camera-images nor the special effects.
- From my work experiences as a computer program on image processing, I identified all these frustrations can be helped by computerized image handling.
- I did help out advising how to upgrade image-processing software for digital cameras as well as for digit editing tools.
- This is the prelude of the customer-order quality technology in the famous JPM Chase technology upgrade. I was a translator between the movie-business and the digital camera manufacturer(s), and a customized-technology camera(s) ordering person in the conversation. (--added 08/07/2019 ）
----July 16th, 2019
About Viagra, the curiosities have been about how I can contribute without participating in any lab work.
About Viagra, the curiosities have been about how I can contribute without participating in any lab work.
- I recognized the frustrations were all about the known medical dilemma that blood vessels in the sponge area don't react according to the regular mechanism for blood pressure adjustment medications.
- From my research experiences as a computer programmer, I realized this can be helped by re-consider the research hypothesis in order to isolate the area as an independent module.
- I did help out advising how to develop some isolating hypotheses and related.
- The rumored public relation category reward is actually in the intellectual category, for the research facilities' commercial rental savings related.
----July 16th, 2019
About the radio program, the curiosities have been about how I won the deal.
About China, the curiosities have been what are my contributions to China's modern economic development.
About China, the curiosities have also been what are my contributions to China's overall.
以下摘自：《方家小姐扮作家 - 我方敏的成就究竟是什么？》
我方敏的科技职业成就：
以下中文摘自：07-25-2019 我方敏对中国所做的贡献究竟是什么？
我方敏对中华人民共和国经济发展的贡献是于2004年所做的以下建议：
我方敏对中华人民共和国文化的贡献是：
About the radio program, the curiosities have been about how I won the deal.
- I recognized the frustration as a listener that the U.S. radio industry has not much other than music playing. I also recognized the opportunity to save producing costs can be from if the deal can improve the turnover of available resources.
- I realized an interesting, funny, inspirational and educational radio program to satisfy everyone's curiosity on how to achieve one's own American dream can be great as a popular alternative hotspot hour to iconic kinds of music.
- I did provide the radio program's producing hypothesis as the following: Based on my life experiences before 2004, and for the purpose to help the public audience to recognize THE opportunity to achieve success, this radio program would be produced with good story-telling, fun materials and reality practicality, to analyze the key factors of each success story, to introduce related backgrounds and related knowledge tips to the public, and to provide inspirational & informational ideas on how to catch THE opportunity as well.
About China, the curiosities have been what are my contributions to China's modern economic development.
- Agriculture development in harsh geographic areas can be based on specially designed greenhouses.
- Megacities' transportations can be improved via "the objective is being convenient and for the strategic development" in its architecture design.
- Suzhou city's development can rely on its historic expertise of "manufacturing Shanghai design".
- The objectives of geographic areas' strategic development can be "a characteristic economy with quality living".
About China, the curiosities have also been what are my contributions to China's overall.
- Via the radio program, I introduced, to the world, the Chinese modern history to help the understanding of the Chinese Communist Party who took over the sovereign of China through cruel wars.
- Via the 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony, I introduced, to the world, the Chinese cultural history to help the understanding of modern China's characteristic political-economic developments.
以下摘自：《方家小姐扮作家 - 我方敏的成就究竟是什么？》
我方敏的科技职业成就：
- 2004年6月，我方敏是推动电讯业变革的手机智能化的主要决策关键性推动者之一；（即自2004年6月30日的会议结束，手机智能化已经没有了难以预料的科研难题，其后的变革实践中也没有难以克服的科研瓶颈。----2019年8月11日）
- 2004年7月-2007年1月，我方敏是推动电脑行业从以发明为主的新兴工业转为有严格质量检测管理标准可以提供来客加工的成熟工业的主要决策关键性推动者之一。(即2007年我离开摩根大通银行后，电脑行业的成熟工业化进程已经没有了难以预料的变革难题，其后的成熟化实践中也没有难以克服的变革瓶颈。----2019年8月11日）
- 电脑安全系统，我方敏是推动信息传导安全和银行系统安全的主要决策关键性推动者之一。1）自2004年1月以后，信息传导安全不光强调敏感信息必须保密安全，也加强了信息传导通道的保密安全；2）2007年1月以后，网络财经安全不光强调网络信息安全，也加强了网络金融安全。----2019年8月11日
以下中文摘自：07-25-2019 我方敏对中国所做的贡献究竟是什么？
我方敏对中华人民共和国经济发展的贡献是于2004年所做的以下建议：
- 沙漠兴农依大棚，（即“沙漠兴农，依托农业科技特殊大棚”，--2019年8月7日增）
- 地铁便民依规划，（即“城交城建，强化地铁规划便民新兴”；--2019年8月7日增）
- 苏州加工依上海，（即“苏州发展，起步加工产业上海设计”，--2019年8月7日增）
- 地域发展依配套。（即“地域经济，发展特色经济品质生活”。--2019年8月7日增）
- 通过广播剧集，向世界介绍了中国的现代史，让世界理解了当年以战争夺权的中国共产党人；
- 通过奥运创意，向世界介绍了中国的人文史，让世界理解了如今以特色立足的中国政贸经济。
----2019年7月25日。
Article: Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion
Note:
If anyone curious about what exactly this article means, this someone's curiosity can be helped by asking an own friend in the attorney profession to help out the reading. It truly means my any money is irrelevant with any Rockefeller's any wealth, legally, financially and materially (April 8th, 2019). This is a lengthy article, but please ask your own friend in the attorney profession to read it entirely (April 25th, 2019).
About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the complaints have been about if I did what I was asked.
- I was asked to take a look at this bank's technology network as an outsider security specialist.
- I did find out there is a security gap between securing physical access to money via internet money-transferring, and regular information security provided by the bank's technology department.
- I did help out upgrading the bank's security aspect in physical access to money via internet transferring, by establishing a quality mechanism to let physical access security specialists extend their specialty to include securing internet money-transferring access, with the technology department's help.
- 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase
Widely shared negativizes about me is how I dis-appreciated the gentlemen from 2003's Hyatt Regional Hotel's reception lobby, especially after I got the deal of the radio program that helped me to be handsomely financially independent (June 21st, 2019). Actually, it is not appropriate to imply so after the broadcasting of the story featuring his friend's presence upon his wife's request on that very next day at the bar of the same Hyatt Regional. Also, the radio program deal was my successful hard-sale which was 100 % totally, completely and factually based on a very shrewd market segment analysis of the radio industry(June 21st, 2019). and the true reason how I got that radio program can only be best described as similar to the famous IKEA model from Harvard Business Case. It landed my radio program a leading National broadcasting channel, a best broadcasting window and a rebroadcasting window, unlimited free & full access to a fully equipped recording studio, a ready producing team, a ready promotion team, and ready supporting resources fully provided free by the Radio company. All in July 1st of 2004's meeting-record. (June 22nd, 2019).
Reference of chronicle complaints about Rockefeller(s): Chronicles updates of events
Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion
It seems that the big name R has a shared family habit to announce their own speculation as if an authoritative statement is THE reason for a lot of my troubles. I heard they "have been announcing" that I don't have inheritance since 2005, which has been almost the exact same way they have been kept announcing on the radio since 2014, as you heard from, all those official public statements from the big authority R houses about everybody else's all private matters, the only difference is those since-2005-announcements are not addressed to the public audience so that my inheriting related knowing-groups never even heard of it. This is the reason for why I have been complaining that it seems nobody needs to listen to my anybody's saying regarding if I have inherited my birth grandfathers' money no matter how credible this my anybody might be, which insulted a lot of people who have tried to explain the confusion as well as kept me screaming this entire time.
I say it aloud again: My inheriting has my own inheritable and own inheriting administrative attorneys that absolutely & completely independent from any R's family wealth. My Trust-inheriting is irrelevant to any R's wealth.
Reference of chronicle complaints about Rockefeller(s): Chronicles updates of events
----April 5th, 2019
Heard 2007's three meetings have been reasons for a lot of confusions. I heard there were three meetings in 2007 (January, June, and July respectively) intended to address some confusion regarding 2004's three meetings but resulted in broadcasting original confusion only.
June of 2007's meeting, I heard it was all about confusion if my 2004's inhering can be valid:
1: How can an inheriting without any identification verification?
- My inheriting day was June 30th of 2004, my inheriting related identification verification was January of 2004, I was not asked to present my photo identification was because I was presented with the attorney in my U.S. resident immigration application attorney's office where all my identification (photo ID and legal documentation) were in records.
2: How can anyone inherit a company when being objected at the inheriting moment already?
3: How can anyone inherit without public known inheritable nor public-known inheriting attorneys?
My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.
The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.
What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.
Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).
How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.
----March 16th, 2019
My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,
If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.
----March 17th, 2019
January of 2007's meeting, I heard the clarification included:
* non-staff means employed but not on the payroll, similar to college's honor professor, sit-in professor for the semester(s), faculty, staff, etc.
I heard anger illustrated in July of 2007's meeting was regarding why the Chinese government tolerated a nobody in the U.S. military's name to insult the Chinese government?
Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies:
I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
- On June 30th of 2004, I was being objected the eligibility to inherit several U.S. companies, but my 2004's inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was actually Trust-Inheriting which should not involve any specific business investment company so that those objections in 2004 to against me inheriting those companies were irrelevant to my Trust-Inheriting.
- All those companies, who expressed objection on June 30th of 2004 as mentioned above, have never been owned by any Rockefeller name, nor any Ford name, nor any Walton name. ( reference link of how to verify a company's lawful ownership --updated on 04-03-2019)
- It is rumored there were other inheriting events on the same day of June 30th of 2004 as well. All were irrelevant events because each had different wealth to be inherited and each had different inheriting administrative attorneys groups. Family inheriting normally administered by attorneys who are known to inheriting families. (--updated on 04-03-2019)
- How to tell it is irrelevant or not-inheriting? The paid-out is gifting or Trust-annuity payment is different on money recipient's income tax type and income tax rate. Gifting is gift tax, Trust-annuity payment can be either ( Form 1040) yearly income tax or based on each annuity payment's investor tax. I am qualified for investor tax. (01/11/2020)
- How to tell Trust-inheriting validly inherited the Trust's investment chain? Same to all investors who bought stock shares from all public-traded corporations that have each's own downstream corporation-investment-adventures. 2004's rejections were from those equivalent to corporation-investment adventures, Trust I inherited is equivalent to a stock-owner of a public-traded corporation,. (01/11/2020)
2-1: The anger if I am the reason for those confused families lost their "confused family wealth"? (--updated on 04-09-2019)
- The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to company registration historical records and commercial registration laws, those objecting companies are not part of the wealth of those confused families, which means those confused families historically never own those companies so that they never lost their "confused family wealth".
- The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to Trust laws, Trusted wealth is beneficiary owned wealth since the date of the establishment of the Trust, which means a company-ownership confusion is not the reason for anyone to "take over" such already owned Trusted wealth, which is also according to Trust laws.
- The efforts have been on clarifying that, those confused families did not lose any of their family wealth because of my birth nor because of my Trust-inheriting.
- All these companies have never been owned by Rockefeller holdings, nor any individual Rockefeller, nor any individual Rockefeller's any marriage partner(s). ----August 12th, 2019
- My 2004's inheriting was a sole beneficiary person's Trust-Inheriting, my inheritable was some Trusts set up by some of my birth Chinese grandfathers, so no reading needed.
- My Inheriting attorneys are those Trusts' entrusting attorneys who have no reason to be known to the public because of the nature that my Trust-Inheriting is a private inheriting event.
- My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.
- It is amnounced that I am eligible to pay investor income tax rate for all these paid-outs(06/26/2019).
- Due to the private nature of inheriting, a signature is not the deciding factor in validating wealth inheriting after financial wealth's lawful ownership is already lawfully factually validly transferred.
- I entrusted my newly inherited wealth to June 30th of 2004's same entrusting attorneys' groups. I expressed my willingness to entrust my newly inherited Trusts on the same inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004.
- My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.
My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.
The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.
What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.
Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).
How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.
----March 16th, 2019
My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,
If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.
----March 17th, 2019
January of 2007's meeting, I heard the clarification included:
- 1: Eligibility for a veteran status is enlisted after a full year.
- 2: A researching non-staff military strategist only has commanding power when on assignment.
- 3: U.S. uniform personnel cannot be hostility to the United States nor the banking industry
* non-staff means employed but not on the payroll, similar to college's honor professor, sit-in professor for the semester(s), faculty, staff, etc.
I heard anger illustrated in July of 2007's meeting was regarding why the Chinese government tolerated a nobody in the U.S. military's name to insult the Chinese government?
- I did not attend July of 2007's meeting, I did not attend any of 2007's meetings.
- The rumored insulting was about what I said regarding the Chinese-Japanese war, and confusion was based on the fact that war was an invasion to China. I was only expressing my understanding about that war from the aspect of war strategy. The talk was never a deny regarding that war was an invasion to China.
- I am a birth child (possibly an heir) from the famous Chinese Emperors of Tang dynasty was acknowledged since 1989 by a lot of historians from a lot of Chinese colleges.
Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies:
I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
- The first year's settler was Tang dynasty's Emperor Xuanzong（唐玄宗李隆基), at about 1300 years ago. The known heir of the Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong(唐太宗李世民), both featured in those published paintings which were copies from the digital version of those original ancient family portraits.
- The second year's settler was painter Zhang, Guotao（国画大师张国焘), at about 800 years ago. He was a famous painter in China, one of whose paintings was discovered with the royal collection stamp that cost all his non-heir children been prosecuted by the Emperor of the Song dynasty. I heard this painter's private (royal) collection stamp is identified as the same or characteristically same to the royal collection stamps from the Chinese Tang dynasty and the Chinese Southern Tang dynasty.
- The third year's settler was Southern Tang dynasty's Emperor Yuanzong (南唐中主唐元宗李璟), and at about 1000 years ago.
- The fourth and fifth years' settlers were father and son. The father was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wenzong(唐文宗李昂) and the son was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wuzong(唐武宗李瀍), at about 1200 years ago. These two Emperors are historically known heir-grandsons of famous Chinese Tang dynasty's Emperor Taizong and Emperor Xuanzong.
Article: Complaints about Rockefellers
03-31-2019's next day: Three meetings in 2007 to address but result in broadcasting original confusion about three meetings in 2004
All these companies have never been owned by Rockefeller holdings, nor any individual Rockefeller, nor any individual Rockefeller's any marriage partner(s). ----August 12th, 2019
A tip: How to verify whose money or who is the investor? One simple way is to verify from "stock certificate number" or the ownership registration record, which is the evidence of lawful investor-ship and lawful ownership of the linked dividend-profit, another way is to verify the signature from a holder of such certificate.
Rockefellers' insist-on claiming ownership of any U.S. money that I am expecting but without presenting such valid certificate nor such valid signature from holder family senior of such certificate has been my huge complaints.
----July 29th, 2019
Note:
If anyone curious about what exactly this article means, this someone's curiosity can be helped by asking an own friend in the attorney profession to help out the reading. It truly means my any money is irrelevant with any Rockefeller's any wealth, legally, financially and materially (April 8th, 2019). This is a lengthy article, but please ask your own friend in the attorney profession to read it entirely (April 25th, 2019).
Chronicle updates:
国内一些误解是关于我们一家是否“家传痴傻”，可能是出于丁姓私人助理一家的亲生经历。他们对我们家的立场似乎是见钱就拿见，见东西就搬，把我爷爷奶奶家都搬空了，一家三个孩子两个大人都是很不在乎还继续欢迎他们一家上门做客，把我爷爷去世时留下的一共六万余元银行存款拿了一半左右，而三个孩子都还是他们一家很好的朋友。我方敏对此的说明：我曾祖父的突然去世对当时很年轻的我爷爷影响很大，所以，包括我父亲在内的四个孩子，都是在7岁生日那天就已经拿到了我爷爷所给予所分配的家产（家里传统：女孩70多万，男孩一百五十万）。在物价便宜的1950年前后，四个孩子每人每年1%的利息就是七千元或上万元，超越我爷爷奶奶留给他们自己的每年生活费用及家里的全部家当，这才是当时在上海生活的三个孩子及我的爷爷奶奶毫不在意的主要原因。另一个原因可能是：丁姓私人助理是和我爷爷奶奶同岁的，而丁家太太是我爷爷一个同龄社交女友的唯一孩子。----2019年7月20日。
I was blamed for picking up on O'Connor name to have my own-wealth fight. This has been a misunderstanding. I misunderstood my Trust-inheriting as three companies inheriting was the reason for such confusion. The situation in 2016 was: I was aware one of such companies did send out $500Million as I requested in 2004 but somehow I could not receive it, and I was relentlessly trying to contact another such company's accounting representative to inquire my inheriting. So, it is most appropriate to say that I was triggered to have anxiety over the O'Connor name by if they invested confusion during the period of time when I can't get an answer for my inheriting-inquiry. ----July 20th, 2019
中国的文革期间，“当街杀人，随后抄家”，是被作为过国家英雄奖励的；现在的中国政府国家宣传似乎也是，“如果能够为钱杀人，是在响应中国政府号召，是在全世界范围内实现中国的共产主义，是应该被中国政府当作国家英雄的。”我方敏本人再加上一条投诉，为何中国政府的宣传是表达“在私人住宅的私用厕所里安装摄像机镜头并通过卫星播放女人在自家厕所洗澡画面，是应该被认为是中国共产主义行为的实现”？----2019年7月8日。
Widely shared negativeness about me in the entertainment industry is how I disappreciated the gentlemen from 2003's Hyatt Regional Hotel's reception lobby, especially after I got the deal of the radio program that helped me to be handsomely financially independent. It was well known that so many entertainment industry's personnel had turned-off on me after only $7Million in total for the radio program's possible investment was announced. I have to say I truly appreciate Mr. Hyatt's gentleman's kindness, and I am sorry that I failed such public expectation in expressing my appreciation. The different understanding between me and the entertainment industry was caused by what happened after that only $7Million in total possible investment was announced. That radio program deal was my successful hard-sale which was 100 % totally, completely and factually based on a very shrewd market segment analysis of the radio industry. This radio program deal was the deal made me the famous "a salesperson" entitlement inside the salesperson profession. All these were in the original meeting record of July 1st of 2004, all have been acknowledged by the radio company, and all have been protected by the United States laws. ----June 21st, 2019
以我2004年7月1日以成功的大规模创造投资就业机会而成名之前的生活经历，及我对生活中很多事物的想法和感悟为主线，介绍我得以成功的原因，基础和机遇，并扩充基本知识和背景常识的介绍，同时兼顾趣味性，生活感和故事性。Radio program's hypothesis: Based on the huge success of how I can massively create investment and employment opportunities on June 30th and July 1st of 2004, based on my life experiences before July 1st of 2004 as well as my understanding and thoughts about everything or anything in my life, to introduce what it takes to succeed, to introduce possible reasons, backgrounds and opportunities of my each successful creation of some investment and employment opportunities, to introduce related background information and background specialty knowledge that is useful in everyone;s daily life and helpful for succeeders to recognize and catch THE opportunity, etc,, with good story-telling, fun materials, and reality practicality.
----2019年6月11日, from https://somebodyinma.blogspot.com/
A Mr. David Rockefeller from the 2003 Hyatt Regional, not the bar person from the same the 2003 Hyatt Regional, needs to realize the bar person is at least a day possible to confuse anyone about if forgot Rockefellers' family education of "No Fucking, No money" so famously published already. So I say to this Mr. David Rockefeller of the 2003 Hyatt Regional, please stop confusing anyone if my money can be possibly associate with your sexuality after your marriage family's friendly bar person's story had been so loudly broadcasted. ----June 12th, 2019
It is very annoying when family-seniors don't educate youngers enough about how to know what is the family wealth. The good example of "so annoying" is Rockefellers' younger generation insisting on stating I dared to claim those five companies in this blog article has to mean the intention of taking over their family wealth, which can be proved to be so absurd because all these companies never paid ESTATE TAX for any of their seniors.-Some said my tone is very annoying as well, as if I am not their own generation but their uncles', I say why would it matter at all after all those "no association" announcements, but I can imagine my parents finally can breathe some easiness about educatable.---June 9th, 2019.
Heard the best way to know what is going on is to check out any edition of any author's <Trust law Textbook> from any law school for chapters on beneficiary's possible situation and how Trust laws have been evolved in order to protect effectively, which are the explanation of what has been going on word-by-word. 想了解什么是信托及信托法，最好的办法就是读一读法学院的《信托法教材》，想知道我的故事究竟是怎么回事，就读一读《信托法教材》里的有关“受益人的可能处境及原因分析”和信托法是如何演变的历史。据说我和我父母的经历就是《信托法教材》里每字每句的描述及说明为何《信托法》必须如此这般制定才可以有效保护。----May 28th, 2019
华裔社区这种负面言论比较多，一个原因是因为我所有的那些由奖励公司已经发放的智慧专利都没有收到过（其中绝大部分安全，但有一些已被提领了超过10年），另一个可能原因就是这些专利收入被一些人提领了之后所故意制造的负面言论以企图将我的领款者身份彻底换掉的（智慧专利一般是分期五十年付款的）。目前，我认为我所面临的负面情绪负面言论主要来自三大块：1：那些过去十多年已经提领了我的智慧专利收入的一些人；2：当年（1967年7月至1996年10月)拿到每月一万美金中的一部分的一些人；3：想要提领我的信托所支付给我和我父母三人的生活费用的一些人。----原稿于2019年5月21日，5月24日修改。
中国自己制定的继承法就是中国文化中国传统里面有关继承的道理，中国人民台湾人民依据中国传统地方特色与时俱进所制定的中国法律台湾法律就是依据中国文化传统的中国道理，信托继承在台湾在中国大陆在欧洲在亚洲，都和我在美国的信托继承是一样的法律。----May 12th, 2019
抗争法律权益？发动群众运动？改变社会制度？ ---- May 10th, 2019
“只有没有现钱在手上，就不能说是谋财害命”的说法：
我方敏是从未参军且1996年离开中国后就一直居住国外的，我父亲方文海1956年就已经被中国的军事法庭裁决为开除军籍后就离开了中国人民解放军，谁是中国人民解放军的现役军人属于中国军法管辖范围？我方敏现在公开表态不愿意我本人被中国政府通过军事协作而谋杀，不愿意我父母方文海王博贤被谋杀，并且愿意看着司法执法机关可以公平的捍卫受害人利益。我方敏公开指控中国国家主席国家军委主席习近平篡党夺权，完全无视中国人民解放军是由中国宪法所规定的中国共产党领导下的军队，将中国人民解放军作为其私人武装力量，滥用职权协助卖淫，抢劫和谋财害命等中国法律所界定的刑事犯罪行为。（参阅：03-24-2019 南京方面的矛盾（22）---- 被开除军籍的处罚？我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强 ）
----2019年5月8日。
有关预留分继承(legitimate, legitimate portion)：
05-03-2019 (I) “至少应该有这么多“说法的起源
05-03-2019 (II) 究竟什么是预留分继承？
----May 4th, 2019
My 2004 inheriting was Trust-Inheriting which does not have any legitime portion (legitima portio).
爷爷为我设立信托是1948年以中华民国公民的身份在英国租界地的香港设立的，爷爷是在1965年才以中华人民共和国公民身份在上海去世的，我本人是2004年以中华人民共和国公民身份在美国继承该信托，我爷爷子女在1965年已经分家产继承了我爷爷方智仁的遗产，我爷爷子女的1965年分家产遗产继承及我本人2004年的信托继承都不涉及台湾的继承法。(04-29-2019 信托继承是没有预留分的，即使按照台湾法律，信托继承都是遗嘱完全有效的继承。）
----April 29th, 2019
Please don't be overly concerned if you heard the President of the U.S, U.S. Foreign Department, and U.S. Treasury Department have all announced negatively about if I could possibly have any money to be called lawfully private wealth. It may be just some confusion caused by arguments of "What exactly is the difference between the legal and other administrative components of a government?" to be announced as strong evidence of NO MONEY.
What about the Chinese government's announcement of "China doesn't need your type of talent"? I agree to the saying that it is hard to know unless it can be cleared from the U.S. about what is my type of talent that was told to China.
----April 28nd, 2019
If you heard confusing announcements about money matters as well as ridiculous romance matters, please read this article with the help provided by your friend who is in the attorney profession, and to address your confusion regarding such announcements to this attorney friend of yours.
Example: confusion caused by arguments of "what exactly is the definition of an investor" or "what exactly can be covered by a medical insurance plan" to be announced as strong evidence of NO MONEY.
----April 22nd, 2019
信托投资是通过财务经理所管理的投资组合，自己拿钱出来投资办厂开公司是属于自己直接管理的投资。洛克菲勒家族是带着钱从奥地利或者德国来美国投资的，洛克菲勒家族是因为投资Standard Oil 石油公司发了家，福特家族是从英国或者爱尔兰带着钱来美国的，福特家族是因为投资福特汽车公司发了家。如果“1941年的四十万美金”传言中的方智祥他们家当时带了这笔四十万美金来美国投资，就属于是这种情况了，也就是看他们当时投资的公司有没有发财了。我在美国的投资都是通过我所继承的信托进行投资和投资组合的，不是我自己直接带着钱来美国然后自己直接拿钱出来投资的，而他们都是自己带钱来美国自己直接进行投资的，所以，我一直说我所继承的钱及我的信托在美国的投资，与洛克菲勒家的钱以及福特家族的钱是完全不搭界的也没有任何关系的。----2019年4月21日
In 2017-2019, I have complained to the law enforcing agencies that Rockefeller name has sexually harassed me through the public channel media and through glasshouse cancer treatment-related medical facilities, I have complained to the law enforcing agencies that Rockefeller name has taken my radio company's major featured person fee of $3Billion - $4Billion entirely (avg $26Million - $35Million per month for 10 years). ----April 17th, 2019
The company's ownership confusion can be illustrated as: The Federal Commerce Department has instructed the Commerce Department Boston office to write payment-check for my living expenses because I am a Bostonian who has inherited a Trust that has some business dealing with the Federal Commerce Department, the ownership confused families thought they have owned the Commerce Department Boston office already and entirely because of their generationally close work relationship, while the Commerce Department Boston office speak-person kept explaining the paying-instruction was from the federal but the entire commerce department is not the payer of my living expenses. This is the same reason that my Trust's entrusting attorneys were very quiet when I was vertically multiplying objected by the entire Commerce Department Office line for the ridiculousness of my eligibility to inherit the Commerce Department Boston office on July 1st of 2004. And it is the same reason that the ownership of the Commerce Department Boston office can't be "picked up" by just writing it on any inheriting list, even if that inheriting list is affiliated to the famous rich Rockefellers. ----April 16th, 2019
I also heard a Rockefeller has illegally "announced" on the radio their own desire to spend my money on the radio in 2007's broadcasting. ----April 13th, 2019
可能也和2007年三次会议有关的 “04-12-2019 恐怖啊，以逼婚实施勒索的尝试”。----April 12th, 2019
Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies are listed at the bottom of this article. ----April 11th, 2019
I heard my big trouble with Rockefeller name started since July 1st of 2004 but not because of my huge several billion U.S. dollars inheriting-day spending. I heard it was because a Rockefeller's name affiliated somebody has "inherited" that publicly famous "O'Connor's confusion company" almost immediately after O'Connors, as well as that American company's six upstream investor-companies, objected "my inheriting" in ceremonially monotonous style. I heard the reason for Rockefeller's-affiliated "inheriting" is "it is just a picking up" but Rockefellers' insisting on to validate such ownership, according to a forged inheriting-list, have made it not funny at all.
*This American company has a famous "French Financier" investor-company. (updated on April 14th)
*This American company's current size is about $400Billion. (updated on 04/16/2019).
*I have complained to the law enforcing agency demanding clarification about O'Connor's confusion, and I heard O'Connor name did the same, I have changed my inherited-it-saying after I heard the clarification that this American company has been lawfully owned fully by its British Investor company for over 400 years. (updated on 04/17/2019).
I heard another big trouble with Rockefeller name was a 2007's radio broadcasting which announced my first year's American paying company is a "Rockefeller's taking over". This is the company has the rumored my birth children's inheritable story but such story never has rumored any child "supposedly" from the announced "taking-over" Rockefeller. I heard this taking-over announcement has some foreign department's stubborn associations is the reason for all those headaches to everyone who has not heard such a 2007's announcement.
*This American company has a Portugal investor company. (updated on April 14th)
*This American company's current size is about $400Billion as well. (updated on 04/16/2019).
I heard two other big troubles with Rockefeller name were both because of their in-law affiliation. One is my third year's paying American company, one is my fourth year's paying American company, which have added rumored Rockefellers' "taking over" four out of my five years' living expenses providing. The fifth year's paying American company is rumored "taken over" by a Russian name, I have not heard rumors about how this Russian name affiliated with the money, this rumored Russian name has never been affiliated with me. This is not funny at all when I am penniless.
*One of these two American companies is an investor-company of NYC's Javits center, the other one has been Lehman Brother's investor-company. (updated on April 14th)
*These two American companies' current sizes are about $400Billion each. (updated on 04/16/2019).
----April 10th, 2019
Added item "2-1: The anger if I am the reason for those confused families lost their "confused family wealth"? " on 04-09-2019.
Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion
It seems that the big name R has a shared family habit to announce their own speculation as if an authoritative statement is
I say it aloud again: My inheriting has my own inheritable and own inheriting administrative attorneys that absolutely & completely independent from any R's family wealth. My Trust-inheriting is irrelevant to any R's wealth.
----April 5th, 2019
Heard 2007's three meetings have been reasons for a lot of confusions. I heard there were three meetings in 2007 (January, June, and July respectively) intended to address some confusion regarding 2004's three meetings but resulted in broadcasting original confusion only.
June of 2007's meeting, I heard it was all about confusion if my 2004's inhering can be valid:
1: How can an inheriting without any identification verification?
- My inheriting day was June 30th of 2004, my inheriting related identification verification was January of 2004, I was not asked to present my photo identification was because I was presented with the attorney in my U.S. resident immigration application attorney's office where all my identification (photo ID and legal documentation) were in records.
2: How can anyone inherit a company when being objected at the inheriting moment already?
3: How can anyone inherit without public known inheritable nor public-known inheriting attorneys?
January of 2007's meeting, I heard the clarification included:
* non-staff means employed but not on the payroll, similar to college's honor professor, sit-in professor for the semester(s), faculty, staff, etc.
I heard anger illustrated in July of 2007's meeting was regarding why the Chinese government tolerated a nobody in the U.S. military's name to insult the Chinese government?
Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies:
I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
- On June 30th of 2004, I was being objected the eligibility to inherit several U.S. companies, but my 2004's inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was actually Trust-Inheriting which should not involve any specific business investment company so that those objections in 2004 to against me inheriting those companies were irrelevant to my Trust-Inheriting.
- All those companies, who expressed objection on June 30th of 2004 as mentioned above, have never been owned by any Rockefeller name, nor any Ford name, nor any Walton name. ( reference link of how to verify a company's lawful ownership --updated on 04-03-2019)
- It is rumored there were other inheriting events on the same day of June 30th of 2004 as well. All were irrelevant events because each had different wealth to be inherited and each had different inheriting administrative attorneys groups. Family inheriting normally administered by attorneys who are known to inheriting families. (--updated on 04-03-2019)
2-1: The anger if I am the reason for those confused families lost their "confused family wealth"? (--updated on 04-09-2019)
- The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to company registration historical records and commercial registration laws, those objecting companies are not part of the wealth of those confused families, which means those confused families historically never own those companies so that they never lost their "confused family wealth".
- The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to Trust laws, Trusted wealth is beneficiary owned wealth since the date of the establishment of the Trust, which means a company-ownership confusion is not the reason for anyone to "take over" such already owned Trusted wealth, which is also according to Trust laws.
- The efforts have been on clarifying that, those confused families did not lose any of their family wealth because of my birth nor because of my Trust-inheriting.
- My 2004's inheriting was a sole beneficiary person's Trust-Inheriting, my inheritable was some Trusts set up by some of my birth Chinese grandfathers, so no reading needed.
- My Inheriting attorneys are those Trusts' entrusting attorneys who have no reason to be known to the public because of the nature that my Trust-Inheriting is a private inheriting event.
- My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.
- Due to the private nature of inheriting, a signature is not the deciding factor in validating wealth inheriting after financial wealth's lawful ownership is already lawfully factually validly transferred.
- I entrusted my newly inherited wealth to June 30th of 2004's same entrusting attorneys' groups. I expressed my willingness to entrust my newly inherited Trusts on the same inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004.
- My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.
January of 2007's meeting, I heard the clarification included:
- 1: Eligibility for a veteran status is enlisted after a full year.
- 2: A researching non-staff military strategist only has commanding power when on assignment.
- 3: U.S. uniform personnel cannot be hostility to the United States nor the banking industry
* non-staff means employed but not on the payroll, similar to college's honor professor, sit-in professor for the semester(s), faculty, staff, etc.
I heard anger illustrated in July of 2007's meeting was regarding why the Chinese government tolerated a nobody in the U.S. military's name to insult the Chinese government?
- I did not attend July of 2007's meeting, I did not attend any of 2007's meetings.
- The rumored insulting was about what I said regarding the Chinese-Japanese war, and confusion was based on the fact that war was an invasion to China. I was only expressing my understanding about that war from the aspect of war strategy. The talk was never a deny regarding that war was an invasion to China.
- I am a birth child (possibly an heir) from the famous Chinese Emperors of Tang dynasty was acknowledged since 1989 by a lot of historians from a lot of Chinese colleges.
Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies:
I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
- The first year's settler was Tang dynasty's Emperor Xuanzong（唐玄宗李隆基), at about 1300 years ago. The known heir of the Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong(唐太宗李世民), both featured in those published paintings which were copies from the digital version of those original ancient family portraits.
- The second year's settler was painter Zhang, Guotao（国画大师张国焘), at about 800 years ago. He was a famous painter in China, one of whose paintings was discovered with the royal collection stamp that cost all his non-heir children been prosecuted by the Emperor of the Song dynasty. I heard this painter's private (royal) collection stamp is identified as the same or characteristically same to the royal collection stamps from the Chinese Tang dynasty and the Chinese Southern Tang dynasty.
- The third year's settler was Southern Tang dynasty's Emperor Yuanzong (南唐中主唐元宗李璟), and at about 1000 years ago.
- The fourth and fifth years' settlers were father and son. The father was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wenzong(唐文宗李昂) and the son was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wuzong(唐武宗李瀍), at about 1200 years ago. These two Emperors are historically known heir-grandsons of famous Chinese Tang dynasty's Emperor Taizong and Emperor Xuanzong.
03-29-2019 A challenge that I can only answer from who I am, a geek engineer and a jerk Princess
A lot of people don't realize attempting to stuck-on is an expression of desperation to be socially associated with. Is that means non-stuck-on-ers are the groups that don't care about the social association or because of never being threatened enough in their social life to be desperate?
To me, the first analytical approach would be why people associate with each other socially?
- For functional joint-affiliation biologically or marriage related families?
- For professional promotional opportunities?
- For life-changing adventure possibilities?
- For the joy of accompany-ship?
- For the alley-ship in challenging situations?
The further analysis would be on why some people turn into desperation to be a stuck-on if only felt being rejected by one or some of the above reasons? Or is that actually THE association that means all above to have such power? Or is that the only association a person can hope to be related to?
Next, my own curiosity would be a focus on if anybody can avoid such desperation if in such a situation that been set up and "ensured" to be rejected by all, such as, my current situation?
In my situation, as a lot of people have already heard, there have been so many no-association announcements for the purposes of: "don't ask if there are any intellectual incomes", "don't ask what has happened?", or "don't ask if there are any inherited money?", etc.
I heard there are more such no-association announced or about to be announced for the reason of "It is humiliating to be associated with such person...", and I heard such announcements have already started, began with five European Kingdoms, eight big names, and ten same-highschool marriages (five same junior-high schools, five same high schools).
So, for my own situation, the questions I would ask are:
- Who am I as "such person" in those announcements?
- Why? The necessities or reasons for such announcements, for circumstances or for objectives?
- What impacts would these announcements mean to me as a U.S. citizen?
Then, some immediate obvious would be:
- I say I am lucky to be a U.S. citizen who have such lawfully protected right.
- I say it is a definite not when such public announcing is already a definite must.
- I say I share the same question.
- I say I share the same curiosity.
- I say I take on as a social challenge I need to answer as a geek engineer.
- I say my concern is if I can roar as an Emperor instead of howling as a Princess.
----March 29th, 2019
03-28-2019 Marriage certificate represents the lawful ownership of human bodies, not the lawful ownership of any financial wealth.
The ownership of a land-lot is strictly regulated by property laws, the same as a commercial company's ownership. The Trust Registration Laws forbid taking over Trust's Wealth via updating Trust registration record. I have heard the confusion about the ownership of the land-lot and if I argued as such is too much, I say, being the sole beneficiary person "female palm" to Trusts that have been set up by some of my ancient birth grandfathers, I did argue as such to respond to some harassment.
---- March 28th, 2019
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is never lawfully owned by the husband nor by the husband's biological relative families. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱很可能根本从来就不是该丈夫的钱也根本从来就不是该丈夫血缘亲属关系的家族财产。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019
For the purpose of clarification:
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having?
- The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
- The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),
- The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size ($400 Million) is possibly from this company. (Rumored payments to Boston of Massachusetts are smaller amounts but can be checked similar to this)
- The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.
据说那几个南京四中毕业的婚姻，和我同一届初中毕业的就是4个，估计南京那边闹得天翻地覆的，和他们这几个是说中文和南京话的有关。要真是如此，实在莫明奇妙至极。钱是谁的，是由法律所规范的，结婚证书只是男女裸体的法律所有权证明，并不是财产的法律所有权证明。所有的争执都是关于，这钱那钱的，根本就不是她们男人家里或者她们男人家族里的钱。不需要他们举着个结婚证书满大街的证明他们才是拥有丈夫裸体的法律所有权的人。
----2019年3月28日。
据说“有个育姓老师的家属嫁了同一个人”的传言是汽车厂创立人的家属强调说明目前的几代子孙亲属关系内还没有一个华人妻子的原因。
----2019年3月28日。
信托继承和遗嘱继承都是依据逝者所立的遗嘱，区别在于：遗嘱继承是逝者生前依据自己意愿将其所有死后留下的全部财产以一份遗嘱或多份遗嘱方式予以安排。信托继承是：财产所有人生前将其特别指定的一部分财产转入信托，委托第三方照看，并立下意愿书指定这份财产应该归谁所有。一个信托的第一方第二方分别是指信托设立人和信托受益人。如果信托设立人在其意愿书里只指定了一个信托受益人，这个被指定的唯一的信托受益人就被称为该信托的唯一受益人。信托设立人的意愿书在信托设立人去世后即成为该信托财产的遗嘱。
----2019年3月28日
03-27-2019 My parents have been provided by my Chinese ancient paternal grandparents' blessing handsomely(我父母的费用是一直由我父系的华人祖爷爷们的祝福所支付的）
Heard about five related names married to five "the same high school".
I heard all from the same junior high school: Nanjing Fourth Middle School (都是南京第四中学的初高中毕业）. I heard these five names' marriages are the sworn protection to prevent me to sneak into "children's life", so, I have to declare I (Min Fang) refuse to gift blessing such marriage(s), permanently for the past, permanently for the present, and permanently for the future.
I heard these five marriages are also the reasons for a lot of negativeness about my parents' wish to be with me in the United States, so I (Min Fang) have to declare that my own biological lawful Chinese parents have been provided, $400Million a year each on healthcare, by my own biological lawful Chinese ancient paternal grandparents' blessing.
Since 2004, the above response has been the style for all similar financial concern related arguments, one more example:
Argument: The apartments were donated by the name,
Response: But the land-lot is owned by Chinese ancient grandpa's blessing.
For the purpose of clarification:
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is lawfully owned by the husband. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱根本就不是该丈夫的钱。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having?
- The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
- The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),
- The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size ($400 Million) is possibly from this company. (Rumored payments to Boston of Massachusetts are smaller amounts but can be checked similar to this)
- The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.
----March 27th, 2019
03-25-2019 If "prevention strategy" can prevent Mr. Peru Lu's money-desperation effectively? 以及·“1541年，一艘船的故事”
Heard some confusion in Chinese communities about the famous American company's ownership, I heard the confusion is from a marriage certificate owner.
I have to ask the question, is there anyone disagree that a marriage certificate represents the lawful ownership of a female' bare breasts or a male's joy of hiding in the depths of such bare breasts? Can I say if disputed is about some money's lawful ownership, should the confusion be related to a money ownership certificate?
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is lawfully owned by the husband. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说这钱那钱根本就不是丈夫的钱。）
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having?
- The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
- The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),
- The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size ($400 Million) is possibly from this company. (Rumored payments to Boston of Massachusetts are smaller amounts but can be checked similar to this)
- The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.
----March 26th, 2019
提到我究竟有没有钱，就不能不提华裔社区普遍奇怪为何我敢宣布我有钱就到处查询钱在哪里，华裔社区也普遍很奇怪为何法治国家的美国会允许我如此嚣张？我的回答：其实原因很简单，我继承财产的经历是真实的，我争执公司的所有权确实是有原因，争执另一方也是事出有因。所以，当时争执双方都是必须面对争执处理困扰，不管华裔社区如何对此难以置信如何表达对我方敏难以理解的愤怒，美国执法机构也一直都是在撇清究竟什么原因造成了困扰。
据说波城及其他地区的一些华裔对我不用做工挣生活费很反感，我本人对此也是投诉这根本是在进行仇恨犯罪。我本人难以理解的就是，既然美国各级政府相关机关机构都有其相应的专业工作人员在处理和我方敏有关的事宜的情况下，为何一些华人需要个别介入私人处理，并因此对我方敏在波城的生活制造困扰？
----2019年3月26日。
有些华裔社区的困扰是关于我对丁姓私人助理家人的态度为何与对美国欧家人的态度如此不同？我的回答：原因其实也很简单的。丁姓私人助理家人对我而言，丁姓一家就是扣留了我每月一万美金生活费用达二十九年的一家人，丁姓一家就是强奸了我奶奶却要我爷爷支付我奶奶子宫费的那个人的家人，丁姓一家就是以我父亲的弟弟所假冒的我爷爷签名而企图掠夺我父亲及我方敏财产的一家人。丁姓一家至今都还在到处宣传他们有一张我爷爷签名信，说是只要我父亲有钱就必须归他们所有，其实那是一张伪造签名的信件，我父亲也在1965年当时就已经向上海市的公安机关派出所报案了，而我方敏所继承的信托也都是我方敏自己拥有的合法财产。以上就是我所听说的丁姓私人助理相关的事件真相。有人很奇怪我为何如此冷静？我的回答是生活费是由那家汇款的美国公司在处理，我的法律权益已经由美国公司的律师在保护着，当年的生活困窘，我也是因我父母为我全心的付出而受惠，所以我本人对整个事件比较冷静。
至于美国的欧家人，我所知道的，欧家两代是在美国公司做法律总顾问的，从政后也一直支持美国公司的发展，在铁路建设发展后，还经常以参赞身份到访参访公司并过问指导公司的投资建设，对于美国公司的发展也都是实质上的贡献。虽然我和美国欧家一家就美国公司发生过争执，我一直尊敬也理应珍惜欧家对于美国公司发展所做的贡献，特别是在我的法律权益是被欧家所尊重的情况下，我对欧家因为一直参与公司经营决策所产生的困扰更是理应理解。
----2019年3月26日。
03-25-2019 If "prevention strategy" can prevent Mr. Peru Lu's money-desperation effectively?
Heard some talks about "If it is this person's money...", it is rumored a Mr. Peru Lu from the U.S. Justice Departement can grant such money.
I don't know if this is a true rumor and I don't know who is this Mr. Peru Lu other than he has been featured in some negative similar rumors. For the same reason as rumored famously effective "prevention strategy" from this Mr. Peru Lu, which means in case this Mr. Peru Lu would abuse my lawful income's lawful ownership and my lawful money's lawful spending-ship, I make this following announcement: I, Min Fang, refuse this Mr. Peru Lu's any attempt to grant any of my money.
In case anyone has not heard, this famously effective "prevention strategy" has been on the public media propaganda since 2014 or so, which has been to shit me all over and to trash my all over for over 4-5 years which was after I called law enforcement's help, in order to prevent me from attempting to stuck-on any rich or not-rich males, nor to be a career successful female professional. It is rumored all advised and forcefully pushed through by this Mr. Lu's associated. Now, after this 4-5 years shits-throwing, this Mr, Lu's associated must have felt so victory of "already can take-over the money to grant"? Is this any agasp really? possibly shocking really? My reaction to this is "I have been so, and so, and SO disgusted by this pig-born type money-desperation, so, I refuse any such attempt." Well, as long as this is for the realistic prevention purpose, it should be nothing wrong for me to make this paragraph and this article as it is. I have complained to the U.S. laws about possible sexual harassment and hate crime that conducted via the public media.
This prevention purpose is for the reason that it is rumored this "grant-money" started from a joke on July 1st of 2004 when everyone "doubts" whose money I was spending, I was asked how to split my wealth between my possible biological birth children. I was asked if I would be willing to give some money to the biological birth child(ren) from rumored possibly "willing Ford-father" and "willing Petraeus-father, I said of course if they ask. The "willing Ford-father" asked immediately, and the "willing Petraeus-father" said he would ask if he needs to. So, according to rumors, this "willing Petraeus-father" had answered someone a favor to link-pass this request has been the reason that I have been constantly requested for money, which I have refused all. Why shouldn't I? Of course, I should refuse. I have refused all, and I will refuse all in the future.
----March 25th, 2019
Following is the version of rumored ”1541's or 1547's ship or shipment“ story that I heard of. （据说下面故事不是上海于姓的而是上海育姓的。据说他们要求目前我所宣布的由五家美国公司指示支付的一年4亿我的生活费用给付，其中三年的给付必须因为这艘船的故事而归这个于（育）家所有。简直某明奇妙。上篇中的Mr. Peru Yu是相关的一个于（育）小姐的丈夫。）
---March 25th, 2019
有关上海丁姓私人助理的于家亲爹于家亲戚们。据说，是因为“1541年的一艘船故事”而认定那笔从1967年开始的每月汇款中国一万美金应该是他们家的钱，每月汇款的那家美国公司也应该归他们家所有。于家这种说法根本是无稽之谈，1541年的那船和于家一点关系都没有。
“1541年，一艘船的故事” （“1541's ship or shipment”）
我听说的，1541年的时候，有一家欧洲国家的公司雇佣了一家欧洲国家的船运公司将其从中国购入的一批货运回欧洲销售。其中的一个中国供货商和上海的这个于家关系不太好，于家不乐意看着那家中国供货商因为这笔生意大发利市，所以，就把船给扣了，一口咬定那船是他们于家的。当时争执的结果是于家给抓了，一家子给关在牢里了。现如今，经过了四百八十年，是480年呐，于家的后人坚持认为他们家当年（1541年）是冤枉的，他们家（1541年）当时是坐拥六十多万两银子的家当，那船真有可能是他们于家的。
我听说的，因为买货的这家欧洲公司是我所继承的信托一直有投资的一家公司，所以，于家认为那几家美国公司所支付给我的生活费用给付的钱统统都应该是他们于家的，把我给气的是上蹦下跳的。他们于家认为1541年当时那船是他们于家的，我所继承的信托所投资的是那家买货的欧洲公司，怎么也被他们于家划进他们于家去了？还捎带上其他根本就没买货的公司？
据说，我这愤怒一吼，上海那边的于家听到又气上了，说我根本是岂有此理呀，那船和货根本是一家的，说那是八国联军在入侵的时候，那船根本是只鸦片船，当时没给扣押成功，实在就是对不起那些深受鸦片之害的中国老百姓。我一听，这指控还了得，赶紧上网一查，中国的第一次鸦片冲突是在1800年，不是1541年，1541年的时候也还没有八国联军。这些于家后人估计也是历史没学好，和我一样，历史事件居然能如此上下求索的滑了两百多年，吓了我一大跳。
我又赶紧问啊，当时这船和货究竟怎么回事啊？据说，于家是一腔的愤怒说于家当时有着六十万两银子的身价，凭什么那不是他们于家的船；欧洲那家船运公司是不停的嘶嘶说那一船货的单程运费都已经一百万两银子了，妈妈的，那船本身至少是五千万两银子的身价（据说船价至少是每年运费的五十倍左右）。当时就因为这个价钱的差别，船员和于家的伙计打成了一团，中国当时的官府是直接就将于家上下抓入大牢。现在，这于家又“吵回来啦？”
听说，1541年的时候，一张单人单程船票去欧洲是一万两银子，历时需一年，那船是货船，货运规模是可装一千石粮食的重量，一石的运费是一千两银子到欧洲，所以，那艘船的一趟运费是1000 石*1000 两银子每石= 一百万两银子。
所以，1541年的那船和那货真的都不是上海于家的，那家美国公司支付给我的的生活费用给付是我的。
----2019年3月23日撰写，3月24日更新。
听说了一些针对我以下这篇博文的疑问，如果我父亲方文海很坚强，为何不能长期坚守？
我的回答：是你自己在怀疑我父亲方文海是否坚强吗？那你自己可以在那个地处沙漠无人区，一年有超过半年是深埋在地下的狭小环境里独自一人坚守三年吗？如果你自己已经知道了你自己不可能，你也就已经知道了你自己不可能和我父亲比坚强，你就应该已经知道了我父亲方文海的坚强是真实，是事实。那种艰苦的工作环境不光是我爸爸一个人所需要面对的，而是所有的勘探兵都有可能面对的工作环境，我父亲他们几个能够坚守三年的，都是陆军勘探兵，所以是陆军勘探兵的坚强。（---- 2019年3月24日）
03-24-2019 我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强
我方敏和我父亲方文海，似乎很明显是被华裔社区及中华人民共和国所摒弃的。很多华人甚至表态，如果我方敏和我的父亲方文海确实是唐太宗李世民的继承人，哪里会这么惨？就算是我方敏有居额的信托财产且与个别人有一些私人矛盾， 就算我方敏在美国的傲人成就是否真实被普遍怀疑着，但我父亲方文海在有着十三亿人民的中华人民共和国的处境为何会如此凄凉？
我不知确切答案，我也在探寻答案。普通的国人确实难以核实我和我父亲是否是一千四百年前的唐太宗李世民的继承人，但为何我父亲方文海作为一介普通中华人民共和国公民的基本法律权益都没有了？为何十三亿国人对我八十多岁的老父亲方文海所表达的或愤怒或冷漠，似乎都是在表达我父亲方文海就是应该人人见而诛杀的？我父亲方文海作为一个从不热衷社交生活且已退休多年的的南京紫金山天文台的一个天文学家，为何应该被十三亿人民理解成是中华人民共和国的一个敌人？
我听说这和我父亲以前的从军经历有关。我父亲十八岁就入伍当兵，是中国人民解放军陆军的一个勘探兵。从军五年，却是终身不得享受退伍军人待遇，军龄不算做工龄，就是因为当年的一个“开除军籍”的处分。广播剧曾经对此有过报道，但我听说有很多非勘探兵的现役和退伍军人都没听懂，不知道那是部队对于我父亲他们几个人最合适的安排和最安全的保护。很多有过从军经历的人都认为那是很严重的处分，我听说有很多人甚至认为中国方面对我父亲的态度其实是在执行军事法庭当年的处罚。
以下是我方敏作为我父亲方文海的女儿依据对我父亲方文海的了解和理解所做的解释博文。
我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强
前言：
我听说的是，那个观测站一年有七个月是深埋在厚沙下面，只有通气口，没有任何日光也没有电，观测站除了观测设施，没有任何其他物品也没有多余空间，只能容纳一人。广播剧所报道的几个人当时都是已经连续三年单人驻扎如此恶劣环境，全部都已经有了心理已经难以承受如此环境的临床心理症状。
我也听说了是当年那个长官的家属在过去几年里到处放话说我父亲他们几个当年造成影响实在是恶劣以制造公众对我父亲的敌意，轻视和仇恨。我也听说了，当年的事情后续经过是，那个长官只在那个恶劣岗位服役一年，就因自杀未遂原因，以这种根本就是逃避兵役方式离开的部队并保留了所有退伍军人待遇，而因为那个长官不负责任的行为所造成的恶劣后果是，我父亲他们几个作为那个长官的下属，个个都是在艰苦环境服役经年，离开时都是因公造成的心伤累累却终身没有任何退伍军人福利。
----2019年3月21日撰写，3月23日更新。
我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分 (摘自：11-12-2018 和我父亲有关的 ---- 我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分 )
我父亲在中国军队服役五年，包括在沙漠无人区观测站一个人驻扎整整三年，却是被开除军籍离开中国人民解放军的。我父亲究竟做了什么违反军纪的事情，会导致如此严重处分？我听说当时是因为我父亲违抗军令拒绝再在同一个沙漠观测站再待三年。
那个观测站就位于著名的科学家彭家木1980年6月失踪的沙漠地区，本应是一个任命为期一年的无人区观测站。我父亲是第一个奉令驻扎三年的军人，他被同一个长官命令再在同一个观察站驻扎三年是我父亲拒绝执行该军令的原因。当年的军事法庭裁决是我父亲因不执行军令被开除军籍，他的长官自己进该沙漠无人区观察站驻扎三年。
我听说我父亲的整个上级领导单位里，只有这个顶头上司从未有过奉令驻守沙漠观察站或者类似的沙漠无人区工作经验，是整个事件及处理意见的原因。
那个观测站位于沙漠无人区内，没人可以在步行三天后还能存活。我听说我父亲的长官是在一年以后被调离该观察站。我听说自从我父亲的长官被调离后，那个观测站被调整成了小组观测站。我听说这是八年多以前我父亲从军经历首次播出时的故事，但好像是很多没当过兵的普通老百姓统统都没听懂的故事。
为什么我父亲从未抱怨军事法庭的如此裁决对我父亲是否公平？我估计，我父亲可能是认为这个裁决一下来，就没人可以让他再留在军队里，再给他类似的工作安排。我父亲当时是观测兵，属部队培训的技术兵种，至少需服役五年，但可延长至20年。服役期间如想离开部队需申请转业，转业申请如不批准就不得离开部队，直到20年的最高服役期满。
----Nov. 12th, 2018
以上摘自：11-12-2018 和我父亲有关的 ---- 我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分
----2019年3月24日。
我听说的是，那个观测站一年有七个月是深埋在厚沙下面，只有通气口，没有任何日光也没有电，观测站除了观测设施，没有任何其他物品也没有多余空间，只能容纳一人。广播剧所报道的几个人当时都是已经连续三年单人驻扎如此恶劣环境，全部都已经有了心理已经难以承受如此环境的临床心理症状。
我也听说了是当年那个长官的家属在过去几年里到处放话说我父亲他们几个当年造成影响实在是恶劣以制造公众对我父亲的敌意，轻视和仇恨。我也听说了，当年的事情后续经过是，那个长官只在那个恶劣岗位服役一年，就因自杀未遂原因，以这种根本就是逃避兵役方式离开的部队并保留了所有退伍军人待遇，而因为那个长官不负责任的行为所造成的恶劣后果是，我父亲他们几个作为那个长官的下属，个个都是在艰苦环境服役经年，离开时都是因公造成的心伤累累却终身没有任何退伍军人福利。
----2019年3月21日撰写，3月23日更新。
我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分 (摘自：11-12-2018 和我父亲有关的 ---- 我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分 )
我父亲在中国军队服役五年，包括在沙漠无人区观测站一个人驻扎整整三年，却是被开除军籍离开中国人民解放军的。我父亲究竟做了什么违反军纪的事情，会导致如此严重处分？我听说当时是因为我父亲违抗军令拒绝再在同一个沙漠观测站再待三年。
那个观测站就位于著名的科学家彭家木1980年6月失踪的沙漠地区，本应是一个任命为期一年的无人区观测站。我父亲是第一个奉令驻扎三年的军人，他被同一个长官命令再在同一个观察站驻扎三年是我父亲拒绝执行该军令的原因。当年的军事法庭裁决是我父亲因不执行军令被开除军籍，他的长官自己进该沙漠无人区观察站驻扎三年。
我听说我父亲的整个上级领导单位里，只有这个顶头上司从未有过奉令驻守沙漠观察站或者类似的沙漠无人区工作经验，是整个事件及处理意见的原因。
那个观测站位于沙漠无人区内，没人可以在步行三天后还能存活。我听说我父亲的长官是在一年以后被调离该观察站。我听说自从我父亲的长官被调离后，那个观测站被调整成了小组观测站。我听说这是八年多以前我父亲从军经历首次播出时的故事，但好像是很多没当过兵的普通老百姓统统都没听懂的故事。
为什么我父亲从未抱怨军事法庭的如此裁决对我父亲是否公平？我估计，我父亲可能是认为这个裁决一下来，就没人可以让他再留在军队里，再给他类似的工作安排。我父亲当时是观测兵，属部队培训的技术兵种，至少需服役五年，但可延长至20年。服役期间如想离开部队需申请转业，转业申请如不批准就不得离开部队，直到20年的最高服役期满。
----Nov. 12th, 2018
以上摘自：11-12-2018 和我父亲有关的 ---- 我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分
----2019年3月24日。
03-22-2019 我的2004年苏州建议和江苏省的2001年苏州规划
前序：
很明显，和江苏的矛盾，也就是需要撇清一下，究竟对苏州发展的贡献是什么？是谁的贡献？没什么特别的。
我是在外自己创业自己立业的，和南京同父同母的区别就是这点。也就是俗称的，什么是真的有本事。我和南京同父同母的最大矛盾就是我父母在南京的遭遇。南京那边最骄傲的本事就是不声不响就能把爸爸妈妈的东西全部抢到手，非常骄傲，估计如果他们再能把我的智慧专利想办法偷点，他们更是觉得他们自己很了不起。我是打心眼里瞧不起所有那些帮着他们如此”能干“就为帮助他们可以独自倾吞我父母毕生积蓄而特意向我隐瞒我父亲消息，完全无视我八十多岁老父亲2013年当时凄凉处境的那群南京师范大学附属中学及南京第四中学毕业的所谓“能人”。我和中国政府一些人的矛盾也是类似。
自信拥有一身的本事，是否白手就应该可以创业，就应该可以施展身手；还是必须有现成的大企业大办公室，才能证明拥有经营企业的才华，这一直是很多人的纠结。在很多优秀的企事业管理人才中，很多也会从大学毕业一开始就选择在大公司学习经营管理，而不是自己辛苦创业。其实，这就像电脑行业里选择做个网络管理员或者软件程序员一样，各有各的爱好，我认为也应该都是，”如果环境真的没有可能选择，两者应该都能做的情况“才是真的有本事。
我和美国这边的有钱人老婆的矛盾，也是类似。不过，这不是我一个人和某一个特定富家老婆的矛盾，而是富家女儿和富家媳妇普遍的矛盾。富家女儿从小的家教就是尊重企业的经营管理是一项特殊技能，富家媳妇认为她们自己能嫁入豪门就已经证明了才华出众，不可能不懂经营，作为投资人家里的媳妇，企业必须尊重她们的出众才华，企业必须被她们指手画脚。美国这边的企业，包括广播剧广播公司，被几个富家媳妇搅的是天翻地覆。我是因为自己的亲身遭遇公开痛骂中国政府根本就是娼妓婊子院。
（富家子女和富家伴侣的区别，就是富家子女都有需要证明自己能力的压力，而富家伴侣通常认为豪门婚姻就已经证明了自己的实力。----2019年3月24日）
----2019年3月22日的一篇博文，2019年3月23日改写。
我的2004年苏州建议和江苏省的2001年苏州规划
南京方面其他的矛盾，其实是和江苏的矛盾，也就是苏州能够享受中央政府的类似深圳政策，是否和我有关。
符合参与智慧专利评估资格的三个基本要素一般是1）机构单位有收到某人的智慧创意，2）机构单位认为该智慧创意会对该机构单位有贡献，3）该机构单位因为采用了该智慧创意而获益。在该智慧创意是对该机构单位的获益有贡献的情况下，智慧专利评估的初审就是界定什么是该人自己独立的贡献，什么是他人已经独立做出的贡献。---摘自 2019年3月22日一篇博文
我是在2004年6月的一个星期天去上医大同班的黄莉家里时，谈到我对苏州的欣赏的，就是我做奥运会创意的同一天。
我因为在上海待过五年，听到的都是上海人要定制衣服做点东西，就去苏州；要住，就去嘉兴。苏州做出来的东西拿出来就是满意，退休了能住在嘉兴就蛮好的。我在小说报纸杂志上看到的，也都是苏州自上海建埠以后，就一直是上海富人的精致品供货商，这也是苏州的绣娘一直很有名的一个重要原因。我对此的文绉绉的理解就是：苏州加工是能够体现上海设计的精髓的。
还有，上海人不会担心孩子在苏州接受教育是否会影响教育质量，因为自古苏州的私塾就很好；苏州的衣食住行，上海人都觉得挺合口味，苏州虽小，但样样物件都有苏州自己打出的的名号。我对此的文绉绉的理解就是：苏州有自己的文化底蕴，好东西随手可点但都在深巷里藏着，且都是小规模作坊式经营。
所以，那天我提到深圳就是因为中央政府的优惠政策，以密集人力劳动型代客加工为经济发展的驱动力发展起来的，如果中央政府也能给苏州这样的优惠政策，苏州作为上海设计的加工基地，再加上苏州自己的文化底蕴，以这两者作为苏州经济发展的驱动力，苏州一定是可以向深圳一样迅速发展起来的。
所谓的深圳政策，就是政府区划留在江苏，享受中央政府的贷款和税收优惠，也就是地方税收是交给江苏省的，而不像上海那样归省级的上海市自己留用。这样，江苏省政府一定是会支持的。我毕竟是南京长大的人，胳膊肘子弯一弯，要是完全不想到点南京，非得被江苏省的省会城市南京痛骂不可。这也算是捎带上了南京福利。
听说江苏省对我的愤怒，就是苏州发展计划是江苏省2001年就已经提出的，依托苏州的传统代客加工也是在该计划里就提出的，2006-2007年苏州发展计划被中央批准，享受深圳待遇。为何这却被说成是我的贡献？
我也问了一下，如今苏州发展已经是事实了，当年矛盾的真相究竟是什么？我就说我听到的。
我的贡献就是对于苏州传统加工工业的欣赏性理解。做个比喻，就是有个人很会做菜，这是我和江苏省的共识。江苏省认为中央应该大笔拨款，让这个人的做菜才华可以有施展的空间；我方敏认为这人可以自己凭借自己烧菜的才华，自己挣个钵满盆满丰厚的未来，只要能够享受贷款优惠税收优惠，方便企业经营的资金需求，这人就可以大展鹏图。
据说中央政府当年听到的建议是：江苏省的2001年苏州发展计划：没有经济发展的驱动力，只有苏州的城市发展规划和大笔资金的需求；我的2004年苏州建议：不要钱，有经济发展的驱动力，就只要求少交点税钱就可以了。
我还不清楚的是，中国政府是否有收到我对苏州发展的建议。同一天的奥运创意，我是已经通过2008年的北京奥运会很确定中国政府有收到我的奥运创意，90%以上是我那天的创意。
---- 2019年3月22日。
03-16-2019 Prenup was never a desired but a comprised fundamentals for all discussion participants on July 1st of 2004
Heard some confusion about prenup based marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004.
My-side financial status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I: Why I say those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth?
Those payments-instructor American companies have been operating on North America soil for over 400 years, which means these companies have been investing on North America soil since the year of 1600, which was at about the same time when the most famous British East India company (1600) was first established or the famous boat of "May Flower"(1620) time, this was over 200 years before the famous America Staking (Land Run) time (1800-1850). I heard the land price at the Land Rush(1800-1850) time was about a Guinea per acre, never free but affordable was the reason for the era to be referred as Land-Run time, but land-payments paid to the Federal government had caused huge tension between local Indians and the U.S. federal government.
I heard Rockefellers started to invest in North America at Gold Rush time (1800-1850), Ford wealth started from 1900's Ford Motor. ((Heard it was corrected that both names started investing (buying land) in North American after year of 1700. That is still at least a huge one-hundred years’ time in difference. ----March 18th, 2019)
So, I say those payments-instructor American companies have never been owned by any Rockefeller nor by any Ford, and those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth.
----March 15th, 2019
II: A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws
If any of your friends have a concern that those companies I have claimed may have been owned by your friend's family-name, and the anxiety is somehow the company insist on to provide me money as I requested, I personally think the best way for a friend to do is to verify the company's lawful ownership according to the commercial company's registration law, which is similar to the motor vehicle's registration title or the property certificate, then ...
In my personal opinion, if the company is lawfully owned by your friend's family name, the matter can certainly be resolved according to laws, even if the confusion only has impacted your friend's family name, not to mention the anxiety of watching me receiving money from the company by just announcing "I have this money" on the internet. (updated on March 16th, 2019)
----March 3rd, 2019
III: How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? (March 16, 2019)
According to laws, the commercial registration certificate(license) needs to be displayed at the operating facility of the company so that its legal ownership may not be printed on the certificate:
----March 3rd, 2019
III: How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? (March 16, 2019)
According to laws, the commercial registration certificate(license) needs to be displayed at the operating facility of the company so that its legal ownership may not be printed on the certificate:
- The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD,
- The asset size of the company at the time the company was established.
- The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),
- The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size is possibly from the same company.
If a company registration certificate can pass all above screening check, then, check the registration certificate's title sequential number on that registration certificate which is helpful to identify the ownership information from the registration-certificate issuer government agency. (----March 16th, 2019)
Reference about commercial company's registration:
----March 3rd, 2019
My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.
The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.
What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.
Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).
How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.
----March 16th, 2019
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,
If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.
----March 17th, 2019
03-15-2019 上海南京方面的愤怒，执法界的闪烁言辞，我的解释和一些道听途说
Why I say those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth?
Those payments-instructor American companies have been operating on North America soil for over 400 years, which means these companies have been investing since 1600 which was at about the same time when the most famous British East India company was first established or the famous boat of "May Flower" time, this was over 200 years before the famous America Staking (Land Run) time. I heard the land price at the Land Rush time was about a Guinea per acre, never free but affordable was the reason for the era to be referred as Land-Run time, but land-payments paid to the Federal government had caused huge tension between local Indians and the U.S. federal government.
I heard Rockefellers started to invest in North America at Gold Rush time (1800-1850), Ford wealth started from 1900's Ford Motor.
So, I say those payments-instructor American companies have never been owned by any Rockefeller nor by any Ford, and those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth.
----March 15th, 2019
南京师范大学附属中学校友及南京第四中学校友的愤怒：
1：凭什么说我是南京师范大学附属中学的骄傲？他们自己才是。
- 我的回答是：作为南京师范大学附属中学的骄傲应该是什么什么条件，我和他们自己之间的区别是什么？
- 在我对南师大附中的学习方法改进所作的贡献是已知真实的情况下，为什么我被作为南师大附中的骄傲就是他们这些南京师范大学附属中学校友的耻辱愤怒？
- 我听说的，我的生活费用给付的美国给付签字公司（payment Instructing companies）都是在北美土地上营运了400多年的一些公司，也就是他们是在美国历史上著名的”跑马圈地“时期还要早一百年就已经在美国投资，是和英国著名的有武装力量的那个东印度公司成立（1600年）的同时期开始在北美开始投资的，差不多是著名的1621年的美国“五月花号”移民的时间。北美历史上的跑马圈地时期是指北美的土地价格还很便宜的时期，从来不是不用付钱就可以得到北美土地的。
- 据说洛克菲勒家是在淘金热时期（1850年）开始在北美投资的，洛克菲勒家在北美的投资历史比我的生活费用给付的美国给付签字公司在北美的投资历史要少了（晚了）至少两百五十年左右，从来不是一个财富，只有1860年以后的合作投资关系。福特财富起家的福特汽车是在1900年的事情了。。(据说两家都公开纠正各自在北美的投资（买地）是从1700年以后就开始了，但那也是和我所宣布的公司在北美开始投资的时间差了至少一百年的时间了，不是什么很短的时间。通过公司的工商登记资料也是很容易查出公司的合法投资者拥有者。----2019年3月18日更新）
- 所以，我说由这些美国给付签字公司授权的我的生活费用给付从来不是福特家的钱，也从来不是洛克菲勒家的钱。
听说了一些就香港2004年汇到美国的五亿美金款项的一些争议。
1：我听说的：香港2004年汇出的五亿目前以丁姓私人助理家人名义扣留在上海，是美国的Peru Lu按照上海法院的判决并无视美国香港方面对此判决的争议而将该款项汇往上海的，Peru Lu是上海丁姓私人助理的亲生父亲的一个五等亲戚的婚姻丈夫孩子父亲。
2：我听说的：上海法院的判决法官是方智仁一女的孩子的中学同班同学。据说上海法院判决这笔款项是根据方智仁1964-1965年的一纸签名：“如果方文海”竟敢”还有钱，每一分钱都必须归丁姓私人助理或其家人所有“。据说这纸1964-1965年的签名信是由当时年仅二十四岁左右的我父亲的弟弟以我爷爷方智仁的名义签署的，而我父亲的弟弟是听我爷爷告知我父亲说给我父亲的钱存在了香港而获悉香港可能有我爷爷给我父亲的钱的。
我方敏对此的回应是：
首先，香港2004年汇出的五亿是由香港的一个信托所支付的，该付款信托从来都是我爷爷方智仁在1948年就已经直接给了我方敏（方文海所生的女掌）的钱，不是我父亲方文海的钱，我的这份回应是依据我所知道的中国人民共和国信托法及欧美国家的信托法对于信托的定义。（索引：中华人民共和国信托法， 欧美有关信托的法律知识， 也可上网查询“property law" 或者”Trusts.”）
其次，我父亲1965年已经年满三十三岁了，是中华人民共和国法律上界定的独立法律行为责任人，如果该1964-1965年的签名信是由我父亲的弟弟所写这个信息属实，那么，依据中华人民共和国的法律，我父亲方文海的弟弟是根本无权以我爷爷方智仁的名义在1964-1965年擅自掠夺我父亲方文海的财产。
----方敏（2019年3月15日）。
为何我不肯在2004当时就送出我自己愿意的这份五亿美金的礼物？
爸爸妈妈：。。。上海方面因为大娘娘的·去世，一直很愤怒，怪我为什么2004年的时候就是不肯给。很简单，当时我是身体很不好，就只有5分钟记忆力，我自己都帮不了我自己，你和妈妈我更帮不了，我自己的身体难以承受环境突变所带来的心理及环境压力，如果我给你们，你们肯定没好果子吃。如果我给他们不给你们，他们是一定会想查出个水落石出，究竟钱是不是就是确定只给我一个人的，我本人当时完全没有记忆力，根本弄不清，又不能保护你们，他们要是又有经济实力，我们三个会是很惨很惨的。所以我坚持一定要等我拿到钱的时候一起给。他们要查是他们的事，我就是不会因为好心想送礼而已就把自己弄到很惨很惨。2015年以后就不是我在拖延了，我也只能是安慰安慰他们，先注意身体，这钱是从2015-2016年就开始有传言在飞来飞去，现在的传说也还是在飞，着急了，也就是自己得高血压，我是从2015年1月就报警了。（摘自我2019年2月16日的一篇博文）
回望过去这些年，事实是：我父母的遭遇已经很吓人了，我想送礼的那几个要么没参与或者参与的很有限。
据说我父母一直很气愤我没有通知他们我继承财产这件事，否则他们对可能的危险会有点防范意识。我本人当时身体不好只有五分钟的记忆是真实，2004年6月30日当天离开律师办公室的时候我就已经完全不记得了，2004年7月1日那天也是。我相信我父母还在，我相信我自己能被保护着，那些保护我的人就会在乎尊重我托付他们照顾保护我父母的意愿。
希望上海南京方面一切安全。
----2019年3月15日。
中美政府的司法执法部门为何对我继承财产说法颇多闪烁？
我听说的：据说中国的外交政策就是利用不懂什么是信托继承为借口从国外拿钱，而这些国外的钱都是外国公司在国外（即非中华人民共和国的领土上）做生意忙生产赚来的，所以对中国公安部司法部在”是否是继承之争，是否专利收入之争，还是在偷钱洗钱”事件中的角色究竟是国际刑事合作组织的一部分还是中国”拿钱来“外交政策中为偷钱抢钱探寻银行账号的协作成员部门一直争议很大。
据说美国这边矛盾也很多，美国找工作又容易，只要应聘报纸广告上的一份工作就可以成为美国的政府干部了。听说美国政府执法界的争议，除了工作中的细节处理，主要的争议有，
- 1）是否我的一些信托已经其实归属美国政府所有了（按照美国的信托登级法，没有任何可能。美国法律禁止通过更改信托登记在未经财产主人的授权的情况下就擅自更换财产的法律所有权），
- 2）这些美国公司给我的钱财是否都是合法给付即是否是事实上我继承了我爷爷们给我设立的信托及我是否确实是这些信托的唯一受益人（按照我听说的，依据美国付款公司的各级投资公司（美国付款公司上溯六百年之内的投资链）的证词及相关六个国家司法部门的相关辅助证明，我是美国付款公司的投资信托的唯一受益人；同时，按照美国的税收法，我符合缴纳投资人收入税。）
----2019年3月15日
03-14-2019 医学上的假死状态，山东的王家，爸爸的遭遇
听到华裔社区一些愤怒。他们很气是因为，有关各方都已经证明爸爸妈妈必死无疑了，我为什么还坚持说爸爸妈妈活着。我是我父母的女儿，我在乎的是我父母好不好，所以，听到我的耳朵里，那些传言都是在说不准我父母活；很多人很气是他们有些没听明白，我也只能说如果他们没有那种王博贤，方文海都是死绝了才好的心态，再重新听听这些传言，可能就和我听到的一样了，”如果王博贤是因为医学上的假死状态被送了进去，怎么好像就是铁了心的不准王博贤有任何逃生的机会啊？究竟是谁恨王博贤恨成这样啊？她是没有钱也没有任何可能继承财产的一个？” (----摘自2019年3月13日的一篇博文)
医学上的假死状态：类似众人所熟知的昏迷。在某些心理病理原因的刺激下，人的大脑意识认知区域会出现极度休克状态，造成失去知觉的现象，这是人类的主观神经受到刺激所致，而植物神经的极度休克状态就是医学上的假死状态，也就是没有了可检测的生命指标。
----2019年3月14日。
我的犹豫：很希望尽快和爸爸妈妈团圆，但很担心在谁恨你们如此还没有查清楚的情况下，即使我已经报警，也还是担心暴露你们会威胁你们的安全。我也还是坚持认为你们必须在公众场合出现，因为我常听到的说法，策略是在各个击破及蒙在鼓里解决。钱一定要扣紧。
----2019年3月14日。
爸爸妈妈：我说我听说的，你们自己小心：
山东王家：妈妈王博贤有10个兄弟姊妹，7个是一个模子出来的漂亮，但既不像他们的爸爸，也不像他们的妈妈。据说这是山东王家认为他们这7个是杂种的原因。
我的回答：听说是因为他们像他们的爸爸的妈妈（奶奶），是典型的河南漂亮，不像他们爷爷的山东模样，不像他们妈妈的山东漂亮，也不像他们爸爸王怀迎自己的河南山东混血后的河北长相，所以做爸爸的王怀迎看着他们一直很开心，从不认为他们不是他自己的孩子。
对妈妈的恨：有一部分可能和方智仁爷爷的遗嘱有关。爷爷替我在香港设立的信托遗嘱说的是，钱是给方文海的女掌一个人的。大陆很多人在2004年以后可能听说了，但不明白女掌是什么意思，以为是妻子角色，所以妈妈很惨。
现在已经清楚了，爷爷方智仁遗嘱中所说的女掌是我方敏（爷爷的家族胎记掌纹孙女）。我在国外一直很安全，就因为国外的都很清楚，只有我活着，才会有信托每年所支付的生活费用给付。所以，国外的恶意传言都是，让我得癌，让我没有日子过。
----2019年3月14日。
爸爸的遭遇：1）我一直说我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，爸爸在激愤的时候，也因为他自己的胎记掌纹说他自己是唐太宗李世民的继承人，因为国内的很多各种传言，所以让国内的大众很气愤。2）国内不熟悉什么是信托继承，认定我是偷了爸爸的应继承财产但爸爸并不介意，所以只要爸爸不挡道了，我就没有可能拿到钱了。
我的回答：
1）：我因为是在国外生活，广播剧的国外华人非华人听众很多都是生活在法制国家里，很清楚广播剧的美国制作的法律思维逻辑，普遍很认同我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，所以我在国外一点压力都没有。（看附注，摘自：02-26-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （16）-- 南师大附中，广播剧矛盾，及唐太宗李世民的继承人）
中国国内对方文海作为我爸爸当然也是唐太宗李世民继承人的这个事实的这种愤怒态度，我方敏的回应是：我父亲方文海也是有家族胎记掌纹的，他从未因此而向中国政府要求政治上的认同，也没有要求中国政府及江苏省政府的财政特别拨款作为家庭经济来源，为何民间对于我父亲方文海是否是唐太宗李世民继承人的怀疑及不认同，会对方文海的人生财产安全造成如此威胁，实在难以理解。
2）：法律上的信托继承，是指我是继承了爷爷方智仁直接指定并在1948年就已经直接给了我的钱。所以，我没有偷爸爸的钱，也从来不是爸爸不介意别人偷了他的钱。
----2019年3月14日。
附注：
广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍：
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民是东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人，而很多不熟悉没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。
如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。
----2019年2月26日，2019年2月27日更新。
03-09-2019 Why I was accepted so immediately by the wealthy community in 2004's meetings? （2004年开会时那些有钱人怎么那么轻易的就接纳了我?)
I heard about some confusion regarding my current situation.
1: Exactly, what has been the issue between me and some persons I met.
My answer: The real issue has been who owns the company that paid my living expenses to Boston of Massachusetts. (--updated on March 13th)
Saying from same high school and Chinese communities, the living expenses paid to Boston of Massachusetts are paid by a husband whose most beloved wife not willing to let me receive. These some persons and Chinese communities are helping the wife to ensure I don't ever receive any such money.
Saying from the paying-instructor American company, the living expenses paid to Boston of Massachusetts are paid by the company according to its known lawful investor's instruction, and I am the person qualify to pay investor's income taxes for those payments.
Saying from myself, The paying-instructor American company is a company that my inherited Trust has been investing, I am an investor of the paying-instructor American company.
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? (March 16, 2019)
According to laws, the commercial registration certificate(license) needs to be displayed at the operating facility of the company so that its legal ownership may not be printed on the certificate:
- The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD,
- The asset size of the company at the time the company was established.
- The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),
- The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size is possibly from the same company.
If a company registration certificate can pass all above screening check, then, check the registration certificate's title sequential number on that registration certificate which is helpful to identify the ownership information from the registration-certificate issuer government agency. (----March 16th, 2019)
03-03-2019 A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws
----March 9th, 2019
2: Some anger related to why I so comfortably calling people Uncles in 2004.
My answer: I heard the anger about 2004's meeting is regarding why I was so easily take-in by the wealthy community that I was not part of, at least, not as a newly inherited.
I am a beneficiary person of Trusts that my grandfathers set up for me, all set up abroad before China's 1949-liberation. I grew up in China but I had been taken good care of, I grew up with the rich experiences that my frustration can be smoothed even if my parents don't listen to my complaints, but I couldn't identify who are the smoothing group.
That 2004 meetings, on June 30th and July 1st, were the meetings that I felt like I was brought to a parents-alike group's affiliated-company-party that I was known to them even though I don't know anyone and they don't really know my parents, I felt its so very natural to call anyone Uncle or Untie if they are over 10 years older than me and treated me as a young girl, especially when my requests for all those "I want..." were answered with obvious smiles. Now I know most of the participants are from my grandfathers' Trusts related groups, I was introduced to them as the little girl of my grandfathers'.
My achievements in computer-research related are all real, that my in-depth understanding about the matters, in those casual chats with me about investments as the newly inherited, was the reason for those chats stayed as business work-centric discussions instead of drifting to social talks. I think this "listen to me seriously" is the reason-impression that I was fully take-in as a part of.
There are rumors if I am a threat to the United States has been the reason that I deserved to be smashed in order to protect the United States, I have been wondering why so when I am a U.S. citizen and a "self-claimed" investor to a lot of American companies who have being obviously very protective to my own money that I thought I have hard-earned the reputation of not-willing to give out any at all?
----March 9th, 2019
很多的愤怒是关于外国有钱人怎么那么容易就接纳了我，把我当自己人，是因为我喜欢叫叔叔讨好他们吗？其实，我的经历是一个典型的信托受益人的经历，我是我爷爷们替我设立的信托的受益人，信托都是在1949年解放前就已经设在国外的。我是在国内长大，但我从小就知道既使我爸爸妈妈不管，我的投诉是有人管的有人听的，就是不知这些人是谁。2004年6月30日和7月1日这两天，我的感觉是虽然我不认识任何人，但我是在一个类似和我的家长工作相关的一个公司的工作联谊场合，虽然他们也并不认识我的家长，但他们都知道我是谁家孩子，我自己觉得我把一些比我大了十岁以上又把我当小孩子看的人称呼为叔叔阿姨是很自然的，特别是他们都是笑眯眯地听我说我那一堆小女孩的“我想要这个，我想要那个"。现在我知道很多参与会议的都是我爷爷们替我设立的信托的相关人士，我是作为我爷爷们的小孙女介绍给他们的。
同时，我自己在电脑软件研究方面的成就都是真实，作为刚刚继承信托财产的受益人，我对他们礼貌问询对信托投资有何看法的相关谈话内容的充分理解和认知，是这些闲聊成为工作探讨而非社交闲谈的原因。我认为他们”很认真听我说话“是大众觉得我被富裕阶层充分接纳的界定印象。
----2019年3月9日。
爸爸妈妈：
如果方姓人士通过一些方式联络询问，就让他们自己看我的博客，自己找律师解疑释惑，亲兄弟明算账，他们既然认为他们是在捍卫他们自己的合法权益，就让他们自己找法律问讯清楚，比较合适。我没有隐瞒我爸爸还有一子，我爸爸有三个弟妹，也没隐瞒我爷爷有一弟一妹。我所知道的所有相关继承的资讯也都在那个博客上了，从未隐瞒。我是已经将我的博客在2015年就特别通知了南京，2018年也问了上海是否要我博客地址。
全世界各地，懂中文英语的，也都可以看懂我的那个博客，没什么需要特别谈的，他们是一腔愤怒，好像我偷了藏了他们的钱，我也是一腔愤怒，没兴趣看他们的老脸拖着老长，不愿意他们一副上门就是该砸该跺的气势，更不愿意自己家里被他们直接上门打砸抢。
美国政府，美国法律，中国政府，中国法律也都是可以看到我的那个博客，也都已经由我本人在2015年及2018年就特别通知了我父系母系的主要亲属关系。按照法律，没有他们的钱，就是没有。我知道的是我们家的爷爷们每代都有分家产，也就是没有任何一个爷爷欠下了他自己的下种费和亲热费，需要我这个做孙女的代为偿还，所以，也就没有什么只是因为有血缘关系就必须拿我的钱的。这就是在亲兄弟明算账，遗嘱继承是依照爷爷自己的意愿，我拿的是爷爷特别给我一个人的钱。
--------节摘自2019年3月6日文章“亲兄弟明算账”。
03-07-2019 Commercial Property Registration Laws and Political Governing-ship
I heard it has been a huge amusement in Chinese communities when there was an episode about a lady who had a big forehead family birthmark wish to let her family birthmark heir child own the Europe which was her share of the allot.
I was part of this amusement because my family (also) have a big forehead birthmark, I used possibly "also" because I don't know if that episode is about my Trust and there were some other families also have big forehead family birthmarks in that same episode.
Why it is so funny? Well, there are a lot of countries now in Europe. China has been through so many dynasty changes that even commercial ownership of a piece of land in the Republic of China time has not been acknowledged since the New Communism China since 1949, and this episode announced ownership entrusted of the land of entire Europe. I heard there was some guess if that lady is a daughter from Genghis Khan who was the only Chinese Emperor in history that had occupied Europe.
Let me try to explain a little more. Over history, tons of stories about how one group of people fought against another group of people to own a piece of land, this in China sometime brought dynasty change if the fight was big area enough, the fight was all about political governing-ship, but commercial ownership, which means owned by paying the fair property price of the land, normally acknowledged as valid even after dynasty changed, except the communism governing since 1949. Commercial property ownership is governed by property registration laws in almost all countries.
I was such amusement in Chinese community also because I do have lawfully valid entitlements which historically means normally should associate with a piece of land each, well, I say I do have some commercial ownership of some pieces of lands. Yeah!
----March 7th, 2019
Also, there were rumors in Los Angels area's Chinese communities that a Yu-family and a Li (Lee)-family had a big fight that involved several hundred Chinese people in the 1960s, which should mean a Lee's Family Trust company in Hong Kong area should be owned by the winner of such famous fight. I also heard that Lee's Family Trust company, as well as Hong Kong people never heard of such rumor, has caused a lot of agitation from the "winner" group. I say the company's ownership in this rumor is commercial ownership of a commercial company, not the political governing-ship of the Hong Kong geographic area, so this Hong Kong company's ownership has been governed by the commercial registration laws and owned by its lawfully registered owner, not the "winner" group.
----March 7th, 2019
03-06-2019 Three cousins Mr. Lu-s and their three Miss Yu wives (三个台湾人卢先生和他们的三个于小姐妻子）
I heard there is an attorney Mr. Peru Lu, a cousin to the famous Mr. Christopher Lu, is the featured person in the new rumors who can decide how to distribute my intellectual incomes without legal authorization but his own personal thoughts.
I heard his personal thoughts include:
1: Intellectual Incomes are supposedly based upon the evaluations happened in the past, not by my demand. But if the company insist on granting me, he thinks he can grant some amount given-out as well.
My answer: Mr. Lu is not part of the rumored investigation efforts to say that I was not granted intellectual reward by fair evaluation, and what I have been demanding are the intellectual incomes from the past evaluations. I disagree Mr. Lu has the privilege to change any money's lawful ownership by his personal opinions, unless that is lawfully his own money.
2: I don't have any valid inheriting, so he thinks it is absurd for me to demand to provide payment.
My answer: I have valid inheriting experience but what I have inherited have been what I heard of, I can't receive pre-decided living expenses providing from my inherited Trusts have been the reason I contact law enforcement, and I heard all pre-decided payments have been paid out on time as scheduled. I disagree these Mr. Lu-s don't believe if I have factually lawfully valid inheriting can be any excuse for them to encourage spreading hate expression among the Chinese communities to against me being a female living alone, nor to against if I can be capable to have any intellectual contributions that have earned intellectual incomes.
Plus, I heard both Mr. Peru Lu and one of his two cousins have been married to a Shanghai native Miss Yu. And I heard, Mr. Peru Lu's wife is a sister to a wife of an investor to Boston's Chinese Supermarket chain.
----March 6th, 2019
03-03-2019 A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws
Heard there was a recent interview that mentioned if I wrongly claimed someone else's money even though the name has not been spelled on my web blog.
My answer to that confusion is NO. I have not wrongfully claimed any money.
The money I have claimed are all investments from some ancient Trusts that each investment has been a part of an investment chain for, at least, accumulated over 600 years of operating history and has been operating in over 6+1 countries for over 400 years. The claims may not be accurate but all are definitely not wrongful claims.
If any of your friends have a concern that those companies I have claimed may have been owned by your friend's family-name, and the anxiety is somehow the company insist on to provide me money as I requested, I personally think the best way for a friend to do is to verify the company's lawful ownership according to the commercial company's registration law, which is similar to the motor vehicle's registration title or the property certificate, then ...
In my personal opinion, if the company is lawfully owned by your friend's family name, the matter can certainly be resolved according to laws, even if the confusion only has impacted your friend's family name, not to mention the anxiety of me receiving money from the company just by announcing so on the internet.
I have been calling laws help because my living has been impacted, and I am concerned if my life will be threatened as well. I am not fighting for my freedom of speech but speaking from the best knowledge of knowing who I am and what I own.
I am currently patiently waiting for my providing as a Trusts-beneficiary person, and I am not the person aware of a lot of investment issues which means I won't be helpful to a lot of confusions, but I hope none of those confusions can be the reason that I need to call law enforcement's help for any complaint that I may file for threatening my life and/or my living.
Reference about commercial company's registration:
----March 3rd, 2019
About those "so despised" same high school alumni:
My question: How they can be so despised when I never apply for any government benefits from them as their case-client, especially when I was never so impressively desperate and eager to please them while they are the almighty help-provider?
My understanding: They got to have some power not just don't care anything about my situation, but so despised by my situation plus how frustrated I have been.
02-24-2019 What possibly "I am surrounded by the same school graduated" means?（ “我的一切都被同一个学校毕业的给包围了“究竟可能是什么意思啊?
My question: How they can be so despised when I never apply for any government benefits from them as their case-client, especially when I was never so impressively desperate and eager to please them while they are the almighty help-provider?
My understanding: They got to have some power not just don't care anything about my situation, but so despised by my situation plus how frustrated I have been.
02-24-2019 What possibly "I am surrounded by the same school graduated" means?（ “我的一切都被同一个学校毕业的给包围了“究竟可能是什么意思啊?
----March 3rd, 2019
02-28-2019 How could I possibly contribute to Viagra's lab-testing?
Heard about doubts how could I possibly contribute to lab testing? The doubts obviously from the fact I have very bony lousy hands which means no good at all in lab testing.
I heard this doubt is related to some Viagra related lab testing. Well, I have to say the lab testing can occur into my mind may purely because the basic "if... else..." training as a computer programmer. I don't remember if I did contribute but I can try to illustrate if I can.
Since I was mentioning about my understanding of human reproductive function on a June Sunday in 2004, well, of course, "if that thought can be helpful, what else need to be in consideration to ensure this 'application' to be fully successful?" is a computer programmer's thinking-route.
So, as an FDA-equivalent institute's former apprentice member of Health Department organized pharmaceutical industry's yearly Inspection group, and in a coercive tone that I learned from those health department's Inspectors, the thoughts might have been "you are saying this can improve male-sexuality? how effective can you define this improvement? and how stable this effectiveness can be? Is it still 'no one knows if it is the beauty or the wine' effective? And what will be the effectiveness comparison objectives? I need all these."
So, it would be how to define the effectiveness of this improvement, how to define stability (or effective scope), and what should be the test objectives are what I might have been contributed to lab testing.
----Feb, 28th, 2019
I heard I had been a quick learner of the coercive leader style who having this authoritative deep in-tone but easy apprentice appearance in pharmaceutical industry Inspecting related work experience, may be the reason I was criticized heavily by the former colleagues if I can be a person having any academic achievement even after I changed my profession to technology. I heard pharmaceutical industry personnel can easily relate me as one of the health department's Inspectors, but relate some former colleagues, if on Inspecting assignments, to own quality in-house assurance departments.
Also, I got the following test score from my MBA graduating critical thinking test, it seems I need to have the law education to improve, such an LSAT baseline score.
02-26-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （16）-- 南师大附中，广播剧矛盾，及唐太宗李世民的继承人
Heard the anger that I have cash money with me but refuse to pay what I should and live comfortably.
My answer: I have been helped by laws to have a compromised thrift but not miserable living. I have been in a legal situation that I can't receive my lawful incomes is the reason I don't have a lot of money. Paying bills have been huge spending that can make my life very miserable.
----Feb. 26th, 2019
听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。”
我的回应是：这是误会。
首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。
还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍：
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民和东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人，而很多不熟悉
如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。
----2019年2月26日，2019年2月27日更新。
还有，有关谁才是唐太宗李世民继承人一事，
我的说法：其实，究竟谁是继承人应该是按照唐太宗李世民自己定下或认可的家族继承规则而言，如有变更，也必须是由按照唐太宗李世民自己认可的继承规则而继承的人所更改的才是有效更改。按照唐太宗李世民自己所认可的家族继承规则，我父亲方文海和我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。
我们家在唐朝历史上有一些皇帝不是我方敏的爷爷而是我爷爷的兄弟叔侄等，他们的后裔继承人应该说是他们自己这个皇帝爷爷的继承人，而不应该说他们自己是唐太宗李世明的继承人。他们自己的这个皇帝爷爷其实是他们这一支的起家立户爷爷。
----2019年2月26日