09-26-2019 血缘愤怒：“财产继承，应该是法律上的说法，不是你方敏自己的说法！”
法律权益必须是由已经施行的法律所赋予，而非由个人自己认为的
据说上海南京方面的方家血缘就我的博客言论非常气愤，一直强调我方敏不应该是财产的法律所有权的权威人士，他们也是因此不会相信我方敏个人对此的说法的，做为法律上可以鉴定的事实上的血缘关系亲属关系，他们寻求的是法律对于财产继承的说法。所以，我方敏也是一直在强调，
既然他们认为他们是有法律权益的，他们就应该去与法律相关的机构寻求答案
I）警察局（公安局），举报我本人或者我是在某些外国人协助下共同偷了他们的钱，
- 原因：没有任何个人也没有任何机构可以取代各国自己警察执行各国自己已经施行的法律，
- 原因：没有任何个人也没有任何机构可以取代法院有效法庭对于财产的法律所有权相关的法律纠纷的裁判权裁决权。
可是，据说中国司法部是已经调查了之后，也已经告知了他们：
- 没有任何人偷窃了他们自己名下的任何钱或者任何财产；
- 2004年之前就没有任何一笔财产是登记在他们的任何一个已经去世的爷爷父亲或者任何一个已经去世的奶奶妈妈的名下的；参阅：国人愤怒：“中国政府认可的李世民继承人”为何无法从外国企业领取生活费用
- 信托继承是必须依据遗嘱的；
- 信托里并没有他们因血缘关系亲属关系事实而可以继承的任何份额，
- 方敏和他们之间没有任何法律上的抚养责任义务关系，
- 方敏没有任何依据法律应该偿还给他们的财务欠债。
而且，他们自己也已经上过法院，也已经知道
- 必须提供事实依据向法院说明引发纠纷的财产及该财产的现有法律所有权归属，
- 必须提供事实依据向法院说明纠纷原因的法律依据，
- 法院从来不接受任何“认为或者可能”的没有任何事实依据的纠纷案件。
在上述这种情况下，他们所谓的“要法律的说法”愤怒就没有道理了。究竟是他们应该认为只要他们愤怒了就可以改变已经施行多年的法律，推翻已经施行多年的法律，还是他们应该依据已经施行多年的法律而重新认知什么才是他们的可以继承的财产以及什么才是他们的法律权益？法律权益只能是已经施行的法律所给与的所赋予的，从来不是他们可以自己认定或者自己认为的。
----2019年9月27日。
你们再来听听我听到的一些愤怒要求，
请问如果有某中国人是一家都在中华人民共和国境内生活工作的，如果这家人在中华人民共和国境内被如此要求了，被要求的该中国人一家会是如何依据中国文化中国传统中国法律予以回应？
你们再来听听我听到的一些愤怒要求，
请问如果有某中国人是一家都在中华人民共和国境内生活工作的，如果这家人在中华人民共和国境内被如此要求了，被要求的该中国人一家会是如何依据中国文化中国传统中国法律予以回应？
- 要求举例1：“你有钱，我和你是校友，虽然你并不认识我，可是为什么我就是不能花你的钱？”
- 要求举例2：“我们家有个姑娘嫁到你们家了，虽然是至少几百年之前的事，可她当年的嫁妆在哪里？凭什么（放在信托里）由你继承？”（据说有二十五代的方家奶奶的娘家姓氏是如此需要问问家里祖上的钱事的）
你们听着以为是在开玩笑？据说这些人，女的是哭到全身直打哆嗦，男的是一边抹眼泪一边哽咽泣诉，个个还都是一腔的愤怒，说我凭什么把钱直接放进自己口袋里？而且是誓言要将我千刀万剐。
就我的私有财产而言，他们究竟有哪一国法律所赋予的什么样的法律权益，居然如此愤怒我自己的合法财产是在我自己的钱包里？究竟是谁，需要激发如此情结，是想对我千刀万剐的吗？
----2019年9月27日。
附篇：Confusion about this blog's publishing
摘自 《寻宝日记》
The confusion about O'Connor's family name
There has been a lot of anger from O'Connor regarding my mentioning O'Connor names on my web blog. The reason I have to update my blog is to clarify some "why mention?", all the reason has been that I have been confronted fiercely or commented negatively, by O'Connor name's affiliated, regarding my inherited wealth I stated in my blog articles. So, I list my reasons why I agree there shouldn't be any mentioning for both parties:
1) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, that there shouldn't have any reason for any O'Connor affiliated to be confused about me stating my inherited wealth, nor for me to mention O'Connor name, which purely because I am not socially nor professionally associated with O'Connor name at all.
2) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, there should be no reason for me to be agitated regarding O'Connor name's family wealth, and there should be no reason for any O'Connor's name affiliated to be confused with my money and my money spending-ship, purely because O'Connor's family wealth is not associated to my inherited wealth.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
The confusion about my money-spending-ship and my any paid-in-full service:
I assume, all police officers and law peoples, at least in the United States, would agree with me that any money lawful ownership confusion can only be resolved by calling the police to do the law investigation, or file a civil lawsuit. I firmly believe nobody can replace the police on law investigation or enforcing laws, and I firmly believe nobody can replace the Judicial court on clarifying the money lawful ownership's legal confusion.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
就我的私有财产而言，他们究竟有哪一国法律所赋予的什么样的法律权益，居然如此愤怒我自己的合法财产是在我自己的钱包里？究竟是谁，需要激发如此情结，是想对我千刀万剐的吗？
----2019年9月27日。
附篇：Confusion about this blog's publishing
摘自 《寻宝日记》
The confusion about O'Connor's family name
There has been a lot of anger from O'Connor regarding my mentioning O'Connor names on my web blog. The reason I have to update my blog is to clarify some "why mention?", all the reason has been that I have been confronted fiercely or commented negatively, by O'Connor name's affiliated, regarding my inherited wealth I stated in my blog articles. So, I list my reasons why I agree there shouldn't be any mentioning for both parties:
1) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, that there shouldn't have any reason for any O'Connor affiliated to be confused about me stating my inherited wealth, nor for me to mention O'Connor name, which purely because I am not socially nor professionally associated with O'Connor name at all.
2) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, there should be no reason for me to be agitated regarding O'Connor name's family wealth, and there should be no reason for any O'Connor's name affiliated to be confused with my money and my money spending-ship, purely because O'Connor's family wealth is not associated to my inherited wealth.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
The confusion about my money-spending-ship and my any paid-in-full service:
I assume, all police officers and law peoples, at least in the United States, would agree with me that any money lawful ownership confusion can only be resolved by calling the police to do the law investigation, or file a civil lawsuit. I firmly believe nobody can replace the police on law investigation or enforcing laws, and I firmly believe nobody can replace the Judicial court on clarifying the money lawful ownership's legal confusion.
----Sept. 26th, 2019